in the works I guess our time is better spend on
some other task.
Cheers
Pontus Ullgren
On Mon, Oct 9, 2017 at 10:18 AM Claus Ibsen wrote:
>
> Hi
>
> Just blogged and recorded a video about some cool new tooling on the
> way for Apache Camel 2.21.
>
> Route coverage of Camel
I also like the idea but with some comments.
As Hiram Chirino I'm not sure YAML/JSON is the best language for this.
Perhaps a more fluent DSL like the Camel Java DSL or perhaps something like
Ballerina language would be better suited ?
Also in my experience even simple integrations, that is
GitHub user ullgren opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/camel/pull/2204
CAMEL-12223: camel-json-validator: Removed metioning of Everit from dâ¦
â¦ocumentation and code comments.
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https
GitHub user ullgren opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/camel/pull/1986
Initial version of camel-everit-json-schema component
Initial pull request for a JSON Schema validator component based on the
Everit JSON Schema library. If this is of interest I have backport
Sorry my bad. Must have had a old version cached somehow.
The link is indeed no longer there.
// Pontus
On Wed, 6 Sep 2017 at 22:14 Pontus Ullgren <ullg...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Actually there is a link to this page from the Camle website in the menu
> on the right hand side.
>
&
Actually there is a link to this page from the Camle website in the menu on
the right hand side.
In the section Community there is a link "Discussion Forums". That page
still mentions and links to Nabble.
// Pontus
On Wed, 6 Sep 2017 at 10:04 Claus Ibsen wrote:
> On
Instead of forking I would urge you to help updating the existing project.
What is currently blocking a new release is that the karaf itests is
failing.
Not using OSGi my self I would really need help with this. An alternative
would
be to drop all OSGi support from camel-extra which I would be
along another set of
> other questions: is it up to me/us or Salesforce to publish the jar in
> Maven central? And to what coordinates, Camels?
>
> That kinda feels more wrong to me :(
>
> zoran
>
> On Mon, Feb 20, 2017 at 9:48 PM, Pontus Ullgren <ullg...@gmail.com>
Hi,
Would it not be a better solution to publish the jar ourself to maven
central ?
Similare to what SMX project does for other 3rd party libraries that are
not osgi compatible bundles ?
Just my $0.02
// Pontus
On Mon, 20 Feb 2017 at 15:07 Zoran Regvart wrote:
> Hi
Hi,
A somewhat related question that I have been meaning to ask for a while.
Has there been any thoughts on the documentation for the camel extra
components?
It has previously been hosted on the ASF camel website but from what I can
tell this will no longer be the case after the switch to using
]: https://issues.sonatype.org/browse/OSSRH-1465
[2]: http://central.sonatype.org/pages/ossrh-guide.html
Best regards
Pontus Ullgren
On Mon, 30 Jan 2017 at 19:34 Krzysztof Sobkowiak <krzys.sobkow...@gmail.com>
wrote:
Hi
I'm asking you here because you release the Came Extra art
Github user ullgren closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/camel/pull/1408
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature
GitHub user ullgren opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/camel/pull/1408
CAMEL-10723: Improved camel-aws kinesis documentation
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/ullgren/camel CAMEL-10723
Alternatively
Please use the users mailing list[1] for this type of questions.
The dev mailing list is for development of Camel not developing WITH Camel.
As a incitement if you post the question to the user mailinglist I do have
an answer for you :-)
[1]
/maillinglist.
Anybody know who has access to update these resources ?
Also I would like to get admin access to the Camel-Extra Jira to be able to
complete a 2.18.0 release of Camel-Extra.
Thanks
Pontus Ullgren
efit of this would be that you could break backwards compatible as
much as you like.
Best regards
Pontus Ullgren
On Sun, 4 Dec 2016 at 11:26 sekaijin <jean-yves.terr...@aphp.fr> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The mongodb driver has changed in its foundation.
> It is recommended not t
st regards
// Pontus Ullgren
On Thu, 24 Nov 2016 at 05:22 Evgeny M <evgeny.minkev...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Good day.
>
> Springboot team is going to drop off the support for the remote shell.
>
> Would there be some appetite from the Apache Camel project team to continue
> providi
/Dashboard.jspa and it's own
mailing list (http://camel-extra.1091541.n5.nabble.com/).
Please also post there if you have any questions or comments.
Best regards
Pontus Ullgren
On Wed, 26 Oct 2016 at 16:17 fabryprog <fabrizio.spat...@bizmate.it> wrote:
> hello to everyone, the open source
Sorry the "forum" is also a mailing list so even if the forum post could be
delete all emails send out can not. So I advise you to change password as
soon as possible if you have not already done so.
Also the questions you raise are more suited for the user mailing list.
On Fri, 10 Jun 2016,
if there is somebody on the mailing list
that has more experience with Neo4j and the camel-spring-neo4j component
that can lend a hand.
[1]
http://camel-extra.1091541.n5.nabble.com/Problems-compiling-camel-spring-neo4j-td391.html
Thanks
Pontus Ullgren
tain" 2.15.0 I will create a specific branch.
>
> WDYT ?
>
> Regards
> JB
>
> On 11/13/2015 10:47 PM, Pontus Ullgren wrote:
> > So now the repository should be back "online".
> >
> > I did a reimport of the google code repository and then rebase
gt;
> On 11/16/2015 11:25 AM, Pontus Ullgren wrote:
> > (Moving the discussion to camel-dev)
> >
> > Yes I think we should start a 2.15.x branch.
> > Also now that we have moved camel-extra to github I think it is time to
> > start thinking about getting a
OK so the new imported repo was trashed I guess due to some forced push.
I will make a new try to fix this later.
Could you please wait with pushing commits for the time beeing.
// Pontus
On Fri, 13 Nov 2015 at 16:51 Pontus Ullgren <ullg...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hello.
>
> The c
to share knowledge of the extra
> project. I dont think people bother to signup on endless number of
> mailing lists.
>
>
>
> On Wed, Nov 11, 2015 at 8:45 AM, Pontus Ullgren <ullg...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > Any thoughts or comments on this ?
>
code.
Should we have a vote on this ? Or should this issue be handled on the
camel-extra mailing list instead ?
Best regards
Pontus Ullgren
On Sun, 1 Nov 2015 at 00:13 Pontus Ullgren <ullg...@gmail.com> wrote:
> A short update.
> Looked through the commits in the google code rep
JB
> >>
> >> On 10/29/2015 08:15 PM, Krzysztof Sobkowiak wrote:
> >>> Hi
> >>>
> >>> Have you already performed the migration to Github? Have you done it
> alone? I assume Infra doesn't support this process?
> >>>
> >>> Reg
could then sit down and move over the commits that makes sense from the
once that was done on github.
Comments ?
// Pontus
On Sat, 31 Oct 2015 at 15:51 Pontus Ullgren <ullg...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Yes, camel-extra copied to github quite some time ago. However after that
> there
GitHub user ullgren opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/camel/pull/622
CAMEL-9172 - Created camel-jolt component
Created a initial version of a camel-jolt component. JOLT is a JSON to JSON
transformation library written in Java where the "specific
not clear that we
> > have to keep camel-extra at SF - or why we couldn’t just move it to
> GitHub
> > ourselves ?
> >
> >
> > > On 4 Sep 2015, at 15:54, Pontus Ullgren <ullg...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > Victor and David: You are welcome to jo
Hi,
This type of questions is better suited for the users mailing list[1].
The dev mailing list is for development of camel itself.
But to answer your question endpoints created with the direct component[2]
is not accessible outside the local machine, or even outside the its own
camelcontext.
If
Pressed send a bit fast there sorry.
I'm planning to have a look at CAMEX-61[1] today and it would be nice to
know where it should be committed.
[1] https://camel-extra.atlassian.net/browse/CAMEX-61
On Tue, 28 Apr 2015 at 09:00 Pontus Ullgren ullg...@gmail.com wrote:
Think I already voted
Ullgren
On Fri, 17 Apr 2015 at 12:34 Andrea Cosentino ancosen1...@yahoo.com.invalid
wrote:
You're right. Today GitHub is the first choice in every new open source
project.
I hope they take the right decision.
On Friday, April 17, 2015 11:47 AM, Henryk Konsek hekon...@gmail.com
wrote
+1
On Sat, Apr 11, 2015 at 9:58 AM, Andrea Cosentino
ancosen1...@yahoo.com.invalid wrote:
From my point of view is the best solution.
+1
Da:Greg Autric gaut...@redhat.com
Data:ven, 10 apr, 2015 alle 19:16
Oggetto:[PROPOSAL] Move camel-extra from google code to github ?
Hi All,
as you
Github user ullgren closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/camel/pull/81
GitHub user ullgren opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/camel/pull/81
CAMEL-7101 - Add aggregation strategy to aggregate multiple messages int...
...o a zip file
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com
35 matches
Mail list logo