On 2022-08-29, OB-Linux GNU wrote:
> Hello
>
> I use imapsync occasionally. In the new version, it sends emails to
> users at every run. I want to prevent this. (h...@imapsync.tk)
>
> is there any way to prevent this?
>
>
I don't think this soft is in the official repo
Hello
I use imapsync occasionally. In the new version, it sends emails to
users at every run. I want to prevent this. (h...@imapsync.tk)
is there any way to prevent this?
Hi Daniel and everybody,
It's a reply for the Daniel's message
https://lists.debian.org/debian-user/2016/10/msg00481.html
I encounter the topic sometimes, how about imapsync back into Debian?
As the author of imapsync, my quick answer is yes, I would be pleased
to see imapsync brought back
Florian Pelgrim writes:
>
> I wanted to start now a rant against Cyrus but holy shit... They have
> got a new website and it all looks modern... Maybe I should take a look
> on it again.
>
I don't care if it *looks* modern, as long as it has more information
than
Hi,
> It is a server with Squeeze and
> they do not even bother to use the LTS repositories, so more than two
> years ago that server is without security updates.
Problems I defently see to much in the web... :(
> So that is a not minor matter that we have to consider to be sure that
> this site
Daniel Bareiro:
> On 14/10/16 16:30, Jochen Spieker wrote:
>
>>> I am planning to migrate about 200 e-mail accounts from a mail server
>>> using Dovecot to a mail server running Cyrus.
>
>> Sounds weird! I though most people migrate _to_ Dovecot nowadays (if
>> they haven't already). Care to
ers accounts,
>> etc) in the source and destination servers. Following this course of
>> action, I found this [1] interesting article written by Falko Timme in
>> HowtoForge.
> Offlineimap can also do IMAP to IMAP synchronization. The author of
> imapsync mentions it on [4] as
R, system users accounts,
> etc) in the source and destination servers. Following this course of
> action, I found this [1] interesting article written by Falko Timme in
> HowtoForge.
Offlineimap can also do IMAP to IMAP synchronization. The author of
imapsync mention
pstream wishes. I suppose
> there are exceptions, but IMHO there aren't any exceendingly good
> reasons to have imapsync as one of them.
>
> I am not going to even bother trying to understand if we can actually
> distribute imapsync in Debian main given its very unusual license:
>
y good
reasons to have imapsync as one of them.
I am not going to even bother trying to understand if we can actually
distribute imapsync in Debian main given its very unusual license:
http://imapsync.lamiral.info/LICENSE
Besides, it looks like the software is priced extremely fairly. You pay
to he
it through IMAP. This would also be
agnostic to the storage mechanism used (MAILDIR, system users accounts,
etc) in the source and destination servers. Following this course of
action, I found this [1] interesting article written by Falko Timme in
HowtoForge.
But it seems that imapsync is no longer
On Mon, 20 Jun 2011 22:01:05 -0700, dlists wrote:
Would you know the reasons why imapsync has been in Lenny but no more
in squeeze nor sid?
Hey Mihamina,
Have a look at
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=609845#65 - it
seems
the author wanted it removed
On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 12:51 PM, Camaleón noela...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, 20 Jun 2011 22:01:05 -0700, dlists wrote:
Would you know the reasons why imapsync has been in Lenny but no more
in squeeze nor sid?
Hey Mihamina,
Have a look at
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin
On Tue, 21 Jun 2011 18:09:39 +0200, Javier Barroso wrote:
On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 12:51 PM, Camaleón noela...@gmail.com wrote:
Have a look at
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=609845#65 -
it
seems
the author wanted it removed because he started to
On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 6:19 PM, Camaleón noela...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, 21 Jun 2011 18:09:39 +0200, Javier Barroso wrote:
On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 12:51 PM, Camaleón noela...@gmail.com wrote:
Have a look at
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=609845#65 -
it
with precision No. Do what you want. I promise I won't
complain anymore about the fact imapsync is on Debian or not.
And
As far as I can see, the author of this software has even said in a
message in this bug report that You can even make [this software]
a GPL software[1], which I
On Tue, 21 Jun 2011 18:46:29 +0200, Javier Barroso wrote:
On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 6:19 PM, Camaleón noela...@gmail.com wrote:
(...)
[1] http://www.linux-france.org/prj/imapsync_list/msg00732.html
Yes, I've alredy read it, and...? I still don't get his point. What's
the gain in limiting its
On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 6:59 PM, Camaleón noela...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, 21 Jun 2011 18:46:29 +0200, Javier Barroso wrote:
On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 6:19 PM, Camaleón noela...@gmail.com wrote:
(...)
[1] http://www.linux-france.org/prj/imapsync_list/msg00732.html
Yes, I've alredy read it,
never said that. Quite the opposite:
Ein?
I repeat with precision No. Do what you want. I promise I won't
complain anymore about the fact imapsync is on Debian or not.
And
As far as I can see, the author of this software has even said in a
message in this bug report that You
On Tue, 21 Jun 2011 19:07:12 +0200, Javier Barroso wrote:
On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 6:59 PM, Camaleón noela...@gmail.com wrote:
If you buy it you can do what do you want (WTFPL license) with it, so
you can distribute if you want. But I imagine buying software to
distribute it is not the Debian
On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 12:19 PM, Camaleón noela...@gmail.com wrote:
Yes, I've alredy read it, and...? I still don't get his point. What's the
gain in limiting its distribution? You can still charge the users for it.
I think that the developer was pissed off by this email:
On Tue 21 Jun 2011 at 17:10:14 +, Camaleón wrote:
Great, but I've also read this (which is the reason why the packages was
removed):
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=609845#60
The Debian maintainer ceased to maintain the package and said why.
Nobody else has stepped
On Tue, 21 Jun 2011 13:28:11 -0400, Tom H wrote:
On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 12:19 PM, Camaleón noela...@gmail.com wrote:
Yes, I've alredy read it, and...? I still don't get his point. What's
the gain in limiting its distribution? You can still charge the users
for it.
I think that the
On Tue 21 Jun 2011 at 13:28:11 -0400, Tom H wrote:
On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 12:19 PM, Camaleón noela...@gmail.com wrote:
Yes, I've alredy read it, and...? I still don't get his point. What's the
gain in limiting its distribution? You can still charge the users for it.
I think that the
On Tue, 21 Jun 2011 18:41:42 +0100, Brian wrote:
On Tue 21 Jun 2011 at 17:10:14 +, Camaleón wrote:
Great, but I've also read this (which is the reason why the packages
was removed):
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=609845#60
The Debian maintainer ceased to maintain
Hi all,
Would you know the reasons why imapsync has been in Lenny but no more
in squeeze nor sid?
--
RMA.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org
On 21/06/11 14:46, Mihamina Rakotomandimby wrote:
Hi all,
Would you know the reasons why imapsync has been in Lenny but no more
in squeeze nor sid?
from:-
http://packages.qa.debian.org/i/imapsync.html
todo :- The package should be updated to follow the last version of
Debian Policy
Hi all,
Would you know the reasons why imapsync has been in Lenny but no more
in squeeze nor sid?
Hey Mihamina,
Have a look at
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=609845#65 - it seems the
author wanted it removed because he started to charge for the script
--
C
conseguido hacer funcionar imapsync para hacer la tarea,
alguien puede darme una ayuda???
Doy gracias desde ya.
Saludos...
_
Eduardo R. Barrera Pérez
Administrador Nodo Jovenclub
Pinar del Río
Web-Site: http://www.pri.jovenclub.cu
Jabber Email: ebarr
29 matches
Mail list logo