@declude.com
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] No one at Declude?
Not that I can think of, the real advantage is it shuts off all internal
validations, AVG which has already stopped, SNF and CT which will stop anytime
soon.
-Original Message-
From: Andy Schmidt [mailto:andy_schm...@hm-software.com
Phew - thanks for posting this.
This WAS scary. Within a few minutes I had hundreds of spam emails in my
inbox... Stopped the SMTP service and Queue service. This CODE did seem to help!
-Original Message-
From: Stephan Chayer [mailto:scha...@intrasoft.net]
Sent: Wednesday, April 17,
Uh - but with that code, the internal SNF is turned off?
So one has to configure Sniffer has an external test with a separate Sniffer
license code?
-Original Message-
From: Stephan Chayer [mailto:scha...@intrasoft.net]
Sent: Wednesday, April 17, 2013 5:37 AM
To:
[mailto:david.bar...@mailsbestfriend.com]
Sent: Thursday, April 18, 2013 12:31 AM
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] No one at Declude?
Yes Internal Sniffer is no longer a valid option. Need to switch to external.
-Original Message-
From: Andy Schmidt [mailto:andy_schm...@hm
] No one at Declude?
If internal SNF is still ON then it can conflict with external Message Sniffer
by grabbing the port which SNF uses. By using our fix will ensure internal SNF
is turned OFF. If using the bypass key has everything OFF then that is fine too.
-Original Message-
From: Andy
Not to mention the grossly unethical, possibly illegal behavior of
abandoning people with active maintenance
I’m still prepaid until end of June…
From: Sanford Whiteman [mailto:sa...@figureone.com]
Sent: Monday, April 08, 2013 7:37 PM
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Subject: Re[2]:
If you're that small - how many PUBLIC domains do you have to be authoritative
for? What is the change frequency in a year, that you need this to be on your
local DNS.
For redundancy and availability purposes, why not host your public DNS at your
registry, block incoming DNS queries at your
March 1, 2013: NJABL is in the process of being shut down. The DNSBL zones
have been emptied. After the Internet has had some time to remove NJABL
from server configs, the NS's will be pointed off into unallocated space
(192.0.2.0/24 TEST-NET-1) to hopefully make the shutdown obvious to those
who
is NOT desirable
if they would have to follow the lead of Microsoft in this case – which is
getting it RIGHT).
Best Regards,
Andy
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to imail...@declude.com, and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail
).
If this is an arrangement you are willing to discuss, please email me directly.
Best Regards,
Andy
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to imail...@declude.com, and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail. The archives can be found
at http://www.mail
Most likely a malformed header created by the sending application.
Depending on how strict an application insists on CR/LF combinations (vs just
CR or just LF) – the attachment is either recognized as a distinct MAPI element
– or treated as excess junk in the headers or some previous MAPI
.
Best Regards
Andy Schmidt
Phone: +1 201 934-3414 x20 (Business)
Fax:+1 201 934-9206
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to imail...@declude.com, and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail. The archives can be found
at http
I had encountered the problem when I introduced another Declude add-on to the
mix (e.g., another command line program that Declude was launching). Eventually
there were too many command line processes using up too much heap…
Some of us were using the old command-line sniffer and 2 or 3
4:10 PM
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] error 0xC142 smtp.exe
That sounds like me. What’s the cure? Drop the number of threads in
declude.cfg? I haven’t looked at it yet to see what I have.
From: Andy Schmidt mailto:andy_schm...@hm-software.com
Sent
: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] error 0xC142 smtp.exe
That sounds like me. What’s the cure? Drop the number of threads in
declude.cfg? I haven’t looked at it yet to see what I have.
From: Andy Schmidt mailto:andy_schm...@hm-software.com
Sent: Thursday, May 05, 2011 1:05 PM
To: Declude.JunkMail
\proc\work\D216f00324ee89e2d.sm0]
Best Regards,
Andy
_
From: John T johnl...@eservicesforyou.com
Sender: John T johnl...@eservicesforyou.com
Date: Sat, 26 Mar 2011 16:09:11 GMT
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
ReplyTo: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] How
PS: appears they removed it in v10 – not just v11 (or v11.03).
I went back to version 11.02 installer, and after going through the entire
activation sequence for a new/second trial install – I ended up with 11.02 –
but no Imail1.exe. I don’t have a pre-version 10 installer laying around!
I suppose it depends on your clients. I host mostly small to medium business
sites, bounce on reverse DNS at my gateway and only get a question once or
twice a year, where I assist some clueless Email Admin about contacting his
ISP to set up the proper reverse DNS.
I explain to them that we
Not sure if you're asking how to trap items without reverse DNS?
It would be a line like this in the GLOBAL.CFG:
WHITELIST AUTH
REVDNS revdnsexists x x 5
0
(which would add a weight of 5 if there is no reverse DNS - but whitelist
to the 127.0.0.1 in IP v4 - which clearly is
internal and thus should not be evaluated for the Spamrouting test.
If Spamrouting (or Declude?) does not handle IP v6, then it probably should
at least SKIP those headers entirely?
Best Regards,
Andy
---
[This E-mail was scanned by Declude
to the 127.0.0.1 in IP v4 - which clearly is
internal and thus should not be evaluated for the Spamrouting test.
If Spamrouting (or Declude?) does not handle IP v6, then it probably should
at least SKIP those headers entirely?
Best Regards,
Andy
---
[This E-mail was scanned by Declude
spam
checks (we'll see which ones they are starting with.) I've been asking for
that for 10 years - so hopefully I'll be able to reject (some) spam outright
during the SMTP conversation.
Best Regards
Andy Schmidt
Tel. +1 201-934-9411, x20
Fax +1 201-934-9206
From: Eddie
Sent: Saturday, August
Server AV ScannerDave,
ClamAV works perfectly fine with Declude - runs as a service and thus is fast.
A native Windows version has been available for quite a while.
Best Regards
Andy Schmidt
Tel. +1 201-934-9411, x20
Fax +1 201-934-9206
From: Dave Beckstrom
Sent: Thursday, August 12, 2010 9
- if Sender header exists, compare THAT against MAIL FROM
- else, compare From header against MAIL FROM
Best Regards,
Andy
From: supp...@declude.com [mailto:supp...@declude.com] On Behalf Of Colbeck,
Andrew
Sent: Thursday, July 15, 2010 2:36 PM
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Subject
Hi Dave,
Unless that name server is listed in one of the RBLs already, you'd have to
set up your own RBL zone on your name server and then check against that.
Here's the appropriate section of the config file:
!--Enables the checking of the URI's name servers against an RBL. --
!--If
http://www.ftc.gov/opa/2010/05/perm.shtm
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to imail...@declude.com, and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail. The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.
have any use for it, I'll be happy to let you have
it. Instead of outputting database rows, you could certainly expand the
script to output a flat file instead or add alias items to the IMAIL
registry, etc.
Best Regards,
Andy
From: supp...@declude.com [mailto:supp...@declude.com] On Behalf
//
---
//
// Author: © 2005, Andy Schmidt
// Email: a...@argos.net
// Runtime: Windows Scripting Host 5.6
//
//
//
---
//
// CHANGE HISTORY
//
// 1.0.0 05-Apr-05 (AS) Initial Development
Hi,
Does anyone have a URL that works? I haven't been able to get
www.sorbs.net/lookup.shtml, or www.au.sorbs.net/lookup.shtml to come up?
I remember reading something last year that they had trouble getting a
hosting sponsor - but later they were acquired by GFI.
Best Regards,
Andy
ODBC lookups (ORF
supports ODBC, LDAP and AD lookups), then you're out of luck.
Anyway - I'm just sharing the code in case it helps Michael.
Best Regards,
Andy
From: supp...@declude.com [mailto:supp...@declude.com] On Behalf Of Darin
Cox
Sent: Wednesday, May 12, 2010 4:32 PM
Down?
It may have been down when you looked, Andy. It's up now.
Also, I like to use this 3rd party for an instant second opinion:
http://downforeveryoneorjustme.com
Andrew 8)
_
From: supp...@declude.com [mailto:supp...@declude.com] On Behalf Of Andy
Schmidt
and the time and date of the error.
From: supp...@declude.com [mailto:supp...@declude.com] On Behalf Of Colbeck,
Andrew
Sent: Wednesday, May 12, 2010 5:29 PM
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] SORBS Website Down?
It may have been down when you looked, Andy. It's
/).
Consequently, opening this file with an xml parser (even just IE) will
result in parser errors.
I suppose everyone should double-click that XML file and see if it actually
opens (assuming that this bug has been there since day 1).
Best Regards,
Andy
---
This E-mail came from
.
Best Regards,
Andy
From: supp...@declude.com [mailto:supp...@declude.com] On Behalf Of David
Barker
Sent: Wednesday, May 05, 2010 12:12 PM
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Sniffer IP Reputation -- Graduated Weight
Scheme
Just a thought. We would have
-RULES and SNFTRUNCATE (which also evaluate the GDUdb) -
and I'm wondering if eliminating the SNFIP and SNFIPREP and just sticking
with the SNF rules (which already has exit codes 20 and 63) will reduce the
Sniffer overhead by 2/3?
Best Regards,
Andy
From: supp...@declude.com [mailto:supp
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Sniffer IP Reputation -- Graduated Weight
Scheme
On 5/5/2010 1:30 PM, Andy Schmidt wrote:
Hi Dave,
Hm - yes,I think if you added 21 lines (from -10 to 0 and to +10) to the
config file, you would have could cover the reputation range from -1
these are NOT multiple lines of
the SAME command.
From: supp...@declude.com [mailto:supp...@declude.com] On Behalf Of Pete
McNeil
Sent: Wednesday, May 05, 2010 3:47 PM
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Sniffer Integration - Multiple Exit Codes
On 5/5/2010 3:24 PM, Andy Schmidt
SUBJECT [LAST ACTION=SUBJECT]
q4d2f8f571d69.smd Cumulative action(s) on this email = IGNORE SUBJECT
[LAST ACTION=SUBJECT]
Best Regards,
Andy
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to imail...@declude.com, and
type unsubscribe
for checking into this.
Best Regards,
Andy
From: supp...@declude.com [mailto:supp...@declude.com] On Behalf Of David
Barker
Sent: Monday, May 03, 2010 12:10 PM
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Reporting of Tests Failed Incomplete?
The Tests failed
the GDUdb) -
and I'm wondering if eliminating the SNFIP and SNFIPREP and just sticking
with the SNF rules (which already has exit codes 20 and 63) would further
reduce the Sniffer overhead by 2/3?
Best Regards,
Andy
From: supp...@declude.com [mailto:supp...@declude.com] On Behalf Of David
Hi Dave,
Thanks - I don't want to upset your development schedule (naturally, I can
cope with things as they are) - just wanted to make sure it's on someone
else list G.
Best Regards,
Andy
From: supp...@declude.com [mailto:supp...@declude.com] On Behalf Of David
Barker
Sent: Monday
Email security is our business
978.499.2933 office
978.988.1311 fax
dbar...@declude.com
-Original Message-
From: supp...@declude.com [mailto:supp...@declude.com] On Behalf Of Andy
Schmidt
Sent: Saturday, May 01, 2010 2:19 PM
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Subject: FW: [Declude.JunkMail
in light of
the fact that you just send me earlier SNFIP return codes that allow testing
for white).
Best Regards,
Andy
From: supp...@declude.com [mailto:supp...@declude.com] On Behalf Of David
Barker
Sent: Monday, May 03, 2010 3:40 PM
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Subject: RE
changes for BIG GBUdb values.
Best Regards,
Andy
From: supp...@declude.com [mailto:supp...@declude.com] On Behalf Of David
Barker
Sent: Monday, May 03, 2010 3:40 PM
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Sniffer IP Reputation for white listing
As Pete already
* 10 ) - 0 ) * -1 = -3
Reputation -1.0: ( ( 1.0 * 10 ) - 0 ) * -1 = -10
Best Regards,
Andy
From: supp...@declude.com [mailto:supp...@declude.com] On Behalf Of David
Barker
Sent: Saturday, May 01, 2010 10:11 AM
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Sniffer IP vs
I happen to run Invariant Software's Declude Analyzer (for Declude Virus
and Declude Spam).
-Original Message-
From: supp...@declude.com [mailto:supp...@declude.com] On Behalf Of David
Dodell
Sent: Saturday, May 01, 2010 12:39 PM
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Subject:
that is a
good enough compromise for day-to-day use.
Best Regards,
Andy
-Original Message-
From: supp...@declude.com [mailto:supp...@declude.com] On Behalf Of Pete
McNeil
Sent: Saturday, May 01, 2010 11:57 AM
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail
SNFIPTRUNCATE SNFIP x 6 10 0
there should/could be a:
SNFIPWHITE SNFIP x ??? -5 0
Best Regards,
Andy
-Original Message-
From: supp...@declude.com [mailto:supp...@declude.com] On Behalf Of Pete
McNeil
Sent: Saturday, May 01, 2010 11:57 AM
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Subject: Re
explaining the listing
method/policy - and that de-listing is automatic once spam stops) will be
important so that we can include that link in 5.7.1 rejection string. Don't
want to have to start answering individual inquiries.
Best Regards,
Andy
From: supp...@declude.com [mailto:supp
of having to specify each of the 18 (current) return codes
one at a time? The external Sniffer simply allow me to code:
SNIFFER external nonzero
D:\IMAIL\Declude\SNF\SNFClient.exe10 0
Best Regards,
Andy
From: supp...@declude.com
Thanks for clearing up that it doesn't work for the 2nd variable (I'm aware
that it is an internal and not and external test, and that it is the SECOND
variable, and that it only executes once, etc.)
As a suggestion, you might consider enabling the nonzero option for the
second variable as
From: supp...@declude.com [mailto:supp...@declude.com] On Behalf Of Andy
Schmidt
Sent: Friday, April 30, 2010 10:31 AM
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Sniffer Integration - Global Exit Code
nonzero?
Hi Dave,
Thanks for taking the time to explain it. I see
It is - and I agree with you!
From: supp...@declude.com [mailto:supp...@declude.com] On Behalf Of Matt
Sent: Friday, April 30, 2010 12:53 PM
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] We have opened up truncate.gbudb.net
Is the result code really 127.0.0.1? That is
and 63)? In other words, are those IP
addresses that generate a reputation factor of 0 ALSO reported as
Caution/Black or Truncate - if so, we'd now TRIPLE count that score.
Best Regards,
Andy
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail
) -
and I'm wondering if eliminating the SNFIP and SNFIPREP and just sticking
with the SNF rules (which already has exit codes 20 and 63) will reduce the
Sniffer overhead by 2/3?
Best Regards,
Andy
From: supp...@declude.com [mailto:supp...@declude.com] On Behalf Of David
Barker
Sent: Friday, April
Sent: Friday, April 30, 2010 7:07 PM
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Sniffer IP vs. Sniffer IP Reputation vs.
Sniffer Truncate
On 4/30/2010 5:16 PM, Andy Schmidt wrote:
Hi Pete,
I'm look over Decludes recommended Sniffer configuration and trying to
understand
: Friday, April 30, 2010 7:07 PM
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Sniffer IP vs. Sniffer IP Reputation vs.
Sniffer Truncate
On 4/30/2010 5:16 PM, Andy Schmidt wrote:
Hi Pete,
I'm look over Decludes recommended Sniffer configuration and trying to
understand how much
use to learn about your service, learn about the
listing/de-listing policy (and determine the status of their IP address in
case of a false positive)?
Best Regards,
Andy
_
From: Pete McNeil madscient...@microneil.com
Sent: Thursday, April 29, 2010 5:15 PM
To: declude.junkmail
for nonzero to
create a baseline weight, and then just add SNF tests for specific return
code if I want those specific ones treated with a higher weight?
Best Regards,
Andy
From: supp...@declude.com [mailto:supp...@declude.com] On Behalf Of David
Barker
Sent: Monday, January 04, 2010 9:54 AM
Hi,
How do I go about reporting ZeroHour false positives?
For the past few days, one of my cliens has been trying to email a (legitimate)
ZIP file with a DLL that keeps getting blocked by CommTouch.
How do I submit these D/Q files to get this problem fixed?
Best Regards,
Andy
a NON compatible format for compression the all-lists.dat
file?
If it was compressed using the native Windows format (considering that Declude
is a Windows application), the file could be used instantly!
Best Regards,
Andy
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list
: and we can report
it to Commtouch.
David Barker
VP Operations Declude
Your Email security is our business
978.499.2933 office
978.988.1311 fax
mailto:dbar...@declude.com dbar...@declude.com
From: supp...@declude.com [mailto:supp...@declude.com] On Behalf Of Andy Schmidt
Sent: Friday
...@declude.com] On Behalf Of Andy Schmidt
Sent: Friday, February 19, 2010 11:22 AM
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] AllLists.DAT in RAR Format?
Importance: High
Hi,
Obviously, I know that I can download third party tools to “unrar” the file –
but I REALLY hate nothing
.
What WOULD be a good feature, would be an SPF based domain whitelist!
It would be a conditional whitelist of senders that will ONLY be applied, if
SPF for that domain PASSES.
Best Regards,
Andy
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To
unsubscribe, just
: supp...@declude.com [mailto:supp...@declude.com] On Behalf Of Dean
Lawrence
Sent: Wednesday, January 20, 2010 9:24 AM
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Conditional Whitelist - Good Use of SPF!
Andy,
Since there is already an SPF Pass, Fail, and Neutral result
that people leave this turned off just because
they are not using Postini.
Best Regards,
Andy
From: supp...@declude.com [mailto:supp...@declude.com] On Behalf Of David
Barker
Sent: Monday, January 04, 2010 9:54 AM
To: declude.vi...@declude.com; declude.junkmail@declude.com;
declude.relea
04, 2010 11:38 AM
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Release 4.10.42
Hi Andy,
Happy New Year.
Is the annual cost of Sniffer now included with Declude?
The cost of Message Sniffer is not included in Declude Service Agreements.
If we have no custom
; Tue, 03 Nov 2009
14:58:19 +0200
Best Regards,
Andy
-Original Message-
From: supp...@declude.com [mailto:supp...@declude.com] On Behalf Of David
Barker
Sent: Thursday, November 05, 2009 10:57 AM
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.9.39
Hi Matt,
Sorry - but some of these are actually headers inserted by my OWN server. So
they are NOT forged.
Most of them are spam, but some of them were even false positives.
Best Regards,
Andy
From: supp...@declude.com [mailto:supp...@declude.com] On Behalf Of Matt
Sent
with parenthesis, but it does happen.
Matt
Andy Schmidt wrote:
Hi Matt,
Sorry - but some of these are actually headers inserted by my OWN server. So
they are NOT forged.
Most of them are spam, but some of them were even false positives.
Best Regards,
Andy
From: supp
if you actually posted what a header looked like before
Postini mangled it and what it looked like after Postini mangled it? I
guess, what I'm not grasping is, who inserted the original header that
Postini has tampered with - if Postini is the domain's MX?
Best Regards,
Andy
From: supp
recall having run into this problem in
the past. But, if my understanding is correct, then this would be a problem
in the Declude parser, if indeed the headers is formatted in accordance with
the RFCs?
Best Regards,
Andy
-Original Message-
From: supp...@declude.com [mailto:supp
the same Q/D files) after setting the log to
Debug mode.
Best Regards,
Andy
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to imail...@declude.com, and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail. The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.
@declude.com
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Suggestion: Quarantine problematic Q/D files
to match GP1/GP2 files
Sensitivity: Personal
Hi Andy,
In Declude \proc directory there is a directory called REVIEW which is
exactly for this purpose. In the Declude.cfg there is a directive that can
override
Hi David,
Thanks - we are running the 11.01 Preview - and did have SMTP problems. It
hasn't occurred since - so if it looks like an external issue, then it might
not be worth too deep an investigation.
Thanks for your response.
Andy
From: supp...@declude.com [mailto:supp
made available
proactively)
Best Regards,
Andy
From: Michael Graveen
Sent: Tuesday, August 11, 2009 7:43 PM
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Imail 11
I went to SmarterMail 4.x a few years ago (from IMail 8.05). I like the web
interface. Is it perfect
Imail 11 supports ActiveSync (e.g., I'm using it from my regular cell phone) to
synch contacts, emails, appointments, notes,...
From: Nick Hayer
Sent: Tuesday, August 11, 2009 6:43 PM
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Imail 11
SmarterMail. Its the way to go.
that your customers have to
flush their DNS cache to obtain the new server address?
Best Regards,
Andy
From: supp...@declude.com [mailto:supp...@declude.com] On Behalf Of David
Barker
Sent: Wednesday, July 08, 2009 11:04 AM
To: declude.vi...@declude.com
Subject: RE: [Declude.Virus] Commtouch
q93ea0001414e0aa2.smd Did not find [
alifeedb...@service.alibaba.com ] in [ merchand...@dollardays.com ] address
book
06/24/2009 23:59:58.680 q93ea0001414e0aa2.smd Finish Address Book WhiteList
Best Regards,
Andy
-Original Message-
From: supp...@declude.com [mailto:supp...@declude.com
Hi Dave:
Good to see that this is (apparently) now an automated procedure that keeps
a current file online for us.
Thank you!
Andy
From: supp...@declude.com [mailto:supp...@declude.com] On Behalf Of David
Barker
Sent: Monday, June 08, 2009 4:56 PM
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
of TESTSFAILED
filters) which groupings of tests might be testing/triggering on the same
aspect of a message. Currently ZEROHOUR appears to negate all the other
advantages of Declude!
Best Regards
Andy Schmidt
Phone: +1 201 934-3414 x20 (Business)
Fax:+1 201 934-9206
---
This E-mail
Uh - okay, that was the reason, why I wasn't able to purchase CommTouch back
when.
As a hosting provider (which includes providing mailboxes for the clients'
domains), that would fall under the umbrella primary function is to provide
Internet service.
If they would define ISP as Internet
: [Declude.JunkMail] CommTouch ZeroHour
Yes Internet access provider is a better description of ISP and how it is
understood by Commtouch.
David
-Original Message-
From: supp...@declude.com [mailto:supp...@declude.com] On Behalf Of Andy
Schmidt
Sent: Friday, June 05, 2009 11:30 AM
To: declude.junkmail
That's semantics - either are Malicious emails (Phishing are the new
Viruses - or sometimes just a precursor). Most malicious email scanners
now include phishing in their realm of responsibility. Bottom line: You
need to run a scanner, it will find malicious emails, whether you
technically would
Hi, is the jump from 4.4.25 ( release 4.4 ) to 4.5.26 (release 4.5)
intentional or a typo? If 4.5 is a new release, one would have expected it
to start at 4.5.) - and thus this latest build be referred to as 4.5.3 ?
-Original Message-
From: supp...@declude.com
Because it does a = comparison, you need to start with the greatest value
and work your way lower.
-Original Message-
From: supp...@declude.com [mailto:supp...@declude.com] On Behalf Of Serge
Sent: Sunday, February 08, 2009 7:58 PM
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Subject: Re:
in the domains MX record.
However, if the two @ records were missing - THEN this domain cannot be
reached by email and I would refuse any mail from any domain.com.
Best Regards,
Andy
From: supp...@declude.com [mailto:supp...@declude.com] On Behalf Of Harry
vanderzand
Sent: Tuesday
I wouldn't add anything to the score because it's very common (specially for
larger organizations) to have dedicated outbound servers, while all MX
records point to their anti-spam/anti-virus gateways!
The better approach would be to REDUCE the weight score if you receive mail
from a mail
is actually held.
Best Regards,
Andy
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Imail
Admin
Sent: Friday, December 05, 2008 8:56 PM
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] New Blacklist / Whitelist (Barracuda)
Hi,
A couple
[LAST ACTION=IGNORE]
set type=ptr
38.108.41.55
Non-authoritative answer:
55.41.108.38.in-addr.arpa canonical name =
55.0-63.41.108.38.in-addr.arpa
55.0-63.41.108.38.in-addr.arpa name = mail.cashcosmetics.info
Best Regards,
Andy
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail
to SURBL (I would
have expected SOME overlap, but not 100%).
Does anyone have any experience with multi.uribl.com?
Best Regards,
Andy
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail
understand you may not realize you are querying
URIBL since it is enabled by default, and we will take the necessary steps
to notify you, if possible, before blocking your queries from our public
mirrors.
So my option is their commercial (for fee) feed service.
Best Regards,
Andy
-Original
a) Pay $20.00 for another flavor of SPF - or do I see this wrong?
http://www.emailreg.org/
b) http://www.barracudacentral.org/rbl
Hadn't seen this one mentioned? Any experiences? Effective? False Positives?
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To
That really does NOT help. I know it failed the BADHEADERS test, otherwise I
wouldn't use the BADHEADERS tool to look up the cause. The explanation
doesn't need to tell me what's okay, I need to know what's NOT. After
reading the explanation I'm just as smart as before:
Results
The E-mail
I believe the routing test looks for emails hopping back and forth across
major regions. So, if the email was sent from the U.S. to China and then
back to the U.S., it should trigger. But, if a multinational company has I/T
resources (or registered IP addresses) south or north of the border, or if
,
Andy
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David
Barker
Sent: Wednesday, October 08, 2008 9:47 AM
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] country chain
If we look at the definition of the ROUTING Test.
This test
,
Andy Schmidt
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Craig
Edmonds
Sent: Tuesday, September 09, 2008 1:42 PM
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Re:Declude vs Perry (ES)
I am not a lawyer so dont understand 100%.
So Scott Perry agreed
Well, Darin - it may be relevant to look at the timeline.
Example:
1. Declude is developed
2. Declude is purchased
3. Developer keeps source code and NOW starts to reuse it to develop
DNSstuff.com
vs.
1. Declude is developed
2. DNSstuff is developed
What is the issue? What error message? Was it bounced mail? What did the NDR
say? I could be a recipient trying to forward mail to another server, or an
end-user trying to send email from home using their local ISP... etc.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL
Who isn't? g
Yes, we've been running Imail 10 from the start, now 10.01 and are using it
with Declude 4.4.16.
Best Regards,
Andy
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Justin
Moose
Sent: Friday, August 29, 2008 12:24 PM
To: Declude.JunkMail
1 - 100 of 829 matches
Mail list logo
