DO NOT REPLY [Bug 31546] - [PATCH] Serializers: bug in pop(...) of namespaces stack

2005-06-17 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31546. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

Re: CForms: a Tree widget

2005-06-17 Thread Sylvain Wallez
Upayavira wrote: Just tried on Firefox/Linux, and got 'could not find element with id files'. Is this something obvious? Got it: I forgot to commit some changes made to the BrowserUpdateTransformer. That should work now! Sylvain -- Sylvain WallezAnyware

Re: [PATCH][Gump] your definitions break Gump builds

2005-06-17 Thread David Crossley
Stefano Mazzocchi wrote: Stefan Bodewig wrote: On Thu, 16 Jun 2005, Stefano Mazzocchi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: it's not a matter of being annoyed enough (we are already!), it's the fact that cocoon needs that file at build time. Hmm, so why don't you realize that you have a typo

Re: [PATCH][Gump] your definitions break Gump builds

2005-06-17 Thread Leo Simons
On 16-06-2005 17:00, Stefan Bodewig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Thu, 16 Jun 2005, Stefano Mazzocchi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Now, I would be totally in favor of granting the gump committers commit access to the cocoon project. Should be quite trivial to add a rule to asf-authorization that

Re: [PATCH][Gump] your definitions break Gump builds

2005-06-17 Thread Sylvain Wallez
Stefano Mazzocchi wrote: Now, I would be totally in favor of granting the gump committers commit access to the cocoon project. Should be quite trivial to add a rule to asf-authorization that grants rw to @gump for just that file, at least I think it allows file-granularity. Even

Re: [PATCH][Gump] your definitions break Gump builds

2005-06-17 Thread Upayavira
Sylvain Wallez wrote: Stefano Mazzocchi wrote: Now, I would be totally in favor of granting the gump committers commit access to the cocoon project. Should be quite trivial to add a rule to asf-authorization that grants rw to @gump for just that file, at least I think it allows

Re: [PATCH][Gump] your definitions break Gump builds

2005-06-17 Thread Upayavira
Stefano Mazzocchi wrote: Stefan Bodewig wrote: On Thu, 16 Jun 2005, Stefano Mazzocchi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: it's not a matter of being annoyed enough (we are already!), it's the fact that cocoon needs that file at build time. Hmm, so why don't you realize that you have a typo in it

RE: [Cforms] Java Selection List

2005-06-17 Thread Ron van de Ven
Hi Bruno, Your last suggestion resembles how I basically have overwritten the setSelectionListBox(SelectionList) method in the Field.java source. However, I have to admit that for my problem, your first solution would have been a lot easier! Thanx, Ron -Original Message- From: Bruno

Re: [PATCH][Gump] your definitions break Gump builds

2005-06-17 Thread Leo Simons
On 17-06-2005 05:24, Stefano Mazzocchi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Should be quite trivial to add a rule to asf-authorization that grants rw to @gump for just that file, at least I think it allows file-granularity. Even better. Can we do it or is it something that infra@ has to do? All pmc

Re: [PATCH][Gump] your definitions break Gump builds

2005-06-17 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On Thu, 16 Jun 2005, Stefano Mazzocchi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Stefan Bodewig wrote: On Thu, 16 Jun 2005, Stefano Mazzocchi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: it's not a matter of being annoyed enough (we are already!), it's the fact that cocoon needs that file at build time. Hmm, so why don't

[vote] gump-related stuff

2005-06-17 Thread Stefano Mazzocchi
We should try to make it easier for gump to work with us. Our build system is a little hacky in that regard since it uses partial gump information to build cocoon. Gump strongly suggests people to move their gump descriptors over to the gump repository, so that all apache committers have access

Re: [PATCH][Gump] your definitions break Gump builds

2005-06-17 Thread Stefano Mazzocchi
Stefan Bodewig wrote: On Thu, 16 Jun 2005, Stefano Mazzocchi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Stefan Bodewig wrote: On Thu, 16 Jun 2005, Stefano Mazzocchi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: it's not a matter of being annoyed enough (we are already!), it's the fact that cocoon needs that file at build time.

Re: [docs] old docs import done

2005-06-17 Thread Bruno Dumon
On Fri, 2005-06-17 at 12:40 +0200, Bruno Dumon wrote: Hi all, The import is done, see here: http://cocoon.zones.apache.org/daisy/legacydocs All the imported docs belong to a collection called legacydocs. If a document belongs to this collection, a warning is put on top. Later this

FW: svn commit: r191131 - /cocoon/branches/BRANCH_2_1_X/src/blocks/mail/java/org/apache/cocoon/mail/transformation/SendMailTransformer.java

2005-06-17 Thread Nathaniel Alfred
Twice static final int MODE_xxx = 8 looks like copy-waste error? Cheers, Alfred. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Freitag, 17. Juni 2005 13:46 To: cvs@cocoon.apache.org Subject: svn commit: r191131 -

Re: [vote] gump-related stuff

2005-06-17 Thread Sylvain Wallez
Stefano Mazzocchi wrote: We should try to make it easier for gump to work with us. Our build system is a little hacky in that regard since it uses partial gump information to build cocoon. Gump strongly suggests people to move their gump descriptors over to the gump repository, so that all

Re: [docs] old docs import done

2005-06-17 Thread Sylvain Wallez
Bruno Dumon wrote: On Fri, 2005-06-17 at 12:40 +0200, Bruno Dumon wrote: Hi all, The import is done, see here: http://cocoon.zones.apache.org/daisy/legacydocs All the imported docs belong to a collection called legacydocs. If a document belongs to this collection, a warning is put on top.

Re: FW: svn commit: r191131 - /cocoon/branches/BRANCH_2_1_X/src/blocks/mail/java/org/apache/cocoon/mail/transformation/SendMailTransformer.java

2005-06-17 Thread Unico Hommes
It does. Thanks, I'll fix it. -- Unico Nathaniel Alfred wrote: Twice static final int MODE_xxx = 8 looks like copy-waste error? Cheers, Alfred. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Freitag, 17. Juni 2005 13:46 To: cvs@cocoon.apache.org

[GT2005] News, vote and more news

2005-06-17 Thread Steven Noels
Howdy fellow Cocoonies, lots of GetTogether news, and a call for advise. The Cocoon GetTogether will be travelling this year, in a bold and unprecedented move to check the quality of ribs across the globe. Our first stop will be in xxx Amsterdam xxx, during the first week of October. OK,

Re: svn commit: r191129 - /cocoon/trunk/blocks.properties

2005-06-17 Thread Reinhard Poetz
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Author: unico Date: Fri Jun 17 04:24:24 2005 New Revision: 191129 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=191129view=rev Log: jms dependencies changed Modified: cocoon/trunk/blocks.properties Maybe I've overlooked your commit of gump.xml, if not, blocks.properties

Re: [docs] old docs import done

2005-06-17 Thread Mark Leicester
Hi Bruno, Great! I've done a fair amount of work on the Cocoon In Action section. Should we look at merging the two, or do they have sufficiently distinct purposes to keep them separated? Helma, what do you think? Mark On 17 Jun 2005, at 14:11, Bruno Dumon wrote: On Fri, 2005-06-17 at

Re: [docs] old docs import done

2005-06-17 Thread Upayavira
Mark Leicester wrote: Hi Bruno, Great! I've done a fair amount of work on the Cocoon In Action section. Should we look at merging the two, or do they have sufficiently distinct purposes to keep them separated? Helma, what do you think? Personally, what I want to see is two sections: one for

Re: [docs] old docs import done

2005-06-17 Thread Steven Noels
On 17 Jun 2005, at 16:53, Upayavira wrote: Mark Leicester wrote: Hi Bruno, Great! I've done a fair amount of work on the Cocoon In Action section. Should we look at merging the two, or do they have sufficiently distinct purposes to keep them separated? Helma, what do you think?

Re: [docs] old docs import done

2005-06-17 Thread Upayavira
Steven Noels wrote: On 17 Jun 2005, at 16:53, Upayavira wrote: Mark Leicester wrote: Hi Bruno, Great! I've done a fair amount of work on the Cocoon In Action section. Should we look at merging the two, or do they have sufficiently distinct purposes to keep them separated? Helma, what do

Re: [GT2005] News, vote and more news

2005-06-17 Thread Ugo Cei
Il giorno 17/giu/05, alle 16:41, Steven Noels ha scritto: The Cocoon GetTogether will be travelling this year, in a bold and unprecedented move to check the quality of ribs across the globe. Our first stop will be in xxx Amsterdam xxx, during the first week of October. OK, that's hardly a

Re: [docs] old docs import done

2005-06-17 Thread Bertrand Delacretaz
Le 17 juin 05, 17:08, Upayavira a crit : ...a document detailing how the HTMLGenerator works, with all of its options, wouldn't be that useful in other parts of the documentation (other than as a link), IMO. IMHO such reference documents should have permanent and predictable short URLs,

Re: [docs] old docs import done

2005-06-17 Thread Bruno Dumon
On Fri, 2005-06-17 at 17:15 +0200, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote: Le 17 juin 05, 17:08, Upayavira a crit : ...a document detailing how the HTMLGenerator works, with all of its options, wouldn't be that useful in other parts of the documentation (other than as a link), IMO. IMHO such

Re: [GT2005] News, vote and more news

2005-06-17 Thread Andrew Savory
Hi, On 17 Jun 2005, at 15:41, Steven Noels wrote: Now, about the vote: we have rooms reserved for the entire first week of October, but need to decide on the first or last part of the week. So please indicate your preference (and reply to the dev list for easier counting): Yes, I'm

Re: [GT2005] News, vote and more news

2005-06-17 Thread Tony Collen
Ugo Cei wrote: Great news! I always wanted to visit Amsterdam, even though I loved Ghent. Yes, I'm thinking of attending the Cocoon GetTogether 2005 in Amsterdam, preferably on [+0.5] 3/4/5 October (Mon-Wed) [+0.5] 5/6/7 October (Wed-Fri) I.e. it makes no difference to me. Same

Re: svn commit: r191129 - /cocoon/trunk/blocks.properties

2005-06-17 Thread Unico Hommes
Reinhard Poetz wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Author: unico Date: Fri Jun 17 04:24:24 2005 New Revision: 191129 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=191129view=rev Log: jms dependencies changed Modified: cocoon/trunk/blocks.properties Maybe I've overlooked your commit of

RE: [GT2005] News, vote and more news

2005-06-17 Thread Arje Cahn
Presumably you're aiming for hackathon on days 12, with day 3 for the main presentations? Yes. The presentations will be on either wednesday the 5th, or friday the 7th. Also, is it worth trying to do a deal with one of the larger hotels in Amsterdam, so as many of us as possible are

Re: [docs] old docs import done

2005-06-17 Thread Bruno Dumon
On Fri, 2005-06-17 at 12:40 +0200, Bruno Dumon wrote: Hi all, The import is done, see here: http://cocoon.zones.apache.org/daisy/legacydocs All the imported docs belong to a collection called legacydocs. If a document belongs to this collection, a warning is put on top. Forgot to

Re: [docs] old docs import done

2005-06-17 Thread Bruno Dumon
On Fri, 2005-06-17 at 14:54 +0100, Mark Leicester wrote: Hi Bruno, Great! I've done a fair amount of work on the Cocoon In Action section. Should we look at merging the two, or do they have sufficiently distinct purposes to keep them separated? This is just IMHO... The parts of Cocoon In

Re: [GT2005] News, vote and more news

2005-06-17 Thread Ralph Goers
Well, I've already spoken to my boss and have tentatively worked something out with him. Mon - Wed would probably be better for me as I plan to stay a few extra days as I've never been to Europe at all, so I'll do a little sight seeing afterwards. I'd appreciate any advice regarding car

RE: [SUMMARY] [VOTE] Document Editors, and a new Committer

2005-06-17 Thread Linden H van der (MI)
I would have thought the husband and two boys were the fulltime job! Obviously, Helma has at least two full time jobs. It can be argued that she has 4 full time jobs. From personal experience having a spouse is a full time job and most certainly raising a child is a full time job.

RE: [GT2005] News, vote and more news

2005-06-17 Thread Linden H van der (MI)
Yes, I'm thinking of attending the Cocoon GetTogether 2005 in Amsterdam, preferably on [ ] 3/4/5 October (Mon-Wed) [X] 5/6/7 October (Wed-Fri) Bye, Helma

Re: [GT2005] News, vote and more news

2005-06-17 Thread Torsten Curdt
Yes, I'm thinking of attending the Cocoon GetTogether 2005 in Amsterdam, preferably on [x] 3/4/5 October (Mon-Wed) [x] 5/6/7 October (Wed-Fri) ...a weekend in amsterdam afterwards or beforehand is still a weekend in amsterdam ;) Both options are just fine! :-D cheers -- Torsten

RE: [docs] old docs import done

2005-06-17 Thread Linden H van der (MI)
Guys, When the navigation is a matter of creating a query and/or a hand-picked outline, I really don't think it is THAT important to decide now. When writing the tutorial I found it practical to keep the various steps/documents together so I could better focus on what to write and what was done.

Re: [docs] old docs import done

2005-06-17 Thread Bertrand Delacretaz
Le 17 juin 05, 17:56, Bruno Dumon a crit : ...Depends a bit on what is part of the automatically-generated docs. IMHO documentation that provides usage notes on components (thus, which is not really javadoc) should better not be maintained as javadoc... The idea, based on the summer of code

Re: [GT2005] News, vote and more news

2005-06-17 Thread Bertrand Delacretaz
Le 17 juin 05, 16:41, Steven Noels a crit : ...Yes, I'm thinking of attending the Cocoon GetTogether 2005 in Amsterdam, preferably on [+1 ] 3/4/5 October (Mon-Wed) [ +0.5] 5/6/7 October (Wed-Fri) Thanks Steven and Arj! -Bertrand smime.p7s Description: S/MIME cryptographic

iCal

2005-06-17 Thread Andrew Franz
Has anyone thought about integrating iCal with Cocoon?