On Tue, 2021-06-15 at 14:58 +0500, Alexander Mikhaylenko via desktop-
devel-list wrote:
> As far as I know, libgd is pretty much only used for tagged entries
> nowadays. In GTK4 it's a lot easier to implement them in-tree than it
> was in GTK3, gtk4-demo even has an example.
It doesn't take very
On Tue, 2021-06-15 at 12:13 +0200, Felipe Borges wrote:
> Evince bundles the whole libgd just so it can consume a two line cell
> renderer for its icon view. In this case, it might be worth just
> copy-pasting this specific class and drop the libgd dependency.
It never bundled the whole libgd,
On Mon, 2021-06-14 at 18:18 +0200, Andre Klapper via desktop-devel-list
wrote:
> https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/libgd/commits/master hasn't seen changes
> for 30 months. Emails to both maintainer addresses listed in the DOAP
> file ({cosimoc|malureau}@gnome.org) bounced.
Still used:
Hey Robert,
On Sat, 2021-03-13 at 20:52 +0200, Roth Robert via desktop-devel-list
wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> this mail is a bit long overdue, but better late than never:
> libgtop, the library used for "system monitoring" we use in System
> Monitor and Usage is in need of help.
>
> Due to my
On Sat, 2021-02-27 at 10:26 -0800, Philip Chimento via desktop-devel-
list wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 23, 2021 at 5:54 AM Emmanuele Bassi via desktop-devel-list
> wrote:
> > The release team can do "non maintainer" releases, of course; the
> > problem is, of course, that maintainers can be *very*
On Thu, 2021-01-14 at 12:16 +0100, Jonas Ådahl wrote:
>
> FWIW, mutter and gnome-shell (and others too I suspect) only allow
> maintainers to merge to master (due to a lack of better granularity
> in
> the community edition of GitLab), but that is primarily due to us
> using
> marge-bot, so
On Thu, 2021-01-14 at 12:08 +0100, Benjamin Berg wrote:
> On Thu, 2021-01-14 at 12:06 +0100, Bastien Nocera wrote:
> > This is likely a migration problem, as the project was originally
> > in
> > Jonas' personal namespace, right? All the projects under the GNOME
> > nam
On Thu, 2021-01-14 at 11:57 +0100, Benjamin Berg wrote:
> On Wed, 2021-01-13 at 15:57 -0600, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 13, 2021 at 9:28 pm, Philip Withnall
> wrote:
> > Given that you’ve just committed to submitting MRs and waiting for
> > CI
> > to pass, rather than pushing
On Wed, 2021-01-13 at 15:15 -0600, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jan 13, 2021 at 7:53 pm, Bastien Nocera
> wrote:
> > "I need to remember not to [push commits directly to the main
> branch]
> > for your modules, sorry"
>
> I was trying to be
On Wed, 2021-01-13 at 10:06 -0600, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Yesterday, after I committed the typo to Calendar, I promised to use
> merge requests from now on when committing build fixes. Previously, I
> had promised to do this only for your projects, but yesterday I
> forgot,
> and
(I tried to send this to the release-team@ alias/mailing-list, but that
was shuttered last August, so seeing as it would be public on discourse
anyway)
On Tue, 2021-01-12 at 09:31 -0600, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
> Hi developers,
>
> Please remember that action is required when updating your
>
On Tue, 2021-01-12 at 16:50 +, Philip Withnall wrote:
> On Tue, 2021-01-12 at 09:31 -0600, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
> > Hi developers,
> >
> > Please remember that action is required when updating your
> > dependencies
> > or build options. You need to either make sure gnome-build-meta is
>
On Tue, 2019-12-03 at 20:48 -0500, Link Dupont wrote:
> I completely agree with these sentiments. It's a valuable piece of
> software that should not be abandoned. I volunteer to take on
> maintainership of it. I've never been a module owner, but this
> sounds
> like a great opportunity to
On Wed, 2020-07-29 at 10:56 -0500, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
> Hi, this is now fixed.
>
> But somehow, my GitLab notification settings got reset and I've been
> missing mails. Be careful! Check your notification settings for the
> projects you care about.
I filed:
On Mon, 2019-05-06 at 21:13 +0200, Frederic Peters wrote:
> Bastien Nocera wrote:
>
> > - How?
> >
> > It is possible to rename the "master" branch in git. It's also
> > possible
> > to add a "link" of sorts so that software that spec
Doing some thread grave digging.
On Sat, 2019-05-04 at 15:18 +0200, Bastien Nocera wrote:
> On Sat, 2019-05-04 at 12:32 +0200, drago01 via desktop-devel-list
> wrote:
> > https://dictionary.cambridge.org/amp/english/master
> >
> > Master / slave relation is just one
On Fri, 2020-06-12 at 06:49 -0500, Ty Young via desktop-devel-list
wrote:
> Your reply violates the Code of Conduct, IMO, namely be respectful,
> empathetic, considerate, patient and generous and friendly sections
> of
> the community guidelines. If you don't have anything constructive to
> say
On Mon, 2020-02-24 at 08:19 -0600, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 24, 2020 at 10:11 am, Bastien Nocera
> wrote:
> > It uses the flatpak_ci_initiative.yml template and throws this
> > error:
> > bwrap: Creating new namespace failed, likely because the kernel
>
On Wed, 2020-02-19 at 14:50 +0100, Bartłomiej Piotrowski wrote:
> Hello,
>
> For historical reasons™ all GitLab runners were running with
> privileged
> mode enabled. The happy side effect of this fact is that nothing
> special
> was ever needed to run Docker or flatpak builds. It also means we
>
On Tue, 2019-12-03 at 20:48 -0500, Link Dupont wrote:
> I completely agree with these sentiments. It's a valuable piece of
> software that should not be abandoned. I volunteer to take on
> maintainership of it. I've never been a module owner, but this
> sounds
> like a great opportunity to
On Tue, 2019-12-03 at 23:14 +0100, Kevin Degeling wrote:
> Hey All,
>
> After reporting an issue related to Sound Juicer, I discovered that
> the project has been mostly abandoned. There is still a valuable pull
> request open (
> https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/sound-juicer/merge_requests/2) but
On Fri, 2019-09-13 at 10:30 +0100, Emmanuele Bassi wrote:
>
> If a dependency is already in the GNOME SDK then there's no real need
> to notify us; unless, of course, the dependency in the SDK is pinned
> to a specific version, and you require a later one.
>
> As I said in the original email,
On Fri, 2019-09-13 at 10:12 +0100, Emmanuele Bassi via desktop-devel-
list wrote:
> Not every single problem we have in building a complex project like
> GNOME can be solved by a script; if it were, we wouldn't need
> maintainers, and y'all would have been replaced by a script already.
This
On Thu, 2019-09-12 at 08:19 -0500, mcatanz...@gnome.org wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 12, 2019 at 2:45 AM, Milan Crha via desktop-devel-list
> wrote:
> > As a real life example, I skipped 3.32.5 this year, because there
> > was
> > no code change in the stable branch with which the users could
> >
On Tue, 2019-09-03 at 06:42 -0500, mcatanz...@gnome.org wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 17, 2019 at 4:41 PM, mcatanz...@gnome.org wrote:
> > The bug report shows valgrind crashes on startup. I've tried to get
> > a
> > working asan build of Tech Preview, but haven't been successful.
>
> If anyone is
On Fri, 2019-08-16 at 13:49 -0500, mcatanz...@gnome.org wrote:
> I'm a bit confused by this argument, because Monday is only the
> deadline, the last-possible day to release, not a recommended day.
It's the "last-possible day" *therefore* it is the day that most
tarballs will be released.
You
On Tue, 2019-08-06 at 11:23 +0200, Bastien Nocera wrote:
> On Mon, 2019-08-05 at 23:11 +0200, Arnaud Bonatti via desktop-devel-
> list wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > 2019-08-05 22:37 UTC+02:00, mcatanz...@gnome.org <
> > mcatanz...@gnome.org>:
> > > I'm try
On Mon, 2019-08-05 at 23:11 +0200, Arnaud Bonatti via desktop-devel-
list wrote:
> Hi,
>
> 2019-08-05 22:37 UTC+02:00, mcatanz...@gnome.org <
> mcatanz...@gnome.org>:
> > I'm trying to find new maintainers for the following games:
> >
> > four-in-a-row, gnome-klotski, gnome-robots,
On Thu, 2019-08-01 at 16:05 +0200, Bastien Nocera wrote:
> On Thu, 2019-08-01 at 12:21 +0100, Javier Jardón wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > It came to my attention [1] several of the nigthly flatpaks of our
> > core apps stop building against the latest GNOME flatpak run
On Thu, 2019-08-01 at 12:21 +0100, Javier Jardón wrote:
> Hi,
>
> It came to my attention [1] several of the nigthly flatpaks of our
> core apps stop building against the latest GNOME flatpak runtime
>
> Taking a look to the build failures, seems the main problems are:
>
> 1. Some of the
On Wed, 2019-05-08 at 16:05 +0200, jtoj...@gmail.com wrote:
> It does not work very well, though:
>
> https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-control-center/issues/1
It works as well as it possibly can. Those search terms aren't
automatically pulled from the UI, or the documentation, but manually
On Tue, 2019-05-07 at 18:32 +0100, Calum Benson via desktop-devel-list
wrote:
> > On 2 May 2019, at 11:19, jtojnar--- via desktop-devel-list <
> > desktop-devel-list@gnome.org> wrote:
> >
> > Something like full-text search similar to one Firefox has in its
> > preferences might be nicer and
On 4 May 2019, at 17:47, drago01 wrote:
>
> "The term master copy has a unique meaning in art that predates the
> modern term. In art, a master copy is the process of drawing or
> painting a copy of a another artist's work. It is most common to copy
> the work of a master artist, hence the
On Sat, 2019-05-04 at 12:32 +0200, drago01 via desktop-devel-list
wrote:
> https://dictionary.cambridge.org/amp/english/master
>
> Master / slave relation is just one of the possible meanings but not
> in the context of master copy
>
> "an original version of something from which copies can be
On Sat, 2019-05-04 at 01:28 +0200, Matthias Klumpp wrote:
> Am Fr., 3. Mai 2019 um 15:36 Uhr schrieb Carmen Bianca Bakker
> :
> > Je ven, 2019-05-03 je 14:45 +0200, Bastien Nocera skribis:
> > > [...]
> > > If we agree that the "master" in the git branch nam
On Fri, 2019-05-03 at 18:31 -0500, mcatanz...@gnome.org wrote:
> On Fri, May 3, 2019 at 5:57 PM, Bastien Nocera
> wrote:
> > Seriously Michael, you’re embarrassing yourself.
>
> I don't feel very embarrassed. Your suggested alternative name,
> "main,"
> is
> On 4 May 2019, at 00:29, mcatanz...@gnome.org wrote:
>
>> On Fri, May 3, 2019 at 5:09 AM, Bastien Nocera wrote:
>> - And to what?
>> A few possible names were mentioned/used. "mainline" was thought to
>> have strong connections to drug use, "
On Fri, 2019-05-03 at 15:35 +0200, Carmen Bianca Bakker wrote:
> Je ven, 2019-05-03 je 14:45 +0200, Bastien Nocera skribis:
> > >
> > If we agree that the "master" in the git branch name is the same
> > "master" that's used in "master copy
On Fri, 2019-05-03 at 14:07 +0200, Carmen Bianca Bakker wrote:
> Je ven, 2019-05-03 je 12:09 +0200, Bastien Nocera skribis:
> > - Why?
> >
> > For the same reasons we'd want to change master/slave references.
> > Though it usually isn't paired up with "slave"
On Fri, 2019-05-03 at 08:36 +0200, Daniel Mustieles García via desktop-
devel-list wrote:
> The problem is that he is not only writting a summary. He has renamed
> master branch in GitLab, he has noticed people in Ubuntu about this
> change, he has ignored us when we have said his arguments about
On Wed, 2019-05-01 at 12:48 +0100, Richard Hughes via desktop-devel-
list wrote:
> On Wed, 1 May 2019 at 12:38, Michael Gratton wrote:
> > They have also been successful in getting other projects to use
> > more
> > inclusive language. For example, MongoDB initially refused to stop
> > using the
On Thu, 2019-04-25 at 11:46 +1000, Michael Gratton wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'd like to formally propose as a GNOME Goal that GNOME modules
> replace references to the terms "master" and "slave". [...] The scope
> would be to replace occurrences of the terms appearing [...] git
> repositories
I
On Fri, 2019-05-03 at 08:47 +0200, Daniel Mustieles García via desktop-
devel-list wrote:
>
>
> El mié., 1 may. 2019 a las 14:39, Michael Gratton ()
> escribió:
> > On Wed, May 1, 2019 at 14:30, Carmen Bianca Bakker
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > I think the problem is that, when prompted why we
On Wed, 2019-05-01 at 10:08 -0500, mcatanz...@gnome.org wrote:
> On Wed, May 1, 2019 at 6:08 AM, Michael Gratton wrote:
> > This has already been covered in the original proposal under
> > objection (1) "It doesn't matter". As has already been discussed,
> > what actually doesn't matter is what
On Thu, 2019-05-02 at 11:26 +0200, Carmen Bianca Bakker wrote:
> > 2b. No battery percentage on status bar.
>
> Slight agree on all, but do not know how to fix this.
I implemented this:
$ gsettings set org.gnome.desktop.interface show-battery-percentage true
but it doesn't have a UI:
On Tue, 2019-04-30 at 17:53 +0200, Daniel Mustieles García wrote:
> What has happened with this? We have a repo with a non-standard
> branch name and no consensus for a global change, do we?
The repository in question, Geary, has had a git configuration change
applied so that the old branch name
On Sat, 2019-04-27 at 14:13 +0200, Ask Hjorth Larsen via desktop-devel-
list wrote:
>
> This sounds beautiful, but mindless prescriptivism like this won't
> help any of the peoples you mention. Want to help? Donate money
> where it matters. Vote for someone good. Avoid buying smartphones
>
On Thu, 2019-04-25 at 12:41 +0200, David Woodhouse wrote:
> On Thu, 2019-04-25 at 12:12 +0200, Bastien Nocera wrote:
> > It's easier to completely remove "master" to remove mentions of
> > "master/slave" and to remove the non-gender neutral "master" tha
On Thu, 2019-04-25 at 11:33 +0100, Richard Hughes via desktop-devel-
list wrote:
> On Thu, 25 Apr 2019 at 06:21, wrote:
> > This should go without saying, but master branches are not a
> > reference
> > to slavery, rather to canonicity. The master branch is the
> > canonical
> > branch, the
On Thu, 2019-04-25 at 11:58 +0200, David Woodhouse wrote:
> On Thu, 2019-04-25 at 11:45 +0200, Bastien Nocera wrote:
> > You also don't get to call reasoning you don't agree with "bizarre
> > and
> > illogical" without justifying it. The reason behind this possible
&
On Thu, 2019-04-25 at 10:30 +0200, David Woodhouse wrote:
> On Thu, 2019-04-25 at 18:13 +1000, Michael Gratton wrote:
> > On Thu, Apr 25, 2019 at 00:20, mcatanz...@gnome.org wrote:
> > > We should go to reasonable lengths to avoid offending reasonable
> > > people, but if someone is offended by
On Thu, 2019-04-25 at 11:46 +1000, Michael Gratton wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'd like to formally propose as a GNOME Goal that GNOME modules
> replace
> references to the terms "master" and "slave". This is a worthwhile
> thing to do for social inclusiveness[0]. Many FOSS and non-FOSS
> projects,
On Mon, 2019-04-15 at 08:50 +0200, Milan Crha via desktop-devel-list
wrote:
> On Fri, 2019-04-12 at 14:48 +0200, Bastien Nocera wrote:
> > I'm guessing you looked at tarballs rather than git modules.
>
> Hi,
> yeah, sort of, I used Fedora repoquery to chec
On Fri, 2019-04-12 at 08:47 +0200, Milan Crha via desktop-devel-list
wrote:
> Looking into the
> other
> API users, I found these hosted on GNOME:
>
>almanah
>bijiben
>california
>ekiga
>evolution-activesync
>folks
>glabels
>gnome-calendar
>gnome-contacts
>
> On 7 Apr 2019, at 20:50, Christian Hergert wrote:
>
>> On 04/07/2019 04:42 AM, Bastien Nocera wrote:
>> That's going to be a tough ask given the discussion in:
>> https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/libpeas/merge_requests/5
>> TL;DR: The maintainer is AWO
On Sat, 2019-04-06 at 17:54 -0700, Javier Jardón wrote:
> - libpeas https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/libpeas/merge_requests/4
That's going to be a tough ask given the discussion in:
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/libpeas/merge_requests/5
TL;DR: The maintainer is AWOL but doesn't want help. Would
On Sat, 2019-03-23 at 11:06 -0700, Britt Yazel wrote:
> Ladies and Gentlemen,
>
> Congrats on an excellent 3.32 release! As the one handling the front
> facing side of our social media accounts, I can safely say that the
> users are EXTREMELY happy with the changes, both features and
>
ore bugs.)
I'd really rather libraries that sit in between GLib/GTK and the app to
live on GNOME servers.
And this particular bug still needs a release to fix it.
> On Fri, Mar 1, 2019 at 4:06 AM, Bastien Nocera
> wrote:
> > For the release-team:
> > Did the definition and acceptance cr
libhandy broke translation for all applications that used it because of
a call to textdomain()[1].
Make sure your submodule contains at least the commit labelled:
Fix broken translations in all libhandy applications
Would be useful for the libhandy developers to release a new version
ASAP.
For
On Wed, 2019-02-27 at 14:34 +0100, Andre Klapper wrote:
> On Tue, 2019-02-26 at 08:19 +0100, Andre Klapper wrote:
> > Currently GNOME Bugzilla does not show the "Browse" product page
> > when a
> > product has been disabled for new bug entry
>
> Fixed now thanks to the help of Carlos and Olav.
Hey,
15 years ago, in another age, nautilus-sendto was created so that one
could easily send files from nautilus via email. Then via email and
Gaim. Via email, Gaim and Bluetooth. And Gajim. And now Pidgin not
Gaim. And then Empathy and UPnP servers. And then just email again,
because the UI was
On Mon, 2019-02-25 at 21:50 +0100, Marcus Lundblad wrote:
> Hi all!
>
> I wanted to discuss some things around sharing. Currently in Maps we
> have a dialog to share locations with a fixed set of apps, Weather,
> Clocks, and the default browser. There are a couple of problems with
> this. First,
Hey,
Looks like I mentioned my intent to do it, but didn't actually announce
when it was done. gnome-books has been split off:
https://mail.gnome.org/archives/distributor-list/2019-February/msg0.html
This version is also available on Flathub, with WebP support, and many fixes.
Cheers
> On 17 Feb 2019, at 04:04, mcatanz...@gnome.org wrote:
>
>> On Sat, Feb 16, 2019 at 2:57 PM, Nathan Graule via desktop-devel-list
>> wrote:
>> A solution would be for distribution package maintainers to use the
>> binary tarball as a base instead of sources - this way the build can be
>>
> On 17 Feb 2019, at 18:18, Alexandre Franke wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
>> On Mon, Feb 11, 2019 at 4:46 PM Allan Day wrote:
>> The “documents” source type is primarily used by GNOME Documents to
>> access Google Drive. […]
>> GNOME Documents is able to use the “files” source type as an
>> alternative
On Thu, 2019-02-14 at 21:15 +0100, Stefan Sauer wrote:
> On 02/13/2019 10:31 PM, Bastien Nocera wrote:
> > On Wed, 2019-02-13 at 21:58 +0100, Stefan Sauer wrote:
> > > hi,
> > >
> > > did anyone try the new 'no-xslt' toolchain yet? In configu
On Wed, 2019-02-13 at 21:58 +0100, Stefan Sauer wrote:
> hi,
>
> did anyone try the new 'no-xslt' toolchain yet? In configure.ac all
> you need to do is:
>
> -GTK_DOC_CHECK([1.14])
> +GTK_DOC_CHECK([1.29],[--flavour no-xslt])
The m4 file shows the macro only taking one argument:
On Wed, 2019-01-30 at 10:38 +, Allan Day wrote:
> Bastien Nocera wrote:
> ...
> > > Regarding the app menu retirement initiative, the lack of
> > > progress on
> > > Totem [1] is also a concern.
> >
> > I already said this was on my todo list tho
On Wed, 2019-01-30 at 09:23 +0100, Carlos Soriano wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> We are quite close to 3.32 freezes! I thought it would be helpful for
> some maintainers and projects to summarize their 3.32 pressing issues
> that they could do with some help and see if someone in ddl would
> like to give a
On Wed, 2019-01-30 at 09:19 +, Allan Day via desktop-devel-list
wrote:
> Great initiative, Carlos!
>
> Carlos Soriano wrote:
> ...
> > gnome-screenshot, retire app menu - Part of the GNOME initiative to
> > remove app menus. There is a MR, needs some review. Deadline 4th
> > February, UI
On Wed, 2019-01-23 at 20:10 +, Debarshi Ray wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 23, 2019 at 08:02:16PM +0100, Bastien Nocera wrote:
> > On Wed, 2019-01-23 at 18:52 +, Debarshi Ray wrote:
> > > Grep for "Future of Pocket in GNOME" from 24th August 2018 in
> > > your
&g
On Wed, 2019-01-23 at 19:47 +, Debarshi Ray wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 23, 2019 at 05:39:44PM +0100, Bastien Nocera wrote:
> > As Emmanuele mentioned, the problem isn't so much that services
> > will
> > disappear from under the applications (but it's a problem
>
On Wed, 2019-01-23 at 11:54 -0600, mcatanz...@gnome.org wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 23, 2019 at 9:03 AM, Bastien Nocera
> wrote:
> > It is what is happening in GNOME Online Accounts in general. Pocket
> > is
> > disabled in Fedora 29, and there's a good chance that the mai
On Wed, 2019-01-23 at 18:52 +, Debarshi Ray wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 23, 2019 at 04:03:41PM +0100, Bastien Nocera wrote:
> > On Wed, 2019-01-23 at 14:33 +, Allan Day wrote:
> > > That's not what's happening here. Until very recently, Debarshi
> > > was
> > >
On Wed, 2019-01-23 at 10:27 -0500, Matthias Clasen wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, Jan 23, 2019 at 10:03 AM Bastien Nocera
> wrote:
> > On Wed, 2019-01-23 at 14:33 +, Allan Day wrote:
> > > Bastien Nocera wrote:
> > >
> > > > Flip it o
On Wed, 2019-01-23 at 14:33 +, Allan Day wrote:
> Bastien Nocera wrote:
>
> > Flip it on its head and please suggest why, nowadays, any
> > application
> > developer, whether for a GNOME application or a third-party, would
> > spend time integrating servi
On Wed, 2019-01-23 at 12:25 +, Allan Day wrote:
> Emmanuele Bassi wrote:
> ...
> > > This approach isn't new, and you can read more detail here:
> > > https://wiki.gnome.org/Projects/GnomeOnlineAccounts/Goals
> > >
> >
> > I know the rationale. I never particularly agreed with it, because
>
On Wed, 2019-01-23 at 10:48 +, Allan Day wrote:
> Bastien Nocera wrote:
> ...
> > Removing GNOME Documents from the release is fine. The problem is
> > that
> > as it is removed from the release, it's an excuse for GNOME Online
> > Accounts to remove the
On Wed, 2019-01-23 at 10:39 +, Allan Day wrote:
> Emmanuele Bassi via desktop-devel-list
> wrote:
> ...
> > > We have a rule though: the account types exposed in
> > > gnome-online-accounts must be used by at least one core
> > > application.
> > > It's a good rule because it doesn't make
On Wed, 2019-01-23 at 10:17 +, Emmanuele Bassi via desktop-devel-
list wrote:
> On Mon, 21 Jan 2019 at 16:32, wrote:
>
> > We have a rule though: the account types exposed in
> > gnome-online-accounts must be used by at least one core
> > application.
> > It's a good rule because it
On Mon, 2019-01-21 at 10:32 -0600, mcatanz...@gnome.org wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 21, 2019 at 9:14 AM, Christopher Davis via
> desktop-devel-list wrote:
> > Hi Rishi,
> >
> > Cloud documents is an important part of where I want to move
> > forward
> > with the application,
> > so Online Accounts
On Thu, 2019-01-17 at 12:07 -0500, Christopher Davis via desktop-devel-
list wrote:
> > Maybe if a new maintainer takes over and can find answers to those
> > questions
>
> There is a current maintainer, but unfortunately they have not merged
> anything in a few months.
Despite what files in the
On Thu, 2019-01-17 at 17:04 +, Emmanuele Bassi via desktop-devel-
list wrote:
> On Thu, 17 Jan 2019 at 16:59, wrote:
>
> > Release and design teams also don't want redundant apps in core,
> > and
> > there is interest in somewhat reducing the number of apps in core.
> > We
> > had been
On Thu, 2019-01-17 at 15:17 +, Debarshi Ray wrote:
> Hello everybody,
>
> It's been a month since GNOME Documents was removed from the set of
> core utilities by the release team. See:
> https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-build-meta/merge_requests/157
>
> We are currently in the 3.31.x /
On Tue, 2019-01-15 at 10:58 +0100, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> On 15/01/2019 10:48, Bastien Nocera wrote:
> > On Tue, 2018-12-11 at 14:22 +0100, Carlos Soriano wrote:
> > > Hey,
> > >
> > > It has been a few months since we moved to GitLab. Apart of
&
On Tue, 2018-12-11 at 14:22 +0100, Carlos Soriano wrote:
> Hey,
>
> It has been a few months since we moved to GitLab. Apart of spurious
> issues, specific annoyances and frustrations, seems it has been
> generally good. I would like to gather some general feeling about it.
> Things that really
On Thu, 2019-01-10 at 12:37 +, Allan Day wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> With a little over three weeks until UI freeze, I wanted to share a
> summary of the outstanding tasks for the app menu retirement
> initiative [1].
>
> Every one of the target apps now has an MR to retire the app menu
> (great
On Wed, 2019-01-09 at 09:57 -0500, Michael Terry wrote:
> Does GNOME have a currently recommended automation framework for
> tests?
>
> I know dogtail, ldtp, and such were used in past. But I haven’t seen
> much talk in recent years about this part of the stack nor was I able
> to find any recent
On Fri, 2018-11-30 at 13:08 +0100, Stefan Sauer wrote:
> hi,
>
> for the near future I won't be able to work on gtk-doc feature requests.
> I am cleaning up the code to make it testable and converting the silly
> integrations tests into unit tests. This will help to get pasring
> issues/bugs
On Wed, 2018-10-17 at 21:52 +, Olav Vitters wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 17, 2018 at 06:32:44PM +0100, Emmanuele Bassi via
> desktop-devel-list wrote:
> > On Wed, 17 Oct 2018 at 18:30, Bastien Nocera
> > wrote:
> >
> > > On Wed, 2018-10-17 at 19:24 +0200, Alberto
On Wed, 2018-10-17 at 19:24 +0200, Alberto Salvia Novella via desktop-
devel-list wrote:
> https://youtu.be/
How is this person still allowed to post on d-d-l?
___
desktop-devel-list mailing list
desktop-devel-list@gnome.org
On Fri, 2018-09-28 at 16:53 +0100, Alberto Ruiz wrote:
>
>
> 2018-09-28 15:32 GMT+01:00 Allan Day :
> > Florian Müllner wrote:
> > >
> > > With regard to dropping the 'quit' action, is there any guidance
> > for
> > > background applications? That is, apps where closing all windows
> > does
> >
On Fri, 2018-09-21 at 21:08 +0200, Tomasz Torcz wrote:
>
> Going extra mile to “find” shortcut is never gonna fly. Years ago,
> we
> had a perfect solution for discovering shortcuts – relevant letters
> were underlined in the menus. In some cases underlining appeared
> only
> after Alt was
On Fri, 2018-09-21 at 12:24 +0100, Allan Day wrote:
> Bastien Nocera wrote:
> ...
> > > Putting aside the issue of outdated user docs,
> >
> > Well, it's a pretty big factor here.
>
> Can't we just remove out of date user docs?
We certainly can, though t
On Fri, 2018-09-21 at 14:26 +0100, Allan Day wrote:
> On Fri, 21 Sep 2018 at 12:54, wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, Sep 21, 2018 at 5:36 AM, Bastien Nocera
> > wrote:
> > > It's faster to access for users, has terser explanations (no need
> > > to
> > >
On Fri, 2018-09-21 at 11:05 +0100, Allan Day wrote:
> Bastien Nocera wrote:
> ...
> > ... The keyboard shortcuts dialogue in Videos is invaluable.
> >
> > Its contents used to be in the README file, which users wouldn't
> > see,
> > the user documentation s
On Thu, 2018-09-20 at 15:07 +0200, Alexandre Franke wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, Sep 20, 2018 at 12:52 PM Allan Day wrote:
> > To be honest, I'm not sure how successful the keyboard shortcut
> > windows
> > have been and I suspect that they're not being used a great deal.
>
> What are you basing
On Fri, 2018-08-03 at 09:03 +0200, Sebastian Geiger (Lanoxx) wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I have tested my patch and I can view the GTK-Doc Manual in DevHelp.
> I
> would be very happy if this change could be merged into Gtk-Doc.
Sorry, but I don't quite understand what you're asking of the wider
On Wed, 2018-03-21 at 17:37 -0400, Shaun McCance wrote:
> Hi Carlos,
>
> I think we might be talking about two different things. I was just
> referring to CGit links, not anything with bugs/issues and users. For
> example, redirecting this:
>
>
On Tue, 2018-02-13 at 15:13 +0100, Frederic Peters wrote:
> > On Tue, 2018-02-13 at 11:19 +, Emmanuele Bassi wrote:
> > > Work is in progress to let maintainers upload tarballs with the
> > > generate API reference for developer.gnome.org
> >
> > Hi,
> > okay, how is that supposed to work
1 - 100 of 941 matches
Mail list logo
