I recognize this bug is too vague, but I wanted to get something into
the system so we can start investigating it. If I knew what "fast
enough" was, then perhaps we could have a measure to close it.
If you were to ask me, "fast enough" is no more than 3 seconds with the
default configuration.
Tools Guide does not document how to start ij with derbyrun.jar
---
Key: DERBY-1662
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1662
Project: Derby
Issue Type: Bug
Com
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1663?page=comments#action_12427305 ]
David Van Couvering commented on DERBY-1663:
smfcmd.mf:
Manifest-Version: 1.0^M
Ant-Version: Apache Ant 1.5.4 ^M
Created-By: 1.4.2_06-b03 (Sun Microsys
Appreciated it if someone can find some time to review DERBY-1652.Yip
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1664?page=comments#action_12427303 ]
Daniel John Debrunner commented on DERBY-1664:
--
Might be good to separate this out into:
1) driver load time
2) database create time
3) database open
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1664?page=comments#action_12427300 ]
Daniel John Debrunner commented on DERBY-1664:
--
It may be part a store issue, but it's others as well. Some of the startup time
is due to the number o
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1655?page=all ]
Laura Stewart updated DERBY-1655:
-
Attachment: derby1655_tuning.diff
derby1655_tuning_html.zip
Attaching the doc updates for the Tuning Guide.
Please review and comment if these
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1660?page=all ]
Mike Matrigali updated DERBY-1660:
--
committed the one line change to the trunk:
m1_142:103>svn commit
Sendingjava\engine\org\apache\derby\catalog\SystemProcedures.java
Transmitting file d
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1315?page=all ]
Kathey Marsden updated DERBY-1315:
--
Fix Version/s: 10.2.0.0
> Statement optimization/compilation fails with OutOfMemoryException in
> largeCodeGen test with embedded and framework DerbyNetCl
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1652?page=comments#action_12427297 ]
Yip Ng commented on DERBY-1652:
---
False alarm. Renabling patch available.
> Update trigger updating the same rows as the original update does not throw
> an excep
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1664?page=comments#action_12427298 ]
David Van Couvering commented on DERBY-1664:
And this followup thread from Andrew:
http://www.nabble.com/Re%3A-Startup-time-for-Derby-tf2043724.html#a5
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1664?page=comments#action_12427296 ]
David Van Couvering commented on DERBY-1664:
Also this mail thread on derby-user is helpful
http://www.nabble.com/Startup-time-for-Derby-tf2012733.html
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1633?page=all ]
Kathey Marsden updated DERBY-1633:
--
Fix Version/s: 10.2.0.0
Marking fix version 10.2
> Regression: The fields of views are not being calculated properly since
> 10.1.2.4
> ---
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1516?page=comments#action_12427294 ]
Craig Russell commented on DERBY-1516:
--
Hi David,
>From my comments 31-Jul-2006:
> I did not update master/DerbyNet/blobclob4BLOB.out canon because this cano
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1663?page=comments#action_12427292 ]
Andrew McIntyre commented on DERBY-1663:
I can't reproduce this error. Check the contents of the *.mf files in
jars/sane/lists/smfcmd.mf. Since this error
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1652?page=all ]
Yip Ng updated DERBY-1652:
--
Derby Info: [Patch Available, Existing Application Impact, Release Note
Needed] (was: [Release Note Needed, Existing Application Impact])
> Update trigger updating the sa
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1057?page=comments#action_12427289 ]
Deepa Remesh commented on DERBY-1057:
-
Thanks Laura for addressing my comments. I looked at the updated html file
"rtunpropersqlauth.html" for tuning guide and
Derby startup time is too slow
--
Key: DERBY-1664
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1664
Project: Derby
Issue Type: Bug
Reporter: David Van Couvering
Fix For: 10.2.0.0
I kn
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1664?page=all ]
David Van Couvering updated DERBY-1664:
---
Component/s: Store
> Derby startup time is too slow
> --
>
> Key: DERBY-1664
> URL: ht
This is the procedure I was expecting (except expected to have to
merge myself it i wanted something in branch), sounds good to me.
I was going to be ok with holding up the branch for the code
rototil if necessary, that seemed like a reasonable delay for
solving an apache mandate. Having
a real b
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1661?page=all ]
Sunitha Kambhampati updated DERBY-1661:
---
Attachment: derby1661.diff.txt
1661_Notes.txt
1661_PerfResults.xls
I am attaching a patch derby1661.diff.txt to fi
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1661?page=all ]
Sunitha Kambhampati updated DERBY-1661:
---
Fix Version/s: 10.2.0.0
Derby Info: [Patch Available]
> Create index on large tables fails with too many open files ,
> FileNotFoundExcept
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1663?page=all ]
David Van Couvering updated DERBY-1663:
---
Component/s: Tools
> java -jar derbyrun.jar ij gets "Duplicate name in Manifest: Class-Path"
> ---
java -jar derbyrun.jar ij gets "Duplicate name in Manifest: Class-Path"
---
Key: DERBY-1663
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1663
Project: Derby
Issue Type: B
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1662?page=all ]
Andrew McIntyre updated DERBY-1662:
---
Summary: Document derbyrun.jar (was: Tools Guide does not document how to
start ij with derbyrun.jar)
The only documentation that mentions derbyrun.jar
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1641?page=all ]
Kathey Marsden updated DERBY-1641:
--
Fix Version/s: 10.2.0.0
Priority: Critical (was: Major)
I verified this on 10.2 and verified that I still get the conglomerate does not
exist err
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1655?page=all ]
Laura Stewart updated DERBY-1655:
-
Attachment: ctoolsimport27052.html
derby1655_tools_html.diff
Attached updates to the Tools and Utilities Guide.
One file was updated.
Please
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1655?page=comments#action_12427280 ]
Laura Stewart commented on DERBY-1655:
--
I added the attachements for the Dev Guide. Please review and commit if the
updates are
ready to be committed.
> Doc
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1655?page=all ]
Attachment: derby1655_devguide.diff
derby1655_devguide_html.zip
> Document XML functionality for 10.2
> ---
>
> Key: DERBY-1655
> URL: http://issu
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1033?page=comments#action_12427279 ]
Daniel John Debrunner commented on DERBY-1033:
--
Note that this bug was not for an index for the documentation set, but instead
an obvious starting poi
On 8/10/06, Mike Matrigali <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Just to make it clear, derby does not support any version of a "nested"transaction which one could commit but then subsequently rollback aspart of the original transaction. All "nested" transactions provided
by store are committed independentl
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1033?page=comments#action_12427278 ]
Andrew McIntyre commented on DERBY-1033:
I'll look into it. DITA upgrades require a little bit of adjustment to the
build files but overall usually aren't
Rick Hillegas wrote:
> Thanks to everyone for thinking through the issues here. This has been
> very helpful. I don't understand the practical advantages of a copy
> versus a branch, particularly since I will have to create a branch
> eventually. I could use some more education here. What would be
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1033?page=comments#action_12427276 ]
Laura Stewart commented on DERBY-1033:
--
Andrew - I believe that the new DITA Open Source Toolkit (version 1.3) adds
substantial support for indexes.
Can Derby
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1582?page=comments#action_12427272 ]
Deepa Remesh commented on DERBY-1582:
-
Thanks Satheesh for clarifying that we cannot revoke privileges from the
database owner.
I was reworking the patch and
Kathey Marsden wrote:
Do we need a formal vote?
I think that we should probably have a formal vote now on the wording
and at least get formal +1 votes from a few committers. If later there
are changes to the code that make the note about the existing code not
necessary, then that code ch
On 8/10/06, Rick Hillegas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Thanks to everyone for thinking through the issues here. This has been
very helpful. I don't understand the practical advantages of a copy
versus a branch, particularly since I will have to create a branch
eventually. I could use some more educ
If we can assume that nobody will be checking in fixes to the beta
branch, and that therefore the "mega-merge" is a one-way operation with
no manual conflicts to deal with, then I think this approach makes sense.
Thanks,
David
Rick Hillegas wrote:
Thanks to everyone for thinking through the i
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-688?page=all ]
A B updated DERBY-688:
--
Attachment: d688_phase4_v2.patch
Attaching a second version of the phase 4 patch that corrects the test failure
reported by Bryan. The real reason I had the EXPORT commands in the
Rick Hillegas wrote:
What would be the objections to the following scheme? A big advantage
to this scheme is that it's something I can wrap my mind around:
[snip scheme to create a branch, mass merge fixes when required, and
then adopt individual fix merge approach]
+1
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1422?page=all ]
Jean T. Anderson closed DERBY-1422.
---
> Derby web site source needs headers that comply with new ASF policy
> ---
>
>
Create index on large tables fails with too many open files ,
FileNotFoundException.
Key: DERBY-1661
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1661
Project: De
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1422?page=all ]
Jean T. Anderson resolved DERBY-1422.
-
Resolution: Fixed
Source header changes committed, revision 429820.
Also, in this cleanup I spotted that the copyright, notice, and license files
th
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-790?page=all ]
Francois Orsini updated DERBY-790:
--
Fix Version/s: 10.2.0.0
Affects Version/s: 10.1.1.0
> SQLException used by the networked interface to Derby is not serializable
> ---
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1660?page=all ]
Sunitha Kambhampati updated DERBY-1660:
---
Derby Info: [Patch Available]
> SYSCS_BULK_INSERT fails with syntax error at PROPERTIES clause.
>
Just to make it clear, derby does not support any version of a "nested"
transaction which one could commit but then subsequently rollback as
part of the original transaction. All "nested" transactions provided
by store are committed independently of the parent transaction. These
transactions ar
Thanks to everyone for thinking through the issues here. This has been
very helpful. I don't understand the practical advantages of a copy
versus a branch, particularly since I will have to create a branch
eventually. I could use some more education here. What would be the
objections to the fol
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1660?page=all ]
Sunitha Kambhampati updated DERBY-1660:
---
Attachment: bulkinsert.diff.txt
I am attaching the patch bulkinsert.diff.txt to fix this issue.
This patch
-- fixes the sql query used in the SY
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1516?page=comments#action_12427263 ]
David Van Couvering commented on DERBY-1516:
Hi, Craig. I merged your patch into my sandbox and ran derbyall, and I'm sorry
to say I had a test failure
Laura Stewart (JIRA) wrote:
> [ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1057?page=all ]
>
> Laura Stewart updated DERBY-1057:
> -
>
> Attachment: derby1057_tuning4.diff
> rtunpropersqlauth.html
>
> Attached the patch and updated html fi
SYSCS_BULK_INSERT fails with syntax error at PROPERTIES clause.
---
Key: DERBY-1660
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1660
Project: Derby
Issue Type: Bug
Com
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1057?page=all ]
Laura Stewart updated DERBY-1057:
-
Attachment: derby1057_tuning4.diff
rtunpropersqlauth.html
Attached the patch and updated html file for the Tuning Guide, based on
comments fr
David Van Couvering wrote:
OK, missed that, thanks.
Thank YOU for actually reading the docs :) I'm glad there's interest in the new
behavior, and I wish had the documentation completed by now for early feedback.
But alas, things to do, things to do...
Thanks again,
Army
OK, missed that, thanks.
David
A B (JIRA) wrote:
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1655?page=comments#action_12427256 ]
A B commented on DERBY-1655:
The documentation so far provides some very high-level descriptoin of what you
use XML
Hi Deepa -
Responses below.
On 8/9/06, Deepa Remesh (JIRA) wrote:
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1057?page=comments#action_12427035 ]
Deepa Remesh commented on DERBY-1057:
-
Hi Laura, I only went through the updates in tuning guide. Pleas
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1655?page=comments#action_12427256 ]
A B commented on DERBY-1655:
> The documentation so far provides some very high-level descriptoin of what
> you
> use XMLSERIALIZE and XMLPARSE for (although it is no
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1547?page=all ]
V.Narayanan updated DERBY-1547:
---
Attachment: DERBY-1547_v1.diff
DERBY-1547_v1.stat
Hi,
Attached are the patches for this issue. I HAVE NOT run derbyall on the whole
patch as yet
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-790?page=comments#action_12427253 ]
Francois Orsini commented on DERBY-790:
---
Sorry for missing the queries earlier - missed them in my emails somehow.
I have a fix for this issue. I have added s
I haven't had a chance to test these, but I would love to see these go
into the bin distribution.
I think a README in the frameworks directory is a good thing to do, as
well as a release note, as well as updating the docs. No harm in saying
it multiple times in multiple ways. We should also
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1655?page=comments#action_12427252 ]
David Van Couvering commented on DERBY-1655:
Hi, I've read the docs and I have a couple of comments. Since I'm a complete
newbie to SQL/XML hopefully
Issue Subscription
Filter: Derby: JIRA issues with patch available (18 issues)
Subscriber: derby-dev
Key Summary
DERBY-688 Enhancements to XML functionality to move toward XPath/XQuery
support...
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-688
DERBY-1473 Add cut-off and tru
Andrew McIntyre wrote:
So, the first one is more of what traditionally would be called a tag,
except that it has one extra change in it than what is in the trunk -
the change to make it report as beta. The second one is what more
traditionally is called a branch.
In svn, everything is a copy, i
On 8/10/06, Kathey Marsden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Andrew McIntyre wrote:
> I think there's some confusion over the fact that in svn, copy ==
> branch (== tag).
>
Yes. I was confused by that. So the proposal is just for two branches.
One now for beta and then another one later for th 10.2
Andrew McIntyre wrote:
I think there's some confusion over the fact that in svn, copy ==
branch (== tag).
Yes. I was confused by that. So the proposal is just for two branches.
One now for beta and then another one later for th 10.2 branch. Is
that correct?
Kathey
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-688?page=comments#action_12427249 ]
A B commented on DERBY-688:
---
Thanks for continuing to review the patches, Bryan. The whole security thing
with the "xmlexport.del" file did occur to me, but when I ran t
On 8/10/06, Daniel John Debrunner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'm getting (more?) confused now. I thought that the approach Andrew
brought up of the svn copy, followed by modifying the beta bit in that
branch would leave a svn history with a unique svn revision number. I
was assuming the flip the
Thanks for the kind words. Hope I can continue to be useful.
Kim
Jean T. Anderson wrote On 08/09/06 19:30,:
> Laura Stewart wrote:
>
>>Updates look good to me.
>>+1
>>
>
>
> Indeed they do, and I committed the change, revision 430186.
>
> Thanks for the contribution, Kim! We really appreciate
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1456?page=comments#action_12427245 ]
Kathey Marsden commented on DERBY-1456:
---
I am merging this change to 10.1
To verify reverse merged the code change for DERBY-1454 and ran the new
derbynet/
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1248?page=all ]
Mike Matrigali resolved DERBY-1248.
---
Fix Version/s: 10.2.0.0
Resolution: Fixed
committed fix to trunk:
m3_142:80>svn commit
Sendingjava\engine\org\apache\derby\impl\store\raw\
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1438?page=all ]
Olav Sandstaa closed DERBY-1438.
I have verified that SQLException.toString() writes the same text in both
network client and embedded driver.
Thanks for fixing this, David!
> Text written by S
Kathey Marsden wrote:
> Andrew McIntyre wrote:
>
>> On 8/9/06, Kathey Marsden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> Is there any impact to having a milestone event like beta 10.2 not
>>> recorded in our svn history?
>>
>>
>> If the beta reports as being at a revision that is modified
>> from what
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1554?page=all ]
Kathey Marsden closed DERBY-1554.
-
> IDENTITY_VAL_LOCAL() returned value is modified incorrectly by a multi-row
> INSERT statement.
> --
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1554?page=all ]
Kathey Marsden resolved DERBY-1554.
---
Fix Version/s: 10.1.3.2
Resolution: Fixed
Fixed in 10.1.3.2
Date: Thu Aug 10 06:43:20 2006
New Revision: 430381
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1554?page=all ]
Kathey Marsden reopened DERBY-1554:
---
> IDENTITY_VAL_LOCAL() returned value is modified incorrectly by a multi-row
> INSERT statement.
>
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-353?page=all ]
Kathey Marsden closed DERBY-353.
> It is desirable to have IDENTITY_VAL_LOCAL() function return last recent user
> specified value or system generated value for BY DEFAULT identity columns.
> -
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-353?page=all ]
Kathey Marsden resolved DERBY-353.
--
Resolution: Fixed
> It is desirable to have IDENTITY_VAL_LOCAL() function return last recent user
> specified value or system generated value for BY DEFAULT
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-353?page=all ]
Kathey Marsden updated DERBY-353:
-
Fix Version/s: 10.1.3.2
Fixed in 10.1.3.2
Date: Thu Aug 10 06:43:20 2006
New Revision: 430381
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=430381&view=rev
Log:
DERB
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-353?page=all ]
Kathey Marsden reopened DERBY-353:
--
reopen to fix fix version
> It is desirable to have IDENTITY_VAL_LOCAL() function return last recent user
> specified value or system generated va
Kathey Marsden wrote:
Just FYI, I think there is something not quite right with network
server's interaction with firewall software or maybe , where one can
get a hang even though the software is set to allow connections.
Should have said:
Just FYI, I think there is something not quite
Ole Solberg wrote:
I recently had some problems running some tests on a machine due to
overaggressive firewall software on that machine. Considering that
these mails involve tests running on different operating systems
presumably running on different machines, and that a lot of them
involve acc
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1473?page=comments#action_12427201 ]
Kristian Waagan commented on DERBY-1473:
Posting the results from my final derbyall runs for the patches 1a and 2a
combined:
* Solaris 10 (x86)
JDK 1.3 :
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1554?page=all ]
Rick Hillegas closed DERBY-1554.
Resolution: Fixed
> IDENTITY_VAL_LOCAL() returned value is modified incorrectly by a multi-row
> INSERT statement.
> --
Andrew McIntyre wrote:
On 8/9/06, Kathey Marsden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Is there any impact to having a milestone event like beta 10.2 not
recorded in our svn history?
If the beta reports as being at a revision that is modified
from what's in svn, then that's a little suspect. What rea
Andrew McIntyre wrote:
Failures in these tests have been arriving ever since these test
results started being sent to this list. Synapses connected with
regard to a recent problem I had running tests on a specific machine.
So, I'm wondering...
On 8/10/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wr
On 8/9/06, Kathey Marsden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Is there any impact to having a milestone event like beta 10.2 not
recorded in our svn history?
Yes, and its a matter of confidence as to what a 'beta 10.2' that is
broadcasted far-and-wide actually represents. The beta code, built
through
Failures in these tests have been arriving ever since these test
results started being sent to this list. Synapses connected with
regard to a recent problem I had running tests on a specific machine.
So, I'm wondering...
On 8/10/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[Auto-generated ma
[Auto-generated mail]
*Derby* 430109/2006-08-09 20:29:30 CEST
*derbyall*
Failed TestsOK Skip Duration Platform
---
*Jvm: 1.6*
0734734 0 108.01% SunOS-5.10_i86pc-i386
Details in
http://www.multinet.no/~s
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1487?page=comments#action_12427147 ]
Andrew McIntyre commented on DERBY-1487:
I haven't had much time to work on this issue, but the security docs say this
about java.io.FilePermission:
"Note
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-935?page=all ]
Andrew McIntyre updated DERBY-935:
--
Fix Version/s: 10.2.0.0
Marking 10.2.0.0, this should be rather simple. The logo images need to be
added to the doc tree and then a few edits made to build
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1033?page=comments#action_12427142 ]
Andrew McIntyre commented on DERBY-1033:
Typo, in combination with DERBY-1405.
> Provide easy ways to find the documentation starting points from a Derby
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1033?page=all ]
Andrew McIntyre updated DERBY-1033:
---
Fix Version/s: 10.2.0.0
We need a top-level index.html, which I plan to deal with in combination with
DERBY-1045.
> Provide easy ways to find the docume
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1593?page=all ]
Andrew McIntyre updated DERBY-1593:
---
Fix Version/s: 10.2.0.0
Low hanging fruit for 10.2.
> Separate test jar files from the "product" jars in a distribution
> ---
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1597?page=all ]
Andrew McIntyre updated DERBY-1597:
---
Fix Version/s: 10.2.0.0
Derby Info: [Patch Available]
Marking 10.2.0.0, patch is available, minor edits needed before commit.
> Scripts in framewo
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-744?page=all ]
Andrew McIntyre updated DERBY-744:
--
Fix Version/s: 10.2.2.0
(was: 10.2.0.0)
Not an urgent issue, moving this out 10.2.2.0.
> Problem setting sanity state to false by usi
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1650?page=all ]
Andrew McIntyre updated DERBY-1650:
---
Fix Version/s: 10.2.2.0
(was: 10.2.0.0)
Not an urgent issue, moving this out to 10.2.2.
> derbytools.jar needs org.apache.derby.ia
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1032?page=comments#action_12427135 ]
Andrew McIntyre commented on DERBY-1032:
I would love to hear some feedback on the latest patch for this. Do we want to
deprecate the frameworks scripts an
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1470?page=all ]
Andrew McIntyre resolved DERBY-1470.
Resolution: Fixed
Derby Info: (was: [Patch Available])
Committed -alt4 patch with revision 430301.
> Correct instructions in demo html file demo\
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1164?page=all ]
Andrew McIntyre resolved DERBY-1164.
Resolution: Fixed
Derby Info: (was: [Patch Available])
Committed 1164_5 patch with revision 430177.
> 'show tables' and 'describe' commands in ij
101 - 198 of 198 matches
Mail list logo