charles uchu wrote:
Sam Varshavchik wrote:
Gordon Messmer writes:
It's come up before that aliased hosteddomains sometimes don't do
what users expect them to. The man page for makehosteddomains
indicates that if mail.domain.com is aliased to domain.com, then
an address of the
Steve Mahlstedt wrote:
Hi all,
I'm running CentOS on a dev server which handles our email functions.
I used to run Dovecot but I decided to switch to courier-imap which I
have had some success with in the past.
I've built the rpm binaries for courier-auth for courier-imap and
installed
Jay Lee wrote:
On Tue, October 3, 2006 11:41 am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am setting up a mail server with courier-imap over SSL. I have no
problem connecting to the server with outlook express, outlook, and
thunderbird. I can download all messages.
I do get this message about SSL in
I'm top-posting because you did. But in the future, if you put your
comments in-line, it will be easier to follow the thread. I'm just too
lazy to fix it all...
We're authenticating against AD in a Win2K server environment just
fine. Here's part of my authldaprc
LDAP_URI
I have grep'd the maillog, messages log, and HTML error log, but cannot
find any logs containing failed login attempts from SqWebMail. Is that
information kept anywhere? We have a couple of paranoid users who would
like to know...
I saw the DEBUG_LOGIN option in the sqwebmaild config file, but
Jerry Amundson wrote:
On Wed April 12 2006 12:43, Steve Jacobson wrote:
It's a feature in courier. I'm not sure how to configure it yet, but
now that I know it's there, it shouldn't be too hard to track it
down...
Check etc/courier/imapd :
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: Dan Johansson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I'm about to setup a Courier mailsystem for a small Company (~50
accounts). I want to use virtual mail accounts on this system. I was
thinking about either a ldap or MySQL backend for authentication. So
my question is:
cases.
Other instances, I have to go the full 9 yards and build a lab environment
that mirrors the production systems...
Anyway, I hope these thoughts might help.
Good luck on your testing,
David Gomillion
---
SF.Net email is sponsored
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-Original Message-
From: dick hoogendijk
Sent: Monday, July 04, 2005 11:22 PM
With maildirs, no delimiters are necessary because it's one file per
message. Hence, no From_ line.
Which leads me to another question: is maildir the _better_ format?
Yup.
, after all.
Just some thoughts,
David Gomillion
---
SF.Net email is sponsored by: Discover Easy Linux Migration Strategies
from IBM. Find simple to follow Roadmaps, straightforward articles,
informative Webcasts and more! Get everything you need
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Is there any way to execute a program after a users
authenticates succesfully? I would like to pass the username
and (clear) password to have it update a different table.
I've hunted around for this but cant seem to find anything.
There has to be a way to do
not linked to SA, at least in my experience. See
http://www.courier-mta.org/FAQ.html#esmtptimeout for more information on
this.
I resolved the issue by setting the -noidentlookup as part of the
TCPDOPTS string in /etc/courier/esmtpd at around line 267.
I hope this helps,
David Gomillion
PROTECTED] mailbox. I think this is what you're really trying to
accomplish: a catch-all address.
For more information, please read
http://www.courier-mta.org/?makehosteddomains.html.
Hope this helps,
David Gomillion
---
SF email is sponsored
the mail from the world knowing what users are valid.
My recommendation would be to either:
1. Host the mailboxes on Courier
- or -
2. Implement spam checking and antivirus on Exchange
That having been said, good luck, and let us know how it works out.
Sincerely,
David Gomillion
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sam Varshavchik wrote:
Peter Ford writes:
The problem is that half the company is on another site and connects
through their ADSL router which masquerades the IP address.
MAXDAEMONS=4000 is a bit over the top, I admit, but MAXPERIP needs
to be big enough to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello everyone! I have CentOS 4.0 (RedHat Enterprise Linux
4.0 clone)
[snip]
However, after about 8 hours of uptime, Courier stops
accepting requests
and becomes incredibly slow. Has anyone seen this before? Once I
reboot the box...I'm good for another 8 hours or
well together?
David Gomillion wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello everyone! I have CentOS 4.0 (RedHat Enterprise Linux
4.0 clone)
[snip]
However, after about 8 hours of uptime, Courier stops
accepting requests
and becomes incredibly slow. Has anyone seen this before? Once I
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Mar 9 13:59:09 mail courieresmtpd:
started,ip=[:::11.22.33.44] Mar 9 13:59:09 mail
courieresmtpd: EHLO from.mailserver.com Mar 9 13:59:09 mail
courieresmtpd: MAIL FROM:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
BODY=7BIT SIZE=949
Mar 9 13:59:09 mail courieresmtpd: RCPT TO:[EMAIL
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all.
I've got a problem that has more or less followed me since I started
using courier and more specifik courier-imap. My server only
has a few
domains with a totalt of around twenty users that frequently
access the
server for their email.
It _never_ fails
,
David Gomillion
---
SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
Read honest candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users.
Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now.
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Bambero wrote:
4. Is it possible to set url www.mail.example.com (without frames)
for my webmail (http://www.mail.example.com/cgi-bin/webmail is so
long)
If it's apache, you can use mod_rewrite to direct users to the cgi.
Regardless of the http server, you
couldn't duplicate it
after taking the server out of production, but I would recommend using a
different distribution.
Hope that helps,
David Gomillion
---
SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
Read honest candid reviews on hundreds
it to work
out-of-the-box, then you can use CentOS 3.3 and then use yum to patch all
the bugs.
David Gomillion wrote:
For the archives:
The latest version of CentOS that builds Courier RPMs out-of-the-box is
3.3. If you do a full yum update before building the RPMS, it will not
work
on any of the distro CDs. Everything else required is on them.
I hope this helps somebody in the future.
Good Luck,
David Gomillion
---
SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
Read honest candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
chester c young said:
does anyone have recomendation for linux distro? putting up new dual
opteron box. will be doing courier mail plus Apache / postgresql /
php. ideally will run same on notebook, development server, backup
server, and eventual offload/mirror
All right. I've been playing with changing the spec file for the RPM to
work with CentOS, but I've not gotten deep enough into the world of RPM
to have an intelligent conversation.
Therefore, I am asking anybody who has successfully built RPMs on a RHEL
rip-off (Whitebox, Tao, CentOS) to please
I feel like I keep bringing this up, and I'm sorry, but I noticed
something.
When going back through the output of the RPM build, I noticed where it
showed the options for ./configure. Here's a copy of what mine
outputted:
+ ./configure --host=i686-redhat-linux-gnu --build=i686-redhat-linux-gnu
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello everybody...
[ I send this message again in case it eluded your attention
the first time ...
I have seen no comment on that so far by Sam or any other
member of the list ... ]
A question about the layout of the Sent folder in webmail.
In folder Sent the
. The tarball is
owned by my non-privileged account, and is being built by my
non-privileged account, and my .rpmmacros file reads:
%_topdir /home/davidg/rpm
As it should...
Again, any help would be appreciated.
Thanks,
David Gomillion
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
I use Courier IMAP 1.4.3 with KMail 1.7.2 (KDE 3.3.2). If I access
my IMAP account via KMail the first time, a folder named Trash is
automatically created. I was told on the KDE PIM Users ML that KMail
doesn't automatically create folders. So my question
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wednesday 19 January 2005 09:08 am, David Gomillion wrote:
I have been trying to build the RPMs for about a day now, and am not
having much luck.
I am trying to build Courier 0.47 on a CentOS 3.4 system. CentOS is a
RHEL-like OS, much like Whitebox or Tao
I have moved my Courier 0.47 into production. Everything seems to be
going well except...
Every couple of days, everyone on the server has problems using IMAP.
The connections are accepted, but the listing of the mailboxes never
happens. After a couple of minutes, the client will timeout. This
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Dennis Sacks
Sent: Thursday, January 13, 2005 11:52 AM
To: 'Courier-Users '
Subject: Re: [courier-users] Imap Daemon issue
Jay Lee wrote:
Running FC3 means your pretty much on the bleeding
I have been using Courier for some time now, and really like it. So
Sam, good job.
Now I am building RPMs for 0.47 on a fresh install of FC3, updated with
apt. Everything seems to be going OK, and I even get RPM files built.
The problem I am seeing is that no authentication modules are
What you are looking for is the ARCHIVEDIR in courierd. It's documented
in the courierd file (probably in /etc/courier or /usr/lib/courier/etc).
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Abid
Saigol
Sent: Tuesday, November 23, 2004 1:45 PM
To:
Paolo Brutti wrote,
I've been asked by my boss to append to all outgoing messages
a corporate
signature. I seem to remember that the issue has been
discussed here some
time ago, but I've not been able to find the correct
references (SF mail
archives stink...). If I'm not wrong,
Upayavira wrote:
I have installed Courier onto a Debian system, using the
Debian packages
that come with Sarge.
When I send a simple email, using the ESMTP part of Courier,
it delivers
that message into a mbox format file called Maildir in the
user's home
directory. If I create
as root.
HTH,
David Gomillion
---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by OSTG. Have you noticed the changes on
Linux.com, ITManagersJournal and NewsForge in the past few weeks? Now,
one more big change to announce. We are now OSTG- Open Source
I'm not sure exactly the mechanism, but Quica seems to use the MySQL
database to keep what it calls forwards, which act all for the world
like aliases. It appears that it is creating a regular account, and
then creating a .courier file with the address of where the message
should go.
I wanted to
I can say ditto, except that my server did NOT relay the message. If
your server failed on message 6, then it may or may not be an open
relay. Message 6 has the following:
250 Ok
MAIL FROM:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
250 Ok.
RCPT TO:user-(mynumberhere)[EMAIL PROTECTED]
250 Ok.
DATA
354 Ok.
Peter Holm said:
Hi,
is it an unrealistic or unintelligent approach to limit the
amount of mail that can be sent with a server?
Limiting the possibility to send mail to only once per minute
looks to me like a very userfriendly AND abuse-preventing
restriction, that could save many
that I forgot?
Thanks,
David Gomillion
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials.
Become an expert in LINUX or just sharpen your skills. Sign up for IBM's
Free Linux Tutorials. Learn everything from the bash shell to sys admin
Sam Varshavchik wrote:
David Gomillion writes:
In /usr/lib/courier/etc/aliases/lists:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]: |/usr/local/mailman/mail/mailman post
all_employees
The strange thing is not so much that it doesn't work as it sends me
back:
The following recipient(s) could not be reached
Bowie Bailey wrote:
From: David Gomillion [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
The following recipient(s) could not be reached:
'[EMAIL PROTECTED]' on 12/9/2003 2:32 PM
550 User unknown.
Just a stab in the dark here, but did you run 'makealiases' after you
added it?
Yeah, I did
a firewall or NAT somewhere.
I hope that helps,
David Gomillion
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials.
Become an expert in LINUX or just sharpen your skills. Sign up for IBM's
Free Linux Tutorials. Learn everything from the bash
of the tries. I also tried
restarting courier.
I am running userdb with all virtual domains. Only around 100 users.
RedHat 9. Plenty of horsepower.
I'm pretty much stumped. Any help anybody can lend would be
appreciated.
Thanks,
David Gomillion
I took the liberty of attaching 3 REALLY simple scripts to make adding
and removing users easy.
The idea is that I taught one of our administrative assistants
(secretary) to log in to the mail server and type ncuser
[EMAIL PROTECTED] for new users, ncpass [EMAIL PROTECTED] to reset a
password and
What you need to do is set domain1 and domain2 to be hosted domains
instead of local domains.
As soon as you do this, you will have to redo your userdb. The username
will no longer be joe, but [EMAIL PROTECTED] and/or [EMAIL PROTECTED] In this
wise, you can have as many users in as many domains
I had this problem when I had installed it too. It was working really
well from installation until one weekend, the weekend before it went
into production (wouldn't you know it).
As any good systems engineer would do, before the server went onto the
Internet, I installed a firewall. Hmmm, could
I'm not sure what you mean by it not being legal but...
Two ways of doing this come to my mind.
1. Either know all of your user's passwords or create duplicate
accounts for your administrator with the same Maildir. (very bad)
Depending on the number of accounts, this could require significant
to share the inbox for processing incoming mails and whatnot...
Hope this helps,
David
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David
Gomillion
Sent: Tuesday, November 04, 2003 12:17 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [courier-users] How to share
It's not elegant, but...
You could create 2 accounts per user, one under each domain. Have them
have the same $HOME or Maildir. I had this setup once before, although
the logic escapes me why I did.
I have a set of scripts that create my users for userdb, and I just
added a second set of
I can understand the need to have incoming email use either of two
domains, but why can't you educate your users to always use the
real domain for logins? If I received email for [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and [EMAIL PROTECTED], and they both came to the same mailbox, why
would I use one login to check it
I just tripped over the answer in courierd ... sorry.
But this is another plea, is there any way to
automagically attach a text file to every outgoing
message? We have many different email clients, and
some webmail users, so I was hoping to not have to
write docs on how to configure every mail
I seem to remember reading in one of the man pages
about being able to create a copy of all incoming and
outgoing email messages.
I have been wading through the man pages all morning
and have met with very little success. Does anyone
else remember seeing something like this?
And: I am still
the only thing I have seen give this error is when I
have not become superuser. Were you running this as
root?
__
Do you Yahoo!?
The New Yahoo! Shopping - with improved product search
http://shopping.yahoo.com
Sorry to pick up an old thread, but...
I noticed that there was some discussion about putting
a footer on every outgoing message, regardless of
whether or not it was generated via webmail. The
question of why came up. I now have an answer, and
a request.
I don't know how familiar you may be
appreciated.
Thanks,
David Gomillion [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bubblegum and Bailing Wire Engineer
Paid in Bubblegum...
__
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free, easy-to-use web site design software
http://sitebuilder.yahoo.com
58 matches
Mail list logo
