Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
Control: affects -1 + src:exim4
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu
Hello,
nmu exim4_4.97-5 . armel armhf hppa m68k . unstable . -m "Rebuild against
libspf2-dev >= 1.2.10-8.1 (64-bit time_t transition)"
The first
Processing control commands:
> affects -1 + src:exim4
Bug #1067729 [release.debian.org] nmu: exim4_4.97-5
Added indication that 1067729 affects src:exim4
--
1067729: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1067729
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 + confirmed
Bug #1067745 [release.debian.org] bookworm-pu: package
nvidia-settings/535.171.04-1~deb12u1
Added tag(s) confirmed.
--
1067745: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1067745
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
Control: tags -1 + confirmed
On Tue, 2024-03-26 at 11:09 +0100, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
> In order to upgrade src:nvidia-graphics-drivers to the 535 LTS series
> (the 525 series currently in stable is already EoL), we need to
> update
> some additional packages (some driver components can be
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 + confirmed
Bug #1067739 [release.debian.org] bookworm-pu: package
nvidia-persistenced/535.171.04-1~deb12u1
Added tag(s) confirmed.
--
1067739: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1067739
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 + confirmed
Bug #1067742 [release.debian.org] bookworm-pu: package
nvidia-xconfig/535.171.04-1~deb12u1
Added tag(s) confirmed.
--
1067742: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1067742
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
Control: tags -1 + confirmed
On Tue, 2024-03-26 at 10:40 +0100, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
> In order to upgrade src:nvidia-graphics-drivers to the 535 LTS series
> (the 525 series currently in stable is already EoL), we need to
> update
> some additional packages (some driver components can be
Control: tags -1 + confirmed
On Tue, 2024-03-26 at 10:51 +0100, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
> In order to upgrade src:nvidia-graphics-drivers to the 535 LTS series
> (the 525 series currently in stable is already EoL), we need to
> update
> some additional packages (some driver components can be
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA384
Hi,
>In the -ports world, hppa doesn't have Java anyway, while m68k, powerpc
>and sh4 seem to have had a re-bootstrap at some point; so I think it's
>only the release architectures armel and armhf that have a problem here.
I hacked that, and I
On Tue, 26 Mar 2024, Jeffrey Walton wrote:
>Nothing beats a native compile in your basement.
Yes, definitely.
>> Do they run stock Debian armhf?
>
>So the CubieTruck is embarrassingly down level:
Oofff…
>The Wandboard is doing better:
Right, close enough anyway.
>I don't mind shipping to
On Tue, Mar 26, 2024 at 6:30 PM Thorsten Glaser wrote:
>
> [...]
>
> The options for the armel/armhf porters are to either get the
> .debs from me, install them in a chroot, and then the other B-D,
> and rebuild the packages, or to use dpkg --force-depends to
> install the dependencies (which
Hi Jeffrey,
I’m answering back from the $dayjob address because Googlemail
cannot communicate with normal mailservers.
>I can send you two dev boards, if you want them. The first is
>Wandboard Dual (Cortex-A9, ARMv7 with NEON), and the second is
>CubieTruck 5 (Cortex-A7, ARMv7 with NEON and
On 2024-03-26 10:35 +, Simon McVittie wrote:
> It seems that some of the dependency chains for packages that are still
> waiting to be rebuilt on armel,armhf now end at openjdk-17, which is the
> default Java version for most architectures and Build-Depends on itself
> (with an alternative
On Wed, 27 Mar 2024, Wookey wrote:
>I looked at this last week, but got stuck because openjdk-17's
>build-deps included graphviz
Build-Depends-Indep: graphviz, pandoc
You don’t need that. Use dpkg-checkbuilddeps -B, or manual
inspection of the .dsc (packages.d.o does show the difference
between
On Tue, Mar 26, 2024 at 7:44 PM Thorsten Glaser
wrote:
>
> I’m answering back from the $dayjob address because Googlemail
> cannot communicate with normal mailservers.
>
> >I can send you two dev boards, if you want them. The first is
> >Wandboard Dual (Cortex-A9, ARMv7 with NEON), and the second
The next good target for binNMUs that wasn't done yet (AFAICS) is
https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-gpgme1.0.html
--
WBR, wRAR
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
Tags: bookworm
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu
[ Reason ]
In order to upgrade src:nvidia-graphics-drivers to the 535 LTS series
(the 525 series currently in stable is already EoL), we need to update
some additional packages
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
Tags: bookworm
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu
[ Reason ]
In order to upgrade src:nvidia-graphics-drivers to the 535 LTS series
(the 525 series currently in stable is already EoL), we need to update
some additional packages
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-Cc: popp...@packages.debian.org
Control: affects -1 + src:poppler
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu
nmu poppler_22.12.0-2.2 . riscv64 . unstable . -m "Rebuild with libqt5core5t64"
See
Processing control commands:
> affects -1 + src:poppler
Bug #1067746 [release.debian.org] nmu: poppler_22.12.0-2.2
Added indication that 1067746 affects src:poppler
--
1067746: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1067746
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
It seems that some of the dependency chains for packages that are still
waiting to be rebuilt on armel,armhf now end at openjdk-17, which is the
default Java version for most architectures and Build-Depends on itself
(with an alternative dependency on openjdk-16, but that no longer exists).
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-Cc: ffm...@packages.debian.org
Control: affects -1 + src:ffmpeg
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu
Manual (bootstrap?) builds of ffmpeg on armel, armhf seem to have been done
with libglib2.0-0, which is depended on
Processing control commands:
> affects -1 + src:ffmpeg
Bug #1067749 [release.debian.org] nmu: ffmpeg_7:6.1.1-3
Added indication that 1067749 affects src:ffmpeg
--
1067749: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1067749
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
Tags: bookworm
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu
[ Reason ]
In order to upgrade src:nvidia-graphics-drivers to the 535 LTS series
(the 525 series currently in stable is already EoL), we need to update
some additional packages
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-Cc: v...@packages.debian.org
Control: affects -1 + src:vlc
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu
nmu vlc_3.0.20-3 . riscv64 . unstable . -m "Rebuild with libqt5core5t64"
https://packages.debian.org/sid/vlc-plugin-qt
Processing control commands:
> affects -1 + src:vlc
Bug #1067748 [release.debian.org] nmu: vlc_3.0.20-3
Added indication that 1067748 affects src:vlc
--
1067748: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1067748
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Your message dated Tue, 26 Mar 2024 13:04:04 +0100
with message-id
and subject line Re: Bug#1067746: nmu: poppler_22.12.0-2.2
has caused the Debian Bug report #1067746,
regarding nmu: poppler_22.12.0-2.2
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If
Your message dated Tue, 26 Mar 2024 13:04:17 +0100
with message-id
and subject line Re: Bug#1067748: nmu: vlc_3.0.20-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #1067748,
regarding nmu: vlc_3.0.20-3
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-Cc: xmlrp...@packages.debian.org
Control: affects -1 + src:xmlrpc-c
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu
nmu xmlrpc-c_1.33.14-11 . armel armhf . unstable . -m "Rebuild for time_t"
Processing control commands:
> affects -1 + src:xmlrpc-c
Bug #1067762 [release.debian.org] nmu: xmlrpc-c_1.33.14-11
Added indication that 1067762 affects src:xmlrpc-c
--
1067762: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1067762
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
On 2024-03-26 Andreas Metzler wrote:
[...]
> nmu exim4_4.97-5 . armel armhf hppa m68k . unstable . -m "Rebuild against
> libspf2-dev >= 1.2.10-8.1 (64-bit time_t transition)"
> The first t64-changed libspf2 was uninstallable on the 32bit archs,
> which is why exim4 was not bin-nmued
Your message dated Tue, 26 Mar 2024 13:09:02 +0100
with message-id
and subject line Re: Bug#1067749: nmu: ffmpeg_7:6.1.1-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #1067749,
regarding nmu: ffmpeg_7:6.1.1-3
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is
I think binNMUs for packages involved in
https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-sphinxbase.html
would be useful. If I'm reading correctly, that would unblock ffmpeg
on armel/armhf (or at least get some way towards it), and ffmpeg is
involved in a bunch of other sub-transitions.
(I hope
Processing control commands:
> affects -1 + src:libjcat
Bug #1067769 [release.debian.org] nmu: libjcat_0.2.0-2+b1
Added indication that 1067769 affects src:libjcat
--
1067769: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1067769
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-Cc: libj...@packages.debian.org
Control: affects -1 + src:libjcat
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu
nmu libjcat_0.2.0-2 . armel armhf . unstable . -m "rebuild against
libgpgme11t64"
Possibly not very high impact,
35 matches
Mail list logo
