eet. They
may therefore be overridden by subsequent style sheet rules" -
<http://www.w3.org/TR/2011/REC-CSS2-20110607/cascade.html#preshint>
Cheers,
Nick.
--
Nick Fitzsimons
http://www.nickfitz.co.uk/
@NickFitz
working for me at http://www.htmldog.com/articles/suckerfish/.
--
Nick Fitzsimons
http://www.nickfitz.co.uk/
__
css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css
. The value of the src attribute
specifies the URI of the image that will decorate the button. For
accessibility reasons, authors should provide alternate text for the
image via the alt attribute.
Regards,
Nick.
--
Nick Fitzsimons
http://www.nickfitz.co.uk
inappropriate or has been excluded in the original question),
but to have it happening on css-d... I despair.
More in sorrow than anger,
Nick.
--
Nick Fitzsimons
http://www.nickfitz.co.uk/
__
css-discuss [cs...@lists.css-discuss.org]
http
its two components...
Regards,
Nick.
--
Nick Fitzsimons
http://www.nickfitz.co.uk/
__
css-discuss [cs...@lists.css-discuss.org]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com
that property to IE6 (and IE7, if that also
struggles).
HTH,
Nick.
--
Nick Fitzsimons
http://www.nickfitz.co.uk/
__
css-discuss [cs...@lists.css-discuss.org]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http
.
--
Nick Fitzsimons
http://www.nickfitz.co.uk/
__
css-discuss [cs...@lists.css-discuss.org]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
List policies -- http://css-discuss.org
Cheers,
Nick.
--
Nick Fitzsimons
http://www.nickfitz.co.uk/
__
css-discuss [cs...@lists.css-discuss.org]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
List policies -- http
thing (for the example you give) using
CSS2.1 adjacent-sibling selectors [1]:
p + ul {
font-style: italic;
}
[1] http://www.w3.org/TR/CSS21/selector.html#adjacent-selectors
Cheers,
Nick.
--
Nick Fitzsimons
http://www.nickfitz.co.uk
On Thu, March 26, 2009 2:03 pm, Climis, Tim wrote:
Unless I'm misreading the spec, that would match the ul and make my list
text italicized, which isn't what I want. I want to match the p.
DOH! Yes, I fail - sorry :-(
Well, it is lunchtime...
--
Nick Fitzsimons
http://www.nickfitz.co.uk
/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
--
Nick Fitzsimons
http://www.nickfitz.co.uk
://www.nickfitz.co.uk/bugs/browsers/css/IE-Win/ie_percent_test.html
Regards,
Nick.
--
Nick Fitzsimons
http://www.nickfitz.co.uk/
__
css-discuss [cs...@lists.css-discuss.org]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ
- a pixel is an
indivisible thing, so you should just set the size of the border to be 1px
- either the browser will round it up to 1px or round it down to 0px, when
it becomes invisible.
HTH,
Nick.
--
Nick Fitzsimons
http://www.nickfitz.co.uk
fallback content for such lesser browsers as
Netscape 3 and 4. Now that the roles are reversed, simply read downlevel
as uplevel and vice versa, and it should make sense ;-)
Regards,
Nick.
--
Nick Fitzsimons
http://www.nickfitz.co.uk
in a format it can cope with.
Regards,
Nick.
--
Nick Fitzsimons
http://www.nickfitz.co.uk/
__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
List
development community is to inform them of these issues.
http://blogs.msdn.com/ie/archive/2008/03/05/ie8-beta-feedback.aspx
Regards,
Nick.
--
Nick Fitzsimons
http://www.nickfitz.co.uk/
__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http
be accurate enough :-)
HTH,
Nick.
--
Nick Fitzsimons
http://www.nickfitz.co.uk/
__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
List policies
reliable way of communicating with them than expecting
them to go off and check somebody else's wiki every day on the offchance
there's something new there :-)
Cheers,
Nick.
--
Nick Fitzsimons
http://www.nickfitz.co.uk/
__
css
of existing and
known-good code for the work on IE 8, and this CSS-comment -parsing bug
has crept in along with the good stuff?
Just a thought...
Regards,
Nick.
--
Nick Fitzsimons
http://www.nickfitz.co.uk/
__
css-discuss [EMAIL
.
Regards,
Nick.
--
Nick Fitzsimons
http://www.nickfitz.co.uk/
__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
List policies -- http://css-discuss.org
.
In the one fix you give of...
html {font-size: 100%;}
body {font-size: 1em;}
Wouldn't that second BODY declaration be considered a font-size keyword?
Absolute and relative font-size keywords, CSS 2.1:
http://www.w3.org/TR/CSS21/fonts.html#value-def-absolute-size
HTH,
Nick.
--
Nick
cheeky as to auto-correct it (pun
inevitable, I'm afraid) to something else, it won't be a problem.
Regards,
Nick.
--
Nick Fitzsimons
http://www.nickfitz.co.uk/
__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman
of an
element's style attribute are style sheet rules. These rules have
no selectors, so a=1, b=0, c=0, and d=0.)
http://www.w3.org/TR/CSS21/cascade.html#specificity
So the style attribute on the a has a specificity of 1000,
overriding the 101 of the stylesheet rule.
HTH,
Nick.
--
Nick Fitzsimons
http
are encountering.
You could use one of the usual methods, preferably a conditional
comment, to give IE6 height: 400px; as IE 6 treats height as min-
height.
HTH,
Nick.
--
Nick Fitzsimons
http://www.nickfitz.co.uk/
__
css-discuss [EMAIL
#collapsing-margins
Regards,
Nick.
--
Nick Fitzsimons
http://www.nickfitz.co.uk/
__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
List policies
On 27 Sep 2007, at 14:40, Mark Story wrote:
Nick Fitzsimons wrote:
On 27 Sep 2007, at 14:04, Scott Povlot wrote:
If I don't have a border, what is the difference
between using padding or margin to add space around an
element? Is there any reason to choose one over the
other?
Vertical
?
Not a fool, and not _obviously_ wrong; matters of specificity have
tripped up everybody at some point, I think. (It still gets me on a
regular basis...)
HTH,
Nick.
--
Nick Fitzsimons
http://www.nickfitz.co.uk/
__
css-discuss [EMAIL
for those interested: http://nightly.webkit.org/
Regards,
Nick.
--
Nick Fitzsimons
http://www.nickfitz.co.uk/
__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css
redundant in the finished
product. It's the same with Safari 3; the time to start testing _our_
work is when the final version is released. Until that date we are
testing _Apple's_ work.
Regards,
Nick.
--
Nick Fitzsimons
http://www.nickfitz.co.uk
you can learn how to do a simple
header/two columns/footer layout like this.
HTH,
Nick.
--
Nick Fitzsimons
http://www.nickfitz.co.uk/
__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki
On 19 Sep 2007, at 18:50, Nick Fitzsimons wrote:
But you shouldn't use tables for layout.
Ah, just seen your earlier post about this being for an HTML
newsletter; forget what I said. For HTML email, it looks like we're
stuck with tables for the foreseeable future.
Incidentally
the client beautifully smooth designs which were not, in
reality, achieveable in a web browser on Windows.
Regards,
Nick.
--
Nick Fitzsimons
http://www.nickfitz.co.uk/
__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css-discuss.org
on Windows.
Thats a very good idea, I will suggest it, I think it'll go
down like a lead
balloon with our design team.
They do tend to whine about it rather a lot, in my experience :D
Regards,
Nick.
--
Nick Fitzsimons
http://www.nickfitz.co.uk
a
!important rule elsewhere (which would be the only way to override the
specificity of that attribute), that DOM property would remain unchanged,
because it reflects what was in the page source, not the computed style.
Regards,
Nick.
--
Nick Fitzsimons
http://www.nickfitz.co.uk
Eric :-)
http://meyerweb.com/eric/thoughts/2005/05/31/universal-child-replacement/
Regards,
Nick.
--
Nick Fitzsimons
http://www.nickfitz.co.uk/
__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
Eric :-)
http://meyerweb.com/eric/thoughts/2005/05/31/universal-child-replacement/
Regards,
Nick.
--
Nick Fitzsimons
http://www.nickfitz.co.uk/
__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
in IE 6, is to throw it
away and start again. Trying to go in the direction of getting IE
6-compatible CSS to work in proper browsers is the road to insanity.
Regards,
Nick.
--
Nick Fitzsimons
http://www.nickfitz.co.uk/
__
css
From: Rafael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Nick Fitzsimons wrote:
Although top 5% is invalid, that's only because the
horizontal position
must come first if one of the values is not a keyword;
so 5% top or left
23px are valid. However, for clarity, I tend to use
either
. However, for clarity, I tend to use either just keywords or
just units, rather than mixing them together: 0 23px, for example.
Regards,
Nick.
--
Nick Fitzsimons
http://www.nickfitz.co.uk/
__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http
,
or how CSS can be used to style them. User agents may apply CSS properties
to these elements. Authors are recommended to treat such support as
experimental.
http://www.w3.org/TR/CSS21/conform.html#conformance
Regards,
Nick.
--
Nick Fitzsimons
http://www.nickfitz.co.uk
content that
you're having problems with.
Regards,
Nick.
--
Nick Fitzsimons
http://www.nickfitz.co.uk/
__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
IE7 information -- http://css
is probably the single most common misconception about
assistive technologies. They can and do interface to IE and Firefox, but
they are used for a lot more than that.
Regards,
Nick.
--
Nick Fitzsimons
http://www.nickfitz.co.uk
... although none of those extended colour
names appear in any formal spec relating to CSS, so that's OT.
Regards,
Nick.
--
Nick Fitzsimons
http://www.nickfitz.co.uk/
__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css-discuss.org
On 30 Mar 2007, at 14:26:14, Bjoern Hoehrmann wrote:
* Nick Fitzsimons wrote:
Incidentally, the gray/grey issue isn't helped by the fact that
Netscape Navigator had an extensive list of colour names, which
included both gray and lightgrey - the story I heard back in the
day
the browser whose notions get enforced.
Opera has a minimum font size enabled by default, so playing with 1px
text is never going to work with the default settings in that
browser. This is why most people recommend using other techniques.
Regards,
Nick.
--
Nick Fitzsimons
http://www.nickfitz.co.uk
: 0;
padding: 0;
}
and see if it helps.
HTH,
Nick.
--
Nick Fitzsimons
http://www.nickfitz.co.uk/
__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
IE7b2 testing hub -- http://css
Windows on it using Bootcamp.
Cheers,
Nick.
--
Nick Fitzsimons
http://www.nickfitz.co.uk/
__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
IE7b2 testing hub -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/?page
it very lucidly :-( If it remains unclear,
I'll try to find a better way to explain.
Cheers,
Nick.
--
Nick Fitzsimons
http://www.nickfitz.co.uk/
__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
to each individual column, rather
than to the group of columns, otherwise the two cases above would not
be equivalent.
HTH,
Nick.
--
Nick Fitzsimons
http://www.nickfitz.co.uk/
__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http
and therefore would not be expected to map to anything in CSS.
Regards,
Nick.
--
Nick Fitzsimons
http://www.nickfitz.co.uk/
__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
IE7b2 testing hub -- http
). This is discussed near the end of Doug Bowman's Sliding
Doors article at:
http://alistapart.com/articles/slidingdoors/
where you'll find a hack which works for his example; I don't know if
it would be suitable for your case.
Cheers,
Nick.
--
Nick Fitzsimons
http://www.nickfitz.co.uk
in that, too: if you
have problems, somebody here will help :-)
Cheers,
Nick.
--
Nick Fitzsimons
http://www.nickfitz.co.uk/
__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
IE7b2 testing hub -- http
be, but this might help you to work out what's happening.
If you don't need that header, just take it out of the page :-)
HTH,
Nick.
--
Nick Fitzsimons
http://www.nickfitz.co.uk/
__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css
application.
HTH,
Nick.
--
Nick Fitzsimons
http://www.nickfitz.co.uk/
__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
IE7b2 testing hub -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/?page=IE7
List wiki/FAQ
of normal users would see. Have a
look at
http://archivist.incutio.com/viewlist/css-discuss/72983
in the list archives.
HTH,
Nick.
--
Nick Fitzsimons
http://www.nickfitz.co.uk/
__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css
strict rendering (standards-compliant mode in
MS-speak) for HTML 4.01 Transitional, if (as is the case here) the URL
is in the DOCTYPE:
http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/en-us/dnie60/html/cssenhancements.asp?frame=true#cssenhancements_topic2
Cheers,
Nick.
--
Nick Fitzsimons
http
going to miss...
Cheers,
Nick.
--
Nick Fitzsimons
http://www.nickfitz.co.uk/
__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
IE7b2 testing hub -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/?page=IE7
List
JavaScript techniques/behaviors/etc. which are around are ways
to automate the above process by dynamically creating and assigning the
IE-only CSS rules, but won't work if JavaScript is disabled.
HTH,
Nick.
--
Nick Fitzsimons
http://www.nickfitz.co.uk
jog fix on the home page, but
not on the other pages.
HTH,
Nick.
--
Nick Fitzsimons
http://www.nickfitz.co.uk/
__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
IE7b2 testing hub -- http://css
.)
Probably OT for css-d... ah well :-)
HTH,
Nick.
--
Nick Fitzsimons
http://www.nickfitz.co.uk/
__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
IE7b2 testing hub -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/?page
related posts in the archives; see
http://www.google.co.uk/search?q=site%3Aarchivist.incutio.com+background+image+ie+flicker
HTH,
Nick.
--
Nick Fitzsimons
http://www.nickfitz.co.uk/
__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http
box, you can set it back to Times New
Roman or whatever and all will be well.
As to how such an inappropriate font got selected in the first place:
who knows. Could one of your mates be trying to wind you up? :-)
HTH,
Nick.
--
Nick Fitzsimons
http://www.nickfitz.co.uk
margins
pAs will this paragraph/p
/form
/div
/div
It could be done using child selectors rather than descendant selectors:
.col* { margin-left: 15px; margin-right: 15px; }
but they aren't supported by IE 6 down, so this provides a workaround.
HTH,
Nick.
--
Nick Fitzsimons
http
the option to none when experimenting with this a
while back, so maybe it's 10px, as you suggest.
Cheers,
Nick.
--
Nick Fitzsimons
http://www.nickfitz.co.uk/
__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman
.
Looks like the doubled float margin bug on the first page:
http://positioniseverything.net/explorer/doubled-margin.html
Try putting display: inline; on #divflottant.
HTH,
Nick.
--
Nick Fitzsimons
http://www.nickfitz.co.uk/
__
css
.
(Well, he'd have to switch over to his screen reader, but that only
currently works with IE, so he'd have to fire that up, then paste the
URL... you get the idea.)
HTH,
Nick.
--
Nick Fitzsimons
http://www.nickfitz.co.uk
the definition of each of those properties and see
what it means in that context.
For your final question, cj has already answered it, so I won't bother :-)
HTH,
Nick.
--
Nick Fitzsimons
http://www.nickfitz.co.uk/
__
css-discuss [EMAIL
a demo here:
http://www.nickfitz.co.uk/bugs/browsers/css/IE-Win/ie_percent_test.html
HTH,
Nick.
--
Nick Fitzsimons
http://www.nickfitz.co.uk/
__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
aware of the 0.92px, it's still
smaller than you would expect.)
Regards,
Nick.
--
Nick Fitzsimons
http://www.nickfitz.co.uk/
__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
IE7b2 testing hub
want to know:
http://weblogs.mozillazine.org/hyatt/archives/2005_05.html#007507
Short answer: yes :-)
HTH,
Nick.
--
Nick Fitzsimons
http://www.nickfitz.co.uk/
__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman
worth. Your mileage may vary, of course.
Cheers,
Nick.
--
Nick Fitzsimons
http://www.nickfitz.co.uk/
__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
IE7b2 testing hub -- http://css
Bill Brown wrote:
!--[if gte IE 5]
It's not a good idea to use gte IE 5 in this conditional comment, as
IE 7 is capable of displaying background PNGs, and hacks should only be
applied as necessary. Use lte IE 6 instead.
Regards,
Nick.
--
Nick Fitzsimons
http://www.nickfitz.co.uk
I and every other programmer in the
world make all the time :-)
You might want to add the above CSS 2.1 reference to your bug report at
the IE feedback site, just so they know.
Cheers,
Nick.
--
Nick Fitzsimons
http://www.nickfitz.co.uk
Nick Fitzsimons wrote:
At a guess, their code for implementing adjacent selectors (which is
part of the new IE 7 code and thus not yet thoroughly testes)
TESTED! I meant TESTED, dammit!
Hell of a Freudian slip though...
Nick.
--
Nick Fitzsimons
http://www.nickfitz.co.uk
=/workshop/author/dhtml/overview/ccomment_ovw.asp
[3]http://msdn.microsoft.com/workshop/author/dhtml/reference/properties/haslayout.asp
[4]http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/default.asp?url=/library/en-us/ietechcol/cols/dnexpie/expie20050831.asp
HTH,
Nick.
--
Nick Fitzsimons
http://www.nickfitz.co.uk
On 12 Apr 2006, at 19:31, Paul Seale wrote:
Here is an example. The CSS validates. Help would be great.
http://www.wrightforauditor.com/aboutmark.asp
Thanks.
Have you fixed this? It looks fine one my Mac with Safari 2.0.3
(417.9.2).
Regards,
Nick.
--
Nick Fitzsimons
http
of the
dialogs and you'll then find the images are fetched from the cache
correctly.
Automatically is the factory setting and the only people who ever
change it are web developers; so normal people will see the site as you
intended anyway.
HTH,
Nick.
--
Nick Fitzsimons
http
and valid, you should keep the above CSS in a separate
file, linked within an IE conditional comment:
!--[if lte IE 6]
link rel=stylesheet type=text/css hrefie-win-fixes.css
![endif]--
HTH,
Nick.
--
Nick Fitzsimons
http://www.nickfitz.co.uk
time I checked there was only one real
problem on IE/Mac. (That was a while ago though.) Safari should be OK,
although I'll have to wait until I get home at the weekend to properly
debug any problems there.
TIA,
Nick.
--
Nick Fitzsimons
http://www.nickiftz.co.uk
housetrained.
Cheers,
Nick.
--
Nick Fitzsimons
http://www.nickfitz.co.uk/
__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
IE7b2 testing hub -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/?page=IE7
List wiki/FAQ
of the problems people are
reporting in the Beta Preview.
So don't worry about it. Just send your bug report via one of the
mechanisms described on the IE Team blog:
http://blogs.msdn.com/ie/archive/2006/01/31/520817.aspx
Regards,
Nick.
--
Nick Fitzsimons
http://www.nickfitz.co.uk
.
--
Nick Fitzsimons
http://www.nickfitz.co.uk/
__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
IE7b2 testing hub -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/?page=IE7
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css
%;
}
body
{
height: 100%;
}
#nonFooter
{
position: relative;
min-height: 100%;
}
* html #nonFooter
{
height: 100%;
}
#footer
{
position: relative;
margin-top: -7.5em;
}
which seems like a pretty simple template with layout CSS and no element
styling :-)
Cheers,
Nick.
--
Nick Fitzsimons
http
;
}
* html #nonFooter
{
height: 100%;
}
#footer
{
position: relative;
margin-top: -7.5em;
background-color: #600;
height: 7.5em;
}
HTH,
Nick.
--
Nick Fitzsimons
http://www.nickfitz.co.uk/
__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http
to explicitly add that.
Cheers,
Nick.
--
Nick Fitzsimons
http://www.nickfitz.co.uk/
__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
IE7b2 testing hub -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/?page=IE7
List
-bp.co.uk/home/]
should point you to the answer: you are using li where you apparently
meant div on your search section.
HTH,
Nick.
--
Nick Fitzsimons
http://www.nickfitz.co.uk/
__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css
/index.htm
Sounds like the IE 3 pixel text jog:
http://positioniseverything.net/explorer/threepxtest.html
HTH,
Nick.
--
Nick Fitzsimons
http://www.nickfitz.co.uk/
__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css-discuss.org
;-)
But seriously, do persevere; I must have spent a couple of years really
getting my head round CSS, but finally I can (most days) get it to do what
I want.
Best of luck,
Nick.
--
Nick Fitzsimons
http://www.nickfitz.co.uk/
__
css
Oh, I should point out that the clear: both; in the .myBit rule was just
to get my stuff on a level playing field beneath your bit; if you want to
float several such boxes next to each other, you'll want to remove it:
.myBit {
clear: both; -- You probably don't want this
rest
but normal people don't see it. See
http://archivist.incutio.com/viewlist/css-discuss/66818
in the list archives.
Nick.
--
Nick Fitzsimons
http://www.nickfitz.co.uk/
__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman
Nick Fitzsimons wrote:
Mikhail Bozgounov wrote:
Just a general question concerning CSS rollovers:
You remember, that in *some cases* IE tries to download a CSS
image background EVERY TIME you mouse over the link! This
could happen even in cases when you use only ONE image for
both normal
Oops, spoke too soon. Indeed, the effect is gone when I set my IE
to check for new versions of pages on automatic. So, all those
people causing these many lines in my log were developers?
Possible I guess.
Thanks for the explanation, and sorry for the too quick reply :-)
--
Els
No
site I'm currently working on.
If IE5/Win is important to you (which your site's user agent stats can
tell you) then go for the traditional Holly Hack with height: 1%; and
use conditional comments to make sure IE7 doesn't get its hands on it.
HTH,
Nick.
--
Nick Fitzsimons
http
http, and I had the same
issues with IE-Mac.
For images, one trick is to use the View image (or whatever it says)
context menu item, then force a proper reload, then hit the back button.
Regards,
Nick.
--
Nick Fitzsimons
http://www.nickfitz.co.uk
://www.w3.org/TR/html4/types.html#type-id
[2]
http://www.bea.com/framework.jsp?CNT=index.htmFP=/content/products/weblogic
HTH,
Nick.
--
Nick Fitzsimons
http://www.nickfitz.co.uk/
__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css
elements etc. in
your page to cause the PiE bug.
HTH,
Nick.
--
Nick Fitzsimons
http://www.nickfitz.co.uk/
__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
IE7b2 testing hub -- http://css
the consequences of that mistake, and you
don't want to make it.
[Ref. 1]
http://msdn.microsoft.com/workshop/author/dhtml/overview/ccomment_ovw.asp
Regards,
Nick.
--
Nick Fitzsimons
http://www.nickfitz.co.uk/
__
css-discuss [EMAIL
knowledge, and is therefore worthless.
Regards,
Nick.
--
Nick Fitzsimons
http://www.nickfitz.co.uk/
__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
IE7b2 testing hub -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com
there is no scrollbar at all.
Sounds like the unscrollable content bug:
http://www.positioniseverything.net/explorer/unscrollable.html
HTH,
Nick.
--
Nick Fitzsimons
http://www.nickfitz.co.uk/
__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http
and aren't in this beta.
HTH,
Nick.
[1]
http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/default.asp?url=/library/en-us/IETechCol/cols/dnexpie/ie7_css_compat.asp?frame=truehidetoc=true
(just after the subheading Working around overflow:visible default
behavior)
[2] http://msdn.microsoft.com/ie/
--
Nick Fitzsimons
1 - 100 of 150 matches
Mail list logo