I filed a support ticket with smartertools about the port 587 problem:
[22B-0A663758-9813] No port 587 support = huge gaping flaw in smartermail
They said they might add the 587 SMTP Auth support but not any time in the
near future.
They just don't seem to get that if they aren't supporting an
I've been kind of half following the discussions about declude and
smartermail and I'm hoping I can get an update from some of you.
How is declude working with smartermail now? As I recall, I believe some
folks had some problems? Have they been resolved?
Also, I'm loathe to put declude on the
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kevin Bilbee
Sent: Wednesday, July 27, 2005 2:14 AM
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] How is declude working with smartermail?
Dave Beckstrom wrote
That wont work. They come from
thousands of different IP addresses.
Our mail server is under continual
bombardment all day long every day from these dictionary attacks. I have
blackice set up to automatically block the IP address after 3 attempts at
non-existing email accounts. The IP
I'm looking for some feedback on using declude with smartermail. Is anybody
running that combination?
How is it working and how is the performance?
Have you encountered any problems or shortcomings? Would you recommend
Declude to smartermail administrators?
---
This E-mail came from the
out later this year.
Kevin Bilbee
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Dave Beckstrom
Sent: Wednesday, August 24, 2005 1:00 PM
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude and Smartermail?
I'm
I have some questions about declude with
smartermail.
1) With the imail implementation, if Declude
trapped a valid email you could move the email back into the imail spool and it
would be delivered to the user. Can you do the same with
smartermail? If not, how do you get the
John,
I left a voicemail message for you this morning to call me. Please give me
a call ASAP.
Thanks,
Dave
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John Tolmachoff (Lists)
Sent: Wednesday, August 31, 2005 2:24 PM
To:
This spam came in today. Note that it was scored a weight of 6. Yet it
failed two tests that were supposed to add a weight of 4 and a weight of 7.
Now, I wasn't the best in math but I believe 4 and 7 adds up to 11! There
were no negative weights assigned to account for this.
Any ideas?
PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dave Beckstrom
Sent: Thursday, September 01, 2005 1:27 PM
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] Odd Spam Scoring?
This spam came in today. Note that it was scored a weight of 6. Yet it
failed two tests that were supposed to add a weight
Hi Everyone,
I just purchased declude two days ago. I'm running Declude with message
sniffer on a smartermail server. So far, it is working very well.
The approach that I have been trying to take is to, wherever possible, avoid
creating a custom filter entry to trap a specific email. Below
Does anyone happen to know how Eservice's autothite program validates its
license key against the official host name? Does it compare to an IMAIL
registry key or does it look somewhere else?
I run smartermail and I'm wondering if I add the IMAIL registery keys that
contain the OHN if it wouldn't
Hi everyone,
First I want to thank all of you who responded to my earlier question about
catching the spam that was missed. I adopted some of the suggestions and I
appreciate all of the good advice that was offered. You guys know your
stuff!
I wanted to respond to you all but unfortunately
: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dave Beckstrom
Sent: Thursday, September 01, 2005 10:32 AM
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] EServices Autowhite?
Does anyone happen to know how Eservice's autothite program validates
its
PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dave Beckstrom
Sent: Friday, September 02, 2005 8:46 PM
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude Temp Folder backing up.
Hi everyone,
First I want to thank all of you who responded to my earlier
it today - http://www.invariantsystems.com
- Original Message -
From: Dave Beckstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Sent: Friday, September 02, 2005 10:09 PM
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude Temp Folder backing up.
I have a theory. I found the Declude
I've found a few Declude bugs and other problems when running in the
smartermail environment.
1) Declude leaves directories with names such as 6432144091.vir in the
SPOOL/PROC overflow directory and it NEVER goes back and removes these
directories or cleans them up. I have to manually delete
). It gets delivered, but without any Declude processing messages
in the header.
Original Message
From: Dave Beckstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, September 03, 2005 1:01 PM
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude bugs and problems
: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude bugs and problems with smartermail
Hi Dave,
Probably not... Monday's Labor Day. Easy to forget those little things
called holidays, isn't it? grin
Darin.
- Original Message -
From: Dave Beckstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Sent
rate
significantly
since we'd have to lower those test weights quite a bit.
Darin.
- Original Message -
From: Dave Beckstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Sent: Sunday, September 04, 2005 12:55 AM
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude bugs and problems
Luis,
Thank you so much for your post! When you said that you are running with
HOLD %DATE% with no problems it got me to wondering. If it worked for you,
why not for me? I thought about itthen a light went on...
I opened up the $default$junkmail file and in my editor I turned on the
Has anyone on the list tried the new version of Declude (which runs as a
service) for smartermail? Just wondering if anyone found problems and if I
should hold off on upgrading?
---
[This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus]
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.
We've been having a similar problem with declude and smartermail. We
receive email where the declude headers are showing up and the end of the
body of the email and of course the email is delivered and not blocked.
In the last 2 days we've had hundreds of spams that got through because of
some
David,
I don't know about Gary, but our timing is set at 320 and this did help
significantly. However, it does not totally alleviate the problems. We
still have emails that come through with the Declude headers displaying at
the end of the email message. We also have a few emails that come
I dislike generalizing about anything but I do have to say that people on
AOL are a real pain in the ass.
I have had people tell me that they thought the report as spam icon was
how you delete email.
AOLers will register for my web based discussion forum and they will elect
to receive an email
Is anyone running Delude 3.X on a smartermail installation? Any problems
with it?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of GlobalWeb.net Webmaster
Sent: Wednesday, October 19, 2005 9:58 AM
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
processor 533 with 2 gigs ram.
We run the following AV products, F-prot, AVG, and ClamAV (persistent)
on inbound and outbound. For spam we have Sniffer (persistent), INVuribl
2.7, and the usual spam tests running.
Dave Beckstrom wrote:
Is anyone running Delude 3.X on a smartermail
I swear by simpleDNS. Its inexpensive too. You can
set up a master/slave relationship where you update one DNS server and then the
change is automatically replicated to the secondary DNS server. Im not
talking just zone transfers. For example, In MS DNS you still have to define
your domain
I called smartertools last week to tell them that we needed submission port
587 support in version 3 and that we also need the listserver to have the
ability to put the subscribers email address in the footer so that we can
identify AOLers who report list email as spam.
The guy on the phone
Matt,
SMTP Auth on port 587 is exactly why I
called them last week.
I recommend that everyone email [EMAIL PROTECTED] requesting
support of submission port 587 in version 3.0 of smartermail. The only way its
going to happen is if they perceive a huge demand for it.
setup port 587 now. The problem is
that it can not be forced toauth only. So you should ask them to add the
auth only feature to the alternat port.
Kevin Bilbee
-Original
Message-
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dave Beckstrom
Sent: Sunday
:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of Dave Beckstrom
Sent: Monday, October 31, 2005
7:24 AM
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail]
Declude with SmarterMail 3.0
Kevin,
Most of us know that you can set up an
alternate port. The problem is, as you recapped, that it needs be a true
Message-
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of Dave Beckstrom
Sent: Monday, October 31, 2005
8:58 AM
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail]
Declude with SmarterMail 3.0
Kevin,
I didnt post verbatim to this list
what I sent to smartertools. I
We're receiving spam where the Ad graphic states its QuoteAMinute.com but
the domain referenced in the link is one of the following:
lainsnow.com
laquickquotes.com
lahealthinstogo.com
lahotquotes.com
lahealthsite.com
The mail is failing sniffer but apparently not failing invURIBL. Its
scoring
This is a re-send. I didn't see it make it on the list.
We're receiving spam where the Ad graphic states its QuoteAMinute.com but
the domain referenced in the link is one of the following:
lainsnow.com
laquickquotes.com
lahealthinstogo.com
lahotquotes.com
lahealthsite.com
The mail is failing
Scott,
Doesn't Declude support a wild card character for single character matching
in filters? EG, let's say an * is a wild card.
STOPATFIRSTHIT
BODY 0 contains .google.*/url?q
BODY 0 contains .google.**/url?q
BODY 0 contains .google.***/url?q
The above would then accomplish the same thing as
in source
Dave,
There currently is no pattern matching in Declude filters.
David Franco-Rocha
Declude Technical / Engineering
- Original Message -
From: Dave Beckstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Sent: Thursday, November 10, 2005 6:03 PM
Subject: RE
Hi everyone,
I need a bit of assistance. I have a Cold Fusion application that creates
outbound email. I noticed when email from us arrives on my test account on
Yahoo that my in-bound (XINHEADER) Declude headers have been applied.
In other words, we have headers set up such as:
XINHEADER
Dave,
I assume you have to be in an area with
fiber to your building. Im in a residential area with a T-1 in my
house. Its about $800 a month. Id certainly like to find
something faster and less costly. But I doubt anything will be available here
fore a few years.
From:
Hi Guys,
I have a T-1 in my house and I work from a home office in Minnesota. I have
a sales person in New Mexico.
Ideally, I'd like a VOIP service where when someone called me they would get
a message like press 1 for sales, press 2 for Dave. The idea being that it
would route the call either
Thanks for all the VOIP info! A couple of you recommended Nuvio and I'm
going to check into them. One question -- did you purchase from a reseller?
Another way to ask that question is where would I get the best price on the
service?
Thanks!
Dave
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL
: Tuesday, December 13, 2005 12:36 PM
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] WAY OT: COVAD VOIP
Check out www.onebox.com (virtual receptionist). Combine it with vonage.
Rob
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dave Beckstrom
Sent
I'm getting rather irritated with this one. We're getting spam which
contains only one line:
img src=cid:1dd0fa2ddee584b7e4937d9e77a06d69
Is there some way to make a filter where if img src=cid is found on the
first line then set a weight?
No legitimate email should ever contain only the one
Guys,
Why dont all of us who own
smartermail send an email to smartertools asking them to launch a smartertools
discussion list? It will take more than one person requesting it for them to
set it up.
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of
We have one problem with the smartermail and declude combination and I'm
wondering if perhaps the folks at Declude could work with smartertools to
resolve it.
We have Declude set up to NOT add any headers to outbound email. On inbound
email (email sent to us) we add headers such as actual
-Original Message-
Subject: Update: SmarterStats 3.1.2181 Released
This email is to inform you that a new version of SmarterStats has been
released.
Version: 3.1.2181
Released: December 21, 2005
RELEASE NOTES
ADDED: Several more spider/bot definitions were added
ADDED: More
Abend is a common term used
in the world of mainframes. Its the same as aborted
or crashed. I first heard it in 1981 and used it many, many
times over the years. I dont know where the term originated from.
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
I used to read CORE dumps and debug the operating system. I even wrote code
for the operating system (I was a systems programmer)
I don't think you're a real programmer if you don't read binary and assembly
language!!! LOL!!!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Dave, do you have the same compulsion I do, that when you see a binary
string in a movie or tv, you *have* to convert it to hex, octal or decimal
to figure out if there's a joke there for you?
Andrew 8)
Andrew,
No, I guess you must have it worse then I do! *chuckleBut I do laugh at
Title: Message
Andrew,
Yeah.you were probably one of those
guys who gave me a tray of cards (I was an operator for a while) and right
smack in the middle of the stack would be a rubber band. That damn card
reader would munch about 5 cards when it jammed up. If I was in a good mood Id
go
You guys see the problem here, right? We're all getting so damn old nobody
can remember anything for certain LOL!!!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Harvey Rench
Sent: Thursday, December 22, 2005 10:42 AM
To:
Title: Message
I started off on an IBM 370/168 in
1980. The characters on the console were rendered in green print and
looked like they had been hand drawn on the screen. The computer had a
CPU meter on it. The needle would go to 100% utilization and stay there
most of the night. I
We're seeing spam from 198.145.23.1 - 198.145.23.254
This link will show you some of the other domains they're using.
http://www.senderbase.org/search?searchBy=organizationsearchString=Universi
ty%20of%20Portland
Funny thing is the IPs are supposed to belong to the university of Portland.
database, last updated 2006-01-03 19:10
At 03:13 PM 1/4/2006 -0600, Dave Beckstrom wrote:
We're seeing spam from 198.145.23.1 - 198.145.23.254
This link will show you some of the other domains they're using.
http://www.senderbase.org/search?searchBy=organizationsearchString=Univers
i
ty%20of
I was wondering what the status is on the spam review tool for smartermail
users?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kevin Bilbee
Sent: Tuesday, December 06, 2005 12:22 AM
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Subject:
I received a spam email, which was an HTML email with only one line. The
line is as follows:
img src=cid:85ae9b8e79a2548912c0c40ef7709a27
I have a body filter with the following:
BODY 2 BEGINSWITH img src=cid:
The filter didn't trip on the spam email. Any idea of
Fisher
Sent: Monday, January 16, 2006 10:36 AM
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Help with filter
There is probably some html coding before that line.
- Original Message -
From: Dave Beckstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Sent
:
http://www.mail-archive.com/declude.junkmail@declude.com/msg27075.html
Erik
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dave Beckstrom
Sent: Monday, January 16, 2006 4:03 PM
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail
. Another thing
Scott brought up is that this spam campaign also fails the CMDSPACE in
Declude. We make use of that combo test TESTSFAILED when looking for
the
CID tag.
Erik
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dave Beckstrom
Sent: Monday
I would also like to use domain keys through Declude if possible.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Marc Catuogno
Sent: Wednesday, January 18, 2006 11:07 AM
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Subject:
Were getting
the same. Also using Declude with smartermail. Because Declude doesnt
appear to be scanning the headers there is no way for us to stop them.
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Evans Martin
Sent: Tuesday, February 28, 2006
12:38 AM
allowed to be delivered. Smart coding on the spammer...
Not so smart on Declude.
-Erik
-Original Message-
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dave Beckstrom
Sent: Tuesday, February 28, 2006
6:41 PM
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED
Dave,
I'm shopping T-1s right now too. I need a bonded pair. How far will you be
from your POP?
My current ISP quoted me $1,400.00 for the pair, but I'm getting quotes from
about $750 - $1,090.00 from other providers. My ISP says their cost just
for the local loop is about $1,000.00 for the
Providers
About 2-3 miles, I think. Who are you using now?
I just got a quote of $1062 from XO, so the $800 from Speakeasy is looking
pretty good right now.
-d
- Original Message -
From: Dave Beckstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Sent: Friday, March 03
What is your distance to the pop?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Wolf Tombe
Sent: Friday, March 03, 2006 6:10 PM
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: T1 Providers
I've been using
John,
Declude is an incomplete product without a solution to identifying false
positives in the spam folders.
Some folks route spam to an email address that the admin reviews, but that
is a violation of privacy and not a direction we care to go. Moreover,
there is no means to forward the
John,
Actually, your understanding of the history of Declude is what is lacking.
I have had direct dialogue with the new owners of Declude and I was asked
not to share information on this list. So before you start suggesting that
I'm speaking out of turn you should know that you don't have all
There is a big difference between the history of a software product and
current projects for it. While you may claim to have information about a
current project, actual or otherwise, your lack of understanding of the
history of Declude and its products is indeed lacking, though by no means
The problem is that someone using your IP was using a Java program to
access our site. It isn't clear exactly what the intent was (in may
have just been a browser written in Java, for example). But recently we
had to come down hard on abuse of our site, and now have to block very
quickly
Router
VWIC2-2MFT-T1/E1 2 port T1 Card
If you can help me out, please shoot me a price. My email is
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thanks,
Dave Beckstrom
Sixthweb, Inc.
---
[This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus]
---
This E-mail came from
Jay,
We have not upgraded our Declude or Smartermail yet. We were waiting for
any bugs in the new releases to be worked out. Have you encountered any
bugs or problems with the software? Would you say it's safe for us to
upgrade now?
Thanks,
Dave
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL
We use Simple DNS and I cannot recommend it highly enough. One of the
really great features of Simple DNS is that it supports a Master/Slave
relationship between the primary and secondary DNS server. If I create a
new zone in the Primary DNS server simple DNS will detect it and
automatically
We're getting an annoying amount of Viagra spam which currently contain a
link to one of these two sites:
lanseislan.com
cessofanne.com
Both domains resolve to 61.233.42.4 which is owned by CHINA RAILWAY
TELECOMMUNICATIONS CENTER
The source of the spam is coming from IPs in Italy and
I've been receiving some strange spam today on various email addresses of
ours. Its almost like they are profiling various addresses to see if they
are working.
The from and to addresses are the same email address and they are valid
addresses on our domain. However, it appears they are forging
We're getting hundreds of those. The image has a constant pattern starting
with R0lGODdh1
Is there a way to make a filter that would look at the data comprising the
image? I'd like to delete filter based on that.
Here is a snippet:
Content-Type: image/gif;
name=jizuxed.gif
I thought I'd take advantage of the expertise on this list to get some
opinions on Domain Keys / DKIM. Is it something that we should implement?
There is a plug-in for Smartermail available that will add the domain keys
information to email that we send out.
My interest in domains keys is
PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dave
Beckstrom
Sent: Thursday, June 29, 2006 03:16 PM
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: Domain Keys -- Yes or No?
I thought I'd take advantage of the expertise on this list to get some
opinions on Domain Keys / DKIM. Is it something
David,
What is the status on fixing the broken image spam problem?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David
Barker
Sent: Friday, July 07, 2006 9:42 AM
To: Declude.Virus@declude.com; Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Subject:
Note this message's subject line:
Gay listingis that a new porn filer? LOL
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Will
Sent: Friday, July 07, 2006 10:59 AM
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] Gaylisting
I sent an email to F-Prot telling
them that I am not renewing because of their price change. They replied back
basically saying they didnt care and audios.
They are going to lose a lot of
customers. I guess they would rather not have a little money from a lot of
customers instead of no
(4562) x112
http://globalweb.net
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
On Behalf Of Dave Beckstrom
Sent: Monday, July 17, 2006 2:22
PM
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail]
F-Prot Licensing
I sent an email to F-Prot telling
them that I
Email only makes money for spammers. Declude and the other mail tools are
an expense not a revenue generator. Adding CommTouch just adds to overhead
without generating any revenue.
I'm glad its an option and doesn't affect the rest of Declude. Declude is
already at the upper limit of what
With that said, as an add-on in the same regard as things like Sniffer,
CommTouch might be a good solution (if it performs well) for those that
can pay the $195/year, however it still irks me that after two years and
lots of promises, these things are being added at an extra expense and
not
David,
What is happening that a fix for the broken image spam is never forthcoming?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David
Barker
Sent: Wednesday, July 26, 2006 8:10 AM
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com; declude.virus@declude.com
My message sniffer is up for annual renewal.
Commtouch is over 50% less expensive than message sniffer ($445 vs $195)
I have to choose between the more expensive message sniffer renewal or
trying commtouch. I was wondering if anyone here has tried both products
and if so which of the two
I see about 10 - 20 per day where Declude is broken and where it doesn't
scan the email and puts the Declude headers at the bottom.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kevin
Bilbee
Sent: Monday, September 04, 2006 10:10 PM
To:
Still no fix for the broken image spam?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David
Barker
Sent: Friday, September 15, 2006 7:59 AM
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com; declude.virus@declude.com
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] 4.3.x and 3.1.x
I run Blackice Server on the mail server. It drops the connecting IP if we
receive more than a user specified number of attempts for non-existent email
addresses within a user specified time limit. It then blocks that IP for a
user specified amount of time before removing the block.
It prevents
price I find is $300.
G.Z.
- Original Message -
From: Dave Beckstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Sent: Wednesday, September 20, 2006 1:08 PM
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Spam Spike
I run Blackice Server on the mail server. It drops the connecting IP
Im leaving town
in a little bit and I wont be back until Sunday. If someone
reminds me on Sunday or Monday Id be happy to post the settings.
Are we able to post
attachments to this list?
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
On Behalf Of Mike Wiegers
Sent:
Chris,
Will Declude be repackaging the install with the defaults set to mimic the old
behavior?
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of chris
Sent: Friday, September 29, 2006
9:29 AM
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail]
How are you guys blocking something like the spam below?
There is no URL to block on. They keep bastardizing words in the body of
the email to the point where you can't hardly block based on the content.
What do you guys do with these?
-Original Message-
From: Louis Rubin
?
Darin.
- Original Message -
From: Dave Beckstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Sent: Wednesday, October 04, 2006 11:42 PM
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] Blocking these?
How are you guys blocking something like the spam below?
There is no URL to block
would use an older rulebase.
Note that running an old rulebase will mean much of this rapidly changing
spam will get through.
Headers would help...
Darin.
- Original Message -
From: Dave Beckstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Sent: Thursday, October 05
and get your
company
to reimburse you next month and send them a check for the 12 months and
it's
done. I'd hate to think what's getting though without some sort of added
filter
like sniffer.
John
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Dave
Chris,
According to Decludes
web site, any business that provides email to customers cant use
commtouch. That pretty well rules out most of the people on this list.
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of chris
Sent: Thursday, October 12, 2006
9:11 AM
You guys should have made a deal with Pete instead of CommTouch. Sniffer
blows it out of the water and he has no licensing restrictions. IMO of
course.
Matt
Matt,
They should have made a deal with Pete and done it so as to keep the cost
down. At $295 a year it wasn't priced
Yesterday I took a snapshot of the SMTP connections active on our server. I
then did a reverse IP to find out where they were from.
Below are the results. You can see someone from Thailand had 5 SMTP
connections active and Spain had 4. You can also see that only 3 of the IPS
connected were for
: www.123marbella.com
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dave
Beckstrom
Sent: Thursday, October 12, 2006 11:24 PM
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] Interesting SMTP connection patterns
Yesterday I took
---
Check out http://www.invariantsystems.com for utilities for Declude,
Imail,
mxGuard, and ORF. IMail/Declude Overflow Queue Monitoring, SURBL/URI
integration, MRTG Integration, and Log Parsers.
Dave Beckstrom writes:
Yesterday I took a snapshot
1 - 100 of 180 matches
Mail list logo
