Re: t/modules/buffer.t failing in 2.4.36, LWP bug [Was: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.36]

2018-10-16 Thread Ruediger Pluem
On 10/14/2018 04:20 PM, Mark Blackman wrote: > > >> On 14 Oct 2018, at 12:33, Rainer Jung > > wrote: >> >> Am 13.10.2018 um 11:46 schrieb Rainer Jung: >>> Am 11.10.2018 um 20:55 schrieb Ruediger Pluem: On 10/11/2018 08:10 PM, Christophe JAILLET

Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.36

2018-10-15 Thread Jim Jagielski
> On Oct 15, 2018, at 10:20 AM, Stefan Eissing > wrote: > > > >> Am 15.10.2018 um 16:11 schrieb Jim Jagielski : >> >> It's up to the RM on whether or not to release... one can't veto a release >> and a -1 is not a veto. > > Huh? I was referring to "TLS 1.3 support isn't quite yet tested

Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.36

2018-10-15 Thread Daniel Ruggeri
Hi, all; As a result of testing and further analysis of this release, I am calling this release dead on the vine and shall not pursue publishing it. We have -1 votes based on the recently discovered OpenSSL 1.1.1 behavior change [1]. Although this tag shall not become a release, I'd like to

Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.36

2018-10-15 Thread Daniel Gruno
On 10/15/2018 04:20 PM, Stefan Eissing wrote: Am 15.10.2018 um 16:11 schrieb Jim Jagielski : It's up to the RM on whether or not to release... one can't veto a release and a -1 is not a veto. Huh? I was referring to "TLS 1.3 support isn't quite yet tested enough to warrant a public

Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.36

2018-10-15 Thread Stefan Eissing
> Am 15.10.2018 um 16:11 schrieb Jim Jagielski : > > It's up to the RM on whether or not to release... one can't veto a release > and a -1 is not a veto. Huh? I was referring to "TLS 1.3 support isn't quite yet tested enough to warrant a public release". I wanted to point out that without

Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.36

2018-10-15 Thread Jim Jagielski
It's up to the RM on whether or not to release... one can't veto a release and a -1 is not a veto. > On Oct 15, 2018, at 10:07 AM, Stefan Eissing > wrote: > > > >> Am 15.10.2018 um 15:58 schrieb Jim Jagielski : >> >> Considering all this, I am changing my vote from a +1 to a -1. I was not

Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.36

2018-10-15 Thread Stefan Eissing
> Am 15.10.2018 um 15:58 schrieb Jim Jagielski : > > Considering all this, I am changing my vote from a +1 to a -1. I was not able > to trigger this error, but this shows, at least IMO, that TLS 1.3 support > isn't quite yet tested enough to warrant a public release, unless we are > super

Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.36

2018-10-15 Thread Jim Jagielski
Considering all this, I am changing my vote from a +1 to a -1. I was not able to trigger this error, but this shows, at least IMO, that TLS 1.3 support isn't quite yet tested enough to warrant a public release, unless we are super clear that it is "experimental" or "early access"... > On Oct

Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.36

2018-10-15 Thread Stefan Eissing
> Am 15.10.2018 um 15:51 schrieb William A Rowe Jr : > > > > On Mon, Oct 15, 2018 at 3:06 AM Stefan Eissing > wrote: > > See my mail on the other thread. It seems that h2 traffic triggers a call > sequence that exposes a change in OpenSSL behaviour of SSL_read() between > 1.1.0 and

Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.36

2018-10-15 Thread William A Rowe Jr
On Mon, Oct 15, 2018 at 3:06 AM Stefan Eissing wrote: > > See my mail on the other thread. It seems that h2 traffic triggers a call > sequence that exposes a change in OpenSSL behaviour of SSL_read() between > 1.1.0 and 1.1.1. It looks as if mod_ssl interpreted the return codes of > SSL_read()

Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.36

2018-10-15 Thread Stefan Eissing
> Am 14.10.2018 um 23:46 schrieb Daniel Ruggeri : > > Hi, Helmut; > Note that the vote may run longer than 72 hours as 72 is the minimum. As it > stands now, we have more than 3 binding +1 votes, but I am waiting for > closure on the conversation on-list about the tests with reported H2/TLS

Re: t/modules/buffer.t failing in 2.4.36, LWP bug [Was: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.36]

2018-10-14 Thread Rainer Jung
Am 15.10.2018 um 02:37 schrieb William A Rowe Jr: On Sun, Oct 14, 2018, 18:47 Rainer Jung > wrote: On the contrary, the http2 tests (other thread) fail for me also with curl or browser, but only when the server is build with OpenSSL 1.1.1

Re: t/modules/buffer.t failing in 2.4.36, LWP bug [Was: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.36]

2018-10-14 Thread William A Rowe Jr
On Sun, Oct 14, 2018, 18:47 Rainer Jung wrote: > > On the contrary, the http2 tests (other thread) fail for me also with > curl or browser, but only when the server is build with OpenSSL 1.1.1 > (independent of TLS version used). > Goes without saying... But this browser and curl are both built

Re: t/modules/buffer.t failing in 2.4.36, LWP bug [Was: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.36]

2018-10-14 Thread Rainer Jung
Hi Daniel, Am 14.10.2018 um 23:30 schrieb Daniel Ruggeri: On 2018/10/14 11:33:08, Rainer Jung wrote: > Am 13.10.2018 um 11:46 schrieb Rainer Jung:> > > Am 11.10.2018 um 20:55 schrieb Ruediger Pluem:> > >>> > >>> > >> On 10/11/2018 08:10 PM, Christophe JAILLET wrote:> > >>> No issue on

Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.36

2018-10-14 Thread Dennis Clarke
On 10/14/2018 05:46 PM, Daniel Ruggeri wrote: Hi, Helmut; Note that the vote may run longer than 72 hours as 72 is the minimum. As it stands now, we have more than 3 binding +1 votes, but I am waiting for closure on the conversation on-list about the tests with reported H2/TLS 1.3 failures.

Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.36

2018-10-14 Thread Daniel Ruggeri
Hi, Helmut; Note that the vote may run longer than 72 hours as 72 is the minimum. As it stands now, we have more than 3 binding +1 votes, but I am waiting for closure on the conversation on-list about the tests with reported H2/TLS 1.3 failures. Since this is one of the primary features of

Re: t/modules/buffer.t failing in 2.4.36, LWP bug [Was: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.36]

2018-10-14 Thread Mark Blackman
> On 14 Oct 2018, at 12:33, Rainer Jung wrote: > > Am 13.10.2018 um 11:46 schrieb Rainer Jung: >> Am 11.10.2018 um 20:55 schrieb Ruediger Pluem: >>> >>> >>> On 10/11/2018 08:10 PM, Christophe JAILLET wrote: No issue on my Ubuntu 18.04 VM. On what configuration are you running

t/modules/buffer.t failing in 2.4.36, LWP bug [Was: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.36]

2018-10-14 Thread Rainer Jung
Am 13.10.2018 um 11:46 schrieb Rainer Jung: Am 11.10.2018 um 20:55 schrieb Ruediger Pluem: On 10/11/2018 08:10 PM, Christophe JAILLET wrote: No issue on my Ubuntu 18.04 VM. On what configuration are you running your tests, Rüdiger? macOS, just like Jim? Centos 7.5 64 Bit Regards

Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.36

2018-10-13 Thread denradford
+1 FreeBSD 11.2-RELEASE-p4 security/openssl111 - 1.1.1_1 Hosting several live sites without errors or issues on this release candidate. TLSv1.3 successfully negotiated for capable browsers. Regards, Dennis

Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.36

2018-10-13 Thread Rainer Jung
ger, Vodafone Group wrote: Do you know if the failure is a regression over 2.4.35? Regards Rüdiger Von: Marion et Christophe JAILLET Gesendet: Donnerstag, 11. Oktober 2018 13:13 An: dev@httpd.apache.org Betreff: re: AW: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.36 Waouh! This would mean I've p

Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.36

2018-10-11 Thread Christophe JAILLET
Le 10/10/2018 à 21:18, Daniel Ruggeri a écrit : Hi, all;    Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/httpd/ I would like to call a VOTE over the next few days to release this candidate tarball as 2.4.36: [X] +1: It's not just good,

Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.36

2018-10-11 Thread Ruediger Pluem
ne Group >>> wrote: >>> >>> Do you know if the failure is a regression over 2.4.35? >>> Regards >>> Rüdiger >>> Von: Marion et Christophe JAILLET >>> Gesendet: Donnerstag, 11. Oktober 2018 13:13 >>> An: dev@httpd.apache.org &

Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.36

2018-10-11 Thread Christophe JAILLET
Message du 11/10/18 10:08 De : "Plüm, Rüdiger, Vodafone Group" A : "dev@httpd.apache.org" Copie à : Objet : AW: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.36 Anyone else seeing t/modules/buffer.t (Wstat: 0 Tests: 12 Failed: 2) Failed tests: 8, 12 ? I don't see this with trunk on the

Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.36

2018-10-11 Thread Joe Orton
On Wed, Oct 10, 2018 at 02:18:45PM -0500, Daniel Ruggeri wrote: > Hi, all; >Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures: > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/httpd/ > > I would like to call a VOTE over the next few days to release this candidate > tarball as 2.4.36: >

Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.36

2018-10-11 Thread Jim Jagielski
508) >> >> >> >> :) >> >> >> >> I definitely need to document how to generate and use test-coverage data >> when running the test framework. >> >> This helps to spot where new tests are needed. >> >> >> >

Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.36

2018-10-11 Thread Jim Jagielski
> Rüdiger > > Von: Marion et Christophe JAILLET > Gesendet: Donnerstag, 11. Oktober 2018 13:13 > An: dev@httpd.apache.org > Betreff: re: AW: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.36 > > Waouh! > > > > This would mean I've provided a new

re: AW: AW: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.36

2018-10-11 Thread Marion et Christophe JAILLET
to a change of behavior in this area.   CJ   > Message du 11/10/18 13:15 > De : "Plüm, Rüdiger, Vodafone Group" > A : "dev@httpd.apache.org" > Copie à : > Objet : AW: AW: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.36 > > Do you know if the failure is a regression over 2

AW: AW: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.36

2018-10-11 Thread Plüm , Rüdiger , Vodafone Group
Do you know if the failure is a regression over 2.4.35? Regards Rüdiger Von: Marion et Christophe JAILLET Gesendet: Donnerstag, 11. Oktober 2018 13:13 An: dev@httpd.apache.org Betreff: re: AW: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.36 Waouh! This would mean I've provided a new useful test! (it has

re: AW: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.36

2018-10-11 Thread Marion et Christophe JAILLET
du 11/10/18 10:08 > De : "Plüm, Rüdiger, Vodafone Group" > A : "dev@httpd.apache.org" > Copie à : > Objet : AW: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.36 > > Anyone else seeing > > t/modules/buffer.t (Wstat: 0 Tests: 12 Failed: 2) > Failed tests: 8, 12 > >

Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.36

2018-10-11 Thread Stefan Eissing
+1 * macOS 10.14.0, XCode 10, OpenSSL 1.0.2: mod_http2, mod_md tests pass * macOS 10.14.0, XCode 10, OpenSSL 1.1.1: mod_http2, mod_md tests pass * ubuntu 18.04 LTS, gcc 7.3.0, openssl 1.1.0g: mod_http2 tests pass > Am 10.10.2018 um 21:18 schrieb Daniel Ruggeri : > > Hi, all; > Please find

AW: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.36

2018-10-11 Thread Plüm , Rüdiger , Vodafone Group
uggeri > Gesendet: Donnerstag, 11. Oktober 2018 02:27 > An: dev@httpd.apache.org > Betreff: Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.36 > > +1 from me (talking to myself). > > Test environment follows. I observe only one failure of the test suite > (mentioned elsewhere) - it seems

Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.36

2018-10-10 Thread Daniel Ruggeri
+1 from me (talking to myself). Test environment follows. I observe only one failure of the test suite (mentioned elsewhere) - it seems only to apply w/ OpenSSL 1.1.1 and H2. system:   kernel:     name: Linux     release: 3.16.0-4-amd64     version: #1 SMP Debian 3.16.51-3 (2017-12-13)    

Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.36

2018-10-10 Thread Jim Jagielski
+1: o macOS 10.13.6, Xcode 10, OpenSSL 1.1.1 o CentOS 5&6, OpenSSL 1.0.2, 64bit Will try to test against CentOS7 and Ubuntu 14.04LTS tomorrow Thx for RMing! > On Oct 10, 2018, at 3:18 PM, Daniel Ruggeri wrote: > > Hi, all; > Please find below the proposed release tarball and

[VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.36

2018-10-10 Thread Daniel Ruggeri
Hi, all; Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/httpd/ I would like to call a VOTE over the next few days to release this candidate tarball as 2.4.36: [ ] +1: It's not just good, it's good enough! [ ] +0: Let's have a talk. [ ]