On Feb 8, 2008, at 11:56 AM, Donald Woods wrote:
To foster more projects to test and support Geronimo, I'd like to
float the idea of creating a new page under the Community navigation
section on our home page called -
Ready for Geronimo
The content of this page would be -
- known
Donald Woods wrote:
Along the same lines as the other discussion topic on adding a Ready
for Geronimo page under the Community section of our website...
How about we create a Powered by Geronimo page that would help
recognize the projects that provide a Geronimo based bundle (like
Liferay)
I am indifferent to whether someone is repackaging Geronimo or providing a
plugin on top of Geronimo. All I want to know is if something is running on
Geronimo (or a derivative) in production.
++Vamsi
On Feb 11, 2008 9:44 PM, Kevan Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Feb 8, 2008, at 12:40 PM,
Touche', Joe. Touche'.
On Feb 11, 2008 1:54 PM, Joe Bohn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jason Warner wrote:
Vamsi, I think that falls right in line with what I was saying in the
other thread. Take a look and see if you agree.
~Jason Warner
Which I think falls right in line with what I
On Feb 11, 2008 11:35 AM, Jarek Gawor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Here are some of my thoughts:
1) Tests and testing. We need to write more tests especially
functional tests as a group. I can list a number of cases where simple
changes caused things to break but we didn't find out about it
Vamsi, I think that falls right in line with what I was saying in the other
thread. Take a look and see if you agree.
~Jason Warner
On Feb 11, 2008 1:40 PM, Vamsavardhana Reddy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am indifferent to whether someone is repackaging Geronimo or providing a
plugin on top
On Feb 11, 2008, at 7:16 AM, Shiva Kumar H R wrote:
I went through following tutorials of JAXB XMLBeans:
a) Java Architecture for XML Binding (JAXB)
http://java.sun.com/developer/technicalArticles/WebServices/jaxb/
b) Tutorial: First Steps with XMLBeans
Hello all,
I have set up a Geronimo 2.1 server in Eclipse using the instructions given
at
http://geronimo.apache.org/developing-the-geronimo-eclipse-plugin-in-eclipse.html.
I have imported a server trunk tree as projects into my Eclipse environment,
set up a Geronimo server runtime, and point a
Sounds like a good fix to go into the 2.0.3 stream, too.
-Donald
Kevan Miller wrote:
On Feb 9, 2008, at 4:35 AM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
I thought that I knew JCA pretty well. What is a permit leak?
It's not an external JCA concept, but an internal implementation
mechanism. A permit is
Geronimo Revision: 620598 built with tests included
See the full build-1500.log file at
http://geronimo.apache.org/maven/server/binaries/trunk/20080211/build-1500.log
Download the binaries from
http://geronimo.apache.org/maven/server/binaries/trunk/20080211
[INFO] BUILD SUCCESSFUL
[INFO
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3728?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12567851#action_12567851
]
Joseph Leong commented on GERONIMO-3728:
I don't imagine there is a property
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3837?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12567835#action_12567835
]
Vamsavardhana Reddy commented on GERONIMO-3837:
---
Completed: At revision:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3802?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Joseph Leong updated GERONIMO-3802:
---
Attachment: GERONIMO-3802.patch
*Note
svn add
Hi Joseph,
Just a quick comment. If Dan is making changes to a module, it would be
better for him to leave the tests on when building. That way, the tests can
root out any issues his changes might have caused (hopefully).
~Jason Warner
On Feb 11, 2008 4:37 PM, Joseph Leong [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi Dan,
Going off what Jacek said. I recommend trying that method, it'll save you
LOTS of time and frustration with rebuilding just that module piece and
copying that piece back into your Geronimo distro.
I know that when someone first said this to me, it was a bit confusing
without the
ahhh, that's the spirit !!!
I forgot we already had it listed this under Building Geronimo, just changed
the name to match it with the release notes. Here is the link
http://cwiki.apache.org/GMOxDOC21/custom-server-assemblies.html
this puppy is all yours ;-)
Cheers!
Hernan
Jacek Laskowski
Jacek Laskowski wrote:
On Feb 11, 2008 10:57 AM, Hernan Cunico [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Back on the 5 min tutorial, I'm still having some issues deploying the app. My
latest environment is using G 2.1 RC that is currently out for a vote (Tomcat
flavor) and the GEP that I just built from
Hi BJ/Dan, I'm not aware that there can be a shorter method without providing
better integration between Eclipse and Maven, which might be possible with
m2eclipse plugin (http://m2eclipse.codehaus.org/) but I've never used it. Might
be a good exercise though, since it would certainly provide
(Pasting Donald's reply from the original thread)
On Feb 11, 2008 9:33 PM, Donald Woods [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We need to discuss introducing more dependencies on JAXB as a group
first, as this just ties more of our server code with Sun RI, which has
no alternative implementation right now
On Feb 11, 2008 10:57 AM, Hernan Cunico [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Back on the 5 min tutorial, I'm still having some issues deploying the app.
My latest environment is using G 2.1 RC that is currently out for a vote
(Tomcat flavor) and the GEP that I just built from
Dan Becker wrote:
Hello all,
I have set up a Geronimo 2.1 server in Eclipse using the instructions given
at
http://geronimo.apache.org/developing-the-geronimo-eclipse-plugin-in-eclipse.html.
I have imported a server trunk tree as projects into my Eclipse environment,
set up a Geronimo server
Joe Bohn wrote:
Donald Woods wrote:
Along the same lines as the other discussion topic on adding a Ready
for Geronimo page under the Community section of our website...
How about we create a Powered by Geronimo page that would help
recognize the projects that provide a Geronimo based
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMODEVTOOLS-277?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Tim McConnell updated GERONIMODEVTOOLS-277:
---
Fix Version/s: 2.1.0
Error referencing ejb bean from within a web
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3837?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Vamsavardhana Reddy updated GERONIMO-3837:
--
Description:
Tomcat provides an allowLinking attribute in the
Error referencing ejb bean from within a web module
---
Key: GERONIMODEVTOOLS-277
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMODEVTOOLS-277
Project: Geronimo-Devtools
Issue Type: Bug
Joe Bohn wrote:
Kevan Miller wrote:
On Feb 11, 2008, at 11:28 AM, Joe Bohn wrote:
I've downloaded these images and done a few simple tests. I've also
run a number of TCK tests with them (although I have long runs going
now to cover all the tests). So far things look very good.
One
On Feb 11, 2008, at 11:28 AM, Joe Bohn wrote:
I've downloaded these images and done a few simple tests. I've also
run a number of TCK tests with them (although I have long runs going
now to cover all the tests). So far things look very good.
One minor problem I noticed is that we are
I've downloaded these images and done a few simple tests. I've also run
a number of TCK tests with them (although I have long runs going now to
cover all the tests). So far things look very good.
One minor problem I noticed is that we are printing INFO messages to the
console. This is
Joe,
try this...
System.getProperty(org.apache.geronimo.home.dir)
-Viet
On Feb 11, 2008 10:58 AM, Joseph Leong [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Everyone,
Is there a public static variable or something globally accessible or
located where i can grab the absolute path value for where AG is
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3834?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Donald Woods updated GERONIMO-3834:
---
Affects Version/s: 2.2
2.1.1
Fix Version/s: (was: 2.1)
Geronimo Revision: 620477 built with tests included
See the full build-0800.log file at
http://geronimo.apache.org/maven/server/binaries/2.1/20080211/build-0800.log
Download the binaries from
http://geronimo.apache.org/maven/server/binaries/2.1/20080211
[INFO] BUILD SUCCESSFUL
[INFO
On Feb 11, 2008, at 3:14 AM, Shiva Kumar H R wrote:
On Feb 8, 2008 2:09 PM, David Jencks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
3a is implemented in 2.1
Is there an admin console page for this already implemented?
yes, the bottom of the plugin page. Also there's a gshell command
for it
david jencks
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3802?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Joseph Leong updated GERONIMO-3802:
---
Patch Info: [Patch Available]
In plugin installer, assembling a server, add a page at
On 12/02/2008, at 3:05 AM, Donald Woods wrote:
Gianny Damour wrote:
On 09/02/2008, at 12:43 AM, Donald Woods wrote:
- Continued work on enable full clustering of all components
Hello Donald,
Could you please list the top two components you would like to see
clustered?
JMS and DataSource
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3837?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12567826#action_12567826
]
Vamsavardhana Reddy commented on GERONIMO-3837:
---
On Feb 11, 2008 1:18 PM, Hernan Cunico [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I overlooked this one, I'll add an entry on the Developer's guide section.
Are you volunteering for this one too ;-)
Yes, I am! I'm bored with showing Geronimo's Java EE 5-only features
that other app servs do provide as well.
Joe Bohn wrote:
Donald Woods wrote:
To foster more projects to test and support Geronimo, I'd like to
float the idea of creating a new page under the Community navigation
section on our home page called -
Ready for Geronimo
The content of this page would be -
- known
Replace as much as possible of the gbean infrastructure with xbean-
reflect
Remove the necessity of specifying gbean metadata in java code
(GBeanInfo)
Replace config.ser with xml
Improve maven integration and use maven components and concepts where
possible. For instance, the
In-line below.
Joe Bohn wrote:
Donald Woods wrote:
To foster more projects to test and support Geronimo, I'd like to
float the idea of creating a new page under the Community navigation
section on our home page called -
Ready for Geronimo
The content of this page would be -
- known
Apologies for coming late to this thread. There is interest in using
myfaces within Eclipse and we are currently completing our due diligence on
the code base. The project has said that they will not be updating the DTD
files to reflect the CDDL license and I believe they understand that to be
+1 provided TCK passes.
-Donald
Kevan Miller wrote:
All,
I've prepared a 2.1 release candidate for your review and vote. I've
also prepared a 2.1.1 TxManager release candidate for review and vote.
For simplicity, I'm holding a single vote for both releases. The
Geronimo server release is
Shiva Kumar H R wrote:
On Feb 8, 2008 2:09 PM, David Jencks [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
3a is implemented in 2.1
Is there an admin console page for this already implemented?
Despite my liking for xmlbeans and its unique strengths I think a
very
Just to clarify about the deployment issues I'm getting. I think these could be
related to:
1- I don't use eclipse everyday so I'm very likely rusty
2- a refresh issue on the eclipse side, I see issues long before the actual
deployment
3- my machine has been possessed in the past :-p so don't
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3837?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12567774#action_12567774
]
Vamsavardhana Reddy commented on GERONIMO-3837:
---
This allowLinking
allowLinking
Key: GERONIMO-3837
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3837
Project: Geronimo
Issue Type: Bug
Security Level: public (Regular issues)
Components: Tomcat
Affects Versions: 2.0.2,
I think it could all be combined into a single page with different sections
like supported/certified platforms, plugins, etc.
I guess the page name will come up naturally once we figure out how to present
that info
speaking of plugins, we could try to find a way to build this info directly
Lots of ideas ;-)
some of the topics are already listed in the 2.1 doc site,
http://cwiki.apache.org/GMOxDOC21/documentation.html
I saw Vamsi adding some content to the Quick start - fast and easy development doc. Ashish Jain
sent an email with his plan for covering some of the topics, see the
I'm not sure two separate pages are the way to go with this. They're
essentially two sides of the same coin in my mind. Maybe there could be a
page that lists
things that use Geronimo in some way or another, whether it be a plugin or a
custom assembly of some sort. Sort of a one stop shop for
Kevan Miller wrote:
On Feb 11, 2008, at 11:28 AM, Joe Bohn wrote:
I've downloaded these images and done a few simple tests. I've also
run a number of TCK tests with them (although I have long runs going
now to cover all the tests). So far things look very good.
One minor problem I
Sounds like a good fix to go into the 2.0.3 stream, too.
-Donald
Kevan Miller wrote:
On Feb 9, 2008, at 4:35 AM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
I thought that I knew JCA pretty well. What is a permit leak?
It's not an external JCA concept, but an internal implementation
mechanism. A permit is
Excellent list, especially getting rid of the config.ser files.
-Donald
David Jencks wrote:
Replace as much as possible of the gbean infrastructure with xbean-reflect
Remove the necessity of specifying gbean metadata in java code (GBeanInfo)
Replace config.ser with xml
Improve maven
Donald Woods wrote:
To foster more projects to test and support Geronimo, I'd like to float
the idea of creating a new page under the Community navigation section
on our home page called -
Ready for Geronimo
The content of this page would be -
- known applications/frameworks that run on
In-line below.
Shiva Kumar H R wrote:
On Feb 8, 2008 2:09 PM, David Jencks [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
3a is implemented in 2.1
Is there an admin console page for this already implemented?
Despite my liking for xmlbeans and its unique strengths I think
Here are some of my thoughts:
1) Tests and testing. We need to write more tests especially
functional tests as a group. I can list a number of cases where simple
changes caused things to break but we didn't find out about it until a
few weeks later. I'm not talking about very complicated tests,
On Feb 11, 2008, at 8:05 AM, Donald Woods wrote:
Gianny Damour wrote:
On 09/02/2008, at 12:43 AM, Donald Woods wrote:
Agree with 1a, all of #2 and 3b.
- Creating documentation when new features go into svn instead as
an after thought when we are trying to close out a release.
-
Hi Everyone,
Is there a public static variable or something globally accessible or
located where i can grab the absolute path value for where AG is installed?
Thanks!
-Joseph leong
In-line below.
Shiva Kumar H R wrote:
I went through following tutorials of JAXB XMLBeans:
a) Java Architecture for XML Binding (JAXB)
http://java.sun.com/developer/technicalArticles/WebServices/jaxb/
b) Tutorial: First Steps with XMLBeans
some request headers may be added twice
---
Key: GERONIMO-3839
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3839
Project: Geronimo
Issue Type: Bug
Security Level: public (Regular issues)
+1 provide TCK passes
My production app still works.
Jay
Kevan Miller wrote:
All,
I've prepared a 2.1 release candidate for your review and vote. I've
also prepared a 2.1.1 TxManager release candidate for review and vote.
For simplicity, I'm holding a single vote for both releases. The
On Feb 11, 2008 12:57 PM, B.J. Reed [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Also being a Geronimo newbie, I'm sure I'm not the best to answer this,
but what I have seen work for me (and I'm sure this is the long way)
follows. After making my change to the code, I do a mvn at the trunk
level. This will
Gianny Damour wrote:
On 09/02/2008, at 12:43 AM, Donald Woods wrote:
Agree with 1a, all of #2 and 3b.
- Creating documentation when new features go into svn instead as an
after thought when we are trying to close out a release.
- Samples become a prerequisite of each new release.
-
Jason Warner wrote:
Vamsi, I think that falls right in line with what I was saying in the
other thread. Take a look and see if you agree.
~Jason Warner
Which I think falls right in line with what I said earlier in this
thread too. :-)
Joe
On Feb 11, 2008 1:40 PM, Vamsavardhana
On Feb 11, 2008, at 12:35 PM, Dan Becker wrote:
Hello all,
I have set up a Geronimo 2.1 server in Eclipse using the
instructions given
at
http://geronimo.apache.org/developing-the-geronimo-eclipse-plugin-
in-eclipse.html.
I have imported a server trunk tree as projects into my Eclipse
On Feb 11, 2008, at 8:03 AM, Donald Woods wrote:
Shiva Kumar H R wrote:
On Feb 8, 2008 2:09 PM, David Jencks [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
3a is implemented in 2.1
Is there an admin console page for this already implemented?
Despite my liking for xmlbeans and
In-line below.
Joe Bohn wrote:
Donald Woods wrote:
Along the same lines as the other discussion topic on adding a Ready
for Geronimo page under the Community section of our website...
How about we create a Powered by Geronimo page that would help
recognize the projects that provide a
In-line
Gianny Damour wrote:
On 12/02/2008, at 3:05 AM, Donald Woods wrote:
Gianny Damour wrote:
On 09/02/2008, at 12:43 AM, Donald Woods wrote:
- Continued work on enable full clustering of all components
Hello Donald,
Could you please list the top two components you would like to see
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3836?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12567700#action_12567700
]
Kevan Miller commented on GERONIMO-3836:
Interesting.
Does 'gsh' work ok under
I went through following tutorials of JAXB XMLBeans:
a) Java Architecture for XML Binding (JAXB)
http://java.sun.com/developer/technicalArticles/WebServices/jaxb/
b) Tutorial: First Steps with XMLBeans
http://xmlbeans.apache.org/documentation/tutorial_getstarted.html
Also searched for
Geronimo Revision: 620574 built with tests included
See the full build-1400.log file at
http://geronimo.apache.org/maven/server/binaries/2.1/20080211/build-1400.log
Download the binaries from
http://geronimo.apache.org/maven/server/binaries/2.1/20080211
[INFO] BUILD SUCCESSFUL
[INFO
On Feb 10, 2008, at 10:46 PM, Kevan Miller wrote:
Please review these releases and register your vote.
[ ] +1 Release Geronimo 2.1 and TxManager 2.1.1
[ ] 0 No opinion
[ ] -1 Do not release Geronimo 2.1 and TxManager 2.1.1 (please
provide rationale)
Things look good to me. Joe B said
In-line below.
Gianny Damour wrote:
On 09/02/2008, at 12:43 AM, Donald Woods wrote:
Agree with 1a, all of #2 and 3b.
- Creating documentation when new features go into svn instead as an
after thought when we are trying to close out a release.
- Samples become a prerequisite of each new
On Feb 8, 2008 3:22 PM, Manu George [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What is the point in having geronimo specific annotations? AFAIK there
is a mappedName attribute in the javaEE annotations which can be used
for mapping to server specific resource names. Is this completely
implemented in G?
Thank you Rick. Now I know from where I can reinstate a new trunk from
javamail.
++Vamsi
On Feb 11, 2008 4:15 PM, Rick McGuire [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've sort of been following the process used by the specs with the
javamail code of deleting the trunk version when a new release is
I've sort of been following the process used by the specs with the
javamail code of deleting the trunk version when a new release is
created. Once it's determined that new development or fixes need to be
made, the latest tag version should be copied back to the trunk (and the
poms updated
One value, would be when we move to Java SE 6 as the required JDK level
for Geronimo and use the JAXB implementation in the JDK, we could remove
one dependency from the server assemblies...
BUT, that would also tie us to more Sun RI and we'd have to see when
Harmony is going to provide a Java
On Feb 8, 2008, at 12:40 PM, Donald Woods wrote:
Along the same lines as the other discussion topic on adding a
Ready for Geronimo page under the Community section of our
website...
How about we create a Powered by Geronimo page that would help
recognize the projects that provide a
Vamsi/Manu,
Right place to document Tuscany integration plug-in you guys had developed.
On Feb 8, 2008 10:26 PM, Donald Woods [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
To foster more projects to test and support Geronimo, I'd like to float
the idea of creating a new page under the Community navigation section
On Feb 8, 2008 2:09 PM, David Jencks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
3a is implemented in 2.1
Is there an admin console page for this already implemented?
Despite my liking for xmlbeans and its unique strengths I think a very
strong argument can be made for moving the deployer code to jaxb.
On Feb 10, 2008 11:29 PM, Vamsavardhana Reddy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Feb 9, 2008 12:02 PM, Jacek Laskowski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Feb 7, 2008 6:58 AM, Vamsavardhana Reddy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Geronimo had a great year 2007. I don't need to re-list all our
achievements
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3834?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Donald Woods updated GERONIMO-3834:
---
Fix Version/s: (was: 2.1.1)
2.1
Kevan pulled it into 2.1.0, so
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3836?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12567727#action_12567727
]
Jacek Laskowski commented on GERONIMO-3836:
---
All's fine when I'm in
I like this list but I think we should first focus on features that
directly impact the end-user experience with G. For example,
considering the first three items on this list, the 3rd one has the
most impact on the end user and therefore in my mind it should have
higher priority then the other
memory (probably related to sessions) leak
--
Key: GERONIMO-3838
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3838
Project: Geronimo
Issue Type: Bug
Security Level: public (Regular
Another potential issue: When I shut-down the jetty6-javaee5 server
from the admin console I hit the following exceptions (I don't get these
errors from the command line or via ctrl-C):
13:23:19,474 ERROR [TcpTransportServer] Could not stop service:
tcp://0.0.0.0:61616. Reason:
84 matches
Mail list logo
