On 13.01.2017 23:11, Michael Siepmann wrote:
> On 01/13/2017 03:02 PM, Aaron Wolf wrote:
>> One extra thought about this process:
>>
>> Although I'll aim to make audio that could stay as final, if the work on
>> the visuals somehow calls for minor tweaks in the script, it's not
>> absolutely set
On 13.01.2017 22:48, J.wuensch wrote:
> Guys, no need to start fighting here. The introduction video is a very
> important part of the snowdrift launch. We all know that, and I think we all
> agree, that Aron as a co-founder of the snowdrift project should have some
> influence on it.
> @ Aron
On 01/13/2017 03:02 PM, Aaron Wolf wrote:
> One extra thought about this process:
>
> Although I'll aim to make audio that could stay as final, if the work on
> the visuals somehow calls for minor tweaks in the script, it's not
> absolutely set in stone. It's final now, and I hope to not change it,
One extra thought about this process:
Although I'll aim to make audio that could stay as final, if the work on
the visuals somehow calls for minor tweaks in the script, it's not
absolutely set in stone. It's final now, and I hope to not change it,
but it's not literally impossible, of course.
s
; Sent from ProtonMail <https://protonmail.ch>, encrypted email based in
> Switzerland.
>
>
>> Original Message
>> Subject: Re: [Snowdrift-design] new video script draft
>> Local Time: January 13, 2017 9:17 PM
>> UTC Time: January 13, 20
Switzerland.
Original Message ----
Subject: Re: [Snowdrift-design] new video script draft
Local Time: January 13, 2017 9:17 PM
UTC Time: January 13, 2017 8:17 PM
From: m...@mray.de
To: design@lists.snowdrift.coop
On 13.01.2017 18:31, Aaron Wolf wrote:
> On 01/13/2017 01:53 AM,
On 13.01.2017 18:31, Aaron Wolf wrote:
> On 01/13/2017 01:53 AM, mray wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 11.01.2017 21:22, Aaron Wolf wrote:
>>> On 01/11/2017 11:57 AM, mray wrote:
On 11.01.2017 17:21, Aaron Wolf wrote:
>
> I already started a new thread to discuss the story-boarding. Do w
On 13.01.2017 19:11, Stephen Michel wrote:
> Snipping wildly to respond to one specific thing.
>
> On Fri, Jan 13, 2017 at 4:53 AM, mray wrote:
>> I expect to work on this inside the design circle and seek
>> acceptance/feedback when there are results to talk about.
>
> For the record, there i
Snipping wildly to respond to one specific thing.
On Fri, Jan 13, 2017 at 4:53 AM, mray wrote:
I expect to work on this inside the design circle and seek
acceptance/feedback when there are results to talk about.
For the record, there is no design *circle*, since circles are
organized around
On 01/13/2017 01:53 AM, mray wrote:
>
>
> On 11.01.2017 21:22, Aaron Wolf wrote:
>> On 01/11/2017 11:57 AM, mray wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On 11.01.2017 17:21, Aaron Wolf wrote:
I already started a new thread to discuss the story-boarding. Do we
really need the audio files before starting
On 11.01.2017 21:22, Aaron Wolf wrote:
> On 01/11/2017 11:57 AM, mray wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 11.01.2017 17:21, Aaron Wolf wrote:
>>>
>>> I already started a new thread to discuss the story-boarding. Do we
>>> really need the audio files before starting that storyboarding process?
>>>
>>
>> Yes.
>>
>
On 01/12/2017 02:12 AM, J.wuensch wrote:
> @Aron
> I would prefer to work with the audio because I think I would rather go
> for an animatic than a classic storyboard. An animatic is a video where
> there are no final shots, but just rough animation together with the sound.
>
> Btw, you said you a
ple is a short where me and my brother were in the position of
VFX supervising and lead compositing:
https://vimeo.com/35796070 and the breakdown: https://vimeo.com/36291888
Johannes
Original Message ----
Subject: Re: [Snowdrift-design] new video script draft
Local Time: Jan
On 01/11/2017 11:57 AM, mray wrote:
>
>
> On 11.01.2017 17:21, Aaron Wolf wrote:
>>
>> I already started a new thread to discuss the story-boarding. Do we
>> really need the audio files before starting that storyboarding process?
>>
>
> Yes.
>
Please forgive my ignorance here. Can you explain
On 11.01.2017 17:21, Aaron Wolf wrote:
>
> I already started a new thread to discuss the story-boarding. Do we
> really need the audio files before starting that storyboarding process?
>
Yes.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
__
On 01/11/2017 03:34 AM, mray wrote:
>
> On 11.01.2017 11:51, J.wuensch wrote:
>> Hello Mray,
>>
>> I'm also looking forward to work with you on the video soon. My twin
>> brother, who worked on some VFX projects, too, would like to join the video
>> team, if possible.
>> Would we then be three p
On 11.01.2017 11:51, J.wuensch wrote:
> Hello Mray,
>
> I'm also looking forward to work with you on the video soon. My twin brother,
> who worked on some VFX projects, too, would like to join the video team, if
> possible.
> Would we then be three people? Or are there others interested in work
when you have the audio files. Then we can meet on
jitsi or irc and discuss the details and begin with storyboarding/animatic
etc...
Johannes
Sent from [ProtonMail](https://protonmail.ch), encrypted email based in
Switzerland.
Original Message
Subject: Re: [Snowdrift-design
On 09.01.2017 18:41, J.wuensch wrote:
> Hey guys,
> All in all it's pretty good! But there is one thing I noticed when I read the
> text to other people. It's the "site-wide" budget in part 7 that seems to be
> a bit confusing.
>
> 7. And your pledges stay active as long as they fit within you
il, encrypted email based in Switzerland.
---- Original Message
Subject: Re: [Snowdrift-design] new video script draft
Local Time: 9. Januar 2017 7:31 PM
UTC Time: 9. Januar 2017 18:31
From: aa...@snowdrift.coop
To: design@lists.snowdrift.coop
On 01/09/2017 09:41 AM, J.wuensch wrot
e: [Snowdrift-design] new video script draft
Local Time: 9. Januar 2017 7:31 PM
UTC Time: 9. Januar 2017 18:31
From: aa...@snowdrift.coop
To: design@lists.snowdrift.coop
On 01/09/2017 09:41 AM, J.wuensch wrote:
> Hey guys,
> All in all it's pretty good! But there is one thing I noticed
On 01/09/2017 09:41 AM, J.wuensch wrote:
> Hey guys,
> All in all it's pretty good! But there is one thing I noticed when I
> read the text to other people. It's the "site-wide" budget in part 7
> that seems to be a bit confusing.
>
> 7. And your pledges stay active as long as they fit within your
mention it again.
Sent from [ProtonMail](https://protonmail.ch), encrypted email based in
Switzerland.
Original Message
Subject: Re: [Snowdrift-design] new video script draft
Local Time: 9. Januar 2017 3:50 AM
UTC Time: 9. Januar 2017 02:50
From: stephen.mic...@tufts.edu
On Sat, Jan 7, 2017 at 11:56 PM, Aaron Wolf
wrote:
We're getting close!! We need to work on the last pre-sign-off line(s)
to solidify this thing.
I'm happy to suggest as a final draft for everything except the
second-to-last section.
SCRIPT:
1. Things like software, music, journalism, and res
We're getting close!! We need to work on the last pre-sign-off line(s)
to solidify this thing.
I'm happy to suggest as a final draft for everything except the
second-to-last section.
SCRIPT:
1. Things like software, music, journalism, and research *can* be public
goods, freely used and shared by
I should clarify that the thing we now have that I like is the latest
update:
```
Things like software, music, movies, journalism, and research *can* be
public goods, freely used and shared by *everyone*.
But instead, publishers typically add restrictions in order to secure
funding. Meanwhile, pr
On 12/26/2016 01:49 PM, mray wrote:
> I attach an older recording (2016-12-05) of the script.
> I'd like to not work on this the "e-mail" way if possible and hope there
> will be another meeting I can finally attend (sorry for missing the last
> ones!).
>
> All in all I like the older one much bet
On Sat, Dec 24, 2016 at 1:10 PM, Aaron Wolf
wrote:
On 12/23/2016 10:31 PM, Stephen Michel wrote:
Additional thought: As we go through this, we need to think of what
illustration we are going to pair with each segment.
I'm not actually sure if we should do this coincidentally or
sequentially
On 12/24/2016 10:10 AM, Aaron Wolf wrote:
> Our innovative crowd*matching* system provides a new way to provide
> significant funding for public goods at little individual cost.
"provides a way to provide" ugh. I wrote too fast.
anyone else take a stab at wordsmithing this one line?
signature
On 12/23/2016 10:31 PM, Stephen Michel wrote:
> Additional thought: As we go through this, we need to think of what
> illustration we are going to pair with each segment.
>
I'm not actually sure if we should do this coincidentally or
sequentially, but I see some arguments both ways. I did have so
On Sat, Dec 24, 2016 at 1:31 AM, Stephen Michel
wrote:
> Our innovative crowd*matching* system empowers you to join with
> others in supporting the public goods *you* care about, creating
> significant impact at little individual cost.
* Shorter, and doesn't lose anything important that I can t
PREFACE: I agree with nearly everything you said; If I didn't
explicitly disagree, consider me agreed.
On Fri, Dec 23, 2016 at 4:38 PM, Aaron Wolf
wrote:
```
NEW SCRIPT:
Things like software, music, movies, journalism, and research *can* be
public goods, freely used and shared by *everyone*
So, we lost some work when an etherpad expired. It had a few sentences I
particularly liked, but it didn't finish out the script with the right
emphasis. I've rewritten the script considering all the concerns that
have come up in this process. First, I'll share the new script here, and
then I'll ad
33 matches
Mail list logo
