2015-01-29, 23:10, Tom Livingston wrote:
Anyone know if this:
-webkit-text-size-adjust: 100%;
is obsolete or no longer works in latest ios? My page doesn't seem to
be impacted one way or another, no matter what I set it to (auto, none
or 100%).
According to
2015-01-20, 2:55, John wrote:
I got this error while running my contact page through the validator.
The contact form works fine, but I don’t know what this error means.
Validator cites line 230, yet the style.css is called on line 13!
– –
http://pastebin.com/B9zSx0ew
2015-01-11, 9:48, Karl DeSaulniers wrote:
I would suggest a little trip to WC3.
I wonder what that means.
See here:
http://www.w3schools.com/css/css_background.asp
The w3schools site, unreliable and with rather low information/noise
ratio, intentionally wants to be confused with the Word
2015-01-11, 6:59, Crest Christopher wrote:
The background image should sit on-top of the background color,
Yes, if both are specified.
instead the background color is overriding my background image ?
background-color:#343630;/*#b7b7b7;*/
background:url(/wdp/wip/overlay_bg.png);
2015-01-02, 18:56, Tom Livingston wrote:
[...]
body class=foo
div class=main
div class=constrained/div
div class=twodiv class=constrained/div/div
div class=twodiv class=constrained/div/div
div class=twodiv class=constrained/div/div
div class=constrained/div
/div
/body
and these styles:
.foo
2014-12-18, 16:26, Gates, Jeff wrote:
Yucca, question: when you used the Firefox Web Developer Extension, did
you notice if every legend disappeared or just the very first one (Your
Shopping Cart)?
There is no other legend element on the page.
Second, I am not allowed access to either the
2014-12-17, 15:00, FARAMINEUX wrote:
My goal is to write a haiku or a poem in the center on the page, but
I do not want the text to be centered but align left in the center of
the page. How can I achieve that? Do I have to use a centered column?
The simplest approach is to put your poetry in
2014-12-17, 15:53, Barney Carroll wrote:
You can use display inline-block, left 50% (relative to offset parent)
and transform translateX( -50% ) (relative to self) to achieve this
effect with variable width: http://jsbin.com/ruwada/1/edit?css,output
Nice.
Here’s a different idea, with even
2014-12-17, 22:24, Gates, Jeff wrote:
I only want to hide one headline. Here is the code for that headline:
fieldset id=cart-contents
legend accesskey=yYour Shopping Cart/legend
/fieldset
If that is the entire element, you can hide it with
#cart-contents { visibility: hidden; }
If it
2014-12-17, 23:34, Gates, Jeff wrote:
I’ve already tried #cart-contents legend { visibility:
hidden; } and it didn’t work. Actually, that was the first thing I tried.
Where did you put that rule? Does *anything* work where you placed it?
To see the entire code go to
2014-11-28 18:23, Ken Robinson wrote:
This is not a CSS related question -- it's just HTML
There is a CSS related issue here, too.
pAn ordered list:/p
ol
li value=92Coffee/li
li value=91Tea/li
li value=84Milk/li
/ol
Will do what you want (but without leading zeros).
The CSS
2014-10-30 8:53, Артур Истомин wrote:
I am writing POS (point of sale) software. There are two buttons: Check
out and Cancel.
What is the properly tag for them: button or a? Most of the
tutorials use a and very rarely button. So what I should to choose?
This is off-topic for this list, which
2014-10-13 20:49, Артур Истомин wrote:
I don't understand, why there is a space between two div? There is no
margin, no padding (besides body's 8px paddings). Why and how to get
rid of them?
http://jsfiddle.net/s8jyxsdr/2/
You have two div elements set to have display: inline-block. An
2014-09-18 1:44, Felix Miata wrote:
One of the rem unit's important features, if not its most important, is that
size cascade is ignored.
Indeed the very point of the rem unit is to set the size of something
using Cascading Style Sheets so that the cascade is avoided. Opinions
disagree on
2014-09-17 0:11, John wrote:
If rem units are for font size and margins and padding get % values,
does it get fairly hairy knowing what % you need for your
margin/padding?
Yes. Or, rather, impossible. You would need to make a guess and go wrong
often.
I guess through the use of descendent
2014-08-04 8:28, Karl DeSaulniers wrote:
Can you use in for inches in css or is that just jQuery that does that?
Yes, in has been a unit defined in CSS from the very beginning.
Current spec:
http://www.w3.org/TR/CSS2/syndata.html#length-units
1in equals 2.54cm (exactly). This corresponds
2014-07-31 3:59, Crest Christopher wrote:
The W3C Validator is handing me this error;
It is a warning, not an error message. But HTML validation in general is
off-topic for this list, which is about practical use of CSS.
For issues related to the W3C Markup Validation Service, consider
2014-07-25 9:06, John wrote:
Is there a way to tell the browser…*any* browser: 1em = 16px and that’s that?
No.
Or is
body
{
font-size:100%;
}
—with the underlying hope and assumption that 100% is understood to mean 16px
and from there the leap that 1em equals the 16pixels — all
2014-07-25 6:50, Felix Miata wrote:
OTOH, the em unit at the document root, where it's equal to 1rem, is
also equal to the user's definition of optimal text size, as reflected
by the browser's default size setting.
The downside of the rem is lack of support in some old browsers. We need
to
2014-07-17 6:58, Crest Christopher wrote:
Your example; didn't show a difference, the font-size in FireFox
continues to be larger.
Christopher !
Jukka K. Korpela wrote:
I have a vendor prefix for a placeholder for both Chrome and FireFox,
the same values for both, except FireFox displays
2014-07-17 7:51, Philippe Wittenbergh wrote:
Le 17 juil. 2014 à 13:35, Crest Christopher crestchristop...@gmail.com a
écrit :
I'll provide the site; scroll to the bottom. Compare in Chrome and FireFox.
[Link
2014-07-15 5:21, Crest Christopher wrote:
I have a vendor prefix for a placeholder for both Chrome and FireFox,
the same values for both, except FireFox displays a font-size of 3em
larger then Chrome ?
Please share your HTML and CSS code.
I tested with just
::-webkit-input-placeholder {
2014-07-09 15:32, Nancy Johnson wrote:
I do application development and the W3C throws an error:
These issues have nothing to do with CSS, so they are off-topic in this
list. I'll send you privately an explanation of them. Generally, in
problems with HTML validation, check
2014-07-09 20:58, Crest Christopher wrote:
I've had to restyle my form and it has caused the validator to inform me
I'm not allowed to use p as a child element of a label tag ?
The information is correct, see e.g.
http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40/interact/forms.html#edef-LABEL
2014-07-09 21:30, Crest Christopher wrote:
* What you should depends on the context and purpose, like what you
are using label for, why it should contain a paragraph, and how do
you wish to style things.
I didn't understand your last paragraph ?
Well I meant to write What you
2014-06-21 7:38, Robert A. Rosenberg wrote:
At 14:01 -0500 on 06/16/2014, Richard Wendrock Forum wrote about Re:
[css-d] font-variant:small-caps;:
I used David's suggestion to solve the problem. Assuming Arial does
not have small-caps variants, I switched to font-family: Verdana,
Geneva,
2014-06-16 22:01, Richard Wendrock Forum wrote:
I used David's suggestion to solve the problem.
I don't think he made any suggestion. He wrote Not using Arial.
Assuming Arial does not have small-caps variants,
There is no reason to assume such things; it is a fact that can be checked.
I
2014-06-13 17:14, Philippe Wittenbergh wrote:
Le 13 juin 2014 à 13:57, Jukka K. Korpela jkorp...@cs.tut.fi a écrit :
t does that (well, browsers do that) even if the font contains small-caps
glyphs. This can be seen e.g. by testing the following on IE 11 (in a system
that has the Calibri
2014-06-13 2:31, Philippe Wittenbergh wrote:
Le 13 juin 2014 à 06:42, Richard Wendrock Forum fo...@thehomepagestore.com a
écrit :
It appears there is an optical illusion when using font-variant:small-caps;
The first letter of each word appears more bold than the other letters in
the word.
2014-04-19 18:03, Freelance Traveller wrote:
If I set a width on an element - or a max-width or min-width - in ems,
is it correct to assume that the actual size will be based on the font
size OF THE PARENT ELEMENT?
No, by definition, the em unit equals the font size of the element
itself,
2014-03-27 18:34, Tom Livingston wrote:
I was doing this simple test with google fonts (via @import method).
body{
font-family: $roboto;
}
.bold{
font-weight: 500;
}
I suppose you are using some special tools that convert that $roboto to
a real name. But how do you refer to the
2014-02-17 19:35, Richard Grevers wrote:
It must be remembered that the presentation layer is optional, and CSS
isn't always available. It might be due to a server error or timeout (i
experience that on maybe 1% of page loads), or, as HTML rendering
capability extends to ever-smaller devices, a
2014-02-16 21:25, John Johnson wrote:
Something I recall in a post here makes me think that for some fonts,
a font-weight of 800 is ineffectual, as that font doesn’t “recognize”
that weight, while other fonts do.
For most fonts, font-weight: 800 has the same effect as font-weight:
bold or,
2014-01-31 16:42, John Johnson wrote:
in a ul/li set of links/nav, is it possible to make all of the
border-bottoms of equal length, regardless of how long the linked
word(s) are?
[...]
So, the border-bottom would have to be as long as the longest thing,
so all would need to be that long.
2014-01-31 20:07, Tom Livingston wrote:
[...]
ul a{
display: block; /* - Add this */
[...]
Ha ha. As always, I can't see the forest for the trees. Such a simple
solution David... :-/
But to a problem different from the one asked, which was about setting
the width of underlines to
2014-01-31 22:53, Tom Livingston wrote:
[...] won't the longest link push out the width of the
lis? In which case setting display: block; on the as will cause
them to always be as wise as the widest one? And this will result in
what the OP wanted, no?
No, the li elements too have width: auto
2014-01-31 22:58, Rod Castello wrote:
It seems like this Jukka's solution actually puts the underline across
100% of the display area which can carry it past the end of the longest
line.
Pardon? That was not my solution but a solution that I commented on (as
being a solution to a different
2014-01-19 22:47, Philip Taylor wrote:
Larry Martell wrote :
In my example, in the first option, I would need 12S left justified
and by_target right justified.
Ah, more complex, and somewhat harder (perhaps impossible); in the
absence of any distinguishing markup around 12S and by_target,
2013-10-15 17:31, Tedd Sperling wrote:
On Oct 15, 2013, at 10:06 AM, The Doctor doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca wrote:
Question 1 in css how d oyou tell the table
to have a visible border?
Google is your friend.
The question is elementary, but a good one, and Google can mislead as
well as point
2013-09-19 23:06, Markus Ernst wrote:
In my new website http://www.markusernst.ch I use web fonts. Now I found
that the appearance of these fonts is good in Firefox and IE, but quite
poor in Chrome and Opera (on Windows 7).
The copy text font looks basically similar in Chrome and Firefox on
2013-08-28 21:10, Chris Rockwell wrote:
has anyone come across a JavaScript fallback (Poly?) that
will suffice until browser adoption is better?
The only polyfill for the Grid Layout Module mentioned at
https://github.com/Modernizr/Modernizr/wiki/HTML5-Cross-Browser-Polyfills
is
2013-08-26 22:18, Tom Livingston wrote:
Anyone (still) use this? Is there something better?
http://selectivizr.com/
I use it regularly as nth-of type and first/last-of-type is so handy
and I have to support back to IE7 usually.
Since Selectivzr handles such things nicely (and I think it
2013-06-28 19:34, Eric A. Meyer wrote:
In CSS terms, the user agent applies a style of 'a:link {color:
blue;}'. (Where 'blue' really means $USER_PREFERENCE but CSS doesn't
have variables. Yet. We'll stick with blue since that's the most
common $USER_PREFERENCE.)
Modern browsers apply
2013-06-27 9:15, Philippe Wittenbergh wrote:
Technically, if you wish to have such settings as a global default for your pages, setting
them on body rather than html is the way to go.
Again, Why?
Because it sets the properties directly on the highest-level element
where they might have
2013-06-27 9:52, Philippe Wittenbergh wrote:
HTML is the highest level where (some) properties will have an effect that
matter for inheritance.
The html element is the root element, so it cannot inherit anything.
Its properties may be inherited by its children.
Consider this snippet:
2013-06-27 16:01, Tom Livingston wrote:
Whenever you use the em unit or the % unit on font-size, you need to take
into consideration that it is relative to the parent font size. This has
nothing to do with inheritance. Here you *prevent* body from inheriting
font size from its parent, html.
2013-06-27 21:02, John A. Johnson wrote:
On Jun 27, 2013, at 10:54 AM, Philip Taylor p.tay...@rhul.ac.uk wrote:
As the browser is not an element in the document tree, the html
element cannot inherit any properties from it. It may well acquire
them in some other way, but this is not
2013-06-27 0:29, COM wrote:
my css all begin like what's pasted below.
A somewhat odd piece of a stylesheet, but let's fovus on this pary:
I have no idea what things ought to be inside the html selector.
The html element consists of the head element and the body
element, and head
On 21.6.2013 2:05, Angela French wrote:
Let's say you have N-number of paragraphs in an article, and you want the last
paragraph to have some different attributes as the otherp, such as a greater
margin-bottom.
Is there a way to describe that in css?
Thank you!
John
You mean like this:
2013-06-17 19:25, Tom Livingston wrote:
Given this structure:
div class=sidebar
a href= class=grey-button icon-infoInfographics/a
a href= class=grey-button icon-calcTax Credit Calculator/a
a href= class=grey-button icon-faqFrequently Asked Questions/a
/div
It's not really much of a
2013-06-07 11:13, Philippe Wittenbergh wrote:
The '#' is a perfectly valid url so any decent browser will recognise the rule
block.
That exactly is the problem with it. It passes CSS validation, but it
will not work.
Something like this:
.a { background: url(#) 20px 20px no-repeat; }
2013-06-07 11:49, Philippe Wittenbergh wrote:
Hmm, you're missing something: in both your examples the whole rule
block will be ignored (being invalid, e.a. Whereas in my example, the
other parameters (position/size/color/repeat/...) are applied and
remembered.
The examples referred to
2013-05-11 13:18, Dez Glidden wrote:
Have a look at caniuse.com. Support is currently low between browsers and
those that do support it, mainly require a browser prefix.
What's even worse, there does not seem to be any polyfill that
implements the current Flexible Box module. There's
2013-04-25 18:17, Gabriele Romanato wrote:
You wrote: font-size: 0.5rem. Is it a typo?
I’m pretty sure Philip intentionally tested both with em and with rem.
The bug manifests itself when em is used, not when rem is used,
suggesting that IE 10 indeed calculates em wrong, when there is a
2013-04-19 0:54, COM wrote:
My understanding of font-size spec is: 100% = 1 em = the size of an M and
that this is 16px high.
No, in the value of the font-size property, the em unit denotes the font
size of the parent element. The font size is the height of the font. It
is easy to see that
2013-04-15 2:41, Philippe Wittenbergh wrote:
The suggestion by Tom Livingstone to wrap the contents of the li in
a span is one option, but not necessarily easy, depending on how the
content is generated (CMS ?).
It's somewhat clumsy, and sometimes the added markup might cause
problems with
2013-04-01 21:27, Angela French wrote:
I can't get area hidefocus=true .. to work and it certainly
won't validate. Is there a way to style the outline property applied
to the area tag? I thought maybe I could make it very light gray
dotted, but that didn't have any effect in any browser.
On 30.3.2013 1:40, Angela French wrote:
Shouldn't the following work to remove the focus outline from an image map's
areas? It does not work in IE. It works in other browsers.
map area:focus, map area:active
{outline:none;
border:0;
It should work, but IE has its oddities. It has for
2013-03-16 16:29, Larry Martell wrote:
I have 2 buttons I want to be aligned. When I use vertical-align it
moves the text within the button, not the button itself. How can I get
the 2 buttons to be aligned? See http://jsfiddle.net/YkHsL/
You have an input type=file element with float: left
2013-02-28 18:26, Chip at Caliber Communications wrote:
http://shootata2-com.cccg-inc.com/AboutUs/ATABylaws,Rulebook,Forms.aspx
I would like to use a 2-column layout in this dl, but need the individual
dt/dd groups to wrap as a unit (all or nothing). I am using some column
classes, but is
2013-03-01 1:43, Rick Gordon wrote:
I believe that adding
-webkit-column-break-after: avoid;
-webkit-column-break-before: avoid;
-webkit-column-break-inside: avoid;
... will cover for Webkit browsers.
Ah, I forgot those nonstandard properties. It's difficult to find
2013-02-28 3:49, Jon Reece wrote:
On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 7:17 PM, Angela French afre...@sbctc.edu wrote:
Am I correct that this selector does NOT work in IE 7 ? IE9 in
compatibility mode isn't displaying the icon.
No, attribute selectors are supported in IE7 (CSS 2.1) -
2013-02-22 21:55, Angela French wrote:
Could someone please explain the small in the example below:
h1 small {
font-size: 24.5px;
}
I would understand h1.small, but am confused by the syntax h1 small
The selector h1 small matches any small element nested inside an
h1 element. A
2013-02-22 22:44, Angela French wrote:
What puzzles me more is 24.5px. Apart from the issue whether it is a good
ideas to size fonts in pixels, the question arises why one would use fractions
of a pixel, in 24.5px, which might get rounded to 24px or 25px (or dealt with in
some other way).
2013-01-14 22:00, Tom Livingston wrote:
Anyone have more info on this:
http://www.w3.org/TR/2013/WD-css3-cascade-20130103/#all
specifically the bit in Example 4 where it mentions setting 'all:default'
on an element.
This looks interesting but I can't find anything more about it.
It's an
2013-01-14 22:44, Tom Livingston wrote:
Any idea how this would be used? For example, the widget example
mentioned on that page:
.widget{
all: default;
color: blue;
font-weight: bold;
}
So, over riding any inheritance, then setting the isolated styles for
this widget?
That
2013-01-14 23:18, Tom Livingston wrote:
I've been
looking into rem units and noticed that the only fallback i've seen written
about is px. Can you not fallback to em? The fallback is generally going to
be for IE 9, and they can't resize things set in px, if need be, so will
em work instead?
2012-12-20 22:09, Brian M. Curran wrote:
Sorry, I don't have a link to share. I'm working off my desktop.
This makes things rather difficult to analyze.
I've written paragraphs using p/p tags. However, there is no space
between the sets of p tags. Anyone know what would cause the space
2012-12-19 21:11, Gates, Jeff wrote:
Firebug is showing that when it's resized it's still applying the regular
style for the caption
[...]
@media only screen and (max-device-width: 480px) {
The rule tests for device width, not viewport width. For the latter, you
would use max-width.
2012-12-17 9:54, Jan Erik Moström wrote:
One thing I've always wanted to do is to get the image width so I can use
it in my declaration but I've never found a CSS-only solution.
It isn't quite clear what you mean here. There's no way to get
anything in CSS in the sense of making some
2012-11-01 22:32, Mike Breiding - Morgantown WV wrote:
I cannot get this declaration to work:
p.date
{margin-bottom:-10px; margin-top: 40px}
It would in general be useful to specify what to work means, i.e. what
is the expected effect and how the rendering differs from it.
However, in this
2012-10-30 18:36, Angela French wrote:
Is there a way (excluding using images for bullets) to style the bullet
when it is a number or a letter?
Yes. The simplest solution is to wrap it inside a span element. Of
course, you cannot do that if you use ol to generate the list, but as
soon as we
2012-10-30 20:08, Philip TAYLOR wrote:
When an HTML link references an on-page fragment that is near the
bottom of the page, the browser (when the link is followed) will
display that page fragment as close to the top of the page as it
can subject to the more important constraint that the last
2012-10-22 19:50, Philip TAYLOR wrote:
SPAN class=Apparatus referentium style=content: 'Set: 1; parts:
2'
I use it because (a) it is permitted (i.e., it is in accordance with
the specification and therefore validates, yet has no effect on the
rendered output in any conforming browser),
2012-10-22 20:31, Philip TAYLOR wrote:
You are effectively using the 'style' attribute as a carrier for
application-specific data, not for making presentational suggestions.
[...]
But no better option appeared to present
itself; title was an option, but there was a distinct risk that
a
2012-10-22 20:58, Philip TAYLOR wrote:
What is somewhat odd is that when I use the validator
to confirm that it is indeed valid, and then use the CSS link-
through to validate the CSS, it (a) validates against the CSS 3
specification (why ?),
They decided the default to CSS3 a while ago. Some
2012-10-03 20:14, Markus Ernst wrote:
Trying to change the color of list markers, I came across the ::marker
pseudo element.
The CSS 2.0 specification (now virtually wiped off from the table and of
historical value only) had a section on list markers, but it was never
implemented and it was
2012-08-03 21:38, Tom Livingston wrote:
Corrected paragraph:
Instead of repeated corrections, please post a URL demonstrating your
best effort so far and a description of what you regard as undesirable.
Yucca
__
2012-08-02 12:31, Hakan Kirkan wrote:
Using !DOCTYPE HTML breaks Canvas in IE8
If it does, that would not be a CSS issue, would it?
Jukka
__
css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org]
2012-08-02 4:11, Philippe Wittenbergh wrote:
Le 2 août 2012 à 06:03, Josh Rehman a écrit :
And, actually the uppercase DOCTYPE is important as
I've run into problems with the lowercase version in some browsers.
That sounds weird. Can you clarify which browsers are affected ?
By XML rules,
2012-07-31 3:32, Josh Rehman wrote:
The screen resolution thing is a non-issue because the CSS px
is defined to be an angular measure:
The reality is different from the spec, as one can see from the
discussion of the topic in the relevant CSS3 draft:
2012-07-31 20:43, Josh Rehman wrote:
The reality is different from the spec, as one can see from the discussion of
the topic in the relevant CSS3 draft:
http://www.w3.org/TR/css3-values/#absolute-lengths
The px unit may relate to the so-called reference pixel, or it may be anchored to a
2012-07-31 21:04, Josh Rehman wrote:
Well, I honestly don't understand where you see an ambiguity. So,
you're either using physical units like cm or mm or pixels, in which
case you're using an angular measure.
No, in situations where these dimensions (all so-called absolute
length units,
2012-08-01 4:16, Georg wrote:
On 01.08.2012 00:14, Tedd Sperling wrote:
This works for me, my students, and W3C validation:
---
!doctype html
html lang=en-us
head
meta charset=utf-8
Since that only contains an HTML5 standards mode trigger (for better
than v.5.5 CSS support in
2012-08-01 4:38, John wrote:
Given this code:
table, th, td{
border:1px dotted black;
border-collapse:collapse;
}
I find that when I use colspan=x, some of the borders are solid as a result,
perhaps because they're doubled up as cells are widened by colspan.
1px dotted
2012-07-29 17:34, Mike Manley wrote:
The W3C CSS Validation Service gives me these errors. After reading the
CSS3 standards for the font short hand I can not understand why I am
getting the errors.
45 #content Value Error : font / is not a font-family value :
1em / 1.5em
2012-07-27 0:22, Jay Tanna wrote:
I am trying to achieve, in CSS and
HTML, a menu structure like the one pictured here:
http://coffeeonmars.com/testing/menu.png
[...]
In certain situation you have to use Tables
I would rather say that in many situations, a table element is the most
2012-07-10 1:20, Mark Weiss wrote:
The code below is in our Moodle site.
the h2Is this your first time here?/h2 somehow is placed on the page
automatically. I need to know how to remove it using HTML.
It is generally much better to find out and fix the reason of a problem
than to hide its
2012-04-28 20:38, David Laakso wrote:
It may be that the page dropped the float because IE6 and lower have
problems in computing/honoring the width of block elements that
contain italic text.
There are many potential formatting problems with text appearing in an
italic font (or in a slanted
2012-04-19 16:12, Paceaux wrote:
one of the major reasons you see !important in these major corporate websites
is Internet Explorer.
Internet Explorer 7 will ignore !important,
No, it does not. It has some bugs in its support, but it would be all
wrong to say that IE 7 ignores !important.
2012-04-18 20:39, Tom Livingston wrote:
Does anyone know what the browser support is for block links? Google
isn't helping - probably because of my choice in search criteria. For
example:
a href=img src=myimg.jpg alt= /pAll of this and that image
is a single link/p/a
Functionally, browser
2012-03-20 7:51, Lisa Frost wrote:
I need to lay out some information in two columns.
So for example:
caption1 A sentence or two here.
caption 2 Next sentence here and it must line up.
caption 3 Number 3 sentence here but if it wraps it needs to be
2012-03-05 13:08, Barney Carroll wrote:
FWIW I recently discovered Open Sans, which has the same nice hinting,
relative lightness, and pleasant rounded glyphs as Calibri — but you
can embed everywhere with no legal repercussions:
http://www.google.com/webfonts/specimen/Open+Sans
Thanks, it
2012-03-06 5:22, Alan Gresley wrote:
Some results that are close:
aspect line-h span-h w
Pristina 0.460 1.312 1.312 3277
KaiTi 0.461 1.142 1.001 3328
Calibri 0.464 1.222 1.222 3346
Candara 0.464 1.222 1.222 3558
Corbel 0.464 1.222 1.222 3581
Cambria 0.467 1.174 1.174 3611
Book Antiqua 0.467
2012-02-26 0:54, Stuart King wrote:
http://skingdesign.com/rc_site/pages/rec_lemony.html
I cannot figure out how to make the current page underlined and with a
darker color (#6B382B) so it stands out.
Change the markup for it to contain a suitable inline container, e.g.
instead of
pimg
2012-02-09 11:54, Markus Ernst wrote:
I encountered that rounded corners do not seem to apply to child elements:
Right.
Is this the expected behavior? I did not find anything on the behavior
of child elements in the spec:
2012-01-27 7:55, Stuart King wrote:
http://skingdesign.com/todd/pages/pairings.html
now the current page on #sidenav needs to be red. I have tried to do this -
not successful.
Add
#sidenav ul li a#current { color: red; }
You have tried a simpler selector, just #current, but such a rule
2012-01-25 2:21, Russ Peters wrote:
The problem is that when you go to our site: http://www.redcanoecu.com
then try and login to Online Banking the tagline your dreams our
passion
image doesn't pad right 12em. It's ends up next to the logo.
I can't explain that (IE generally honors
2012-01-24 8:23, Ghodmode wrote:
So, how big is an ‘em’? I set up a small experiment to tell me just that.
I don’t see the point of the blog entry or the experiment.
http://www.ghodmode.com/blog/2012/01/i-have-a-really-big-m/
The text says ‘Letters aren’t all 1em wide.’ I find that
2012-01-05 0:54, Christian Kirchhoff wrote:
A friend of mine has a Wordpress blog: http://run-united.com
He told me that after he changed something, there was a problem in the
start page: The right column containing certain widgets was suddenly
pushed down below the main column with the recent
1 - 100 of 567 matches
Mail list logo
