Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Whitelisting Bug?

Hi Mark, Are you certain the user does not have their own address in their webmail address book? This looks like a typical problem where users have their own email address in the address book. Removing their email address and explaining to them why they should avoid putting in their own addre

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] WhiteListing Isses

Yes I think it should be possible. I think it is a great idea. David Barker From: "Christopher Jaime" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, December 05, 2008 5:41 PM To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] WhiteListi

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] WhiteListing Isses

David Barker, As a feature request, is it possible to add an option AUTOWHITELIST ON to ignore a user's self added email address in their address book? - Chris J. - Original Message - From: "Michael Jaworski" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Monday, December 01, 2008 4:35 PM Subject

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] whitelisting/negative weights with DNSWL.org

: declude.junkmail@declude.com Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] whitelisting/negative weights with DNSWL.org -David I think you messed up on all the ones with a 0 in the third octet. I also chose to run it only on the last header. I wouldn't whitelist/credit on any information on any previous heade

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] whitelisting/negative weights with DNSWL.org

/DYNA/(there is another one too I think) in the test name. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David Barker Sent: Monday, July 30, 2007 7:53 AM To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] whitelisting/negative weights

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] whitelisting/negative weights with DNSWL.org

-UNSPEC-HIGH IP4Rlist.dnswl.org 127.0.10.3 -10 0 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Scott Fisher Sent: Saturday, July 28, 2007 11:57 AM To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] whitelisting

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] whitelisting/negative weights with DNSWL.org

I'll give it a try. Here's what I will use/ DNSWL-FINANCIAL-NONEdnsbl %IP4R%.list.dnswl.org 127.0.2.0 0 0 DNSWL-FINANCIAL-LOW dnsbl %IP4R%.list.dnswl.org 127.0.2.1 0 0 DNSWL-FINANCIAL-MEDIUM dnsbl %IP4R%.list.dnswl.org 127.0.2.2

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] whitelisting/negative weights with DNSWL.org

Ewww. Look at all the return codes! I'd be interested in seeing some rates. Does it hit enough to work? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Gary Steiner Sent: Friday, July 27, 2007 6:42 PM To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Subject: [Declude.Jun

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] whitelisting based on rev dns

esday, November 08, 2006 4:13 PM Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] whitelisting based on rev dns Is the Reverse DNS in the headers anywhere? I've just been going out to DNSReports.com and pulling it for the ones I want to add. Easier way? Todd -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROT

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] whitelisting based on rev dns

TECTED]] On> Behalf Of Todd Richards> Sent: Wednesday, November 08, 2006 1:13 PM> To: declude.junkmail@declude.com> Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] whitelisting based on rev dns>> Is the Reverse DNS in the headers anywhere?  I've just been> going out to DNSReports.com a

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] whitelisting based on rev dns

, 2006 04:13 PM To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] whitelisting based on rev dns Is the Reverse DNS in the headers anywhere? I've just been going out to DNSReports.com and pulling it for the ones I want to add. Easier way? Todd -Original Message- F

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] whitelisting based on rev dns

Evanitsky Sent: Wednesday, November 08, 2006 12:56 PM To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] whitelisting based on rev dns Importance: High On Nov 8, 2006, at 1:24 PM, Craig Edmonds wrote: > How can I whitelist based on Reverse DNS? Create a filter with line

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] whitelisting based on rev dns

12:56 PM To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] whitelisting based on rev dns Importance: High On Nov 8, 2006, at 1:24 PM, Craig Edmonds wrote: > How can I whitelist based on Reverse DNS? Create a filter with lines like REVDNS xxx ENDSWITH .abcdefghi.com wher

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] whitelisting based on rev dns

Absolutely,   WHITELIST  REVDNS  .declude.com   You can also can create your own RDNSBL zone in your DNS server (that's what I did) and create one for SPF domains that spammers set up to reliably reject mail based on reverse DNS (thank you for them adhering to SPF!). Then you set up a Whit

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] whitelisting based on rev dns

Craig Edmonds wrote: How can I whitelist based on Reverse DNS? REMOTEIP    WHITELIST    CIDR        64.4.240.0/20 REVDNS        WHITELIST    ENDSWITH    .paypal.com etc... -Nick   Kindest Regards Craig Edmonds 123 Marbella Internet W: www.123marbella.com     --- This E

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] whitelisting based on rev dns

On Nov 8, 2006, at 1:24 PM, Craig Edmonds wrote: How can I whitelist based on Reverse DNS? Create a filter with lines like REVDNS xxx ENDSWITH .abcdefghi.com where xxx is weight to apply. Xxx could be a very high number to cause the message to be deleted or it could be a negative numbe

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] whitelisting based on rev dns

Craig, I don't use any of the Declude WHITELIST features due to the potential for giving the sender carte blanche access; if a known good sender is sending crap, I still want to have a chance to block the crap.   What I do is counterweight.   I create a filter file called, say, CounterWeight.

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] whitelisting based on rev dns

How about negative weighting instead of whitelisting.   If you want to do it selectively, you can create a quick Declude filter that you give a high negative weight to, and only include the domains that you want to pass through based on having REVDNS entries. Darin.     - Original Messag

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Whitelisting flaw in Declude?

: declude.junkmail@declude.com Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Whitelisting flaw in Declude?   Yeah, what Matt said.   Message splitting before junkmail filtering would be punishing for CPU time and somewhat more for disk time; message splitting for the sake of whitelisting (or alternate actions) after

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Whitelisting flaw in Declude?

ntence... -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of David Barker Sent: Wednesday, October 18, 2006 9:30 AM To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Whitelisting flaw in Declude? To create a duplicate message for each recipie

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Whitelisting flaw in Declude?

ailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of David Barker Sent: Wednesday, October 18, 2006 9:30 AM To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Whitelisting flaw in Declude? To create a duplicate message for each recipient is not a trivial issue. This is a function of the mail serve

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Whitelisting flaw in Declude?

Darrell ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) Sent: Wednesday, October 18, 2006 10:48 AM To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Whitelisting flaw in Declude? Mail gateways or anti-spam products for mail gateways? Darrell

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Whitelisting flaw in Declude? - David Barker

e - From: "Dave Beckstrom" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Wednesday, October 18, 2006 12:27 PM Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Whitelisting flaw in Declude? - David Barker Darin, We don't whitelist those addresses at all. But I could see other companies wanting to do so. Thi

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Whitelisting flaw in Declude?

Of David Barker Sent: Wednesday, October 18, 2006 9:30 AM To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Whitelisting flaw in Declude? To create a duplicate message for each recipient is not a trivial issue. This is a function of the mail server not Declude. David Barker Director

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Whitelisting flaw in Declude?

0:48 AM > To: declude.junkmail@declude.com > Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Whitelisting flaw in Declude? > > Mail gateways or anti-spam products for mail gateways? > > Darrell > --- > - > Check out http:/

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Whitelisting flaw in Declude?

Integration, and Log Parsers. - Original Message - From: "Kevin Bilbee" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Wednesday, October 18, 2006 1:16 PM Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Whitelisting flaw in Declude? Other mail gateways do it. Why would it be so difficult to duplicate the messag

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Whitelisting flaw in Declude?

t: Wednesday, October 18, 2006 6:30 AM > To: declude.junkmail@declude.com > Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Whitelisting flaw in Declude? > > To create a duplicate message for each recipient is not a trivial > issue. > This is a function of the mail server not Declude. > >

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Whitelisting flaw in Declude? - David Barker

Monitoring, SURBL/URI integration, MRTG Integration, and Log Parsers. - Original Message - From: "Dave Beckstrom" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Wednesday, October 18, 2006 12:06 PM Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Whitelisting flaw in Declude? - David Barker David, I agree.

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Whitelisting flaw in Declude? - David Barker

ginal Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Darin Cox > Sent: Wednesday, October 18, 2006 11:15 AM > To: declude.junkmail@declude.com > Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Whitelisting flaw in Declude? - David Barker > > Hi Dave, > > A

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Whitelisting flaw in Declude? - David Barker

October 18, 2006 12:06 PM Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Whitelisting flaw in Declude? - David Barker David, I agree. But I do think the whitelisting needs to be changed. I think you should add a WhitelistUnique tag. EG: WhitelistUnique TO: [EMAIL PROTECTED] The way the tag would functi

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Whitelisting flaw in Declude? - David Barker

arker > Sent: Wednesday, October 18, 2006 8:30 AM > To: declude.junkmail@declude.com > Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Whitelisting flaw in Declude? > > To create a duplicate message for each recipient is not a trivial issue. > This is a function of the mail server not Declude. &

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Whitelisting flaw in Declude?

: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kevin Bilbee Sent: Tuesday, October 17, 2006 5:08 PM To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Whitelisting flaw in Declude? Delcude has always functioned like this. What declude could do in this case is to duplicate

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Whitelisting flaw in Declude?

ting could allow everything else through. Darin. - Original Message - From: "Dave Beckstrom" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Tuesday, October 17, 2006 8:13 PM Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Whitelisting flaw in Declude? Hi Darin, Thanks for the great explanation. You

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Whitelisting flaw in Declude?

email has multiple recipients and only one of whom is in the whitelist? > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Darin Cox > Sent: Tuesday, October 17, 2006 2:37 PM > To: declude.junkmail@declude.com > Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMai

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Whitelisting flaw in Declude?

nal Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of > Darin Cox > Sent: Tuesday, October 17, 2006 12:37 PM > To: declude.junkmail@declude.com > Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Whitelisting flaw in Declude? > > It's actually more of an issue o

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Whitelisting flaw in Declude?

ole other topic. Darin. - Original Message - From: "Dave Beckstrom" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Tuesday, October 17, 2006 3:11 PM Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Whitelisting flaw in Declude? I would call that a flaw, then, in how Declude processes the whitelist. I have

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Whitelisting flaw in Declude?

> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Darrell > ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) > Sent: Tuesday, October 17, 2006 11:25 AM > To: declude.junkmail@declude.com > Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Whitelisting flaw in Declude? > > If one user is whitelisted th

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Whitelisting flaw in Declude?

If one user is whitelisted they all will be whitelisted for that email. There are some things you can do to prevent this like BYPASSWHITELIST test. Darre;; Check out http://www.invariantsystems.com for utilities for Declude

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Whitelisting not working for all items

] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Samuel J Stanaitis Sent: Monday, February 06, 2006 12:47 PM To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Whitelisting not working for all items   I’ve had the whitelist miss addresses quite a bit…  Seems to work better for just @domain.com

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Whitelisting not working for all items

ers.regsoft.com).  You might try adding WHITELIST FROM .REGSOFT.COM in addition. - Original Message - From: Samuel J Stanaitis To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Sent: Monday, February 06, 2006 11:47 AM Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Whitelisting not working for all

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Whitelisting not working for all items

Title: Whitelisting not working for all items I’ve had the whitelist miss addresses quite a bit…  Seems to work better for just @domain.com and not the whole address in my situation…   Cheers, Sam   Samuel J Stanaitis, Network Administrator Decorative Product Source, Inc. (877)-650

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Whitelisting email address

ROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of IS - Systems Eng. (Karl Drugge)Sent: Tuesday, January 17, 2006 5:18 PMTo: Declude.JunkMail@declude.comSubject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Whitelisting email address Believe me, I’d love to find a way to do it, but when I HAVE to receive emails

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Whitelisting email address

28 PM To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Whitelisting email address   Karl, Getting blacklisted for bouncing spam back to forged addresses would probably be a lot worse than missing a stray message that shouldn't have been blocked.  This certa

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Whitelisting email address

kMail@declude.com Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Whitelisting email address Believe me, I'd love to find a way to do it, but when I HAVE to receive emails from hideously mis-configured servers, whack-job citizens, and other municipalities with less then stellar I.T. staff. from any where at any time, no

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Whitelisting email address

] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matt Sent: Tuesday, January 17, 2006 4:28 PM To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Whitelisting email address   Karl, Getting blacklisted for bouncing spam back to forged addresses would probably be a lot worse than missing a stray

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Whitelisting email address

:38 PM To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Whitelisting email address What are you using for a hold weight and delete weight? Brian - Original Message - From: IS - Systems Eng. (Ka

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Whitelisting email address

  Karl Drugge             -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Brian Sent: Tuesday, January 17, 2006 3:38 PM To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Whitelisting email address   What are

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Whitelisting email address

:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Brian Sent: Tuesday, January 17, 2006 3:38 PM To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Whitelisting email address   What are you using for a hold weight and delete weight?   Brian   - Original Message - From

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Whitelisting email address

What are you using for a hold weight and delete weight?   Brian   - Original Message - From: IS - Systems Eng. (Karl Drugge) To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Sent: Tuesday, January 17, 2006 3:17 PM Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Whitelisting email address I can confirm that

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Whitelisting email address

Behalf Of Brian Sent: Tuesday, January 17, 2006 2:16 PM To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Whitelisting email address   I recall that happening with IMail as well.  That is why I was wondering if I did something wrong before.   Brian

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Whitelisting email address

I recall that happening with IMail as well.  That is why I was wondering if I did something wrong before.   Brian   - Original Message - From: Shayne Embry To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Sent: Tuesday, January 17, 2006 1:12 PM Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Whitelisting email

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Whitelisting email address

@declude.com Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Whitelisting email address   Can't he go into global.cfg and use WHITELIST TO receiving_domain   or is that a Pro version thing?   John   From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Shayne Embry Sent: Tuesday, January 17,

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Whitelisting email address

Can't he go into global.cfg and use WHITELIST TO receiving_domain   or is that a Pro version thing?   John From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Shayne EmbrySent: Tuesday, January 17, 2006 12:12 PMTo: Declude.JunkMail@declude.comSubject: Re: [Declude.Jun

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Whitelisting email address

We have found that if one of the addresses is whitelisted, then every recipient's address gets whitelisted. This may be unique to SmarterMail/Declude. I don't remember having the problem with IMail, but we haven't used it in over a year.Shayne Hi Brian,   Yes, this can be done with the Pro versio

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Whitelisting email address

Hi Brian,   Yes, this can be done with the Pro version. You can have per-user configurations. You can't not have Declude scan the mail, but you can set this individual's configuration to ignore all test results and deliver the mail. As far as I know, this shouldn't have any affect on other recipien

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Whitelisting

Title: Message thanks scott, that confirms my thoughts    - Original Message - From: Scott Fisher To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Sent: Monday, October 31, 2005 2:38 PM Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Whitelisting I'm pretty confident tha

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Whitelisting

You can double check by scanning the whitelist section in your global.cfg file and address books for the text string. Travis - Original Message - From: "Serge" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Monday, October 31, 2005 10:39 AM Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMa

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Whitelisting

Title: Message I'm pretty confident that the "Skipping4 E-mail from " means an address book whitelist. - Original Message - From: Serge To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Sent: Monday, October 31, 2005 3:35 AM Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] Whitelisting Hi a

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Whitelisting

ernet" - Original Message - From: David Franco-Rocha [ Declude ] To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Sent: Tuesday, July 26, 2005 8:59 AM Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Whitelisting Richard, The problem here is, first of all, that Declude does not look at the cc: or bcc: in t

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Whitelisting

eaner Internet" - Original Message - From: David Franco-Rocha [ Declude ] To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Sent: Tuesday, July 26, 2005 8:59 AM Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Whitelisting Richard,   The problem here is, first of all, that Declude

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Whitelisting

Richard,   The problem here is, first of all, that Declude does not look at the cc: or bcc: in the headers. It deals with recipients of the email solely on the basis of what is in the message envelope (q*.smd file), which is discarded by IMail after processing; all you eventually see is the

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Whitelisting

Matt, Thanks, that fixed it right away. -Chris --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com.

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Whitelisting

Chris, That's not a valid entry, you only have three of the dotted quads and the Global.cfg requires either a full IP or a CIDR range. For the class C you would want to use 66.155.125/24. Matt Chris Anton wrote: Hi All, Having trouble whitelisting a specific Class C IP range in Junkmail Standa

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Whitelisting

I messed that up, it should be 66.155.125.0/24 Matt Chris Anton wrote: Hi All, Having trouble whitelisting a specific Class C IP range in Junkmail Standard. Using the "WHITELIST IP 66.155.125" in global.cfg (separated by spaces, not tabs). Syntax seems identical to the one listed in the

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Whitelisting our Domain

Jaworski > Sent: Tuesday, April 05, 2005 3:06 PM > To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com > Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Whitelisting our Domain > > My reading was Declude uses the SmartMail Address book as it is used in > iMail but does not yet look at the white list feature i

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Whitelisting our Domain

. - Original Message - From: "Darin Cox" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Tuesday, April 05, 2005 5:34 PM Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Whitelisting our Domain Being in Florida, we use gators. We tried the usual pigeons initially, but they got eaten by the gators. Some

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Whitelisting our Domain

: Tuesday, April 05, 2005 3:00 PM To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Whitelisting our Domain See previous post SmarterMail does support SMTP Auth but it does not at this time spaa that info off to declude. Kevin Bilbee > -Original Message- > From:

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Whitelisting our Domain

: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Whitelisting our DomainSomeone reported recently that WHITELIST AUTH won't yet work with SmarterMail because it isn't sharing that information in a format that Declude can use, but apparently they are considering adding it to their next major vers

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Whitelisting our Domain

eclude.JunkMail@declude.com > Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Whitelisting our Domain > > > Being in Florida, we use gators. We tried the usual pigeons > initially, but > they got eaten by the gators. Some of the messages actually still made it > to the intended destination as th

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Whitelisting our Domain

Ok, I see Matt chimed in to let us know that CPHZ and SmarterTools are still working on getting WHITELIST AUTH to work. Darin. - Original Message - From: "Darin Cox" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Tuesday, April 05, 2005 5:34 PM Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Whiteli

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Whitelisting our Domain

info on to Declude. Hopefully someone at CPHZ will chime in on this to verify that WHITELIST AUTH does work with SmarterMail. Darin. - Original Message - From: "Imail Admin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Tuesday, April 05, 2005 5:10 PM Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMai

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Whitelisting our Domain

L PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Imail Admin Sent: Tuesday, April 05, 2005 5:10 PM To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Whitelisting our Domain Alright guys, it was only a typo, no need to get in a huff. If you had looked at Darin's message that I quo

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Whitelisting our Domain

n small slips of paper, tie those to the backs of squirrels, and send those out the door. We tried sending the scraps of paper by US Mail, but that was less reliable. - Original Message - From: "Dan Horne" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Tuesday, April 05, 2005 8:07 AM Subject:

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Whitelisting our Domain

-- From: "Dan Horne" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Tuesday, April 05, 2005 8:07 AM Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Whitelisting our Domain No, it uses MTP, the precursor to SMTP. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dan Geiser Sent:

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Whitelisting our Domain

No, it uses MTP, the precursor to SMTP. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dan Geiser Sent: Tuesday, April 05, 2005 10:35 AM To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Whitelisting our Domain I think it uses STP...The

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Whitelisting our Domain

I think it uses STP...The Racer's Edge. - Original Message - From: "Imail Admin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Monday, April 04, 2005 6:18 PM Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Whitelisting our Domain > Just curious: does SmarterMail use SMTP or so

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Whitelisting our Domain

someone please tell me that this was a joke. - Original Message - From: "Imail Admin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Monday, April 04, 2005 6:18 PM Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Whitelisting our Domain > Just curious: does SmarterMail use SMTP or somethin

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Whitelisting our Domain

TECTED]> To: Sent: Monday, April 04, 2005 10:43 AM Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Whitelisting our Domain I'm using IMail 7.14 and I noticted that in the Declude help page that WHITELIST AUTH only works with V8 and above? Is there any way to do this with V7.14? > Yes. > > If all users

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Whitelisting our Domain

Just curious: does SmarterMail use SMTP or something similar? Ben - Original Message - From: "Darin Cox" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Monday, April 04, 2005 7:39 AM Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Whitelisting our Domain > Yes. > > If all users send thro

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Whitelisting our Domain

10:43 AM Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Whitelisting our Domain I'm using IMail 7.14 and I noticted that in the Declude help page that WHITELIST AUTH only works with V8 and above? Is there any way to do this with V7.14? > Yes. > > If all users send through your server, then use

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Whitelisting our Domain

"David Barker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: > Sent: Monday, April 04, 2005 11:13 AM > Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Whitelisting our Domain > > > It depends on the reason for using WHITELIST AUTH if it is because > outgoing > mail is being marked as spam or held you

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Whitelisting our Domain

amount low. Darin. - Original Message - From: "David Barker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Monday, April 04, 2005 11:13 AM Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Whitelisting our Domain It depends on the reason for using WHITELIST AUTH if it is because outgoing mail is being m

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Whitelisting our Domain

name of your domain David B www.declude.com -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Darin Cox Sent: Monday, April 04, 2005 11:03 AM To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Whitelisting our Domain Oops.. not that I know of

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Whitelisting our Domain

05 10:43 AM Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Whitelisting our Domain I'm using IMail 7.14 and I noticted that in the Declude help page that WHITELIST AUTH only works with V8 and above? Is there any way to do this with V7.14? > Yes. > > If all users send through your server, then use

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Whitelisting our Domain

Yes. If all users send through your server, then use SMTP AUTH on all clients and configure Junkmail to whitelist AUTHing users. If not, but all mail comes in from static IPs, you could use an IP whitelist to bypass for those IPs. Darin. - Original Message - From: "Kevin Stanford" <[E

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Whitelisting our Domain

I'm using IMail 7.14 and I noticted that in the Declude help page that WHITELIST AUTH only works with V8 and above? Is there any way to do this with V7.14? > Yes. > > If all users send through your server, then use SMTP AUTH on all clients > and > configure Junkmail to whitelist AUTHing users.

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Whitelisting Issue

, December 20, 2004 6:17 PM To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Whitelisting Issue Very Nice, Should I add anything to the default.junkmail file? EMERGENCYBYPASS WARN ?? Thanks, Chris Patterson, CCNA Network Engineer Rapid Systems -Original Message- From

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Whitelisting Issue

--- > From: John Tolmachoff (Lists) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, December 20, 2004 6:09 PM > To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com > Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Whitelisting Issue > > That is why whitelisting from or to an e-mail address is very touchy and > dang

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Whitelisting Issue

the usage). Andrew 8) -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Chris Patterson Sent: Monday, December 20, 2004 3:22 PM To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Whitelisting Issue He likes his spam. I am wide open to be

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Whitelisting Issue

Chris Patterson wrote: > Hi all, > > I am having trouble with an issue where spam is getting by showing > whitelisted in the header. Neither the domain or e-mail address that it > is coming from is whitelisted in the global config, nor are they showing > as Auth-user. > > However, one of the re

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Whitelisting Issue

: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Whitelisting Issue That is why whitelisting from or to an e-mail address is very touchy and dangerous. Why is anything for that user configured to be whitelisted? John Tolmachoff Engineer/Consultant/Owner eServices For You > -Origi

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Whitelisting Issue

@declude.com Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Whitelisting Issue Chris: We were having a similar issue- Scott suggested the following: EMERGENCYBYPASS bypasswhitelist 40 2 0 0 So now if the weight passes 40 the whitelist will not work if 2 more people are in the list. You can

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Whitelisting Issue

That is why whitelisting from or to an e-mail address is very touchy and dangerous. Why is anything for that user configured to be whitelisted? John Tolmachoff Engineer/Consultant/Owner eServices For You > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail- > [EMAIL P

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Whitelisting Issue

Chris: We were having a similar issue- Scott suggested the following: EMERGENCYBYPASS bypasswhitelist 40 2 0 0 So now if the weight passes 40 the whitelist will not work if 2 more people are in the list. You can adjust the settings per your environment. Regards, Kami

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Whitelisting a test?

Is there anyway we can whitelist a test? With Declude we can have combination tests and tests that give weight based on a combination of test names.. now I wonder if we can whitelist a test name: Whitelist Testsfailedspamcop :) If we can do this it can help us with whitelisting based on

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Whitelisting IP Addresses

Can you whitelist IP addresses via a file in global.cfg or only inline? You can currently only whitelist IPs in the global.cfg file ("WHITELIST IP 192.0.2.25"). -Scott --- Declude JunkMail: The advanced anti-spam solution for IMail mailservers

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Whitelisting IP Addresses

4:30 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Whitelisting IP Addresses > > > >What I really want to do is WHITELIST these IP addresses for my domain > >only. > > That isn't currently possible. > > Per-user/per-domain whitelisting is avai

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Whitelisting IP Addresses

What I really want to do is WHITELIST these IP addresses for my domain only. That isn't currently possible. Per-user/per-domain whitelisting is available for the return address, but there isn't yet a way to have IP whitelisting on a per-user/per-domain basis.

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Whitelisting issue

If one person has [EMAIL PROTECTED] in the address book it appears that an email sent to this person and many others will be whitelisted for all. Correct. We have a situation that a person receives a lot of news emails and has whitelisted his address. Now anything th

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Whitelisting issue

on 4/16/04 8:39 AM, Kami Razvan wrote: > I know this has been discussed in the past but I am not sure if any solution > is available. > > If one person has [EMAIL PROTECTED] in the address book it appears that an email > sent to this person and many others will be whitelisted for all. > > We hav

  1   2   >