Thanks for the feedback, had it fixed. Turned out to be a problem with
closing a button tag. I closed it like this:
button type=submit title=Search class=searchbutton /
which completely(!) messed up the page.
Now it's closed this way button type=submit title=Search
class=searchbutton /button
On 11/09/2013 7:01 PM, Albert van der Veen wrote:
Thanks for the feedback, had it fixed. Turned out to be a problem with
closing a button tag. I closed it like this:
button type=submit title=Search class=searchbutton /
which completely(!) messed up the page.
Now it's closed this way button
David,
I really don't see how the three HTML errors would case his problem. And, you
might want to check the CSS before running a validation. He's using CSS3 that
validation does not appear to have been run under CSS3 but rather CSS2.1 making
the error irrelevant. And, even if they were the only
Albert,
I'm not seeing your problem. Have your fixed it?
On September 3, 2013 at 8:20 AM Albert van der Veen albert.lijs...@xs4all.nl
wrote:
Hi all,
I'm working on a new site and just found out it looks (and works, as you
can't even click any link) awful in IE8/9 and good in IE10. Can
Hi all,
I'm working on a new site and just found out it looks (and works, as you
can't even click any link) awful in IE8/9 and good in IE10. Can anyone
see whether IE8/9 are choking on something that IE10 has no problems
with? I can't imagine css differences between IE9 and 10 being so huge
On Tue, 03 Sep 2013 14:20:01 +0200, Albert van der Veen wrote:
| Hi all,
|
| I'm working on a new site and just found out it looks (and works, as you
| can't even click any link) awful in IE8/9 and good in IE10. Can anyone
| see whether IE8/9 are choking on something that IE10 has no problems
Can you please view this website and give me your comments?
Especially from technical point of view.
Any quirks or strange behaviour or whatever?
I hope i will get an overview of how this site works/acts on different
browsers and platforms.
http://beta.sterrenhofje.nl
Thank you, Erik Visser
Can you please view this website and give me your comments?
Especially from technical point of view.
Any quirks or strange behaviour or whatever?
I hope i will get an overview of how this site works/acts on different
browsers and platforms.
http://beta.sterrenhofje.nl
If you wish to
On Sun, May 20, 2012 at 6:00 AM, Erik Visser e...@erikvisser.net wrote:
I hope i will get an overview of how this site works/acts on different
browsers and platforms.
http://beta.sterrenhofje.nl
Thank you, Erik Visser
The pages in the site seem to perform as expected in a Windows
Noah Learner wrote:
Hi All,
I have just made http://www.wecweddings.com live. Any usability feedback is
greatly appreciated especially on mobile devices.
Many Thanks,
Noah Learner
I see no grave CSS problem in your site cross-browser in a laptop other
than the shift-left of the
Hi All,
I have just made http://www.wecweddings.com live. Any usability feedback is
greatly appreciated especially on mobile devices.
Many Thanks,
Noah Learner
LEARNER DESIGN
www.learnerdesign.com
9 Lewis Court | Nantucket, MA 02554
508.325.6626
LEAVE YOUR MARK*
in the right place? Thank-you
very much, Kind Regards, Ed
- Original Message -
From: Theresa Mesa trixiesirishe...@gmail.com
To: Norman Fournier nor...@normanfournier.com
Cc: CSS Discuss css-d@lists.css-discuss.org
Sent: Saturday, November 07, 2009 8:20 PM
Subject: Re: [css-d] Site check
- Original Message -
From: Theresa Mesa trixiesirishe...@gmail.com
To: Norman Fournier nor...@normanfournier.com
Cc: CSS Discuss css-d@lists.css-discuss.org
Sent: Saturday, November 07, 2009 8:20 PM
Subject: Re: [css-d] Site check please
Well, according to your source code
...@gmail.com
To: Norman Fournier nor...@normanfournier.com
Cc: CSS Discuss css-d@lists.css-discuss.org
Sent: Saturday, November 07, 2009 8:20 PM
Subject: Re: [css-d] Site check please
Well, according to your source code, there's supposed to be a logo
there, called LOGO.jpg. Doesn't look
Ed Goodson wrote:
http://www.copywritecolombia.com/test.html
I do have an issue on IE though at the moment, the text string: Header2 and
the text below is not showing within the confines of the grey background
image. How can I make sure that this shows in the
Well, according to your source code, there's supposed to be a logo
there, called LOGO.jpg. Doesn't look like the image is on the server.
Did you upload the images folder to the server? Is the logo in the
images folder?
Theresa
On Nov 5, 2009, at 3:01 PM, Norman Fournier wrote:
Safari
Hi all,
Please could someone kindly test this on IE- especially 6. It looks fine to me
on ff
The page is tentatively passed xhtml strict.
http://www.copywritecolombia.com/test.html
Thank-you very much, Cheers, Ed
__
css-discuss
Hi all,
Please could someone kindly test this on IE- especially 6. It looks fine to
me on ff
The page is tentatively passed xhtml strict.
http://www.copywritecolombia.com/test.html;
Seems to look the same for me in FF and IE 6 on windows.
Posted screen shot here for IE6 for you:
What kind of things are you looking for us to find?
On Nov 4, 2009, at 3:16 PM, Ed Goodson wrote:
Hi all,
Please could someone kindly test this on IE- especially 6. It looks
fine to me on ff
The page is tentatively passed xhtml strict.
http://www.copywritecolombia.com/test.html
On 2009/10/08 16:39 (GMT-0400) David McGlone composed:
On Wed, 2009-10-07 at 00:49 -0400, Felix Miata wrote:
Even in Firefox it needs some work to take it towards resolution
independence.[...]
Do you have any pointers on how I can accomplish this? I've only been
using CSS for about a year
While I agree, its ashame that many designers choose the rigid My size,
without thinking about the user, and feel its more important to make the
screen look beautiful. On the other hand, I applaud sites like Yahoo that
attempt to keep the control in the hands of the user. Perhaps the only time
Sometimes it's not the designer, it's the client. Since it's their
money, ultimately it's their decision. The designer can try to direct
them, advise them, cajole them, but the client will get what the
client wants, in the end.
On Oct 9, 2009, at 11:43 AM, JG wrote:
While I agree, its
On Wed, 2009-10-07 at 00:49 -0400, Felix Miata wrote:
On 2009/10/06 18:44 (GMT-0400) David McGlone composed:
Hi all, Can I get a site check @ http://www.premierfirst.org
I only have Firefox and Opera and IE 8. I am suspecting my images in the
top left are going to be messed up in IE6,
David McGlone wrote:
On Wed, 2009-10-07 at 00:49 -0400, Felix Miata wrote:
On 2009/10/06 18:44 (GMT-0400) David McGlone composed:
Hi all, Can I get a site check @ http://www.premierfirst.org
I only have Firefox and Opera and IE 8. I am suspecting my images in the
top left
Hi,
http://www.redrunner.co.uk/rr/
Battling with Drupal and Javascript, but it's getting there. Let me
know of any problems and if you have any fixes for them. There are a
few niggles in IE7, but nothing major as far as I can see.
Cheers, Chris
Chris Blake wrote:
Hi,
http://www.redrunner.co.uk/rr/
Battling with Drupal and Javascript, but it's getting there. Let me
know of any problems and if you have any fixes for them. There are a
few niggles in IE7, but nothing major as far as I can see.
Cheers, Chris
Let the list
Hi all, Can I get a site check @ http://www.premierfirst.org
I only have Firefox and Opera and IE 8. I am suspecting my images in the
top left are going to be messed up in IE6, but I'm pretty confident the
layout should be good across all browsers.
Blessings
David M.
Hi,
In IE6 it falls apart. Sidebar is pushed down below of contents and the
top photo disappears.
I also think that the top title lacks some contrast. The red one over
the blue grayish background.
HTH.
Roberto
David McGlone wrote:
Hi all, Can I get a site check @ http://www.premierfirst.org
David McGlone wrote:
Hi all, Can I get a site check @ http://www.premierfirst.org
I only have Firefox and Opera and IE 8. I am suspecting my images in the
top left are going to be messed up in IE6, but I'm pretty confident the
layout should be good across all browsers.
Blessings
David M.
On 2009/10/06 18:44 (GMT-0400) David McGlone composed:
Hi all, Can I get a site check @ http://www.premierfirst.org
I only have Firefox and Opera and IE 8. I am suspecting my images in the
top left are going to be messed up in IE6, but I'm pretty confident the
layout should be good across
Hi :
Thanks in advance for all those who can or will take a few moments to
see how it works in yours browsers.
I'm thinking too to redesign the whole site (well, its not a great site,
only a few dynamic pages with a CMS system, SPIP) using Tripoli
http://devkick.com/lab/tripoli/
Has someone
Lorraine Barte Nepomuceno wrote:
Hi guys,
So far, I've tested this layout in Mac Firefox Safari, and Windows Firefox
IE8. I'd love any feedback you might have- especially viewed in other
browsers and resolutions.
http://www.splashscreen.com/sample/sample.html
Thanks very much,
Lorraine
On Fri, Jul 17, 2009 at 10:18 PM, David Laakso da...@chelseacreekstudio.com
wrote:
David Laakso wrote:
Lorraine,
Getting your page functional in IE 6/7 required hacking it from here to
Havana. And it still was not right. If you need to keep your current markup,
then someone else on the
David Laakso wrote:
Lorraine Barte Nepomuceno wrote:
Hi David,
Can you reload the page? I've made some changes (I think my
calculations for layout size were wrong :-))... please let me know if
it's better now:
http://www.splashscreen.com/sample/sample.html
thanks very much
Hi guys,
So far, I've tested this layout in Mac Firefox Safari, and Windows Firefox
IE8. I'd love any feedback you might have- especially viewed in other
browsers and resolutions.
http://www.splashscreen.com/sample/sample.html
Thanks very much,
Lorraine
On Thu, Jul 16, 2009 at 2:57 PM, Lorraine Barte
Nepomucenowebmistr...@splashscreen.com wrote:
So far, I've tested this layout in Mac Firefox Safari, and Windows Firefox
IE8. I'd love any feedback you might have- especially viewed in other
browsers and resolutions.
Lorraine Barte Nepomuceno wrote:
Thanks for your reply, David- although I do admit I am confused by
some of it... what are rivers? I'd appreciate any ideas you might
have on what I've done wrong in my CSS as well... thanks again :)
Lorraine
Think of the text-block as a piece of fine
Lorraine Barte Nepomuceno wrote:
Hi David,
Can you reload the page? I've made some changes (I think my
calculations for layout size were wrong :-))... please let me know if
it's better now:
http://www.splashscreen.com/sample/sample.html
thanks very much
Lorraine
For a lot of
On Mon, Jul 6, 2009 at 10:12 AM, Ron Zismanronzis...@mac.com wrote:
i'm also having issues with a background image (a slight gradation on
the red background)
You should try to use much higher resolution for the background image
if you want to see a more smooth gradation in the background. What
http://www.beaverdamgallery.com
hey all,
i've cobbled together what i thought was an ultra simple site, but IE
has been playing havoc with my simplicity. a fellow list member has
tried to straighten me out (thanks), and i think i'm home, but ask for
a check.
i'm also having issues with a
snak detek+0r wrote:
Nothing silly about that page in my humble opinion. The page is
short because there is not much content on it. If you want it, and
other pages that may have little content, to appear deeper-- get
creative and add a generic image beneath the text of same.
sigh.
yes yes, i know. but that will break my background image. that's what i
was trying to say before: the only reason i used overflow:hidden is that
it somehow made the bg work (what i'm talking about visually is that the
main/middle section of that vertical silver divider line).
i see now that
snak detek+0r wrote:
yes yes, i know. but that will break my background image. that's what i
was trying to say before: the only reason i used overflow:hidden is that
it somehow made the bg work (what i'm talking about visually is that the
main/middle section of that vertical silver divider
snak detek+0r wrote:
trimmed
actually, since i got to check this on ie6 today, i did notice a huge
problem (perhaps better asked under separate cover; not sure?). the
problem can be easily seen here:
http://tinyurl.com/nd27cr
IE/6 does not support min-height and is honoring
That's good to know. I guess it's not surprising; it is, however, rather
disconcerting. My basic instinct is to set the base at 10px, simply so i
can work in units that I'm used to. If everything is multiples of ten it
makes ems a much more intelligible unit too. I guess I've been going
about
David Laakso wrote:
...
IE/6 does not support min-height and is honoring height:500px;
The correction is to let content determine height. Compliant browsers,
and IE/7 will all go along with this; and, IE/6 will follow suit.
#content { border: 1px solid red (4 position only--delete);
On 2009/05/31 18:14 (GMT-0400) snak detek+0r composed:
My basic instinct is to set the base at 10px, simply so i
can work in units that I'm used to. If everything is multiples of ten it
makes ems a much more intelligible unit too
10 does seem easy on the surface, as most of us are
Index and all inside pages: Neither Opera or The IEs are capable of
scaling line-height set in pixels. Try a raw number for line-height.
wow. didn't even know i could do that. the w3 site doesn't even
mention that you can use px, but everyone and their mom seem to,
including ALA, some
snak detek+0r wrote:
Oh, I understand what you're suggesting now. And yes, that doesn't
interfere with my tiling background. But it does end up with certain
pages looking a little silly:
http://tinyurl.com/mfyyuf
Nothing silly about that page in my humble opinion. The page is
short
On 2009/05/31 19:19 (GMT-0400) snak detek+0r composed:
Since I'm still trying to get my mind around this (and the w3 rules are
quite hard to parse IMO), I was just playing around with my own styles
when I noticed that the original base line-height value for this project
was set using %:
snak detek+0r wrote:
Index and all inside pages: Neither Opera or The IEs are capable of
scaling line-height set in pixels. Try a raw number for
line-height.
wow. didn't even know i could do that. the w3 site doesn't even
mention that you can use px, but everyone and their mom seem to,
Gunlaug Sørtun wrote:
snak detek+0r wrote:
[...]
Index: Minimum font-size 24px breaks the h-nav and does a little
number on the text in right column.
i'm not sure what you mean by this? i don't have any fonts nearly
that big. and i also couldn't see what you're talking about in
On 2009/05/30 09:45 (GMT-0700) David Hucklesby composed:
FWIW - I have set a modest minimum font size of 12px on my browsers. My
primary browser, Opera 9.6 on Mac, scales up _all_ fonts on pages that
have the seemingly popular 62.5% font-size set on BODY. It amazes me how
many pages break
snak detek+0r wrote:
Subject: [css-d] site check, particularly on ie6 ?
there are two different layouts, front page
http://tinyurl.com/pxgydd
and all other pages
http://tinyurl.com/msyk76
fingers crossed,
thanks!
No amount of finger-crossing will solve the 404s on both style sheet
David, thanks for your gracious feedback. unfortunately, i'm not sure if
i understand much of what you had to say (my comprehension stats are
usually pretty decent too); explanation below. also, at the bottom is a
newly discovered problem its the sort of thing i can't reason, but that
i know
there are two different layouts, front page
http://tinyurl.com/pxgydd
and all other pages
http://tinyurl.com/msyk76
fingers crossed,
thanks!
__
css-discuss [cs...@lists.css-discuss.org]
snak detek+0r wrote:
there are two different layouts, front page
http://tinyurl.com/pxgydd
and all other pages
http://tinyurl.com/msyk76
Index and all inside pages: Neither Opera or The IEs are capable of
scaling line-height set in pixels. Try a raw number for line-height.
Index:
2009/5/20 David Laakso da...@chelseacreekstudio.com:
Ib Jensen wrote:
Dunno, but it may be IE/6 is not honoring the advanced selector for the
missing icons-- but does it really matter? Of more importance (?), may be
that neither of the more important content images in the right column,
Ib Jensen wrote:
2009/5/20 David Laakso da...@chelseacreekstudio.com:
Ib Jensen wrote:
Dunno, but it may be IE/6 is not honoring the advanced selector for the
missing icons-- but does it really matter? Of more importance (?), may be
that neither of the more important content
2009/5/20 David Laakso da...@chelseacreekstudio.com:
Ib Jensen wrote:
2009/5/20 David Laakso da...@chelseacreekstudio.com:
Ib Jensen wrote:
This star html hack will set the fixed width for IE/6. Leave it in the CSS
file. Or, if you prefer, put it in an IE/6 conditional comment. It will
Hi
Link: http://ikjensen.dk
Tested locally in FF 3.0.10 - IE 6/78 (IETester 0.3.3)
Locally known issues:
IE6 dont show my link-icons
IE7 - 8 behave rather ok. As FF3.
At 190% Page- or Text-zoom?:
IE6: Arghhh
The template _are_ not made for IE6!
IE7:
Page got a horizontal
Ib Jensen wrote:
Hi
Link: http://ikjensen.dk
Tested locally in FF 3.0.10 - IE 6/78 (IETester 0.3.3)
Locally known issues:
IE6 dont show my link-icons
IE7 - 8 behave rather ok. As FF3.
At 190% Page- or Text-zoom?:
IE6: Arghhh
The template _are_ not made for IE6!
Chris Blake wrote:
And 'stop the presses' is wrong, 'press' is plural.
Uhh, not always, and certainly not when used as Jody is using it: as
part of the age old saying: Stop the presses. This goes way back to
the days of the printing press and refers literally to stopping the
printing presses
wow, thank you for the screen shot. I will adjust.
On May 17, 2009, at 9:06 PM, David Laakso wrote:
Jody Levinson wrote:
Hi, all,
I've created this site: http://evamoon.net and it looks all right
as far as I can see in FF and current versions of IE, but when I
open the pages in
Hi Chris
Actually, as Bill points out, stop the presses is correct in this
sense. It refers to when a late breaking important news story would
come in to a newspaper after the edition was already on the printing
press. They'd stop the printing presses to update.
The image at the bottom is
On May 17, 2009, at 7:30 PM, Jody Levinson wrote:
Hi, all,
I've created this site: http://evamoon.net and it looks all right as
far as I can see in FF and current versions of IE, but when I open the
pages in DreamWeaver the left sidebar appears in the lower right and
the navbar position
On 19/05/2009, at 3:57 AM, Jody Levinson wrote:
The image at the bottom is just a plain old transparent gif with a
black mask. I'm not wild about how the mask shows over a light
background, but no mask leaves jaggedy edges on the hands. It's a
tradeoff.
The way around this is to save the
Hi
Link: http://ikjensen.dk
Tested locally in FF 3.0.10 - IE 6/78 (IETester 0.3.3)
Locally known issues:
IE6 dont show my link-icons
IE7 - 8 behave rather ok. As FF3.
At 190% Page- or Text-zoom:
IE6: Ahhh
The template not made for IE6!
IE7:
Page got a horizontal scroll-bar,
On 2009/05/17 19:30 (GMT-0700) Jody Levinson composed:
I've created this site: http://evamoon.net and it looks all right as
far as I can see in FF and current versions of IE, but when I open the
pages in DreamWeaver the left sidebar appears in the lower right and
the navbar position
Hi, all,
I've created this site: http://evamoon.net and it looks all right as
far as I can see in FF and current versions of IE, but when I open the
pages in DreamWeaver the left sidebar appears in the lower right and
the navbar position overlaps the top of the content area. I don't
Hi,
we are making some cosmetic tweaks to a site I designed five years
ago: Eliminating some of the fixed and pseudo-fixed elements and
rearranging elements on the home page. This has also permitted a
change from quirks mode to standards mode rendering. There is still
some use of
The reworked
Jody Levinson wrote:
Hi, all,
I've created this site: http://evamoon.net and it looks all right as
far as I can see in FF and current versions of IE, but when I open the
pages in DreamWeaver the left sidebar appears in the lower right and
the navbar position overlaps the top of the
On 18/05/2009, at 12:06 PM, David Laakso wrote:
Jody Levinson wrote:
Hi, all,
I've created this site: http://evamoon.net and it looks all right as
far as I can see in FF and current versions of IE, but when I open
the
pages in DreamWeaver the left sidebar appears in the lower right
Michael Beaudoin a écrit :
I'm fleshing out a new site. I thought I'm doing this is as simple a
manner as possible to not induce any anomalies, but I'm having some
issues.
What I can see off the bat...
- In Safari, the logo on the right doesn't show (it does in Firefox
IE)
This
Subject: [css-d] Site check please...
I'm fleshing out a new site. I thought I'm doing this is as simple a
manner as possible to not induce any anomalies, but I'm having some
issues.
What I can see off the bat...
- In Safari, the logo on the right doesn't show (it does in Firefox
IE
I'm fleshing out a new site. I thought I'm doing this is as simple a
manner as possible to not induce any anomalies, but I'm having some
issues.
What I can see off the bat...
- In Safari, the logo on the right doesn't show (it does in Firefox
IE)
- I've put the large type (our firm) at
From: Stephen Tang clowwizarder...@gmail.com
Yes, I am aware about enlarging the font. Unfortunately, the center
image is a fixed height and it didn't look good if the box became
vertically longer as the font size increased.
http://www.isadoratang.com/index.php
I'm kind of surprised at that
David Laakso wrote:
I built this site, http://www.isadoratang.com/index.php, but I've
been trying to determine if I can center the div id=page
vertically in the viewport.
Yes, I think it is possible with CSS (I seem to recall a method Georg
Sortun created but can't find it at the moment)
Hi David,
Thanks for the reference to Georg's site.
Yes, I am aware about enlarging the font. Unfortunately, the center
image is a fixed height and it didn't look good if the box became
vertically longer as the font size increased.
--Stephen
On Sat, Mar 21, 2009 at 1:51 AM, David Laakso
Georg,
Thank you for the link to your website on this. Will this work on a
DIV with a declared height? I'll see what happens to my site when I
remove my declared height on the DIV.
--Stephen
On Sat, Mar 21, 2009 at 6:30 AM, Gunlaug Sørtun gunla...@c2i.net wrote:
David Laakso wrote:
I built
Stephen Tang wrote:
Will this work on a DIV with a declared height? I'll see what
happens to my site when I remove my declared height on the DIV.
Check the demos (links on top of side column in my article), and, yes,
it'll work literally no matter what - when done right.
The advantage is
Hello,
I built this site, http://www.isadoratang.com/index.php, but I've been
trying to determine if I can center the div id=page vertically in
the viewport. The inside of this div has some additional divs that
are floated left or right). I'm not sure if my margin: auto on the
div id=page is
Stephen Tang wrote:
Hello,
I built this site, http://www.isadoratang.com/index.php, but I've been
trying to determine if I can center the div id=page vertically in
the viewport.
Any advice on this would be helpful.
Sincerely,
Stephen
Yes, I think it is possible with CSS (I seem to
My site is located here: http://www.eco-tune.net
http://www.eco-tune.net/
The menu at the top should look like it does in this image:
http://www.eco-tune.net/images/menu.jpg
As you can see from the image, their should be a 1 pixel white separator
between the top menu and the submenu
-discuss.org
Sent: Tuesday, March 03, 2009 4:40 PM
Subject: [css-d] Site check: List Item menu in different browsers
My site is located here: http://www.eco-tune.net
http://www.eco-tune.net/
The menu at the top should look like it does in this image:
http://www.eco-tune.net/images/menu.jpg
scott.blanch...@sungard.com wrote:
http://www.eco-tune.net/
The menu at the top should look like it does in this image:
http://www.eco-tune.net/images/menu.jpg
You're positioning the wrong way round for such a construction, which
makes it weak for the slightest changes in
11/13/2008
I'd appreciate a check of these four pages,
http://www.fatpawdesign.com/CedarLakeInn/CLIbanquet.html,
http://www.fatpawdesign.com/CedarLakeInn/CLIbanquetmenu.html,
http://www.fatpawdesign.com/CedarLakeInn/CLIbanquetpolicies.html,
Peter Hyde-Smith wrote:
11/13/2008
I'd appreciate a check of these four pages,
http://www.fatpawdesign.com/CedarLakeInn/CLIbanquetmenu.html,
http://www.fatpawdesign.com/CedarLakeInn/CLIbanquetpolicies.html,
http://www.fatpawdesign.com/CedarLakeInn/CLIbanquetphotogallery.html.
Peter
hard time getting a handle on how to ensure all of my content is in the
right place in Internet Explorer 7 and 6. .
You are running Proprietary HTML not XHTML strict. The resolution of this
issue is best left to a list pro.
I assume you are referring to the DOCTYPE ? Is the HTML
From: Bill Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sat, 08 Nov 2008 10:18:55 -0500
To: SuzT808 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: css-d@lists.css-discuss.org, David Laakso [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [css-d] Site Check for IE layout issues
I'm not a list pro and this may offer little in terms of resolution
Alyda Gilmore wrote:
That's not my understanding at all! I used the following for a number of
years:
!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC -//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Strict//EN
http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-strict.dtd;
and recently switched to:
!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC -//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.1//EN
SuzT808 wrote:
www.cocomomi.com/index8.html http://www.cocomomi.com/index8.html
Hi,
I assume you are referring to the DOCTYPE ? Is the HTML proprietary
because of the javascript for flash ( from Adobe) ? Should this be
transitional or another HTML Doctype altogether ?
On Sat, 08 Nov 2008 06:18:47 -1000, Alyda Gilmore wrote:
From: Bill Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[...]
As I understand it, Internet Explorer doesn't support XHTML, so even if you
specify
XHTML in the doctype and even if you made server-side adjustments to
_ensure_ that
you were sending XHTML
)
- Original Message -
From: SuzT808
To: Frynge Customer Support
Sent: Saturday, November 08, 2008 2:56 AM
Subject: Re: [css-d] Site Check for IE layout issues
On Fri, Nov 7, 2008 at 6:22 PM, Frynge Customer Support [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
In my internet explorer 7
@lists.css-discuss.org
Sent: Friday, November 07, 2008 2:35 PM
Subject: Re: [css-d] Site Check for IE layout issues
Hello I may be sending this twice, as it doesn't appear as though it
reached
the list.
Hello I would appreciate a review of the following page as I am
having a
hard
Hello I would appreciate a review of the following page as I am having a
hard time getting a handle on how to ensure all of my content is in the
right place in Internet Explorer 7 and 6. I am trying to leave 5 out and IE
8 looks okay, I believe this is a fairly simple design and perhaps I may
have
Hello I may be sending this twice, as it doesn't appear as though it reached
the list.
Hello I would appreciate a review of the following page as I am having a
hard time getting a handle on how to ensure all of my content is in the
right place in Internet Explorer 7 and 6. I am trying to leave
- Advertising
http://www.frynge.com
1-403-251-9486 (Calgary)
1-866-331-9684 (Toll Free - Canada and the USA)
+44 (0)8717 206 505 (United Kingdom)
- Original Message -
From: SuzT808 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: css-d@lists.css-discuss.org
Sent: Friday, November 07, 2008 2:35 PM
Subject: Re: [css-d] Site
SuzT808 wrote:
Hello I would appreciate a review of the following page as I am having a
hard time getting a handle on how to ensure all of my content is in the
right place in Internet Explorer 7 and 6. .
www.cocomomi.com/index8.html
Suz
You are running Proprietary HTML not XHTML
On Fri, Nov 7, 2008 at 9:58 PM, David Laakso
[EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote:
SuzT808 wrote:
Hello I would appreciate a review of the following page as I am having a
hard time getting a handle on how to ensure all of my content is in the
right place in Internet Explorer 7 and 6. .
1 - 100 of 1438 matches
Mail list logo
