Re: [VOTE] Deprecating Mesos support

2021-04-14 Thread Konstantin Knauf
ailing-list-archive.1008284.n3.nabble.com/SURVEY-Remove-Mesos-support-td45974.html > [2] https://flink.apache.org/roadmap.html#feature-radar > -- Konstantin Knauf https://twitter.com/snntrable https://github.com/knaufk

[DISCUSS] Feedback Collection Jira Bot

2021-04-23 Thread Konstantin Knauf
Nico have provided feedback that this is too aggressive). * exclude Sub-Tasks from all rules except the "stale-assigned" rule (I think, this was just an oversight in the original discussion.) Keep it coming. Cheers, Konstantin -- Konstantin Knauf https://twitter.com/snntrable https://github.com/knaufk

Re: [DISCUSS] Drop Scala Shell

2021-09-16 Thread Konstantin Knauf
a/browse/FLINK-10911 > > > > > > > > > Martijn Visser | Product Manager > > > > > > mart...@ververica.com > > > > > > <https://www.ververica.com/> > > > > > > > > > Follow us @VervericaData > > > > > > -- > > > > > > Join Flink Forward <https://flink-forward.org/> - The Apache Flink > > > Conference > > > > > > Stream Processing | Event Driven | Real Time > > > > > > > > > -- > > Best Regards > > > > Jeff Zhang > > > -- Konstantin Knauf https://twitter.com/snntrable https://github.com/knaufk

Looking for Maintainers for Flink on YARN

2021-07-29 Thread Konstantin Knauf
nt pieces of the code base, principles, assumptions, ... and hand over open threads. If you would like to take on this responsibility or can join this effort in a supporting role, please reach out! Cheers, Konstantin for the Deployment & Coordination Team at Ververica -- Konstantin K

Re: [DISCUSS] Change Default Jira Priority from "Major" to "Minor"

2021-07-29 Thread Konstantin Knauf
anks, > > Martijn > > [1] > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ShowConstantsHelp.jspa?decorator=popup#PriorityLevels > > On Wed, 28 Jul 2021 at 16:06, Konstantin Knauf wrote: > > > Hi everyone, > > > > well that escalated quickly :) Let me shar

Re: Security Vulnerabilities with Flink OpenJDK Docker Image

2021-08-02 Thread Konstantin Knauf
se issues? > 3. If not, how can we help contribute to a solution? > 4. Are there officially supported non-Debian based Flink images? > > We appreciate the insights and look forward to working with the community > on a solution. > > -- Konstantin Knauf https://twitter.com/snntrable https://github.com/knaufk

Re: Looking for Maintainers for Flink on YARN

2021-08-04 Thread Konstantin Knauf
his. > > > > Thank you~ > > > > Xintong Song > > > > > > > > On Thu, Jul 29, 2021 at 5:04 PM Márton Balassi > > > wrote: > > > > > Hi Konstantin, > > > > > > Thank you for raising this topic, our develop

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Apache Flink 1.13.3 released

2021-10-21 Thread Konstantin Knauf
> > We would like to thank all contributors of the Apache Flink community > who made this release possible! > > Regards, > Chesnay > > -- Konstantin Knauf https://twitter.com/snntrable https://github.com/knaufk

Re: [DISCUSS] Should we drop Row SerializationSchema/DeserializationSchema?

2021-10-21 Thread Konstantin Knauf
en using the DataStream > > APIs, for example to convert an input stream of JSON from Kafka to a Row > > instance. > > > > Do you have any opinions about deprecating these classes in 1.15 and then > > drop them in 1.16? Or are you using them? If yes, can you describe your > use > > case? > > > > Thank you, > > > > FG > > > > -- Konstantin Knauf https://twitter.com/snntrable https://github.com/knaufk

Re: [DISCUSS] Creating an external connector repository

2021-10-19 Thread Konstantin Knauf
lematic because > > you'd still work against the latest snapshots, and they not be > > compatible with each other. > > > > > > On 18/10/2021 15:22, Arvid Heise wrote: > > > I was actually betting on snapshots versions. What are the limits? > > > Obviously, we can only do a release of a 1.15 connector after 1.15 is > > > release. > > > > > -- Konstantin Knauf https://twitter.com/snntrable https://github.com/knaufk

Re: [DISCUSS] Creating an external connector repository

2021-10-20 Thread Konstantin Knauf
s everything ASF. More often it is > > >> "Apache Foo". It would be fatal to end up with a patchwork of projects > > >> with potentially different licenses and governance to arrive at a > > >> working Flink setup. This may mean we prioritize usabili

Re: [DISCUSS] Releasing Flink 1.13.3

2021-09-22 Thread Konstantin Knauf
rica.com > > <https://www.ververica.com/> > > > Follow us @VervericaData > > -- > > Join Flink Forward <https://flink-forward.org/> - The Apache Flink > Conference > > Stream Processing | Event Driven | Real Time > -- Konstantin Knauf https://twitter.com/snntrable https://github.com/knaufk

Re: [VOTE] Deprecate Java 8 support

2021-12-06 Thread Konstantin Knauf
like updating some e2e tests to actually run on > Java 11, performance benchmarking etc. . > > There is no set date for the removal of Java 8 support. > > We'll use the usual minimum 72h vote duration, with committers having > binding votes. > > -- Konstantin Knauf https://twitter.com/snntrable https://github.com/knaufk

Re: [DISCUSS] FLIP-200: Support Multiple Rule and Dynamic Rule Changing (Flink CEP)

2021-12-20 Thread Konstantin Knauf
side a > > > CepOperator and does not support changing the pattern dynamically. In > order > > > to reduce resource consumption and to experience shorter downtime > during > > > pattern updates, there is a growing need in the production environment > that > > > expects CEP to support having multiple patterns in one operator and to > > > support dynamically changing them. Therefore I propose to add certain > > > infrastructure as described in FLIP-200 to support these > functionalities. > > > > > > Please feel free to reply to this email thread. Looking forward to your > > > feedback! > > > > > > [1] > > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=195730308 > > > > > > Best regards, > > > > > > Yunfeng > > > > > > -- Konstantin Knauf https://twitter.com/snntrable https://github.com/knaufk

Re: [DISCUSS] GHA migration roadmap

2021-12-21 Thread Konstantin Knauf
und in case we need to > > revert > > >> - Timeframe: 1-2 weeks > > >> > > >> *Phase 5: *Removal of Azure CI leftovers > > >> - Only after we are satisfied that GHA is stable (at least 1 month > after > > >> the switch, can be longer) > > >> - Green GHA build is required from now on > > >> - Stale PRs that don't have a GHA run will have to trigger a new one > > (but > > >> they would most likely have to rebase anyway...) > > >> - (old) FlinkCIBot is disabled > > >> - Azure yamls are deleted > > >> - Azure runners are removed from machines > > >> > > >> > > >> Timing-wise, the full switch to GHA should happen during a quiet time, > > far > > >> away from a release. The remaining phases shouldn't have much impact, > > but > > >> right before a release is not a good moment, of course. > > >> Please give us your thoughts and point out anything we missed or that > > >> doesn't seem to make sense! > > >> > > >> Best, > > >> Nico > > > > > > > -- Konstantin Knauf https://twitter.com/snntrable https://github.com/knaufk

Re: [DISCUSS] Releasing Flink 1.14.3

2021-12-25 Thread Konstantin Knauf
for 1.14.1 > > > > > >> >> > >>>> > [3]. I'm including the ones that are currently > marked > > as > > > > > >> >> critical or a > > > > > >> >> > >>>> > blocker to verify if these should be included in > > Flink 1.14.1. > > > > > >> >> It would be > > > > > >> >> > >>>> > great if those that are assigned or working on one > or > > more of > > > > > >> >> these tickets > > > > > >> >> > >>>> > can give an update on its status. > > > > > >> >> > >>>> > > > > > > >> >> > >>>> > * https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-24543 > - > > > > > >> Zookeeper > > > > > >> >> connection > > > > > >> >> > >>>> > issue causes inconsistent state in Flink -> I think > > this > > > > > >> depends > > > > > >> >> on the > > > > > >> >> > >>>> > outcome of dropping Zookeeper 3.4 as was proposed on > > the Dev > > > > > >> >> mailing list > > > > > >> >> > >>>> > * https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-25027 > > - Allow > > > > > >> GC > > > > > >> >> of a > > > > > >> >> > >>>> > finished job's JobMaster before the slot timeout is > > reached > > > > > >> >> > >>>> > * https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-25022 > - > > > > > >> >> ClassLoader leak with > > > > > >> >> > >>>> > ThreadLocals on the JM when submitting a job through > > the REST > > > > > >> API > > > > > >> >> > >>>> > * https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-24789 > - > > > > > >> >> IllegalStateException > > > > > >> >> > >>>> > with CheckpointCleaner being closed already > > > > > >> >> > >>>> > * https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-24328 > > - Long > > > > > >> term > > > > > >> >> fix for > > > > > >> >> > >>>> > receiving new buffer size before network reader > > configured -> > > > > > >> >> I'm not sure > > > > > >> >> > >>>> > if this would end up in Flink 1.14.1, I think it's > > more likely > > > > > >> >> that it > > > > > >> >> > >>>> > would be Flink 1.15. Anton/Dawid, could you confirm > > this? > > > > > >> >> > >>>> > * https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-23946 > - > > > > > >> >> Application mode > > > > > >> >> > >>>> > fails fatally when being shut down -> This depends > on > > > > > >> >> > >>>> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-24038 > > and I don't > > > > > >> >> see much > > > > > >> >> > >>>> > happening there, so I also expect that this would > > move to > > > > > >> Flink > > > > > >> >> 1.15. > > > > > >> >> > >>>> > David, could you confirm? > > > > > >> >> > >>>> > * https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-22113 > - > > > > > >> UniqueKey > > > > > >> >> constraint > > > > > >> >> > >>>> > is lost with multiple sources join in SQL > > > > > >> >> > >>>> > * https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-21788 > > - Throw > > > > > >> >> > >>>> > PartitionNotFoundException if the partition file has > > been lost > > > > > >> >> for blocking > > > > > >> >> > >>>> > shuffle -> I'm also expecting that this would move > to > > Flink > > > > > >> >> 1.15, can you > > > > > >> >> > >>>> > confirm Yingjie ? > > > > > >> >> > >>>> > > > > > > >> >> > >>>> > There are quite some other tickets that I've > excluded > > from > > > > > >> this > > > > > >> >> list, > > > > > >> >> > >>>> > because they are either test instabilities or are > not > > > > > >> depending > > > > > >> >> on a Flink > > > > > >> >> > >>>> > release to be resolved. > > > > > >> >> > >>>> > > > > > > >> >> > >>>> > Note: there are quite a few test instabilities in > the > > list and > > > > > >> >> help on > > > > > >> >> > >>>> > those is always appreciated. You can check all > > unassigned > > > > > >> tickets > > > > > >> >> > >>>> > instabilities in Jira [4]. > > > > > >> >> > >>>> > > > > > > >> >> > >>>> > Are there any other open tickets that we should wait > > for? Is > > > > > >> >> there a PMC > > > > > >> >> > >>>> > member who would like to manage the release? I'm > more > > than > > > > > >> happy > > > > > >> >> to help > > > > > >> >> > >>>> > with monitoring the status of the tickets. > > > > > >> >> > >>>> > > > > > > >> >> > >>>> > Best regards, > > > > > >> >> > >>>> > > > > > > >> >> > >>>> > Martijn > > > > > >> >> > >>>> > > > > > > >> >> > >>>> > [1] > > > > > >> https://flink.apache.org/news/2021/09/29/release-1.14.0.html > > > > > >> >> > >>>> > [2] > > > > > >> >> > >>>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > >> > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20FLINK%20AND%20status%20in%20(Resolved%2C%20Closed)%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%201.14.1%20ORDER%20BY%20priority%20DESC%2C%20created%20DESC > > > > > >> >> > >>>> > [3] > > > > > >> >> > >>>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > >> > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues?jql=project%20%3D%20FLINK%20AND%20status%20in%20(Open%2C%20%22In%20Progress%22%2C%20Reopened)%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%201.14.1%20ORDER%20BY%20priority%20DESC%2C%20created%20DESC > > > > > >> >> > >>>> > > > > > > >> >> > >>>> > [4] > > > > > >> >> > >>>> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > >> > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues?jql=project%20%3D%20FLINK%20AND%20status%20in%20(Open%2C%20%22In%20Progress%22%2C%20Reopened)%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%201.14.1%20AND%20labels%20%3D%20test-stability%20AND%20assignee%20in%20(EMPTY)%20ORDER%20BY%20priority%20DESC%2C%20created%20DESC > > > > > >> >> > >>>> > > > > > > >> >> > >>>> > Martijn Visser | Product Manager > > > > > >> >> > >>>> > > > > > > >> >> > >>>> > mart...@ververica.com > > > > > >> >> > >>>> > > > > > > >> >> > >>>> > <https://www.ververica.com/> > > > > > >> >> > >>>> > > > > > > >> >> > >>>> > > > > > > >> >> > >>>> > Follow us @VervericaData > > > > > >> >> > >>>> > > > > > > >> >> > >>>> > -- > > > > > >> >> > >>>> > > > > > > >> >> > >>>> > Join Flink Forward <https://flink-forward.org/> - > > The Apache > > > > > >> >> Flink > > > > > >> >> > >>>> > Conference > > > > > >> >> > >>>> > > > > > > >> >> > >>>> > Stream Processing | Event Driven | Real Time > > > > > >> >> > >>>> > > > > > > >> >> > >>>> > > > > > >> >> > >> > > > > > >> >> > >> > > > > > >> >> > >> -- > > > > > >> >> > >> Marios > > > > > >> >> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > >> >> -- > > > > > >> >> Best, Jingsong Lee > > > > > >> >> > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > -- Konstantin Knauf https://twitter.com/snntrable https://github.com/knaufk

Re: [DISCUSS] Releasing Flink 1.14.3

2021-12-21 Thread Konstantin Knauf
>> > was released on the 29th of September [1] and so > far > > >> 107 > > >> > > >> issues > > >> > > >> >> have been > > >> > > >> >> > >>>> > resolved, including multiple blockers and critical > > >> priorities > > >> > > >> >> [2]. >

Re: [DISCUSS] FLIP-200: Support Multiple Rule and Dynamic Rule Changing (Flink CEP)

2021-12-21 Thread Konstantin Knauf
each TaskManager are consistent. > > We > > > > will describe how to deal with the Failover scenario in more detail > on > > > FLIP. > > > > > > > > Thanks for that. I think having the JobManager tell the TaskManagers > > the > > > >

Re: [DISCUSS] FLIP-203: Incremental savepoints

2021-12-20 Thread Konstantin Knauf
> Piotrek > > [1] > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLINK/FLIP-193%3A+Snapshots+ownership > [2] > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLINK/FLIP-203%3A+Incremental+savepoints#FLIP203:Incrementalsavepoints-Semantic > -- Konstantin Knauf https://twitter.com/snntrable https://github.com/knaufk

Re: [DISCUSS] FLIP-193: Snapshots ownership

2021-11-18 Thread Konstantin Knauf
gt; [1] https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/x/bIyqCw > > > -- Konstantin Knauf https://twitter.com/snntrable https://github.com/knaufk

Re: [DISCUSS] Improve the name and structure of job vertex and operator name for job

2021-11-16 Thread Konstantin Knauf
gging/metrics without losing > > >>>>>> useful > > >>>>>>>>>>>> information. > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2. introduce a tree-mode vertex description which > > >> can > > >>&g

Re: [DISCUSS] FLIP-193: Snapshots ownership

2021-11-26 Thread Konstantin Knauf
hat support "fast" copy (ideally with latency numbers). > > Regards, > Roman > > On Mon, Nov 22, 2021 at 9:24 AM Yun Gao > > wrote: > > Hi, > > Very thanks Dawid for proposing the FLIP to clarify the ownership for the > states. +1 for the overall changes since it makes the behavior clear and > provide users a determined method to finally cleanup savepoints / retained > checkpoints. > > Regarding the changes to the public interface, it seems currently the changes > are all bound > to the savepoint, but from the FLIP it seems perhaps we might also need to > support the claim declaration > for retained checkpoints like in the cli side[1] ? If so, then might it be > better to change the option name > from `execution.savepoint.restore-mode` to something like > `execution.restore-mode`? > > Best, > Yun > > > [1] > https://nightlies.apache.org/flink/flink-docs-master/docs/ops/state/checkpoints/#resuming-from-a-retained-checkpoint > > > -- > From:Konstantin Knauf > > Send Time:2021 Nov. 19 (Fri.) 16:00 > To:dev > > Subject:Re: [DISCUSS] FLIP-193: Snapshots ownership > > Hi Dawid, > > Thanks for working on this FLIP. Clarifying the differences and > guarantees around savepoints and checkpoints will make it easier and safer > for users and downstream projects and platforms to work with them. > > +1 to the changing the current (undefined) behavior when recovering from > retained checkpoints. Users can now choose between claiming and not > claiming, which I think will make the current mixed behavior obsolete. > > Cheers, > > Konstantin > > On Fri, Nov 19, 2021 at 8:19 AM Dawid Wysakowicz > > wrote: > > Hi devs, > > I'd like to bring up for a discussion a proposal to clean up ownership > of snapshots, both checkpoints and savepoints. > > The goal here is to make it clear who is responsible for deleting > checkpoints/savepoints files and when can that be done in a safe manner. > > Looking forward for your feedback! > > Best, > > Dawid > > [1] https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/x/bIyqCw > > > > -- > > Konstantin Knaufhttps://twitter.com/snntrablehttps://github.com/knaufk > > -- Konstantin Knauf https://twitter.com/snntrable https://github.com/knaufk

Re: [VOTE] FLIP-189: SQL Client Usability Improvements

2021-11-05 Thread Konstantin Knauf
gt;> > > >> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours unless there is an > objection > > >> or not enough votes. > > >> > > >> [1] > > >> > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLINK/FLIP-189%3A+SQL+Client+Usability+Improvements > > >> [2] https://lists.apache.org/thread/8d580jcqzpcbmfwqvhjso82hdd2x0461 > > >> > > >> -- > > >> Best, > > >> Sergey > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > -- Konstantin Knauf https://twitter.com/snntrable https://github.com/knaufk

Re: [ANNOUNCE] New Apache Flink Committer - Ingo Bürk

2021-12-02 Thread Konstantin Knauf
PMC, I'm very happy to announce Ingo Bürk as a > >> new > >>>>>>> Flink > >>>>>>>>> committer. > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> Ingo has started contributing to Flink since the

Re: [ANNOUNCE] New Apache Flink Committer - Matthias Pohl

2021-12-02 Thread Konstantin Knauf
>>>>>>> Matthias has worked on Flink since August last year. He helped > >> review > >>>>>> a ton > >>>>>>>> of PRs. He worked on a variety of things but most notably the > >> tracking > >>>>>> and > >>>>>>>> reporting of concurrent exceptions, fixing HA bugs and deprecating > >> and > >>>>>>>> removing our Mesos support. He actively reports issues helping > >> Flink > >>>> to > >>>>>>>> improve and he is actively engaged in Flink's MLs. > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> Please join me in congratulating Matthias for becoming a Flink > >>>>>> committer! > >>>>>>>> Cheers, > >>>>>>>> Till > >>>>>>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >> > > -- > > > > Martijn Visser | Product Manager > > > > mart...@ververica.com > > > > <https://www.ververica.com/> > > > > > > Follow us @VervericaData > > > > -- > > > > Join Flink Forward <https://flink-forward.org/> - The Apache Flink > > Conference > > > > Stream Processing | Event Driven | Real Time > > -- Konstantin Knauf https://twitter.com/snntrable https://github.com/knaufk

Re: [VOTE] FLIP-193: Snapshots ownership

2021-12-01 Thread Konstantin Knauf
; not enough votes. > > Best, > > Dawid > > [1] https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/x/bIyqCw > > [2] https://lists.apache.org/thread/zw2crf0c7t7t4cb5cwcwjpvsb3r1ovz2 > > > -- Konstantin Knauf https://twitter.com/snntrable https://github.com/knaufk

Re: [DISCUSS] FLIP-196: Source API stability guarantees

2021-12-03 Thread Konstantin Knauf
e problem of how to make sure > that APIs become stable over time. > > Looking forward to your feedback. > > [1] https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/x/IJeqCw > [2] https://lists.apache.org/thread/5jm25783oq5svyk7rr8g1gly2ooxqhjr > [3] https://lists.apache.org/thread/kzhfc3t6omzo2

Re: [DISCUSS] FLIP-197: API stability graduation process

2021-12-03 Thread Konstantin Knauf
k. > > Hopefully, we can provide our users a better experience when working with > Flink because we offer more stable APIs and make them available faster. > > [1] https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/x/J5eqCw > [2] https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/x/IJeqCw > > Che

Re: [DISCUSS] Deprecate MapR FS

2021-12-09 Thread Konstantin Knauf
moving this from Flink will slightly shrink the >> codebase and CI runtime. >> >> I'm also cross posting this to the User mailing list, in case there's >> still anyone who's using MapR. >> >> Best regards, >> >> Martijn >> >> [1] >>

Re: [DISCUSS] Immediate dedicated Flink releases for log4j vulnerability

2021-12-12 Thread Konstantin Knauf
ncy. Meaning not waiting for the next bug fix > > > releases > > > > > > >>> coming in a few weeks, but releasing asap. > > > > > > >>> The mood I perceive in the industry is pretty much panicky > over > > > this, > > >

Re: [DISCUSS] FLIP-200: Support Multiple Rule and Dynamic Rule Changing (Flink CEP)

2021-12-12 Thread Konstantin Knauf
ynamic rule changing mechanism. > > Best, > Nicholas Jiang > -- Konstantin Knauf https://twitter.com/snntrable https://github.com/knaufk

Re: [DISCUSS] FLIP-200: Support Multiple Rule and Dynamic Rule Changing (Flink CEP)

2021-12-13 Thread Konstantin Knauf
euse the Pattern concept for the > DynamicPattern renaming? > > Best, > Nicholas Jiang > > On 2021/12/13 07:45:04 Konstantin Knauf wrote: > > Thanks, Yufeng, for starting this discussion. I think this will be a very > > popular feature. I've seen a lot of users asking for this in th

Re: [DISCUSS] FLIP-200: Support Multiple Rule and Dynamic Rule Changing (Flink CEP)

2021-12-13 Thread Konstantin Knauf
> PatternProcessFunction, but the Pattern or DynamicPattern doesn't contain > the function. > > Best > Nicholas Jiang > -- Konstantin Knauf https://twitter.com/snntrable https://github.com/knaufk

Re: [DISCUSS][FLINK-24427] Hide Scala from table planner

2021-12-10 Thread Konstantin Knauf
lt;https://flink-forward.org/> - The Apache Flink > Conference > > Stream Processing | Event Driven | Real Time > > -- > > Ververica GmbH | Invalidenstrasse 115, 10115 Berlin, Germany > > -- > > Ververica GmbH > > Registered at Amtsgericht Charlottenburg: HRB 158

Re: [DISCUSS] Change Default Jira Priority from "Major" to "Minor"

2021-07-27 Thread Konstantin Knauf
onable > > > change. But I think it would be better to handle different types of > > tickets > > > respectively. For example, for bugs a default major seems to be better, > > > while for others the default shall be minor. > > > > > > Kons

[DISCUSS] Change Default Jira Priority from "Major" to "Minor"

2021-07-26 Thread Konstantin Knauf
ntin [1] https://lists.apache.org/x/list.html?dev@flink.apache.org:lte=1M: [2] https://github.com/apache/flink-jira-bot [3] https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLINK/Flink+Jira+Process#FlinkJiraProcess-TicketsPriorities -- Konstantin Knauf https://twitter.com/snntrable https://github.com/knaufk

Re: [DISCUSS] Change Default Jira Priority from "Major" to "Minor"

2021-07-28 Thread Konstantin Knauf
1 at 12:40, Yun Tang wrote: > > > Hi Konstantin, > > > > How about rename "Major" to "Normal"? We already have higher critical and > > blocker priorities, and I personally usually treat current "major" as > > "normal" priority

Re: [VOTE] Create a separate sub project for FLIP-188: flink-store

2022-01-07 Thread Konstantin Knauf
o be a subproject of flink, just -1 > > > > > > The vote will be open for at least 72 hours unless there is an > > > objection or not enough votes. > > > > > > [1] > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLINK/FLIP-188%3A+Introduce+Built-in+Dynamic+Table+Storage > > > > > > Best, > > > Jingsong > > > > > > > > -- Konstantin Knauf https://twitter.com/snntrable https://github.com/knaufk

Re: Use of JIRA fixVersion

2022-01-12 Thread Konstantin Knauf
need to be fixed > before release. So that would be the case where fixVersion is set > upfront. > > Thanks, > Thomas > > [1] > https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20Flink%20and%20fixVersion%20%3D%201.14.4%20and%20resolution%20%3D%20Unresolved%20 > [2] > h

Re: Flink native k8s integration vs. operator

2022-01-12 Thread Konstantin Knauf
reen deployment. >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > To sum this up, I'd really love if Flink could provide great out-of >>>> the box experience with standalone mode on k8s, that makes the experience >>>> as close to running / operating any other

Re: [DISCUSS] FLIP-210: Change logging level dynamically at runtime

2022-01-13 Thread Konstantin Knauf
gt; Wenhao > > > > On Tue, Jan 11, 2022 at 8:24 PM Martijn Visser > wrote: > > > > > > Hi all, > > > > > > I agree with Konstantin, this feels like a problem that shouldn't be > solved > > > via Apache Flink but via the logging ecosystem

Re: [DISCUSS] Move Flink website to privacy friendly Analytics solution

2022-01-14 Thread Konstantin Knauf
t; [5] > > Best regards, > > Martijn > https://twitter.com/MartijnVisser82 > > [1] https://privacy.apache.org/faq/committers.html > [2] https://matomo.org/ > [3] > > https://drive.google.com/file/d/1yomYhLoyrzBW620bpn_dROiwyvSCzuvt/view?usp=sharing > [4] https://github.com/MartijnVisser/matomo-analytics > [5] https://infra.apache.org/vm-for-project.html > -- Konstantin Knauf https://twitter.com/snntrable https://github.com/knaufk

[DISCUSS] Future of Per-Job Mode

2022-01-13 Thread Konstantin Knauf
heers and thank you, Konstantin -- Konstantin Knauf https://twitter.com/snntrable https://github.com/knaufk

Re: Flink native k8s integration vs. operator

2022-01-13 Thread Konstantin Knauf
allocate a new one timely. > > Thanks for sharing this, we should evaluate it as part of a proposal. > If we can optimize recovery or scaling with active resource management > then perhaps it is worth to support it through the operator. > Previously mentioned operators all rely

Re: [DISCUSS] FLIP-203: Incremental savepoints

2022-01-11 Thread Konstantin Knauf
d could be as simple as adding test coverage but that's an > active > > > decision we'd need to make. > > > > > > On Tue, Dec 21, 2021 at 7:43 AM Piotr Nowojski > > > wrote: > > > > > > > Hi Konstantin, > > > > > > > > >

Re: [DISCUSS] FLIP-210: Change logging level dynamically at runtime

2022-01-11 Thread Konstantin Knauf
t; Personally I still think that the the current capabilities are > sufficient, and I do not want us to rely on internals of the logging > backends in production code. > > On 10/01/2022 17:26, Konstantin Knauf wrote: > > Thank you for starting the discussion. Being able to change t

Re: [DISCUSS] FLIP-210: Change logging level dynamically at runtime

2022-01-10 Thread Konstantin Knauf
f96c249cbc17ce062491bfbb39d484e241ab168/storm-client/src/jvm/org/apache/storm/daemon/worker/LogConfigManager.java#L144 > [8]: > https://github.com/spring-projects/spring-boot/blob/main/spring-boot-project/spring-boot/src/main/java/org/springframework/boot/logging/LoggingSystem.java#L164 > [9]:

Re: Add libatomic1 to flink image

2022-03-11 Thread Konstantin Knauf
: > Hi Developers, > > I wish to add a new library to existing flink docker image since it’s a > dependency requirement in my processor. > Is it possible to add? > > apt-get install libatomic1 > > Thanks, > Julius > -- Konstantin Knauf https://twitter.com/snntrable https://github.com/knaufk

Re: [VOTE] Release 1.14.4, release candidate #1

2022-03-11 Thread Konstantin Knauf
v > > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release 1.14.4, release candidate #1 > > > > +1 non-binding > > > > - built from source > > - checked hashes and signatures > > - started locally and deployed wordcount / stopped with savepoint / > > restarted > > -

[RESULT] [VOTE] Release 1.14.4, release candidate #1

2022-03-11 Thread Konstantin Knauf
Hi everyone, I am pleased to announce that we have unanimously approved this release candidate: There are 5 approving votes, 3 of which are binding: - Seth Wiesman (non-binding) - Yun Tang (non-binding) - Yun Gao (binding) - Timo Walther (binding) - Konstantin Knauf (binding

Re: [DISCUSS] Preview release for Flink Kubernetes Operator

2022-03-13 Thread Konstantin Knauf
still a couple missing features that we need to iron out and we > > need to make sure we have proper documentation but after that I think it > > would be a good time for the preview release. > > > > I propose to aim for the first release candidate around the 25-27th of &g

Re: [ANNOUNCE] New PMC member: Yuan Mei

2022-03-14 Thread Konstantin Knauf
gt;> Best, > > > > > >>>>> Leonard > > > > > >>>>> > > > > > >>>>>> 2022年3月14日 下午4:09,Yangze Guo 写道: > > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>> Congratulations! > > &

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Apache Flink 1.1.4.4 released

2022-03-16 Thread Konstantin Knauf
eel packages? > > Best, > Xingbo > > Leonard Xu 于2022年3月16日周三 01:02写道: > >> Thanks a lot for being our release manager Konstantin and everyone who >> involved! >> >> Best, >> Leonard >> >> 2022年3月15日 下午9:34,Martijn Visser 写道: >> &

[ANNOUNCE] Apache Flink 1.1.4.4 released

2022-03-15 Thread Konstantin Knauf
in Jira: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12315522=12351231 We would like to thank all contributors of the Apache Flink community who made this release possible! Regards, Konstantin -- Konstantin Knauf https://twitter.com/snntrable https://github.com/knaufk

Re: Re: [DISCUSS] Future of Per-Job Mode

2022-02-16 Thread Konstantin Knauf
cations and don't have the main() > > > method. > > > For example, SQL CLI submits SQL jobs by invoking > > > `StreamExecutionEnvironment#executeAsync(StreamGraph)`. > > > How SQL Client and SQL platforms (e.g. Zeppelin) support application > > mode? &

Re: [DISCUSS] FLIP-212: Introduce Flink Kubernetes Operator

2022-02-16 Thread Konstantin Knauf
gt; wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi team, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thank you for the great feedback, > > Thomas > > > has > > > > > > > > updated > > > > > > >

Re: [DISCUSS] Release Flink 1.14.4

2022-02-25 Thread Konstantin Knauf
Best, > > Qingsheng Ren > > [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-26018 > > > On Feb 11, 2022, at 5:29 PM, Konstantin Knauf wrote: > > > > Hi everyone, > > > > what do you think about a timely Flink 1.14.4 in order to release the fix

Re: [VOTE] Release 1.13.6, release candidate #1

2022-02-16 Thread Konstantin Knauf
2022 09:30, Dawid Wysakowicz пишет: > > +1 (binding) > > > > > > - signatures OK > > - checksums OK > > - tag OK > > - PR looks good > > > > - built from sources > > > > - run example > > > > - checked dependency version chang

[RESULT] [VOTE] Release 1.13.6, release candidate #1

2022-02-16 Thread Konstantin Knauf
Hi everyone, I am pleased to announce that we have unanimously approved this release candidate: There are 4 approving votes, 3 of which are binding: - Chesnay Schepler (binding) - Dawid Wysakowicz (binding) - Anton Kalashnikov (non-binding) - Konstantin Knauf (binding) There are no disapproving

Re: [DISCUSS] Disable "Automated Checks / Review Progress" GitHub integration

2022-02-17 Thread Konstantin Knauf
Therefore, I propose to disable this bot. Please let me know if you > disagree, otherwise, I'll soon disable it. > > > Best, > Robert > > > [1]https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/18818#issuecomment-1042865516 > -- Konstantin Knauf https://twitter.com/snntrable https://github.com/knaufk

[ANNOUNCE] Apache Flink 1.13.6 released

2022-02-18 Thread Konstantin Knauf
in Jira: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12315522=12351074 We would like to thank all contributors of the Apache Flink community who made this release possible! Regards, Konstantin -- Konstantin Knauf https://twitter.com/snntrable https://github.com/knaufk

Re: [DISCUSS] Plan to externalize connectors and versioning

2022-02-18 Thread Konstantin Knauf
orward to your thoughts on this! > > Best regards, > > Martijn Visser > https://twitter.com/MartijnVisser82 > > [1] https://lists.apache.org/thread/bywh947r2f5hfocxq598zhyh06zhksrm > [2] https://lists.apache.org/thread/bk9f91o6wk66zdh353j1n7sfshh262tr > -- Konstantin Knauf https://twitter.com/snntrable https://github.com/knaufk

Re: [DISCUSS] Plan to externalize connectors and versioning

2022-02-23 Thread Konstantin Knauf
llows: > >>> > >>> 1. We wait until the Flink 1.15 release branch is cut > >>> 2. When that's done, the Elasticsearch code (including commit history) > >> from > >>> Flink's 1.15 release branch will be moved to the > >>> flink-connector-elasticsearch main branch. > >>> 3. When Flink 1.15 is released, we will also release an Elasticsearch > >>> connector for the external connector repository with version 3.0.0. > >>> 4. Bugfixes or improvements will be made first pointing to the external > >>> connector repository and will be cherry-picked back to the release-1.15 > >>> branch in the Flink core repository. > >>> 5. The Elasticsearch code, test etc will be removed from the master > >> branch > >>> in the Flink core repository and dropped with Flink 1.16 > >>> > >>> Looking forward to your thoughts on this! > >>> > >>> Best regards, > >>> > >>> Martijn Visser > >>> https://twitter.com/MartijnVisser82 > >>> > >>> [1]https://lists.apache.org/thread/bywh947r2f5hfocxq598zhyh06zhksrm > >>> [2]https://lists.apache.org/thread/bk9f91o6wk66zdh353j1n7sfshh262tr > >>> > >> > -- Konstantin Knauf https://twitter.com/snntrable https://github.com/knaufk

Re: [DISCUSS] Release Flink 1.14.4

2022-02-21 Thread Konstantin Knauf
ed > warrant > > > a speedy Flink 1.14.4 release. I would indeed also like to include > > > FLINK-26018. > > > > > > Best regards, > > > > > > Martijn > > > > > > Op vr 11 feb. 2022 om 10:29 schreef Konstantin Knauf < >

Re: [DISCUSS] Enable scala formatting check

2022-03-02 Thread Konstantin Knauf
; Ververica GmbH | Invalidenstrasse 115, 10115 Berlin, Germany > > -- > > Ververica GmbH > > Registered at Amtsgericht Charlottenburg: HRB 158244 B > > Managing Directors: Karl Anton Wehner, Holger Temme, Yip Park Tung Jason, > Jinwei (Kevin) Zhang > -- Konstantin Knauf https://twitter.com/snntrable https://github.com/knaufk

Re: Re: [ANNOUNCE] New Apache Flink Committer - Martijn Visser

2022-03-03 Thread Konstantin Knauf
ons and well deserved Martjin ! > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Best, > > > > > > > > > > > > > Leonard > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> 2022年3月4日 上午7:55,Austin Cawley-Edwards < > > > > > > austin.caw...@gmail.com > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 写道: > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > >> Congrats Martijn! > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > >> On Thu, Mar 3, 2022 at 10:50 AM Robert Metzger < > > > > > > > > rmetz...@apache.org > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> Hi everyone, > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> On behalf of the PMC, I'm very happy to announce > > > > Martijn > > > > > > > > Visser as > > > > > > > > > > a > > > > > > > > > > > > new > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> Flink committer. > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> Martijn is a very active Flink community member, > > > > driving > > > > > a > > > > > > lot > > > > > > > > of > > > > > > > > > > > > efforts > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> on the dev@flink mailing list. He also pushes > > > projects > > > > > > such as > > > > > > > > > > > > replacing > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> Google Analytics with Matomo, so that we can > generate > > > > our > > > > > > web > > > > > > > > > > > analytics > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> within the Apache Software Foundation. > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> Please join me in congratulating Martijn for > > > becoming a > > > > > > Flink > > > > > > > > > > > > committer! > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> Cheers, > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> Robert > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > > > > > > best, > > > > > > > > > > > Zhipeng > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > Best regards, > > Sergey -- Konstantin Knauf https://twitter.com/snntrable https://github.com/knaufk

Re: [ANNOUNCE] New Apache Flink Committer - David Morávek

2022-03-04 Thread Konstantin Knauf
e Beam project to Flink. > > > > > > Please join me in congratulating David for becoming a Flink committer! > > > > Cheers, > > Robert > > > -- Konstantin Knauf https://twitter.com/snntrable https://github.com/knaufk

[VOTE] Release 1.14.4, release candidate #1

2022-02-25 Thread Konstantin Knauf
com/apache/flink-web/pull/510 -- Konstantin Knauf https://twitter.com/snntrable https://github.com/knaufk

Re: [DISCUSS] Structure of the Flink Documentation (Languages & APIs)

2022-03-23 Thread Konstantin Knauf
cala-free direction means users can pick arbitrary Scala versions, not > drop the Scala API. > So the "Language Tabs" is still necessary and helpful for switching > languages. > > Best, > Jark > > [1]: > > https://nightlies.apache.org/flink/flink-docs-master/docs

Re: [DISCUSS] Structure of the Flink Documentation (Languages & APIs)

2022-03-23 Thread Konstantin Knauf
> we move more and more in a Scala-free direction. > > > > The Scala-free direction means users can pick arbitrary Scala versions, > not > > drop the Scala API. > > So the "Language Tabs" is still necessary and helpful for switching > > languages

Re: flink提交错误时报错信息不清晰

2022-03-24 Thread Konstantin Knauf
plication 写成了 yarn-appliation的话 > 就会报错 > [image: image.png] > 这里我看了代码是CliFrontend 封装的 213行的配置集合 effectiveConfiguration > 有问题,导致DefaultClusterClientServiceLoader.java:83 判断进入报错 > [image: image.png] > 我觉得这里的报错信息的描述有问题 会造成误导,是使用者误认为是自己的HADOOP_CLASSPATH 环境有问题,希望可以得到大家的回复 > --

[DISCUSS] Structure of the Flink Documentation (Languages & APIs)

2022-03-22 Thread Konstantin Knauf
h both have not been implemented, are partially contradicting each other and are generally out-of-date. I specifically don't intend to add another FLIP to this graveyard, but still reach a consensus on the high-level direction. What do you think? Cheers, Konstantin -- Konstantin Knauf https://twitter.com/snntrable https://github.com/knaufk

Re: [VOTE] Deprecate NiFi connector

2022-02-03 Thread Konstantin Knauf
sus of active committers. > > Best regards, > > Martijn Visser > https://twitter.com/MartijnVisser82 > > [1] https://lists.apache.org/thread/1vs3wmk66vsq6l4npjsfzltft4tz5tkq > -- Konstantin Knauf https://twitter.com/snntrable https://github.com/knaufk

Re: [DISCUSS] Releasing Flink 1.13.6

2022-02-04 Thread Konstantin Knauf
> > D. > > > > > > On Mon, Jan 24, 2022 at 3:24 PM Till Rohrmann > > > wrote: > > > > > > > +1 for the 1.13.6 release and thanks for volunteering Konstantin. > > > > > > > > Cheers, > > > > Till > >

Re: Re: [DISCUSS] Future of Per-Job Mode

2022-01-28 Thread Konstantin Knauf
bled by some config) distribute these, or are there some technical > > > limitations? > > > > > > For us it would be crucial to achieve the functionality we have at the > > > moment over YARN. We started to track > > > https://issues.apache.org/ji

[VOTE] Deprecate Per-Job Mode in Flink 1.15

2022-01-28 Thread Konstantin Knauf
[1] https://lists.apache.org/thread/b8g76cqgtr2c515rd1bs41vy285f317n -- Konstantin Knauf https://twitter.com/snntrable https://github.com/knaufk

Re: [VOTE] Deprecate Per-Job Mode in Flink 1.15

2022-02-01 Thread Konstantin Knauf
> > > > > On Fri 28. 1. 2022 at 17:53, Till Rohrmann > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > +1 (binding) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Cheers, > > > > > > > Till > >

[VOTE] Release 1.13.6, release candidate #1

2022-02-05 Thread Konstantin Knauf
com/apache/flink-web/pull/505 -- Konstantin Knauf https://twitter.com/snntrable https://github.com/knaufk

[RESULT] [VOTE] Deprecate Per-Job Mode

2022-02-08 Thread Konstantin Knauf
Non-Binding +1 Chenya Zhang David Moravek Gabor Somogyi Cheers, Konstantin [1] https://lists.apache.org/thread/v6oz92dfp95qcox45l0f8393089oyjv4 [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-25999 [3] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-26000 -- Konstantin Knauf https://twitter.com

Re: [VOTE] Deprecate Per-Job Mode in Flink 1.15

2022-02-08 Thread Konstantin Knauf
ntin. > > > > +1 for deprecating per-job mode in Flink 1.15, and reevaluating when to > > drop it after Flink 1.16. > > > > Thank you~ > > > > Xintong Song > > > > > > > > On Tue, Feb 1, 2022 at 5:27 PM Konstantin Knauf > wrote: >

Re: [DISCUSS] Drop Jepsen tests

2022-02-09 Thread Konstantin Knauf
nd whether we couldn't invest this time elsewhere. > > Let me know what you think. > > -- Konstantin Knauf https://twitter.com/snntrable https://github.com/knaufk

Re: Azure Pipelines are dealing with an incident, causing pipeline runs to fail

2022-02-11 Thread Konstantin Knauf
tijn > > > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, 9 Feb 2022 at 10:55, Martijn Visser < > mart...@ververica.com > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > >> Hi everyone, > > > > > >> > >

[DISCUSS] Release Flink 1.14.4

2022-02-11 Thread Konstantin Knauf
://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-26018 to be resolved. I can volunteer as release manager. Cheers, Konstantin -- Konstantin Knauf https://twitter.com/snntrable https://github.com/knaufk

Re: [DISCUSS] Future of Per-Job Mode

2022-01-21 Thread Konstantin Knauf
of the cluster resources prior to taking down the previous > job during upgrade when the goal is optimization for availability. > > Thanks, > Thomas > > [1] https://github.com/lyft/flinkk8soperator > > On Thu, Jan 13, 2022 at 12:32 AM Konstantin Knauf > wrote: > >

Re: [VOTE] FLIP-203: Incremental savepoints

2022-01-24 Thread Konstantin Knauf
ormat checkpoints, and could be done > > > completely independently of providing the native format support in > > > savepoints. > > > > > > Best, > > > Piotrek > > > > > > [1] > > > > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLINK/FLIP-203%3A+Incremental+savepoints > > > > > > -- Konstantin Knauf https://twitter.com/snntrable https://github.com/knaufk

Re: [DISCUSS] Releasing Flink 1.13.6

2022-01-24 Thread Konstantin Knauf
ttps://twitter.com/MartijnVisser82 > > [1] https://flink.apache.org/news/2021/12/16/log4j-patch-releases.html > [2] https://flink.apache.org/news/2021/10/19/release-1.13.3.html > [3] JQL filter: project = FLINK AND resolution = Fixed AND fixVersion = > 1.13.6 AND labels != test-stability

Re: [DISCUSS] FLIP-203: Incremental savepoints

2022-01-14 Thread Konstantin Knauf
ot > > (incremental checkpoint)? > > b) State Processor API - both pre-existing and what do we want to provide > > in the future > > c) Schema Evolution - both pre-existing and what do we want to provide in > > the future > > > > Best, > > Piotrek

Re: Looking for Maintainers for Flink on YARN

2022-01-26 Thread Konstantin Knauf
, 2021 at 2:22 PM 柳尘 wrote: > Thanks to Konstantin for raising this question, and to Marton and Gabor > To strengthen! > > If i can help > In order to better participate in the work, please let me know. > > the best, > cheng xingyuan > > > > 2021年7月29日 下午4:1

Re: Looking for Maintainers for Flink on YARN

2022-01-26 Thread Konstantin Knauf
On Wed, Jan 26, 2022 at 10:17 AM Konstantin Knauf wrote: > Hi everyone, > > We are seeing an increasing number of test instabilities related to YARN > [1]. Does someone in this group have the time to pick these up? The Flink > Confluence contains a guide on how to triage test inst

Re: [DISCUSS] Release Flink 1.16.3

2023-11-06 Thread Konstantin Knauf
+1. Thank you for picking it up. Yes, this will be the final bug fix for Flink 1.16. Am Mo., 6. Nov. 2023 um 03:47 Uhr schrieb Rui Fan <1996fan...@gmail.com>: > Hi all, > > I would like to discuss creating a new 1.16 patch release (1.16.3). The > last 1.16 release is over five months old, and

Re: [DISCUSS] Release 1.17.2

2023-11-06 Thread Konstantin Knauf
Thank you for picking it up! +1 Cheers, Konstantin Am Mo., 6. Nov. 2023 um 03:48 Uhr schrieb Yun Tang : > Hi all, > > I would like to discuss creating a new 1.17 patch release (1.17.2). The > last 1.17 release is near half a year old, and since then, 79 tickets have > been closed [1], of which

Re: [DISCUSS] FLIP-364: Improve the restart-strategy

2023-10-19 Thread Konstantin Knauf
Hi Rui, Thank you for this proposal and working on this. I also agree that exponential back off makes sense as a new default in general. I think restarting indefinitely (no max attempts) makes sense by default, though, but of course allowing users to change is valuable. So, overall +1. Cheers,

Re: [ANNOUNCE] The Flink Speed Center and benchmark daily run are back online

2023-10-19 Thread Konstantin Knauf
Thanks a lot for working on this! Am Do., 19. Okt. 2023 um 10:24 Uhr schrieb Zakelly Lan < zakelly@gmail.com>: > Hi everyone, > > Flink benchmarks [1] generate daily performance reports in the Apache > Flink slack channel (#flink-dev-benchmarks) to detect performance > regression [2]. Those

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Release 1.18.0, release candidate #1

2023-10-06 Thread Konstantin Knauf
Hi everyone, I've just opened a PR for the release announcement [1] and I am looking forward to reviews and feedback. Cheers, Konstantin [1] https://github.com/apache/flink-web/pull/680 Am Fr., 6. Okt. 2023 um 11:03 Uhr schrieb Sergey Nuyanzin < snuyan...@gmail.com>: > sorry for not

Re: [DISCUSS] [FLINK-32873] Add a config to allow disabling Query hints

2023-08-17 Thread Konstantin Knauf
Hi Bonnie, this makes sense to me, in particular, given that we already have this toggle for a different type of hints. Best, Konstantin Am Mi., 16. Aug. 2023 um 19:38 Uhr schrieb Bonnie Arogyam Varghese : > Hi Liu, > Options hints could be a security concern since users can override >

Re: [DISCUSS] Maintain a Calcite repository for Flink to accelerate the development for Flink SQL features

2022-04-22 Thread Konstantin Knauf
; > > > cons. > > 1. Need to maintain an additional Calcite repository > > 2. The Upgrades are a little more complicated than before > > > > Any feedback is very welcome! > > > > > > [1] > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLINK/FLIP-204%3A+Introduce+Hash+Lookup+Join > > [2] > https://github.com/apache/flink/tree/master/flink-table/flink-table-planner/src/main/java/org/apache/calcite > > [3] https://github.com/apache/drill/blob/master/pom.xml#L64 > > > > Best, > > Godfrey > > > -- Konstantin Knauf https://twitter.com/snntrable https://github.com/knaufk

Re: Alertmanager Sink Connector

2022-04-20 Thread Konstantin Knauf
; implementation around it. > > 2. In Flink 1.15, there are Async Sinks ( > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLINK/FLIP-171%3A+Async+Sink) > but not much documentation around. Also don't know if it would be > achievable to write the continuous firing logic in alertmanager > > Any

Re: [DISCUSS] FLIP-217 Support watermark alignment of source splits

2022-04-21 Thread Konstantin Knauf
. > > > > Best, > > Sebastian > > > > [1] > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLINK/FLIP-217+Support+watermark+alignment+of+source+splits > > [2] https://github.com/dawidwys/flink/tree/aligned-splits > > > -- Konstantin Knauf https://twitter.com/snntrable https://github.com/knaufk

[DISCUSS] Planning Flink 1.16

2022-04-26 Thread Konstantin Knauf
Hi everyone, With Flink 1.15 about to be released, the community has started planning & developing features for the next release, Flink 1.16. As such, I would like to start a discussion around managing this release. Specifically, Chesnay & myself would like to volunteer as release managers. Our

Re: [DISCUSS] FLIP-224: Blacklist Mechanism

2022-05-16 Thread Konstantin Knauf
t; Should we use PUT in this case? WDYT? > > Best, > Lijie > > Konstantin Knauf 于2022年5月13日周五 17:20写道: > > > Hi Lijie, > > > > wouldn't the REST API-idiomatic way for an update/replace be a PUT on the > > resource? > > > > PUT: htt

<    1   2   3   4   5   >