Re: [css-d] Site check please IE9/10

On 11/09/2013 7:01 PM, Albert van der Veen wrote: Thanks for the feedback, had it fixed. Turned out to be a problem with closing a tag. I closed it like this: which completely(!) messed up the page. Now it's closed this way and everything's fine :) I'm aware of the validation errors, there

Re: [css-d] Site check please IE9/10

Thanks for the feedback, had it fixed. Turned out to be a problem with closing a tag. I closed it like this: which completely(!) messed up the page. Now it's closed this way class="searchbutton" > and everything's fine :) I'm aware of the validation errors, there's a div that's not closed.

Re: [css-d] Site check please IE9/10

Albert, I'm not seeing your problem. Have your fixed it? > On September 3, 2013 at 8:20 AM Albert van der Veen > wrote: > > > Hi all, > > I'm working on a new site and just found out it looks (and works, as you > can't even click any link) awful in IE8/9 and good in IE10. Can anyone > see whethe

Re: [css-d] Site check please IE9/10

David, I really don't see how the three HTML errors would case his problem. And, you might want to check the CSS before running a validation. He's using CSS3 that validation does not appear to have been run under CSS3 but rather CSS2.1 making the error irrelevant. And, even if they were the only t

Re: [css-d] Site check please IE9/10

On Tue, 03 Sep 2013 14:20:01 +0200, Albert van der Veen wrote: | Hi all, | | I'm working on a new site and just found out it looks (and works, as you | can't even click any link) awful in IE8/9 and good in IE10. Can anyone | see whether IE8/9 are choking on something that IE10 has no problems

[css-d] Site check please IE9/10

Hi all, I'm working on a new site and just found out it looks (and works, as you can't even click any link) awful in IE8/9 and good in IE10. Can anyone see whether IE8/9 are choking on something that IE10 has no problems with? I can't imagine css differences between IE9 and 10 being so huge i

Re: [css-d] site check please

On Sun, May 20, 2012 at 6:00 AM, Erik Visser wrote: > > I hope i will get an overview of how this site works/acts on different > browsers and platforms. > > http://beta.sterrenhofje.nl > > Thank you, Erik Visser > The pages in the site seem to perform as expected in a Windows notebook in the cu

Re: [css-d] site check please

> Can you please view this website and give me your comments? > Especially from technical point of view. > Any quirks or strange behaviour or whatever? > > I hope i will get an overview of how this site works/acts on different > browsers and platforms. > > http://beta.sterrenhofje.nl If you wi

[css-d] site check please

Can you please view this website and give me your comments? Especially from technical point of view. Any quirks or strange behaviour or whatever? I hope i will get an overview of how this site works/acts on different browsers and platforms. http://beta.sterrenhofje.nl Thank you, Erik Visser _

Re: [css-d] site check www.wecweddings.com

Noah Learner wrote: > Hi All, > > I have just made http://www.wecweddings.com live. Any usability feedback is > greatly appreciated especially on mobile devices. > > Many Thanks, > > Noah Learner > I see no grave CSS problem in your site cross-browser in a laptop other than the shift-left of

[css-d] site check www.wecweddings.com

Hi All, I have just made http://www.wecweddings.com live. Any usability feedback is greatly appreciated especially on mobile devices. Many Thanks, Noah Learner LEARNER DESIGN www.learnerdesign.com 9 Lewis Court | Nantucket, MA 02554 508.325.6626 LEAVE YOUR MARK*

Re: [css-d] Site check please

Ed Goodson wrote: >> > >> http://www.copywritecolombia.com/test.html >> >> >> > I do have an issue on IE though at the moment, the text string: Header2 and > the text below is not showing within the confines of the grey background > image. How can I mak

Re: [css-d] Site check please

> > > > - Original Message - From: "Theresa Mesa" > > To: "Norman Fournier" > Cc: "CSS Discuss" > Sent: Saturday, November 07, 2009 8:20 PM > Subject: Re: [css-d] Site check please > > >> Well, according to your source code,

Re: [css-d] Site check please

> - Original Message - > From: "Theresa Mesa" > To: "Norman Fournier" > Cc: "CSS Discuss" > Sent: Saturday, November 07, 2009 8:20 PM > Subject: Re: [css-d] Site check please > > >> Well, according to your source code, ther

Re: [css-d] Site check please

right place? Thank-you very much, Kind Regards, Ed - Original Message - From: "Theresa Mesa" To: "Norman Fournier" Cc: "CSS Discuss" Sent: Saturday, November 07, 2009 8:20 PM Subject: Re: [css-d] Site check please > Well, according to your sour

Re: [css-d] Site check please

Well, according to your source code, there's supposed to be a logo there, called LOGO.jpg. Doesn't look like the image is on the server. Did you upload the images folder to the server? Is the logo in the images folder? Theresa On Nov 5, 2009, at 3:01 PM, Norman Fournier wrote: > Safari 4.

Re: [css-d] Site check please

What kind of things are you looking for us to find? On Nov 4, 2009, at 3:16 PM, Ed Goodson wrote: > Hi all, > Please could someone kindly test this on IE- especially 6. It looks > fine to me on ff > The page is tentatively passed xhtml strict. > http://www.copywritecolombia.com/test.html > > T

Re: [css-d] Site check please

"Hi all, Please could someone kindly test this on IE- especially 6. It looks fine to me on ff The page is tentatively passed xhtml strict. http://www.copywritecolombia.com/test.html"; Seems to look the same for me in FF and IE 6 on windows. Posted screen shot here for IE6 for you: http://www.k

[css-d] Site check please

Hi all, Please could someone kindly test this on IE- especially 6. It looks fine to me on ff The page is tentatively passed xhtml strict. http://www.copywritecolombia.com/test.html Thank-you very much, Cheers, Ed __ css-discuss

Re: [css-d] Site Check

Sometimes it's not the designer, it's the client. Since it's their money, ultimately it's their decision. The designer can try to direct them, advise them, cajole them, but the client will get what the client wants, in the end. On Oct 9, 2009, at 11:43 AM, JG wrote: > While I agree, its as

Re: [css-d] Site Check

While I agree, its ashame that many designers choose the rigid "My size", without thinking about the user, and feel its more important to make the screen look "beautiful". On the other hand, I applaud sites like Yahoo that attempt to keep the control in the hands of the user. Perhaps the only time

Re: [css-d] Site Check

On 2009/10/08 16:39 (GMT-0400) David McGlone composed: > On Wed, 2009-10-07 at 00:49 -0400, Felix Miata wrote: >> Even in Firefox it needs some work to take it towards resolution >> independence.[...] > Do you have any pointers on how I can accomplish this? I've only been > using CSS for about a

Re: [css-d] Site Check

David McGlone wrote: > On Wed, 2009-10-07 at 00:49 -0400, Felix Miata wrote: > >> On 2009/10/06 18:44 (GMT-0400) David McGlone composed: >> >> >>> Hi all, Can I get a site check @ http://www.premierfirst.org >>> >>> I only have Firefox and Opera and IE 8. I am suspecting my images in

Re: [css-d] Site Check

On Wed, 2009-10-07 at 00:49 -0400, Felix Miata wrote: > On 2009/10/06 18:44 (GMT-0400) David McGlone composed: > > > Hi all, Can I get a site check @ http://www.premierfirst.org > > > I only have Firefox and Opera and IE 8. I am suspecting my images in the > > top left are going to be messed up i

Re: [css-d] Site Check

Chris Blake wrote: > Hi, > > http://www.redrunner.co.uk/rr/ > > Battling with Drupal and Javascript, but it's getting there. Let me > know of any problems and if you have any fixes for them. There are a > few niggles in IE7, but nothing major as far as I can see. > > Cheers, Chris > Let

[css-d] Site Check

Hi, http://www.redrunner.co.uk/rr/ Battling with Drupal and Javascript, but it's getting there. Let me know of any problems and if you have any fixes for them. There are a few niggles in IE7, but nothing major as far as I can see. Cheers, Chris _

Re: [css-d] Site Check

On 2009/10/06 18:44 (GMT-0400) David McGlone composed: > Hi all, Can I get a site check @ http://www.premierfirst.org > I only have Firefox and Opera and IE 8. I am suspecting my images in the > top left are going to be messed up in IE6, but I'm pretty confident the > layout should be good across

Re: [css-d] Site Check

David McGlone wrote: > Hi all, Can I get a site check @ http://www.premierfirst.org > > I only have Firefox and Opera and IE 8. I am suspecting my images in the > top left are going to be messed up in IE6, but I'm pretty confident the > layout should be good across all browsers. > > Blessings > Dav

Re: [css-d] Site Check

Hi, In IE6 it falls apart. Sidebar is pushed down below of contents and the top photo disappears. I also think that the top title lacks some contrast. The red one over the blue grayish background. HTH. Roberto David McGlone wrote: > Hi all, Can I get a site check @ http://www.premierfirst.org

Re: [css-d] Site Check

> >Hi all, Can I get a site check @ http://www.premierfirst.org > > > >I only have Firefox and Opera and IE 8. I am suspecting my images in > the > >top left are going to be messed up in IE6, but I'm pretty confident > the > >layout should be good across all browsers. > > > >Blessings > >David M.

Re: [css-d] Site Check

Hi David, I looked at it on a Mac using Opera, Firefox, and Safari. It looked fine in all three. I did notice you may have an "s" missing from your "All Right Reserved" in your footer. Site looks nice and clean. Louise On 10/6/09, David McGlone wrote: >Hi all, Can I get a site check @ htt

[css-d] Site Check

Hi all, Can I get a site check @ http://www.premierfirst.org I only have Firefox and Opera and IE 8. I am suspecting my images in the top left are going to be messed up in IE6, but I'm pretty confident the layout should be good across all browsers. Blessings David M.

[css-d] Site check imprimerie-salfati.fr

Hi : Thanks in advance for all those who can or will take a few moments to see how it works in yours browsers. I'm thinking too to redesign the whole site (well, its not a great site, only a few dynamic pages with a CMS system, SPIP) using Tripoli http://devkick.com/lab/tripoli/ Has someone e

Re: [css-d] Site check please

David Laakso wrote: > Lorraine Barte Nepomuceno wrote: > >> Hi David, >> >> Can you reload the page? I've made some changes (I think my >> calculations for layout size were wrong :-))... please let me know if >> it's better now: >> >> http://www.splashscreen.com/sample/sample.html >> >> thanks

Re: [css-d] Site check please

On Fri, Jul 17, 2009 at 10:18 PM, David Laakso wrote: > David Laakso wrote: > > Lorraine, > > Getting your page functional in IE 6/7 required hacking it from here to > Havana. And it still was not right. If you need to keep your current markup, > then someone else on the list may provide a better

Re: [css-d] Site check please

Lorraine Barte Nepomuceno wrote: > Hi guys, > > So far, I've tested this layout in Mac Firefox & Safari, and Windows Firefox > & IE8. I'd love any feedback you might have- especially viewed in other > browsers and resolutions. > > http://www.splashscreen.com/sample/sample.html > > Thanks very much,

Re: [css-d] Site check please

Lorraine Barte Nepomuceno wrote: > Hi David, > > Can you reload the page? I've made some changes (I think my > calculations for layout size were wrong :-))... please let me know if > it's better now: > > http://www.splashscreen.com/sample/sample.html > > thanks very much > Lorraine > For a lot

Re: [css-d] Site check please

Lorraine Barte Nepomuceno wrote: > Thanks for your reply, David- although I do admit I am confused by > some of it... what are "rivers"? I'd appreciate any ideas you might > have on what I've done wrong in my CSS as well... thanks again :) > > Lorraine > Think of the text-block as a piece of f

Re: [css-d] Site check please

On Thu, Jul 16, 2009 at 2:57 PM, Lorraine Barte Nepomuceno wrote: > > So far, I've tested this layout in Mac Firefox & Safari, and Windows Firefox > & IE8. I'd love any feedback you might have- especially viewed in other > browsers and resolutions. > > http://www.splashscreen.com/sample/sample.html

[css-d] Site check please

Hi guys, So far, I've tested this layout in Mac Firefox & Safari, and Windows Firefox & IE8. I'd love any feedback you might have- especially viewed in other browsers and resolutions. http://www.splashscreen.com/sample/sample.html Thanks very much, Lorraine __

Re: [css-d] site check in IE + background image issue

On Mon, Jul 6, 2009 at 10:12 AM, Ron Zisman wrote:> > i'm also having issues with a background image (a slight gradation on > the red background) > You should try to use much higher resolution for the background image if you want to see a more smooth gradation in the background. What you see in ph

[css-d] site check in IE + background image issue

http://www.beaverdamgallery.com hey all, i've cobbled together what i thought was an ultra simple site, but IE has been playing havoc with my simplicity. a fellow list member has tried to straighten me out (thanks), and i think i'm home, but ask for a check. i'm also having issues with a b

Re: [css-d] site check, particularly on ie6 ?

snak detek+0r wrote: > >> >> Nothing "silly" about that page in my humble opinion. The page is >> "short" because there is not much content on it. If you want it, and >> other pages that may have little content, to appear deeper-- get >> creative and add a generic image beneath the text of same.

Re: [css-d] site check, particularly on ie6 ?

On 2009/05/31 19:19 (GMT-0400) snak detek+0r composed: > Since I'm still trying to get my mind around this (and the w3 rules are > quite hard to parse IMO), I was just playing around with my own styles > when I noticed that the original base line-height value for this project > was set using %:

Re: [css-d] site check, particularly on ie6 ?

snak detek+0r wrote: > >> > > Oh, I understand what you're suggesting now. And yes, that doesn't > interfere with my tiling background. But it does end up with certain > pages looking a little silly: > > http://tinyurl.com/mfyyuf Nothing "silly" about that page in my humble opinion. The page i

Re: [css-d] site check, particularly on ie6 ?

> >>> Index and all inside pages: Neither Opera or The IEs are capable of >>> scaling line-height set in pixels. Try a raw number for line-height. >> >> wow. didn't even know i could do that. the w3 site doesn't even >> mention that you can use px, but everyone and their mom seem to, >> includ

Re: [css-d] site check, particularly on ie6 ?

On 2009/05/31 18:14 (GMT-0400) snak detek+0r composed: > My basic instinct is to set the base at 10px, simply so i > can work in units that I'm used to. If everything is multiples of ten it > makes ems a much more intelligible unit too 10 does seem easy on the surface, as most of us are

Re: [css-d] site check, particularly on ie6 ?

David Laakso wrote: ... > IE/6 does not support min-height and is honoring height:500px; > The correction is to let content determine height. Compliant browsers, > and IE/7 will all go along with this; and, IE/6 will follow suit. > > #content { border: 1px solid red (4 position only--delete);

Re: [css-d] site check, particularly on ie6 ?

That's good to know. I guess it's not surprising; it is, however, rather disconcerting. My basic instinct is to set the base at 10px, simply so i can work in units that I'm used to. If everything is multiples of ten it makes ems a much more intelligible unit too. I guess I've been going about t

Re: [css-d] site check, particularly on ie6 ?

snak detek+0r wrote: > > > actually, since i got to check this on ie6 today, i did notice a huge > problem (perhaps better asked under separate cover; not sure?). the > problem can be easily seen here: > > http://tinyurl.com/nd27cr > IE/6 does not support min-height and is honoring height:5

Re: [css-d] site check, particularly on ie6 ?

snak detek+0r wrote: > yes yes, i know. but that will break my background image. that's what i > was trying to say before: the only reason i used overflow:hidden is that > it somehow made the bg work (what i'm talking about visually is that the > main/middle section of that vertical silver divid

Re: [css-d] site check, particularly on ie6 ?

yes yes, i know. but that will break my background image. that's what i was trying to say before: the only reason i used overflow:hidden is that it somehow made the bg work (what i'm talking about visually is that the main/middle section of that vertical silver divider line). i see now that thi

Re: [css-d] site check, particularly on ie6 ?

On 2009/05/30 09:45 (GMT-0700) David Hucklesby composed: > FWIW - I have set a modest minimum font size of 12px on my browsers. My > primary browser, Opera 9.6 on Mac, scales up _all_ fonts on pages that > have the seemingly popular 62.5% font-size set on BODY. It amazes me how > many pages break

Re: [css-d] site check, particularly on ie6 ?

Gunlaug Sørtun wrote: > snak detek+0r wrote: > [...] >>> Index: Minimum font-size 24px breaks the h-nav and does a little >>> number on the text in right column. >> i'm not sure what you mean by this? i don't have any fonts nearly >> that big. and i also couldn't see what you're talking about i

Re: [css-d] site check, particularly on ie6 ?

snak detek+0r wrote: >> Index and all inside pages: Neither Opera or The IEs are capable of >> scaling line-height set in pixels. Try a raw number for >> line-height. > > wow. didn't even know i could do that. the w3 site doesn't even > mention that you can use px, but everyone and their mom s

Re: [css-d] site check, particularly on ie6 ?

David, thanks for your gracious feedback. unfortunately, i'm not sure if i understand much of what you had to say (my comprehension stats are usually pretty decent too); explanation below. also, at the bottom is a newly discovered problem its the sort of thing i can't reason, but that i know th

Re: [css-d] site check, particularly on ie6 ?

snak detek+0r wrote: > Subject: [css-d] site check, particularly on ie6 ? > > there are two different layouts, front page > http://tinyurl.com/pxgydd > > and all other pages > http://tinyurl.com/msyk76 > > fingers crossed, > thanks! No amount of finger-crossi

Re: [css-d] site check, particularly on ie6 ?

snak detek+0r wrote: > there are two different layouts, front page > > http://tinyurl.com/pxgydd > > and all other pages > > http://tinyurl.com/msyk76 > > Index and all inside pages: Neither Opera or The IEs are capable of scaling line-height set in pixels. Try a raw number for line-height. I

[css-d] site check, particularly on ie6 ?

there are two different layouts, front page http://tinyurl.com/pxgydd and all other pages http://tinyurl.com/msyk76 fingers crossed, thanks! __ css-discuss [cs...@lists.css-discuss.org] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/list

Re: [css-d] Site check please

Ib Jensen wrote: > 2009/5/20 David Laakso : > >> Ib Jensen wrote: >> > > >> Dunno, but it may be IE/6 is not honoring the advanced selector for the >> missing icons-- but does it really matter? Of more importance (?), may be >> that neither of the more important content images in the ri

Re: [css-d] Site check please

2009/5/20 David Laakso : > Ib Jensen wrote: >> >> 2009/5/20 David Laakso : >>> >>> Ib Jensen wrote: > This star html hack will set the fixed width for IE/6. Leave it in the CSS > file. Or, if you prefer, put it in an IE/6 "conditional comment." It will > work either way. > * html div#side {width:9

Re: [css-d] Site check please

2009/5/20 David Laakso : > Ib Jensen wrote: >> > Dunno, but it may be IE/6 is not honoring the advanced selector for the > missing icons-- but does it really matter? Of more importance (?),  may be > that neither of the more important content images in the right column, > reside in their respectiv

Re: [css-d] Site check please

Ib Jensen wrote: > Hi > > Link: http://ikjensen.dk > > Tested locally in FF 3.0.10 - IE 6/78 (IETester 0.3.3) > > > Locally known issues: > > IE6 dont show my link-"icons" > > IE7 - 8 behave rather ok. As FF3. > > > At 190% Page- or Text-zoom?: > > IE6: Arghhh > The template _are_ not

[css-d] Site check please

Hi Link: http://ikjensen.dk Tested locally in FF 3.0.10 - IE 6/78 (IETester 0.3.3) Locally known issues: IE6 dont show my link-"icons" IE7 - 8 behave rather ok. As FF3. At 190% Page- or Text-zoom?: IE6: Arghhh The template _are_ not made for IE6! IE7: Page got a horizontal sc

Re: [css-d] site check please?

On 2009/05/17 19:30 (GMT-0700) Jody Levinson composed: > I've created this site: http://evamoon.net and it looks all right as > far as I can see in FF and current versions of IE, but when I open the > pages in DreamWeaver the left sidebar appears in the lower right and > the navbar position

[css-d] Site check please

Hi Link: http://ikjensen.dk Tested locally in FF 3.0.10 - IE 6/78 (IETester 0.3.3) Locally known issues: IE6 dont show my link-"icons" IE7 - 8 behave rather ok. As FF3. At 190% Page- or Text-zoom: IE6: Ahhh The template not made for IE6! IE7: Page got a horizontal scroll-bar,

Re: [css-d] site check please?

On 19/05/2009, at 3:57 AM, Jody Levinson wrote: > The image at the bottom is just a plain old transparent gif with a > black mask. I'm not wild about how the mask shows over a light > background, but no mask leaves jaggedy edges on the hands. It's a > tradeoff. The way around this is to save the

Re: [css-d] site check please?

On May 17, 2009, at 7:30 PM, Jody Levinson wrote: > Hi, all, > > I've created this site: http://evamoon.net and it looks all right as > far as I can see in FF and current versions of IE, but when I open the > pages in DreamWeaver the left sidebar appears in the lower right and > the navbar positio

Re: [css-d] site check please?

Hi Chris Actually, as Bill points out, "stop the presses" is correct in this sense. It refers to when a late breaking important news story would come in to a newspaper after the edition was already on the printing press. They'd stop the printing presses to update. The image at the bottom is

Re: [css-d] site check please?

wow, thank you for the screen shot. I will adjust. On May 17, 2009, at 9:06 PM, David Laakso wrote: > Jody Levinson wrote: >> Hi, all, >> >> I've created this site: http://evamoon.net and it looks all right >> as far as I can see in FF and current versions of IE, but when I >> open the page

Re: [css-d] site check please?

Chris Blake wrote: > And 'stop the presses' is wrong, 'press' is plural. Uhh, not always, and certainly not when used as Jody is using it: as part of the age old saying: "Stop the presses." This goes way back to the days of the printing press and refers literally to stopping the printing presse

Re: [css-d] site check please?

On 18/05/2009, at 12:06 PM, David Laakso wrote: > Jody Levinson wrote: >> Hi, all, >> >> I've created this site: http://evamoon.net and it looks all right as >> far as I can see in FF and current versions of IE, but when I open >> the >> pages in DreamWeaver the left sidebar appears in the l

Re: [css-d] site check please?

Jody Levinson wrote: > Hi, all, > > I've created this site: http://evamoon.net and it looks all right as > far as I can see in FF and current versions of IE, but when I open the > pages in DreamWeaver the left sidebar appears in the lower right and > the navbar position overlaps the top of th

[css-d] site check / footerstickalt problem

Hi, we are making some cosmetic tweaks to a site I designed five years ago: Eliminating some of the fixed and pseudo-fixed elements and rearranging elements on the home page. This has also permitted a change from quirks mode to standards mode rendering. There is still some use of The reworked page

[css-d] site check please?

Hi, all, I've created this site: http://evamoon.net and it looks all right as far as I can see in FF and current versions of IE, but when I open the pages in DreamWeaver the left sidebar appears in the lower right and the navbar position overlaps the top of the content area. I don't really

Re: [css-d] Site check please...

> Subject: [css-d] Site check please... > > I'm fleshing out a new site. I thought I'm doing this is as simple a > manner as possible to not induce any anomalies, but I'm having some > issues. > > What I can see off the bat... > > - In Safari, the

Re: [css-d] Site check please...

Michael Beaudoin a écrit : > I'm fleshing out a new site. I thought I'm doing this is as simple a > manner as possible to not induce any anomalies, but I'm having some > issues. > > What I can see off the bat... > > - In Safari, the logo on the right doesn't show (it does in Firefox & > IE) >

[css-d] Site check please...

I'm fleshing out a new site. I thought I'm doing this is as simple a manner as possible to not induce any anomalies, but I'm having some issues. What I can see off the bat... - In Safari, the logo on the right doesn't show (it does in Firefox & IE) - I've put the large type (our firm) at th

Re: [css-d] Site Check: Can this DIV be vertically centered in theviewport?

From: Stephen Tang >Yes, I am aware about enlarging the font. Unfortunately, the center >image is a fixed height and it didn't look good if the box became >vertically longer as the font size increased. > http://www.isadoratang.com/index.php I'm kind of surprised at that thought because I would

Re: [css-d] Site Check: Can this DIV be vertically centered in the viewport?

Stephen Tang wrote: > Will this work on a DIV with a declared height? I'll see what > happens to my site when I remove my declared height on the DIV. Check the demos (links on top of side column in my article), and, yes, it'll work literally "no matter what" - when done right. The advantage is

Re: [css-d] Site Check: Can this DIV be vertically centered in the viewport?

Georg, Thank you for the link to your website on this. Will this work on a DIV with a declared height? I'll see what happens to my site when I remove my declared height on the DIV. --Stephen On Sat, Mar 21, 2009 at 6:30 AM, Gunlaug Sørtun wrote: > David Laakso wrote: > >>> I built this site, h

Re: [css-d] Site Check: Can this DIV be vertically centered in the viewport?

Hi David, Thanks for the reference to Georg's site. Yes, I am aware about enlarging the font. Unfortunately, the center image is a fixed height and it didn't look good if the box became vertically longer as the font size increased. --Stephen On Sat, Mar 21, 2009 at 1:51 AM, David Laakso wrote:

Re: [css-d] Site Check: Can this DIV be vertically centered in the viewport?

David Laakso wrote: >> I built this site, http://www.isadoratang.com/index.php, but I've >> been trying to determine if I can center the >> vertically in the viewport. > Yes, I think it is possible with CSS (I seem to recall a method Georg > Sortun created but can't find it at the moment) or

Re: [css-d] Site Check: Can this DIV be vertically centered in the viewport?

Stephen Tang wrote: > Hello, > > I built this site, http://www.isadoratang.com/index.php, but I've been > trying to determine if I can center the vertically in > the viewport. > > Any advice on this would be helpful. > > Sincerely, > Stephen > Yes, I think it is possible with CSS (I seem to

[css-d] Site Check: Can this DIV be vertically centered in the viewport?

Hello, I built this site, http://www.isadoratang.com/index.php, but I've been trying to determine if I can center the vertically in the viewport. The inside of this div has some additional divs that are floated left or right). I'm not sure if my margin: auto on the is really centering this di

Re: [css-d] Site check: List Item menu in different browsers

scott.blanch...@sungard.com wrote: > > > The menu at the top should look like it does in this image: > > http://www.eco-tune.net/images/menu.jpg You're positioning the wrong way round for such a construction, which makes it weak for the slightest changes in browser-en

Re: [css-d] Site check: List Item menu in different browsers

: [css-d] Site check: List Item menu in different browsers > > My site is located here: http://www.eco-tune.net > <http://www.eco-tune.net/> > > > > The menu at the top should look like it does in this image: > > http://www.eco-tune.net/images/menu.jpg > > &

[css-d] Site check: List Item menu in different browsers

My site is located here: http://www.eco-tune.net The menu at the top should look like it does in this image: http://www.eco-tune.net/images/menu.jpg As you can see from the image, their should be a 1 pixel white separator between the top menu and the submenu ben

Re: [css-d] Site Check Please - Cedar Lake Inn

Peter Hyde-Smith wrote: > 11/13/2008 > > I'd appreciate a check of these four pages, > http://www.fatpawdesign.com/CedarLakeInn/CLIbanquetmenu.html, > http://www.fatpawdesign.com/CedarLakeInn/CLIbanquetpolicies.html, > http://www.fatpawdesign.com/CedarLakeInn/CLIbanquetphotogallery.html. > > > P

[css-d] Site Check Please - Cedar Lake Inn

11/13/2008 I'd appreciate a check of these four pages, http://www.fatpawdesign.com/CedarLakeInn/CLIbanquet.html, http://www.fatpawdesign.com/CedarLakeInn/CLIbanquetmenu.html, http://www.fatpawdesign.com/CedarLakeInn/CLIbanquetpolicies.html, http://www.fatpawdesign.com/CedarLakeInn/CLIbanquetph

Re: [css-d] Site Check for IE layout issues

From: "SuzT808" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >To: >Sent: Friday, November 07, 2008 2:35 PM >Subject: Re: [css-d] Site Check for IE layout issues > > >> Hello I may be sending this twice, as it doesn't appear as though it >> reached >> the l

Re: [css-d] Site Check for IE layout issues

United Kingdom) - Original Message - From: SuzT808 To: Frynge Customer Support Sent: Saturday, November 08, 2008 2:56 AM Subject: Re: [css-d] Site Check for IE layout issues On Fri, Nov 7, 2008 at 6:22 PM, Frynge Customer Support <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: In

Re: [css-d] Site Check for IE layout issues

On Sat, 08 Nov 2008 06:18:47 -1000, Alyda Gilmore wrote: >> From: Bill Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [...] >> >> As I understand it, Internet Explorer doesn't support XHTML, so even if you >> specify >> XHTML in the doctype and even if you made server-side adjustments to >> _ensure_ that >> you were

Re: [css-d] Site Check for IE layout issues

SuzT808 wrote: > > > > > www.cocomomi.com/index8.html > > > > > > > > > > > Hi, > I assume you are referring to the DOCTYPE ? Is the HTML proprietary > because of the javascript for flash ( from Adobe) ? Should this be > transitional or another HTML

Re: [css-d] Site Check for IE layout issues

Alyda Gilmore wrote: > That's not my understanding at all! I used the following for a number of > years: > "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-strict.dtd";> > and recently switched to: > "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml11/DTD/xhtml11.dtd";> > Source: > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quirks_mode > ht

Re: [css-d] Site Check for IE layout issues

> From: Bill Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: Sat, 08 Nov 2008 10:18:55 -0500 > To: SuzT808 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Cc: , David Laakso <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: [css-d] Site Check for IE layout issues > > I'm not a list pro and this may offer l

Re: [css-d] Site Check for IE layout issues

>>> hard time getting a handle on how to ensure all of my content is in the >>> right place in Internet Explorer 7 and 6. . >> You are running Proprietary HTML not XHTML strict. The resolution of this >> issue is best left to a list pro. > I assume you are referring to the DOCTYPE ? Is the HTML

Re: [css-d] Site Check for IE layout issues

On Fri, Nov 7, 2008 at 9:58 PM, David Laakso <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote: > SuzT808 wrote: > >> Hello I would appreciate a review of the following page as I am having a >> hard time getting a handle on how to ensure all of my content is in the >> right place in Internet Explorer 7 and 6. . >> >> www.

Re: [css-d] Site Check for IE layout issues

SuzT808 wrote: > Hello I would appreciate a review of the following page as I am having a > hard time getting a handle on how to ensure all of my content is in the > right place in Internet Explorer 7 and 6. . > > www.cocomomi.com/index8.html > > > Suz > > You are running Proprietary HTML not

Re: [css-d] Site Check for IE layout issues

- Advertising http://www.frynge.com 1-403-251-9486 (Calgary) 1-866-331-9684 (Toll Free - Canada and the USA) +44 (0)8717 206 505 (United Kingdom) - Original Message - From: "SuzT808" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Friday, November 07, 2008 2:35 PM Subject: Re: [css-d] Site Check for

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >