Re: [coreboot] [PATCH] nvramtool: Fix CMOS layout initialization using option table

2011-03-09 Thread Mathias Krause
On 08.03.2011 19:48, Mathias Krause wrote: Move get_layout_from_cmos_table() to accessors/layout-bin.c so process_layout() will do its check against the right cmos_table. This bug was introduced with r6314. Forgot the most important part! Of course: Signed-off-by: Mathias Krause

[coreboot] correct 'power_on_after_fail' setting

2011-03-09 Thread Josef Kellermann
Hi, bit 0 of pm reg#74 have to be set turn on system after power resumes. See '42661_sb600_rrg_nda_3.02.pdf' for detail. Signed-off-by: Josef Kellermann se...@arcor.de mailto://se...@arcor.de diff --git a/src/southbridge/amd/sb600/sm.c b/src/southbridge/amd/sb600/sm.c index 1a0d6ac..66c22e7

[coreboot] [The 604 CAR crusades][Master Yoda style] Preludium

2011-03-09 Thread Alex G.
Hi everyone, The Tyan S2735 a Socket 604 (Intel) board it is which CAR it uses I found. Why care I should? yourself you ask. Because eight boards which socket 604 use, ROMCC they are. dell/s1850 intel/jarrell intel/xe7501devkit supermicro/x6dai_g supermicro/x6dhe_g supermicro/x6dhe_g2

[coreboot] [PATCH] [1/4] [The 604 CAR crusades] Episode I - The Superio Menace

2011-03-09 Thread Alex G.
See patch. Enable the NSC PC87427 early_init to be used with CAR boards. The regular coompiler will complain about unused variables or unused functions. Remove unused variables, and only include unused functions if __ROMCC__ is defined. Signed-off-by: Alexandru Gagniuc mr.nuke...@gmail.com

[coreboot] [PATCH] [3/4] [The 604 CAR crusades] Episode III - Revenge of the Abuild

2011-03-09 Thread Alex G.
While the previous two patches were innocently trivial and abuild tested, this one _will_ break the build for several Socket 604 boards. We want the build to be broken until we can port those to CAR. See patch for verbosity. The Tyan s2735 is a Socket 604 board that uses CAR. cache_as_ram.inc is

[coreboot] [PATCH][2/4][The 604 CAR crusades] Episode II - The Northbridge Wars

2011-03-09 Thread Alex G.
See patch. We need to do two things to allow the intel e7520 to be used by CAR boards. Remove unused variables. Add a declaration for sdram_initialize(). Signed-off-by: Alexandru Gagniuc mr.nuke...@gmail.com Index: src/northbridge/intel/e7520/raminit.c

Re: [coreboot] [PATCH] [3/4] [The 604 CAR crusades] Episode III - Revenge of the Abuild

2011-03-09 Thread Stefan Reinauer
* Alex G. mr.nuke...@gmail.com [110309 21:59]: While the previous two patches were innocently trivial and abuild tested, this one _will_ break the build for several Socket 604 boards. We want the build to be broken until we can port those to CAR. Please provide a patch that does that. Actually

[coreboot] [PATCH] [4/4] [The 604 CAR crusades] Episode IV - A new board

2011-03-09 Thread Alex G.
See patch. Fixes the build errors that occur when compiling the Supermicro X6DHE-G2 as a CAR board. Unused variables are removed, and unused functions are excluded with #if/#endif Signed-off-by: Alexandru Gagniuc mr/nuke...@gmail.com Index: src/mainboard/supermicro/x6dhe_g2/Kconfig

Re: [coreboot] [PATCH] [3/4] [The 604 CAR crusades] Episode III - Revenge of the Abuild

2011-03-09 Thread Alex G.
On 03/09/2011 11:19 PM, Stefan Reinauer wrote: * Alex G. mr.nuke...@gmail.com [110309 21:59]: While the previous two patches were innocently trivial and abuild tested, this one _will_ break the build for several Socket 604 boards. We want the build to be broken until we can port those to CAR.

Re: [coreboot] [PATCH] [3/4] [The 604 CAR crusades] Episode III - Revenge of the Abuild

2011-03-09 Thread Alex G.
On 03/09/2011 11:23 PM, Alex G. wrote: On 03/09/2011 11:19 PM, Stefan Reinauer wrote: Did you verify that all CPUs that can be plugged into a Socket 604 can actually do CAR? Pentium, P2, and P3 can all do CAR. The 604 Xeons, which are based on P4 can most definitely do CAR. To that 603

[coreboot] [PATCH] [The 604 CAR crusades] Episode V - Mr. Nuke strikes back

2011-03-09 Thread Alex G.
See patch Converts the Supermicro X6DHE-G to use CAR. Signed-off-by: Alexandru Gagniuc mr/nuke...@gmail.com Index: src/mainboard/supermicro/x6dhe_g/Kconfig === --- src/mainboard/supermicro/x6dhe_g/Kconfig (revision 6429) +++

[coreboot] [PATCH] [The 604 CAR crusades] Episode VI - Return of the Patcher

2011-03-09 Thread Alex G.
I hope you don't mind my submitting two patches in one email. I'm running out of titles to inspire myself from. Alex Converts the Supermicro X6DAI-G to use CAR. Depends on the Intel e7525 CAR patch. Signed-off-by: Alexandru Gagniuc mr/nuke...@gmail.com Index:

[coreboot] [PATCH] [The 604 CAR crusades] Cyborg Bear

2011-03-09 Thread Alex G.
Two more boards, right here, right now. CARing for the Supermicro X6DHR-IG2 Signed-off-by: Alexandru Gagniuc mr.nuke...@gmail.com Index: src/mainboard/supermicro/x6dhr_ig2/Kconfig === --- src/mainboard/supermicro/x6dhr_ig2/Kconfig

Re: [coreboot] [PATCH] [3/4] [The 604 CAR crusades] Episode III - Revenge of the Abuild

2011-03-09 Thread Joseph Smith
On 03/09/2011 04:19 PM, Stefan Reinauer wrote: * Alex G.mr.nuke...@gmail.com [110309 21:59]: While the previous two patches were innocently trivial and abuild tested, this one _will_ break the build for several Socket 604 boards. We want the build to be broken until we can port those to CAR.

[coreboot] [PATCH] [The 604 CAR crusades] Lord of the drinks - The two patches

2011-03-09 Thread Alex G.
Two patches yet again. CARing for the Intel XE 7501 Dev Kit. Signed-off-by: Alexandru Gagniuc mr.nuke...@gmail.com Index: src/mainboard/intel/xe7501devkit/Kconfig === --- src/mainboard/intel/xe7501devkit/Kconfig (revision 6429) +++

[coreboot] [PATCH] [The 604 CAR crusades] Lord of the Drinks - The Fellowship of the Jarrell

2011-03-09 Thread Alex G.
Only one this time. CARing for the Intel Jarrell Signed-off-by: Alexandru Gagniuc mr.nuke...@gmail.com Index: src/mainboard/intel/jarrell/Kconfig === --- src/mainboard/intel/jarrell/Kconfig (revision 6429) +++

Re: [coreboot] [PATCH] [3/4] [The 604 CAR crusades] Episode III - Revenge of the Abuild

2011-03-09 Thread Alex G.
On 03/10/2011 02:30 AM, Joseph Smith wrote: Yes I am a little confused. Alex did you actually test CAR on a Socket 604 board? Or is this all just abuilded? I researched the matter, found that those CPUs support it, and I even found that a board already implemented CAR for 604 CPUs. Please the

[coreboot] [PATCH] [The 604 CAR crusades] Lord of the Drinks - Return of the Dell

2011-03-09 Thread Alex G.
Last two, I promise. CARing for the Supermicro NSC PC8374 Superio Excluded an unused function from being compiled. This superio is only used by the Dell S1850 Signed-off-by: Alexandru Gagniuc mr.nuke...@gmail.com Index: src/superio/nsc/pc8374/early_init.c

Re: [coreboot] [PATCH] [3/4] [The 604 CAR crusades] Episode III - Revenge of the Abuild

2011-03-09 Thread Joseph Smith
On 03/09/2011 08:04 PM, Alex G. wrote: On 03/10/2011 02:30 AM, Joseph Smith wrote: Yes I am a little confused. Alex did you actually test CAR on a Socket 604 board? Or is this all just abuilded? I researched the matter, found that those CPUs support it, and I even found that a board already

Re: [coreboot] [PATCH] [3/4] [The 604 CAR crusades] Episode III - Revenge of the Abuild

2011-03-09 Thread Alex G.
On 03/10/2011 03:43 AM, Joseph Smith wrote: Sorry to say Alex, unless someone can with the hardware (at least one board can confirm) I will have to sit this one out. I know from developing CAR for both i830 and i810 that things can got wrong very easily, and if they do you will not even get

[coreboot] Support fot UMC UM8670 Super IO

2011-03-09 Thread Anup Rao
Hi Everyone, I want to install Coreboot on an old Cyrix 6x86 machine. It comes equipped with a M558 motherboard. The AMI BIOS string ID is 51-0830-001437-0011-071595-UT801X-001_10_UTRON-F Further details can be found on this webpage: http://motherboards.mbarron.net/models/pcchips/m558.htm

Re: [coreboot] [PATCH] nvramtool: Fix CMOS layout initialization using option table

2011-03-09 Thread Peter Stuge
Mathias Krause wrote: On 08.03.2011 19:48, Mathias Krause wrote: Move get_layout_from_cmos_table() to accessors/layout-bin.c so process_layout() will do its check against the right cmos_table. This bug was introduced with r6314. Forgot the most important part! Of course:

[coreboot] [commit] r6440 - in trunk/util/nvramtool: . accessors

2011-03-09 Thread repository service
Author: oxygene Date: Thu Mar 10 08:52:02 2011 New Revision: 6440 URL: https://tracker.coreboot.org/trac/coreboot/changeset/6440 Log: nvramtool: Move code so it has access to the right data structures Signed-off-by: Mathias Krause mathias.kra...@secunet.com Acked-by: Peter Stuge pe...@stuge.se