quot;Apache
> ManifoldCF"?
>
> -- Jack Krupansky
>
> --
> From: "Karl Wright"
> Sent: Monday, October 04, 2010 9:56 AM
> To:
> Subject: Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Rename Apache Connectors Framework to ManifoldCF
>
>> On reflection, I
-- Jack Krupansky
--
From: "Karl Wright"
Sent: Monday, October 04, 2010 9:56 AM
To:
Subject: Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Rename Apache Connectors Framework to ManifoldCF
On reflection, I've actually decided to just use manifoldcf
everywhere,
that, but my inclination is to
>> go ahead with using mcf. I'll defer to Karl as to whether he wants to verify
>> our assumption through/with Grant/et al or just go ahead.
>>
>> -- Jack Krupansky
>>
>> ------------------
>>
: "Karl Wright"
> Sent: Sunday, October 03, 2010 7:35 PM
> To: "connectors-dev"
> Subject: [RESULT][VOTE] Rename Apache Connectors Framework to ManifoldCF
>
>> The vote passes. Barely. Total count +1. Although I believe we
>> didn't hear from
---
From: "Karl Wright"
Sent: Sunday, October 03, 2010 7:35 PM
To: "connectors-dev"
Subject: [RESULT][VOTE] Rename Apache Connectors Framework to ManifoldCF
The vote passes. Barely. Total count +1. Although I believe we
didn't hear from lots of
The vote passes. Barely. Total count +1. Although I believe we
didn't hear from lots of folks that made ManifoldCF their #1 choice
last time.
So, our new name is ManifoldCF. I'm thinking this will translate to:
org.apache.mcf
MCFException
MCF abbreviation
ManifoldCF full name
webapps mcf-craw
lost track of time. Did the simple up/down vote on ManifoldCF
> expire at 5:00 PM ET?
>
> -- Jack Krupansky
>
> --
> From: "Mark Miller"
> Sent: Wednesday, September 29, 2010 12:10 PM
> To:
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Ren
Karl, I've lost track of time. Did the simple up/down vote on ManifoldCF
expire at 5:00 PM ET?
-- Jack Krupansky
--
From: "Mark Miller"
Sent: Wednesday, September 29, 2010 12:10 PM
To:
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Rename Apache Connecto
"Mark Miller"
Sent: Wednesday, September 29, 2010 5:04 PM
To:
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Rename Apache Connectors Framework to ManifoldCF
That's really too high a bar. This community is still small. These types
of procedural votes are majority votes. 3 days is always given to give
plenty
e vote fails (<= 0 or < 0?), we would
>>> then
>>> vote on the next choice, which is... "Manicon".
>>>
>>> -- Jack Krupansky
>>>
>>> ------
>>> From: "Karl Wright"
>>> Sent: Wedne
right"
Sent: Wednesday, September 29, 2010 1:38 PM
To:
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Rename Apache Connectors Framework to ManifoldCF
<= 0 means failure.
Karl
On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 12:09 PM, Jack Krupansky
wrote:
Ah, okay, that's cool. So if the vote fails (<= 0 or < 0?), we wou
---
> From: "Karl Wright"
> Sent: Wednesday, September 29, 2010 12:01 PM
> To:
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Rename Apache Connectors Framework to ManifoldCF
>
>> We're trying for an up/down confirmation of ManifoldCF as a new name
>>
On 9/28/10 6:40 PM, Karl Wright wrote:
> Vote +1 to rename Apache Connectors Framework to Apache ManifoldCF.
> Vote -1 to keep the project name of Connectors Framework, or to retain
> Connex, if that wins its vote.
>
> This vote also expires end of day on Friday.
>
> Note: "Manifold" is a tradema
you think? Which title should be
> >
> used?
>
> Karl
>
>
>
> On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 7:30 PM, Jack Krupansky
> wrote:
>> -1 for me. Standing alone it's an okay name, but trying to actually
>> >> use it
>> is a pain (and we might as well c
rs Framework in Action". It would probably
>>>> need to be "Apache ManifoldCF in Action", or just "ManifoldCF in
>>>> Action".
>>>>
>>>> Grant, you wrote a book. What do you think? Which title should be used?
>>>>
>>>> K
Framework, I think? And with other Karl and I voting on that so far (+1 and
> -1)? I'll let Karl send out a proper reminder of wherever he says we are.
>
> -- Jack Krupansky
>
> --
> From: "Karl Wright"
> Sent:
hat's fine
with me.
-- Jack Krupansky
--
From: "Karl Wright"
Sent: Wednesday, September 29, 2010 11:08 AM
To:
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Rename Apache Connectors Framework to ManifoldCF
May I point out that we've been discussing this issue for over two months
now?
We just wen
> Karl
>
>
>
> On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 7:30 PM, Jack Krupansky
> wrote:
>> -1 for me. Standing alone it's an okay name, but trying to actually
>> use it
>> is a pain (and we might as well call it MCF). But I'll certainly go
>> along
>> with the
>
>> > On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 7:30 PM, Jack Krupansky
>> > wrote:
>> >> -1 for me. Standing alone it's an okay name, but trying to actually use it
>> >> is a pain (and we might as well call it MCF). But I'll certainly go along
>> >> wi
rote:
> >> -1 for me. Standing alone it's an okay name, but trying to actually use it
> >> is a pain (and we might as well call it MCF). But I'll certainly go along
> >> with the majority.
> >>
> >> -- Jack Krupansky
> >>
>
om line, a name with three basic, core variations: "ManifoldCF", "MCF",
"Manifold Connectors Framework".
-- Jack Krupansky
--
From: "Karl Wright"
Sent: Tuesday, September 28, 2010 8:04 PM
To:
Subject: Re:
it at least half violates the spirit
>>>>> of rule #1:
>>>>>
>>>>> (1) It's a single word
>>>>>
>>>>> It is a single word plus this extra "CF" acronym thing.
>>>>
>>>> That's a stretch that the rational part of my brain is going
ally use it
> is a pain (and we might as well call it MCF). But I'll certainly go along
> with the majority.
>
> -- Jack Krupansky
>
> ----------
> From: "Karl Wright"
> Sent: Tuesday, September 28, 2010 7:25 PM
> To:
>
September 28, 2010 7:25 PM
To:
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Rename Apache Connectors Framework to ManifoldCF
Ok, I just want an up-or-down vote on ManifoldCF at this point. +1 from
me.
Karl
On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 7:22 PM, Mark Miller
wrote:
On 9/28/10 7:10 PM, Jack Krupansky wrote:
Fair enough. I
t;
> Okay, lets vote again. For some reason ManifoldCF will stop topping the
> list why? Everyone will come to their senses? Some of us are so sick of
> this name thing we won't vote, and if your lucky those will be the
> ManifoldCF supporters? I mean come on...
>
>>
>
;
>> Unless it has legal problems, it fits our requirements.
>>
>> -- Jack Krupansky
>>
>> --
>> From: "Karl Wright"
>> Sent: Tuesday, September 28, 2010 6:52 PM
>> To:
>> Subject:
Jack Krupansky
>
> ------------------
> From: "Karl Wright"
> Sent: Tuesday, September 28, 2010 6:52 PM
> To:
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Rename Apache Connectors Framework to ManifoldCF
>
>> Jack,
>>
>> That's one
fall where they may.
-- Jack Krupansky
--
From: "Karl Wright"
Sent: Tuesday, September 28, 2010 6:46 PM
To:
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Rename Apache Connectors Framework to ManifoldCF
I'm tempted. Apache Nothing has a nice ring to it. ;-)
ext candidate on the list was... Manicon, 19
>
> Unless it has legal problems, it fits our requirements.
>
> -- Jack Krupansky
>
> ------------------
> From: "Karl Wright"
> Sent: Tuesday, September 28, 2010 6:52 PM
> To:
> Subject:
te
for
the revised candidate list with Connex removed.
-- Jack Krupansky
--
From: "Mark Miller"
Sent: Tuesday, September 28, 2010 6:43 PM
To:
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Rename Apache Connectors Framework to ManifoldCF
hmmm...I think I'm all voted out. Can we just call it nothing?
On 9/2
--
>> From: "Mark Miller"
>> Sent: Tuesday, September 28, 2010 6:43 PM
>> To:
>> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Rename Apache Connectors Framework to ManifoldCF
>>
>>> hmmm...I think I'm all voted out. Can we just call it nothing?
>>>
>
-
> From: "Mark Miller"
> Sent: Tuesday, September 28, 2010 6:43 PM
> To:
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Rename Apache Connectors Framework to ManifoldCF
>
>> hmmm...I think I'm all voted out. Can we just call it nothing?
>>
>> On 9/28/
ubject: Re: [VOTE] Rename Apache Connectors Framework to ManifoldCF
hmmm...I think I'm all voted out. Can we just call it nothing?
On 9/28/10 6:40 PM, Karl Wright wrote:
Vote +1 to rename Apache Connectors Framework to Apache ManifoldCF.
Vote -1 to keep the project name of Connectors F
I'm tempted. Apache Nothing has a nice ring to it. ;-)
Maybe we should just give up with the voting and appoint a Naming
Czar. Seriously.
Karl
On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 6:43 PM, Mark Miller wrote:
> hmmm...I think I'm all voted out. Can we just call it nothing?
>
> On 9/28/10 6:40 PM, Karl Wrig
hmmm...I think I'm all voted out. Can we just call it nothing?
On 9/28/10 6:40 PM, Karl Wright wrote:
> Vote +1 to rename Apache Connectors Framework to Apache ManifoldCF.
> Vote -1 to keep the project name of Connectors Framework, or to retain
> Connex, if that wins its vote.
>
> This vote also
Vote +1 to rename Apache Connectors Framework to Apache ManifoldCF.
Vote -1 to keep the project name of Connectors Framework, or to retain
Connex, if that wins its vote.
This vote also expires end of day on Friday.
Note: "Manifold" is a trademark for a GIS software product. However,
I agree with
36 matches
Mail list logo
