On Fri, Jun 13, 2008 at 3:49 PM, Jorge Schrauwen
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'd say tomorrow so most mirrors will be synced by then... unless they sync
very fast... no idea how fast that is.
You can see a histogram of last-sync times near the bottom of this page:
http://www.apache.org/mirrors/
On Fri, May 9, 2008 at 8:27 AM, Jeff Trawick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, May 9, 2008 at 6:57 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: trawick
Date: Fri May 9 03:57:46 2008
New Revision: 654752
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=654752view=rev
Log:
backport from trunk:
*) mod_cgid:
On Tue, May 6, 2008 at 1:57 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+note type=warningtitleNote/title
+ pThis directive will be ignored in a name-based virtual host
context./p
+/note
That should just be an ordinary note with no type=.
warning is for really-important stuff like
2008/5/4 Niko Wilfritz Sianipar Sianipar [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
How to get the response time in the apache log file in msec. Thank you.
%D in the logformat string gives you microseconds.
Joshua.
On Wed, Apr 30, 2008 at 5:06 PM, Graham Leggett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The easiest way to do this would be to run a dedicated httpd process for
each application (forming your pool), and then combine them into one
website using a standard reverse proxy configuration.
On Thu, Apr 3, 2008 at 11:29 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: wrowe
Date: Thu Apr 3 08:28:59 2008
New Revision: 644357
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=644357view=rev
Log:
Correct broken configuration in 2.2 - this example didn't run out of the box
+AuthDigestProvider
On Thu, Mar 6, 2008 at 3:05 PM, Jim Jagielski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The advantage of mod_headers is more flexibility that what could
be comfortably added to the proxy module itself as well...
This comes up maybe once or twice a year... I think I'll add
it to my standard Apache 2.2
On Wed, Feb 20, 2008 at 7:45 PM, Chris Stromsoe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
All requests for php in /opt/html authenticate properly but don't set
REMOTE_USER and are logged with r-user == NULL. I'm guessing that's
because the handler is not inside the protected directory.
Feature or bug?
On Feb 5, 2008 5:40 AM, Boyle Owen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Greetings,
Our security guy noticed this alert about a XSS vulnerability in
mod_negotiation: http://www.mindedsecurity.com/MSA01150108.html.
According to the link, it applies to apache = 2.2.6, so no worries for
2.2.8.
However,
On Jan 25, 2008 5:28 PM, Chris H. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Greetings all,
I'm toying with the idea of using PCRE in Apache 1.3.
I see already that there is support for REGEX in the
Configuration.tmpl that permits a choice of bundled
or system (if available). But was wondering how hard,
or if
On Nov 2, 2007 12:41 PM, Shaw, Dan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Good Morning,
We are trying to identify the following and we have received one
response and need to verify.
We are looking for feedback or heck even a solution on the following
In order to get the IP address of the client, instead
On 10/15/07, Marten Lehmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm using httpd-2.2.4. If you don't have an idea, I can maybe track it
down a bit further. But so far this simpelst thing I can explain is:
With a pretty standard httpd.conf there is no long entry unless someone
actually calls a URL. But
On 10/9/07, Jim Jagielski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
All I'm saying is that, iirc, the intent of force-response-1.0 is
to force a 1.0 response and disable keepalives... it was designed
to work around buggy browsers that had problems with 1.1 features,
including wonky 1.0-type keepalives.
No,
On 10/3/07, Roy T. Fielding [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't care what the uptake graph says. I don't care what people
outside this project mailing list think, period, about this project.
And if five years from now there are three or more Apache committers
that want to release 1.3.x, then no
On 10/1/07, Jim Jagielski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I know Roy's already reported the proxy error as bogus, but I think
the OPTIONS * BUGZ report is also bogus. As a test, I assumed that
both www.apache.org and apache.webthing.com are reasonably configured
servers:
www.apache.org is using a
On 10/1/07, William A. Rowe, Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
But I'm rather against breaking this in 2.2 to solve (what are, today)
configuration quirks. Let's get this right for 2.4 and call out the
change very clearly in (our overlong) CHANGES? I'm thinking of a new
second-priority category
On 10/1/07, William A. Rowe, Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Joshua Slive wrote:
Should be in this, rather sparse file:
http://httpd.apache.org/docs/trunk/new_features_2_4.html
But it's not a feature-per say. It's a bugfix, so the name new_features
doesn't tell admins they have to adopt
On 9/26/07, Nick Kew [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We really need to fix this issue of inappropriate DefaultTypes.
An approach that deals with this without loss of back-compatibility
is to hand the decision to systems administrators:
#to suppress setting content-type when the server has no
On 9/20/07, Ashwani Kumar Sharma [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What is httpd –X
See:
http://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.2/programs/httpd.html
Whether I can use this –X option for the deployment.
The better question is: why would you want to?
You mention nothing about what problem you are trying to
On 9/20/07, Ashwani Kumar Sharma [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I want to start the httpd web server through my own application and then I
would like to shut down the web server once I wish to bring my application
down, normally or abnormally (in case).
Will it be fine if I spawn the Apache web
On 9/1/07, Graham Leggett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
I am working on a patch that needs to widen the two bitmaps below, as
they have run out of bits. Would such a change be backport-able to v2.2,
and what kind of MMN bump would it need if so?
I think that'll break the binary API, which
On 8/26/07, Julien Perez [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello everybody,
While setting up a reverse proxy squid + apache w/ mod_expires.c in order to
decrease the load on the web server, I discovered that mod_expires.c was
working by checking the mimetype of the content generated by the web server
On 8/25/07, Roy T. Fielding [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
For standards conformance, I am going to start removing the default
content type settings from trunk tomorrow.
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13986
If you have any problems with that, let them be known here.
+1
On 8/10/07, Rich Bowen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Received this query from a friend and colleague:
... I've been working on an issue at
work, where we're trying to remove some headers from a (proxied)
request. Whilst I was looking for a solution I came across this
patch:
On 8/5/07, Vegard Svanberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* William A. Rowe, Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-08-05 05:15]:
I've looked through the archives, but have not seen this mentioned again
since then. I was wondering if this has been discussed any further,
possibly moved to other mailing
On 8/2/07, Nick Kew [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As for 2.x bugs, there are quite a few which are going to be
harder to deal with. Perhaps we want a new Archived status,
for PRs which have merit but which aren't going to get 'fixed'.
Particularly those with PatchAvailable.
I would just use
On 7/29/07, Graham Leggett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Niklas Edmundsson wrote:
The solution is to NOT rewrite the on-disk headers when the following
conditions are true:
- The body is NOT stale (ie. HTTP_NOT_MODIFIED when revalidating)
- The on-disk header hasn't expired.
- The request
On 6/28/07, Niko Wilfritz Sianipar Sianipar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have some questions about apache configuration:
1. Does apache can be configured so he can order the clients according
to their throughput?
I don't know what you mean by order the clients.
2. How can apache know the
On 6/27/07, Nick Kew [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is a problem that could be solved by documentation.
Maybe not quite as simple, but when the alternative is accepting
new connections whilst running as root.
Here's a start:
http://wiki.apache.org/httpd/Recipes/Privilege_Separation
It could
On 6/27/07, Rici Lake [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If the user servers are listening on high ports, then they can be
started as the user/group rather than as root, and the owner could
have quite a bit of flexibility in configuring their server. It's
quite possible that less reliance on .htaccess
On 6/25/07, William A. Rowe, Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That said, have you considered a design where there are separate pools
of processes per-user, and these would be dispatched after the headers
are processed to the appropriate child?
The simplest option is to simply reuse the features
On 6/20/07, sonia mukherjee [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi All,
could any one give me information on whether any Api call is present with
Apche 2.2 that gives indication that Rwrite Rule is configured for a
particular URL. And if possible with full info on what are the flags that
are set (flags
On 5/24/07, Yoav Shapira [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
On 5/24/07, Craig McClanahan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 5/23/07, William A. Rowe, Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We have a serious issue to determine, and I've asked for a 48 hour cooldown
of wiki.apache.org/httpd/ to make a decision,
On 5/24/07, Rich Bowen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On May 24, 2007, at 04:23, Tony Stevenson wrote:
AskApache has had several email conversations with both myself, and
Rich. In which he was asked politely, but firmly to not use links
to content on his site.
NOTE: NOT because external links
On 5/24/07, William A. Rowe, Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[for infra, who is bcc'ed - three * bullets below]
* ask infra to reopen the wiki to general write access,
* aks infra to please revoke AskApache/their ip from the httpd wiki.
+1.
Cross-posted and already answered on [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 5/23/07, Marco Polo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I need to change a bahaviour on the rewrite of the apache server. Right now,
if I type in a path that does not exist (like /nopage.html) Apache will
serve up the 404 page (/html/404.html),
On 05/12/2007 04:12 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: jim
Date: Sat May 12 07:12:24 2007
New Revision: 537429
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revrev=537429
Log:
Add regex pattern matching to ProxyPass, allowing,
for example:
ProxyPass ~ \.gif balancer://imagecluster
On
On 5/2/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: bnicholes
Date: Wed May 2 09:31:39 2007
New Revision: 534533
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revrev=534533
Log:
re-introduce ap_satisfies API back into core and modify how the access_checker,
check_user_id and auth_checker
On 5/2/07, Brad Nicholes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yeah, that's where I mentioned that things might look a little confusing.
There actually is a good reason to have both and yes some of the functionality
can overlap. The reason for having mod_authz_host is so that host, IP, ENV,
etc. can
On 4/27/07, Brad Nicholes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It's beginning to look like Order, Allow, Deny, Satisfy can't be deprecated after all.
However I still think that there is a usefulness for the same type of authorization rules
defined by require.
I don't really understand why you say
On 4/27/07, FORAMITTI Laurent [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So I would like to know how is it possible to configure Apache to send some
informations about the authenticated user to my AppServer ?
Is it possible to add some values to the http header before that the mod_jk
or mod_wl forward the
On 4/27/07, Patrick Welche [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I expected not to be prompted to login by the above configuration.
(also tried AuthBasicAuthoritative Off, and have read the fine manual..)
Just to eliminate the obvious, have you actually checked the
access_log to verify that the IP
On 3/26/07, Joe Schaefer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Since forever, the documentation for Order claims this:
Yes, it's broken. It hasn't been that way forever, just since we tried
to improve the Order docs last year. I don't think a patch is really
necessary -- it is an easy enough fix. I'll see
On 3/23/07, System Support [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Randomly the mime-type of my .css files changes from text/css to
text/plain.
There were a couple of similar bugs reported against caching, but they
are shown as being fixed. I did try disabling caching, but it did not
seem to help.
I
On 3/21/07, Jan van den Berg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://httpd.apache.org/dev/patches.html
So who keeps this page up to date? Any reason why this info isn't yet
updated?
Because nobody has submitted a patch. (Kind of a circular problem, I
realize ;-)
Feel free to contribute.
Joshua.
On 3/15/07, Torsten Foertsch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The bug is simple, the patch is simple. Why haven't I got a single reply to my
mail? The bug is also still marked as new. What is the right way to report
problems?
You're doing fine. See:
http://httpd.apache.org/dev/patches.html#ignored
I just deleted all our binary releases from before 2005 that were
sitting in our recommended releases directory. They are, of course,
all still available from archive.apache.org.
With the exception of a few platforms, we just aren't in the business
of providing binaries anymore. I don't think
On 3/6/07, Joost de Heer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Xavier Beaudouin schreef:
Hello,
I am trying to find a portable way to find what is the version of apache
during compilation of a third party module.
In include/ap_release.h, the macros AP_SERVER_MAJORVERSION_NUMBER,
On 3/5/07, Erica Zhang [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I want to cache the responses for XMLHttpRequest, that is dynamic
content. I have configureed http.conf using Expires to add headers to
those responses. However, I still could not find those responses to be
able to be cached by use of web
On 2/26/07, Erica Zhang [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I am developing some component, which need Apache to be able to listen
to two ports, instead of only one default port. I do not know if there
is some way to configure Apache http server to work in this way. I do
not want to configure it to be
On 2/13/07, Nick Kew [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Location /limited/ methods=GET POST HEAD
I like that a lot. It makes it clear that methods is an option (and
hence doesn't generally need to be there), and skirts the whole
ordering mess you get by adding a Method container.
Directory /dir/
On 2/12/07, Dziugas Baltrunas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm trying to figure out the way how to put information in access log
(via mod_log_config) whether the request was a cache hit or miss
(similar to what squid does - TCP_MISS and TCP_HIT). I think this
information is necessary for any proxy
On 2/8/07, Greg Sims [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This consumption of server resource by one user is unfair to everyone else
trying to use http at the same time. Is it possible to control resource
allocation so that it is fair to all users?
The user in question is using some kind of download
On 2/8/07, Greg Sims [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This consumption of resource seems unfair to other users that are trying to
use the system at the same time. Is it possible to control resource
allocation so that it is fair to all users?
Is there something about the response I made to your
On 2/8/07, Joshua Slive [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 2/8/07, Greg Sims [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This consumption of resource seems unfair to other users that are trying to
use the system at the same time. Is it possible to control resource
allocation so that it is fair to all users
On 12/11/06, Fenlason, Josh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is there any way Apache could do the following?
1. Search for a match in the language and language-locale list
the client provides
2. If no match was found above, strip off the locale and try
again.
3. If there still
On 12/11/06, Fenlason, Josh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I swear that's the behavior I was seeing, but I must have had something
messed up. I just tested to verify my complaint and it appears to be
working the way I said I wanted it to. Not sure what I messed up, but I
must have gotten confused
Following up on a question on the users list, I found this blog entry:
http://blogs.msdn.com/ie/archive/2006/10/17/accept-language-header-for-internet-explorer-7.aspx
which says that IE7 now uses only language/locale pairs in the
Accept-Language header.
They follow this up with:
If a given
On 12/6/06, Jeff Trawick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We're up to two great answers to disable some output from the server
that isn't required by the HTTP protocol anyway:
1) modify the source
2) install third-party module
My support for the idea has nothing to do with improving the operation
of
On 12/5/06, Joe Orton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Dec 05, 2006 at 06:39:30AM -0500, Jeff Trawick wrote:
A lot of opinions were offered back in August. Some were negative but
I don't see anything that looks like a veto.
On 11/29/06, Graham Leggett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, November 29, 2006 2:19 pm, Nick Kew wrote:
When the configuration is merged, the one that appears later in
httpd.conf overrides the other where there is conflict.
What constitutes a conflict?
What Satisfy value are you using?
On 10/24/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+ dtcodesem/code/dt
+ ddThis directive tells the SSL Module to pick the best semaphore
+ implementation available to it, choosing between Posix and SystemV IPC,
+ in that order. It is only available when the underlying
On 9/24/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: niq
Date: Sun Sep 24 15:29:59 2006
New Revision: 449514
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revrev=449514
Log:
Add extra explanatory clause to VirtualHost docs
Modified:
httpd/httpd/branches/2.2.x/docs/manual/mod/core.xml
On 9/1/06, William A. Rowe, Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Project Committee Members...
Adopt [EMAIL PROTECTED], seeded from [EMAIL PROTECTED]
current subscribers, for module authors to use for peer developer support?
(API 'users', essentially.)
+1
Joshua.
On 8/28/06, Henk Fictorie [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
We tried to upgrade our Apache server from 2.0.55 to 2.0.59. For HTTP
traffic this was successful. However for HTTPS the server would hang after a
couple of hours (serveral hundred thousands request). Our HTTP and HTTPS
servers are
On 8/25/06, Rainer Jung [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I put the code up on http://people.apache.org/~rjung/mod_define/
Comments are welcome.
For big sites and well trained admins having an external tool like m4,
scripting languages, ant etc. might be the better way to use config
templates.
But for
On 8/22/06, hbeaumont hbeaumont [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Are there any obvious flaws?
Horrible performance?
Thanks for any comments or direction to a better place to ask.
Search the archives of this list and the users list for any thread
mentioning perchild. You'll find the challenges
On 8/20/06, Carsten Wiedmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You have some examples?
http://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2003-0017
A HTTP server must process the abs_path from an URI in a case-sensitive
manner. Thus with a case-sensitive filesystem it's enough to build a
canonical /
On 8/20/06, Guy Hulbert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, 2006-20-08 at 08:36 -0400, Joshua Slive wrote:
But why is there the Directive ScriptAlias?
-- This Directive should then better be removed.
It could easily be removed. It is a convenience directive for the
Not if you don't want
On 8/20/06, Lars Eilebrecht [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
For offering such an option with Apache I've only seen two arguments:
1. Making the server more secure by not revealing any (or fake)
server information.
2. Saving bandwidth.
3. Make all the crazy people go away. There may be no
On 8/19/06, Carsten Wiedmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Why is it really bad to have a ScriptAlias inside the DocumentRoot? It's
only another file system location. And it's only one line in the config file
instead of four. You have only a problem because of the unexpected
behavior of httpd with
On 8/19/06, Carsten Wiedmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[I don't agree with large chunks of what you wrote, but the crux of
the matter is here:]
And why are sometimes (part of) the URI is case-sensitive and somtimes not
and what happens in consequence because of this behavior. And this behavior
On 8/18/06, Mark J Cox [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
See
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=bugtraqm=115527423727441w=2
which basically reports if you put cgi-bin under docroot then you can
view cgi scripts on OS which have case insensitive filesystems
Joe replied:
On 8/18/06, Carsten Wiedmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Joshua Slive schrieb:
On 8/18/06, Mark J Cox [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think the right response here is to make it more explicit in the
documentation that putting a ScriptAlias cgi-bin inside document root is
bad.
Yes
On 8/12/06, Eli Marmor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
But if this option is a so strong dream for somebody, the minimum that
can be done to help a little, is a strong recommendation against using
this option, in the documentation.
I'm +1 on the concept for this patch (I haven't reviewed the code).
On 8/11/06, Silvio Mazzaro [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Guy Hulbert wrote:
What is the problem you are trying to solve ?
I'd like to know who's using sendmail from the Web.
This is a hint ... do you want to prevent CGI scripts from calling
sendmail ?
No, It's important for my users to use
On 8/11/06, Guy Hulbert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 2006-11-08 at 09:47 -0400, Joshua Slive wrote:
On 8/11/06, Silvio Mazzaro [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Guy Hulbert wrote:
What is the problem you are trying to solve ?
I'd like to know who's using sendmail from the Web.
snip
On 8/1/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: bnicholes
Date: Tue Aug 1 15:54:38 2006
New Revision: 427780
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=427780view=rev
Log:
Converted the reject directive to be definitive and enabled directory_merge to
merge all of the authorization
On 7/23/06, William A. Rowe, Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
@@ServerRoot@@ doesn't guarantee that either :-/ grrr - please don't
start commit wars by reverting without some small post to discuss?
Here's the reply I sent to your original commit (msgid
[EMAIL PROTECTED]). I
didn't receive a
On 6/1/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Add example/default allow-from for localhost, please???
Location /server-status
SetHandler server-status
Require host .example.com
+Allow from 127
/Location
I think you are looking for
Require ip 127
or something like
On 6/1/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ewww... can't we be consistant with our workfiles paths?
-DavLockDB @@ServerRoot@@/var/DavLock
+DavLockDB @exp_runtimedir@/DavLock
I believe the issue here is that exp_runtimedir is writable only by
root, while DavLockDB needs to be
On 6/1/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: wrowe
Date: Wed May 31 22:42:13 2006
New Revision: 410761
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=410761view=rev
Log:
That's the point, isn't it? All mpm's in one basket?
Sure, but windows has its own config file where we left
On 5/25/06, Rich Bowen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The folks at Drupal have apparently just discovered that
something.php.bar is executed as PHP, and, thus, checking to see if a
file ends with .php is not sufficient to ensure that their file upload
feature can't be exploited.
In fact, they have a
On 5/18/06, pradeep kumar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Is there any other way of getting PATH_INFO without using mod_include?
More details please. PATH_INFO works find in 2.x. Perhaps you need
to look at the AllowPathInfo directive.
Joshua.
On 5/10/06, Tiago Semprebom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
I'm developing a new handler module in apache, in this module I need to do
some changes in the incoming requests, like change the request priority, for
example: I need to intercept the request and in some away to change or set a
On 5/8/06, Joseph Dane [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Joshua Slive [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
In very early versions of the Apache HTTP Server, the
directiveAddType/directive directive was also used to activate
special server-side processing (such as modulemod_include/module
or PHP) by assigning
On 5/3/06, Joe Orton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, May 03, 2006 at 02:39:33PM +0200, Niklas Edmundsson wrote:
I've run into apr_brigade_insert_file() creating brigades that's not
possible to sendfile() (EINVAL), this is with httpd-2.2.2 on Ubuntu
Breezy Linux amd64 (64bit). The file in
On 4/28/06, Justin Erenkrantz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 4/27/06, Joshua Slive [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I know there are people who still hold the idealistic view that we
shouldn't be obscuring email addresses at all. Although I agree in
principle, I think the world has passed that view
This type of request is becoming more and more common.
Although mod_mbox obscures the basic to and from address, there are
still two problems:
1. It doesn't obscure email addresses in the body of the message
(which could be from forwarded/quoted messages).
2. The raw link still gives access to
On 4/24/06, Swapan Gupta [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I am using Apache 2.0.53. I am observing that when a 304 Not Modified
response is returned accompanied by the Location header, the
Location does not reach the user.
I could see that this header is not mentioned in the RFC for 304
On 4/21/06, Roy T. Fielding [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't know of any reason to hurry a 2.0.x release (heck, I don't
know of any reason to continue its development), but I also don't think
releasing one with modified copyright years is any more or less legal
than continuing to distribute
On 4/20/06, Matthias Behrens [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
thx
doesnt seem to work on 2.0
its a 2.2 feature isnt it?
The early option, which may be necessary here, is a 2.2 feature.
Joshua.
On 4/18/06, Matthias Behrens [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
hi
is there a way to overwrite the HTTP_X_FORWARDED_FOR instead of adding to
it?
the problem is that the content of this headerline is sometimes totally
chaotic so its very difficult to parse.
other possible solutions would be:
- to
On 3/6/06, Graham Leggett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
I have just tried to convince httpd v2.2.0 to password protect a single
file on the filesystem, but without any success.
Does anybody know whether this is possible?
I tried
Location /cgi-bin/dir/file.cgi
and
Files
On 2/25/06, Arshad Ahamad [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello all,
I have configure Apache-2.0.48 successfully.Now I would like to
integrate Apache-2.0.48 and existing server. So I am unable to start this
work ,I am too much confused either Apache embedded into the existing server
OR
On 2/17/06, Joost de Heer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
'Breaking a config file' is IMO that you can't just copy your 2.0 config file
and it works. And the new mod_auth(n|z) structure just did that: A 2.0 config
file needed changes to work in 2.2.
Only if you are using dynamically loaded modules.
On 2/16/06, David Reid [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Rather than try and piece it together, can someone simply answer this
simple question? Maybe then this mail and your reply will help other
poor souls trying to make the change.
Convert this
Order deny,allow
Deny from all
Require all denied
On 2/16/06, Graham Leggett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ian Holsman wrote:
maybe if mod_access_compat is included by default statically into httpd
itself? (unless explicitly disabled)
we could make it optional in 2.6 (and remove docs on it), and remove in
2.8 or something. this will give
On 2/10/06, David Reid [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Joshua Slive wrote:
On 1/26/06, Ian Holsman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Joshua:
httpd.conf.in has the new structure
httpd-std.conf (the one I was looking at) didn't ;(
Hmmm... httpd-std.conf doesn't exist in trunk.
Just ran
I hadn't checked in a while, but there seem to be lots of mod_mbox
cores on ajax again. Here's one backtrace:
#0 mbox_cte_escape_html (p=0x60343ca8,
s=0x602f5a68
--_=_NextPart_001_01C3C08D.F854E1E0\nContent-Type:
text/html;Content-Transfer-Encoding:
1 - 100 of 597 matches
Mail list logo
