: [Declude.JunkMail] Catching SPAM when the sender = recipient
|
|
| I have noticed that many spammers in recent months have begun
| to use the recipients email as the senders email.
|
| Can this be trapped by the current tests or should I request
| a new test to cover this?
|
| The only
ck
ArgoNet, Inc.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:Declude.JunkMail-owner@;declude.com]On Behalf Of Mike
Sent: Friday, October 25, 2002 12:09 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Catching SPAM when the sender =
recipient
> himself ALL the time, as well as his wif
> himself ALL the time, as well as his wife in the same room. I don't know
why
> people can't look into the "sent" box.
Because if you use IMAP and Outlook express, and send from one machine, the
mail won't appear in the "sent" folder on another machine.
Maybe I'm a weirdo or something, but I se
r left TO blank, so I don't know.
Glenn Z.
- Original Message -
From:
Trent M. Davenport
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, October 25, 2002 11:37
AM
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Catching
SPAM when the sender = recipient
I normally bcc everyone w
om> (
[EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:trent.davenport@;whtvcable.com> )
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:Declude.JunkMail-owner@;declude.com]On Behalf Of paul
Sent: October 25, 2002 9:14 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Catching SPAM when th
MAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, October 25, 2002 11:06 AM
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Catching SPAM when the sender = recipient
> >Be careful if you do this...
> >
> >A lot of people actually send messages to others as BCC and then put
> >them
>Have these people never heard of the "sent items" folder?
What about when I am working at a client and check my e-mail via web mail?
If I have to respond to something, I would want a copy of it in my sent mail
in my Outlook, so I BCC myself and when I get back to the office, I move the
"copy" i
f Of John Tolmachoff
Sent: Friday, October 25, 2002 10:06 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Catching SPAM when the sender =
recipient
>Be careful if you do this...
>
>A lot of people actually send messages to others as BCC and then put
>themselves in To in orde
CTED]
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Catching SPAM when the sender =
recipient
>Be careful if you do this...
>
>A lot of people actually send messages to others as BCC and then put
>themselves in To in order to make sure it has gone out.
>
>We see a lot of that.
I too see t
>Be careful if you do this...
>
>A lot of people actually send messages to others as BCC and then put
>themselves in To in order to make sure it has gone out.
>
>We see a lot of that.
I too see that.
One of our largest clients will often send out excess inventory lists to
several people. As tho
Behalf Of Todd Holt
Sent: Friday, October 25, 2002 10:47 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] Catching SPAM when the sender = recipient
I have noticed that many spammers in recent months have begun to use the
recipients email as the senders email.
Can this be trapped by the current
I have noticed that many spammers in recent months have begun to use the
recipients email as the senders email.
Yes, I've commented on it twice today. :)
Can this be trapped by the current tests or should I request a new test to
cover this?
The only legitimate mail that would pass this test
I have noticed that many spammers in recent months have begun to use the
recipients email as the senders email.
Can this be trapped by the current tests or should I request a new test to
cover this?
The only legitimate mail that would pass this test would be users sending
mail to themselves and f
13 matches
Mail list logo
