Ideally, I want to be able to configure a user to POP some of their mail...
First I thought of creating a special folder, and moving the special
messages there... but how could I set the pop3d to read from a folder - not
the main inbox?!?!?
I can run a special authd and pop3d if that would
I've set up some users to run maildrop for SpamAssasin - the trouble is, my
formerly shell-crippled accounts have to be switched to use /bin/sh or
/bin/bash - otherwise the maildrop filtering process seems to buther the
messages.
My normal shell for these users (noshell) is a simple shell program
As someone who has added their own headerrs to submit, after much trial and
error - I say show me ;-)
thanks.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Roland
Schneider
Sent: Wednesday, March 05, 2003 1:04 PM
To: courier-users
Subject: Re:
I apologize for the repost, but I didn't see any reply... not sure if my
questions are too easy, too hard, or not getting out ;-) Thanks.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Mitch
(WebCob)
Sent: Tuesday, March 04, 2003 10:35 PM
To: [EMAIL
I apologize for the repost, but I didn't see any reply... not sure if my
questions are too easy, too hard, or not getting out ;-) Thanks.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Mitch
(WebCob)
Sent: Tuesday, March 04, 2003 10:27 PM
To: [EMAIL
Interesting... is there anyone interested or developing support for this
feature in courier?
m/
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Patrick
Bihan-Faou
Sent: Thursday, March 06, 2003 1:58 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [courier-users] Re:
: Thursday, March 06, 2003 3:47 AM
To: Mitch (WebCob)
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [courier-users] Need to POP for only SOME of the IMAP mail?
Any ideas?
On Wed, Mar 05, 2003 at 03:22:10PM -0800, Mitch (WebCob) wrote:
I apologize for the repost, but I didn't see any reply... not sure if my
?).
Thanks.
m/
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Brian
Candler
Sent: Thursday, March 06, 2003 11:42 AM
To: Mitch (WebCob)
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [courier-users] Need to POP for only SOME of the IMAP mail?
Any ideas?
On Thu, Mar 06, 2003
I'm using mysql from the auth daemon for virtual domains.
I have REAL unix accounts per user.
I want to run maildrop.
In most cases, I don't want the users to have shell access.
but when I create .courier:
|/usr/lib/courier/bin/maildrop /home/useraccount/.mailfilter
AND .mailfilter (owned by
Sent: Thursday, March 06, 2003 1:31 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [courier-users] Need to POP for only SOME of the IMAP
mail?Any ideas?
on 3/6/03 11:41 AM, Brian Candler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Mar 06, 2003 at 09:04:10AM -0800, Mitch (WebCob) wrote:
Perhaps I could run a second
shell
access? What do I have to do?
Mitch (WebCob) said the following on 03/07/2003 06:47 AM:
I'm using mysql from the auth daemon for virtual domains.
I have REAL unix accounts per user.
I want to run maildrop.
In most cases, I don't want the users to have shell access.
but when I create
Ok, so maybe I'm crazy, but couldn't the UID be generated in a reversable
form from the filename itself? Thereby eliminating the database and allowing
a message to keep it's UID across file moves?
Maybe I'm oversimplifying, but is there a reason such a scheme is
impossible?
m/
-Original
uniqueness is required, so perhaps it would be
fine?
Or am I way off base?
m/
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Sam
Varshavchik
Sent: Monday, March 10, 2003 2:43 PM
To: Courier-Users
Subject: [courier-users] Re: imapd slow
Mitch \(WebCob\) writes
I'm sure someone can correct me, but I think the ID is currently based on
the system time and the inode number of the file or something like that -
which forces uniqueness even in a system with multiple processors - as long
as the messages are on the same filesystem.
It's got nothing to do with
But there is a very good reason James.
Don't get me wrong - I don't consider changing or violating an RFC a light
thing, but there are many good cases made all the time... Consider couriers
8 bit warning messages... I've not met (personally) the person who hasn't
had some user complain because
. ... E.g. Regenerating UID's might then require
renaming EVERY file in a folder. That's probably bad. ;) -- Although I
can see ways around even that with an intelligently organized naming
structure.
So, I'm just asking.
-jab
On Monday, Mar 10, 2003, at 16:42 US/Central, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
Mitch
You could, I suppose, fix things up so that NEXTUID is rewritten in place;
and just append new messages when doing a copy. However, locking - in fact
- is optional, so this will break if locking is turned off.
Which is significant I guess particularly if you get to the point where you
are using
Well, I don't know how many people very few is, but I do know, that as an
alternative to MS-Exchange, IMAP server storage is finding more and more use
amoung my clients and clients of those I network with.
Many companies are requiring their servers configured in a way to capture
ALL outgoing mail
I hear you, and I agree, BUT if you are talking about 8-bit messages, that
can be turned off...
Users will be much happier then - Or can you give a more specific example?
This is the only annoyance I've experienced - and it's fixable!
m/
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I know I've seen this somewhere...
I need to capture mail FROM a specific user and keep it on file. I believe I
read somewhere about a way to configure courier to capture ALL outgoing
mail, and if anyone can point me to that I would appreciate it.
This is for mail that is destined for a remote
ideas?
Thanks.
m/
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Mitch
(WebCob)
Sent: Friday, March 14, 2003 2:49 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [courier-users] Capturing OUTGOING mail?
I know I've seen this somewhere...
I need to capture mail FROM
it was the courierd component that required restarting - thanks.
m/
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by:Crypto Challenge is now open!
Get cracking and register here for some mind boggling fun and
the chance of winning an Apple iPod:
I've just finished going over the information at
http://www.courier-mta.org/queue.html, and it provides 99% of what I need,
but I need that extra 1%. Maybe I'm missing something, and if I am, please
correct the error of my ways... thanks.
The control file records seem include f (from HELO data or
I see two record types from the control files I don't see documented A and
p - can anyone point me to the starting point for the courier control file
code?
m/
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by:Crypto Challenge is now open!
Get cracking
: [courier-users] Re: Additional Q information needed - If I
build it, is it worthy of inclusion?
Mitch \(WebCob\) writes:
I see two record types from the control files I don't see documented A
and
p - can anyone point me to the starting point for the courier control
file
code?
courier/libs
It's my understanding that not all versions of the crypt call support MD5 in
the same way (i.e. triggering it with the '$1$' seed)
HOWEVER, on 3 different versions of FreeBSD, and one other Linux, my results
are the same as your Linux.
m/
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Because once the copy is complete, there are TWO different messages which
each could be opened and edited and saved independantly I think...
With hardlinks there would only be one... which would be more of a clone
then a copy ;-)
m/
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Users
Subject: RE: [courier-users] Question about COPY operation
On Wed, 19 Mar 2003, Mitch \(WebCob\) wrote:
Because once the copy is complete, there are TWO different messages which
each could be opened and edited and saved independantly I think...
With hardlinks there would only be one
Also - if a few fields were requested (user base size, hardware and number
of machines) it could tell us something about the average user.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Eduardo
Roldan
Sent: Thursday, March 20, 2003 7:58 AM
To: Courier
My understanding was that sqwebmail used direct access through it's setuid
access to read the Maildirs directly, thereby reducing server and localloop
network load.
It should be faster and run better for more users on a machine I think.
Also, it's compiled C code, and that should count for
Sam wrote:
May not work with shared folders.
. Hmm. Can you be more specific? I have an ugly patch that does
Messages in shared folders use soft links. Creating a hard link
to a soft link brings wildly different results on different
platforms. On some platforms the soft link is
Sam wrote:
What is the reason to use soft links in the shared folders?
I would think that hardlinks (with an independance of file
permissions on
the original file) would provide advantages from a group
membership and maintenance point of view...
The sharable mailbox may be on a different
It does. It reads maildirs and caches the metadata for efficiency of
display.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Chris
Berry
Sent: Friday, March 21, 2003 11:58 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [courier-users] Re: (sqwebmail vs. squirrelmail) on
Assuming you have some sort of pattern to your virtual ID's, you could write
your own auth module to call authpam and then generate the required path info
programatically
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Jon
Nelson
Sent: March 25, 2003
Not withstanding Sam's point, I've done this when shutting down a client
who's late with the bill - existing DNS with a short TTL and pointing to
local host gives INSTANT notification that the site is down, the mail is
bouncing etc.
Killing off the DNS or deleting the MX record can still result
Did you remove the ip6 code (there is a configure option for this) - causes
issues if memory serves... particularly with DNS lookups I think.
m/
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of RICHARD
GINZBURG
Sent: Wednesday, April 02, 2003 6:25 PM
To:
symptoms first time I set up, so I think your options are recompile, or try
to determine IF DNS is working under IP6 for you.
m/
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Dustin
Puryear
Sent: Thursday, April 03, 2003 9:01 AM
To: Mitch (WebCob)
Cc
Care to PATCH the PATCH JE? for those of us who do not speak C as a mother
tongue ;-)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Johannes
Erdfelt
Sent: Friday, June 06, 2003 11:02 AM
To: Matt Pavlovich
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [courier-users]
Sometimes, when I run makealiases, etc., the process does not seem to
properly notify courier of the change. I'm triggering these processes like
this (from a php script)
`/usr/lib/courier/sbin/makehosteddomains`;
sleep(1);
`/usr/lib/courier/sbin/makeacceptmailfor`;
sleep(1);
-scan.com-3288-1055437202-0002
Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Mitch (WebCob) writes:
Sometimes, when I run makealiases, etc., the process does not seem to
properly notify courier of the change. I'm triggering these processes like
this (from a php
Hey guys - this MAY not be the same issue, but I've seen delete's fail on OS
that support locking when the folder is selected by the mail client.
e.g: If I have a fdolder selected in Outlook, I CAN NOT right click and
delete. It fails with an error message. This may be the way NFS is
maintaining
Not a problem with courier - a problem with the client trying to verify signing
of the cert by one of it's known good certificate authorities. You can either
ignore the error, OR install a signed cert OR install the cert in your client
certificate store - beyond the scope of this list - look into
My advice would be to use the SubjectAlternativeName (AKA
SubjectAltName) SSLv3 extension instead to list multiple host names (and
IP addresses) specificly. Google may tell you more. Most browsers and
mail
Is it possible to add domains to an existing certificate ?
For example if a server
Fantastic - thanks!
I admit I probably missed it, but I didn't see it in the docs... is there a
section I should refer to?
Thanks again.
-Original Message-
Ok - in courier, there doesn't SEEM to be a way to configure multiple
certs
without running multiple daemons. Is there anything
Hey Andrew - in the interrum, here is a patch to maildrop I wrote a while
ago - this is the original message... let me know how it works for you or if
you fix my bug? Thanks...
NOTE this is intended to create a subfolder - not a whole maildir - there
are a few things missing for a top level mail
Because when you INSTALL something, the files are COPIED to the the INSTALL
location...
Your home / build directory is like the CD source for a windows program - when
you make install it is copied to the running location - when you are done, you
don't need the copy under $HOME any more.
m/
You've
got a few things to look into Lars - this isn't really a courier
question...
You
need to look at distributed replicated storage systems(afs, coda, or
simply replicated NFS...) which are all off topic
Then
you need to decide your method for connection failover - DNS with recrd
each other, via rsync for
example ? I do know this is probably off topic, but still, having to deal with
courier as an application, how does people solve the problem ?
/Lars
- Original Message -
From:
Mitch (WebCob)
To: Lars Holmström ; [EMAIL PROTECTED
Sure - I think anyone who's looked as probably seen evidence of that - though
I'd say caching of failed lookups is a more common occurrence. But, being as we
are dealing with clients who we are trying to provide transparent fail over for,
I'm not sure what other option you think anyone has... Not
Trash files are only purged on connect I think - don't think it happens on
disconnect - so that would mean that if people delete stuff and log off, they
won't be purged until next logon AFTER the messages have expired (the number of
days on the trash setting).
Think this is all in the manual
Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Alexei
Batyr'
Sent: July 14, 2003 5:53 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [courier-users] Re: ~/Maildir/.Trash for the obsessive
compulsive
Mitch (WebCob) wrote on Sunday, July 13, 2003 8:27 PM [GMT+4=MSD]:
Trash
Hmmm... Interesting concept, but I wonder what performance gain it would
provide - something like rsync uses inode mtimes to only traverse file system
points that have been changed - pretty efficient, and it doesn't restrict itself
to a single application. I wonder what the overhead and sequencing
Hey Derrick!
It is my understanding that what you are attempting is not allowed. Courier
caches some of the information I think - or does that only apply to the message
body file itself?
There was discussion before about having to force courier to reload the files
from disk if you made changes -
Not sure, but I think there are some config options in apache that could prevent
the setuid from being executed...
Maybe it's something like that?
Did you check the apache error logs?
m/
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of TWC |
Mario
Steve McAllister writes:
What is a good method to recover from a backup of a courier-mta server
or migrating?
The fact that the inodes wouldn't match the filenames in most cases.
What are people doing?
Sam:
It's rather unlikely that restoring yesterday's mail queue is such a hot
Mitch (WebCob) writes:
Steve McAllister writes:
What is a good method to recover from a backup of a courier-mta server
or migrating?
The fact that the inodes wouldn't match the filenames in most cases.
What are people doing?
Sam:
It's rather unlikely that restoring
Sam wrote:
Well, you need to take each pair of Cn and Dn files out of the msgs
directory, and delete everything in msgq. Rename each pair so that 'n' is
the inode number of the C file. It's entirely possible that there might be
another C/D pair that happens to use the same inode name (and
Could be a variety of things including a bad firewall configuration.
Can you look at it form the outside? Can you telnet to the port 25 of the
mail server?
My understanding of MXE is that it is not REALLY a DNS record at all, but a
convention in web interfaces that allows you to configure an MX
I wonder if you could somehow access the internal whitelists that are in
the esmtpaccess file or something - why duplicate existing config options?
Just a thought.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Gordon
Messmer
Sent: Friday, July 25, 2003
Install the missing RPM's
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Eric
Sent: Friday, July 25, 2003 12:50 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [courier-users] Problem installation in RED HAT 9.0
when run this command:
rpmbuild -ta
Default is 7 days I think - though various people have reported having old
messages sticking around in some older versions.
m/
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Stephen
Reese
Sent: Friday, July 25, 2003 1:50 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:
]
Subject: [courier-users] trash folder seems to be purging?
lol, ya I've been using it as a tmp folder, it turned out to be more
temporary then I thought...
-Original Message-
From: Mitch (WebCob) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, July 25, 2003 5:29 PM
To: Stephen Reese; [EMAIL
That's half the solution though - the other part is to grep through the
archive directory and process the messages to determine which ones need to
be forwarded and to who - AND to skip ones that are a reforward of an
original message. A cron job and a bit of script should be able to do that
for
- you
will have to clean up this folder though or it will eat all your disk.
-Original Message-
From: Carey Jung [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, July 28, 2003 9:57 AM
To: Mitch (WebCob); Thomas von Hassel
Cc: Courier Users
Subject: RE: [courier-users] filtering outgoing mail
: Thomas von Hassel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, July 28, 2003 9:33 AM
To: Mitch (WebCob)
Cc: Courier Users; Carey Jung
Subject: Re: [courier-users] filtering outgoing mail
On mandag, jul 28, 2003, at 18:07 Europe/Copenhagen, Mitch (WebCob)
wrote:
That's half the solution though
It's trying to look up the address of your computer... look at the nodns
option I think.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Noah
Silverman
Sent: Wednesday, July 30, 2003 11:41 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [courier-users] Slowww SMTP
I've been thinking about migrating all my messy maildrop scripts to the
maildroprc, but not all apply to all users. What would anyone suggest is the
most efficient test of group membership? That way, I could say
if $userid in courier_spamfilter then
if $userid in coutier_defang then
Could work
Andrew - can I make a suggestion? Quit tweaking your config until you get it working -
then monkey with permissions all you want, but make notes so when you screw it up you
can repair it.
I'm only saying this cause you said you were a newbie to linux etc. in general.
Good procedure is follow
It's not a function of courier, but of the operating system and file systems
underlying it.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Graham
Leggett
Sent: Thursday, July 31, 2003 9:38 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [courier-users] Courier MTA as a
Ok - I'm not 100% on this, but shouldn't that script be something like:
#!/bin/sh
exec /usr/local/cerberus/cerberus-1.5.0-RH80 /usr/local/cerberus/config.xml
FATAL /var/log/cerberus.log
That way memory and other resources are not tied up by the essentially
useless sh process?
Is there a reason
No takers? Anyone have any ideas?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Mitch
(WebCob)
Sent: Thursday, July 31, 2003 8:16 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [courier-users] testing for group membership in maildrop?
I've been thinking about
Thanks...
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Mitch
(WebCob)
Sent: Thursday, July 31, 2003 8:36 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [courier-users] testing for group membership in maildrop?
No takers? Anyone have any ideas?
-Original
So how does one turn it off?
I've been seeing this more and more - and yes - they are exchange servers,
but no - I'm not going to fix it.
But none of my users seem to worry about TLS security and consider email
like a postcard anyways, so I'd just like to turn it off.
m/
-Original
Sam writes:
So:
Q: Is there a move instruction in IMAP?
Nope.
Hmmm...
Does courier webmail implement a move through direct Maildir access?
Yup. Like everything else it does.
Realized two things after the fact.
1) I took it off list accidentally I think.
2) My question was ambiguous.
When
Could have somethig to do with permissions or ownership of a .courier /
.mailfilter file too I think.
Still guessing.
m/
-Original Message-
From: TWC | Mario Peschel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, August 11, 2003 1:08 AM
To: Mitch (WebCob); [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re
/
-Original Message-
From: TWC | Mario Peschel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, August 11, 2003 1:08 AM
To: Mitch (WebCob); [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [courier-users] shell-init: could not get current
directory: getcwd: cannot access parent directories: Permission denied
Thanks
Jorge Izquierdo ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote*:
Hi everybody. I´m using Courier-IMAP version 1.7.2 and I have a problem
when trying to delete folders. Just after creation, with no messages and
no children, I try to delete the folder but I get an error message: NO
Cannot delete this folder. This is
Since we can assume dialback.py is on a Courier server, I'd like to put
some smartness to it, like use sysconfdir from /etc/init.d/courier, if
me exists use it, if not check for domainname, else use
gethostbyaddr(gethostname()).
my 2 cents...
jerry
Good thought Jerry - that's along the
What's in .mailfilter? Does the error occur without it?
-Original Message-
From: TWC | Mario Peschel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, August 11, 2003 1:21 AM
To: Mitch (WebCob); [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [courier-users] shell-init: could not get current
directory: getcwd
most likely place to start. My courier-imap/mta/esmtp server has been
occasionally (about once a month) creating a new in the Sent folders
of my users and moving all of the mail from within the Sent folder
into it. For example, just today it created INBOX.Sent.2003.06-Jun
and moved my mail
the message of You cannot delete this folder appear
on any folder created and testing it with protocol commands, so it is not a
client problem.
Please help ;-)
Jorge
Mensaje citado por Mitch (WebCob) [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Jorge Izquierdo ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote*:
Hi everybody. I´m using
TWC | Mario Peschel ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote*:
Hello,
I'm running Courier 0.42.2 on Sun Solaris. It works good and all emails are
delivered. But the logfile shows this error and I don't know what it means:
Aug 8 11:15:17 sun courierlocal: [ID 702911 mail.info]
users. Then you pick which servers you want to
use as public MX, put them in the DNS and the mail will all find it's way home.
m/
-Original Message-
From: Graham Leggett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: August 7, 2003 8:30 AM
To: Mitch (WebCob)
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Juri
Haberland
Sent: Tuesday, August 05, 2003 6:25 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [courier-users] Maildir file modification utility
So, I actually don't see how this is going to help your situation.
Yes, as long as it works with the generic authentication mechanism and
doesn't rely solely on assumed passwd or ldap stuff.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Bill Long
Sent: Thursday, August 14, 2003 9:36 AM
To: Courier
Subject: Re:
SSL encrypts the entire process.
You make your own cert or you buy one - if you buy one, you get the benefit
that your mail clients (specifically MS won't complain about an untrusted
root authority...) You CAN get around this, by creating a self signed root
certificate and installing this on EACH
which custom SQL clauses yes - just add your enabled test to the select.
m/
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Charlie
Davis
Sent: Tuesday, August 19, 2003 3:49 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [courier-users] Account Disabled with MySQL?
Very simply don't think it would work - requiring the mail to be SENT from
the server that is used to RECEIVE mail for a domain is not part of any spec
I am aware of - in fact many people I know including myself separate sending
functions from receiving functions - not to mention the confusing
, August 19, 2003 9:04 PM
To: Mitch (WebCob)
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [courier-users] Email hijacking
but is it too much to ask that the client sending the email resolve
to actually being in the domain of the MAIL FROM address??
M
On Tue, 19 Aug 2003, Mitch (WebCob) wrote:
Very
Perhaps there is another way to defur your feline?
You can filter based on size, and you could detect if you were NOT on the to or cc
list I think, so you could at least trash the mail - right?
m/
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Sam
Can't the whole process be made simpler by changing the tripplet to a
couplet?
Instead of watching sourceip, from address, to address can't we just watch
sourceip? or sourceip and to address?
Then those VERP's wouldn't matter, and once a server was known good it
could be allowed for all users
: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Gordon
Messmer
Sent: Friday, August 29, 2003 10:55 AM
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [courier-users] feature request
Mitch (WebCob) wrote:
Can't the whole process be made simpler by changing the tripplet to a
couplet?
Instead of watching
Some people use multiple 127.0.0.0/8 addresses to allow multiple services to
run on the same port - or for other various reasons... It's just another
address alias.
Not sure why your computer is set up this way, but it's normally
intentional.
m/
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL
Going out on a limb here, but I think there is an option in Apache to limit or
restrict setuid processing to be above a certain uid? Could this be something you did
a while ago and forgot?
m/
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Jim
Gifford
What you are proposing would block all Outlook users (and who knows who
else) who are not configured to be part of an NT domain (others say HELO
COMPUTERNAME - what ever that may be).
So I think you can only implement that test if you have very tight control
of your users, or could somehow
When you add a domain to locals, you are asking courier to use only the
name part and not the domain part when handling it locally. That means that
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] (if both in locals) become the same user.
Adding them to hosteddomains and esmtpacceptmailfor is the proper
Hi Marian.
I think there are a lot of us that would like to see this work!
For things like removing executable attachments from email, etc. Would love to
see what you have as I'm sure others would and then find out how to make it
work.
m/
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
vpopmail bug - heard this before - it's supposed to be in the faq or
something I think... known problem - not couriers fault.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Jon
Keller
Sent: Friday, September 05, 2003 11:51 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:
I have an excellent reason for this...
I think ;-)
I had a former employers box disconnected (we were all green once) because
they were running a mail server that wouldn't accept mail to the IP
address - they were being used as a relay, and although their upstream
provider TRIED to contact
on noatime:
If you are using caching systems on web servers which trigger cache
invalidation or rebuild based on stale files (long time since access last)
then making such a change could cause problem - the area of interest is the
courier working area var and the maildir user directories
1 - 100 of 315 matches
Mail list logo
