Re: OFFTOPIC: WAS: [pf...@pfinr.org: [ PFFR ] Google Employee's Anti-Diversity Manifesto Goes 'Internally Viral']

Yes, yes, YES! (I guess the NYT has to do something to try to validate their claim to have an interest in 'truth' :) This draws out boundless black holes of inimically fiendish chagrin to say so, but the JNew York Times has actually just published a clean, factual, and even relevant, article on

Re: OFFTOPIC: WAS: [pf...@pfinr.org: [ PFFR ] Google Employee's Anti-Diversity Manifesto Goes 'Internally Viral']

(The below is really rather naughty - please don't forward it around.) On Tue, Aug 08, 2017 at 02:14:46PM +1000, Zenaan Harkness wrote: > On Tue, Aug 08, 2017 at 04:08:52AM +, \0xDynamite wrote: > > >> Reality check for the vocal minority: > > >> Who are the most oppressed people in America?

Re: [pf...@pfinr.org: [ PFFR ] Google Employee's Anti-Diversity Manifesto Goes 'Internally Viral']

On Mon, 7 Aug 2017 21:18:43 -0400 Steve Kinney wrote: > > >> http://pilobilus.net/Political-Power-Spectrum.png > > Looks good. However, the term "capitalism" isn't the right > > one I think, because it's too ambiguous. More accurate terms : > > mercantilism or

Re: OFFTOPIC: WAS: [pf...@pfinr.org: [ PFFR ] Google Employee's Anti-Diversity Manifesto Goes 'Internally Viral']

On Tue, Aug 08, 2017 at 04:08:52AM +, \0xDynamite wrote: > >> I mean, big points to who actually gets the right answer > > > > Listen, goy!, you're think rocking the boat on intolerance facts is > > permitted on a *punks list?! > > Hence, I'm wondering what this thread is doing here...

OFFTOPIC: WAS: [pf...@pfinr.org: [ PFFR ] Google Employee's Anti-Diversity Manifesto Goes 'Internally Viral']

>> I mean, big points to who actually gets the right answer > > Listen, goy!, you're think rocking the boat on intolerance facts is > permitted on a *punks list?! Hence, I'm wondering what this thread is doing here... \0xd

Re: [pf...@pfinr.org: [ PFFR ] Google Employee's Anti-Diversity Manifesto Goes 'Internally Viral']

On Tue, Aug 08, 2017 at 03:24:20AM +, \0xDynamite wrote: > Reality check for the vocal minority: > > Who are the most oppressed people in America? > > Is it: blacks, hispanics, the poor, homosexuals, women? > > I mean, big points to who actually gets the right answer Listen, goy!,

Re: [pf...@pfinr.org: [ PFFR ] Google Employee's Anti-Diversity Manifesto Goes 'Internally Viral']

Reality check for the vocal minority: Who are the most oppressed people in America? Is it: blacks, hispanics, the poor, homosexuals, women? I mean, big points to who actually gets the right answer \0xd On 8/8/17, Razer wrote: > > > On 08/07/2017 07:34 PM, jim bell

Re: [pf...@pfinr.org: [ PFFR ] Google Employee's Anti-Diversity Manifesto Goes 'Internally Viral']

On 08/07/2017 07:34 PM, jim bell wrote: > > I guess you believe that those same "Robber Baron capitalists" don't > derive their power FROM government, rather than being restricted or > impeded by government. Think again. To criminals (robber barons ARE criminals), it simply doesn't matter, as

Re: [pf...@pfinr.org: [ PFFR ] Google Employee's Anti-Diversity Manifesto Goes 'Internally Viral']

From: Steve Kinney On 08/07/2017 05:33 PM, juan wrote: > On Sun, 6 Aug 2017 19:27:23 -0400 > Steve Kinney wrote: >>     I'm not following. Are you saying that most "healthy adults" are >>     libertarians? If that was the case, then indeed we would

Re: [pf...@pfinr.org: [ PFFR ] Google Employee's Anti-Diversity Manifesto Goes 'Internally Viral']

On 08/07/2017 05:33 PM, juan wrote: > On Sun, 6 Aug 2017 19:27:23 -0400 > Steve Kinney wrote: > > > The Nolan test indicates what people believe > about themselves, not the actual motives that affect their actions - > otherwise, the inevitable conversion of our society to a

Re: [pf...@pfinr.org: [ PFFR ] Google Employee's Anti-Diversity Manifesto Goes 'Internally Viral']

On Mon, Aug 07, 2017 at 06:51:47PM -0300, Juan wrote: > On Mon, 7 Aug 2017 16:21:37 +1000 > Zenaan Harkness wrote: > > > On Sun, Aug 06, 2017 at 07:38:08PM -0300, Juan wrote: > > > If you actually were anti state you'd be against the family > > > too, because the family is

Re: [pf...@pfinr.org: [ PFFR ] Google Employee's Anti-Diversity Manifesto Goes 'Internally Viral']

On Mon, Aug 7, 2017 at 3:27 PM, jim bell wrote: > The United States Congress, and > at least the very large majority of state legislatures, are based on the > "first past the post" voting system. That system while not initially > obvious, invokes an effect called

Re: [pf...@pfinr.org: [ PFFR ] Google Employee's Anti-Diversity Manifesto Goes 'Internally Viral']

From: juan On Sun, 6 Aug 2017 19:27:23 -0400 Steve Kinney wrote: >> The Nolan Chart, beloved recruiting tool of the Libertarian Party, >> works reliably as such because - along with the associated diagnostic >> instrument - it measures and graphs the

Re: [pf...@pfinr.org: [ PFFR ] Google Employee's Anti-Diversity Manifesto Goes 'Internally Viral']

On Mon, 7 Aug 2017 16:21:37 +1000 Zenaan Harkness wrote: > On Sun, Aug 06, 2017 at 07:38:08PM -0300, Juan wrote: > > If you actually were anti state you'd be against the family > > too, because the family is the source of all the authoritarian > > nonsense or 'culture'

Re: [pf...@pfinr.org: [ PFFR ] Google Employee's Anti-Diversity Manifesto Goes 'Internally Viral']

On Sun, 6 Aug 2017 19:27:23 -0400 Steve Kinney wrote: > > The Nolan Chart, beloved recruiting tool of the Libertarian Party, > works reliably as such because - along with the associated diagnostic > instrument - it measures and graphs the desire of the individual for >

Re: [pf...@pfinr.org: [ PFFR ] Google Employee's Anti-Diversity Manifesto Goes 'Internally Viral']

On Sun, Aug 06, 2017 at 07:27:23PM -0400, Steve Kinney wrote: > On 08/06/2017 12:52 PM, jim bell wrote: > > >>Leftist = rightist = centrist = financialist. > > > >>Using these obsolete terms does nothing but stultify the conversation. > > Let's try to find a more expressive and useful vocabulary

Re: [pf...@pfinr.org: [ PFFR ] Google Employee's Anti-Diversity Manifesto Goes 'Internally Viral']

On Sun, Aug 06, 2017 at 07:38:08PM -0300, Juan wrote: > If you actually were anti state you'd be against the family too, > because the family is the source of all the authoritarian > nonsense or 'culture' that makes the state possible. Of course the logic in this is logical,

Re: [pf...@pfinr.org: [ PFFR ] Google Employee's Anti-Diversity Manifesto Goes 'Internally Viral']

From: Razer On 08/06/2017 09:52 AM, jim bell wrote: >>Particularly since the Nolan Chart, combined with the World's Smallest Political Quiz, is so much more informative: >>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nolan_Chart >Was looking at the entry:

Re: [pf...@pfinr.org: [ PFFR ] Google Employee's Anti-Diversity Manifesto Goes 'Internally Viral']

On 08/06/2017 12:52 PM, jim bell wrote: >>Leftist = rightist = centrist = financialist. > >>Using these obsolete terms does nothing but stultify the conversation. > Let's try to find a more expressive and useful vocabulary for political > discussion. > > Particularly since the Nolan Chart,

Re: [pf...@pfinr.org: [ PFFR ] Google Employee's Anti-Diversity Manifesto Goes 'Internally Viral']

On Mon, 7 Aug 2017 06:26:21 +0800 "James A. Donald" wrote: > >> On 2017-08-06 17:17, juan wrote: > >>> uh oh - except for the little fact that google is the most > >>> right wing mafia on the planet, since google is nothing > >>> but an arm of your government. > > >

Re: [pf...@pfinr.org: [ PFFR ] Google Employee's Anti-Diversity Manifesto Goes 'Internally Viral']

On Mon, 7 Aug 2017 05:21:43 +0800 "James A. Donald" wrote: > > > On Sun, 6 Aug 2017 17:09:38 +0800 > > "James A. Donald" wrote: > >> At google, all opinions from the frothing at the mouth biting mad > >> genocidal left > > On 2017-08-06 17:17, juan

Re: [pf...@pfinr.org: [ PFFR ] Google Employee's Anti-Diversity Manifesto Goes 'Internally Viral']

On Sun, 6 Aug 2017 17:09:38 +0800 "James A. Donald" wrote: At google, all opinions from the frothing at the mouth biting mad genocidal left On 2017-08-06 17:17, juan wrote: uh oh - except for the little fact that google is the most right wing mafia on

Re: [pf...@pfinr.org: [ PFFR ] Google Employee's Anti-Diversity Manifesto Goes 'Internally Viral']

From: Jason McVetta On Aug 6, 2017 4:18 PM, "juan" wrote: right wingers and         lefties are closely related fucktards. >Leftist = rightist = centrist = financialist. >Using these obsolete terms does nothing but stultify the conversation. 

Re: [pf...@pfinr.org: [ PFFR ] Google Employee's Anti-Diversity Manifesto Goes 'Internally Viral']

Three founders of cypherpunks, Tim May, Eric Hughes, John Gilmore, covered the full political spectrum of extreme right to extreme left. Shared common ground of unlimited viewpoints, denied list moderation, opposed censorship of any kind. Maybe exhibited a tad of masculine aggressiveness in

Re: [pf...@pfinr.org: [ PFFR ] Google Employee's Anti-Diversity Manifesto Goes 'Internally Viral']

On Sun, Aug 06, 2017 at 05:09:38PM +0800, James A. Donald wrote: > On 2017-08-06 13:39, Zenaan Harkness wrote: > > as is pretty widely known publicly -- Google's > > internal discussion culture is extremely robust, and overall I > > consider that to be good for Google and its users. > > > At

Re: [pf...@pfinr.org: [ PFFR ] Google Employee's Anti-Diversity Manifesto Goes 'Internally Viral']

On Aug 6, 2017 4:18 PM, "juan" wrote: right wingers and lefties are closely related fucktards. Leftist = rightist = centrist = financialist. Using these obsolete terms does nothing but stultify the conversation. Let's try to find a more expressive and useful

Re: [pf...@pfinr.org: [ PFFR ] Google Employee's Anti-Diversity Manifesto Goes 'Internally Viral']

On Sun, 6 Aug 2017 17:09:38 +0800 "James A. Donald" wrote: > On 2017-08-06 13:39, Zenaan Harkness wrote: > > as is pretty widely known publicly -- Google's > > internal discussion culture is extremely robust, and overall I > > consider that to be good for Google and its

Re: [pf...@pfinr.org: [ PFFR ] Google Employee's Anti-Diversity Manifesto Goes 'Internally Viral']

On 2017-08-06 13:39, Zenaan Harkness wrote: as is pretty widely known publicly -- Google's internal discussion culture is extremely robust, and overall I consider that to be good for Google and its users. At google, all opinions from the frothing at the mouth biting mad genocidal left to the

[pf...@pfinr.org: [ PFFR ] Google Employee's Anti-Diversity Manifesto Goes 'Internally Viral']

Politically correct hogwash being spoken out about by a senior Googler: http://gizmodo.com/exclusive-heres-the-full-10-page-anti-diversity-screed-1797564320/amp?utm_medium=referral_campaign=amp_source=motherboard.vice.com-RelayMediaAMP Google likely to hunker down on