To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] SPAMDOMAINS update for the att conglomerate
Does anyone have an updated listed for SPAMDOMAINS test for the AT T
conglomerate?
I know there is .att. and bellsouth.com and sbc.com but what else is
there
that could originate from an att.com
@declude.com
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] SPAMDOMAINS update for the att conglomerate
John,
Can you list multiple REVDNS on a single line when using spamdomains?
For example
@bellsouth.net .bellsouth. isp.att.
Thanks,
Keith
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL
, October 26, 2007 10:46 AM
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] SPAMDOMAINS update for the att
conglomerate
You can but I think the limit is three.
Don't forget ATT/SBC is in bed with Yahoo so their email can come through
Yahoo too.
-Original Message-
From
: Monday, August 20, 2007 11:06 AM
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] SPAMDOMAINS update for the att conglomerate
Does anyone have an updated listed for SPAMDOMAINS test for the AT T
conglomerate?
I know there is .att. and bellsouth.com and sbc.com but what else
Does anyone have an updated listed for SPAMDOMAINS test for the AT T
conglomerate?
I know there is .att. and bellsouth.com and sbc.com but what else is there
that could originate from an att.com REVDNS?
John T
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To
unsubscribe,
Does the Spamdomains tests use the mailfrom or the From: address to compare
to the revdns.
I'm betting it is the mailfrom address.
Thanks
Stu
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude EVA www.declude.com]
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To
unsubscribe,
Sent: Friday, January 06, 2006 10:50 AM
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] Spamdomains test
Does the Spamdomains tests use the mailfrom or the From: address to
compare
to the revdns.
I'm betting it is the mailfrom address.
Thanks
Stu
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude EVA
Hi,
Can someone explain why this rule failed:
Spamdomains:
@msn.com.hotmail.
-
X-RBL-Warning: SPAMDOMAINS: Spamdomain '@msn.com' found: Address of
[EMAIL PROTECTED] sent from invalid bay104-dav2.bay104.hotmail.com.
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus
Scott,
When using the SPAMDOMAINS test we have the option
to put a string in the second column which will also pass the test,
e.g...
.hotmail.com .msn.com
like ".msn.com" is in the above
example.
I have a couple of SPAMDOMAINS where I would like
to have "No Reverse DNS" bea viable
I have a couple of SPAMDOMAINS where I would like to have No Reverse DNS
be a viable alternative to the domain but still block on everything
else. Can I just put that string No Reverse DNS in second column to
pass through domains which only match domain.com and No Reverse DNS?
Unfortunately,
Would this alternative filter work?
TESTSFAILED END NOTCONTAINS REVDNS
MAILFROM 1 ENDSWITH.msn.com
# ok it is from msn and there is no revdns
Ah, good thinking -- that should work. You might also want to add a line:
REVDNS END CONTAINS.msn.com
to make sure that
Hi;
Does anyone know
the spamdomain entry for Suntrust Bank?
@Suntrust.com .suntrust.com
Is it different
from above? I have not seen a legit email from Suntrust to use as a
guide.
Regards,
Kami
Is there a way to change the Spamdomains test to test the first rather
than last?
Our main e-mail address is hosted by another company and automatically
forwarded to me and the Spamdomains test is showing the forwarded
location.
John Olden - Systems Administrator
Champaign Park District
---
Franco-Rocha
Declude Technical Support
- Original Message -
From: John Olden [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, August 10, 2004 11:13 AM
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] Spamdomains
Is there a way to change the Spamdomains test to test the first rather
than last?
Our main
-
From: David Franco-Rocha [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, August 10, 2004 11:15 AM
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Spamdomains
It sounds like the problem is that Declude JunkMail is scanning the
first
hop (the forwarding server), which it should not be doing
I had a legit email fail Spamdomains for prodigy.net.
Received: from mail2.smart-mail.net [65.16.167.134] by net.smart-mail.net
(SMTPD32-7.15) id A31D87E00DE; Fri, 02 Jul 2004 08:29:01 -0500
Received: from smtp.prodigy.net.mx ([148.235.52.27])
by mail2.smart-mail.net (SAVSMTP 3.1.0.29) with
I had a legit email fail Spamdomains for prodigy.net.
X-RBL-Warning: SPAMDOMAINS: Spamdomain 'prodigy.net' found: Address of
[EMAIL PROTECTED] sent from invalid .
The problem here is that there appears to be no reverse DNS entry for the
IP that Declude JunkMail used. What IP did Declude
Scott,
AX-Declude-Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [148.235.52.27]
Todd
- Original Message -
From: R. Scott Perry [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, July 02, 2004 11:11 AM
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Spamdomains prodigy.net.mx
I had a legit email fail Spamdomains
AX-Declude-Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [148.235.52.27]
That's strange -- that IP does have a reverse DNS entry, and it is set up
properly. My guess is that they were having DNS problems where their DNS
servers were sending invalid data, which would account for the blank
reverse DNS entry that
Thanks Bill. I checked the archives and found one from Nov.28,2003 ... just
got it setup.
thanks again,
Larry Craddock
- Original Message -
From: Bill Landry [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, May 28, 2004 12:34 AM
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Spamdomains test
I think I need a little more detail on the spamdomains test. Here's the
entire explanation from the manual:
[This test will catch E-mail that is not coming from a mailserver that it
should be coming from. This test will only work if you set up a file listing
domains that you wish to be
But I'm sure I've seen discussion someplace with reference to lines
containing more than just a domain name in the spamdomains.txt file ... or
is that all that's needed besides enabling the test?
That's a new feature, that allows you to have an alias (for lack of a
better word) that can be
So a line example.com would require that any E-mail address from
@example.com must have a reverse DNS entry containing example.com.
However, if legitimate @example.com E-mail can also be sent from
@example.net, then you could have a line example.com example.net.
Scott, any thoughts
Using the dnsbl type of test and a custom zone, you could extend this
through DNS. For instance:
MPBL-SPAMDOMAINS dnsbl %REVDNS%.%RHSBL%.spamdomains.example.com
127.0.0.2 4 0
In your custom zone, you could construct records like so:
*.aol.com.aol.comA
127.0.0.1
TXT ( "Good
Using the dnsbl type of test and a custom zone, you could extend this
through DNS. For instance:
MPBL-SPAMDOMAINS dnsbl%REVDNS%.%RHSBL%.spamdomains.example.com
127.0.0.240
Interesting idea, Matt. Still way too much management compared to
SPF-compatible
I've been planing on trying this for about a week now, and I'm still
not convinced that it will work. From my standpoint though, this
represents a good way to remove a tad bit more processing and maintain
a system to be shared on multiple servers without having to update text
files.
This idea
Thanks everyone. Now that I understand how to use
the test, does anyone have a spamdomains.txt file that includes the entries for
the domains most commonly used that they could share?
Larry Craddock
- Original Message -
From: Larry Craddock [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thanks everyone. Now that I understand how to use the test, does anyone
have a spamdomains.txt file that includes the entries for the domains
most commonly used that they could share?
Check the archives, Larry. I have posted
-
From: Kami Razvan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, May 14, 2004 4:32 PM
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] SPAMDOMAINS works as ENDSWITH or CONTAINS?
I don't even know how to mentally parse the below code that you've
listed.
REVDNS END ENDSWITH .hotmail.com
MAILFROM 3
. Scott Perry [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, March 02, 2004 7:11 PM
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] SPAMDOMAINS works as ENDSWITH or CONTAINS?
If I have a SPAMDOMAINS type test in my GLOBAL.CFG...
SD-TLD spamdomains D:\iMail\declude\JunkMail.SpamDomains.TLD.txt x 5 0
Dan..
Can you not use a filter file for this?
Kami
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dan Geiser
Sent: Friday, May 14, 2004 9:09 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] SPAMDOMAINS works as ENDSWITH or CONTAINS?
Scott,
I
.
Thanks,
Dan Geiser
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Original Message -
From: Kami Razvan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, May 14, 2004 9:22 AM
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] SPAMDOMAINS works as ENDSWITH or CONTAINS?
Dan..
Can you not use a filter file for this?
Kami
Sent: Friday, May 14, 2004 9:31 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] SPAMDOMAINS works as ENDSWITH or CONTAINS?
Kami,
How do you see me using a filter file to add a small amount of points for
the end of every SENDER that doesn't match the end of every REVDNS in the
edu TLD.?
I
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] SPAMDOMAINS works as ENDSWITH or CONTAINS?
Dan..
May be I am not understanding the question. But I basically have a couple
of combination tests that are like the following:
REVDNS END ENDSWITH .hotmail.com
MAILFROM 3 ENDSWITH @hotmail.com
HELO 5 ENDSWITH
there's
been a lot of stuff introduced since our Service Agreement expired.
Thanks for your feedback.
Dan
- Original Message -
From: Kami Razvan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, May 14, 2004 9:40 AM
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] SPAMDOMAINS works as ENDSWITH
I just had an email fail spamdomains for [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-RBL-Warning: SPAMDOMAINS: Spamdomain 'swbell.net' found: Address of
[EMAIL PROTECTED] sent from invalid mta7.pltn13.pbi.net.
pbi.net is registered to SBC and is valid (pacific bell internet)
In my spam domains file I have this:
I just had an email fail spamdomains for [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-RBL-Warning: SPAMDOMAINS: Spamdomain 'swbell.net' found: Address of
[EMAIL PROTECTED] sent from invalid mta7.pltn13.pbi.net.
pbi.net is registered to SBC and is valid (pacific bell internet)
In my spam domains file I have this:
I believe you are only allowed two columns in the spam domain line.
Scott Fisher
Director of IT
Farm Progress Companies
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 05/11/04 03:40PM
I just had an email fail spamdomains for [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-RBL-Warning: SPAMDOMAINS: Spamdomain 'swbell.net' found: Address of
[EMAIL
Does anyone know a good spamdomains entry for the domain freeserve.co.uk?
dnsstuff.com returns no mx records.
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to
Hello,
Had a client forward me an e-mail that failed the SPAMDOMAIN test
(along with a couple others).
Below are the internet headers of the SPAMDOMAINs failure (I can
post the full inet headers if desired):
X-RBL-Warning: SPAMDOMAINS: Spamdomain 'att.net' found: Address of
[EMAIL
I'd be leary of a spamdomain
att.net .airdata.com
If you received e-mail from catt.net, it would fail the above line. I made up
catt.net, but valid non-ATT domains ending in att.net may exist.
perhaps
mobile.att.net .airdata.com
@att.net .att.net
or
.att.net.airdata.com
@att.net
Hello,
I got a message that was from [EMAIL PROTECTED] but came from
RoadRunners networks. There isn't a netscape entry in my SPAMDOMAINS.TXT
file. I was just wondering what I would enter to make it so.
I did a NSLOOKUP on netscape.com and the MX record points to
Ok.. Makes sense.. Thanks..
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Colbeck, Andrew
Sent: Monday, April 19, 2004 2:29 PM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] SPAMDOMAINS - Netscape.com
Jeff, the main problem with figuring
that they keep
their corporate domain for netscape.com separate from the customer business
as netscape.net ...
Andrew 8)
-Original Message-
From: Jeff Maze - Hostmaster [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, April 19, 2004 11:07 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] SPAMDOMAINS
: [Declude.JunkMail] SPAMDOMAINS - Netscape.com
Andrew and Jeff,
Unfortunately Netscape.net is actually handled by aol.com when it is
outgoing (which is what matters in this case). I sometimes search my
known good E-mail for outgoing servers, or Google for it by looking for
header code along with the address
for the seminal work on
sd.txt from which everyone has benefitted (hey, credit where credit is due!)
Andrew 8)
-Original Message-
From: Matt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, April 19, 2004 11:52 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] SPAMDOMAINS - Netscape.com
:
[Declude.JunkMail] SPAMDOMAINS - Netscape.comOops,
sorry. I'm not sure about netscape.com, but E-mail from that domain has
been quite rare in the past since they don't have hardly any employees, and
even if you had their primary reverse DNS entries, it's quite possible that
they send
Hello, All,
If I have a SPAMDOMAINS type test in my GLOBAL.CFG...
SD-TLD spamdomains D:\iMail\declude\JunkMail.SpamDomains.TLD.txt x 5 0
...and I have some entries in the corresponding flat text file like below...
# JunkMail.SpamDomains.TLD.txt
#
# ==
If I have a SPAMDOMAINS type test in my GLOBAL.CFG...
SD-TLD spamdomains D:\iMail\declude\JunkMail.SpamDomains.TLD.txt x 5 0
...and I have some entries in the corresponding flat text file like below...
.mil
will SPAMDOMAINS search the reverse DNS entry in a CONTAINS type manner or
an
Is somebody is using the spamdomains filter to detect paypal, ebay phish e-mails?
Could you please share the appropriate entries?
Or is using the spamdomains filter to do this a bad idea?
Scott Fisher
Director of IT
Farm Progress Companies
---
[This E-mail scanned for viruses by Farm Progress
Scott, I am noticing SpamDomains test is not working consistently. Lots of
messages are being properly flagged, but many that should be flagged but are
not. I can provide samples, if you would like.
Thanks for looking into this.
Bill
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus
Scott, I am noticing SpamDomains test is not working consistently. Lots of
messages are being properly flagged, but many that should be flagged but are
not. I can provide samples, if you would like.
Yes, samples would be very helpful. Also, what version are you running?
- Original Message -
From: R. Scott Perry [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Scott, I am noticing SpamDomains test is not working consistently. Lots
of
messages are being properly flagged, but many that should be flagged but
are
not. I can provide samples, if you would like.
Yes, samples would be
I have added a SpamDomains test to Global.cfg and junkmail.default file
SpamDomains is set to warn. I am running a backup mail server that forwards
mail to the system with Declude Junkmail. I do have an IPBYPASS entry for
the backup mail server.
My warn messages in the mail server look to
I am considering adding google.com to SPAMDOMAINS, as I see a number of spam
with a from address of @google.com. Can I safely assume that any legit
message from Google will be from a google.com server?
John Tolmachoff
Engineer/Consultant/Owner
eServices For You
---
[This E-mail was scanned for
When a message comes from an IP that has no PTR record, and the sender
domain is in the SPAMDOMAINS list, it is getting double penalized for the
same violation. That is not the desired effect.
Is there a way that SPAMDOMAINS can be configured not to fail if there is no
PTR record, based on the
that either have no PTR or have an invalid PTR.
Bill
- Original Message -
From: John Tolmachoff (Lists) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, December 13, 2003 12:52 AM
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] SPAMDOMAINS and REVDNS
When a message comes from an IP that has no PTR record
John, nothing should be listed in spamdomains unless it has a valid PTR ,
that's the very nature of the test - to test the mailfrom domain of a
message that has a matching domain listed in spamdomains (again, which
should already be confirmed to have valid PTR records), and reject those
that
: Matthew Bramble [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2003 8:23 PM
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] SpamDomains
Bill Landry wrote:
If you use the @ symbol in the first column, then you have severely
limited
yourself to supporting only one RDNS per domain.
I
Why would this be caught with SPAMDOMAINS when closeout-sale.com is not in
the spamdomains.txt file?
X-RBL-Warning: SPAMDOMAINS: Spamdomain 'domain.moc' found: Address of
[EMAIL PROTECTED] sent from invalid
mail.closeout-sale.com.
John Tolmachoff
Engineer/Consultant/Owner
eServices For You
Why would this be caught with SPAMDOMAINS when closeout-sale.com is not in
the spamdomains.txt file?
X-RBL-Warning: SPAMDOMAINS: Spamdomain 'domain.moc' found: Address of
[EMAIL PROTECTED] sent from invalid
mail.closeout-sale.com.
That's because the SPAMDOMAINS test looks for the domain within
John,
If you include an @ symbol before the domain name, it will stop it from
tagging this VERP stuff.
@domain.moc domain.moc
@aol.com .aol.com
@yahoo. .yahoo.
etc...
The only drawback here is that you can only have one match (the second
column) because the first
That's because the SPAMDOMAINS test looks for the domain within the E-mail
address, even if it appears in the username.
But wouldn't that create a lot of false positives in such things like
newsletters that have the receipients address embedded in the from address
as part of the user part?
PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] SpamDomains
John,
If you include an @ symbol before the domain name, it will stop it from
tagging this VERP stuff.
@domain.moc domain.moc
@aol.com .aol.com
@yahoo. .yahoo.
etc...
The only drawback here
: [Declude.JunkMail] SpamDomains
Why would this be caught with SPAMDOMAINS when closeout-sale.com is not
in
the spamdomains.txt file?
X-RBL-Warning: SPAMDOMAINS: Spamdomain 'domain.moc' found: Address of
[EMAIL PROTECTED] sent from invalid
mail.closeout-sale.com.
That's because
Bill Landry wrote:
That's why making the SPAMDOMAINS test an ENDSWITH instead of CONTAINS type
of test would resolve lots of these kinds of questions and headaches.
...and create some others at the same time. No one option is perfect,
so if Scott decides to change the functionality of this
]
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] SpamDomains
John,
If you include an @ symbol before the domain name, it will stop it from
tagging this VERP stuff.
@domain.moc domain.moc
@aol.com .aol.com
@yahoo. .yahoo.
etc...
The only drawback here is that you can only have one match
I don't know how hard it would be, but what about just adding in a pre filter in the
spamdomains test that will bypass the test. Like:
Spamdomains.txt:
[RDNS excluded from check]
ebay.com
greetingcardvendor.com
[includes]
.yahoo.com
@msn.com
etc, etc
This would also allow us to build our
PM
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] SpamDomains
I don't know how hard it would be, but what about just adding in a pre
filter in the spamdomains test that will bypass the test. Like:
Spamdomains.txt:
[RDNS excluded from check]
ebay.com
greetingcardvendor.com
[includes]
.yahoo.com
- Original Message -
From: Matthew Bramble [EMAIL PROTECTED]
That's why making the SPAMDOMAINS test an ENDSWITH instead of CONTAINS
type
of test would resolve lots of these kinds of questions and headaches.
...and create some others at the same time. No one option is perfect,
so
: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bill Landry
Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2003 8:20 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] SpamDomains
Everything is already excluded from the spamdomains test except that
which you specifically included. So I'm not sure I
PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2003 6:44 PM
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] SpamDomains
Say for example I have 10,000 people using MSN.com addresses to spam me
with.
I add the spamdomains test and enter in @msn.com into it.
Now it does well to stop the spammers, but now I am falsely
Jason,
I have a separate 'white' filter for that sort of thing :)
Matt
Jason Newland wrote:
I don't know how hard it would be, but what about just adding in a pre filter in the spamdomains test that will bypass the test. Like:
Spamdomains.txt:
[RDNS excluded from check]
ebay.com
Bill Landry wrote:
Having the ability to define the test type (*WITH) per line would be nice.
However, short of that, how many people would wonder why:
sale.com
in the spamdomains.txt file would cause this to fail:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
versus this in the spamdomains.txt file:
You CAN create your own RDNS whitelist. You can even use your DNS server to
maintain it.
Not sure if that's what your trying to do?
Best Regards
Andy Schmidt
Phone: +1 201 934-3414 x20 (Business)
Fax:+1 201 934-9206
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus
PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bill Landry
Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2003 8:20 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] SpamDomains
Everything is already excluded from the spamdomains test except that
which you specifically included. So I'm not sure I understand what
you're asking
PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] SpamDomains
Jason,
I have a separate 'white' filter for that sort of thing :)
Matt
Jason Newland wrote:
I don't know how hard it would be, but what about just adding in a
pre filter in the spamdomains test that will bypass the test. Like
- Original Message -
From: Matthew Bramble [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Having the ability to define the test type (*WITH) per line would be
nice.
However, short of that, how many people would wonder why:
sale.com
in the spamdomains.txt file would cause this to fail:
[EMAIL
that have the standard version are out of luck
:-(
Guess I have a good reason to upgrade now.
Jason
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matthew Bramble
Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2003 9:17 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail
Bill Landry wrote:
If you use the @ symbol in the first column, then you have severely limited
yourself to supporting only one RDNS per domain.
I don't feel limited, in fact, I have a lot more confidence in this test
not FP'ing on VERP stuff which may be forwarded to an account hosted on
my
Does any one know if vianet.ca is a valid domain use of simpatico.ca mail
servers?
X-RBL-Warning: SPAMDOMAINS: Spamdomain 'sympatico.ca' found: Address of
[EMAIL PROTECTED] sent from invalid shimmer.vianet.ca.
John Tolmachoff
Engineer/Consultant/Owner
eServices For You
---
[This E-mail was
Bill, it has been a lonnngg week.
John Tolmachoff
Engineer/Consultant/Owner
eServices For You
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To
unsubscribe, just send an
Why didn't this message fail spamdomains?
Received: from bzq-218-101-218.red.bezeqint.net [81.218.101.218] by
mail.localdomain.moc
(SMTPD32-8.04) id A88A13960090; Fri, 28 Nov 2003 14:56:58 -0500
Received: from [51.180.2.49] by bzq-218-101-218.red.bezeqint.net id
5JCQ8r8Lw22M; Fri, 28 Nov 2003
) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, November 28, 2003 5:24 PM
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] SpamDomains
Why didn't this message fail spamdomains?
Received: from bzq-218-101-218.red.bezeqint.net [81.218.101.218] by
mail.localdomain.moc
(SMTPD32-8.04) id A88A13960090; Fri, 28 Nov
Can somebody point me to a source for a SpamDomains text file so I can do
some comparisons...
Rich
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL
Can anybody give me a clue as to why my spamdomains test doesn't work? I
have this in global.cfg
SPAMDOMAINSspamdomains x x 15 0
and this in $default$.junkmail : SPAMDOMAINS WARN
and a text file named spamdomains.txt in /imail/declude
The line in
What do you have in your spamdomains.txt file?
Bill
- Original Message -
From: David Daniels [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, November 26, 2003 1:46 PM
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] Spamdomains
Can anybody give me a clue as to why my spamdomains test doesn't work
because you didn't tell declude the name of the file:
SPAMDOMAINS spamdomains C:\IMail\Declude\spamdomains.txtx 6
0
-Original Message-
From:David Daniels
Can anybody give me a clue as to why my spamdomains test doesn't work? I
have this in
: [Declude.JunkMail] Spamdomains
Can anybody give me a clue as to why my spamdomains test doesn't work? I
have this in global.cfg
SPAMDOMAINSspamdomains x x 15
0
and this in $default$.junkmail : SPAMDOMAINS WARN
and a text file named spamdomains.txt
Ebay and greeting card companies fail the SPAMDOMAINS test on a regular
basis. Since they also fail the nopostmaster and noabuse and a few other
small ones, this adds up to a reject.
Any suggestions on keeping these false positives from happening? Christmas
is coming and the E-cards are going to
Both might be failing because of the way you have it set up. I just
started to configure this on my server, and the way I am doing it is as
follows:
@ebay.com .ebay.
@hotmail.com .hotmail.
@verizon.net .verizon.
@yahoo. .yahoo.
When you include the @, it will prevent the test from
I'm pretty sure that you can have multiple listings for either column
also, so the filter looks for either no failures or no passes when
considering whether or not the test was failed as a whole (Scott, please
correct me if I'm wrong).
No. Each line is treated separately
If you have a line
Shoot. Thanks for the clarification.
Instead of making another feature suggestion, could you maybe give us a
little insight into what you have planned if anything for filtering in
general. No need to go too far out and nothing at all in the short-term
would be fully understood.
Thanks,
Instead of making another feature suggestion, could you maybe give us a
little insight into what you have planned if anything for filtering in
general. No need to go too far out and nothing at all in the short-term
would be fully understood.
Most of what appears in the suggestion database
This may have been asked already, but I could not find it in the archives...
in the spamdomains.txt file, can I use an entry like:
.br
to block all mail from Brazil or is that going to be too broad?
That would work (blocking any E-mail with a return address with .br in
it, which came from a
Title: Message
This may have been
asked already, but I could not find it in the archives...
in the
spamdomains.txt file, can I use an entry like:
.br
to block all mail
from Brazil or is that going to be too broad?
Jon
Lapp
Computer
Systems Specialist
Northstar
Computer Forms, Inc.
I would like to see an updated list also.
Todd
- Original Message -
From: John Tolmachoff (Lists) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, September 13, 2003 3:56 PM
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] SPAMDOMAINS
Any one have an updated list to share?
John Tolmachoff MCSE
Any one have an updated list to share?
John Tolmachoff MCSE CSSA
Engineer/Consultant
eServices For You
www.eservicesforyou.com
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To
unsubscribe, just
A few days ago I mentioned that I've had to reduce the weight I give to
the spamdomains test
drastically due to false positives. Here is an example of the type of
thing I am running into:
...
Again, this isn't a criticism. I just wanted to show what is happening in
the real world.
Just a few
A few days ago I mentioned that I've had to reduce the weight I give to the
spamdomains test
drastically due to false positives. Here is an example of the type of thing I am
running into:
Received: from picturecd3.kodak.com [192.232.121.230] by netinteraction.com with ESMTP
(SMTPD32-7.13) id
1 - 100 of 193 matches
Mail list logo
