The camera sensor capture quite a flat recording of the scene and this is
later processed through a base curve to make it look closers to what we saw
with our eyes. This happens with any typical raw -> img conversion. They
way our eyes "see" and the way a sensor works are different so some mapping
This is very nice in theory and in some situations it works too. But in
many others it's just a mess.
Let's suppose I have 2000+ pictures, I rate them, tag and process them with
DT. Now I'm done and I export 300 jpeg files. Now I start digikam or
something else, import the exported files and add
Regarding the shot, you could have used a larger aperture (as large as
possible for that focal length, the smallest value you can get). You could
also try a little slower shutter speed, up to 1/30, standing VERY still or
using a tripod or a table as support, taking a few shots, like a dozen, to
be
audio2u> |
> LinkedIn <http://au.linkedin.com/pub/bruce-williams/1/318/489> | Facebook
> <http://www.facebook.com/audio2u> | Soundcloud
> <http://www.soundcloud.com/audio2u> | Quora
> <https://www.quora.com/profile/Bruce-Williams-5>
> --------
I do not know if there is a better trick but if you do not mind playing
with shell scripts you can use find + xmlstarlet to find xmp files with the
monochrome module enabled and add the corresponding tag to it.
Lorenzo
Il giorno gio 14 mar 2019 alle ore 22:32 Mark ha
scritto:
> Is there a
I think the best way today is to use neural networks:
http://richzhang.github.io/colorization/
https://lukemelas.github.io/image-colorization.html
https://www.learnopencv.com/convolutional-neural-network-based-image-colorization-using-opencv/
If you want a ready to use option try this:
Sometimes I get strange blue "shades". Going into "input color profile" and
setting gamut clipping to sRGB fixes it.
Il giorno gio 14 feb 2019 alle ore 12:29 Dusenberg ha
scritto:
> I have just been puzzling over the 'pink highlight' problem on several
> raws I recently shot (not HDR), all of
In the lighttable, if you select multiple pictures (ctrl or shift + click)
and place the mouse pointer over one of them you can use Z and the arrows
or the mouse wheel to switch between them.
In the shortcuts preferences you can assign a key to the "sticky preview"
to toggle the full screen
I'd like this too for lens correction: the lens may be always the same but
at different focal lengths.
Now I have to enable it one by one for each photo.
2018-08-01 13:31 GMT+02:00 :
> Jochen Keil (2018-Aug-01, excerpt):
> > Is there a way to tell darktable that it should analyze each image on
I doubt this is an existing functionality. If you are comfortable with
shell programming you could try this:
- Go into core options and enable: "look for updated xmp files on startup"
https://www.darktable.org/usermanual/en/core_options.html
This will make the next startup very slow and may
Just work on the jpeg. As you say, this file is never modified so there is
no quality loss depending on how many times you "edit" it, in the same
session or multiple sessions.
Converting a jpeg to a lossless format before editing will give you zero
advantages.
When you export the file to a lossy
First I would install a distro targeted at low end machines. Something that
does not use 90% of the memory just to di fancy animations. Maybe you can
already find a lightweight image viewer there.
Check the memory usage and disable *everything* you do not need (printer,
desktop background, fancy
You could try a large radius lowpass with a mask on the plate.
2017-12-28 11:09 GMT+01:00 Dietmar Künkler :
> Hi,
>
> Can you give me a hint?
> How can I make numberplates of cars unrecognizable.
> Which modules(s) do I have to use for that?
>
> Thanks in advance.
I use it with parametric masks, geometrical and/or by luminance. Or
equalizer may be an option.
2017-12-05 21:01 GMT+01:00 :
> DT 2.2.5
>
> Is there a way of setting the contrast levels according to the
> details?
>
> I don't want to add in contrast in skies or in
These may help you to see what is going on:
strace -e trace=open,getdents darktable 2>&1 | grep -C 10 xml
I can see this in the log if I add an aaa.xml in the .local/share/lensfun
folder
open("/home/aaa/.local/share/lensfun",
O_RDONLY|O_NONBLOCK|O_DIRECTORY|O_CLOEXEC) = 25
getdents(25, /* 5
2017-11-14 8:03 GMT+01:00 <junkyardspar...@yepmail.net>:
> On Mon, Nov 13, 2017, at 22:29, Lorenzo Bolzani wrote:
> > I'm quite sure that all processing is applied before downscale (this has
> > been discussed before). And sharpening is mostly lost after downscale.
>
>
I'm quite sure that all processing is applied before downscale (this has
been discussed before). And sharpening is mostly lost after downscale.
What I do is to reopen all the small exported files with DT, apply
sharpening on the first one (with different parameters than before as the
file is
I use TAB when I need more space (or Z for a quick check). I think it's
easier than turning the head back and forth between two screens anyway.
2017-11-02 18:34 GMT+01:00 Patrick Shanahan :
> * J. Paul Bissonnette [11-02-17 13:26]:
> > Not sure it can be
And if you go on the "power symbol" tab in the right pane (the first tab
from the left) and press again on the "power symbol" the list will switch
from an "active modules" list to "all modules" list. So you can see the
ordering of all modules, even the ones that you are not currently using.
Same thing here, I think it is a bug.
When you go from 191% (or something like that) to 200% using the mouse
wheel the image suddenly jumps and is no longer centered under the mouse
pointer.
Lorenzo
2017-10-02 17:03 GMT+02:00 Jean-Luc Coulon (f5ibh) <
jean.luc.cou...@gmail.com>:
> Hi,
>
> On
nvidia-smi may give some hint on the situation, for example running it as:
watch -n 1 nvidia-smi
2017-09-22 11:27 GMT+02:00 thokster :
> Am 22.09.2017 um 09:11 schrieb Remco Viëtor:
>
>> On vendredi 22 septembre 2017 07:35:32 CEST Michael Below wrote:
>>
>>> Just an idea:
These are the most impressive results I'm aware of:
https://github.com/david-gpu/srez
https://github.com/alexjc/neural-enhance
https://arxiv.org/pdf/1609.04802.pdf
but both gives the best results with specialized training (faces for
example). The one Michael proposed seems a more generic one.
No
With a 3200 and a 2560 display (long side) I use:
screen_dpi_overwrite=76
panel_width=230 (also in the GUI Options)
But I have hi-dpi enabled with Mint Mate so this may not apply to you.
Bye
Lorenzo
2017-07-04 14:21 GMT+02:00 Аl Воgnеr :
> I found
>
Al alternative is to use darktable-cli in this way:
1. export a downscaled version of the image
2. open it with darktable and sharpen it to your liking (depending on the
downscaled size)
3. close darktable and copy the xmp file as my-sharpen.xmp in a folder of
choice
4. for your next downscaled
2017-04-13 21:55 GMT+02:00 Guillermo Rozas :
> I get very good results for "medium noise" (ISO 800 in a 5D mk II) using
> two copies of the profiled denoise module:
>
I also get good results in this mode.
For high ISO shots I usually start with a little raw denoise
ommend.
>
> Thx
>
> 2017-03-28 0:26 GMT+02:00 <darkta...@911networks.com>:
>
>> On Mon, 27 Mar 2017 23:58:19 +0200
>> Lorenzo Bolzani <l.bolz...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> >I just did a quick test: one export with no style applied and another
>> &g
I just did a quick test: one export with no style applied and another
export with a custom style containing sharpening set to max settings. The
two exported files are clearly different.
So I think the best option for downscale is to create a few styles (like
640-sharpen, 1280-sharpen,
2017-03-27 11:19 GMT+02:00 Alex Delaforce <123.adelafo...@gmail.com>:
> The image problem is more than distortion. The image circle doesn't cover
> the sensor leaving black corners. If I use jpeg instead of RAW I think the
> processor stretches the image to cover the rectangle corners. Which I
Raw warnings are relative to the RAW file before any extra DT processing.
These cannot change.
Instead "classic" warnings are relative to the image with the current
processing applied, in other words are relative to the image you are going
to export (the "jpeg").
If you have "image" clippings
2017-03-04 8:00 GMT+01:00 :
> Hello,
>
> Thank you for your answers.
>
> On 2017-03-03 15:58, Chris Siebenmann wrote:
>
>> I recently purchased a Canon EOS 80D, I am a Debian (8.7) user. All this
>>> is quite new to me so it might be a newbie question rather than a
>>>
o do the job.
>
> About the reflectivity of the neutral grey : it is an other matter. Such
> grey card can be used to adjust the exposure. But as there are strong
> controversies about what should be the neutrality of a neutral grey, this
> subject is prone to leave to various trolls.
>
This video contains a few different tricks for various situations (color
reconstruction, tone curves, colorize, etc.):
http://weeklyedit.com/blownout-highlights/
2017-02-04 9:57 GMT+01:00 KOVÁCS István :
> Have you tried the base curve with exposure fusion? It works
In lighttable select "duplicate" in the top right to have multiple
"copies". Also use the history tool, again on the right side, to copy/paste
edits from one version to another.
Lorenzo
Il lun 30 gen 2017, 12:20 Michael Staats ha scritto:
Hi
Sometimes I liked to have two
I would try with a "drawn & Parametric mask" blend mode on the Monochrome
module.
On the parametric mask use hue or a/b sliders to isolate the main color
(hint: input slider). You may also set lightness and chroma for fine
tuning, but probably there is no need. Use the mask preview. It's easier
Hi,
Olympus E-M5 mk2, Pen-F, E-M1 mk2 do this with 8 shots, 1/2 pixel shifted:
http://andreas-wonisch.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/scheme_high_resolution_mode.jpg
Olympus creates a 64MP raw file. I suppose it should be similar to their
standard RAWs but you need a custom plugin to use it in
35 matches
Mail list logo