On Wed, 12 Jul 2023 16:57:34 +
"Andrew M.A. Cater" wrote:
...
> Something like a second hand HP tower server - say a Z440 - and 7 x 18TB
> drives
I'm just curious, since I have a Z440 and it's a workstation, not a
server, and I'm pretty sure it doesn't have 7 drive bays: did you
perhaps
On 7/12/23 06:09, Cindy Sue Causey wrote:
and then merge them into one volume?
mergerfs
On July 12, 2023 10:09:13 AM UTC, Cindy Sue Causey
wrote:
>On 7/12/23, Stanislav Vlasov wrote:
>>
>> If your hardware supports 6 hard drives (5*18T + your 2T), you can use
>> lvm for merging 5 of them to one volume, or create raid0 by mdadm.
>> Some risks with plain disk merging - if one
On 7/12/23 02:44, lina wrote:
Dear all,
My computer only has 2 TB data storage capacity,
I want to have 100 TB capacity to store/analyze data.
I am thinking of adding 5 hard drives, each is 18TB, and then merge
them into one volume? or get a file server? What is the best option
for me, and
On Wed, Jul 12, 2023 at 11:00:30AM -0400, Jeffrey Walton wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 12, 2023 at 6:07 AM jeremy ardley wrote:
> >
> > On 12/7/23 17:44, lina wrote:
> > > My computer only has 2 TB data storage capacity,
> > >
> > > I want to have 100 TB capacity to store/analyze data.
> >
> > On this
lina wrote:
> I need to extract the data for downstream analysis. after that, these
> data can be removed.
Do you need all the data present at the same time to extract it?
Obviously you won't need as much storage if you can analyse/extract it
in sections.
> On Wed, Jul 12, 2023 at 2:24 PM
On Wed, Jul 12, 2023 at 01:48:28PM +0200, lina wrote:
> Currently I do not have a plan to keep the data, once the data finished
> analyzing, I can just remove it.
>
> On Wed, Jul 12, 2023 at 12:26 PM Dan Ritter wrote:
>
> > lina wrote:
> > > Dear all,
> > >
> > > My computer only has 2 TB data
lina wrote:
> Currently I do not have a plan to keep the data, once the data finished
> analyzing, I can just remove it.
OK.
If your computer has sufficient physical space and SATA
interfaces, you can install 5 x 18TB or 5 x 20TB or however many
disks that you like, and use mdadm in linear or
On Wed, Jul 12, 2023 at 6:07 AM jeremy ardley wrote:
>
> On 12/7/23 17:44, lina wrote:
> > My computer only has 2 TB data storage capacity,
> >
> > I want to have 100 TB capacity to store/analyze data.
>
> On this scale it's almost certainly easier and cheaper to use a cloud
> provider who can
I need to extract the data for downstream analysis. after that, these data
can be removed.
On Wed, Jul 12, 2023 at 2:24 PM Jerome BENOIT
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On 12/07/2023 13:48, lina wrote:
> > Currently I do not have a plan to keep the data, once the data finished
> analyzing, I can just
Hello,
On 12/07/2023 13:48, lina wrote:
Currently I do not have a plan to keep the data, once the data finished
analyzing, I can just remove it.
Do you want a `scratch space` [1] ?
What can be also interesting to know is whether you can compress your data.
Best wishes,
Jerome
[1]
On 7/12/23 06:52, Dan Purgert wrote:
On Jul 12, 2023, gene heskett wrote:
On 7/12/23 06:01, Stanislav Vlasov wrote:
ср, 12 июл. 2023 г. в 14:45, lina :
[...]
2 (see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RAIDhttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RAID)
Unfortunately, I'm getting wikipedia's fancy 403 at that
Currently I do not have a plan to keep the data, once the data finished
analyzing, I can just remove it.
On Wed, Jul 12, 2023 at 12:26 PM Dan Ritter wrote:
> lina wrote:
> > Dear all,
> >
> > My computer only has 2 TB data storage capacity,
> >
> > I want to have 100 TB capacity to
On Jul 12, 2023, gene heskett wrote:
> On 7/12/23 06:01, Stanislav Vlasov wrote:
> > ср, 12 июл. 2023 г. в 14:45, lina :
> > [...]
> > 2 (see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RAIDhttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RAID)
> Unfortunately, I'm getting wikipedia's fancy 403 at that link?
Seems it was
On 7/12/23 06:49, gene heskett wrote:
On 7/12/23 06:01, Stanislav Vlasov wrote:
ср, 12 июл. 2023 г. в 14:45, lina :
I want to have 100 TB capacity to store/analyze data.
I am thinking of adding 5 hard drives, each is 18TB,
Some primitive calcs: 5*18T = 90T, not 100T. Maybe you need 6 hdd?
On 7/12/23 06:01, Stanislav Vlasov wrote:
ср, 12 июл. 2023 г. в 14:45, lina :
I want to have 100 TB capacity to store/analyze data.
I am thinking of adding 5 hard drives, each is 18TB,
Some primitive calcs: 5*18T = 90T, not 100T. Maybe you need 6 hdd?
and then merge them into one volume?
lina wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> My computer only has 2 TB data storage capacity,
>
> I want to have 100 TB capacity to store/analyze data.
>
> I am thinking of adding 5 hard drives, each is 18TB, and then merge them
> into one volume?
> or get a file server?
> What is the best option for me, and
On 7/12/23, Stanislav Vlasov wrote:
> ср, 12 июл. 2023 г. в 14:45, lina :
>> I want to have 100 TB capacity to store/analyze data.
>> I am thinking of adding 5 hard drives, each is 18TB,
>
> Some primitive calcs: 5*18T = 90T, not 100T. Maybe you need 6 hdd?
>
>> and then merge them into one
On 12/7/23 17:44, lina wrote:
My computer only has 2 TB data storage capacity,
I want to have 100 TB capacity to store/analyze data.
On this scale it's almost certainly easier and cheaper to use a cloud
provider who can provide a good CPU and a large attached storage.
I use AWS as a
ср, 12 июл. 2023 г. в 14:45, lina :
> I want to have 100 TB capacity to store/analyze data.
> I am thinking of adding 5 hard drives, each is 18TB,
Some primitive calcs: 5*18T = 90T, not 100T. Maybe you need 6 hdd?
> and then merge them into one volume?
If your hardware supports 6 hard drives
On Vi, 11 mar 11, 19:42:47, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
If you want to make sure you get all the GUI tools you need without
chasing them down individually after doing a text only install, simply
do a standard desktop install but then set the default runlevel to 2.
2 *is* the default runlevel in
Andrei Popescu put forth on 3/12/2011 4:10 AM:
On Vi, 11 mar 11, 19:42:47, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
If you want to make sure you get all the GUI tools you need without
chasing them down individually after doing a text only install, simply
do a standard desktop install but then set the default
On 12.3.2011 2:57, Dan wrote:
On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 7:14 PM, Dr. Ed Morbius dredmorb...@gmail.com wrote:
on 18:37 Fri 11 Mar, Dan (ganc...@gmail.com) wrote:
On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 6:09 PM, Dr. Ed Morbius
dredmorb...@gmail.comwrote:
xauth is required by xbase-clients. It'll get installed
On 2011-03-12, Jari Fredriksson ja...@iki.fi wrote:
On 12.3.2011 2:57, Dan wrote:
On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 7:14 PM, Dr. Ed Morbius dredmorb...@gmail.com=
wrote:
on 18:37 Fri 11 Mar, Dan (ganc...@gmail.com) wrote:
On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 6:09 PM, Dr. Ed Morbius dredmorb...@gmail.co=
mwrote:
Is it all about running gedit?
Although I can't imagine why you can't use vim, emacs or even nano from ssh
it's pretty possible to download a copy of the file, edit it with your
preferred editor and upload it back to the server.
Atenciosamente,
Leonardo Ruoso (CE1921JP)
. . . . . . . . . . . .
On 12.3.2011 23:50, Leonardo Ruoso wrote:
Is it all about running gedit?
Although I can't imagine why you can't use vim, emacs or even nano from
ssh it's pretty possible to download a copy of the file, edit it with
your preferred editor and upload it back to the server.
I'm not the OP,
on 21:50 Sat 12 Mar, Leonardo Ruoso (leonardo.ru...@gmail.com) wrote:
Is it all about running gedit?
Although I can't imagine why you can't use vim, emacs or even nano from ssh
it's pretty possible to download a copy of the file, edit it with your
preferred editor and upload it back to the
On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 3:41 PM, Dan ganc...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I am going to prepare a File Server with Debian in a ProLiant and I think
that I will not install the X-Server. But I would like to run remotely some
gnome X programs with ssh. Which package should I install to do this, only
On 11/03/11 22:07, shawn wilson wrote:
if you want to run x windows apps, you need the x server (i think that's
just xserver-common). and you'll want to look at these in ssh_config:
ForwardX11 no
ForwardX11Trusted yes
No you do not need the X server for running X applications remotely.
on 15:41 Fri 11 Mar, Dan (ganc...@gmail.com) wrote:
Hi,
I am going to prepare a File Server with Debian in a ProLiant and I think
that I will not install the X-Server. But I would like to run remotely some
gnome X programs with ssh. Which package should I install to do this, only
xauth or
On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 6:09 PM, Dr. Ed Morbius dredmorb...@gmail.comwrote:
on 15:41 Fri 11 Mar, Dan (ganc...@gmail.com) wrote:
Hi,
I am going to prepare a File Server with Debian in a ProLiant and I think
that I will not install the X-Server. But I would like to run remotely
some
on 18:37 Fri 11 Mar, Dan (ganc...@gmail.com) wrote:
On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 6:09 PM, Dr. Ed Morbius dredmorb...@gmail.comwrote:
on 15:41 Fri 11 Mar, Dan (ganc...@gmail.com) wrote:
Hi,
I am going to prepare a File Server with Debian in a ProLiant and I think
that I will not install
On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 7:14 PM, Dr. Ed Morbius dredmorb...@gmail.com wrote:
on 18:37 Fri 11 Mar, Dan (ganc...@gmail.com) wrote:
On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 6:09 PM, Dr. Ed Morbius dredmorb...@gmail.comwrote:
xauth is required by xbase-clients. It'll get installed with that.
Should I then install
on 19:57 Fri 11 Mar, Dan (ganc...@gmail.com) wrote:
On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 7:14 PM, Dr. Ed Morbius dredmorb...@gmail.com wrote:
on 18:37 Fri 11 Mar, Dan (ganc...@gmail.com) wrote:
On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 6:09 PM, Dr. Ed Morbius
dredmorb...@gmail.comwrote:
xauth is required by
on 16:07 Fri 11 Mar, shawn wilson (ag4ve...@gmail.com) wrote:
On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 3:41 PM, Dan ganc...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I am going to prepare a File Server with Debian in a ProLiant and I think
that I will not install the X-Server. But I would like to run remotely some
gnome X
Dan put forth on 3/11/2011 2:41 PM:
Hi,
I am going to prepare a File Server with Debian in a ProLiant and I think
that I will not install the X-Server. But I would like to run remotely some
gnome X programs with ssh. Which package should I install to do this, only
xauth or I also need
Lynn Kilroy phile...@hotmail.com wrote:
My goal is to use the linux machine as a rather expensive external
hard disk drive.
You might want to consider OpenNAS (?), or one of the SLUGs that run a
Linux distribution. But that's not Debian so maybe I shouldn't suggest
it ;-)
Chris
--
To
Lynn Kilroy wrote:
I imagine this question has been answered lots of times, but I'll be
dumb and ask it again.
I am setting up a Debian computer and hope to use it primarily as a file
server. This is for a network, and all the computers network together
through an ISDN router modem
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Lynn Kilroy wrote:
I imagine this question has been answered lots of times, but I'll be
dumb and ask it again.
I am setting up a Debian computer and hope to use it primarily as a file
server. This is for a network, and all the computers
Am 2007-12-04 12:02:44, schrieb David:
Greetings all.
I'm about to attempt configuring my first ever file server.
It's based on an old HP E200 with three equally old SATA drives.
I've done package searches on package descriptions and got a plethora of
package names that may or may not
Michelle Konzack wrote:
Am 2007-12-04 12:02:44, schrieb David:
Greetings all.
I'm about to attempt configuring my first ever file server.
It's based on an old HP E200 with three equally old SATA drives.
I've done package searches on package descriptions and got a plethora of
package names
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 06/18/2007 01:33 PM, Gustavo Tux wrote:
Muito obrigado querido colega Felipe!
De nada.
Mas... Vamos por partes...
Usar UTF-8, o Samba é UTF-8 por padrão
quanto a isto tudo bem, eu já sabia que o Samba usa o UTF-8 por padrão
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 06/18/2007 10:08 PM, Edmundo Valle Neto wrote:
Também acho que o ideal é utilizar UTF-8. Porém dependendo da versão do
Debian utilizada a console somente texto não acentua, ou seja, utilizar
UTF-8 em servidores (que obviamente não têm interface
Gustavo Tux escreveu:
aonde eu identificaria a localle?
--
_
Gerente de TI
IDT / UFRJ
Tels: 2562-2887/2833
Esta mensagem foi verificada pelo E-mail Protegido Terra
http://mail.terra.com.br/.
Scan engine:
Muito obrigado querido colega Felipe!
Mas... Vamos por partes...
Usar UTF-8, o Samba é UTF-8 por padrão
quanto a isto tudo bem, eu já sabia que o Samba usa o UTF-8 por padrão
Além disso, configurar o seus sistema de arquivos pra suportar UTF-8
Como eu faria isto? Por favor me perdoe a minha
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 06/18/2007 04:55 AM, Gustavo Tux wrote:
Boa noite pessoal!!!
Completando a mensagem que enviei anteriormente... Estou desesperado com
o quadro que me deparei aqui. Repetindo, levantei um servidor de
arquivos Samba, quando estive logado em uma
Felipe Augusto van de Wiel (faw) escreveu:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 06/18/2007 04:55 AM, Gustavo Tux wrote:
Boa noite pessoal!!!
Completando a mensagem que enviei anteriormente... Estou desesperado com
o quadro que me deparei aqui. Repetindo, levantei um servidor de
Muito obrigado Edmundo!
Eu estou usando o Debian 4.0 (Etch), não entendi quando vc fala em usar o
servidor somente console... na verdade os servers não são para rodarem em
modo texto? e isto influencia nos arquivos que armazenamos nele e são
visualizados por outras estações?
Em 18/06/07,
Gustavo Tux escreveu:
Muito obrigado Edmundo!
Eu estou usando o Debian 4.0 (Etch), não entendi quando vc fala em
usar o servidor somente console... na verdade os servers não são para
rodarem em modo texto?
Sim são. Eu não disse servidores somente console. Chame como você
quiser, tem gente
Muito obrigado por este novo esclarecimento!
Fiz as alterações que vc sugeril e copntinua a mesma coisa por exemplo tem
um diretório que se chama Vídeos mas este diretório foi criado em uma
máquina Windows e copiado para o servidor e quando visualiza no
linux(estação) fica assim:V�deos entendeu
Gustavo Tux escreveu:
Muito obrigado por este novo esclarecimento!
Fiz as alterações que vc sugeril e copntinua a mesma coisa por exemplo
tem um diretório que se chama Vídeos mas este diretório foi criado
em uma máquina Windows e copiado para o servidor e quando visualiza no
linux(estação)
aonde eu identificaria a localle?
--
_
Gerente de TI
IDT / UFRJ
Tels: 2562-2887/2833
Florian (flobee) wrote:
Interessanter Threat! Könnt ihr einem Anfänger sagen mit welchen tools
ich arbeiten muss/kann um Beschädigungen fest zu stellen oder
Datenrettung vor zu nehmen?
Nimm mal die Manpages von fsck und mkfs als Ausgangspunkt zum Nachlesen.
Öffne eine Konsole und gib dazu ein:
On Wed, Feb 23, 2005 at 10:59:23AM +0100, Helmut Wollmersdorfer wrote:
Wie ich hier aus den infos entnehmen kann kommt XFS für mich wohl auch
in frage.
Für Deine Root-Partition (= /) solltest Du ext2/ext3 verwenden. Ich
verwende dafür ext3 mit Journal und hab bisher keinerlei Probleme. Mit
* Carsten Ace Dahlmann [Wed, 23.02.2005 04:35]:
Hi!
Hi,
On Mon, 21 Feb 2005 15:58:18 +0100
Andre Gorschkow [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ich habe mir mal einige Berichte zu Reiser4 (dancing trees und solche
Späße) gelesen. Das Ganze befindet sich ja noch im Teststadium, aber
gibt es hier
On Wed, Feb 23, 2005 at 04:35:36AM +0100, Carsten Ace Dahlmann wrote:
Sag mal was dazu (eigentlich müsste mein Name in seinem Mutt jetzt
leuchten, sodass er diesen Post hier liest ;))!
Wie geht das? Ich meine, wie schafft man es, daß in der
Mailinglisten-Übersicht (und nur dort) ein bestimmter
Dirk Salva schrieb:
On Wed, Feb 23, 2005 at 04:35:36AM +0100, Carsten Ace Dahlmann wrote:
Sag mal was dazu (eigentlich müsste mein Name in seinem Mutt jetzt
leuchten, sodass er diesen Post hier liest ;))!
Aha, folgende Frage gehört also zum Thread:
Wie geht das? Ich meine, wie schafft
* Dirk Salva [Wed, 23.02.2005 16:45]:
[...]
Wie geht das? Ich meine, wie schafft man es, daß in der
Mailinglisten-Übersicht (und nur dort) ein bestimmter Name (und nur
der, nicht die ganze Zeile) andersfarbig dargestellt wird?!?
Zwar hättest du einen neuen Thread aufmachen sollen aber mir
* Dirk Salva [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Feb 23, 2005 at 04:35:36AM +0100, Carsten Ace Dahlmann wrote:
Sag mal was dazu (eigentlich müsste mein Name in seinem Mutt jetzt
leuchten, sodass er diesen Post hier liest ;))!
Wie geht das? Ich meine, wie schafft man es, daß in der
On 23.Feb 2005 - 17:10:34, Bernd Schwendele wrote:
Dirk Salva schrieb:
On Wed, Feb 23, 2005 at 04:35:36AM +0100, Carsten Ace Dahlmann wrote:
Sag mal was dazu (eigentlich müsste mein Name in seinem Mutt jetzt
leuchten, sodass er diesen Post hier liest ;))!
Aha, folgende Frage gehört also zum
Andreas Pakulat schrieb:
On 23.Feb 2005 - 17:10:34, Bernd Schwendele wrote:
Dirk Salva schrieb:
On Wed, Feb 23, 2005 at 04:35:36AM +0100, Carsten Ace Dahlmann wrote:
Sag mal was dazu (eigentlich müsste mein Name in seinem Mutt jetzt
leuchten, sodass er diesen Post hier liest ;))!
On 23.Feb 2005 - 18:41:10, Bernd Schwendele wrote:
Andreas Pakulat schrieb:
On 23.Feb 2005 - 17:10:34, Bernd Schwendele wrote:
Dirk Salva schrieb:
Was hat Deine Mail-Client-Frage mit dem SUBJECT (FILESERVER) zu tun?!?
Guck mal da, ich wars nicht. War Dirk und ja er hat nen Fehler
gemacht,
On Wed, Feb 23, 2005 at 06:19:06PM +0100, Sasa Andjelkovic wrote:
halt Kollege :). Aber sowas sollte dir Google super schnell
herbeirufen.
Kotz!
Hier mal das was ich nutze (ist echt super
simpel):
color index yellow default Carsten Ace Dahlmann
Also nichts sonderbares. Bei mir
* Dirk Salva [Wed, 23.02.2005 20:41]:
On Wed, Feb 23, 2005 at 06:19:06PM +0100, Sasa Andjelkovic wrote:
halt Kollege :). Aber sowas sollte dir Google super schnell
herbeirufen.
Kotz!
Nett, darum score angepasst ;). Aber es ist so, google damit
gefüttert und man finden sehr schöne
On Wed, Feb 23, 2005 at 09:24:41PM +0100, Sasa Andjelkovic wrote:
* Dirk Salva [Wed, 23.02.2005 20:41]:
On Wed, Feb 23, 2005 at 06:19:06PM +0100, Sasa Andjelkovic wrote:
halt Kollege :). Aber sowas sollte dir Google super schnell
herbeirufen.
Kotz!
Nett, darum score angepasst ;). Aber
* Dirk Salva [Wed, 23.02.2005 22:24]:
[...]
Nett, darum score angepasst ;). Aber es ist so, google damit
gefüttert und man finden sehr schöne Beispiele.
Dein Problem. Aber ich hasse diese pauschale Google-Gesülze, ohne
Sinn und Verstand und ohne Angabe der Suchwörter. Dazu läuft hier
Toens Bueker wrote:
Juergen Sauer [EMAIL PROTECTED] meinte:
Könnt ihr mir vielleicht einen Tip für ein geeignettes Filesystem
geben? danke schon mal im vorraus.
ext3 ?
Nicht wirklich. Auf fetten Servern hat sich das XFS von SGI IMHO am
besten geschlagen. Besonders in Punkto Datensicherheit und
Florian (flobee) schrieb:
[...]
Hallo
Interessanter Threat! Könnt ihr einem Anfänger sagen mit welchen tools
ich arbeiten muss/kann um Beschädigungen fest zu stellen oder
Datenrettung vor zu nehmen?
Ich bin unter Windows mit Festplatten craches relativ geprägt
allerdings habe ich tools womit
Am 21.02.2005 um 14:49 schrieb Saskia:
Hallo Liste,
ich Frage mich die ganze Zeit welches Filesystem für einen File Server
das
sinvollste wäre. Auf dem File Server sollen später kleine
Worddokumente
(ca. 50kb) aber auch sehr große CAD Dateien (3-4 GB)liegen.
Wie viele Benutzer werden denn auf
Joerg Stadler schrieb:
On Monday 21 February 2005 15:58, Andre Gorschkow wrote:
Michelle Konzack schrieb:
Am 2005-02-21 15:39:37, schrieb Andre Gorschkow:
Da kann ich mich nur anschließen, ich selber nutze auch XFS auf dem
Fileserver und bin bis jetzt absolut damit zufrieden, was ich über
Moin Moin Andre Gorschkow, *,
Andre Gorschkow wrote on Feb 22, 2005 at 04:34PM +0100:
Ja, eigentlich kann ich dir zustimmen. Allerdings fühle ich mich
irgendwie unwohl, wenn ich etliche GBytes dem Reiserfs überlasse. Für
mich zählt nur eine Sache, seit dem ich XFS einsetze, musste ich noch
Ingo Juergensmann wrote:
Das geht aber auch nur in eine Richtung. Andererseits: bisher hab ich
noch nie eine Partition verkleinern muessen, eigentlich immer nur
vergroessern. ;)
Dem kann ich mich voll anschlieen - besonders das klappt bei XFS
wirklich im laufendem Betrieb und in Verbindung
Bernd Schwendele wrote:
Defragemntierung: Was ist das? ;-)
Performance-Kitzel fr XFS - im Ernst, XFS liefert wirklich ein
Defragmentierungstool mit, bei Debian im Pakte xfsdump zu finden :-)
Cheers,
Jan
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On Tue, Feb 22, 2005 at 07:55:30PM +0100, Jan Kesten wrote:
*meine* Erfahrung). XFS hielt seine Filesysteme und seine Daten auch
dann noch benutzbar, als mein G3 ueber Monate hinweg wegen
Kernel-Problemen mehrmals am Tag die Panik bekommen hatte.
Ack - auch bei mir verhielt und verh??lt
Hi!
On Mon, 21 Feb 2005 15:58:18 +0100
Andre Gorschkow [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ich habe mir mal einige Berichte zu Reiser4 (dancing trees und solche
Späße) gelesen. Das Ganze befindet sich ja noch im Teststadium, aber
gibt es hier vielleicht jemaden, der es schon mal getestet hat und
Paar
Hallo,
Saskia schrieb:
Hallo Liste,
(ca. 50kb) aber auch sehr große CAD Dateien (3-4 GB)liegen. Zum Einsatz
ist das ernst gemeint mit den 3-4 GB großen CAD-Dateien?
Gruß Jörg
--
Haeufig gestellte Fragen und Antworten (FAQ):
http://www.de.debian.org/debian-user-german-FAQ/
Zum AUSTRAGEN
Am Montag, den 21.02.2005, 14:49 +0100 schrieb Saskia:
Hallo Liste,
Hallo,
ich Frage mich die ganze Zeit welches Filesystem für einen File Server das
sinvollste wäre. Auf dem File Server sollen später kleine Worddokumente
(ca. 50kb) aber auch sehr große CAD Dateien (3-4 GB)liegen. Zum
Saskia schrieb:
Hallo Liste,
ich Frage mich die ganze Zeit welches Filesystem für einen File Server das
sinvollste wäre. Auf dem File Server sollen später kleine Worddokumente
(ca. 50kb) aber auch sehr große CAD Dateien (3-4 GB)liegen. Zum Einsatz
kommt natürlich Samba auf einem Debian System.
Am Montag, 21. Februar 2005 15:34 schrieb Weinzierl Stefan:
Könnt ihr mir vielleicht einen Tip für ein geeignettes Filesystem
geben? danke schon mal im vorraus.
ext3 ?
Nicht wirklich. Auf fetten Servern hat sich das XFS von SGI IMHO am
besten geschlagen. Besonders in Punkto Datensicherheit
Florian Frank schrieb:
Am Montag, den 21.02.2005, 14:49 +0100 schrieb Saskia:
Hallo Liste,
Hallo,
ich Frage mich die ganze Zeit welches Filesystem für einen File Server das
sinvollste wäre. Auf dem File Server sollen später kleine Worddokumente
(ca. 50kb) aber auch sehr große CAD Dateien (3-4
Am 2005-02-21 15:39:37, schrieb Andre Gorschkow:
Da kann ich mich nur anschließen, ich selber nutze auch XFS auf dem
Fileserver und bin bis jetzt absolut damit zufrieden, was ich über
ReiserFS nicht sagen konnte.
Also ich bin weder von ReiserFS noch von XFS begeistert.
XFS unterstützt
Michelle Konzack schrieb:
Am 2005-02-21 15:39:37, schrieb Andre Gorschkow:
Da kann ich mich nur anschließen, ich selber nutze auch XFS auf dem
Fileserver und bin bis jetzt absolut damit zufrieden, was ich über
ReiserFS nicht sagen konnte.
Also ich bin weder von ReiserFS noch von XFS
Juergen Sauer [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Mo 21 Feb 2005 16:18:24 GMT):
Nicht wirklich. Auf fetten Servern hat sich das XFS von SGI IMHO am
besten geschlagen. Besonders in Punkto Datensicherheit und Integrität.
XFS dürfte wohl das produktionsreifeste Journaled FS für Linux sein. Ist
binärkompatibel
Juergen Sauer [EMAIL PROTECTED] meinte:
Könnt ihr mir vielleicht einen Tip für ein geeignettes Filesystem
geben? danke schon mal im vorraus.
ext3 ?
Nicht wirklich. Auf fetten Servern hat sich das XFS von SGI IMHO am
besten geschlagen. Besonders in Punkto Datensicherheit und Integrität.
Heiko Schlittermann said:
Ich hatte mal (2.6) ein Rootfilesystem, mit XFS auf LVM, das hat
reproduzierbar nicht gut funktioniert: Jede Datei, die ich kurz vor
dem Abschalten (ja, ich weiß, Abschalten ist böse) offen hatte, war
nach dem Neustart *leer*. Ich weiß, dass Journaling nur die
Am Montag, den 21.02.2005, 14:49 +0100 schrieb Saskia:
Hallo Liste,
ich Frage mich die ganze Zeit welches Filesystem für einen File Server das
sinvollste wäre. Auf dem File Server sollen später kleine Worddokumente
(ca. 50kb) aber auch sehr große CAD Dateien (3-4 GB)liegen. Zum Einsatz
On Monday 21 February 2005 15:58, Andre Gorschkow wrote:
Michelle Konzack schrieb:
Am 2005-02-21 15:39:37, schrieb Andre Gorschkow:
Da kann ich mich nur anschließen, ich selber nutze auch XFS auf dem
Fileserver und bin bis jetzt absolut damit zufrieden, was ich über
ReiserFS nicht
On Sat, 2003-03-15 at 22:09, Jack Pistachio wrote:
I'd suggest ssh, sftp, and scp, which all come in the
debian ssh package. To use these with windows, I'd suggest
putty sftp client for windows. This seems th easiest way
to do it. This, of course, requires that your friends are
users on
On Sun, Mar 16, 2003 at 05:12:09PM +, Shri Shrikumar wrote..
On Sat, 2003-03-15 at 22:09, Jack Pistachio wrote:
I'd suggest ssh, sftp, and scp, which all come in the
debian ssh package. To use these with windows, I'd suggest
putty sftp client for windows. This seems th easiest
Try the free cygwin download:
http://www..cygwin.com/
Kevin Coyner wrote:
On Sun, Mar 16, 2003 at 05:12:09PM +, Shri Shrikumar wrote..
On Sat, 2003-03-15 at 22:09, Jack Pistachio wrote:
I'd suggest ssh, sftp, and scp, which all come in the
debian ssh package. To use these with windows,
On Sun, Mar 16, 2003 at 02:59:35PM -0500, Kevin Coyner wrote:
What's a good, and hopefully open source free, program that can act as
a SSH server on a Windows box? I do most of my work in Linux/Debian,
but there's one offsite webserver I have to take care of that's Win2K.
Presently I ftp
I'd suggest ssh, sftp, and scp, which all come in the
debian ssh package. To use these with windows, I'd suggest
putty sftp client for windows. This seems th easiest way
to do it. This, of course, requires that your friends are
users on your system.
-jackp
--- ScruLoose [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* ScruLoose [EMAIL PROTECTED] [20030314 23:09 PST]:
Hi all,
I'm interested in making a few files available to friends of
mine, and in having an upload directory for them to give me stuff, too.
I'm wondering what's the best tool for this job.
* I'll only be talking about a very few
ScruLoose said:
Hi all,
I'm interested in making a few files available to friends of
mine, and in having an upload directory for them to give me stuff, too.
I'm wondering what's the best tool for this job.
The first thing that comes to mind is FTP, but I'm not sure it's the right
94 matches
Mail list logo
