Re: [Crm-sig] NEW ISSUE: Small Edits Checklist

I agree with Philippe that a tracking tool for small edits is a good idea. In my experience translation projects do tend to notice all these small imperfections in the source document. The translator has to figure out what was meant to do the translation. If there is no quick way to document

[Crm-sig] Issue 360 LRMoo, Homework

Hello all, Just a heads up that homework for LRMoo is posted in the Google drive in a directory for Issue 360, and can be seen here: https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1emibzWZuCto2glPpSPEBrgOnbwJCAwji There are a number of sub-parts to be discussed. The hope is that everything that is

Re: [Crm-sig] E-vote for issue 384 (template for family models)

YES. Have not yet applied it to LRMoo, but it should work. I have a question about the list of external properties: in FRBRoo this list included the domains and ranges in the table. I have found that helpful. Is the format of the table perscriptive? Pat Pat Riva Associate University

Re: [Crm-sig] E-vote for issue 493 (example templates)

YES. And just a note that I have tried out these templates on the latest LRMoo working draft, including some fairly complex examples of properties, and have been able to use them. Pat Pat Riva Associate University Librarian, Collection Services (on leave) Concordia University Vanier

[Crm-sig] Issue 360, LRMoo, new working draft, early homework

Hello all, The recent SIG meeting was quite productive for the development of LRMoo and now the latest working draft, v.0.7, including all proposals just accepted in June, is posted on the releases page: http://www.cidoc-crm.org/frbroo/fm_releases This is a consistent draft and is the one that

Re: [Crm-sig] CRM translation working group

I am also interested in participating in this group. I have had experience with managing standards translation for library cataloguing standards and would be able to contribute that perspective. Pat Pat Riva Associate University Librarian, Collection Services (on leave) Concordia University

Re: [Crm-sig] evote: Issue 535 example of Pxxx represents instance of type

Yes Pat Riva Associate University Librarian, Collection Services (on leave) Concordia University Vanier Library (VL-301-61) 7141 Sherbrooke Street West Montreal, QC H4B 1R6 Canada pat.r...@concordia.ca From: Crm-sig on

Re: [Crm-sig] New Issue: Non-human Actors

Just to remark that the library world discussed non-human actors for many years (in the literal sense of actor as in the dogs that portrayed Lassie in the TV series, or that portrayed Sykes and Paddy from Midsomer Murders, somehow it is always cute dogs that are brought up in the discussion).

Re: [Crm-sig] New Issue: Non-human Actors

MzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000=kA1elOx%2BnZrSK8z8AkvhabyJQfHsRUAY%2FpP53dqgvfI%3D=0>000497302960 And so on. Rob On Mon, Oct 11, 2021 at 4:50 PM Pat Riva via Crm-sig mailto:crm-sig@ics.forth.gr>> wrote: Just to remark that the library world discussed non-human actors for many years (in the l

[Crm-sig] Call for e-vote: LRMoo class F27 and property R16

Hello all, Following the discussion of F27 during SIG 52 in February, further work on revised scope notes for F27 and R16 was completed. It is presented here for an e-vote. This vote is in 2 parts: a-F27;

Re: [Crm-sig] CALL FOR E-VOTE ISSUE 581

Yes Pat Riva Associate University Librarian, Collection Services Concordia University Vanier Library (VL-301-61) 7141 Sherbrooke Street West Montreal, QC H4B 1R6 Canada pat.r...@concordia.ca From: Crm-sig on behalf of Martin

Re: [Crm-sig] E-vote for scope note part of issue 294 (CRMarchaeo)

Yes Pat Riva Acting University Librarian / Bibliothécaire en chef par intérim Concordia University / Université Concordia 1455 de Maisonneuve West, LB-331 Montréal, Québec H3G 1M8 Canada pat.r...@concordia.ca From: Crm-sig on behalf of Christian-Emil Smith Ore

[Crm-sig] E-vote: LRMoo F28 Expression Creation

Hello all, Continuing the series of e-votes to complete outstanding homework. Following the discussion of F28 during SIG 52 in February, further editing of the final two paragraphs of the

Re: [Crm-sig] E-vote: LRMoo F28 Expression Creation

...@concordia.ca From: Crm-sig on behalf of Pat Riva via Crm-sig Sent: March 27, 2022 11:22 PM To: CRM-SIG Subject: [Crm-sig] E-vote: LRMoo F28 Expression Creation Hello all, Continuing the series of e-votes to complete outstanding homework. Following

Re: [Crm-sig] Call for e-vote: LRMoo R26

pat.r...@concordia.ca From: Crm-sig on behalf of Pat Riva via Crm-sig Sent: March 20, 2022 4:32 PM To: CRM-SIG Subject: [Crm-sig] Call for e-vote: LRMoo R26 Hello all, Continuing with issues partially discussed but not actually voted at SIG#52 in February

[Crm-sig] E-vote: LRMoo, deprecation of R10 has member

Hello all yet again! Property R10 has member (is member of) was discussed in October 2021, during SIG51. And had been discussed a few times prior to that. However, no vote was taken at SIG51 and

Re: [Crm-sig] Call for e-vote: LRMoo class F27 and property R16

par intérim Concordia University / Université Concordia 1455 de Maisonneuve West, LB-331 Montréal, Québec H3G 1M8 Canada pat.r...@concordia.ca From: Crm-sig on behalf of Pat Riva via Crm-sig Sent: March 8, 2022 6:18 PM To: CRM-SIG Subject: [Crm-sig] Call for e

[Crm-sig] Call for e-vote: LRMoo R26

Hello all, Continuing with issues partially discussed but not actually voted at SIG#52 in February. In the document for Issue 360: HW: F28 Expression Creation, we did not complete the fourth

Re: [Crm-sig] Call for e-vote issue 517

Hi Christian-Emil, I am very late, but I vote yes for the properties as given in the table (with the correction indicated below by Martin). In the document with the changes resulting for the scope notes, I think P86 is supposed to be reflexive, like P89? And P176 should say asymmetric (like

[Crm-sig] LRMoo: review of properties--request for comments

Hello all, The LRMoo WG has done a review of technical aspects of the LRMoo property definitions. Namely, quantifiers, as well as transitivity, symmetry, reflexivity as discussed in recent SIGs for CRMbase. We have found some cases of questionable quantifiers. Finally, we reviewed the handling

[Crm-sig] Call for e-vote: LRMoo, F56 Externalization Event

Hello all, Continuing the series of LRMoo e-votes relating to topics previously discussed at SIG meetings but not voted on. This discussion was held during the October 2021 SIG without a formal vote, but there seemed to be consensus. Proposal: Deprecate the class F56 Externalization Event,

Re: [Crm-sig] New issues: Make SIG meetings more sustainable

I think the tension between in-person and online meetings will remain for some time. That does argue for an annual schedule that has some of each. I think we have found that there are kinds of issues/business that runs well in the Zoom format. I think of specific issues that don't require much

Re: [Crm-sig] New issue: Improve voting process

I can say something about why I don't vote for all issues even when I was present for the discussion. I just don't have expertise in all the many areas covered by the CRM family. If the issue concerns, for example, whether a concept in archaeology has been well captured by a scope note, I will

Re: [Crm-sig] Homework, Issue556

Hi Martin, Thanasis, So far the only IFLA vocabularies that are set up as linked data are here: ISBD: https://www.iflastandards.info/isbd The ISBD vocabularies include several around types of content form or type of medium, but these are more restricted than any of these CRM classes. Unimarc:

Re: [Crm-sig] Call for e-vote: LRMoo, F56 Externalization Event

From: Crm-sig on behalf of Pat Riva via Crm-sig Sent: April 20, 2022 11:57 PM To: CRM-SIG Subject: [Crm-sig] Call for e-vote: LRMoo, F56 Externalization Event Hello all, Continuing the series of LRMoo e-votes relating to topics previously discussed at SIG meetings but not voted

[Crm-sig] Call for e-vote: LRMoo, F29 Recording Event and its properties

Hello all, This is the last in the series of LRMoo e-votes relating to topics previously discussed at SIG meetings but not voted on. This discussion was held during the October 2021 SIG without a formal vote, but there seemed to be consensus. Proposal: Deprecate the class F29 Recording

Re: [Crm-sig] Call for e-vote: LRMoo, F56 Externalization Event

1M8 Canada pat.r...@concordia.ca From: Crm-sig on behalf of Pat Riva via Crm-sig Sent: April 28, 2022 12:29 AM To: CRM-SIG Subject: Re: [Crm-sig] Call for e-vote: LRMoo, F56 Externalization Event For this e-vote that was supposed to close on April 27, I only have

Re: [Crm-sig] Call for e-vote: LRMoo, F29 Recording Event and its properties

From: Crm-sig on behalf of Pat Riva via Crm-sig Sent: April 28, 2022 12:27 AM To: CRM-SIG Subject: [Crm-sig] Call for e-vote: LRMoo, F29 Recording Event and its properties Hello all, This is the last in the series of LRMoo e-votes relating to topics previously discussed at SIG meetings

[Crm-sig] Latest draft LRMoo -- preparation for SIG 54 in Rome

Hello all, The LRMoo WG is pleased to be able to share an "almost" complete draft of LRMoo (v. 0.9), integrating decisions made during SIG 53 in May. We are starting to see the end of the project! You can access this on Google drive:

[Crm-sig] Fw: Until March 31, Invitation for World-wide Review of LRMoo, the object-oriented formulation of the IFLA Library Reference Model

Hello CRM-SIG, We are most particularly interested in hearing from you in this world-wide review. What is missing? Should anything be reformulated? And editorial issues are welcome as well. We expect to bring a follow-up on these results to our May SIG meeting. Please note that we still

[Crm-sig] E-VOTE: LRMoo R10 is member of (has member)

Hello all, I am calling for an e-vote relating to LRMoo. Please vote on the list by July 26th. Background: At the end of SIG meeting #55 in May 2023 in Heraklion, the LRMoo WG presented a sketch of a new approach to R10 after the proposal made at the

[Crm-sig] E-VOTE: LRMoo F31 Performance and properties

Hello all, During the SIG meeting #56 in May 2023 in Heraklion, the LRMoo WG presented a new approach to performances (see here for the document discussed at the meeting under Issue 594). The SIG voted to retain class

Re: [Crm-sig] EXTENDED DEADLINE: E-VOTE: LRMoo R10 is member of (has member)

University Librarian / Bibliothécaire en chef par intérim Concordia University / Université Concordia 1455 de Maisonneuve West, LB-331 Montréal, Québec H3G 1M8 Canada pat.r...@concordia.ca<mailto:pat.r...@concordia.ca> From: Crm-sig on behalf of Pat Riva via Crm-sig

Re: [Crm-sig] EXTENDED DEADLINE: E-VOTE: LRMoo R10 is member of (has member)

n-Emil From: Crm-sig on behalf of Pat Riva via Crm-sig Sent: 29 July 2023 23:17 To: CRM-SIG; Pat Riva Subject: Re: [Crm-sig] EXTENDED DEADLINE: E-VOTE: LRMoo R10 is member of (has member) Hello all, Not having had any votes during this vacation period, I'm ext

[Crm-sig] ICA releases stable version of Records in Contexts v. 1.0

I saw this interesting news: https://www.ica.org/en/release-of-the-first-three-parts-of-the-records-in-contexts-archival-description-standard-version-10 RiC 1.0 is just out. I've only had a very quick look but it's come a long way. There are links for the RiC-FAD Foundations of Archival