Make the hlog file names unique
---
Key: HBASE-2580
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-2580
Project: Hadoop HBase
Issue Type: Improvement
Reporter: Jean-Daniel Cryans
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://review.hbase.org/r/76/
---
(Updated 2010-05-26 18:09:30.362592)
Review request for hbase.
Changes
---
---
On 2010-05-26 18:09:30, Jean-Daniel Cryans wrote:
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://review.hbase.org/r/76/
---
(Updated 2010-05-26 18:09
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://review.hbase.org/r/164/
---
Review request for hbase.
Summary
---
Patch that first adds a new testing
I agree with Ryan, and what we actually need would be a Known Issues
document shipped with all releases. For 0.20, lack of sync should be
the top item.
J-D
On Wed, Jun 9, 2010 at 1:07 PM, Ryan Rawson ryano...@gmail.com wrote:
Every release we ship has bugs, some known, most unknown. I have
---
On 2010-06-08 16:04:06, Jean-Daniel Cryans wrote:
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://review.hbase.org/r/164
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://review.hbase.org/r/76/#review174
---
On 2010-06-08 17:54:19, Jean-Daniel Cryans wrote
I'm -1, we need HBASE-2712. The fix is super easy, I will do that today.
J-D
On Mon, Jun 7, 2010 at 1:09 PM, Stack st...@duboce.net wrote:
I've posted an hbase 0.20.5 release candidate 2 here:
http://people.apache.org/~stack/hbase-0.20.5-candidate-2/
Should we release this candidate as
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://review.hbase.org/r/170/
---
Review request for hbase.
Summary
---
Patch against branch that does some
I've posted an hbase 0.20.5 release candidate 3 here:
http://people.apache.org/~jdcryans/hbase-0.20.5-candidate-3/
Should we release this candidate as hbase 0.20.5?
It has 20 fixes: http://su.pr/1prW9y
Please take it for a test spin if you have a chance. Vote closes
Wednesday, the 15th of
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://review.hbase.org/r/76/#review191
---
On 2010-06-08 17:54:19, Jean-Daniel Cryans wrote:
---
This is an automatically
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://review.hbase.org/r/187/#review244
---
Ship it!
Looks good to me, nice cleanup compared to branch!
-
Ran some imports and all unit tests, +1
J-D
On Sat, Jun 19, 2010 at 12:41 PM, Stack st...@duboce.net wrote:
I've posted an hbase 0.20.5 release candidate 5 here:
http://people.apache.org/~stack/hbase-0.20.5-candidate-5/
There have been 24 issues addressed since the release of hbase-0.20.4
On 2010-06-25 15:07:35, stack wrote:
src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/hbase/replication/regionserver/ReplicationSink.java,
line 149
http://review.hbase.org/r/76/diff/7/?file=1590#file1590line149
Duplicated code -- see up about ten lines.
Jean-Daniel Cryans wrote:
Not it's
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://review.hbase.org/r/76/
---
(Updated 2010-06-30 15:36:59.081075)
Review request for hbase.
Changes
---
Please open a jira https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE so that we
can track the patch and review.
Thanks!
J-D
On Tue, Jul 6, 2010 at 10:14 AM, Sebastian Bauer ad...@ugame.net.pl wrote:
Hello, i have create small patch for thrift interface to increament many
columns in many rows in
TestReplication failed because it tripped on
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-2781
J-D
On Tue, Jul 6, 2010 at 6:50 AM, Apache Hudson Server
hud...@hudson.zones.apache.org wrote:
See http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/HBase-TRUNK/1373/changes
Changes:
[jgray] HBASE-2806
merge stuff has been broken for a while.
TestReplication can get stuck on HBASE-2781 (which fixes something
from the master rewrite).
J-D
On Wed, Jul 7, 2010 at 9:55 PM, Ryan Rawson ryano...@gmail.com wrote:
multiple failures in weird places, none of which happened when i ran
mvn test before
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://review.hbase.org/r/278/#review318
---
Ship it!
Few nits, commit if it passes all tests.
+1 on both, let's stabilize this.
J-D
On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 8:57 PM, Stack st...@duboce.net wrote:
Any objections?
Anything that needs to be added to either before we cut release candidates?
0.20 branch has a few NPE fixes and an RPC leak healed.
TRUNK, from where we'll cut the next
Just so it's clear, TestHRegion was also failing for
http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/HBase-TRUNK/1392/
J-D
On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 7:44 PM, Apache Hudson Server
hud...@hudson.zones.apache.org wrote:
See http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/HBase-TRUNK/1395/changes
Changes:
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://review.hbase.org/r/380/#review471
---
Some nits, I'm also trying it out (with the update=true fix)
We still need to release something somewhat stabilized, that's
unaffected by new features coming while we do that.
Personally I'd like to see HBASE-2838 in that release, gives some
insight into what's happening when replication is enabled. I posted a
basic patch on RB yesterday, that's probably
+1, I downloaded the release, checked the documentation, ran a few
YCSB, everything's fine.
J-D
On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 9:15 PM, Stack st...@duboce.net wrote:
I've posted an hbase 0.20.6 release candidate 5 here:
http://people.apache.org/~stack/hbase-0.20.6-candidate-1/
There have been 8
In 0.89 you can specify CACHE for the count command. Set it higher (it
defaults to 10 rows per call).
Also you can use the RowCounter MR job.
J-D
On Thu, Jul 29, 2010 at 2:22 PM, Ted Yu yuzhih...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
The count method in HBase shell is quite slow.
Is there a way to obtain
:
select count(*) from table and not to launch M/R job
for this purpose.
Best regards,
Vladimir Rodionov
Principal Platform Engineer
Carrier IQ, www.carrieriq.com
From: jdcry...@gmail.com [jdcry...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Jean-Daniel Cryans
[jdcry
Although, I've been doing lots of tests on 0.89.2010726 patched with
Kannan's fix and it works pretty well. Also replication was enabled,
and was tested too.
J-D
On Thu, Jul 29, 2010 at 9:59 AM, Jean-Daniel Cryans jdcry...@apache.org wrote:
-1
Because of HBASE-2755, I cannot even boot
Unless anyone thinks that what I listed is bad enough to sink, the
testing I did today leads me to +1.
J-D
On Mon, Aug 2, 2010 at 1:14 PM, Jean-Daniel Cryans jdcry...@apache.org wrote:
Some notes, no vote yet:
- The images in the documentation aren't showing up, looks like the
link is wrong
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://review.cloudera.org/r/484/#review636
---
First pass, still trying to understand what's going on
We have only 1 nic that we use per machine, problem solved on all 5 clusters :)
J-D
On Tue, Aug 3, 2010 at 2:45 PM, Ted Yu yuzhih...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
It has been very quiet on:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-2502
I want to get your opinion on how this is handled in your
Hi Joshua!
Go for it!
J-D
On Tue, Aug 3, 2010 at 8:31 PM, Joshua Chia-Hsuan Ho
joshuachiahsuan...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
My name is Joshua Ho, currently working as a software engineer at Trend
Micro Inc.
I would like to see if I can take this task after got assigned.
Thanks a lot.
nope
On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 10:29 AM, Ted Yu yuzhih...@gmail.com wrote:
Here is jstack again
See if it goes through this time.
On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 10:25 AM, Jean-Daniel Cryans jdcry...@apache.org
wrote:
jstack wasn't attached, and something happened before the beginning of
that log
Since TestScanner was already timeout'ing when HBASE-2897 was
committed, the new test never ran on Hudson until now. TestRowResource
also fails on my machine.
J-D
On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 6:27 AM, Apache Hudson Server
hud...@hudson.apache.org wrote:
See
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://review.cloudera.org/r/694/
---
Review request for hbase.
Summary
---
Simply moves the LogActionListeners
incrementColumnValue, thus missing the point of the title of the jira :S
Uploading a new patch soon that addresses that, along with comments from the
reviews.
- Jean-Daniel
On 2010-08-19 14:59:41, Jean-Daniel Cryans wrote
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://review.cloudera.org/r/694/
---
(Updated 2010-08-20 15:51:17.366257)
Review request for hbase.
Changes
---
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://review.cloudera.org/r/694/
---
(Updated 2010-08-20 15:58:27.771023)
Review request for hbase.
Summary
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://review.cloudera.org/r/691/#review975
---
On 2010-08-19 14:59:41, Jean-Daniel Cryans wrote
---
On 2010-08-19 14:59:41, Jean-Daniel Cryans wrote:
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://review.cloudera.org/r/691
11th sounds good to me.
J-D
On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 12:47 AM, Steven Noels stev...@outerthought.org wrote:
On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 6:52 AM, Jonathan Gray jg...@facebook.com wrote:
That sounds about right. Hopefully early October, right around Hadoop
World. Good place for announcements.
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://review.cloudera.org/r/719/
---
Review request for hbase.
Summary
---
Trying to make some progress on this
:57 AM, Jean-Daniel Cryans
jdcry...@apache.orgwrote:
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://review.cloudera.org/r/719/
---
Review request for hbase
, 2010 at 7:22 AM, Gagandeep Singh
gagandeep.si...@paxcel.net wrote:
HBase - 0.20.5
Hadoop - 0.20.2
Thanks,
Gagan
On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 7:11 PM, Jean-Daniel Cryans
jdcry...@apache.orgwrote:
Hadoop and HBase version?
J-D
On Aug 26, 2010 5:36 AM, Gagandeep Singh gagandeep.si
That, or use CDH3b2.
J-D
On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 11:22 AM, Gagandeep Singh
gagandeep.si...@paxcel.net wrote:
Thanks Daniel
It means I have to checkout the code from branch and build it on my local
machine.
Gagan
On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 9:51 PM, Jean-Daniel Cryans
jdcry
Anything obvious in the logs? Also how old is your branch?
J-D
On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 5:32 AM, Kannan Muthukkaruppan
kan...@facebook.com wrote:
Hi,
Noticed this in our test run once. Didn't repro on a rerun though. But wanted
to share with the list in case anyone was familiar with the
It's time for another DR since the new master code is about to be
merged in and we have a few fixes and improvements that'd beneficiate
from more exposure. I branched from trunk this morning and created a
new tag. (See http://wiki.apache.org/hadoop/Hbase/HBaseVersions for
more on what these 0.89.x
BTW I'm +1, I ran the unit tests, did cluster testing with YCSB, and
deployed it in almost all our environments here (this will be
completed before the voting period ends).
J-D
On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 4:39 PM, Jean-Daniel Cryans jdcry...@apache.org wrote:
It's time for another DR since the new
StoreFile is just a wrapper for HFile to add HBase-sugar on top of it.
J-D
On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 8:16 AM, Himanshu Vashishtha
vashishth...@gmail.com wrote:
It will be great if anyone point out the difference in their functionality.
What I understand is Storefile is made persistent in fs,
Second RC, new vote!
Source binary and source tar balls are available here:
http://people.apache.org/~jdcryans/hbase-0.89.20100830-candidate-2/
You can also browse the candidate documentation here:
http://people.apache.org/~jdcryans/hbase-0.89.20100830-candidate-2/hbase-0.89.20100830/docs/
have insight for
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-2694
On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 4:35 PM, Jean-Daniel Cryans
jdcry...@apache.orgwrote:
After some discussions today here at SU between Todd and the team, it
was suggested that this 0.89 release contains more of what we run in
production
The 0.89.20100830 DR branch was cancelled, here's the new RC off a new branch.
As discussed, this release candidate contains a revert of HBASE-2694
which means that it is back on the very old master. It is also very
similar to what we run here in production.
Sources and binaries can be found
this is a blocker for a DR, as it only affects users
doing only tons of ICVs on particular tables, but it should be
disclosed somewhere.
J-D
On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 4:03 PM, Jean-Daniel Cryans jdcry...@apache.org wrote:
The 0.89.20100830 DR branch was cancelled, here's the new RC off a new branch
the basic stuff. No
performance stuff but I think enough for my vote.
JG
-Original Message-
From: jdcry...@gmail.com [mailto:jdcry...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Jean-
Daniel Cryans
Sent: Monday, October 04, 2010 10:56 AM
To: dev@hbase.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release 'development
+1, looking forward to these changes.
J-D
On Tue, Oct 5, 2010 at 7:13 PM, Andrew Purtell apurt...@apache.org wrote:
We've been nursing dynamic RPC and coprocessor changes for a couple of weeks
now and don't see any failures beyond what are already on trunk with them
applied.
I was going
Please don't cross-post on mailing lists, this is a question meant for
user@ not d...@.
J-D
2010/10/6 Petrucci Andreas petrucci_2...@hotmail.com:
Hello there, i have compiled the HBase source code and i;m running locally
the HMaster. However when i try to create a table and insert rows with
If your Puts are using the WAL, and you are on 0.89, it's already as
durable as it can be without forcing flushes.
J-D
On Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at 8:07 PM, Ted Yu yuzhih...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
HBaseAdmin.flush() is asynchronous.
In order to achieve high durability, do I have a better choice ?
:
We're still using 0.20.6 :-)
On Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at 5:19 PM, Jean-Daniel Cryans
jdcry...@apache.orgwrote:
If your Puts are using the WAL, and you are on 0.89, it's already as
durable as it can be without forcing flushes.
J-D
On Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at 8:07 PM, Ted Yu yuzhih...@gmail.com wrote
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://review.cloudera.org/r/1077/
---
Review request for hbase.
Summary
---
Does exactly what this jira is
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://review.cloudera.org/r/1078/#review1655
---
/#review1693
---
On 2010-10-28 16:42:25, Jean-Daniel Cryans wrote:
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://review.cloudera.org/r/
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://review.cloudera.org/r//
---
Review request for hbase.
Summary
---
This new mapreduce job called
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://review.cloudera.org/r/1149/
---
Review request for hbase.
Summary
---
Adds a small check if the directory
Hey guys,
Now that I committed HBASE-2471, new unit tests that play with log
splitting will need to create the region dirs _before_ using
HLogSplitter or it will refuse to do it. I've done the changes in
TestHLog, TestHLogSplit and TestWALReplay already.
Thx,
J-D
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://review.cloudera.org/r/1188/
---
Review request for hbase.
Summary
---
This patch simply adds the = in
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://review.cloudera.org/r/1187/#review1866
---
trunk/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/hbase/client/HBaseAdmin.java
) changed the
minidfscluster. Best regards,
- Andy
- Original Message
From: Jean-Daniel Cryans jdcry...@apache.org
To: dev@hbase.apache.org
Sent: Fri, November 12, 2010 4:20:40 PM
Subject: Re: Build failed in Hudson: HBase-TRUNK #1650
I found the change that makes everything
I think it's worth going at greater lengths to document that kind of
breakage, maybe a page in the book? Stuff like What's new and
Incompatibilities that we can easily link to.
J-D
On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 12:38 PM, Ryan Rawson ryano...@gmail.com wrote:
That is correct, those classes were
Currently both trunk and 0.90's pom.xml are incomplete, we were
relying on Ryan's repo have the thrift pom but now that it was changed
to Stack's new comers cannot compile the project since that pom is
missing. Reported by kzk9 on IRC.
So either we had Ryan's repo back in the pom, or Stack copies
Seems like a classic .META. issue from 0.20, I would suggest that you
look at the master's state (regions in transition, etc), and that you
scan .META. for that table.
Also, looking at the code that lists the table, I see one case where a
row would be in .META. but not listed:
byte[]
Do you have them or not? If so, a normal deleteall from the shell does the work.
J-D
On Fri, Nov 19, 2010 at 10:08 AM, Ted Yu yuzhih...@gmail.com wrote:
How do I delete the other regions for this table in .META. ?
Thanks
On Fri, Nov 19, 2010 at 10:01 AM, Jean-Daniel Cryans
jdcry
Woot!
On Fri, Nov 19, 2010 at 1:19 PM, Andrew Purtell (JIRA) j...@apache.org wrote:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-2002?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Andrew Purtell updated HBASE-2002:
--
Is that really from the master log? Can we get the full log in a pastebin?
J-D
On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 7:40 AM, Ted Yu yuzhih...@gmail.com wrote:
I backed up zookeeper dataDir to another location.
After clearing zookeeper dataDir, HMaster still couldn't start:
2010-11-23 15:30:56,095 DEBUG
Can you dig up to where it started doing that?
On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 10:27 AM, Ted Yu yuzhih...@gmail.com wrote:
http://pastebin.com/E86iPnK4
On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 10:23 AM, Jean-Daniel Cryans
jdcry...@apache.orgwrote:
Is that really from the master log? Can we get the full log
So before that first line... everything was fine? What happened there?
On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 10:48 AM, Ted Yu yuzhih...@gmail.com wrote:
Here is relevant portion of master log:
http://pastebin.com/HiembAxc
On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 10:37 AM, Jean-Daniel Cryans
jdcry...@apache.orgwrote
+1
J-D
On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 11:30 AM, Jonathan Gray jg...@fb.com wrote:
HBase Devs,
We're in the final stages of planning an all-day HBase Hackathon on 12/13 at
Facebook. The focus will be on Coprocessors although we'll probably also
spend some time talking about what's next for HBase
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://review.cloudera.org/r/1262/
---
Review request for hbase.
Summary
---
Changes:
- In HMaster, instead of
Party
On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 11:00 AM, Stack st...@duboce.net wrote:
The two lads have been doing great work and earned their wings long
ago. Welcome them to the fold.
St.Ack
.
Best regards,
- Andy
--- On Thu, 12/2/10, Jean-Daniel Cryans (JIRA) j...@apache.org wrote:
From: Jean-Daniel Cryans (JIRA) j...@apache.org
Subject: [jira] Created: (HBASE-3303) Lower hbase.regionserver.handler.count
from 25 back to 10
To: iss...@hbase.apache.org
Date: Thursday
Ooops, looking into it.
J-D
On Mon, Dec 6, 2010 at 3:26 PM, Apache Hudson Server
hud...@hudson.apache.org wrote:
See https://hudson.apache.org/hudson/job/HBase-TRUNK/1685/changes
Changes:
[jdcryans] HBASE-2467 Concurrent flushers in HLog sync using HDFS-895
[stack] If balancer doesn't
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://review.cloudera.org/r/1273/
---
Review request for hbase.
Summary
---
Patch that parallelizes the
generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://review.cloudera.org/r/1273/#review2043
---
On 2010-12-07 16:38:42, Jean-Daniel Cryans wrote:
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail
-1
A bunch of issues were found, on my part there would be HBASE-3318,
3321 and 3326. There's also Todd's OOME on the master that needs some
care.
J-D
On Tue, Dec 7, 2010 at 9:25 AM, Stack st...@duboce.net wrote:
The second hbase 0.90.0 release candidate is available for download:
I guess I would do a dus on /hbase/tablename/*
Not pretty but it works.
J-D
On Thu, Dec 9, 2010 at 3:23 PM, Ted Yu yuzhih...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
What's the quickest way to determine the size for each region in a give
table ?
Thanks
On it. The TestHRegion passes a null server for tests and I forgot to
add the check (which btw is ugly).
J-D
On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 12:29 AM, Apache Hudson Server
hud...@hudson.apache.org wrote:
See https://hudson.apache.org/hudson/job/hbase-0.90/21/changes
Changes:
[jdcryans] HBASE-3308
Two reasons I saw that test failing:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-3366
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-3367
I discovered the second while testing the fix for the first one.
J-D
On Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 11:19 AM, Andrew Purtell apurt...@apache.org wrote:
The previous
This test that hangs looks like HBASE-3343. I can only make
TestMetaReaderEditor fail when running it on my laptop if I'm using
the yes /dev/null trick. In all three logs I see this stack:
2010-12-20 16:41:53,328 WARN
[PostOpenDeployTasks:3d9e86152e5e75258c19d64d4ddb1a4a]
This was ruled out when this jira was closed
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-661
See the comments on why, feel free to post there if you think we
should include such a feature and more importantly how it can be
implemented in a way that's not adding a lot of extra complexity.
Thx,
It's a zookeeper setting, you cannot have by default more than 30
connections from the same IP per ZK peer.
If HBase is starting ZK for you, do change
hbase.zookeeper.property.maxClientCnxns
J-D
On Tue, Jan 4, 2011 at 11:09 AM, Ted Yu yuzhih...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I am using HBase 0.90 and
What happened is that the splitting failed after a region server was
killed but was never retried, thus the logs weren't archived nor
replicated.
Looks like a bug in MasterFileSystem or something around that part of
the code? Investigating.
J-D
On Mon, Jan 3, 2011 at 10:08 PM, Apache Hudson
to see a FNFE
instead, but it comes out as a lease problem.
J-D
On Tue, Jan 4, 2011 at 11:27 AM, Jean-Daniel Cryans jdcry...@apache.org wrote:
What happened is that the splitting failed after a region server was
killed but was never retried, thus the logs weren't archived nor
replicated.
Looks
+1, ran the tests, checked out the docs, gave it a ride.
J-D
On Fri, Jan 7, 2011 at 5:03 PM, Stack st...@duboce.net wrote:
The fourth hbase 0.90.0 release candidate is available for download:
http://people.apache.org/~stack/hbase-0.90.0-candidate-3/
This is going to be the one!
Should we
There's some sort of mismatch:
RegionServer ephemeral node deleted, processing expiration
[localhost.,60020,1295592845214]
and
Waiting on regionserver(s) to go down localhost,60020,1295592845214
Do you see the dot after localhost in the first line? I wonder how
it got different in the znode
I'd guess so and the same could be done for splits and compactions
since it's (almost) the same code.
J-D
On Sat, Jan 22, 2011 at 8:00 AM, Ted Yu yuzhih...@gmail.com wrote:
In 0.90, HBaseAdmin.flush() uses a loop to go over ListPairHRegionInfo,
HServerAddress
Should executor service be used
There's slower ways, but not quicker ways as far as I know.
J-D
On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 4:37 PM, Ted Yu yuzhih...@gmail.com wrote:
HBase shell provides this command:
truncate Disables, drops and recreates the specified table
Is there a quicker way of removing all rows ?
Thanks
Ted,
I don't see anything relating to hbase in that log so... how can we be of help?
J-D
On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 3:41 AM, Ted Yu yuzhih...@gmail.com wrote:
This seems to be the last issue blocking hbase 0.90 upgrade.
Please comment.
On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 4:58 PM, Ted Yu
If you want to try to debug your issue, I suggest you take a look at
those datanode logs. For example, using the data from your first
email, here's what I would do:
The first exception is
WARN org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.DFSClient: DFSOutputStream ResponseProcessor
exception for block
(moving this to the user mailing list where it belongs)
You need to make sure that your webapp knows the address of the
JobTracker, usually this is done by either putting mapred-site.xml on
your app's classpath or you can set mapred.job.tracker correctly so
that in createSubmittableJob you would
(moving to the user mailing list, where it belongs)
My educated guess is that you had a GC pause that lasted for more than a
minute while a file was being written to. Even if the write wasn't
happening, your region server would have committed suicide anyways since it
was probably past it's lease
There's an offline tool called Merge that you can use at your own
risk, but nothing currently will do it automagically.
J-D
On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 6:14 PM, Zhou Shuaifeng zhoushuaif...@huawei.com wrote:
If not, there may be many empty or very small regions, and it will cause
meta data too
or email immediately and delete it!
-邮件原件-
发件人: jdcry...@gmail.com [mailto:jdcry...@gmail.com] 代表 Jean-Daniel
Cryans
发送时间: 2011年2月9日 10:16
收件人: dev@hbase.apache.org
主题: Re: Can region be merged with others automatically when all data in
the region has expired and removed ?
There's
1 - 100 of 480 matches
Mail list logo
