Aaron Mulder wrote, On 4/10/2006 10:33 AM:
I vote we plan to freeze on a Monday rather than a Friday, so we get
the weekend to cram in the last bits. :) I know there are a still
ton of JIRAs with my name on them for 1.1.
I'm a little worried that there have been some showstopper bugs in 1.1
Alan D. Cabrera wrote, On 3/22/2006 12:00 AM:
Jeff Turner and I will attempt to move the AMQ/SM Jira to Apache on
Thursday. It will be down intermittently on that day. We will send
an email when the work has completed.
Had some trouble w/ the current server on the LogicBlaze side
Alan D. Cabrera wrote, On 3/24/2006 9:37 AM:
Alan D. Cabrera wrote, On 3/22/2006 12:00 AM:
Jeff Turner and I will attempt to move the AMQ/SM Jira to Apache on
Thursday. It will be down intermittently on that day. We will send
an email when the work has completed.
Had some trouble w
+1
Regards,
Alan
James Strachan wrote, On 3/23/2006 3:10 PM:
+1 for the release of 4.0-RC1 :)
On 3/22/06, Hiram Chirino [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Guys,
This if the 2nd try at getting the RC1 binary released. Please take
the time to check it out and let us know if you find an issue
Aaron Mulder wrote, On 3/23/2006 7:07 AM:
On 3/23/06, Rick McGuire [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The "random Geromino" code is all part of the original bounycastle
import, I believe.
That's not entirely correct -- there's our utility classes for
encrypting passwords in
Hiram Chirino wrote, On 3/22/2006 10:54 AM:
Hi Guys,
This if the 2nd try at getting the RC1 binary released. Please take
the time to check it out and let us know if you find an issue that
would hold up a RC1 release. This should address the last set of
issues raised against the first set of
John Sisson wrote, On 3/23/2006 2:33 PM:
Aaron Mulder wrote:
Starting an e-mail thread aside from the JIRA...
I would *really* like to rename the util module. It's got our
bouncycastle import, plus some random Geronimo code dealing with
encryption and certificates.
I believe the best name
. Will this be moving all the projects at
http://jira.logicblaze.com/jira/browse/AMQ or just some of them?
On 3/22/06, Alan D. Cabrera [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jeff Turner and I will attempt to move the AMQ/SM Jira to Apache on
Thursday. It will be down intermittently on that day. We will send
John Sisson wrote:
Some questions/comments about the RC1 binary:
* The README.txt file contains many links to activemq.org. - Created
AMQ-653 with patch attached.
* etc/project.xml needs updating - Created AMQ-654
* The following should be changed to non RC versions of dependencies:
-
David Blevins wrote:
On Mar 17, 2006, at 2:18 PM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
Jacek Laskowski wrote:
2006/3/17, Prasad Kashyap [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
This will make our top level pom.xml a huge big list. Are we sure
we want to keep it structured this way ?
Hi Prasad, It looks that we're quickly
Jason Dillon wrote:
Would you then move all the code inside to the same package, as in
org.apache.geronimo.modules.kernel or
org.apache.geronimo.applications.daytrader?
Package names do not need to relate directly to Maven groupIds.
Especially not for intermediate grouping
Jacek Laskowski wrote:
2006/3/17, Prasad Kashyap [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
This will make our top level pom.xml a huge big list. Are we sure we
want to keep it structured this way ?
Hi Prasad,
It looks that we're quickly approaching Dave's idea when he had
envisioned the
Noel J. Bergman wrote:
Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
This is not a vote, but simply a discussion about the graduation of
ActiveMQ from the Incubator.
Personally, I do not consider ActiveMQ ready. And I do believe that it
should be targeting TLP status. It has its own
Noel J. Bergman wrote:
James Strachan wrote:
What other issues are there?
A number of infrastucture issues. Votes from the Incubator PMC and Geronimo
PMC. To do that responsibly, I'd say that we would want to see communities
having demonstrated that they understand
Noel J. Bergman wrote:
Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
I only see infrastructure issues in your list of concerns
that would prevent the graduation of ActiveMQ.
Look again, but also at comments from Dims, Henri and others.
At the moment, only Dims has taken the time
John Sisson wrote:
Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
This is not a vote, but simply a discussion about the graduation of
ActiveMQ from the Incubator. The status file is located here:
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/activemq/trunk/STATUS
We are proactively seeking feedback in the interest
This is not a vote, but simply a discussion about the graduation of
ActiveMQ from the Incubator. The status file is located here:
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/activemq/trunk/STATUS
We are proactively seeking feedback in the interest of graduation.
Regards,
Alan
Alan D. Cabrera wrote, On 2/23/2006 12:59 PM:
On 2/23/2006 11:32 AM, Rodent of Unusual Size wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
One question, do we need a PPMC? I think that we should start one
since this project has a very real possibility
Jacek Laskowski wrote, On 3/4/2006 5:00 PM:
Hi,
Due to a couple of bugs in Maven 2.0.2 and to move forward with our
migration to M2 it's necessary to upgrade it to today's build from
http://maven.zones.apache.org/~maven/builds/trunk/m2-20060304.19.tar.gz.
It seems to be the candidate for
I'm not sure that I like this. Consider this a technical veto.
Let us focus our efforts on a a clean m2 build, not stop gap measures
like this one listed below.
Regards,
Alan
anita kulshreshtha wrote, On 3/5/2006 6:50 PM:
Hi All,
I am afraid that I have yet another way to do an M2
anita kulshreshtha wrote, On 3/5/2006 7:40 PM:
--- "Alan D. Cabrera" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm not sure that I like this. Consider this a
technical veto.
Let us focus our efforts on a a clean m2 build, not
stop gap measures
like this
Cool!
Regards,
Alan
Greg Wilkins wrote, On 3/1/2006 11:55 PM:
All,
I'm tuning back into G after zoning out for a while
I'd like to started work on the jetty6 integration to
provide servlet 2.5
The goals of the jetty 6 integration will be:
+ 2.5 servlet API.
+ annotation support
+
On 2/24/2006 6:53 AM, Bruce Snyder wrote:
In recognition of his contributions, the Geronimo PMC has extended an
offer of committer karma to Hernan Cunico and he has accepted. Please
welcome me in congratulating Hernan for his contributions thus far and
many more to come.
Keep up the great
On 2/24/2006 6:44 AM, anita kulshreshtha wrote:
Hi,
I am trying to build G rev 380210 and openEJB rev.
2498. I am using maven -o new. During openejb build
openejb-builder is being built before openejb-core and
openejb-pkgen-builder. In other words I get
'unsatisfied dependencies' error. Do I
I think that Yoko is good to go.
ASF Infra has set up the mailing lists, SVN, and created accounts for
our new committers as well as adding the existing interested ASF
committers to the proper Unix group. I will notify the new committers
of their new accounts. There are some stragglers and
On 2/23/2006 11:32 AM, Rodent of Unusual Size wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
One question, do we need a PPMC? I think that we should start one
since this project has a very real possibility of becoming a TLP.
It's
I think that Jeff and I fixed this. Try updating both Geronimo and OpenEJB.
Regards,
Alan
On 2/22/2006 3:23 AM, Phani Madgula wrote:
Hi
I am getting this dependency link problem while building the server.
How can I resolve it?
I created the folder activecluster\activecluster\jars in
This has nothing to do w/ the byte code that's generated. It simply
turns off the debug messages. :)
Regards,
Alan
On 2/22/2006 10:05 PM, David Jencks wrote:
umm, why no debug? I have relied extensively on all of our code
including the generated corba stuff being compiled with debug.
I would create one parent issue w/ many sub-tasks, one for each module.
Regards,
Alan
On 2/21/2006 7:42 AM, Prasad Kashyap wrote:
Jacek,
JIRAs are fine as long as they all stay bunched together (using a
special keyword, maybe). Thanx for opening them for us.
After having discussed very
On 2/21/2006 12:43 PM, Rodent of Unusual Size wrote:
All incubator podlings need to have a PPMC -- podling PMC.
AFAICS, Yoko does not yet have one sorted out. So.. who
should be on it? The podling mentors, of course, but
whom else? All of the podling [initial] committers?
Works for me.
On 2/21/2006 2:54 PM, Rodent of Unusual Size wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
Works for me. I don't remember ServiceMix and ActiveMQ having a podling
PMC. How is Yoko different?
It's not; it's ActiveMQ and ServiceMix
On 2/20/2006 8:23 PM, Matt Hogstrom wrote:
I was thinking that in order to expedite getting 1.1 our the door that
it would make sense to move trunk to 1.2. Then we'll have to do the
same in the 1.0 branch. I'm going to start working on that this
week. Comments, suggestions, ?
So what is
On 2/20/2006 12:29 AM, Jacek Laskowski wrote:
2006/2/20, Alan D. Cabrera [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Does the entire system need to build using a single command for this
interim conversion? Why not have people do a
mvn install
maven new
The "mvn install" will build both mav
On 2/20/2006 3:20 AM, Gianny Damour wrote:
Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
Does the entire system need to build using a single command for this
interim conversion? Why not have people do a
mvn install
maven new
The mvn install will build both maven 1 and 2 jars. The maven
new will use the maven
On 2/17/2006 1:35 AM, Anders Hessellund Jensen wrote:
Gianny Damour wrote:
Basically, this is how I see a migration module by module working:
1. take one module;
2. write its pom.xml;
3. remove from its project.xml all the external dependencies, i.e.
the non Geronimo dependencies (they are
Davanum Srinivas wrote, On 2/17/2006 12:01 PM:
Hmm...Can we apply the same criteria to *ALL* committers (including
those listed in the status page now?)
One more question, Since Noel (as the PMC Chair) talked about
Incubator pmc sponsoring this, can we please reflect that and ask for
a ppmc
David Blevins wrote, On 2/14/2006 5:29 PM:
On Feb 14, 2006, at 5:01 PM, Dain Sundstrom wrote:
On Feb 14, 2006, at 4:30 PM, David Blevins wrote:
On Feb 14, 2006, at 4:06 PM, Dain Sundstrom wrote:
Is there an easy way to do this with m1? I'm concerned about
having two dependency lists:
. Cabrera wrote:
Do you mean component? If so, please read my reply to John Sisson.
Regards,
Alan
On 2/13/2006 10:19 AM, David Van Couvering wrote:
FYI, in Derby we solved this by adding a category called Regression
Test Failure, this is working well for us.
David
Alan D. Cabrera wrote
On 2/14/2006 3:09 AM, Anders Hessellund Jensen (Trifork) wrote:
I'd like to help migrating to maven 2.
Where to start? I suppose a good start would be to write POM's for
some of the modules. This should be fairly straightforward, at least
for modules without complex jelly usage. Should the
On 2/12/2006 1:04 PM, John Sisson wrote:
Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
On 1/25/2006 9:31 PM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
I want to add a field that marks bugs w/ a regression flag so that
we can track tests that used to pass. Currently people just exclude
the tests or, worse, comment them out
Do you mean component? If so, please read my reply to John Sisson.
Regards,
Alan
On 2/13/2006 10:19 AM, David Van Couvering wrote:
FYI, in Derby we solved this by adding a category called Regression
Test Failure, this is working well for us.
David
Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
On 1/25/2006 9
On 2/13/2006 7:15 PM, Aaron Mulder wrote:
What would folks think of (in principle, not right now) splitting out
the core Geronimo components from anything that wraps a 3rd-party
product/project? So have one area for modules like kernel, security,
core, system, etc. and a separate area for
On 2/13/2006 6:43 PM, Rodent of Unusual Size wrote:
Dain Sundstrom wrote:
Sybase wants to donate to the service-mix community
In other words, they *don't* want to contribute it to Apache.
They want it to go into a specific and particular niche *at*
Apache. Why the
Ok. Here's the proposal http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/OdeProposal.
Please feel free to comment.
Bill Flood, can you provide us with the list of Sybase developers that
wish to work on this project? Can you get the Software Grant paperwork
faxed in?
Any other ASF committers want to
On 2/10/2006 4:36 AM, Rick McGuire wrote:
Rick McGuire wrote:
I've been going crazy the last couple of hours trying to figure out
why the Geronimo JAF code was not successfully loading the
META-INF/mailcap file contained in the javamail spec jar. Finally, I
cracked the jar open to verify
Applied and commited. You need me to deploy these puppies?
Regards,
Alan
On 2/10/2006 10:48 AM, David Blevins wrote:
Hey Alan,
I broke part of the axis build by checking in the javamail and
activation jars from geronimo. Rick has fixed it in GERONIMO-1619
and GERONIMO-1618. You've
Uploaded
Regards,
Alan
On 2/10/2006 12:12 PM, David Blevins wrote:
Yes Sir, Thank You Sir!
Let me know when they're up and I'll check those puppies into Axis scm.
-David
On Feb 10, 2006, at 11:48 AM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
Applied and commited. You need me to deploy these puppies
On 2/8/2006 7:27 PM, Roy T. Fielding wrote:
ALL incubator requests for infrastructure MUST be reflected in an
appropriate status file under
http://incubator.apache.org/projects/index.html
before they are requested. There are no exceptions.
Roy
I shall do this.
Regards,
Alan
I think I need:
SVN
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/yoko
Jira
Mailing lists
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Regards,
Alan
On 2/8/2006 5:50 PM, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
Alan,
Please note that this is not a Geronimo sub-project. Incubator projects are
just that: Incubator projects whose final destination will be determined at
graduation.
Amongst other issues, we want to be inviting and inclusive of whomever wants
On 2/8/2006 5:41 PM, Rodent of Unusual Size wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
I think I need:
* SVN
o http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/yoko
* Jira
* Mailing lists
o [EMAIL PROTECTED]
o
It seems that the ASF Jira is now wired up into SVN in such a way that
if you put the issue # into your checkin comment, it will automatically
be linked into that issue. Note the Subversion Commits tab.
Regards,
Alan
GERONIMO-1587
Document versioning process
Regards,
Alan
On 2/4/2006 2:08 PM, Dain Sundstrom wrote:
Alan, can you document our spec jar versioning policy on the wiki
somewhere. I remember us discussing this a while back, I just don't
want to lose our reasoning :)
Thanks,
-dain
On Feb
Cc'ing the incubator list since Dims is no longer on the Geronimo and
ServiceMix lists.
Regards,
Alan
On 2/3/2006 2:05 PM, Aaron Mulder wrote:
Holy crap! What a mess this thread is! I'm not used to being like
the cool voice of reason. :)
For my 2 cents, a JBI container without BPEL is a
Let me jump in here and say that I have to agree w/ Dims, Noel, et al
here.
We should be focusing on a good vendor experience not wrangling with
new and "improved" ways to extend the incubation process, i.e.
incubating under an incubating sub-project. To be frank, our new
guests are
Cc'ing the incubator list since Dims is no longer on the Geronimo and
ServiceMix lists.
Regards,
Alan
On 2/3/2006 2:05 PM, Aaron Mulder wrote:
Holy crap! What a mess this thread is! I'm not used to being like
the cool voice of reason. :)
For my 2 cents, a JBI container without BPEL is a
On 2/3/2006 2:49 PM, Jason Dillon wrote:
Why aren't the spec jars for 1.0 published to the Maven 1 central repo
in addition to the central Maven 2 repo?
They seem to be in
http://cvs.apache.org/repository/org.apache.geronimo.specs/jars/.
Regards,
Alan
On 2/3/2006 2:57 PM, David Blevins wrote:
On Feb 3, 2006, at 2:49 PM, Jason Dillon wrote:
Why aren't the spec jars for 1.0 published to the Maven 1 central repo
in addition to the central Maven 2 repo?
fyi, http://www.apache.org/dist/java-repository/
org.apache.geronimo.specs/jars/
Uh
to
ibiblio.
- Brett
On 2/4/06, Alan D. Cabrera [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 2/3/2006 2:57 PM, David Blevins wrote:
On Feb 3, 2006, at 2:49 PM, Jason Dillon wrote:
Why aren't the spec jars for 1.0 published to the Maven 1 central repo
in addition to the central Maven 2 repo
On 1/31/2006 8:23 PM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
Noel J. Bergman wrote, On 1/31/2006 7:27 PM:
Alan,
Could you folks turn up some additional Mentors? We have not adopted
a formal policy to require more than one --- yet --- but I'd like to
see more than one.
Sure, good idea.
The only
If I understand correctly, this will be a code donation like
http://incubator.apache.org/ip-clearance/geronimo-762-ibm-console.html.
Regards,
Alan
On 2/2/2006 1:12 PM, Davanum Srinivas wrote:
Cory,
Could you please get James' help and draft a complete proposal?
Please see
On 2/2/2006 9:40 AM, Kevan Miller wrote:
On Feb 2, 2006, at 12:20 PM, xandrew wrote:
Can I build Geronimo with Maven2?
No, not yet. I'm not aware of anyone actively working on it, but it
is something we want to move to...
We will never swallow m2 whole. We need to gobble little bits
[X] +1 Document issue in release notes and defer fix to 1.1
Regards,
Alan
On 2/2/2006 2:10 PM, Dain Sundstrom wrote:
On Feb 2, 2006, at 1:17 PM, David Jencks wrote:
I may sound snippy here, in which case I apologize. However, I
haven't seen anything that I consider realistic planning for getting
this into 1.0.1. The proposals (mostly dain's) that I have seen
Sounds good.
Regards,
Alan
Aaron Mulder wrote, On 2/2/2006 4:38 PM:
Just to update, on IRC there is a discussion featuring the option of
changing the 1.0 branch to become 1.1 and fixing the configId stuff
properly and permanently there (and of course merging it to HEAD,
which would become 1.2
This sounds like a good idea.
Regards,
Alan
David Jencks wrote, On 2/2/2006 6:42 PM:
After a long discussion on IRC we may have a proposal for the configId
dilemma.
People: Dain and I will work to implement this
Timeframe: for the next week, then we will see where we are
svn tags: we'll
Because it's a great technology that would make my life easier. I
encourage you to read the website for more details on the nifty things
that it does.
Regards,
Alan
Geir Magnusson Jr wrote, On 2/1/2006 7:53 AM:
I asked a while ago and I think my question was never answered -
why bring
Geir Magnusson Jr wrote, On 2/1/2006 8:24 AM:
I was sick and traveling the past few days, so I missed the whole vote.
I'm not necessarily against it, but worried about pointless growth - my
only question is why bring this in? It's good code and all, but
normally we try to draw some line
Rodent of Unusual Size wrote, On 2/1/2006 8:06 AM:
Dain Sundstrom wrote:
Vote passed with:
+1 Jeff Genender, Alan Cabrera, Sachin Patel, Dain Sundstrom, David
Blevins, Andy Piper, Aaron Mulder, Davanum Srinivas, Jacek Laskowski,
Bruce Snyder, Jason Dillion, Gianny Damour, John Sission,
Results of the vote [1] on Yoko - A CORBA Server sub-project proposal [2]:
+1 David Blevins
+1 Jacek Laskowski
+1 John Sisson
+1 Alan Cabrera
+1 Jeff Genender
+1 Davanum Srinivas
+1 Matt Hogstrom
+1 David Jencks
+1 Dain Sundstrom
+1 Bruce Snyder
+1 Greg Wilkins
+1 Jan Bartel
+1
Noel J. Bergman wrote, On 1/31/2006 7:27 PM:
Alan,
Could you folks turn up some additional Mentors? We have not adopted a formal
policy to require more than one --- yet --- but I'd like to see more than one.
Sure, good idea.
Regards,
Alan
On 1/29/2006 1:41 PM, David Blevins wrote:
On Jan 28, 2006, at 11:51 AM, David Jencks wrote:
On Jan 28, 2006, at 10:57 AM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
I've updated the trunk of Geronimo Specs to 1.1-SNAPSHOT. The
thinking is that we update the versions of all the spec jars in
tandem
On 1/30/2006 11:07 AM, David Blevins wrote:
On Jan 30, 2006, at 8:44 AM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
Think of what the alternative is that you are asking the end
developer to cope w/. He must grok what is the current correct
collection of versions are. Even if all the APIs mature
I've updated the trunk of Geronimo Specs to 1.1-SNAPSHOT. The thinking
is that we update the versions of all the spec jars in tandem. The
rational for that is that end developers will not want to pick and
choose what got updated in our collection of spec jars but, instead,
will just want the
On 1/27/2006 12:08 PM, Dain Sundstrom wrote:
The XBean project has voted to donate all of the code located at
https://svn.codehaus.org/xbean (view with fisheye http://
cvs.codehaus.org/viewrep/xbean) to Apache Geronimo. The completed IP
clearance check list can be found here
+1
Regards,
Alan
On 1/25/2006 11:37 AM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
= PROJECT PROPOSAL =
Yoko, a CORBA Server.
This proposal outlines the creation of a Geronimo sub-project within
the Apache Software Foundation.
= RATIONALE =
The current Apache Geronimo project (http://geronimo.apache.org
A few of us are working on a project, LiveTribe, that does service
provisioning/configuration, management, and monitoring. One of the
things that we are actively working on is adding application response
monitoring using the ARM standard to Geronimo. Soon you will see this
in ServiceMix,
/me grumbles about this being a vote...
On 1/25/2006 12:20 PM, David Jencks wrote:
Could you correct the spelling of schema and add at least the apache
emails of the committers missing emails? Mine is [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Fixed on wiki.
What is the relationship between this and the trifork
.
-David
On Jan 25, 2006, at 11:37 AM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
= PROJECT PROPOSAL =
Yoko, a CORBA Server.
This proposal outlines the creation of a Geronimo sub-project within
the Apache Software Foundation.
= RATIONALE =
The current Apache Geronimo project (http://geronimo.apache.org
On 1/25/2006 1:22 PM, Jacek Laskowski wrote:
2006/1/25, Alan D. Cabrera [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
= PROJECT PROPOSAL =
Yoko, a CORBA Server.
Hi Alan,
As Dave stated, you're the clever men alive! I wish I had found it out
myself! ;) I like the name very much!
A set
On 1/24/2006 11:52 AM, Aaron Mulder wrote:
[X] Change all configIds to 1.0 even though it's the 1.0.1 release
[ ] Change all references to use no version and make that work
[ ] Something else (please explain)
Regards,
Alan
I want to add a field that marks bugs w/ a regression flag so that we
can track tests that used to pass. Currently people just exclude the
tests or, worse, comment them out in the code.
Thoughts?
Regards,
Alan
Aaron Mulder wrote, On 1/24/2006 11:52 AM:
All,
There was some IRC talk but not a lot of list response to the configId
versioning issue. Right now, it's kind of holding up 1.0.1 IMHO
because I can't support releasing 1.0.1 until we resolve the
compatibility issue somehow, and there's going to
Anders Hessellund Jensen (Trifork) wrote, On 1/21/2006 5:09 AM:
Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
Its name isn't CORBA Server. It is being characterized as a CORBA
server, which IIUC is perfectly legal.
I understand it differently. In the Proper usage of OMG trademarks and
logos section
[X] Confluence
The integration w/ Jira is great!
Regards,
Alan
On 1/20/2006 4:57 AM, Anders Hessellund Jensen wrote:
Trieloff, Carl wrote:
One thing I just realized is that we don't want the sub-project to
show up as being called CORBA Server. CORBA is trademarked by the OMG
and that would be an infringement. Thus we can't use CORBA in the name
of the
Anders Hessellund Jensen wrote, On 1/19/2006 7:48 AM:
Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
Here is the incubation proposal
http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/CorbaProposal
Does anyone have any comments before we vote on it?
There is a half-finished sentence in the document. In the Initial
Source section
PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, January 19, 2006 10:48 AM
To: dev@geronimo.apache.org
Subject: Re: CORBA incubation proposal
Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
Here is the incubation proposal
http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/CorbaProposal
Does anyone have any comments before we vote on it?
There is a half-finished
? If not, is this standard practice for
granting commit and does this mean they are granted commit to the
entrire Geronimo dev tree?
Thanks for the follow up.
Matt
Rick McGuire wrote:
Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
Here is the incubation proposal
http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/CorbaProposal
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote, On 1/17/2006 7:50 AM:
I started refactoring login service along the lines discussed with Alan, David,
and others at the apachecon. This includes simplifying login service, and
authentication by assertion, delegation principals. David J, I know that you
want pluggable
Here is the incubation proposal
http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/CorbaProposal
Does anyone have any comments before we vote on it?
Should this also get sent to the incubator list or do we wait until
after the vote?
Alex Karasulu and I were talking about it and we both think that it
might
That would be great.
Regards,
Alan
Matt Hogstrom wrote, On 1/18/2006 6:29 PM:
Are there any people on the Harmony project that might (are) interested
in an ORB? Seems like prime territory for them.
Otherwise it looks good.
Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
Here is the incubation proposal
http
That would be great.
Regards,
Alan
Matt Hogstrom wrote, On 1/18/2006 6:29 PM:
Are there any people on the Harmony project that might (are) interested
in an ORB? Seems like prime territory for them.
Otherwise it looks good.
Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
Here is the incubation proposal
http
Jacek Laskowski wrote, On 1/16/2006 2:11 AM:
2006/1/15, Alan D. Cabrera [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I propose that we move the sandbox to geronimo/sandbox.
+1. When could it be moved? Also, I wonder about the etc/ stuff. How
should sandbox projects reference project.xml? Will Maven 2 help us
I am of the strong opinion of releasing new features in a patch release
is a bad idea. This should go in 1.1.0. I think that we should feature
freeze 1.1.0 at the end of this month.
Regards,
Alan
Jules Gosnell wrote, On 1/16/2006 3:01 AM:
Here is my penniesworth :
Users want clustering -
Matt Hogstrom wrote, On 1/14/2006 9:02 PM:
I've seen several posts about the upcoming 1.0.x release and 1.1 and 2.0
etc. lately and I think its great that we're having these discussions.
I'd like to use this thread to aggregate people's thoughts about this
topic in a single thread for
Greg Wilkins wrote, On 1/15/2006 4:21 AM:
I would like to create a dev branch to start working on some
1.1 and 2.0 stuff.
But I don't think it is appropriate to pollute /branch with
private branches as it will be good to be able to go there and see
all the official branches:
/branch/1.0
/me blows coffee all over his keyboard
Jeff Genender wrote, On 1/13/2006 5:52 AM:
Huh??? Aaron has a Mac??? ;-)
Aaron Mulder wrote:
I had the problem on my Mac.
Aaron
On 1/13/06, John Sisson (JIRA) dev@geronimo.apache.org wrote:
[
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote, On 1/13/2006 11:51 AM:
With regard to clustering, I also want to mention a remote option, which
is to use infiniband RDMA for inter-node communication.
With an infiniband link between two machines you can copy a buffer
directly from the memory of one to the memory of
[X] Re-version the initial release to 1.0.0
[ ] Leave it at 0.5.0
[ ] Doesn't matter
Regards,
Alan
501 - 600 of 914 matches
Mail list logo
