I've been doing some testing lately on this. We're getting ready to go
live with our FreeBSD postfix-and-friends replacement for Imail/Declude
this weekend, and I've been doing some testing on the accuracy of
Spamassassin/ClamAV in comparison to Declude. I've got our gateway set
to always bcc 2
That X-Mailer line is configurable via a cfmail
parameter.
cfmail
to ="recipient"
from = "sender"
subject = "msg_subject"
...
mailerid = "Roll Your Own Mail Server
v1.01"
...
At least it is in
CF6.1.
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Susan
DuncanSent:
Mine must have gotten caught in spam...
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John T (Lists)
Sent: Friday, February 03, 2006 4:28 PM
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Ping 2-3-06
What?
Message, what message?
You should also prefix custom header names with X-,
eg: X-CustomHeaderName: %TESTNAME%... Etc
Matt wrote on Wednesday, January 04, 2006 11:35 PM:
These are the text records returned from the blacklist. It might
also be Declude inserting the full lookup in the place of a text
record
Can you forward to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Goran Jovanovic
Sent: Friday, December 09, 2005 5:38 PM
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] OT Alias redirection in IMAIL
Hi,
I am using
Sorry, just saw the other responses on this question.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Goran Jovanovic
Sent: Friday, December 09, 2005 5:38 PM
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] OT Alias redirection in IMAIL
Hi,
The declude.cfg goes like this
Try putting it in the global.cfg. The declude.cfg is for Declude system
settings, not test definitions. (Unless that was a typo, in which case,
you already know this).
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude EVA www.declude.com]
---
This E-mail
Travis Sullivan wrote on Friday, November 18, 2005 1:05 PM:
WEIGHT10 weight x x 16 0
WEIGHT20 weight x x 20 0
That is what I have at the bottom of mine... 16 is my hold weight, 20
is delete. What do I use for outgoing mail actions?
That is a test definition. After that, you also
nothing to do with
Imail's SMTP service and whether it requires auth.
Dan Horne
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail. The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.
Yes, we justtoday reverted back to 1.82 because our
single-processor machine backed up. At the worst there was an hour delay
in delivery. I specifically denoted it was a single-processor machine just
to indicate that our problems would not be related to the multi-processor sleep
problems.
3.0.3. Mail has backed up repeatedly since installing
this version. We originally installed 3.0 when it was released, but
quickly backed off that when the service stopped on its own, leaving multiple
files in the proc directory. After waiting a while, we got an email about
3.0.3 being
Yes I am running Hijack.
In response to Matt's post, the services were not restarted
anywhere near the time that the messages came through. It came in,
according to the headers I posted in the OP, at 2:14 AM. The Decludeproc
service shut down on its own around 3:45 AM. The server didn't
No they weren't held by hijack. The only ones that
were held by hijack that day were a bunch of messages to Declude notifying them
that it had been installed. I still don't know why it needed to send so
many messages to them about that. There were 40-something in the hold2,
which means it
per minute slow, if that. Declude 1.82 goes through
messages much faster, in my experience monitoring (for instance) the
overflow directory.
Dan Horne
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe
David Barker wrote on Tuesday, August 30, 2005 10:42 AM:
Thanks for the feedback.
I have posted decludeproc.exe 3.0.12 which should take care of the
issue of decludeproc stopping on its own.
Also remember you can increase the number of THREADS in your
declude.cfg, the default is 5 you
.
TIA, Dan Horne
Microsoft Mail Internet Headers Version 2.0
Received: from mail.taisweb.net ([68.118.153.2]) by ex1.wilcoxent.net
with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.211);
Tue, 30 Aug 2005 02:14:33 -0400
Received: from SMTP32-FWD by mail.taisweb.net
(SMTP32) id AF94805BC95AB; Tue, 30
Dan Horne wrote on Tuesday, August 30, 2005 8:57 AM:
I received ...
Just wanted to let everyone know that this problem occurred and this
message was sent before I found out about the service stopping
(discussed in another thread). However, that doesn't seem to be related
to this message
Installed on mail.taisweb.net. They
were all from IP address 127.0.0.1. I did an allowip for that in order
to let them go, but what is up with the massive amount of emails,
Declude guys? And why is your own software blocking it?
Dan Horne
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list
Declude finished it?
John T
eServices For You
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dan Horne
Sent: Tuesday, August 30, 2005 10:30 AM
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Problem
that line in in the first place, and easily rectified, but is this
change in behavior intended? For my money, ALL tests INCLUDING
whitelisting should not be run on IPBYPASS'ed IP's. Those IP's should
be ignored completely.
Dan Horne
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list
Heimir Eidskrem wrote on Tuesday, August 23, 2005 12:32 AM:
I just noticed that it was posted June 5.
Whats the deal?
2.5 months later and no update?
Bring back Scott please.
This is not good enough.
You're not the only one that has gotten fed up with the post-Scott
Declude. When
valid user requests per day, BlackIce on itsown was taking up too much
of the server's resources. We tried tuning the settings etc, but ended
uphaving to remove itfrom the server because it, like Imail itself,
just couldn't keep up with the barrage.
Dan Horne
Now we had twice as much email that was junk.
It wasn't Imgate
It was Imail and Declude.
That was exactly our experience as well. Setting up a secondary mx
using Imail is the very reason our server got so overloaded and we had
to implement IMGate.
---
This E-mail came from the
ARE a HGE number of
these, a gateway is the answer.
Dan Horne
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
MattSent: Friday, July 29, 2005 2:12 PMTo:
Declude.JunkMail@declude.comSubject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude
Woes
Michael,Just to cl
SERVFAIL means that the domain does exist and the root name servers have
information on this domain, but that the authoritative name servers are
not answering queries for this domain.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David Sullivan
Sent:
Because it is an alias, there is no "local mailbox
delivery". It never gets rules fired, because you can't set rules on
aliases.
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Darin
CoxSent: Thursday, June 23, 2005 3:39 PMTo:
I personally wouldn't touch imail1.exe, as it is used for
postmaster notifications and the like. I don't know if or when the rules
come into effect on that one. And if you absolutely MUST have Imail rules,
then you are probably currently doing it the only way you can, since the rules
are
The closing is a red herring. It has been that way for a LONG time
and only affects logging. I remember asking about it last year or the
year before when we were having some kind of problems.
Dan Horne
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
That's just not true. My server has been rock-solid since I updated to
8.2HF1. Keep in mind that you're reading a support list where people
post their problems. You don't see any My server is still running
fine posts because people report only problems here. I would venture
to guess that the
um, there are 2 X-Declude-Tests lines. One of them is
proably added by the sender (likely the whitelisted line). Note that there
are also 2 X-Declude-Spoolname lines with different
spoolnames.
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Susan
DuncanSent:
It likely means that the sender also uses Declude and scans
outgoing email.
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Susan
DuncanSent: Monday, June 06, 2005 3:05 PMTo:
Declude.JunkMail@declude.comSubject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail]
whitelisted but not
Title: This always confuses me..sorry
If the user has a junkmail file, the settings from that
file will be used regardless of any other junkmail files. In this case the
action would be IGNORE.
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Sharyn
SchmidtSent:
According to Bill Billman at Declude, you probably want to wait on 8.2
if you're using Declude with it. From the Virus list:
We have uncovered an intermittent issue with Declude and IMail 8.2.
Basically, system resources are consumed until the system will no longer
run. I want you to know that
at
Ipswitch and both were extremely helpful in diagnosing this problem.
Thank you both very much.
Dan Horne
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John Tolmachoff
(Lists)
Sent: Wednesday, June 01, 2005 2:53 PM
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
teway, since I don't want to
turn Hijack off.
BTW, I worked with Ralph Krausse at Declude and with Eric Shanbrom at
Ipswitch and both were extremely helpful in diagnosing this problem.
Thank you both very much.
Dan Horne
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PRO
I have received a couple of messages in the last two days in my inbox
that were NOT scanned by Declude. I thought the headers below were
strange, since they seem to have MIME segments in them. However,
another message in my inbox that was spam (below my hold weight) also
has similar MIME
I have received a couple of messages in the last two days in my inbox
that were NOT scanned by Declude. I thought the headers below were
strange, since they seem to have MIME segments in them. However,
another message in my inbox that was spam (below my hold weight) also
has similar MIME
I believe that the installer in part ignores the location you choose
during manual install and drops some files into a default location
(C:\Program Files\Computerized Horizons).
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Darrell
([EMAIL PROTECTED])
From the manual:
6.10 Test Definitions
Tests are defined in the \{MAILSERVER}\Declude\global.cfg file. The
format of a test definition is the name of the test, followed by the test type,
followed by two test-specific pieces of information, followed by two weights:
The weight that will be
"rdeliver
ReceivingDomain.com"
Yep, that means it was delivered
successfully.
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Goran
JovanovicSent: Tuesday, May 17, 2005 12:26 AMTo:
Declude.JunkMail@declude.comSubject: [Declude.JunkMail] Thoughts on
why
http://catb.org/~esr/jargon/html/J/joe-job.html
http://members.cox.net/joejob/
http://searchcio.techtarget.com/sDefinition/0,,sid19_gci917469,00.html
http://www.everything2.com/index.pl?node=Joe%20Job
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Emails containing banned extensions and (I believe) vulnerabilities will
not be deleted using DELETEVIRUS ON. It is best to use a script of some
sort as a scheduled task to remove files older than x days from the
virus directory.
Dan Horne
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED
reason (customer has dynamic IP's), or you need the
HELO to change you need to add the domain (and users) to your Imail
config. I am not positive about this last point, but I believe that for
the HELO to change, the domain cannot be a virtual but must have an IP
address.
Dan Horne
-Original
I believe you could change that warn action to either COPYTO or COPYFILE
depending on individual preferences and it will do what the OP wants.
Question to the list: Is this a better way to handle this type of thing
than Imail rules? For instance, using Imail rules to copy incoming and
outgoing
PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dan Horne
Sent: Wednesday, May 11, 2005 2:02 PM
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] COPYALL setup
I believe you could change that warn action to either COPYTO or COPYFILE
depending on individual preferences and it will do what the OP wants
From the manual you referenced:
The format of a test definition is the name of the test, followed by
the test type, followed by two test-specific pieces of information,
followed by two weights: The weight that will be assigned to the test if
an E-mail fails the test, and the weight that will be
looking for a way to get clamav integrated into postfix without
adding these extra headers, but that is not for this forum. Someone on
the IMGate list suggested I IPBYPASS 127.0.0.1. This would solve the
problem, but will it cause any other issues?
Thanks,
Dan Horne
---
This E-mail came from
I upgraded yesterday to Imail 8.2 and so far the phones
aren't ringing off the hooks. No reported problems from any of our
users. I've tailed the logs and they all seem normal. I am running
Declude Junkmail Pro/Virus Standard/Hijack 2.0.6.
Dan Horne
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED
of these that are just above our hold weight and
I'd like to have a specific filter for this to pump it above the delete
weight.
Thanks,
Dan Horne
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe
it, but it is the best.
Dan Horne
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Sanford
Whiteman
Sent: Saturday, April 23, 2005 3:12 AM
To: Bill Green dfn Systems
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Off Topic - Content Filter Suggestions
We may be taking
Title: Message
He said they are included in the BODY of the email, not the
headers.
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Andy
SchmidtSent: Wednesday, April 13, 2005 10:02 AMTo:
Declude.JunkMail@declude.comSubject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail]
Something
Why is IPURL listed as Currently N/A ? Not Applicable? To what?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kami Razvan
Sent: Tuesday, April 12, 2005 4:14 PM
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] DYNHELO Test
(at the time).
Best Regards
Andy Schmidt
Phone: +1 201 934-3414 x20 (Business)
Fax:+1 201 934-9206
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dan Horne
Sent: Tuesday, April 12, 2005 05:09 PM
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Subject: RE
).
-Dan Horne
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail. The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.
Thanks to all who replied. We have decided to remove that line from the
headers and use the spoolname instead. More work for us, but the
customers are happy.
-Dan Horne
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Darin Cox
Sent: Friday, April 08
Nick, you bugged my office! There's no other way you could have been
privy to the exact conversation my boss had to (not with) me.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Nick
Sent: Friday, April 08, 2005 11:59 AM
To:
Is there a list of the available variables in version 2? The manual
doesn't list LOCALRECIPS or REALRECIPS and I was wondering if there is a
comprehensive list somewhere else that I'm missing.
-Dan
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail
No, it uses MTP, the precursor to SMTP.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dan Geiser
Sent: Tuesday, April 05, 2005 10:35 AM
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Whitelisting our Domain
I think it uses STP...The
of squirrels, and send those out the door. We tried sending the
scraps of paper by US Mail, but that was less reliable.
- Original Message -
From: Dan Horne [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Sent: Tuesday, April 05, 2005 8:07 AM
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Whitelisting our
This is also my experience. Spam has dropped off radically since
December.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Scott Fisher
Sent: Friday, April 01, 2005 11:47 AM
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Subject: Re: Re[2]: [Declude.JunkMail] Huge
The main problem with the old system were the users that whined about
the lack of documentation in the interims and the lack of notification
of new interims. I am glad I don't have to sift through those posts
anymore or see Scott for the thousandth time post that the interims are
not meant for
Sniffer will be your best test. Without a doubt.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Joe Raykiewicz
Sent: Monday, March 21, 2005 8:54 PM
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] filter files
Thanks to both of you. I
be automated? Does anyone
currently do something along these lines? If not, how do you handle
this issue?
Thanks, Dan Horne
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail. The archives can
I've done a lot of research into this area, demoing most of the windows
packages out there, and I like Helm from Webhostautomation the best. It
has its quirks (at the time I tested it, over a year ago, a new user
couldn't choose their own username I think), but it controls everything
(including
are all seemingly from the
postmaster at Kevin's domain. But those don't affect the usability of
the program. Thanks again, Kevin.
Dan Horne
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kevin Bilbee
Sent: Monday, March 14, 2005 3:20 PM
To: Declude.JunkMail
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Dan Horne
Sent: Tuesday, March 15, 2005 12:34 PM
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Automated requeuing
FYI to the list, I have got Kevin's hold analyzer set up on my system
now
it sends
contains a list of all that user's held emails, along with a link for
each one that will re-queue the email somehow.
If anyone can provide sample scripts and/or a how-to, I'd be much
appreciative.
Thanks,
Dan Horne
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http
.
- Original Message -
From: Dan Horne [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Sent: Monday, March 14, 2005 2:22 PM
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] Automated requeuing
I know from reading the list that some of you have set up your own
automated systems that notify your users of held messages
.
- Original Message -
From: Dan Horne [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Sent: Monday, March 14, 2005 2:22 PM
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] Automated requeuing
I know from reading the list that some of you have set up your own
automated systems that notify your users of held
Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Dan Horne
Sent: Monday, March 14, 2005 11:23 AM
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] Automated requeuing
I know from reading the list that some of you have set up your own
automated systems
, but I'm talking about the HOLD
action. So another question for Declude is this: Will the
configurable parameter you are adding affect the HOLD action as well?
Will it solve my problem?
Thanks
Dan Horne
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]
---
This E
From the manual:
6.4 DNS Server
By default, Declude JunkMail uses the same DNS server that {MAILSERVER}
uses. If you want to use a different DNS server, you need a line in the
configuration filestarting with DNS, followed by the IP of your DNS
server. For example, DNS 198.6.1.2.
-Original
I believe that Imail doesn't keep a retry timer per message, but
instead simply attempts to process every message in the queue at each
queue run, which is every 30 min by default. If the T line equals the
retry limit it creates a postmaster message and deletes the message.
-Original
So it looks like BOTH Imail (via trusted addresses) and
Declude (via Autowhitelist) were whitelisting this
message.
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Darin
CoxSent: Friday, February 25, 2005 9:32 AMTo:
Declude.JunkMail@declude.comSubject: Re:
Websense here. We had a year-long project last year to try and find a
replacement for Websense, cause management didn't like the price. After
a year of testing everything under the sun, we came back to Websense as
the best of the breed. The licensing costs are not even that expensive
when you
DNS? I saw this when the DNS server my Imail was querying started
having problems. Try using a different dns server.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Serge
Sent: Saturday, February 12, 2005 7:48 AM
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
I received 2 online pharmacy spams to my inbox (log snips and headers
attached). One came in Saturday night at ~9:11, the other ~9:36. They
were queued, then on Sunday at 3:32 AM, they were both delivered. They
were never scanned by Declude.
I'm trying to figure out what happened. First of
OK, but the shutdown doesn't happen until 3:00 AM. These messages were
received (and queued, which is the point they SHOULD have been handed
off to Declude) at 9:30 PM. That's a 6 hour window between receipt and
delivery.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL
I posted this to the IMGate list last week to a similar request:
I use this batch file on my Imail server to create the file, then ftp it
over to my IMGate box, scheduled once per hour. It requires unxutils.
Start syncIMGate.bat---
rem Make sure we're in the right directory.
m:
cd
FWIW, we use the Sniffer tests in this way. We assign 2/3 our hold weight
to SNIFFER nonzero, then if it also fails the porn, scams, malware tests it
gets the other third.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of R. Scott Perry
Sent: Monday,
I moved from 1.81 to 1.82 this morning and I am not seeing any extra cpu
load, so it doesn't seem to be universal.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dan Geiser
Sent: Tuesday, January 04, 2005 10:35 AM
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
LOL
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
MattSent: Wednesday, December 08, 2004 4:01 PMTo:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] OT:
Declude Config Files...anyone in the holiday giving mood?
D N
JO T
U G
SY - TO
HU O
C
(less than 30K/day) with a dual 2.4
Xeon w/ HT enabled, gig RAM, SCSI 15Krpm drives, separate physical mirrors
for system/mailboxes/spool, defragged daily. I mean we aren't even pushing
this thing yet.
Dan Horne
Web Services Administrator
TAIS Web
Wilcox World Travel Tours
[EMAIL PROTECTED
Note, however, that if this was at the beginning of the day
No, it was 5:00pm.
How does this time compare to the IMail log file times?
There is no delay between Imail's processing line and Declude's first
entry for the email, and the whole thing scanned through Declude in less
than a second.
: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dan Horne
Sent: Friday, November 19, 2004 12:09 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Blackice
Thanks for the tip, but I never took it off of Trusted. Still, I will test
that and see.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL
and the
same behavior (this time it didn't take 20 minutes, either, it was almost
instantaneous on boot).
Dan Horne
Web Services Administrator
TAIS Web
Wilcox World Travel Tours
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE:
This email message, including any
Declude.exe. 4 instances said 25% each, and the rest of the many Declude
processes were at 0.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of R. Scott Perry
Sent: Friday, November 19, 2004 11:45 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail]
Oh, yeah, and blackice was way down the list showing 0%.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of R. Scott Perry
Sent: Friday, November 19, 2004 11:45 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Blackice
Is anyone here running both
] Blackice
Could be a DNS issue. Make sure that you can perform DNS lookups from that
box since you've set your settings to paranoid in BI.
Jason
- Original Message -
From: Dan Horne [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, November 19, 2004 10:36 AM
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail
MAILFROM 10 CONTAINS ?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Paul Fuhrmeister
Sent: Wednesday, November 17, 2004 9:58 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] if there's a ? in the X-Declude-Sender
Here's the X-Declude-Sender in a
FWIW, that second link is a story on WhatsUp Pro, not ICS.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Wolf Tombe
Sent: Wednesday, October 27, 2004 4:17 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude and Ipswitch ICS
A goggle
ooh ooh me too me too
_
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Keith Johnson
Sent: Monday, September 20, 2004 9:50 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Whitelister / Blacklister
Would love to have a look at it. Thanks for the offer.
Keith
I'm curious about this test. If I am a user and I am
unable to receive an email from the person I would like to whitelist, how can I
attach a message from that person? Does this work with messages from
Declude's ATTACH action? Should the ATTACH message be forwarded inline
withthe original
Does Declude's ALLRECIPS variable include the BCC recips?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of R. Scott Perry
Sent: Tuesday, September 21, 2004 3:19 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] D files with no Q
Thanks
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of R. Scott Perry
Sent: Tuesday, September 21, 2004 5:02 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] ALLRECIPS question
Does Declude's ALLRECIPS variable include the BCC recips?
Yes.
?
Dan Horne
Web Services Administrator
TAIS Web
Wilcox World Travel Tours
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE:
This email message, including any attachments, is for the sole use of the
intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential
Ah, thanks Scott and Serge.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of R. Scott Perry
Sent: Monday, August 09, 2004 10:36 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] SPF for virtuals?
If I have one IP-ful domain (the primary domain of
from the
first character in the subject?
Dan Horne
Web Services Administrator
TAIS Web
Wilcox World Travel Tours
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE:
This email message, including any attachments, is for the sole use of the
intended
to download its updates from LiveUpdate instead of from a parent
server.
HTH, and YMMV
Dan Horne
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of R. Scott Perry
Sent: Friday, July 09, 2004 7:15 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Error in log
information about Declude users via the signup
mechanism.
-Dan Horne
1 - 100 of 135 matches
Mail list logo
