Re: imapsync notification

2022-08-29 Thread Curt
On 2022-08-29, OB-Linux GNU wrote: > Hello > > I use imapsync occasionally. In the new version, it sends emails to > users at every run. I want to prevent this. (h...@imapsync.tk) > > is there any way to prevent this? > > I don't think this soft is in the official repo

imapsync notification

2022-08-29 Thread OB-Linux GNU
Hello I use imapsync occasionally. In the new version, it sends emails to users at every run. I want to prevent this. (h...@imapsync.tk) is there any way to prevent this?

Re: imapsync and Debian. Yes we can!

2016-11-21 Thread Gilles LAMIRAL
Hi Daniel and everybody, It's a reply for the Daniel's message https://lists.debian.org/debian-user/2016/10/msg00481.html I encounter the topic sometimes, how about imapsync back into Debian? As the author of imapsync, my quick answer is yes, I would be pleased to see imapsync brought back

Re: imapsync and Debian

2016-10-17 Thread Mart van de Wege
Florian Pelgrim writes: > > I wanted to start now a rant against Cyrus but holy shit... They have > got a new website and it all looks modern... Maybe I should take a look > on it again. > I don't care if it *looks* modern, as long as it has more information than

Re: imapsync and Debian

2016-10-15 Thread Florian Pelgrim
Hi, > It is a server with Squeeze and > they do not even bother to use the LTS repositories, so more than two > years ago that server is without security updates. Problems I defently see to much in the web... :( > So that is a not minor matter that we have to consider to be sure that > this site

Re: imapsync and Debian

2016-10-15 Thread Jochen Spieker
Daniel Bareiro: > On 14/10/16 16:30, Jochen Spieker wrote: > >>> I am planning to migrate about 200 e-mail accounts from a mail server >>> using Dovecot to a mail server running Cyrus. > >> Sounds weird! I though most people migrate _to_ Dovecot nowadays (if >> they haven't already). Care to

Re: imapsync and Debian

2016-10-15 Thread Daniel Bareiro
ers accounts, >> etc) in the source and destination servers. Following this course of >> action, I found this [1] interesting article written by Falko Timme in >> HowtoForge. > Offlineimap can also do IMAP to IMAP synchronization. The author of > imapsync mentions it on [4] as

Re: imapsync and Debian

2016-10-14 Thread Jochen Spieker
R, system users accounts, > etc) in the source and destination servers. Following this course of > action, I found this [1] interesting article written by Falko Timme in > HowtoForge. Offlineimap can also do IMAP to IMAP synchronization. The author of imapsync mention

Re: imapsync and Debian

2016-10-14 Thread Daniel Bareiro
pstream wishes. I suppose > there are exceptions, but IMHO there aren't any exceendingly good > reasons to have imapsync as one of them. > > I am not going to even bother trying to understand if we can actually > distribute imapsync in Debian main given its very unusual license: >

Re: imapsync and Debian

2016-10-14 Thread Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
y good reasons to have imapsync as one of them. I am not going to even bother trying to understand if we can actually distribute imapsync in Debian main given its very unusual license: http://imapsync.lamiral.info/LICENSE Besides, it looks like the software is priced extremely fairly. You pay to he

imapsync and Debian

2016-10-14 Thread Daniel Bareiro
it through IMAP. This would also be agnostic to the storage mechanism used (MAILDIR, system users accounts, etc) in the source and destination servers. Following this course of action, I found this [1] interesting article written by Falko Timme in HowtoForge. But it seems that imapsync is no longer

Re: imapsync

2011-06-21 Thread Camaleón
On Mon, 20 Jun 2011 22:01:05 -0700, dlists wrote: Would you know the reasons why imapsync has been in Lenny but no more in squeeze nor sid? Hey Mihamina, Have a look at http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=609845#65 - it seems the author wanted it removed

Re: imapsync

2011-06-21 Thread Javier Barroso
On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 12:51 PM, Camaleón noela...@gmail.com wrote: On Mon, 20 Jun 2011 22:01:05 -0700, dlists wrote: Would you know the reasons why imapsync has been in Lenny but no more in squeeze nor sid? Hey Mihamina,       Have a look at       http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin

Re: imapsync

2011-06-21 Thread Camaleón
On Tue, 21 Jun 2011 18:09:39 +0200, Javier Barroso wrote: On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 12:51 PM, Camaleón noela...@gmail.com wrote:       Have a look at       http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=609845#65 -       it seems       the author wanted it removed because he started to

Re: imapsync

2011-06-21 Thread Javier Barroso
On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 6:19 PM, Camaleón noela...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, 21 Jun 2011 18:09:39 +0200, Javier Barroso wrote: On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 12:51 PM, Camaleón noela...@gmail.com wrote:       Have a look at       http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=609845#65 -       it

Re: imapsync

2011-06-21 Thread Brian
with precision No. Do what you want. I promise I won't complain anymore about the fact imapsync is on Debian or not. And As far as I can see, the author of this software has even said in a message in this bug report that You can even make [this software] a GPL software[1], which I

Re: imapsync

2011-06-21 Thread Camaleón
On Tue, 21 Jun 2011 18:46:29 +0200, Javier Barroso wrote: On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 6:19 PM, Camaleón noela...@gmail.com wrote: (...) [1] http://www.linux-france.org/prj/imapsync_list/msg00732.html Yes, I've alredy read it, and...? I still don't get his point. What's the gain in limiting its

Re: imapsync

2011-06-21 Thread Javier Barroso
On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 6:59 PM, Camaleón noela...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, 21 Jun 2011 18:46:29 +0200, Javier Barroso wrote: On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 6:19 PM, Camaleón noela...@gmail.com wrote: (...) [1] http://www.linux-france.org/prj/imapsync_list/msg00732.html Yes, I've alredy read it,

Re: imapsync

2011-06-21 Thread Camaleón
never said that. Quite the opposite: Ein? I repeat with precision No. Do what you want. I promise I won't complain anymore about the fact imapsync is on Debian or not. And As far as I can see, the author of this software has even said in a message in this bug report that You

Re: imapsync

2011-06-21 Thread Camaleón
On Tue, 21 Jun 2011 19:07:12 +0200, Javier Barroso wrote: On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 6:59 PM, Camaleón noela...@gmail.com wrote: If you buy it you can do what do you want (WTFPL license) with it, so you can distribute if you want. But I imagine buying software to distribute it is not the Debian

Re: imapsync

2011-06-21 Thread Tom H
On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 12:19 PM, Camaleón noela...@gmail.com wrote: Yes, I've alredy read it, and...? I still don't get his point. What's the gain in limiting its distribution? You can still charge the users for it. I think that the developer was pissed off by this email:

Re: imapsync

2011-06-21 Thread Brian
On Tue 21 Jun 2011 at 17:10:14 +, Camaleón wrote: Great, but I've also read this (which is the reason why the packages was removed): http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=609845#60 The Debian maintainer ceased to maintain the package and said why. Nobody else has stepped

Re: imapsync

2011-06-21 Thread Camaleón
On Tue, 21 Jun 2011 13:28:11 -0400, Tom H wrote: On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 12:19 PM, Camaleón noela...@gmail.com wrote: Yes, I've alredy read it, and...? I still don't get his point. What's the gain in limiting its distribution? You can still charge the users for it. I think that the

Re: imapsync

2011-06-21 Thread Brian
On Tue 21 Jun 2011 at 13:28:11 -0400, Tom H wrote: On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 12:19 PM, Camaleón noela...@gmail.com wrote: Yes, I've alredy read it, and...? I still don't get his point. What's the gain in limiting its distribution? You can still charge the users for it. I think that the

Re: imapsync

2011-06-21 Thread Camaleón
On Tue, 21 Jun 2011 18:41:42 +0100, Brian wrote: On Tue 21 Jun 2011 at 17:10:14 +, Camaleón wrote: Great, but I've also read this (which is the reason why the packages was removed): http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=609845#60 The Debian maintainer ceased to maintain

imapsync

2011-06-20 Thread Mihamina Rakotomandimby
Hi all, Would you know the reasons why imapsync has been in Lenny but no more in squeeze nor sid? -- RMA. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org

Re: imapsync

2011-06-20 Thread Scott Ferguson
On 21/06/11 14:46, Mihamina Rakotomandimby wrote: Hi all, Would you know the reasons why imapsync has been in Lenny but no more in squeeze nor sid? from:- http://packages.qa.debian.org/i/imapsync.html todo :- The package should be updated to follow the last version of Debian Policy

Re: imapsync

2011-06-20 Thread dlists
Hi all, Would you know the reasons why imapsync has been in Lenny but no more in squeeze nor sid? Hey Mihamina, Have a look at http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=609845#65 - it seems the author wanted it removed because he started to charge for the script -- C

Migrar buzones de un server imap a otro con (imapsync o imapcopy)

2009-02-26 Thread Eduardo R . Barrera Pérez
conseguido hacer funcionar imapsync para hacer la tarea, alguien puede darme una ayuda??? Doy gracias desde ya. Saludos... _ Eduardo R. Barrera Pérez Administrador Nodo Jovenclub Pinar del Río Web-Site: http://www.pri.jovenclub.cu Jabber Email: ebarr