Looks like a very interesting module!
i'd love to see this adapted.
~Jorge
On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 7:27 PM, Graham Leggett wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> As with mod_firehose and mod_policy, I have concluded negotiation with the
> BBC to open source some httpd modules that I wrote under the AL, and the
On Tue, May 17, 2011 at 9:19 PM, William A. Rowe Jr.
wrote:
> About the patch, yes this should go in. I'm busy for a day or few
> but flagged your message to come back to it, if there is a bugzilla
> incident please tag it 'depends on' PR 49997.
>
> On 5/17/2011 1
I'm still all for this,
But do many people use a 64-bit variant of httpd it self? I've long
since switched to linux for both my server and my development
environment but still provide binaries I compile on my website. (If
I'm lazy I get about 2-3 mails per day asking for the newest release)
So her
Any httpd people coming to FOSDEM in Brussels, Belgium this weekend?
If so Saterday or Sunday?
I hope to go on Saterday... But need to clear something first :(
Kind regards
Jorge
--
~Jorge
I'm +1 for making both VC6 and VC9 builds from 2.4 and on, like PHP does.
>
> Issac
>
> On 31/01/2011 11:21, Jorge Schrauwen wrote:
>> Hi
>>
>> If I remember correctly wrowe said it was because a lot of 3rd party
>> modules use VC6.
>> Although that
Hi
If I remember correctly wrowe said it was because a lot of 3rd party
modules use VC6.
Although that was a while ago so I could be wrong.
If I'm indeed correct maybe 2.4 is a good time to switch to VC9?
~Jorge
On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 10:06 AM, Ferenc Kovacs wrote:
> Hi.
>
> I'm a php deve
~Jorge
On Fri, Oct 8, 2010 at 7:55 AM, Jorge Schrauwen
wrote:
> ~Jorge
>
>
>
> On Fri, Oct 8, 2010 at 4:23 AM, William A. Rowe Jr.
> wrote:
>> After some discussion on list about the numbering and quality of mod_ftp
>> today, it seems this is an appropriate
~Jorge
On Fri, Oct 8, 2010 at 4:23 AM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
> After some discussion on list about the numbering and quality of mod_ftp
> today, it seems this is an appropriate time to consider GA, candidate
> tarballs are up at http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/mod_ftp/ - so please
> vote.
Hey,
I downloaded the latest windows msi (with ssl) because I had no time
to manually compile.
I noticed mod_reqtimeout.so is missing but it is available in the
default httpd.conf
Maybe it should be removed (or the module included) so users don't
accidentally enable it.
Well, if it something that
+1
~Jorge
On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 9:41 PM, Jeff Trawick wrote:
> On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 3:25 PM, Brian McCallister
> wrote:
> > On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 11:02 AM, Dan Poirier wrote:
> >> mod_lua has 8 separate directives for adding hooks using external files
> >> with Lua code (LuaHookX)
On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 7:10 PM, William A. Rowe Jr.
wrote:
> On 3/12/2010 12:06 PM, Jorge Schrauwen wrote:
>> I'm about to build the x64 binaries for on my website and AVG on my
>> development machine throws this at me.
>>
>> Warning: XML Bomb:
>> srclib
On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 11:58 PM, Alex Wulms wrote:
> Op donderdag 14 januari 2010 14:28:42 schreef Martin Langhoff:
> > On Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 8:49 PM, Nick Kew wrote:
> > > I've booked into the renaissance hotel -
> > >
> http://www.marriott.com/hotels/travel/brubr-renaissance-brussels-hotel/
Thats actually not to far for me to drop by one of the days.
1 bit of relaxing after the exams!
Would be nice to finally meet some people I only know from online and irc.
~Jorge
On Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 8:49 PM, Nick Kew wrote:
> Martin Langhoff wrote:
>
>> Hi list,
>>
>> are any developers of
On Wed, Jan 6, 2010 at 12:30 AM, William A. Rowe Jr.
wrote:
> Res wrote:
>> On Tue, 5 Jan 2010, Jorge Schrauwen wrote:
>>
>>> On Mon, Jan 4, 2010 at 11:03 PM, Rich Bowen wrote:
>>>> Speaking from the community that provides end-user support for these
>
On Mon, Jan 4, 2010 at 11:03 PM, Rich Bowen wrote:
> Speaking from the community that provides end-user support for these
> products, a big +1 on that proposal.
>
Sadly, questions will keep on showing up for a long time :(
On Tue, Jan 5, 2010 at 3:11 PM, Noirin Shirley wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 5, 2
On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 5:11 PM, Sander Temme wrote:
> Hi Kevin,
>
> Definitely not the right list: this is where we discuss development of the
> Apache HTTP Server code. us...@httpd.apache.org may be a better forum within
> apache.org. Outside Apache, several initiatives exist to look into ha
I'm with Jim,
Head for 2.4 first.
IIRC there was some talk about moving to a 'd' project, since httpd
now does ftp (mod_ftp), echo, pop3,... and some other protocols.
I don't remember much from it though. I did like the idea back then
but thats about the only thing I remember from that.
Maybe we
~Jorge
[X] +1 to release as 0.9.6-beta
Works ok here on linux (gentoo)
On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 5:28 AM, William A. Rowe, Jr.
wrote:
> Following Rainer's Solaris discoveries and our DISTDIR suggestions,
>
> Please fetch up the newly prepared mod_ftp-0.9.6.tar.gz (or .bz2), or the
> win32/netwa
I'm not too fond of being able to remove it either.
It can always be set to "Apache" with the current configuration
options and that should keep people worried about exploits somewhat
satisfied.
Even if you where able to hide it completely a good script could
figure out if it's a 1.3 2.0 or 2.2 b
Hi Madhuri,
Please direct your question towards us...@httpd.apache.org, include
more information than this too.
Part of your config would be helpful.
Kind regards
~Jorge
On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 1:11 PM, Madhuri wrote:
>
> Hi All - This is the first time I am setting up apache server. It works
Speaking of fastCGI, wasn't a fastCGI module donated to the incubator?
Maybe it's time to look more into it if people aren't already.
~Jorge
On Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 8:24 PM, Akins, Brian wrote:
> On 8/24/09 1:58 PM, "Paul Querna" wrote:
>
>> They then switch to lighttpd, because it is so much
osting
site2.example.org ---> ...
Also support questions should go to us...@httpd.apache.org and not
dev@, this mailing list is for development related discussion.
Jorge Schrauwen
On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 6:01 PM, Branquim wrote:
>
> I want to know if its possible and how to do it...
On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 7:40 PM, Guenter Knauf wrote:
> all,
> Guenter Knauf schrieb:
>> good idea! Based on this here modified samples:
>> http://people.apache.org/~fuankg/testhttpd/releases.txt
>> http://people.apache.org/~fuankg/testhttpd/main_index.txt
>> and final result:
>> http://people.apac
Congrats Bill!
... although my internal understanding of the ASF is limited I seem to
recall this is rather huge :)
~Jorge
On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 2:28 AM, William A. Rowe,
Jr. wrote:
> Just finished the last showstopper. I would be happy to advance this
> to release / general availability vote with the next release, if we can
> determine just a few oddball issue resolutions. Jim and I have already
> gone ahead and m
If I'm not mistaken it's FIFO (First In, First Out).
~Jorge
On Wed, Jul 8, 2009 at 12:39 PM, ricardo13 wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I'm trying understand worker.c module.
> My doubt is about operation push() and pop().
>
> Push() add a socket in array fd_queue_t->data and Pop() retrieve a socket
> for pr
I thought I did but couldn't find it.
I've create a new bug report:
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47418
~Jorge
On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 9:40 PM, Jorge Schrauwen
wrote:
> I can't remember,
>
> I'll open one tomorrow when I have access to
Sorry to dig up this old thread again but some users of my unofficial binary
have been complaining that it still says Win32.
So any chances somebody could look at this again. It's a rather trivial
change I think.
~Jorge
On Wed, Jul 26, 2006 at 11:00 PM, Jorge Schrauwen wrote:
> I ju
As long as the current system isn't replaced by an entire runtime like
program approach I'd be okay with it.
But why not take it a step further than just lua?
Wouldn't it be possible to expose a standardized set of commands,
functions, objects, whatnot to any language?
That start with mod_lua as
[X] +1 to release as 0.9.4-beta
I didn't have time to test the EPSV & EPRT, nor do I have enough
knowledge on the rfc to do so atm.
It does compile and is functional in my config, so it's certainly
usable at the moment.
So I'd like to see it hit beta.
~Jorge
On Tue, Jun 9, 2009 at 1:07 AM, W
On Thu, Jun 4, 2009 at 1:55 PM, Akins, Brian wrote:
> On 6/3/09 7:50 PM, "Plüm, Rüdiger, VF-Group"
> wrote:
>
>> 1. There are many and large and complex configurations out in the world.
>
> Which is exactly why I want/need a better way to do them. I'm currently
> using a template system to gener
On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 10:55 PM, Niklas Edmundsson wrote:
> On Wed, 3 Jun 2009, Jorge Schrauwen wrote:
>
>> I know I'm playing with fire now but...
>>
>> XML based config could solve a few of the problems, XML can also be
>> validated.
>>
>> I have
slowly fade?
~Jorge
On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 10:35 PM, Bertrand Mansion wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 9:47 PM, Jorge Schrauwen
> wrote:
>> On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 9:07 PM, Akins, Brian wrote:
>>> On 6/3/09 2:45 PM, "Jorge Schrauwen" wrote:
>>>
>>>
On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 9:07 PM, Akins, Brian wrote:
> On 6/3/09 2:45 PM, "Jorge Schrauwen" wrote:
>
>> I have to admit lua would be more flexible but I think most server
>> admins have atleast come into contact with XML... while not
>> necessarily the case w
I know I'm playing with fire now but...
XML based config could solve a few of the problems, XML can also be validated.
I have to admit lua would be more flexible but I think most server
admins have atleast come into contact with XML... while not
necessarily the case with lua.
of course a sort o
e, Jr.
wrote:
> Jorge Schrauwen wrote:
>> Trunk builds fine now.
>>
>> Just something that I noticed.
>> when the u...@domainx is used and domainX doesn't exist it will
>> default to the default vhost.
>>
>> could it be possible to make that configu
Trunk builds fine now.
Just something that I noticed.
when the u...@domainx is used and domainX doesn't exist it will
default to the default vhost.
could it be possible to make that configurable to say go to default or
deny connection?
~Jorge
On Sun, May 31, 2009 at 10:58 AM, William A. Rowe
On Sun, May 31, 2009 at 12:06 AM, William A. Rowe, Jr.
wrote:
> Jorge Schrauwen wrote:
>>
>> I'm not saying we shouldn't make it easy to provide and alternative
>> path for apxs it being a little config mod or be it a parameter.
>
> Neither was I :) As Guen
~Jorge
On Sat, May 30, 2009 at 2:27 AM, William A. Rowe, Jr.
wrote:
> Guenter Knauf wrote:
>> Sure that its possible to specify the full path at commandline, but tell
>> me a reason why we should make it harder for users than needed?
>
> The question is; which forks are we accommodating? What
Didn't have much time to tinker with it being exams and all but it
fails to build for me.
I do what I always do untar, ./configure.apxs, make, (make install)
Below you'll find the failed output. I'm not sure when I have time to
look into it.
But I guess some feedback is better than no feedback.
I've been using it as fallback when I can't conenct to mine via webdav.
So far it's working ok, even vhosts but thats still a bit tricky but
works non-the-less.
I'd love to see it included for a 2.2.x but 2.4.x would be nice aswel.
~Jorge
On Tue, May 5, 2009 at 5:56 PM, William A. Rowe, Jr.
w
Maybe a more layered approach would be something to consider for 3.0?
Seems to me that the layers and groups of modules keeps expanding and expanding.
2.0 -> 2.2 had the whole auth move over so maybe it's time to rethink
the current module system for 3.0?
~Jorge
On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 4:25 A
On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 12:59 PM, wrote:
> On Jan 11, 2009 10:53pm, "William A. Rowe, Jr."
> wrote:
> > Based on the enthusiasm of the module authors to adopt the AL and offer
> >
> > the mod_fcgid code to the httpd community, please vote
> >
> >
> >
> > +/-1
>
> [+1] Accept mod_fcgid into htt
Also note that the x64 versions of windows do run 32-bit binaries without a
problem.
I've been providing x64 binaries of httpd 2.2 because people want them.
I've moved from running windows on my servers to running linux. Even an old
128mb, P3 800mhz will run linux + httpd without a hitch.
I also
IIRC there where problems with this. The update dsp doesn't compile clean on
vc6.
vc6 is still the compiler used for all office asf httpd binaries.
~Jorge
On Thu, Dec 18, 2008 at 3:00 PM, Bing Swen wrote:
> Jorge Schrauwen wrote on 2008年12月18日 20:10
>
> On Thu, Dec 18, 2008 at
Looks like you haven't run cvtdsp.pl to convert the vc6 dsp's to once that
upgrade.
There is a more detailed explenation here:
http://www.blackdot.be/?inc=apache/knowledge/tutorials/x64
~Jorge
On Thu, Dec 18, 2008 at 10:14 AM, Bing Swen wrote:
> Jorge Schrauwen wrote on 2008年
I'd prefer mod_core_lua over mod_script_lua.
I don't really see a problem with mod_luau either, LoadModule directives are
usually added to the config if the module is built so I don't think typo's
will be a big issue.
~Jorge
On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 1:33 AM, Eric Covener wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 1
I think to tie it to a version is bad too. And could be very confusing.
On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 8:48 AM, Greg Stein wrote:
> I think it would be a bad idea to tie it to a specific version.
>
> On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 19:59, Brian McCallister wrote:
> > Another suggestion from the lua mailing l
On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 9:01 AM, Bing Swen wrote:
>
> "Jim Jagielski" wrote on 2008-12-14 23:24
>
>
>> On Dec 13, 2008, at 9:32 AM, Ruediger Pluem wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> 2. A number of non binding positive votes and positive feedback.
>>> 3. Binding votes:
>>>
>>> 0 -1
>>> 0 +0
>>> 8 +1 (Colm, San
wouldn't something like mod_lang_lua be better. Since not all future modules
could be script language.
Then again mod_lang_xx does look a bit odd.
~Jorge
On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 10:46 PM, Graham Leggett wrote:
> Graham Dumpleton wrote:
>
> Given that there could be a class of such scripting l
On Sat, Dec 13, 2008 at 6:10 PM, Frank wrote:
> Paul Querna wrote:
>
>> [...]
>> Anything else anyone thinks would be good to get in?
>>
>
> I would like to see a better ErrorLog-handling/implementation.
> It should be similar to the LogFormat/CustomLog!
>
> There are others who want this too:
>
On Mon, Dec 8, 2008 at 9:04 AM, Roy T. Fielding <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Dec 7, 2008, at 1:07 PM, Paul Querna wrote:
>
>> Brian McCallister wrote:
>>>
>>> I know some folks are attached to the wombat moniker, but the name is
>>> likely to confuse users, particularly now that it is in trunk.
+1 on renaming.
I still have to look up what it is every now and then. (Mostly due to
forgetting what it does all the time though)
mod_lua_handler, mod_lua_config meh I'm not good with names.
metal note: look at lua and mod_soonnottobewombat to replace to
replace buggy mod_perl stuff.
~Jorge
Custom compile on Gentoo (x86) +1
~Jorge
On Sat, Dec 6, 2008 at 11:04 PM, Res <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, 6 Dec 2008, Ruediger Pluem wrote:
>
>> +1
>>
>> Tested on the following environments:
>>
>> Solaris 8 SPARC
>> Solaris 9 SPARC
>> Solaris 10 SPARC
>> Red Hat AS 4 32 Bit (x86)
>> R
mod_perl comes to mind too.
To a lesser extend mod_security and mod_macro.
~Jorge
On Fri, Nov 28, 2008 at 10:06 PM, Ruediger Pluem <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> On 11/28/2008 06:58 PM, Sander Temme wrote:
>>
>> On Nov 28, 2008, at 9:04 AM, Paul Querna wrote:
>>
>>> FYI, I intend to roll 2.3
I'd prefere to have stable bug free (well as little as possible) release,
New feature are nice, but they can wait IMHO.
Just my 2 cents
~Jorge
On Sat, Nov 15, 2008 at 9:50 PM, Ruediger Pluem <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Not that much time has passed since we released 2.2.10 (one month), but
>
cmake seems very interesting.
I'd like to help if you go that path, not sure I'll be of much use though.
~Jorge
On Mon, Nov 3, 2008 at 6:42 PM, Roy T. Fielding <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Nov 3, 2008, at 6:06 AM, Marc Noirot wrote:
>
>> What about going one step further and using a tool
>>
On Mon, Nov 3, 2008 at 10:23 AM, Bing Swen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Jorge Schrauwen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 2008-11-3 16:26
>
>> On Mon, Nov 3, 2008 at 8:10 AM, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
>>
>>> Jorge Schrauwen wrote:
>>>>
>>&g
On Mon, Nov 3, 2008 at 8:10 AM, William A. Rowe, Jr.
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Jorge Schrauwen wrote:
>>
>> The subject of not having an official binary package was brought up.
>> We couldn't think of a reason why not except no body wants or has the
>> tim
hings like the apr-util
mysql driver are still missing. mod_deflate and mod_ssl are included
though.
Jorge Schrauwen
On Thu, Oct 30, 2008 at 10:44 AM, Bing Swen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Jorge Schrauwen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 2008-10-30 17:03
>
> On Thu, Oct 30, 2008 at 5:37 AM, Bing Swen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Paul Querna wrote on 2008-10-30 12:10
>&
On Thu, Oct 30, 2008 at 5:37 AM, Bing Swen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Paul Querna wrote on 2008-10-30 12:10
>
>>
>> Bing Swen wrote:
>>
>>> Paul Querna wrote on 2008-10-28 15:12
>>>
>>> Hope you've included 64-bit Windows in mind. Make x64 Windows a
>>> first-class citizen in httpd-2.4.x, please
On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 9:56 PM, Akins, Brian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
> On 10/29/08 3:40 PM, "Paul Querna" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Of course, maybe that is a good thing, since then they would be ported
> > forward and work on win32 too.
>
> Can you delete open files in win32 yet?? If n
On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 8:28 PM, Graham Leggett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Paul Querna wrote:
>
> One of the things I would like to do on the Simple MPM is unify how child
>> processes are created on win32 and unix.
>>
>> On Win32, there is no fork, so roughly speaking what the current winnt MP
Running stable in a production environment here.
Haven't notice any problems
+1
Jorge
Running fine for 1 day on gentoo.
Can't test on windows due to having no machine available.
~Jorge
On Wed, Oct 8, 2008 at 3:33 PM, Eric Covener <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 8, 2008 at 9:17 AM, Ruediger Pluem <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >
> > On 10/07/2008 08:37 PM, Jim Jagielsk
Hi
There was a discussion on IRC on building minimal static httpd to reduce
memory footprint.
You need a lot of --disable-xyz to do this. Would it be a lot of work to
include something like --minimal-static ?
This may also cater to people who want a simple webserver that only does
some static thi
On Sun, Sep 14, 2008 at 10:09 AM, Bing Swen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote on 2008年8月22日 9:03:
>
>> Which brings me to the other half of [community], I'm proposing we hold
>> an Apache httpd {next} barcamp session for the community who are at
>> ApacheCon BarCamp on Tuesda
On Thu, Aug 21, 2008 at 1:53 PM, Jeff Trawick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 20, 2008 at 6:53 PM, Nick Kew <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>>
>> Any thoughts on dropping it in to trunk
>
>
> Is it best to preserve the current files/filenames (sed.h, libsed.h,
> sed0.c, etc.) to better refle
I like the idea of using --with-SNI and labeling it as experimental.
Maybe leave it of by default though?
~ Jorge
On Wed, Aug 20, 2008 at 1:10 PM, Nick Kew <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 20 Aug 2008 12:06:33 +0200
> Oden Eriksson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > FYI: This patch is applied
Hi,
Something like FXP (for ftp server) for WebDav would indeed be nice.
Although if you are looking to syncronize servers (not sure you are though)
rsync may be a better way.
Jorge
On 7/2/08, Rafa%u0142 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > I imagine most will allow copying to and from local file s
Compiles fine and is working as before on gentoo...
named vhosting still broken though
[ X ] +1 to release as 0.9.2-beta
~Jorge
On Sat, Jun 21, 2008 at 9:17 AM, Takashi Sato <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, 17 Jun 2008 16:43:14 -0500
> "William A. Rowe, Jr." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >
week?)
If around the same state as when I was messing with it I'd say +1 for
beta... it was usable at least as single server. (was using it with FlashFXP
to mess around with it)
I'm not sure how it will cope with heavy usage though.
~Jorge
On Wed, Jun 18, 2008 at 10:23 AM, Jorge Sc
I haven't given the latest source a spin (due to time problems with exams).
Last one I played with seemed to work reasonably well as a single server.
named vhost was broken though (wrowe: how is that coming along? can I give
that another run for its money later this week?)
If around the same stat
On Fri, Jun 13, 2008 at 9:58 PM, Joshua Slive <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 13, 2008 at 3:49 PM, Jorge Schrauwen
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I'd say tomorrow so most mirrors will be synced by then... unless they
> sync
> > very fast... no id
I'd say tomorrow so most mirrors will be synced by then... unless they sync
very fast... no idea how fast that is.
~Jorge
On Fri, Jun 13, 2008 at 9:12 PM, Jim Jagielski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The tarballs and site files are being pushed to the mirrors...
>
> Announce tonight or tomorrow??
To my knowledge default is a catch all kind of thing when done non
namedhosting.
vhost _default_:80
vhost localhost:80
vhost apache.org:80
if the server gets a host header of example.com it goes to _default_...
alteast that is how I understood it... not sure if thats documented
somewhere though.
s are included - very slow upload...
home server)*
I only tested the out of box config.
Jorge
On Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 10:08 AM, Jorge Schrauwen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 9:16 AM, Issac Goldstand <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
>>
>
On Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 9:16 AM, Issac Goldstand <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
>
> Jim Jagielski wrote:
>
>> Test tarballs for Apache httpd 2.2.9 are available at:
>>
>>http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/
>>
>> Your votes please;
>>
>> +/-1
>> [ ] Release httpd-2.2.9 as GA
>>
>>
>>
>> +
On Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 5:22 AM, William A. Rowe, Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Jim Jagielski wrote:
>
>> Your votes please;
>>
>> +/-1
>> [+1] Release httpd-2.2.9 as GA
>>
>
> I'll rely on others to review linux, solaris, et al, but based on Win32 I'm
> very happy and just waiting for feedb
Will try to test it tomorrow... win or linux? I can do both but will only
have time to give it a quick peak on one (exames)
On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 10:33 PM, Jim Jagielski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Still waiting for the sync... I had thought it was every hour... :/
>
>
> On Jun 10, 2008, at 3:
again and hopefull this time somebody will reply.
Kind regards
Jorge Schrauwen (sjorge on #apache)
On Tue, May 6, 2008 at 4:36 PM, Plüm, Rüdiger, VF-Group <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> > -Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
> > Von: Jim Jagielski
> > Gesendet: Dienstag, 6. Mai 2008 15:51
> > An: dev@httpd.apache.org
> > Betreff: Re: 2.2.9
> >
> > I'm back from a few days away and offline, and
Just out of curiosity... will 3.0 still be a fresh start or will the
core of 2.3 be used?
On Sun, Apr 13, 2008 at 8:31 AM, Roy T. Fielding <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Apr 12, 2008, at 7:10 PM, Paul Querna wrote:
>
> > For those who were not there, slides from Roy's keynote at ApacheCon EU:
> >
The slide showing the protocols httpd supports is kind of dead on.
Personaly I like it that I'm able to serve http, ftp,... with one
server package.
If this is they way to go I think in 3.0 a entire new design would
benifit and remove a lot of workaround in forcing the protocols to
work with the
You can allready do that using mod_perl.
It's not exactly what you are looking for but its a nice start:
http://wiki.apache.org/httpd/ApacheVirtualHostMysql
Jorge
On Tue, Apr 8, 2008 at 2:45 PM, Agnello George <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi
> I would like to know if any one has worked on Apache
uld let you build mod_ftp trunk to use with httpd
> trunk.
>
> If you are building mod_ftp to use with httpd 2.2, you only need to fix
> 44653.
>
> -tom-
>
>
>
> Tom Donovan wrote:
>
> > Jorge Schrauwen wrote:
> >
> > > I'l actually not
I'l actually not sure if mod_ftp has a separate list... so I'll send it here.
On the page it says to fetch the trunk and build it.
But the trunk doesn't build!
Adding a message saying it won't build or maybe keep a prelease branch
that does compile and work on trunk so there is a working or atlea
On Thu, Apr 3, 2008 at 4:31 PM, Mads Toftum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 03, 2008 at 10:06:50AM -0400, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> > Time for a 2.4 release? I wouldn't mind pushing that along
> > and get some of the feature-set of 2.4 out before we do too
> > much ripping with the inevita
> ... if we had a config finalize, modules who were prepared to declare
> their config (e.g. mod_vhost declaring the per-host directory merges
> "completed") then as-root, we can finish these out, opening logs with
> full privileges. Other merges will happen at run time (or be optimized
> whe
On Tue, Apr 1, 2008 at 4:13 PM, Issac Goldstand <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
> Jorge Schrauwen wrote:
> > Solutions propose:
> > - lua in the core or atleast in a module
> > - mod_perl
>
> mod_perl exists already. We're looking to replace it
Let me try and summarize this then:
Problem:
The httpd configuration is to static for some users (e.g. large host
providers) they want to have a more dynamic system.
Where they can configure things on a request basis and add vhosts and
such without restarting httpd.
Solutions propose:
- lua in th
I used to use mod_macro, then I moved to mod_perl but like you said.
mod_perl is great (well, more okay than great) for dynamic configurations
that change/get generated on start and not per request.
A new more flexible alternative would be awsome.
Jorge (on vacation)
On Thu, Mar 27, 2008 at 8:58
I've had no problems building with VC9 either, unless you do it on vista
since the new PSDK updates some files and a small edit is needed.
Also x64 building is out of the question for some reason OpenSSL/Zlib nor
httpd itself want to compile at all.
On Wed, Mar 5, 2008 at 10:12 PM, Harry Holt <[E
true but like Roy said if mod_dns is allready in use a new name will
need to be found no?
On Feb 18, 2008 8:42 PM, Issac Goldstand <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
> Jorge Schrauwen wrote:
> > If the mod_dns mentioned before is different from the code... may I
> > su
If the mod_dns mentioned before is different from the code... may I
sugest mod_named? since a lot of people would be famileir with a name
like htat.
On Feb 18, 2008 8:22 PM, Erik Abele <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 18.02.2008, at 20:03, Roy T. Fielding wrote:
>
> > On Feb 9, 2008, at 4:21 PM, Is
Me too, If this gets in experimental I'll probably give it a try
sounds really interesting
On Feb 10, 2008 2:16 PM, Dirk-Willem van Gulik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Feb 10, 2008, at 1:21 AM, Issac Goldstand wrote:
>
> > Any volunteers to import mod_dns so I can eventually start hacking
> >
On 1/11/08, William A. Rowe, Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Jorge Schrauwen wrote:
> >
> > libaprutil is still set to x64 instead of win32 when compiling under
> > 2008 but I take this will get fixed in the win32 src package
>
> No; you set it; that is to say
[] Apache HTTP Server 1.3.41
[] Apache HTTP Server 2.0.63
[+1] Apache HTTP Server 2.2.8 (win32 + mac)
--
~Jorge
+1 on win32 for me if I could vote
libaprutil is still set to x64 instead of win32 when compiling under
2008 but I take this will get fixed in the win32 src package
multicast.c is still broken using vs 2008 with the latest platform
SDK, vs 2005 with the older platform SDK works fine! (there is a p
1 - 100 of 257 matches
Mail list logo
