Re: remote_shell w/o apr

Hi, On Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 10:55 PM, Bjoern Petri bjoern.pe...@sundevil.de wrote: Hi everyone, Just finished removing apr from the remote_shell. Could someone do me the favor and try whether this still works on MacOS ? Checked this on MacOS Yosemite and it works fine. Good work.

Re: Back to work on the project again

Hi Erik, On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 4:37 PM, Alexander Broekhuis a.broekh...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Erik, Good to hear from you again! I think there are several issues you can pick up, just take a look at the issues. +1 In general I think we should aim for APR removal, fix/remove leaks etc and

Re: Board report

]: http://celix.apache.org/documentation/getting_started.html -- 2015-02-05 9:40 GMT+01:00 Pepijn Noltes pepijnnol...@gmail.com: On Wed, Feb 4, 2015 at 4:20 PM, Erik Jansman e...@jansman.eu wrote: Not sure if it should be here but I'll ask it anyway, what is the next big development

Re: Travis Continuous Integration

Hi All, On Sun, Jul 5, 2015 at 10:20 PM Bjoern Petri bjoern.pe...@sundevil.de wrote: Hi Gerrit, Indeed, Celix releases doesn't occur that often and I agree that we could benefit from changing that. Especially having alpha releases would offer a nice way for users to get early access

Fwd: Board Report

Apparently not everybody (nobody?) received this mail., so I am sending it again. -- Forwarded message - From: Pepijn Noltes pepijnnol...@gmail.com Date: Wed, Aug 12, 2015 at 2:59 PM Subject: Board Report To: dev@celix.apache.org dev@celix.apache.org Hi All, It is reporting

Re: celix cannot be build w/ cmake 3.3.1

Hi, On Sat, Oct 24, 2015 at 9:09 AM Bjoern Petri wrote: > > > Hi everyone, > > I took some time to dive a bit into this issue and suspect the following > bug to cause this behavior. > > https://public.kitware.com/Bug/view.php?id=15696. > > Building Celix w/ CMake 3.2

[DISCUSS] Service versions & semantic versioning

Hi All, I like to discuss how to handle service versions in Apache Celix. To start of, I like to shortly review how service versions are handled in the Java OSGi frameworks: In Java, services are versioned by their java interface package version. The OSGi framework will automatically select

Re: Fw: [DISCUSS] Service versions & semantic versioning

tokens. Hopefully this makes lhe last option a more clearer. Greetings, Pepijn > > Verzonden vanaf mijn Samsung-apparaat > > ---- Oorspronkelijk bericht > Van: Pepijn Noltes <pepijnnol...@gmail.com> > Datum: 28-10-2015 12:23 (GMT+01:00) > Aan: dev

shell refactoring

Hi All, I just pushed the shell refactoring branch to develop. Within this feature the command service has been updated. WIth this update you must implement a execute function working with a FILE streams (FILE *), for "normal" and error output, instead of two write functions. This was done so

Re: shell refactoring

to a stream abstraction (FILE in c) removed this workaround. It there any specific reason you ask this ? To be honest, I never (yet) had the need for multiple shell contexts ... Greetings, Pepijn > > Greetings, Marcel > > On 3 November 2015 at 10:21:02, Pepijn Noltes (pepijnnol...@gma

Re: Celix web console

Hi Erjan, On Sun, Oct 18, 2015 at 12:39 AM erjan altena wrote: > Hi all, > > I have created a web-console for Celix. This is a web framework which > listens for web-services. > Cool. I will try to have a look at it the coming days. > > Such a webservice should provide

Re: celix on android

Hi, On Thu, Jul 9, 2015 at 1:09 PM Bjoern Petri bjoern.pe...@sundevil.de wrote: Hi! While it is not a big deal to cross-compile Celix for ARM platforms which experience major support like the raspberry pi, it is more difficult to circumvent the dependencies when cross-compiling for

Celix website broken

Hi All, Just for info the Apache Celix website [1] is currently broken due to an issue in in infra. Bjoern already created an new issue for this [2] and hopefullly this will be solved quickly. [1] https://celix.apache.org [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-9956 Greetings, Pepijn

Documentation in github

Hi All, I would like to discuss the option to document more using markdown files in a documents subdir. Since our git is mirrored on github and github has a nice visualization of markdown files, I see an opportunity to document more using markdown files. I think documenting this way lowers

board report

. An alpha tag has been created. We are expecting a new release within two months. - Apache Celix was presented @ ApacheCon Europe by Bjoern Petri and Pepijn Noltes ## Health report: - Development (commits) activity is still increasing. - Mailing activity can be higher, but is acceptable for a small

Re: there is a an app for that

demonstrator github respectively. > > This launcher project is in my opinion a new project. Can't you keep it > on > > your github? Other option is the Inaetics github. > > Gerrit > > Op 21 jan. 2016 12:26 schreef "Pepijn Noltes" <pepijnnol...@gmail.com>

board report April

Hi All, It is reporting time again. See the draft report below, any remarks / questions are welcome. ## Description: - OSGi framework implementation in C. ## Issues: - there are no issues requiring board attention at this time ## Activity: - The activity for Celix is low at the moment. -

Re: Updated CMake bundle and deploy commands

ibs cmake command) > > For other changes it was well documented and working as advertised. > > > I've tried master and develop branch from GitHub GIT repository. > > I've also not tried the celix bootstrap project, but it looks really > interesting. +1 for it.

Re: C++ support

ith Celix by Rogier Velting, see > https://github.com/RogierWV/rust-celix > > Thanks for pointing that out. > > With kind regards, > > Gerrit > > On Wed, Jul 27, 2016 at 9:51 PM, Pepijn Noltes <pepijnnol...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > Hi Al

Celix development activity summary

Hi All, Starting today I want to post a bi-monthly Celix development activity summary update, listing on which (JIRA) issues work was done. This is done to more clearly expose the development activity of Apache Celix and to stimulate discussion on the celix-dev list. Please feel free to comment /

Re: Event Admin & saying hi

HI Erik, Good the hear from you. Yeah the API documentation could use some attention :). To prevent double work I am planning on adding/updating the user documentation / API of the dependency manager. Concerning document, we created a documents dir in the Celix sources. This can be used to write

new committer: Erjan Altena

Hi All, The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache Celix has invited Erjan Altena to become a committer and we are pleased to announce that he has accepted. Being a committer enables easier contribution to the project since there is no need to go via the patch submission process. This

Re: new committer: Erjan Altena

On a more personal note: Erjan welcome to the club :) On Wed, Feb 1, 2017 at 4:34 PM Pepijn Noltes <pepijnnol...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi All, > > The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache Celix has invited Erjan > Altena to become a committer and we are pleased to an

Re: [VOTE][RESULTS] Publish Subscribe Admin Donation

%40mail.gmail.com%3E Greetings, Pepijn > > > 2017-01-24 21:04 GMT+01:00 Pepijn Noltes <pepijnnol...@gmail.com>: > > > > > Hi All, > > > > > > The vote is closed and the results are > > > +1: > > > Roy Lenferink > > > Erjan Altena >

Re: [VOTE] Accept the Publish Subscribe Admin donation

Hi All, The legal issue has been closed, see [1]. Adding my +1 vote and closing the vote. Thanks all for voting. [1]: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CELIX-389 Greetings, Pepijn On Mon, Jan 16, 2017 at 11:04 AM Pepijn Noltes <pepijnnol...@gmail.com> wrote: > I was prepari

[VOTE][RESULTS] Publish Subscribe Admin Donation

Hi All, The vote is closed and the results are +1: Roy Lenferink Erjan Altena Gabriele Ricciardi Pepijn Noltes +0: Gerrit Binnenmars The vote has passed and I will startup the IP clearance. @Roy/Erjan: If the donation passed the IP clearance, do want/intent to maintain the code? Greetings

Re: [VOTE] Accept the Publish Subscribe Admin donation

resolved. [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LEGAL-286 On Mon, Jan 9, 2017 at 8:37 PM Pepijn Noltes <pepijnnol...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi All, > > Last month Roy mailed about a of service based publish subscribe > implementation [1] and created an issue containi

Re: Event Admin

Hi Erik, On Tue, Aug 23, 2016 at 4:17 PM wrote: > Hello All, > > As some might have noticed I have been working on the event admin for > the past week or two. I have removed all traces of APR from the > implementation and did some work to improve the implementation. I hope >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Celix version 2.0.0

ww.gnupg.org/gph/en/manual.html#AEN335 > > > > > > 2016-10-19 20:22 GMT+02:00 Miroslav Beranič <miroslav.bera...@mibesis.si > >: > > > > > Hi all, > > > > > > +1 from my side, quite happy with the proposed release. > > > > > >

[VOTE] Release Apache Celix version 2.0.0

Hi All, Finally I think we are ready for a new release :), so without further ado: This is the release vote for Apache Celix, version 2.0.0 This release solves 196 issues. Most of them bugs, some of them features. Most significantly is adds the dependency manager, support for C++ (through a C++

Re: Fw: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Celix version 2.0.0

. On Mon, Oct 24, 2016 at 8:01 PM gerritbinnenmars <gerritbinnenm...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > +1 for the release > > Verzonden vanaf mijn Samsung-apparaat > > Oorspronkelijk bericht > Van: Pepijn Noltes <pepijnnol...@gmail.com> > Datum:

[RESULT][VOTE] Release Celix version 2.0.0

Hi All, The vote has passed with the following result: +1 Gabriele Ricciardi, Bjoern Petri, Erik Jansman, Alexander Broekhuis, Pepijn Noltes (binding) +1 Miroslav Beranič, Gerrit Binnenmars (not binding) The released artifact will be moved to the release area for mirroring. A 2.0.0 tag

[VOTE] Accept the Publish Subscribe Admin donation

Hi All, Last month Roy mailed about a of service based publish subscribe implementation [1] and created an issue containing the donation [2]. Because the publish subscribe admin donation is developed outside of the ASF version control and mailing list, this donation will needs to be formally

Re: Question: Can I build celix and bundles into a single binary library ?

org/doc_2_1/group__MicroServicesCMake.html#ga5a2706d9c7ac4e3eaa1189d15e0d3e21 > > v/r > gary > > On Wed, Jan 11, 2017 at 1:15 PM, Pepijn Noltes <pepijnnol...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > Hi Gary, > > > > On Wed, Jan 11, 2017 at 8:06 AM Gary M <ga...@oedata.c

Re: Question: Can I build celix and bundles into a single binary library ?

Hi Gary, On Wed, Jan 11, 2017 at 8:06 AM Gary M wrote: > Hi, > > I've been lurking about the great celix project since its incubator days. > Great work !! > Thanks > > Now I have an opportunity to potentially use it in a production project. > > I'd like to build celix and

board report juli 2017

Hi All, It is report time again. See my proposal for the board report below. Any remarks / additions are welcome. The report should be uploaded tomorrow, so if possible a quick reply will be helpful :) Greetings, Pepijn ## Description: - dynamic service framework for C and C++. ## Issues:

Re: [DISCUSS] Celix Roadmap & Future Celix vs OSGi

ort a really minimalistic operating system, e.g. FreeRTOS, to get > > more embedded system/IoT attention > > - roadmap / release schedule for modules in Celix that are not part of > the > > current releasse (e.g. ConfigAdmin, EventAdmin, Remote services) > >

Re: Is there a Yocto-Recipe for Celix 2.0.0 available?

Hi, On Fri, Jun 16, 2017 at 7:08 PM eddi1...@gmx.net wrote: > On 16.06.2017 15:30, eddi1...@gmx.net wrote: > > Hallo, > > > > is there a yocto recipe for celix 2.0.0 available? I don't found it at > > http://layers.openembedded.org. > > > After that I tried to build the

board report may 2017

Hi All, It is report time again. See my proposal for the board report below. Any remarks / additions are welcome. Greetings, Pepijn ## Description: - OSGi framework implementation in C and C++. ## Issues: - there are no issues requiring board attention at this time ## Activity: - The

[DISCUSS] Celix Roadmap & Future Celix vs OSGi

Hi All, I took the liberty to setup a roadmap [1] for Apache Celix based on the improvement ideas. This is just an initial setup and should considered an input for discussion not a final roadmap. [1] https://github.com/apache/celix/blob/develop/documents/roadmap/roadmap.md In this roadmap I

Next Celix release

Hi All, In the last weeks we did some considerable work on improving the pubsub functionality, including pluggable serializers. This is one of the feature I wanted in the next release. Also If I am correct we currently have no open issues in coverity. All in all this is IMO a good starting point

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Celix website svn -> git

to jekyll. Saying this, I should mention that I do not have any > experience with jekyll, but I really like hugo for it's simplicity. > > So maybe your student wants to give it a try as well. > > Regards, > Bjoern > > [1] https://gohugo.io/ > > > On 02.10.2017 21:0

Re: ASF Board Report for Celix - Repeated Reminder for December 2017

Hi All, Sorry for my late reaction, but I was not sure how to react to this. Concerning the missing board report. I personally have no real good reason for this, except that it just did not have my focus. IMO the Celix project is active enough, at least from a coding point of view. The remarks

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Celix website svn -> git

needs some work. You should be able to run the build script following the instruction in the README and then browse the update site on locally on your machine. [1] https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/celix-site.git Greetings, Pepijn On Thu, Oct 12, 2017 at 9:12 PM Pepijn Noltes <pepijn

Celix board report

Hi All, It is time for the board report. See my proposal below, please feel free to comment if you are missing something. Greetings, Pepijn ## Description: - dynamic service framework for C and C++. ## Issues: - There are no issues requiring board attention at this time ## Activity:

Re: Celix board report

Hi All, I posted the board report for Celix. Greetings, Pepijn On Tue, Dec 12, 2017 at 9:46 PM Pepijn Noltes <pepijnnol...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi All, > > It is time for the board report. > See my proposal below, please feel free to comment if you are missing > som

Welcome new Apache Celix PMC member Roy Lenferink

The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache Celix has invited Roy Lenferink to become a PMC member and we are pleased to announce that he has accepted. Congratulations and welcome, Roy!

Celix board report

Hi All, It time again for the board report. Last time we were late, so this why this board report is only a month later. If there are any question or remarks, please feel free to mention them. ## Description: - Dynamic service framework for C and C++. ## Issues: - It has been a while since

Re: Celix board report

Hi All, I just posted the board report. Greetings, Pepijn On Tue, Jan 9, 2018 at 11:06 PM Roy Lenferink <lenferink...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Pepijn, > > The board report looks good to me. > > Cheers, > Roy > > 2018-01-09 21:23 GMT+01:00 Pepijn Noltes <pepi

Modern CMake

Hi All, I merged the feature/CELIX-417-cmake-refactoring to develop. With this merge the Celix project now uses a "Modern Cmake" approach. The available info of how "Modern CMake" should works is scarce, but see [1] and [2] for more info. [1] https://youtu.be/bsXLMQ6WgIk [2]

[RESULT][VOTE] Release Celix version 2.1.0

Hi All, The vote has passed with the following result: +1 Roy Lenferink, Gabriele Ricciardi, Erjan Altena, Bjoern Petri and Pepijn Noltes (binding) +1 Gerrit Binnenmars (not binding) The released artifact will be moved to the release area for mirroring. The release branch will be merged

Re: VOTE] Release Celix version 2.1.0

hem are sufficient serious > > to block the release: > > > > - android docker build seems to be broken due to zlib dependency > > - NOTICE year needs update > > > > Besides, I checked that signature+hashes are correct using > > the keys from https://dist.apache.org/repos/di

Re: Next Celix release

tion and distributed tracing should be high > > on the prio list. > > The config admin is not well usable and for service invocation tracing no > > facilities are available yet. > > > > I like the idea of positioning Celix as an elaborate microservice chassis &

Celix board report

Hi All, It is time again for the board report. If there are any question or remarks, please feel free to mention them. ## Description: - Dynamic service framework for C and C++. ## Issues: - there are no issues requiring board attention at this time ## Activity: - Three new PMC members

VOTE] Release Celix version 2.1.0

Hi All, This is the release vote for Apache Celix, version 2.1.0 This release contains various bug fixes and adds a service-based publish subscribe implementation. For a complete overview see: https://github.com/apache/celix/blob/353ac0d2e0f819f8f59d4cdf8ea1dfd701201d74/CHANGES.md Source

Re: Celix board report

Hi Roman, On Tue, Apr 10, 2018 at 11:11 PM Roman Shaposhnik <ro...@shaposhnik.org> wrote: > On Mon, Apr 9, 2018 at 12:31 PM, Pepijn Noltes <pepijnnol...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > Hi All, > > > > It is time again for the board report. > > If there are

Re: Celix board report

lly needed. Any thoughts? > -- > Regards, > Cos > > On April 11, 2018 9:52:02 PM GMT+03:00, Pepijn Noltes < > pepijnnol...@gmail.com> wrote: > >Hi Roman, > > > >On Tue, Apr 10, 2018 at 11:11 PM Roman Shaposhnik > ><ro...@shaposhnik.org> &

Celix board report

Hi All, It is time again for the board report. If there are any question or remarks, please feel free to mention them. ## Description: - Dynamic service framework for C and C++. ## Issues: - there are no issues requiring board attention at this time ## Activity: - Version 2.1.0 of Celix has

Re: Apache current-event banner

Thanks Roy, I say you also added the latest Celix release on the Celix website and added a patch to the Avro community for updating their website to include the event banner.. nice work :) Greetings, Pepijn On Tue, Apr 17, 2018 at 8:45 PM Roy Lenferink wrote: > Hi

Re: [DISCUSS] Celix site

Hi Roy, Sorry for the late reply. Great work, I think the website looks great. Clean design :). And thanks for updating the information (i.e. how to apply patches, realising, etc). Do you have any idea if (and if yes, how) we can add API (i.e. doxygen) information to the website? Greetings,

Re: [VOTE] Switch celix.a.o from svn to git

Hi Roy, Also a +1 from me. Good Work!. Greetings, Pepijn On Thu, Jan 3, 2019 at 2:20 PM erjan altena wrote: > > Hi Roy, > > Nice Work, a +1 from me. > > Regards, > Erjan > > On Thu, Jan 3, 2019 at 7:55 AM gerritbinnenmars > wrote: > > > Good work Roy. Can you have a short look at the

Re: [DISCUSS] Celix site

s, I noticed they are using doxygen as well > [1]. So maybe we can follow their approach. > I'll have a look into this as well shortly. > > - Roy > > [1] http://xerces.apache.org/xerces-c/apiDocs-3/annotated.html > > Op za 5 jan. 2019 om 12:09 schreef Pepijn Noltes : > >

[DISCUSS] C++ Celix Framework

Hi All, The last weeks I put some effort in exploring the benefits and downsides of changing the primary language of Celix from C to C++ in an experimental branch. As you probably already know Celix start around 2010 with the focus on a OSGi implementation in C; following the Java OSGi spec

Re: Converting site to Hugo

Hi Roy, Interesting, I think we started with Hugo and moved to Jekyll and are now back to Hugo. That being said I think website looks good and also the Hugo input looks understandable, so +1 from me. Thanks for picking this up ;) Greetings, Pepijn On Tue, Jul 9, 2019 at 8:55 PM Roy Lenferink

Re: Board report Celix

Hi All, I posted the board report. Greetings, Pepijn On Fri, Jul 12, 2019 at 5:47 PM erjan altena wrote: > > Also a +1 from me. > > Op do 11 jul. 2019 22:33 schreef Konstantin Boudnik : > > > +1 > > > > On July 11, 2019 12:36:50 PM PDT, Pepi

Re: [VOTE] Accept the websocket pubsub admin donation

On Thu, Aug 8, 2019 at 4:16 PM Roy Lenferink wrote: > > Hi all, > > A few days ago we received yet another code donation from Daan [1]. > This donation contains a new pubsub admin which is able to publish > and subscribe over websockets. It is using the HTTP admin service to > open the websocket

Celix 2.2.0 release

Hi All, It is time - long overdue time - to start preparing for a new Celix release. Although the current develop cycle has been quite long - more than a year - I do think we made quite some progress with Celix considering its small development team. Just to highlight a few of the major

Re: [VOTE] Accept the TCP pubsub admin donation

+1 Nice to see an other donation, thanks for bringing this to Celix Roy. On Fri, 19 Jul 2019 at 22:26, gerritbinnenmars wrote: > HelloRoy what a nice job and what an amount of code. Thanks. Although the > tcp_constants.h is self explaining I think it would be useful to have some >

Re: new committer: Idzard Hoekstra

Hi Idzard, Welcome to Celix :) Greetings, Pepijn On Tue, Oct 1, 2019 at 6:26 PM Roy Lenferink wrote: > > Hi All, > > The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache Celix > has invited Idzard Hoekstra to become a committer and we are pleased > to announce that he has accepted. > > Being a

Re: Moving Celix issue management to GitHub

com/apache/celix/milestone/1 Thanks for picking this up. I did notice the a slight increase in incoming mails ... ;) > > Op wo 25 sep. 2019 om 19:07 schreef Roy Lenferink : > > > Issue created: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-19153 > > > > Op zo 22

Re: Error when stopping resolved bundle

Hi, This should not happen and is a bug. I created an issue for this: https://github.com/apache/celix/issues/129 Greetings, Pepijn On Mon, Dec 9, 2019 at 10:45 PM Woojoong Kim wrote: > > Hi guys, > > I am trying to use Celix. > > Just I want to know how to fix an unexpected error when stopping

Re: Protected 'develop' branch for Celix

Hi Roy, On Sat, Sep 21, 2019 at 11:20 AM Roy Lenferink wrote: > > Hi all, > > I'd like to propose the idea of having the 'develop' branch for Celix > protected. > This means branch-deletion and force-pushes are not allowed anymore. > Because Celix development happens on the develop branch we

Re: new committer: Daan Fischer

Hi Daan, On Fri, Sep 20, 2019 at 7:29 PM Roy Lenferink wrote: > > Hi All, > > The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache Celix > has invited Daan Fischer to become a committer and we are pleased > to announce that he has accepted. > > Being a committer enables easier contribution to the >

Re: new committer: Roy Bulter

Hi Roy, On Fri, Sep 20, 2019 at 7:29 PM Roy Lenferink wrote: > > Hi All, > > The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache Celix > has invited Roy Bulter to become a committer and we are pleased > to announce that he has accepted. > > Being a committer enables easier contribution to the >

Re: Celix board report

Hi Roy, Looks good to me, thanks for picking this up. Greetings, Pepijn On Fri, Oct 11, 2019 at 3:56 PM Roy Lenferink wrote: > > Hi all, > > It's board report time again. If you are having any comments / feedback > feel free to address them. > If no comments are made I'll submit the report

[VOTE][RESULT] Release Celix version 2.2.0

The vote has passed with the following result: +1 Roy Bulter (binding) +1 Erjan Altena (binding) +1 Daan Fischer (binding) +1 Pepijn Noltes (binding) The released artifact will be moved to the release area for mirroring. The release branch will be merged with master and a 2.2.0 tag

Re: [VOTE] Release Celix version 2.2.0

Op 6 jan. 2020 om 21:25 heeft Pepijn Noltes het > >> volgende geschreven: > > This is the release vote for Apache Celix, version 2.2.0. > > > > It adds/fixes the following issues: > > > > ## New features: > > - PubSub TCP (donation) > > - Pu

[VOTE] Release Celix version 2.2.0

This is the release vote for Apache Celix, version 2.2.0. It adds/fixes the following issues: ## New features: - PubSub TCP (donation) - PubSub Avro bin serializer - PubSub Websocket (donation) - HTTP Admin (donation) - Shell Web UI (using HTTP Admin) ## Improvements - CELIX-438: Refactored

board report

Hi All, It is board report time again. If you have any comments/remark feel free to let us known. Pepijn == ## Description: Dynamic service framework for C and C++ ## Issues: There are no issues requiring board attention. ## Membership Data: Apache Celix

board report

Hi All, It is board report time again. If you have any comments/remark feel free to let us known. I am a bit late with the board report this time, so if there are any comments please today. Greetings, Pepijn # Celix Board Report ### ## Description: Dynamic service

Re: board report

Hi All, I posted the board report. Greetings, Pepijn On Fri, Apr 10, 2020 at 11:01 AM Pepijn Noltes wrote: > > Hi All, > > It is board report time again. If you have any comments/remark feel > free to let us known. > I am a bit late with the board report this time, s

Re: [LAZY] Use master as development branch

Hi All, +1 for me. On Thu, Apr 23, 2020 at 6:34 AM Alexander Broekhuis wrote: > > I'm not against this. But would like some more info on how we are going to > work with this. > > What is your proposal wrt feature, bugfix and release branches? > One concern I have is that last one. With a

Re: [LAZY] Send GitHub notifications to new notifications@ list (instead of dev@)

Hi Roy, Sounds good, +1. On Wed, Apr 29, 2020 at 6:58 PM Roy Lenferink wrote: > > Hi all, > > Currently all GitHub activity is sent to our dev@ list. I'd like to propose > to change this to a new > notificati...@celix.apache.org list. > > This way Celix contributors/watchers on our dev list

Re: [VOTE] Release Celix version 2.2.1

Adding +1 from me and closing the vote On Thu, May 14, 2020 at 8:39 PM Alexander Broekhuis wrote: > > Ah yes, of course. I knew that ;). Thanks for the reminder! > > Op do 14 mei 2020 om 20:03 schreef Pepijn Noltes : > > > Vote is on a commit id. After the vote passe

[VOTE] Release Celix version 2.2.1

This is the release vote for Apache Celix, version 2.2.1. It fixes the following issues: - Fixes etcdlib CMake setup to that etcdlib can be build as a separate project Source files: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/celix/celix-2.2.1/ The commit ID to be voted upon:

Re: Structs to Java

Hi Brian, The $ char is not allowed in a descriptor. I expect you need this because of Java inner classes. I created an issue for this (#223) I also cheated a bit and put your example through our companies code gen, maybe this helps in getting everything to work. Results: //RemoteExample.avdl

Re: [VOTE] Release Celix version 2.2.1

+1 (binding) on the release. > > Roy > > On 2020/05/11 17:40:46, Pepijn Noltes wrote: > > Hi Roy, > > > > Thanks for looking into this. > > I updated the checksums. > > > > Greetings, > > Pepijn > > > > On Mon, May 11, 2020 at 2:44 PM

Re: [VOTE] Release Celix version 2.2.1

er Broekhuis < > a.broekh...@gmail.com>: > > > +1 > > > > Don't see anything strange. Archive has correct hash, builds as expected. > > > > Op do 14 mei 2020 om 09:22 schreef Pepijn Noltes : > > > >> Hi Roy, > >> > >> Thanks

Re: [VOTE] Release Celix version 2.2.1

tion#sigs-and-sums for the > policy on checksums. > > Short summary: if you remove the md5 checksum and update the .sha checksum to > become .sha512 > then my -1 (binding) will become a +1 (binding). > > - Roy > > (I updated the process on the website already) >

Re: Questions

Hi Brian, On Fri, May 1, 2020 at 5:02 PM Brian Michael wrote: > > Hello, > > I was curious about some of the capabilities of Celix. In particular the RSA > and PubSub implementations. Could you inform me of the following items: > - Is Celix setup to perform PubSub between Java and C/C++? I

Celix Board report

Hi All, I posted the board report for Celix. See report below. Greetings, Pepijn ## Description: Dynamic service framework - OSGi like - for C and C++ ## Issues: There are no issues requiring board attention. ## Membership Data: Apache Celix was founded 2014-07-16 (6 years ago) There are

new committer: Michael De Lang

Hi All, The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache Celix has invited Michael De Lang to become a committer and we are pleased to announce that he has accepted. Being a committer enables easier contribution to the project since there is no need to go via the patch submission process. This

Re: new committer: Michael De Lang

And on a more personal note: Welcome Michael :) On Wed, Jul 22, 2020 at 8:49 PM Pepijn Noltes wrote: > > Hi All, > > The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache Celix > has invited Michael De Lang to become a committer and we are pleased > to announce that he has a

Re: Positioning Celix against CppMicroservices, a C++ OSGi implementation

Hi Michael, On Sat, Aug 15, 2020 at 10:41 PM Michael de Lang wrote: > > It seems we've (or at least I have) missed the already existing > CppMicroservices (https://github.com/CppMicroServices/CppMicroServices) > framework, which aims to implement OSGi for C++14. Given our current >

Celix Board report

Hi All, It is board report time again. Please let me know if you have any remarks/requests. Greetings, Pepijn ## Description: Dynamic service framework - OSGi like - for C and C++ ## Issues: There are no issues requiring board attention. ## Membership Data: Apache Celix was founded 2014-07-16

Re: Celix Board report

Hi All, I uploaded the board report. Greetings, Pepijn On Tue, Feb 9, 2021 at 8:41 PM Pepijn Noltes wrote: > > Hi All, > > It is board report time again. > Please let me know if you have any remarks/requests. > > Greetings, > Pepijn > > ## Description: > Dyna

new committer: Rick Stegeman

Hi All, The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache Celix has invited Rick Stegeman to become a committer and we are pleased to announce that he has accepted. Being a committer enables easier contribution to the project since there is no need to go via the patch submission process. This

Re: [VOTE] New committer: Rick Stegeman

21 sep. 2021 om 14:39 heeft Pepijn Noltes het > > volgende geschreven: > > > >  > > > > > > -- Forwarded message - > > From: Pepijn Noltes > > Date: Mon, 13 Sep 2021 at 15:38 > > Subject: [VOTE] New committer: Ric

Re: ABBA deadlock

On Fri, Feb 25, 2022 at 12:00 PM Peng Zheng wrote: > On 2/25/22 17:54, Pepijn Noltes wrote: > > Hi Peng, > > > > To start off, I see that some emails are directly mailed to me. I > > think for future mails these discussions can go to the celix dev > > mailing

Re: new committer: Peng Zheng

Welcome Peng :) On Tue, Mar 1, 2022 at 10:10 PM Roy Lenferink wrote: > Hi All, > > The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache Celix > has invited Peng Zheng to become a committer and we are pleased > to announce that he has accepted. > > Being a committer enables easier contribution to

  1   2   >