A request was sent to the PMC to add a book to the website. I have
created a patch for this and tested the changes.
See http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2122 for details and
patch for for site\trunk and site\branches\may2006.
Here's my +1, can I get 3 more?
Thanks,
John
David Blevins wrote:
Everyone, please read and ACK.
On Jun 14, 2006, at 4:31 PM, John Sisson wrote:
Hiram, I care if a private or commercial entity has control over the
default option.
I think Hiram does too, he just a read a little too fast. His
thoughts are clear though.
On Jun 14
documentation changes required voting.
I wonder if it would be reasonable to indicate which version(s) of
geronimo a book is primarily focussed on?
thanks
david jencks
On Jun 14, 2006, at 8:49 PM, John Sisson wrote:
A request was sent to the PMC to add a book to the website. I have
created
+1 . How about having sandbox as part of the name of the Project or
Component so it is clear to users what the status of the project is.
John
Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
Well, who can argue with that line of reasoning. :)
Now that I think of it, if making a Jira project helps build a
community
Some notes in relation to documentation:
* Clicking on the the Geronimo Documentation link on
http://myhost:8080/ takes me to
http://geronimo.apache.org/documentation.html which doesn't currently
have any 1.1 documentation. What are the plans for the 1.1 documentation?
* Clicking on the
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: hogstrom
Date: Fri Jun 16 19:58:59 2006
New Revision: 414988
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=414988view=rev
Log:
Updated release notes with known issues.
Is it a good idea having a 5 known issues in the release notes when
there are plenty more in
Are the licenses displayed in the console in the about page (
http://localhost:8080/console/about.jsp ) meant to represent the whole
of Geronimo, or just the console?
Currently the licenses displayed there are a subset of those in
Geronimo's LICENSE.txt file.
John
Matt Hogstrom wrote:
All,
I have created what I hope is the final release of Geronimo 1.1.
There has been a lot of work that has gone into this release (please
review the RELEASE-NOTES). Here are the final release candidates for
your review.
*DayTrader Application*
why we shouldn't have a src distribution for DayTrader.
I'll vote when I can see it working.
Thanks,
John
John Sisson wrote:
Matt Hogstrom wrote:
All,
I have created what I hope is the final release of Geronimo 1.1.
There has been a lot of work that has gone into this release (please
+1 (assuming TCK tests pass).
John
Matt Hogstrom wrote:
All,
I have created what I hope is the final release of Geronimo 1.1.
There has been a lot of work that has gone into this release (please
review the RELEASE-NOTES). Here are the final release candidates for
your review.
of this release candidate.
Thanks to all that have been checking this out. John Sisson
especially has been burning the midnight oil and finding the
remaining issues that have helped to improve the quality of this
release.
*Geronimo 1.1 Version*
*Source*
http://people.apache.org/~hogstrom
+1
John
Matt Hogstrom wrote:
Thanks John. I can respin these. Since I don't have to rebuild the
server I would like to put out the new files and continue the vote.
Does this sound good to everyone ?
John Sisson wrote:
-1 - There are some licensing and packaging issues. See in-line
Well deserved. Congratulations!
John
Sachin Patel wrote:
In recognition of his contributions to the Apache Geronimo community,
the Geronimo PMC is proud to announce the committership of Joe Bohn.
Joe has contributed in many areas, including the console and as of
recent, the work on our
Matt Hogstrom wrote:
The corrections applied due to license files are first in this list.
Thanks to John for dogging this.
The distributions and builds were not affected. Based on previous
feedback the vote continues. Thanks for your feedback.
*Geronimo 1.1 Version*
*Source*
The Derby library we are using in Geronimo does not have line number
debug information, which is useful in stack traces.
This has been addressed in the upcoming Derby 10.1.3 release by
providing a lib-debug distribution (
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-178 ) .
I'll raise a JIRA
+1 to release.
John
Matt Hogstrom wrote:
Here is the current status of voting.
I know we've had several issues we had to work through wrt to licenses
and other issues that have caused some respins. At this point I think
we're green for the release. Please take a few minutes to cast your
Dain Sundstrom wrote:
On Jun 16, 2006, at 2:35 PM, David Jencks wrote:
--- Dain Sundstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have two thoughts:
1) we have an automated tool to track patches and it
can track votes
and send out these reports.
I'm not convinced automating this will work all that
+1 to David's recap and to Matts plans below.
John
Matt Hogstrom wrote:
Thanks David, I tried to recap in the other thread and didn't receive
any additional responses so now that we have a branches/1.1.0
branches/1.1 and a branches/1.1.1 I don't think we quite nailed it.
Your summary is
Matt Hogstrom wrote:
A few days ago I had made a comment about Open for g-Business. Any
thoughts as to whether we should actually make this the server started
message? I don't know if this would be considered conflicting with
IBM's Open for e-Business message but I like the ring.
Thoughts?
Hi Simon,
Can you try appending the -e maven option to your maven command, so
exceptions are displayed.
If after specifying the -e option you see it is an OutOfMemoryError,
then try setting the MAVEN_OPTS environment variable to:
-Xmx512m -XX:MaxPermSize=128m
If it was something else,
After looking more closely at your error, I think the problem may be due
to you hitting the windows filename length limit. Try building in a
directory whose name is too long.
I have been able to build the 1.1 branch on windows in a directory such
as C:\dev\geronimo\br\1.1, but I believe that
Simon,
I just checked out http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/tags/1.1.0
and there were only two files containing 1.0-SNAPSHOT :
modules\activation\pom.xml
modules\client-builder\src\test-resources\plans\plan2.xml
Please try deleting your checkout of the tag and checkout again ( I seem
Jeff Genender wrote:
Hey folks,
I want to update the contributors page of the geronimo.apache.org site...
- trtd bgcolor=#f3f4f5Jeff Genender/td
td bgcolor=#f3f4f5Virtuas/td td
bgcolor=#f3f4f5---/td/tr
+ trtd bgcolor=#f3f4f5Jeff Genender/td
td
Are these being used/maintained? Should they be deleted to avoid confusion?
Thanks,
John
Jacek Laskowski wrote:
On 6/27/06, Jason Dillon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Any objections to enabling wiki-rendering for the GERONIMO JIRA project?
This will allow comment and description fields to utilize Confluence-
style wiki markup.
Don't know what it will give us, but sounds fine.
Its
Jacek Laskowski wrote:
On 6/27/06, Jeff Genender [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I did it the old fashioned way...
I updated the svn for the raw code, then I made a short cut and just
edited the actual site. Made it so I didn't have to publish the whole
thing...I cheated ;-)
Does anyone know what
FYI.. This may be related to http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2082
John
Jason Dillon wrote:
Any idea where the stax:stax-api:1.1.1-dev comes from?
The root pom states that stax:stax-api:1.0 should be used... but the
errors with the xmlbeans plugin all state 1.1.1-dev.
--jason
Jason Dillon wrote:
Why does it fail the first time? This seems fishy too...
I'm rebuild again to see what it does, but that is painfully slow...
If we really do depend on a development version of the plugin, then we
should either...
Lobby to get the plugin released
or
Checkin and
I don't think we should be removing files until we have a 100%
functional m2 build. The trunk should always be buildable.
If the M2 build isn't going to be straightforward we should have some
information in something like the README.txt file documenting how the
build should be executed.
Jason Dillon wrote:
I agree that trunk should always be buildable... though its been
months since I've been able to build from the trunk :-P
I assume you mean you haven't been able to build using m2, not m1. m1
builds work fine for me.
John
--jason
On Jun 27, 2006, at 12:33 AM, John
I noticed that the download page no longer has a KEYS link. Yesterday
(before the update to the site) the KEYS link at the very bottom of the
download page pointed to http://people.apache.org/dist/geronimo/KEYS but
it seems there is a more up-to-date version in
Matt Hogstrom wrote:
+1 John. If you would do that it would be excellent. The KEYS file
is http://www.apache.org/dist/geronimo/KEYS.
John Sisson wrote:
I noticed that the download page no longer has a KEYS link.
Yesterday (before the update to the site) the KEYS link at the very
bottom
I'd also be interested in calling in, preferably closer to 9:00pm if
possible.
http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/meetingtime.html?day=29month=6year=2006p1=78p2=240p3=137p4=179
John
Jules Gosnell wrote:
Matt Hogstrom wrote:
I was planning on attending the CeltiXFire BOF at 2100 Dublin
If we do move things around in trunk, will it make merging changes made
in the 1.1 branch more difficult? If so, how important is it to move
things now and would there be a better time to do it, e.g. when 1.1.1 is
released?
John
Jason Dillon wrote:
FYI, another reason to drop the old m1
One of the issues I see with the current process we have for changes
under RTC is that it is hard to keep track of what patches are pending RTC.
Ken suggested that we reintroduce the STATUS file as a way of keeping
track of the status of patches (
Jason Dillon wrote:
2. Not all communication regarding the fix is done in JIRA comments,
therefore people reviewing the fix have to search the mailing lists
and JIRA reducing the amount of time they have to actually review the
change. This also makes it harder for people in the future who
three +1
votes from other committers to three +1 votes from a PMC member. Did
I miss an email that got sent out from the PMC?
Regards,
Alan
John Sisson wrote:
One of the issues I see with the current process we have for changes
under RTC is that it is hard to keep track of what patches
Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
John Sisson wrote:
One of the issues I see with the current process we have for changes
under RTC is that it is hard to keep track of what patches are
pending RTC.
Ken suggested that we reintroduce the STATUS file as a way of keeping
track of the status of patches
Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
John Sisson wrote:
Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
John Sisson wrote:
One of the issues I see with the current process we have for
changes under RTC is that it is hard to keep track of what patches
are pending RTC.
Ken suggested that we reintroduce the STATUS file as a way
Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
John Sisson wrote:
Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
John Sisson wrote:
Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
John Sisson wrote:
snip
Lots of process...
/snip
* If a PMC member is the person who completes the vote (
three binding +1s and no vetos) for the latest version of the
patch
Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
John Sisson wrote:
Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
John Sisson wrote:
Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
John Sisson wrote:
Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
John Sisson wrote:
snip
Lots of process...
/snip
* If a PMC member is the person who completes the vote (
three binding +1s
I had the same problem when you reported it, but didn't have time to
chase it up, but it seems fine now. Anyone know what happened?
John
Sachin Patel wrote:
So it looks like something is wrong with the mirrored jars on ibiblio.
If you take a look at any of the 1.1 jars Matt published to
Jason Dillon wrote:
So far 2+ days, several patches... one PMC +1, one non-PMC +1 (with
caveat to ping JVZ)... now crazy problems with diff/patch.. which I'm
not exactly sure how that affects the current votes... or does adding
a new version of the patch negate anything else voted upon.
Have
Jason Dillon wrote:
So far 2+ days, several patches... one PMC +1, one non-PMC +1 (with
caveat to ping JVZ)... now crazy problems with diff/patch.. which I'm
not exactly sure how that affects the current votes... or does adding
a new version of the patch negate anything else voted upon.
IMO, a
PMC
member
looked at it. And that took over a week to garner enough votes.
Imagine
how long it would take if we had to get 3 PMC +1! I think we need to
clear
this up ASAP!
On 7/1/06, John Sisson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
AFAIK, it has never changed from having three binding +1 votes from
Alan,
What type of concerns do they have regarding its close association with
Geronimo?
Regards,
John
Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
I also am leaning towards the idea that it's good for OpenEJB to be
separate from Geronimo. Whenever I talk w/ users of OpenEJB, they are
always concerned about its
David,
I will ensure this gets followed up by Ken. CCing the PMC.
Regards,
John
David Jencks wrote:
On Jul 4, 2006, at 4:54 PM, John Sisson wrote:
Matt Hogstrom wrote:
I do not believe the +1's need to be from PMC members but other
committers. This is a snippet from Ken's personal web
Matt Hogstrom wrote:
I think the Maven 2 work is a significant project. It appears to me
that RTC has worked really well in increasing e-mail traffic on the
list exponentially but I too would agree that it has not been totally
productive. Here is my assessment:
1. Everyone agrees that this
Jason,
INAL, but sections 10 B-E in their open source contract don't sound
appropriate for ASF use to me.
http://www.perforce.com/perforce/contracts/open_source.pdf
We wouldn't want the situation where we have to uninstall it or Apache
and the development community has to start paying for
care,
Jeremy
P.S. - I'm a +1 on this if my vote isn't seen as biased. ;)
On 7/4/06, *John Sisson* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Alan,
What type of concerns do they have regarding its close association
with
Geronimo?
Regards,
John
Alan D
Jacek Laskowski wrote:
On 7/3/06, Jason Dillon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
NOTE... the m2 build in trunk is already broken... this patches help
FIX MANY OF THOSE PROBLEMS!
NOTED, but... it's not broken. it has never worked so we can pretend
to call it broken. It's a small, but important point we
Congratulations Matt Jeff!
Regards,
John
Rodent of Unusual Size wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Last week the PMC voted to invite Jeff Genender and
Matt Hogstrom to join it. Both have accepted the
invitation and will be part of the team responsible
for overseeing the
I have added the page Committing patches to the Subversion Repository
as a place to document the issues/recommendations involved in applying
and committing patches. See
http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/GMOxDEV/Committing+patches+to+the+Subversion+Repository
It is very much under
In the Derby library does not have line number debug information mail
thread [1] a few weeks ago I asked whether people wanted to upgrade to
the Derby 10.1.3 maintenance release [2].
David Jencks was the only person who mentioned it should go in the 1.1.1
release but did not hear any
James Strachan wrote:
I've just applied 2 trivial bug fixes to the xbean-spring module of
XBean.
The first is a patch from Guillaume which is a one liner to create the
xml parser using a helper method (used by all the other
ApplicationContext implementations).
What does everyone think of adopting a format similar to what I have
used in http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2194 for JIRA
issues for bug fixes. I expect we would use a different format for
enhancements. I got the idea from Derby's wiki page
have to have some descriptive
text so people could tell what to put where.
Thanks,
Aaron
On 7/15/06, John Sisson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What does everyone think of adopting a format similar to what I have
used in http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2194 for JIRA
issues for bug
Jason Dillon wrote:
I think if we want to get folks to give us these sections of data that
we should probably add fields for them to fill in, not ask them to use
a wiki-based template.
--jason
On Jul 15, 2006, at 6:51 PM, John Sisson wrote:
Are your concerns about it being *way* to much related
for Geronimo Bugs is
simple enough. I can help. BTW, what about our RTC state
discussion? Can I go ahead and move on that idea?
Regards,
Alan
John Sisson wrote:
I'm fine with using fields instead, as it would be more work for
developers to use the wiki syntax (especially if they aren't familiar
It is related to some changes you made ages ago. The JIRA has all the
details.
I'll go ahead and delete the files once I have your confirmation.
Thanks,
John
Jason Dillon wrote:
Does each module really need LICENSE.txt and NOTICE.txt?
Or can we just have this at the top-level of the project?
I'd rather have less duplicate files to maintain...
Any comments?
--jason
I think they are needed as each downloadable jar (which each module has)
should
Jason Dillon wrote:
Um... when were these ever included in the module's jars before?
--jason
On Jul 16, 2006, at 5:04 PM, John Sisson wrote:
Jason Dillon wrote:
Does each module really need LICENSE.txt and NOTICE.txt?
Or can we just have this at the top-level of the project?
I'd rather
Whilst testing the geronimo eclipse plugin, eclipse prompted me to
acknowledge the Sun license at
http://developers.sun.com/license/berkeley_license.html when caching the
j2ee schema files (e.g. http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/j2ee/ejb-jar_2_1.xsd ).
This made me wonder whether this license has
Installed eclipse 3.2, installed JST (J2EE Standard Tools and its
dependencies), pointed it to an existing geronimo installation and
created a J2EE project. I haven't had the time to read eclipse
tutorials on using the JST, so didn't build anything.
Have you thought about using a tool like
I have already run into problems with path lengths in the 1.1 branch
with daytrader now we have moved to 1.1.1-SNAPSHOT. See
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DAYTRADER-6
Considering the number of developers (and possibly future developers) on
the windows platform, we should ensure it
On Jul 18, 2006, at 9:01 PM, John Sisson wrote:
I have already run into problems with path lengths in the 1.1 branch
with daytrader now we have moved to 1.1.1-SNAPSHOT. See
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DAYTRADER-6
Considering the number of developers (and possibly future developers
).
--kevan
Jason Dillon wrote:
If we want to keep these guys in the jars, then we should move them
to their standard src/main/resources/META-INF/* locations so that
they get picked up automatically.
--jason
On Jul 16, 2006, at 5:27 PM, John Sisson wrote:
Jason Dillon wrote:
Um... when were
I noticed the scout.log entry below. I looked in
geronimo-1.1\repository\scout\scout\0.5\scout-0.5.jar in the
log4j.properties file and it has log4j.debug uncommented!
I think that is the culprit. May want to send a mail to the scout
project http://ws.apache.org/scout/
John
Jason Dillon
Sorry for the slow response.. comments inline.
Kevan Miller wrote:
On Jul 18, 2006, at 6:43 PM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
Kevan Miller wrote:
On Jul 18, 2006, at 8:53 AM, John Sisson wrote:
Whilst testing the geronimo eclipse plugin, eclipse prompted me to
acknowledge the Sun license
Hi Aaron,
What license is the documentation content at your
http://www.geronimoplugins.com site under? For example the FAQ and the
PDF http://www.geronimoplugins.com/geronimo-plugin-workshop.pdf ?
I would like to look at copying some of the documentation about the
plugin architecture to
Should a link be added on the
http://geronimo.apache.org/subprojects.html page to the
http://geronimo.apache.org/xbean/ site? Currently I don't think there
are any links to XBean from the Geronimo site.
The XBean poms also need to be updated with the new website address
instead of
It built successfully for me in cygwin (first attempt failed in timer
tests). I'll try to do some tests on the weekend.
I agree with Jeff's comments that we should have this pass the TCK
before it is merged back to trunk.
Thanks,
John
Jason Dillon wrote:
This should do the trick:
svn
]
Building OpenEJB2...
Authentication realm: https://svn.codehaus.org:443 openejb Repo
Password for 'sissonj':
John
Thanks,
--jason
On Jul 20, 2006, at 10:02 PM, John Sisson wrote:
It built successfully for me in cygwin (first
I don't see your mail there
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/ws-scout-dev/
John
Jason Dillon wrote:
So far no response from the scout peeps...
:-(
--jason
On Jul 19, 2006, at 4:34 PM, John Sisson wrote:
I noticed the scout.log entry below. I looked in
geronimo-1.1\repository
I plan to commit the patch attached to this JIRA soon for 1.1.1, as it
is a bug fix and trunk if there aren't any objections.
Regards,
John
John Sisson (JIRA) wrote:
Application errors in static initialization blocks during serialization of
configuration during deployment due to incorrect
itself).
Cheers!
Hernan
Jacek Laskowski wrote:
On 7/20/06, John Sisson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Should a link be added on the
http://geronimo.apache.org/subprojects.html page to the
http://geronimo.apache.org/xbean/ site? Currently I don't think there
are any links to XBean from the Geronimo
issues)
Components: website
Affects Versions: 1.2
Reporter: John Sisson
Priority: Minor
Fix For: 1.2
Currently the Geronimo site is build using Ant.
The Ant build has been recently updated to use Velocity to 1.5-dev (I built
from svn rev 386004
Is
1.1\modules\deployment\src\java\org\apache\geronimo\deployment\SingleFileHotDeployer.java
still used? I can see anything referencing it except for some tests.
It was added in April 2006 by Dain in
http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=397307view=rev
What is its relationship to the
Aaron,
What JIRA is associated with this change?
Thanks,
John
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: ammulder
Date: Tue Jul 25 08:55:34 2006
New Revision: 425429
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=425429view=rev
Log:
Module and name are independent of artifact
Modified:
Reposting.. probably got lost in all the email traffic.
John
John Sisson wrote:
Aaron,
What JIRA is associated with this change?
Thanks,
John
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: ammulder
Date: Tue Jul 25 08:55:34 2006
New Revision: 425429
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=425429view=rev
Altered the subject, hopefully won't go unnoticed this time :-)
John
John Sisson wrote:
Reposting.. probably got lost in all the email traffic.
John
John Sisson wrote:
Aaron,
What JIRA is associated with this change?
Thanks,
John
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: ammulder
Date: Tue Jul 25
I think it would be worthwhile continuing to work on this but I think we
need to sort out some of the issues mentioned below before we switch
over so any committer can update the site without requiring assistance
from Infra or yourself. I also agree with Matt's comment about it being
Hernan Cunico wrote:
Hi All,
this is a friendly reminder that the Moin Moin wiki ( namely
wiki.apache.org/geronimo ) is being migrated to the confluence based
http://cwiki.apache.org/geronimo
Great!
Please refrain from continuing updating content to the Moin Moin wiki.
The current
Dain Sundstrom wrote:
On Jul 27, 2006, at 7:29 PM, Matt Hogstrom wrote:
Aaron Mulder wrote:
On 7/27/06, John Sisson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think this would simplify configuration for users. Could we log a
warning (that can be enabled/disabled) at deploy time identifying
extended
.
If anyone is opposed to this plan let me know.
Also, please review the JIRA's below. If you don't think you can get
thte ones done with your name please unassign yourself and hopefully
someone else will pick them up.
Thanks.
*Outstanding Issues*
GERONIMO- Open John Sisson
Congratulations David!
Regards,
John
Matt Hogstrom wrote:
The PMC would like to welcome David Jencks as the newest member of the
PMC. Please join us in welcoming David.
Matt
Hernan Cunico wrote:
John Sisson wrote:
Hernan Cunico wrote:
Hi All,
this is a friendly reminder that the Moin Moin wiki ( namely
wiki.apache.org/geronimo ) is being migrated to the confluence based
http://cwiki.apache.org/geronimo
Great!
Please refrain from continuing updating content
I noticed that there are lines in the pages that you have to scroll
right to read. For example, open
http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/GMOxMoinMoin/Advanced_Plugin_Sample
and look at the bullet points after the words Here are some things to
note. Any idea what is happening there?
Congratulations Kevan!
John
Matt Hogstrom wrote:
Please welcome Kevan Miller as the newest member of the Geronimo PMC.
Kevan recently accepted the invitation to join the PMC. As such we
now have an additional set of eyes to help with reviews as well as
other PMC oversight responsibilities.
Congratulations Paul!
John
Matt Hogstrom wrote:
All,
We're pleased to let you know that we have a new committer in our
midst. Paul McMahan has recently accepted an invitation to join the
Geronimo project. Paul has been active on Geronimo for several months
and has provided numerous
Kevan Miller wrote:
On Aug 8, 2006, at 12:42 PM, Aaron Mulder wrote:
On 8/8/06, Kevan Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Inline...
On Aug 8, 2006, at 12:08 PM, Aaron Mulder wrote:
Here are the issues that bother me most in 1.1.1. I believe they are
all also issues in 1.1.
DEPLOYMENT
It appears https access for OpenEJB non-committers isn't available any
more. AFAIK the maven build scripts have been updated to take this into
account, but to be able to use them you will need to do an svn update
manually, delete the openejb directory and then try a maven
m:fresh-checkout .
/openejb/branches/v2_1/openejb2
John
Rick McGuire wrote:
John Sisson wrote:
It appears https access for OpenEJB non-committers isn't available
any more. AFAIK the maven build scripts have been updated to take
this into account, but to be able to use them you will need to do an
svn update
I am trying to build the eclipse project files for a clean 1.1 build.
I did the following:
* svn co https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/branches/1.1
* cd 1.1
* maven m:fresh-checkout
* maven new
* maven m:eclipse -o
The m:eclipse processing fails in OpenEJB itests. How do I get the
Does anyone else get this problem or is it just me ?
John
+
| configurations Daytrader using derby deployed on jetty
| Memory: 47M/60M
+
DEPRECATED: the default goal should be specified in the build section
of
I think we should have it in 1.1.1 - seems to fit the blocker category
to me.
John
David Jencks wrote:
I'm not quite sure where the 1.1.1 release is, so I'm asking if we
should merge in dain's fix for g-2305.
The problem is that if you get a resource url from our classloader for
something
I worked out that this zip wasn't in the local repository because my
build script was specifying -Dgeronimo.assembly.zip=false, Doh!
Thanks for your help Kevan.
John
Kevan Miller wrote:
On Aug 9, 2006, at 10:04 PM, John Sisson wrote:
I am trying to build the eclipse project files
Anyone know of any changes that could have broken it? I have tried the
build on windows and solaris and get the same error.
John
+
| configurations openejb Configuration for performing J2EE deployments
| Memory: 49M/78M
org.apache.geronimo.activation.handlers.TextPlainTest
[junit] Tests run: 3, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Time elapsed: 0.03 sec
[junit] Running org.apache.geronimo.activation.handlers.TextXmlTest
[junit] Tests run: 3, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Time elapsed: 0.011 sec
--kevan
On Aug 11, 2006, at 2:33 AM, John Sisson wrote:
Anyone
Congratulations Alan!
Regards,
John
Matt Hogstrom wrote:
The Apache Geronimo PMC would like to let everyone know that Alan
Cabrera has accepted the invitation to join the Geronimo PMC. We are
excited to have Alan assisting with project oversight in addition to
his technical contributions to
1 - 100 of 991 matches
Mail list logo
