Re: DVCS

2008-10-28 Thread Zeeshan Ali Khattak
, Zeeshan Ali Khattak FSF member#5124 ___ desktop-devel-list mailing list desktop-devel-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list

Re: DVCS

2008-10-29 Thread Zeeshan Ali (Khattak)
Hi! On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 1:02 AM, Olav Vitters [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Tue, Oct 28, 2008 at 04:24:25PM +0200, Zeeshan Ali Khattak wrote: I remember that at GUADEC, we were seriously thinking about migrating to git but the decision was postponed on Mark Shuttleworth's request. It's

Re: DVCS

2008-10-29 Thread Zeeshan Ali (Khattak)
and it's been a long time we've been justing wishing and sighing. Could we please just execute the proposal I made? -- Regards, Zeeshan Ali Khattak FSF member#5124 ___ desktop-devel-list mailing list desktop-devel-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman

Re: DVCS

2008-10-29 Thread Zeeshan Ali (Khattak)
. After that I forgot. NP! I wasn't blaming you for that, was just explaining why i did what i did. :) -- Regards, Zeeshan Ali Khattak FSF member#5124 ___ desktop-devel-list mailing list desktop-devel-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman

Re: DVCS

2008-12-04 Thread Zeeshan Ali (Khattak)
(or it seems to be the case). I am no expert in svn but reading the output of `svn help log` i don't see it be done easily using svn. :( -- Regards, Zeeshan Ali (Khattak) FSF member#5124 ___ desktop-devel-list mailing list desktop-devel-list@gnome.org

Re: DVCS

2008-12-04 Thread Zeeshan Ali (Khattak)
On Fri, Dec 5, 2008 at 12:25 AM, Behdad Esfahbod [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Zeeshan Ali (Khattak) wrote: So you already on it or you are waiting for someone to get you th list of svn accounts? If latter is the case, It's pretty easily doable using git but unfortunately the dates in the git

Re: GNOME DVCS Survey Results

2009-01-04 Thread Zeeshan Ali (Khattak)
the move but in case I am right, I think we should seriously consider John's idea. -- Regards, Zeeshan Ali (Khattak) FSF member#5124 ___ desktop-devel-list mailing list desktop-devel-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list

Re: GNOME DVCS Survey Results

2009-01-04 Thread Zeeshan Ali (Khattak)
volunteers and together we can do it, even using our spare time. In any case, after looking at the results of the survey we should only look at hybrid/dual proposal like John's when we don't find any way of moving to git in a reasonable amount of time ( 6 months). -- Regards, Zeeshan Ali (Khattak

Re: GNOME DVCS Survey Results

2009-01-04 Thread Zeeshan Ali (Khattak)
working directory requires only one small index file that stores about 100 bytes of data per tracked file. On projects with a large number of files this can be a substantial difference in the disk space required per working copy. -- Regards, Zeeshan Ali (Khattak) FSF member#5124

Re: On autogenerated ChangeLog

2009-04-21 Thread Zeeshan Ali (Khattak)
that in ChangeLog? A policy/rule? We could have the same policy/rule for NEWS file. -- Regards, Zeeshan Ali (Khattak) FSF member#5124 ___ desktop-devel-list mailing list desktop-devel-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list

Re: On autogenerated ChangeLog

2009-04-21 Thread Zeeshan Ali (Khattak)
that describes what happens in the change Then why would I waste my time flipping through individual commit logs ? Dude, we have moved to git and you are still talking of versioned ChangeLog and favoring large patches? -- Regards, Zeeshan Ali (Khattak) FSF member#5124

Re: On autogenerated ChangeLog

2009-04-21 Thread Zeeshan Ali (Khattak)
to discuss it. :) There are simply two facts to be kept in mind here: 1. All information in the ChangeLog is redundant. 2. Maintaining a ChangeLog only and only realizes otherwise inexistent conflicts. It is as simple as that. -- Regards, Zeeshan Ali (Khattak) FSF member#5124

Re: R: git migration - svn:externals

2009-04-23 Thread Zeeshan Ali (Khattak)
, you either put that common stuff in another module/package and make other packages depend on this or you just bite the bullet and don't mind the redundancy. In some cases you just have to wisely use the combination of both. -- Regards, Zeeshan Ali (Khattak) FSF member#5124

fast-forward only policy

2009-05-04 Thread Zeeshan Ali (Khattak)
zeenix ok, will do ==IRC LOG END== I am sending this mail here cause I thought it might be better to have a discussion on this and so that other developers can speak-up if they (dis)agree. -- Regards, Zeeshan Ali (Khattak) FSF member#5124 ___ desktop

Re: fast-forward only policy

2009-05-05 Thread Zeeshan Ali (Khattak)
arrived at the same conclusion after reading John's and your arguments. :) -- Regards, Zeeshan Ali (Khattak) FSF member#5124 ___ desktop-devel-list mailing list desktop-devel-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list

Re: git and trailing whitespace

2009-05-05 Thread Zeeshan Ali (Khattak)
opinions always welcomed of course. :) -- Regards, Zeeshan Ali (Khattak) FSF member#5124 ___ desktop-devel-list mailing list desktop-devel-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list

Re: fast-forward only policy

2009-05-05 Thread Zeeshan Ali (Khattak)
on *GIT* pushes. -- Regards, Zeeshan Ali (Khattak) FSF member#5124 ___ desktop-devel-list mailing list desktop-devel-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list

Re: git and trailing whitespace

2009-05-05 Thread Zeeshan Ali (Khattak)
On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 1:02 AM, Behdad Esfahbod beh...@behdad.org wrote: On 05/05/2009 05:59 PM, Zeeshan Ali (Khattak) wrote: On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 12:06 AM, Behdad Esfahbodbeh...@behdad.org  wrote: On 05/05/2009 05:00 PM, Lennart Poettering wrote: Anyway, Owen said he didn't want

Re: fast-forward only policy

2009-05-06 Thread Zeeshan Ali (Khattak)
Hi, On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 8:54 AM, Olav Vitters o...@bkor.dhs.org wrote: On Wed, May 06, 2009 at 01:13:07AM +0300, Zeeshan Ali (Khattak) wrote: On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 12:46 AM, Olav Vitters o...@bkor.dhs.org wrote: On Wed, May 06, 2009 at 12:33:59AM +0300, Felipe Contreras wrote: Imagine

Re: Platform

2009-05-19 Thread Zeeshan Ali (Khattak)
is overly complicated for service discovery. Actually that is pretty stright forward but it does something (not so) stupid for that: HTTP over UDP. That issue IMO is only of academic interest though. -- Regards, Zeeshan Ali (Khattak) FSF member#5124

Re: Platform

2009-05-19 Thread Zeeshan Ali (Khattak)
any means for description[1], control, event notification and presentation. -- Regards, Zeeshan Ali (Khattak) FSF member#5124 [1] We all know how useful D-Bus introspection with d-feet is, the usefulness of UPnP description combined with gupnp-universal-cp is quite the same

Re: External dependency proposal: Vala

2009-10-12 Thread Zeeshan Ali (Khattak)
the bindings (ones bundled with vala)? They are still far from perfect AFAIK. -- Regards, Zeeshan Ali (Khattak) FSF member#5124 ___ desktop-devel-list mailing list desktop-devel-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list

Re: New module proposal: tracker

2009-10-28 Thread Zeeshan Ali (Khattak)
, -1 from my side. -- Regards, Zeeshan Ali (Khattak) FSF member#5124 ___ desktop-devel-list mailing list desktop-devel-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list

Re: New module proposal: tracker

2009-10-28 Thread Zeeshan Ali (Khattak)
On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 12:59 AM, Ivan Frade ivan.fr...@gmail.com wrote: Hi On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 11:22 PM, Zeeshan Ali (Khattak) zee...@gmail.com wrote: Hi,  FWIW, as the maintainer of a project (Rygel) which started as a UPnP wrapper around Tracker an year and half ago, I don't think

Re: New module proposal: tracker

2009-10-29 Thread Zeeshan Ali (Khattak)
Hi, On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 1:05 PM, Martyn Russell mar...@lanedo.com wrote: On 28/10/09 23:23, Zeeshan Ali (Khattak) wrote: I think assuming that a project has to be shipped by distros before it can be in GNOME or visa versa doesn't make sense. Distros ALWAYS ship what they want

Re: New module proposal: tracker

2009-11-13 Thread Zeeshan Ali (Khattak)
, Zeeshan Ali (Khattak) FSF member#5124 ___ desktop-devel-list mailing list desktop-devel-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list

Re: New module proposal: tracker

2009-11-23 Thread Zeeshan Ali (Khattak)
On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 5:51 PM, Martyn Russell mar...@lanedo.com wrote: On 13/11/09 17:21, Zeeshan Ali (Khattak) wrote: Hi all,   So now that tracker is a blessed external dep of GN(u)OME, can issues like these be fixed soon(ish): https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=601799    Its

Re: Module Proposal: Rygel

2010-02-20 Thread Zeeshan Ali (Khattak)
3.0 readiness: I think so! The only specific relevant thing i find on ThreePointTwenty wiki is GObject introspection. Oops, I meant ThreePointZero plan wikipage. :) -- Regards, Zeeshan Ali (Khattak) FSF member#5124 ___ desktop-devel-list

Re: Module Proposal: Rygel

2010-02-22 Thread Zeeshan Ali (Khattak)
running on session-bus (e.g tracker, rhythmbox, totem)? Lastly, rygel can be run as both system-wide service and per-session at the same time on the same machine. -- Regards, Zeeshan Ali (Khattak) FSF member#5124 [1] Currently it's actually per-session because of D-Bus limitation but plan

Re: Module Proposal: Rygel

2010-02-22 Thread Zeeshan Ali (Khattak)
Hi Frederic! On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 9:59 AM, Frederic Peters fpet...@gnome.org wrote: Zeeshan Ali (Khattak) wrote: Adoption GNOME-ness, community: We have pride in our incredible translation teams; it would be really nice if Rygel had the infrastructure in place to be translated

Re: Module Proposal: Rygel

2010-02-22 Thread Zeeshan Ali (Khattak)
or not. -- Regards, Zeeshan Ali (Khattak) FSF member#5124 ___ desktop-devel-list mailing list desktop-devel-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list

Re: Module Proposal: Rygel

2010-02-22 Thread Zeeshan Ali (Khattak)
of policy?Some system-wide services are really useful for desktop, would GNOME adopt them? I don't think I alone can answer these questions and in this case I shouldn't say anything being biased. :) -- Regards, Zeeshan Ali (Khattak) FSF member#5124

Re: Module Proposal: Rygel

2010-02-22 Thread Zeeshan Ali (Khattak)
agree on getting rid of this UI mostly and move the remaining parts to gnome-user-share UI. Now lets see if Bastien agrees. :) -- Regards, Zeeshan Ali (Khattak) FSF member#5124 ___ desktop-devel-list mailing list desktop-devel-list@gnome.org http

Re: Module Proposal: Rygel

2010-02-22 Thread Zeeshan Ali (Khattak)
to depend on that. -- Regards, Zeeshan Ali (Khattak) FSF member#5124 ___ desktop-devel-list mailing list desktop-devel-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list

Re: Module Proposal: Rygel

2010-02-24 Thread Zeeshan Ali (Khattak)
Hi, On Sat, Feb 20, 2010 at 11:57 PM, Zeeshan Ali (Khattak) zee...@gmail.com wrote:  * Rygel is already readily available in two major distributions: Debian and Fedora. Now it's also available in Ubuntu (lucid). Its also available in an unofficial Gentoo repo: http://gpo.zugaina.org/net

Re: Module Proposal: Rygel

2010-03-19 Thread Zeeshan Ali (Khattak)
the preferences UI in favor of some simple options to be added to gnome-user-share dialog, do I still need to do this for my proposal to be considered? -- Regards, Zeeshan Ali (Khattak) FSF member#5124 ___ desktop-devel-list mailing list desktop-devel-list@gnome.org

Re: Module Proposal: Rygel

2010-03-19 Thread Zeeshan Ali (Khattak)
Hi, On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 2:56 PM, Frederic Peters fpet...@gnome.org wrote: Zeeshan Ali (Khattak) wrote: Heh, the logic should be reversed :-) It can't be approved (or likely to be approved) until the app is translatable.   Since me and Bastien (based on Lennart's arguments

Re: Module Proposal: Rygel

2010-03-19 Thread Zeeshan Ali (Khattak)
be powered by Tracker). Actually this issue is partly solved. I made sure that tracker guys have the right ontology caugh..metadata keys for this. However, there is currently no UI for user to be able to mark media to be exported. -- Regards, Zeeshan Ali (Khattak) FSF member#5124 [1] Except

Re: Module Proposal: Rygel

2010-03-19 Thread Zeeshan Ali (Khattak)
On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 4:53 PM, Vincent Untz vu...@gnome.org wrote: Le vendredi 19 mars 2010, à 16:39 +0200, Zeeshan Ali (Khattak) a écrit :    I didn't miss that. :) If you read carefully he said just to be safe and hence it's not so important. Still, I tried to setup the I said on the safe

Re: GSoC Proposal: Scripting Framework for Applications

2010-04-08 Thread Zeeshan Ali (Khattak)
. Moreover, we'll get gobejct-introspection support for free. -- Regards, Zeeshan Ali (Khattak) FSF member#5124 ___ desktop-devel-list mailing list desktop-devel-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list

Re: Finding and Reminding, tech issues, 3.0 and beyond

2010-04-11 Thread Zeeshan Ali (Khattak)
the MediaServer spec I mentioned, I would have just informed Tracker guys which API is slow and it would have been upto them to optimize it. i-e I wouldn't have needed to even know about optionals and property functions, let alone to change/redesign my code to make the queries faster. -- Regards, Zeeshan Ali

Re: Module Proposal: Rygel

2010-04-19 Thread Zeeshan Ali (Khattak)
Hi, On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 5:53 PM, Vincent Untz vu...@gnome.org wrote: Le vendredi 19 mars 2010, à 16:39 +0200, Zeeshan Ali (Khattak) a écrit :    I didn't miss that. :) If you read carefully he said just to be safe and hence it's not so important. Still, I tried to setup the I said

Re: new module proposal: gobject-introspection

2010-04-23 Thread Zeeshan Ali (Khattak)
be bigger issue than not supporting nested namespaces AFAICT. -- Regards, Zeeshan Ali (Khattak) FSF member#5124 ___ desktop-devel-list mailing list desktop-devel-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list

Re: new module proposal: gobject-introspection

2010-04-25 Thread Zeeshan Ali (Khattak)
On Sat, Apr 24, 2010 at 4:13 PM, Colin Walters walt...@verbum.org wrote: On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 7:22 PM, Zeeshan Ali (Khattak) zee...@gmail.com wrote:  Talking of namespaces, is it correct that gir does not allow multiple libs to share a namespace? If so, that could be bigger issue than

Re: Documentation for Proposed Modules

2010-05-06 Thread Zeeshan Ali (Khattak)
invisible to an end-user, I doubt rygel needs any such docs. Please feel free to contradict me. :) -- Regards, Zeeshan Ali (Khattak) FSF member#5124 ___ desktop-devel-list mailing list desktop-devel-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo

Re: Documentation for Proposed Modules

2010-05-06 Thread Zeeshan Ali (Khattak)
). -- Regards, Zeeshan Ali (Khattak) FSF member#5124 ___ desktop-devel-list mailing list desktop-devel-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list

Re: Documentation for Proposed Modules

2010-05-06 Thread Zeeshan Ali (Khattak)
the existence of these plugins to user. Unless Tracker guys (promise to) provide DLNA related options in their preferences UI? -- Regards, Zeeshan Ali (Khattak) FSF member#5124 ___ desktop-devel-list mailing list desktop-devel-list@gnome.org http

New external dependencies for Rygel: GUPnP Libgee

2010-06-07 Thread Zeeshan Ali (Khattak)
two of the libraries above indirectly (empathy) or optionally (gnome-user-share). -- Regards, Zeeshan Ali (Khattak) FSF member#5124 [1] http://www.gupnp.org [2] http://live.gnome.org/Libgee ___ desktop-devel-list mailing list desktop-devel-list@gnome.org

Re: New external dependencies for Rygel: GUPnP Libgee

2010-06-07 Thread Zeeshan Ali (Khattak)
that people have already tested it along with its dependencies. -- Regards, Zeeshan Ali (Khattak) FSF member#5124 ___ desktop-devel-list mailing list desktop-devel-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list

Re: New external dependencies for Rygel: GUPnP Libgee

2010-06-08 Thread Zeeshan Ali (Khattak)
Hi, On Tue, Jun 8, 2010 at 2:00 PM, Frederic Peters fpet...@gnome.org wrote: Zeeshan Ali (Khattak) wrote: Did you read http://live.gnome.org/TwoPointThirtyone/ExternalDependencies?   I did but then again I've been reading a lot lately so things have been slipping of my mind. Especially

Vala version bump?

2010-06-09 Thread Zeeshan Ali (Khattak)
the minimum version to 0.9.0 and recommended version to 0.9.1? -- Regards, Zeeshan Ali (Khattak) FSF member#5124 [1] http://live.gnome.org/TwoPointThirtyone/ExternalDependencies ___ desktop-devel-list mailing list desktop-devel-list@gnome.org http

Re: Vala version bump?

2010-06-10 Thread Zeeshan Ali (Khattak)
Hi, On Wed, Jun 9, 2010 at 6:24 PM, Zeeshan Ali (Khattak) zee...@gmail.com wrote: Hi everyone,  While Rygel currently depends on (and is tested with) Vala 0.8.0, the minimum version of Vala on external deps wikipage[1] is 0.7.8 and recommended is 0.8.1. Moreover, Jürg tells me that its

Re: New external dependencies for Rygel: GUPnP Libgee

2010-06-17 Thread Zeeshan Ali (Khattak)
and only sync to gnome git master twice a month. :( I hope thats OK with everyone? -- Regards, Zeeshan Ali (Khattak) FSF member#5124 ___ desktop-devel-list mailing list desktop-devel-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list

Re: New external dependencies for Rygel: GUPnP Libgee

2010-06-18 Thread Zeeshan Ali (Khattak)
Hi, On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 10:40 AM, Frederic Peters fpet...@gnome.org wrote: Zeeshan Ali (Khattak) wrote:   When I said that, I thought it takes a few days but seems that is not the case. Its been like 10 days that I made this proposal, nobody objected on the deps but nobody seems

Bump min vala version to 0.9.3

2010-07-14 Thread Zeeshan Ali (Khattak)
Hi, The new vala release contains some improvements to glib API that breaks rygel's build so I would like to use vala 0.9.3 in the next release. -- Regards, Zeeshan Ali (Khattak) FSF member#5124 ___ desktop-devel-list mailing list desktop-devel

Re: Bump min vala version to 0.9.3

2010-07-15 Thread Zeeshan Ali (Khattak)
Hi, I realized later that this is a micro version bump and I can change it myself so went and did that (jhbuild and wiki). On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 3:30 PM, Maciej Piechotka uzytkown...@gmail.com wrote: On 15/07/10 01:18, Zeeshan Ali (Khattak) wrote: Hi,    The new vala release contains some

New external dependencies for Rygel: GUPnP DLNA

2010-07-15 Thread Zeeshan Ali (Khattak)
: http://lists.o-hand.com/gupnp/0915.html http://lists.o-hand.com/gupnp/0975.html -- Regards, Zeeshan Ali (Khattak) FSF member#5124 [1] http://gupnp.org/sources/gupnp-dlna/ ___ desktop-devel-list mailing list desktop-devel-list@gnome.org http

Bumping gupnp-dlna requirement

2010-08-12 Thread Zeeshan Ali (Khattak)
that. That said, API/ABI of gupnp* (including gupnp-dlna) is guaranteed to be frozen in 2 weeks. -- Regards, Zeeshan Ali (Khattak) FSF member#5124 ___ desktop-devel-list mailing list desktop-devel-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo

Re: It's Release Notes time!

2010-08-26 Thread Zeeshan Ali (Khattak)
Hi Paul, On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 5:51 AM, Paul Cutler pcut...@gnome.org wrote: Hi, We're still pretty light on content for the upcoming 2.32 release. I just added some bullets off the top of my head about basic features Rygel's inclusion will add to GNOME. I'm not very good at this so

Re: It's Release Notes time!

2010-09-30 Thread Zeeshan Ali (Khattak)
by putting the features I put-up on the wiki that rygel adds to GNOME, in nice words for users. -- Regards, Zeeshan Ali (Khattak) FSF member#5124 ___ desktop-devel-list mailing list desktop-devel-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop

Re: It's Release Notes time!

2010-09-30 Thread Zeeshan Ali (Khattak)
On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 3:19 PM, Bastien Nocera had...@hadess.net wrote: On Thu, 2010-09-30 at 15:00 +0300, Zeeshan Ali (Khattak) wrote: Hi, On Sat, Aug 21, 2010 at 9:23 PM, Paul Cutler pcut...@gnome.org wrote: Can you feel it in the air?  It's that time when we start writing release notes

Re: It's Release Notes time!

2010-09-30 Thread Zeeshan Ali (Khattak)
On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 3:08 PM, Andre Klapper ak...@gmx.net wrote: Am Donnerstag, den 30.09.2010, 15:00 +0300 schrieb Zeeshan Ali (Khattak):   I tried my best to help you out in this regard while fixing all the critical issues in rygel and the deps in time for GNOME 2.32. What do I get

Bump min vala version to 0.11.1

2010-10-29 Thread Zeeshan Ali (Khattak)
will soon need to require it as well. -- Regards, Zeeshan Ali (Khattak) FSF member#5124 ___ desktop-devel-list mailing list desktop-devel-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list

Bump gupnp-av and gupnp-vala dep

2010-11-05 Thread Zeeshan Ali (Khattak)
Hi everyone, I hope nobody minds if I bump minimum gupnp-av and gupnp-vala dep to 0.7.0 (for rygel)? This is an unreleased version but I'll not commit the sin of depending on unreleased external library so don't worry about that. :) -- Regards, Zeeshan Ali (Khattak) FSF member#5124

Re: Consolidating Core Desktop libraries

2010-11-24 Thread Zeeshan Ali (Khattak)
to application developer. Album art is a different issue, and you depend there on external providers. That does't mean we can't have the same service (application) handling both. Not that is not possible, but requires a second thought. Sure, what doesn't? :) -- Regards, Zeeshan Ali (Khattak) FSF

Re: Proposal: Moving d-d-l to moderated until after GNOME 3 release

2011-01-09 Thread Zeeshan Ali (Khattak)
open, to discuss things publicly as we have had it for years. +1 -- Regards, Zeeshan Ali (Khattak) FSF member#5124 ___ desktop-devel-list mailing list desktop-devel-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list

Re: Bump vala requirement

2011-02-16 Thread Zeeshan Ali (Khattak)
On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 12:23 PM, Jens Georg m...@jensge.org wrote: Hi, rygel needs valac 0.11.6 since it fixes a codegen bug which leads to a crash in one of our plugins. IIRC, micro version could be bumped without notification/request(?). -- Regards, Zeeshan Ali (Khattak) FSF member

GUPnP inclusion

2011-05-09 Thread Zeeshan Ali (Khattak)
Ali (Khattak) FSF member#5124 [1] https://live.gnome.org/ThreePointOne/Features/Sharing [2] https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=648704 https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=625933 https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=648112 [3] gssdp, gupnp, gupnp-av, gupnp-dlna

Re: GUPnP inclusion

2011-05-15 Thread Zeeshan Ali (Khattak)
forget) but then this move of GUPnP process started and I decided to wait on that so I don't end-up putting links into out website that will break soon. -- Regards, Zeeshan Ali (Khattak) FSF member#5124 ___ desktop-devel-list mailing list desktop-devel-list

Re: On the Interaction with the design team

2011-06-03 Thread Zeeshan Ali (Khattak)
. The rest should simply 'adapt'. -- Regards, Zeeshan Ali (Khattak) FSF member#5124 ___ desktop-devel-list mailing list desktop-devel-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list

Re: GNOME user survey 2011

2011-07-31 Thread Zeeshan Ali (Khattak)
: * How often do you use terminal/console? * How do you rate your computer skills from 1-10. * etc Also, most people are still on facebook so better advertise this on facebook gnome3 page too. Other than that, the questionare you came-up looks good. :) -- Regards, Zeeshan Ali (Khattak) FSF

Re: GNOME user survey 2011

2011-07-31 Thread Zeeshan Ali (Khattak)
On Sun, Jul 31, 2011 at 7:49 PM, Maciej Piechotka uzytkown...@gmail.com wrote: On Sun, 2011-07-31 at 19:40 +0300, Zeeshan Ali (Khattak) wrote: On Sun, Jul 31, 2011 at 7:11 PM, Felipe Contreras felipe.contre...@gmail.com wrote: It would be great if some sort of notification would popup

Re: GNOME user survey 2011 (v4)

2011-08-17 Thread Zeeshan Ali (Khattak)
much targeted for this type of users. Before you ask, no I don't know how you can do that. -- Regards, Zeeshan Ali (Khattak) FSF member#5124 ___ desktop-devel-list mailing list desktop-devel-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop

Re: GNOME user survey 2011 (v4)

2011-08-18 Thread Zeeshan Ali (Khattak)
. Ignoring input from others just because they don't have a solution for the problem(s) they point out isn't going to lead anywhere. -- Regards, Zeeshan Ali (Khattak) FSF member#5124 ___ desktop-devel-list mailing list desktop-devel-list@gnome.org http

Re: GNOME user survey 2011 (v4)

2011-08-18 Thread Zeeshan Ali (Khattak)
of knowing that? Would those results still be better than nothing in your opinion? -- Regards, Zeeshan Ali (Khattak) FSF member#5124 ___ desktop-devel-list mailing list desktop-devel-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel

Re: GNOME user survey 2011 (v4)

2011-08-18 Thread Zeeshan Ali (Khattak)
On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 2:09 AM, Felipe Contreras felipe.contre...@gmail.com wrote: On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 1:20 AM, Zeeshan Ali (Khattak) zeesha...@gnome.org wrote: On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 12:45 AM, Felipe Contreras felipe.contre...@gmail.com wrote: Nothing is ever perfect, but having

Re: GNOME user survey 2011 (v4)

2011-08-19 Thread Zeeshan Ali (Khattak)
Ali (Khattak) FSF member#5124 ___ desktop-devel-list mailing list desktop-devel-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list

Re: GNOME user survey 2011 (v4)

2011-08-19 Thread Zeeshan Ali (Khattak)
On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 10:12 AM, Luc Pionchon pionchon@gmail.com wrote: On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 03:34, Zeeshan Ali (Khattak) zeesha...@gnome.org wrote: [snip]  Maybe they all lied? Don't you think it is a bit early to speculate on results? (...) Overall I can see already one clear

gudev from my grandpa

2011-08-25 Thread Zeeshan Ali (Khattak)
Hi everyone, David Zeuthen pointed out that gudev in jhbuild (3.2 modulesets) is several years old (from 08-Dec-2004) and we really should use some recent enough release of it. Is there a particular reason we are doing this or shall I fix this? -- Regards, Zeeshan Ali (Khattak) FSF member

Re: gudev from my grandpa

2011-08-25 Thread Zeeshan Ali (Khattak)
On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 1:30 PM, Andre Klapper ak...@gmx.net wrote: On Thu, 2011-08-25 at 13:23 +0300, Zeeshan Ali (Khattak) wrote: Hi everyone,   David Zeuthen pointed out that gudev in jhbuild (3.2 modulesets) is several years old (from 08-Dec-2004) For the records, http://git.gnome.org

Re: gudev from my grandpa

2011-08-25 Thread Zeeshan Ali (Khattak)
On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 2:36 PM, Olav Vitters o...@vitters.nl wrote: On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 01:34:36PM +0300, Zeeshan Ali (Khattak) wrote:   Ah, sorry! My dyslexia kicks-in sometimes. However, thats still pretty old so my question remains. We upgrade if needed. Keeping the requirements low

Re: Launching an application requires too many mouse clicks in Gnome 3

2011-09-04 Thread Zeeshan Ali (Khattak)
name of the application. Where as in overview mode, she/he just types a few letters of either the name of the command or the generic name. For example, typing 'mus' in the overview-mode brings-up rhythmbox as the only option. -- Regards, Zeeshan Ali (Khattak) FSF member#5124

Re: From here to apps

2011-09-26 Thread Zeeshan Ali (Khattak)
) of this 'conflict' is limited to UI only. -- Regards, Zeeshan Ali (Khattak) FSF member#5124 [1] https://live.gnome.org/Design/Apps/Boxes [2] Since many components of UI are common with Documents, I intend to re-use/steal code from there. ___ desktop-devel-list

Re: Features !

2011-10-08 Thread Zeeshan Ali (Khattak)
they didn't get any time for this one. Lapo has started to investigate this it seems and last I asked Bastien, he was also interested(?) in getting this done in 3.3 cycle. -- Regards, Zeeshan Ali (Khattak) FSF member#5124 ___ desktop-devel-list mailing

Re: Boxes (was Re: 3.4 Features, final round)

2011-11-07 Thread Zeeshan Ali (Khattak)
and completely secure way to try out OSs. I think these features are very essential and therefore should be available in every GNOME installation out of the box. -- Regards, Zeeshan Ali (Khattak) FSF member#5124 ___ desktop-devel-list mailing list

Boxes and 3.4

2011-11-29 Thread Zeeshan Ali (Khattak)
? * is Boxes going to be a 'preview' feature in 3.4 like Documents was in 3.2? Release team? everyone? -- Regards, Zeeshan Ali (Khattak) FSF member#5124 ___ desktop-devel-list mailing list desktop-devel-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo

Re: Boxes and 3.4

2011-11-30 Thread Zeeshan Ali (Khattak)
, Zeeshan Ali (Khattak) FSF member#5124 ___ desktop-devel-list mailing list desktop-devel-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list

Re: Boxes and 3.4

2011-11-30 Thread Zeeshan Ali (Khattak)
On Thu, Dec 1, 2011 at 4:49 AM, Zeeshan Ali (Khattak) zeesha...@gnome.org wrote: On Thu, Dec 1, 2011 at 12:32 AM, Andrew Cowie and...@operationaldynamics.com wrote: We're getting *ransacked* out there in discussions in LUGs around the world (e.g. [1]) because power users are trying GNOME 3

Re: multiple vala versions in 3.4

2012-01-20 Thread Zeeshan Ali (Khattak)
. The issue is the bindings usually. There are way too many of the libraries to take care of and on top of that they change all the time. Ideally each library should be providing vala bindings and take care of keeping it up2date. So its really not a fault of vala itself. -- Regards, Zeeshan Ali

Re: multiple vala versions in 3.4

2012-01-21 Thread Zeeshan Ali (Khattak)
namespaces. While it is true that ideal scenerio would be for Vala to simply use gir/typelib but gir is missing features supported by vala and its bindings for many years now. Nested namespace is one of them. Another example is default values for parameters. -- Regards, Zeeshan Ali (Khattak) FSF member

Re: multiple vala versions in 3.4

2012-01-22 Thread Zeeshan Ali (Khattak)
On Sun, Jan 22, 2012 at 11:50 PM, Christophe Fergeau t...@gnome.org wrote: 2012/1/21 Zeeshan Ali (Khattak) zeesha...@gnome.org: Being a maintainer of 2 vala projects in GNOME, I can tell you that valac itself is pretty stable these days and it gets more and more stable all the time. The issue

Re: multiple vala versions in 3.4

2012-01-23 Thread Zeeshan Ali (Khattak)
On Mon, Jan 23, 2012 at 9:53 AM, Emmanuele Bassi eba...@gmail.com wrote: hi Zeeshan; Hi Emmanuele, On 23 January 2012 02:14, Zeeshan Ali (Khattak) zeesha...@gnome.org wrote: On Sun, Jan 22, 2012 at 11:50 PM, Christophe Fergeau t...@gnome.org wrote: 2012/1/21 Zeeshan Ali (Khattak) zeesha

Re: Introducing Photos

2012-05-10 Thread Zeeshan Ali (Khattak)
). -- Regards, Zeeshan Ali (Khattak) FSF member#5124 ___ desktop-devel-list mailing list desktop-devel-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list

Introducing Boxes non-free

2012-07-14 Thread Zeeshan Ali (Khattak)
it by GNOME releases. Release tarball available at: http://download.gnome.org/sources/gnome-boxes-nonfree/0.0/ -- Regards, Zeeshan Ali (Khattak) FSF member#5124 [1] https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=671251 ___ desktop-devel-list mailing list

Re: Dropping gupnp-vala

2012-11-30 Thread Zeeshan Ali (Khattak)
their feet. So I'll say go ahead and remove it. -- Regards, Zeeshan Ali (Khattak) FSF member#5124 ___ desktop-devel-list mailing list desktop-devel-list@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list

Re: TARBALLS DUE: GNOME 3.7.5

2013-02-04 Thread Zeeshan Ali (Khattak)
the tarball but can't seem to be able to install it: http://paste.stg.fedoraproject.org/3649 -- Regards, Zeeshan Ali (Khattak) FSF member#5124 ___ desktop-devel-list mailing list desktop-devel-list@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel

Re: About clutter-gtk and his lack of accessibility support

2013-02-14 Thread Zeeshan Ali (Khattak)
it in time for 3.8 does not sound realistic. -- Regards, Zeeshan Ali (Khattak) FSF member#5124 ___ desktop-devel-list mailing list desktop-devel-list@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list

Re: [GSoC 2013] Ability to save and load virtual machine boxes

2013-04-19 Thread Zeeshan Ali (Khattak)
saying that please be patient if you don't get replies in time. -- Regards, Zeeshan Ali (Khattak) FSF member#5124 [1] http://live.gnome.org/Jhbuild [2]https://bugzilla.gnome.org/buglist.cgi?emailassigned_to1=1;query_format=advanced;bug_status=UNCONFIRMED;bug_status=NEW;bug_status=ASSIGNED

Re: Smoketesting 3.9.5 release

2013-08-01 Thread Zeeshan Ali (Khattak)
sure to get gnome-maps and its deps out in time but I don't see it in the modules list. Was it included? -- Regards, Zeeshan Ali (Khattak) FSF member#5124 ___ desktop-devel-list mailing list desktop-devel-list@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman

Re: [Fwd: Geoclue2 merge into Geoclue master]

2013-08-04 Thread Zeeshan Ali (Khattak)
using old APIs for geocode-glib) and stuff that will need porting to Geoclue2. Oh and before we start porting apps, I must move geoclue to system bus. -- Regards, Zeeshan Ali (Khattak) FSF member#5124 ___ desktop-devel-list mailing list desktop-devel

  1   2   >