r experience with upgrading Debian WSL - in the end, I
> found that temporarily removing default-jre-?? helped.
>
> That allowed me to upgrade the system and then to reinstall the JRE.
>
> I think the versions of the Java runtime environment have changed very
> significantly, hence th
-C will give you what needs configuring if anything, I think.
> >
> > I had a similar experience with upgrading Debian WSL - in the end, I
> > found that temporarily removing default-jre-?? helped.
> >
> > That allowed me to upgrade the system and then to reinstall
n I try to reinstall it, I get:
>>>
>>> rbthomas@pi:~$ sudo -i apt-get install --reinstall ca-certificates-java
>>> Reading package lists... Done
>>> Building dependency tree... Done
>>> Reading state information... Done
>>> 0 upgraded, 0 newly inst
t; >> Unfortunately when I try to reinstall it, I get:
> >>
> >> rbthomas@pi:~$ sudo -i apt-get install --reinstall ca-certificates-java
> >> Reading package lists... Done
> >> Building dependency tree... Done
> >> Reading state informa
~$ sudo -i apt-get install --reinstall ca-certificates-java
>> Reading package lists... Done
>> Building dependency tree... Done
>> Reading state information... Done
>> 0 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 1 reinstalled, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded.
>> 4 not fully installed or
whenever I try to install the latest upgrades, I get
>> errors (see attached transcript).
>>
>> Can anybody see what I've done wrong? Or what I can do to fix it?
>>
>> I'm not a java user myself, though I suspect there are java programs are
>> used by p
> upgraded from Bullseye => Bookworm.
> >>
> >> Following the upgrade whenever I try to install the latest upgrades, I get
> >> errors (see attached transcript).
> >>
> >> Can anybody see what I've done wrong? Or what I can do to fix it?
> &
transcript).
>
> Can anybody see what I've done wrong? Or what I can do to fix it?
>
> I'm not a java user myself, though I suspect there are java programs are used
> by programs that I use at the command-line level. Would it be possible to
> simply "purge" the affected
I'm not a java user myself, though I suspect there are java programs are used
by programs that I use at the command-line level. Would it be possible to
simply "purge" the affected packages?
Thanks for any help you can give me to get this machine back in operation!
Rick
transcript
Descri
Le lundi 12 juin 2023 à 2:30 PM, Francois Mescam a écrit :
> Je constate que le paquet libreoffice recommande le paquet
> libreoffice-java-common donc si lors de l'installation de libreoffice il n'a
> pas été choisi d'installer libreoffice-java-common c'est normal qu'il ne soit
>
Je constate que le paquet libreoffice recommande le paquet
libreoffice-java-common donc si lors de l'installation de libreoffice il
n'a pas été choisi d'installer libreoffice-java-common c'est normal
qu'il ne soit pas installé.
De plus libreoffice-calc ne dépend pas de libreoffice-java-common
Bonjour à toutes et tous,
Je constate cette alerte quand je lance libreoffice
Warning: failed to launch javaldx - java may not function correctly
Il manque juste libreoffice-java-common et default-jre…
Quel intérêt de ne pas l’installer automatiquement en dépendance ?
Il faut lancer
Hola. Para los que tengan problema similar (los script de Processing
3.5.5 en 3D funcionan desde el fuente con el IDE andando pero no el
ejecutable) (en Linux 64 con Debian 11 y Java: openJRE
11.0.16+8-1~deb11u1). Las soluciones propuestas en:
https://wiki.controlonline.net:1029/doku.php?id
Gracias por la atención Camaleón, y disculpas el html :) Ando con mala
racha, me suelen hostigar mis amigos por "viejo" y "arcaico defensor del
texto plano", una vez que uso html para poner una negrita me critican!!
con razón :) La mala racha incluye covid (aunque bien leve por tener 4
dosis
El 2022-08-02 a las 03:27 -0300, Daniel escribió:
Buf... quito el formato html, mi pobre Mutt sólo ve una morcilla.
(...)
> Resumiendo: la misma aplicación/script hecha en Processing (y
> ejemplos similares que usan OpenGL) funciona perfecto desde el
> fuente, con el IDE de
Hola. Novato desde el sur, encaprichado con usar Processing con
OpenJDK y Debian en vez del Java cerrado de Oracle o Windows.
Bueno, todo funciona con Processing excepto (al actualizar Debian
a 11) al intentar hacer algún script de processing que requieran
"P
El 2022-06-05 a las 12:18 -0600, estebanmo...@riseup.net escribió:
> Pues eso, que me he perdido con Java :-)
(...)
> ¿Dónde puedo descargar Java *JRE* 18 (si es que existe), no la *JDK/SE*?
>
> ¹https://jdk.java.net/18
> ²https://www.java.com/es/download/
> Hola:
>
>
El 2022-06-05 a las 14:01 -0400, Roberto C. Sánchez escribió:
> On Sun, Jun 05, 2022 at 07:54:05PM +0200, Camaleón wrote:
> > Hola,
> >
> > Pues eso, que me he perdido con Java :-)
> >
> > No es que me guste tenerlo instalado pero en España para algunas cos
Hola:Hasta donde yo entiendo Oracle dejo de desarrollar Java en su versión 8, las versiones 9 a 16 se lanzaron bajo la nueva estrategia de openjdk, que a su vez incluye el jre, la versión 17 es la primera con LTS, y la que le recomiendo instalar. También esa versión es con la que Oracle cambio de
On Sun, Jun 05, 2022 at 07:54:05PM +0200, Camaleón wrote:
> Hola,
>
> Pues eso, que me he perdido con Java :-)
>
> No es que me guste tenerlo instalado pero en España para algunas cosas
> (léase administraciones y registros electrónicos variopintos) aún lo
> requieren.
>
Hola,
Pues eso, que me he perdido con Java :-)
No es que me guste tenerlo instalado pero en España para algunas cosas
(léase administraciones y registros electrónicos variopintos) aún lo
requieren.
Bien, yo siempre he tenido (tengo) instalada la JRE, además del
complemento para el navegador
Hi,
After upgrading the openssh-server to 8.8p1 has broken a client instance of
Rundeck (3.4.4) that runs some SSH commands. Downgrading to 8.7p1 using
Debian Snapshots solved this.
Don't know if there is a «better» way to notify users about this.
Thanks!
Patrice
On Wed 07 Jul 2021 at 23:43:57 (-0400), Polyna-Maude Racicot-Summerside wrote:
> On 2021-07-07 11:34 p.m., David Wright wrote:
> > If you want to be able to set and change the default entry to boot,
> > that's straightforward to do with GRUB_DEFAULT and GRUB_SAVEDEFAULT
> > in /etc/default/grub,
On Mi, 07 iul 21, 20:11:20, Polyna-Maude Racicot-Summerside wrote:
> On 2021-07-07 5:55 p.m., Andrei POPESCU wrote:
> >
> > The default in the grub menu is typically the newest kernel installed,
> > regardless of when it was (re)installed.
> If this is true then all this talk is useless because
On Wed, Jul 07, 2021 at 11:43:57PM -0400, Polyna-Maude Racicot-Summerside wrote:
[...]
> Wasn't it more simple when using Lilo or Syslinux (Keep It Simple for
> Stupid) ?
>
> Yes I know, grub have so much more but sometime you don't need that much
> and this just make it more complicated.
Hi,
On 2021-07-07 11:34 p.m., David Wright wrote:
> On Wed 07 Jul 2021 at 20:11:20 (-0400), Polyna-Maude Racicot-Summerside wrote:
>> On 2021-07-07 5:55 p.m., Andrei POPESCU wrote:
>>> On Mi, 07 iul 21, 16:05:13, Polyna-Maude Racicot-Summerside wrote:
On 2021-07-07 2:47 p.m., Andrei POPESCU
On Wed 07 Jul 2021 at 20:11:20 (-0400), Polyna-Maude Racicot-Summerside wrote:
> On 2021-07-07 5:55 p.m., Andrei POPESCU wrote:
> > On Mi, 07 iul 21, 16:05:13, Polyna-Maude Racicot-Summerside wrote:
> >> On 2021-07-07 2:47 p.m., Andrei POPESCU wrote:
> >>> On Mi, 07 iul 21, 09:35:17, Polyna-Maude
Hi,
On 2021-07-07 5:55 p.m., Andrei POPESCU wrote:
> On Mi, 07 iul 21, 16:05:13, Polyna-Maude Racicot-Summerside wrote:
>> Hi !
>>
>> On 2021-07-07 2:47 p.m., Andrei POPESCU wrote:
>>> On Mi, 07 iul 21, 09:35:17, Polyna-Maude Racicot-Summerside wrote:
Yes you can downgrand
apt-get
On Wed 07 Jul 2021 at 16:05:13 (-0400), Polyna-Maude Racicot-Summerside wrote:
> On 2021-07-07 2:47 p.m., Andrei POPESCU wrote:
> > On Mi, 07 iul 21, 09:35:17, Polyna-Maude Racicot-Summerside wrote:
> >>
> >> Yes you can downgrand
> >> apt-get downlaod linux-image-4.19.0-16-amd64
> >> dpkg -i
On Mi, 07 iul 21, 16:05:13, Polyna-Maude Racicot-Summerside wrote:
> Hi !
>
> On 2021-07-07 2:47 p.m., Andrei POPESCU wrote:
> > On Mi, 07 iul 21, 09:35:17, Polyna-Maude Racicot-Summerside wrote:
> >>
> >> Yes you can downgrand
> >> apt-get downlaod linux-image-4.19.0-16-amd64
> >> dpkg -i
Hi !
On 2021-07-07 2:47 p.m., Andrei POPESCU wrote:
> On Mi, 07 iul 21, 09:35:17, Polyna-Maude Racicot-Summerside wrote:
>>
>> Yes you can downgrand
>> apt-get downlaod linux-image-4.19.0-16-amd64
>> dpkg -i linux-image-4.19.0.16-amd64.deb
>
> Why so complicated?
>
> If APT can download the
On Mi, 07 iul 21, 09:35:17, Polyna-Maude Racicot-Summerside wrote:
>
> Yes you can downgrand
> apt-get downlaod linux-image-4.19.0-16-amd64
> dpkg -i linux-image-4.19.0.16-amd64.deb
Why so complicated?
If APT can download the package it can also install it (by calling dpkg
itself, of course).
On Wed 07 Jul 2021 at 09:35:17 (-0400), Polyna-Maude Racicot-Summerside wrote:
> On 2021-07-07 7:59 a.m., Dan Ritter wrote:
> > w f wrote:
> >> I locally host and maintain some Minecraft (Java) servers for my kids and
> >> their friends. This morning, I kicked every
Hi,
On 2021-07-07 7:59 a.m., Dan Ritter wrote:
> w f wrote:
>> I locally host and maintain some Minecraft (Java) servers for my kids and
>> their friends. This morning, I kicked everyone off the servers while I did
>> some routine maintenance. I finished with a standard su
w f wrote:
> I locally host and maintain some Minecraft (Java) servers for my kids and
> their friends. This morning, I kicked everyone off the servers while I did
> some routine maintenance. I finished with a standard sudo apt update && sudo
> apt full-upgrade
> A
On Sat, Jan 02, 2021 at 11:44:12AM +0100, Albretch Mueller wrote:
> I could not find the zim-tools utility on the debian repository:
> https://packages.debian.org/search?keywords=zim-tools
> https://packages.debian.org/search?keywords=zim
> and I can't use git since I do not connect my work
I could not find the zim-tools utility on the debian repository:
https://packages.debian.org/search?keywords=zim-tools
https://packages.debian.org/search?keywords=zim
and I can't use git since I do not connect my work computer to the Internet.
Is there a debian package or tar ball somewhere
Paul van der Vlis writes:
>> Het werkt met:
>> JAVA_HOME=/usr/lib/jvm/java-1.8.0-openjdk-amd64 scala -J-showversion
>> CheckH2.scala
>
> Begrijp ik het goed dat je een oplossing hebt?
Yep, door JAVA_HOME te zetten wordt door scala java 8 gebruikt. En
door het op d
Op 22-05-2020 om 23:19 schreef Cecil Westerhof:
> Paul van der Vlis writes:
>
>> Op 22-05-2020 om 17:19 schreef Cecil Westerhof:
>>> Paul van der Vlis writes:
>>>
>>>> Op 22-05-2020 om 12:21 schreef Cecil Westerhof:
>>>>> Ik heb een sc
Luuk writes:
> On 22-5-2020 17:33, Cecil Westerhof wrote:
>> Geert Stappers writes:
>>
>>> On Fri, May 22, 2020 at 12:21:49PM +0200, Cecil Westerhof wrote:
>>>> Ik heb een scala programma dat om voor mij onverklaarbare redenen java
>>>> 8 nodig h
Paul van der Vlis writes:
> Op 22-05-2020 om 17:19 schreef Cecil Westerhof:
>> Paul van der Vlis writes:
>>
>>> Op 22-05-2020 om 12:21 schreef Cecil Westerhof:
>>>> Ik heb een scala programma dat om voor mij onverklaarbare redenen java
>>>> 8
On 22-5-2020 17:33, Cecil Westerhof wrote:
Geert Stappers writes:
On Fri, May 22, 2020 at 12:21:49PM +0200, Cecil Westerhof wrote:
Ik heb een scala programma dat om voor mij onverklaarbare redenen java
8 nodig heeft. Ik gebruik als default java java 11. Is er een
mogelijkheid om te zorgen
On Fri, May 22, 2020 at 05:44:13PM +0200, Paul van der Vlis wrote:
> Op 22-05-2020 om 12:21 schreef Cecil Westerhof:
> > Ik heb een scala programma dat om voor mij onverklaarbare redenen java
> > 8 nodig heeft. Ik gebruik als default java java 11. Is er een
> > mogelijkheid om
Op 22-05-2020 om 12:21 schreef Cecil Westerhof:
> Ik heb een scala programma dat om voor mij onverklaarbare redenen java
> 8 nodig heeft. Ik gebruik als default java java 11. Is er een
> mogelijkheid om te zorgen dat alleen voor het huidige commando java 8
> de default is?
Misschien d
Geert Stappers writes:
> On Fri, May 22, 2020 at 12:21:49PM +0200, Cecil Westerhof wrote:
>> Ik heb een scala programma dat om voor mij onverklaarbare redenen java
>> 8 nodig heeft. Ik gebruik als default java java 11. Is er een
>> mogelijkheid om te zorgen dat alleen voor
Op 22-05-2020 om 17:19 schreef Cecil Westerhof:
> Paul van der Vlis writes:
>
>> Op 22-05-2020 om 12:21 schreef Cecil Westerhof:
>>> Ik heb een scala programma dat om voor mij onverklaarbare redenen java
>>> 8 nodig heeft. Ik gebruik als default java java 11. Is
Paul van der Vlis writes:
> Op 22-05-2020 om 12:21 schreef Cecil Westerhof:
>> Ik heb een scala programma dat om voor mij onverklaarbare redenen java
>> 8 nodig heeft. Ik gebruik als default java java 11. Is er een
>> mogelijkheid om te zorgen dat alleen voor het huidige
Op 22-05-2020 om 12:21 schreef Cecil Westerhof:
> Ik heb een scala programma dat om voor mij onverklaarbare redenen java
> 8 nodig heeft. Ik gebruik als default java java 11. Is er een
> mogelijkheid om te zorgen dat alleen voor het huidige commando java 8
> de default is?
Volgens
On Fri, May 22, 2020 at 12:21:49PM +0200, Cecil Westerhof wrote:
> Ik heb een scala programma dat om voor mij onverklaarbare redenen java
> 8 nodig heeft. Ik gebruik als default java java 11. Is er een
> mogelijkheid om te zorgen dat alleen voor het huidige commando java 8
> de defa
Ik heb een scala programma dat om voor mij onverklaarbare redenen java
8 nodig heeft. Ik gebruik als default java java 11. Is er een
mogelijkheid om te zorgen dat alleen voor het huidige commando java 8
de default is?
--
Cecil Westerhof
Senior Software Engineer
LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com
On Thu, 23 Apr, 2020 at 11:53:14 +0200, Sven Hartge wrote:
> Liam O'Toole wrote:
> > On Thu, 23 Apr, 2020 at 11:08:27 +0200, Sven Hartge wrote:
>
> >> Backports must not be used to fix bugs in Stable. If groovy from
> >> Stable does not work with the openjdk-11 from Stable, then this is a
> >>
Liam O'Toole wrote:
> On Thu, 23 Apr, 2020 at 11:08:27 +0200, Sven Hartge wrote:
>> Backports must not be used to fix bugs in Stable. If groovy from
>> Stable does not work with the openjdk-11 from Stable, then this is a
>> bug in Stable and has to be fixed in Stable.
> This is indeed a bug in
On Thu, 23 Apr, 2020 at 11:08:27 +0200, Sven Hartge wrote:
> Liam O'Toole wrote:
> > On Wed, 22 Apr, 2020 at 22:15:09 +0530, Jayant Tripathi wrote:
>
> >>[1]https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=929460
> >>Is there a way to download patched groovy version in debian buster
>
Liam O'Toole wrote:
> On Wed, 22 Apr, 2020 at 22:15:09 +0530, Jayant Tripathi wrote:
>>[1]https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=929460
>>Is there a way to download patched groovy version in debian buster
>>through apt?
>>As default groovy version in Buster stable is:
On Wed, 22 Apr, 2020 at 22:15:09 +0530, Jayant Tripathi wrote:
>[1]https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=929460
>Is there a way to download patched groovy version in debian buster
>through apt?
>As default groovy version in Buster stable is: Groovy Version: 2.4.16
>
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=929460
Is there a way to download patched groovy version in debian buster through
apt?
As default groovy version in Buster stable is: Groovy Version: 2.4.16 JVM:
11.0.6 Vendor: Debian OS: Linux
Regards
Jayant Tripathi
Apr 21, 2020, 04:32 by loca...@tutanota.com:
> Netbeans 10 probably requires JDK 10 to run.
>
Actually, I just checked and Netbeans 10 should run fine on JDK 11. As per
your original message you have two JDKs installed: JDK 11 and JDK 15. Make sure
you are using JDK 11 to run Netbeans, if
Apr 20, 2020, 16:01 by we...@acu.edu:
> The fact that neither Eclipse nor NetBeans works "out of the box" on Debian
> just adds to that sentiment.
>
Eclipse runs fine on Debian, I've been running Eclipse on Buster for quite some
time without any issues worth mentioning. I suspect Netbeans
On Sat, Apr 18, 2020 at 8:26 PM local10 wrote:
>
> > Tutorial = https://netbeans.org/kb/docs/java/quickstart.html
> >
> > It's like the process to create the new project hangs.>
> > Ideas? Suggestions? (I'm pretty green/new with both IDEs and Java.)
>
> Tutorial = https://netbeans.org/kb/docs/java/quickstart.html
>
> It's like the process to create the new project hangs.>
> Ideas? Suggestions? (I'm pretty green/new with both IDEs and Java.)
You'll have more luck asking this question on the Netbeans user list. Possible
rea
bullseye/sid, Cinnamon Desktop
Netbeans IDE 10.0
kent@westk-9463:~/NetBeansProjects$ aptitude search jdk
i default-jdk - Standard Java or Java
compatible Development Kit
p default-jdk:i386 - Standard Java or Java
compatible Development Kit
i
floris writes:
> Cecil Westerhof schreef op 2019-08-03 11:55:
>> Als ik wil switchen van Java 11 naar 8 dan moet ik nu voor alle
>> programmas (java, javac, …) update-alternatives aanroepen.
>> Kan dat niet op een betere manier?
>
> Doet
> $ sudo update-java-alte
Cecil Westerhof schreef op 2019-08-03 11:55:
Als ik wil switchen van Java 11 naar 8 dan moet ik nu voor alle
programmas (java, javac, …) update-alternatives aanroepen.
Kan dat niet op een betere manier?
Doet
$ sudo update-java-alternatives -s java-1.8.0-openjdk-amd64
wat je bedoelt
Als ik wil switchen van Java 11 naar 8 dan moet ik nu voor alle
programmas (java, javac, …) update-alternatives aanroepen.
Kan dat niet op een betere manier?
--
Cecil Westerhof
Senior Software Engineer
LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/cecilwesterhof
Ik heb op mijn systeem zowel Java 8, 9 al 11 staan. Default staat
ingesteld dat java 11 moet worden gebruikt. Er is echter een programma
dat met 8 moet worden gedraaid dat in mij crontab staat. Dat heb ik nu
'opgelost' door het aan te roepen met:
/usr/lib/jvm/java-1.8.0-openjdk-amd64/bin/java
On 20/06/19 6:18 AM, basti wrote:
> Hello, i have an old Server with HP ILO2. The remote console on this
> version of ilo need an java browser Plugin (not webstart).
>
> in stretch there was no problem i have used an old firefox 36 or so in
> "portable" mode.
>
&
On 19.06.19 20:18, basti wrote:
> Hello, i have an old Server with HP ILO2. The remote console on this
> version of ilo need an java browser Plugin (not webstart).
>
> in stretch there was no problem i have used an old firefox 36 or so in
> "portable" mode.
>
&
Hello, i have an old Server with HP ILO2. The remote console on this
version of ilo need an java browser Plugin (not webstart).
in stretch there was no problem i have used an old firefox 36 or so in
"portable" mode.
now the icedtea plugin seem not available anymore.
does someone konw
Hello, i have an old Server with HP ILO2. The remote console on this
version of ilo need an java browser Plugin (not webstart).
in stretch there was no problem i have used an old firefox 36 or so in
"portable" mode.
now the icedtea plugin seem not available anymore.
does someone konw
dk-8-jre
> openjdk-8-jdk-headless and they will for sure pull in some dependencies,
> which is why openjdk-8-jdk does not install automatically.
>
That will not work either. The reason the '-t jessie-backports' option
is the right solution is that openjdk-8 requires a newer
ca-certificate
James H. H. Lampert wrote:
>> The following packages have unmet dependencies:
>> openjdk-8-jdk : Depends: openjdk-8-jre (= 8u171-b11-1~bpo8+1) but it is
>> not going to be installed Depends: openjdk-8-jdk-headless (=
>> 8u171-b11-1~bpo8+1) but it is not going to be installed E: Unable to
>>
On Tue, Dec 18, 2018 at 10:16:25AM -0800, James H. H. Lampert wrote:
> I'm endeavoring to get Java 8 onto our development instance, so that the
> Tomcat environment there matches that of our cluster nodes, and apg-get is
> not cooperating.
>
> This particular instance is a Bitnami
I'm endeavoring to get Java 8 onto our development instance, so that the
Tomcat environment there matches that of our cluster nodes, and apg-get
is not cooperating.
This particular instance is a Bitnami SVN/Trac server, with Tomcat 8
added to it, and running independently of the Apache server
Per cert, el que no sé, perquè només us he llegit en diagonal allò dels
applets de java, és si aquests, per la nova versió de Firefox a Debian
estable, podrien incloure's via backports, per exemple... O potser fins
i tot s'instal·len manualment...
Fins ara,
Joan Cervan
El Wed, 31 Oct 2018 10:09
Per cert, el que no sé, perquè només us he llegit en diagonal allò dels
applets de java, és si aquests, per la nova versió de Firefox a Debian
estable, podrien incloure's via backports, per exemple... O potser fins
i tot s'instal·len manualment...
Fins ara,
Joan
El Wed, 31 Oct 2018 10:09:03
enzillament no era possible. La única cosa raonable és seguir les
versions ESR de Firefox, o directament no donar suport de seguretat als
navegadores que s'inclouen amb Debian.
Si em donen a triar entre una versió insegura del programa que emprem
tots més sovint i a totes hores o sacrificar els apple
t; > El dc. 24 de 10 de 2018 a les 09:59 +0200, en/na Narcis Garcia va
> > escriure:
> >> Per aquests casos en què les subcontractes de les administracions
> >> públiques demanen Java, utilitzaré Icecat versió 52 (que es pot
> >> instal·lar amb els paquets de Tr
:59 +0200, en/na Narcis Garcia va
> escriure:
>> Per aquests casos en què les subcontractes de les administracions
>> públiques demanen Java, utilitzaré Icecat versió 52 (que es pot
>> instal·lar amb els paquets de Trisquel), i així puc admetre les
>> (indegudes
El dc. 24 de 10 de 2018 a les 09:59 +0200, en/na Narcis Garcia va
escriure:
> Per aquests casos en què les subcontractes de les administracions
> públiques demanen Java, utilitzaré Icecat versió 52 (que es pot
> instal·lar amb els paquets de Trisquel), i així puc admetre les
>
administracions
públiques demanen Java, utilitzaré Icecat versió 52 (que es pot
instal·lar amb els paquets de Trisquel), i així puc admetre les
(indegudes) actualitzacions de M.Firefox.
Imagino que tot això es resoldria si els desenvolupadors del
icedtea-plugin adaptessin el projecte a la nova interfície
Hola Narcis,
> Als repositoris (main) de Debian estable hi ha l'anomalia de què entren
> les noves versions de programari Mozilla, amb la qual cosa també entren
> els nous problemes com aquest: que ja anem pel Firefox 60 i aquest no
> admet el icedtea-plugin del mateix repositori.
>
> Algú
ues d'arreu comencen a integrar bastant les
> gestions telemàtiques amb certificat digital, DNI electrònic, etc.
> En el cas de les administracions a Catalunya (començant per la
> Generalitat), el què més fan és externalitzar el desenvolupament de tot
> això a empreses que se solen enfoca
solen enfocar a Java, i que no solen contemplar
una altra plataforma que no sigui Microsoft Windows.
Sorprenent és que l'únic sistema operatiu (que jo sàpiga) que
desenvolupa i distribueix la Generalitat és el Linkat, amb la qual cosa
hi ha una gegantina contradicció amb l'exclusió dels usuaris de
Hi,
I've used Eclipse in the past (IDEA for now) and Debian is the best OS
for Java development for me :)
The installation is pretty easy, you just have to download the tarball :
https://www.eclipse.org/downloads/packages/
You can choose the pre-package according to your language/usage
credentials.
I use Debian OpenJDK packages but applications like Eclipse and Maven I
install from tarballs and run with wrapper scripts so I can choose JDK
versions. In the Java ecosystem it seems much more common to bundle
dependencies with applications. This is quite different to the Debian
way
On Thu, Oct 18, 2018 at 09:48:54AM -0500, Kent West wrote:
>
>Thanks for your response, Roberto. That helps. I purged all I could find
>of Eclipse, and then downloaded their installer from the [2]eclipse.org
>website, and then their "Eclipse IDE fo
On Wed, Oct 17, 2018 at 9:39 PM Roberto C. Sánchez
wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 17, 2018 at 09:28:55PM -0500, Kent West wrote:
> >westk@westkent64:~$
> >i A eclipse-jdt - Eclipse Java Development Tools (JDT)
> >i A eclipse-pde - Eclipse Plug-in Development Envir
On Wed, Oct 17, 2018 at 09:28:55PM -0500, Kent West wrote:
>westk@westkent64:~$
>i A eclipse-jdt - Eclipse Java Development Tools (JDT)
>i A eclipse-pde - Eclipse Plug-in Development Environment (PDE)
>i A eclipse-platform - Eclipse platform without development plu
I know that running unstable runs the risk of broken software, but I've
been very happy with Sid since the days of Bo and Hamm (have I really been
running Debian for 20 years?!).
But it seems to be biting me lately. A couple of months ago I decided to do
a little self-learning of Java
a dedicated vm to talk to
the old stuff than carry old unmaintained java forever forward. The
resources to maintain a bunch of old java releases simply don't exist.
Mike Stone
Le 08/22/18 à 18:32, Sven Hoexter a écrit :
> On Wed, Aug 22, 2018 at 04:10:29PM +0200, Erwan David wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
>> Thanks. Alas I have some mangement console for (surprise ?) oracle SAN
>> storage which only work with oracle Java. I'll keep an working one for
Wed, Aug 22, 2018 at 04:10:29PM +0200, Erwan David wrote:
>
>Hi,
>
>> Thanks. Alas I have some mangement console for (surprise ?) oracle
>SAN
>> storage which only work with oracle Java. I'll keep an working one
>for
>> this...
>
>I hope it's not som
On Wed, Aug 22, 2018 at 04:10:29PM +0200, Erwan David wrote:
Hi,
> Thanks. Alas I have some mangement console for (surprise ?) oracle SAN
> storage which only work with oracle Java. I'll keep an working one for
> this...
I hope it's not something based on Webstart? Because
On Wed, Aug 22, 2018 at 11:55:49AM CEST, Sven Hoexter said:
> On Tue, Aug 21, 2018 at 05:49:19PM +0200, Erwan David wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > This package makes a .deb from oracle .tar.gz It does not package java
> > 9 nor java 10. Is there a problem with those vers
On Tue, Aug 21, 2018 at 12:30:49PM -0400, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote:
Hi,
> Incidentally, it has been a long time since I encountered any Java that
> would run on the Oracle JVM but not on OpenJDK. Are you sure you need
> to even bother with the Oracle JVM?
The main point so far w
On Tue, Aug 21, 2018 at 05:49:19PM +0200, Erwan David wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This package makes a .deb from oracle .tar.gz It does not package java
> 9 nor java 10. Is there a problem with those versions ? Is the
> packaged abandonned, and in this case is there anotehr method t
On Tue, Aug 21, 2018 at 05:49:19PM +0200, Erwan David wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This package makes a .deb from oracle .tar.gz It does not package java
> 9 nor java 10. Is there a problem with those versions ? Is the
> packaged abandonned, and in this case is there anotehr method t
Hi,
This package makes a .deb from oracle .tar.gz It does not package java
9 nor java 10. Is there a problem with those versions ? Is the
packaged abandonned, and in this case is there anotehr method to uses
oracle JRE on debian ?
--
Erwan
On 1/12/18, Bastien Durel <bast...@durel.org> wrote:
> Le vendredi 12 janvier 2018 à 04:20 -0500, Albretch Mueller a écrit :
>> java gives you error messages when you compile and run code with
>> different versions of the JVM
>>
>> while trying to update
Le vendredi 12 janvier 2018 à 04:20 -0500, Albretch Mueller a écrit :
> java gives you error messages when you compile and run code with
> different versions of the JVM
>
> while trying to update my box using apt-get I am getting:
> "openjdk-8-jdk is already the newest versi
1 - 100 of 6516 matches
Mail list logo
