Thanks for testing. The attached patch cleanly applies to 2.2.x and also
contains a backport of r527937.
Regards
Rüdiger
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Auftrag von Vinicius Petrucci
Gesendet: Dienstag, 11. September 2007 03:11
An: dev@httpd.apache.org
Betreff:
On Mon, Sep 10, 2007 at 09:47:24PM +0200, Ruediger Pluem wrote:
On 09/10/2007 08:40 AM, Plüm wrote:
That was the goal of my diagnostic patch: Finding out if we have a pool
issue. Looks like we have. I guess the right fix is as you say
to use the parent pool (process scope).
Not 100%
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Joe Orton
Gesendet: Dienstag, 11. September 2007 11:35
An: dev@httpd.apache.org
Betreff: Re: AW: SSL_VERSION_LIBRARY
On Mon, Sep 10, 2007 at 09:47:24PM +0200, Ruediger Pluem wrote:
On 09/10/2007 08:40 AM, Plüm wrote:
That was the goal of my
On 9/10/07, Ashwani Kumar Sharma [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In my application I am spawning httpd.exe from the parent process.
...
My requirement is that:
...
In the Abnormal termination of the parent process. The Apache should keep
looking for its parent process. If the parent process is not
Hi Jeff,
Thanks for your reply.
The httpd.exe of Apache web server has two processes running in windows.
When we kill the parent httpd.exe the child httpd.exe is still running and
listening to the web request. I don't want this.
I want to modify this in such a way that if I kill the parent
Hi Jeff,
Thanks for your reply.
The httpd.exe of Apache web server has two processes running in windows.
When we kill the parent httpd.exe the child httpd.exe is still running and
listening to the web request. I don't want this.
I want to modify this in such a way that if I kill the parent
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: niq
Date: Sat Sep 8 05:46:10 2007
New Revision: 573831
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=573831view=rev
Log:
Add option to escape backreferences in RewriteRule.
PR 34602 and PR 39746
Patch by Guenther Gsenger
Modified:
On Mon, 10 Sep 2007 19:09:25 -0400
Jeff McAdams [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I look forward to being able to answering any questions about our
desires and hope to see some discussion and progress on an SNMP
implementation. If people think some financial support would be
helpful in bringing this
Tested in 2.2.6 ...
Thanks Rüdiger ! :)
On 11/09/2007, Plüm, Rüdiger, VF-Group [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks for testing. The attached patch cleanly applies to 2.2.x and also
contains a backport of r527937.
Regards
Rüdiger
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
What with this and the Win32/apr issues, seems to me that
we should consider a 2.2.7 out soonish :)
On Tue, 11 Sep 2007 15:11:35 +0200
André Malo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: niq
Date: Sat Sep 8 05:46:10 2007
New Revision: 573831
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=573831view=rev
Log:
Add option to escape backreferences in RewriteRule.
PR
* Nick Kew wrote:
On Tue, 11 Sep 2007 15:11:35 +0200
André Malo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: niq
Date: Sat Sep 8 05:46:10 2007
New Revision: 573831
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=573831view=rev
Log:
Add option to escape
Plüm wrote:
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: jean-frederic clere
Gesendet: Montag, 10. September 2007 16:38
An: dev@httpd.apache.org
Betreff: Re: svn commit: r573264 -
/httpd/httpd/trunk/include/scoreboard.h
Jim Jagielski wrote:
On Sep 10, 2007, at 6:37 AM, Plüm, Rüdiger,
On Sep 11, 2007, at 12:09 PM, jean-frederic clere wrote:
1. IMHO requires a minor bump.
Find a patch that covers all the points you raised below.
More comments?
Requires a major bump. Also destroys all those mystical
other balancers from working as-is, since they
must now be not only
On Tue, 11 Sep 2007 18:10:57 +0200
André Malo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
A further improvement, round tuits permitting, would indeed be
to look deeper, and eliminate any duplication.
It should be done before considering backport, IMHO.
Yep, guess so. I think I just put a proposal in STATUS
This is my first message to this list. Hope I'm sending to the right place.
I'm trying to get favicon.ico to work.
I'm running Apache 1.3.33 on AIX 5.3. To avoid confusion, I picked up a working
favicon.ico from another site and dropped it into the root (virtual) directory.
I did some research
Jim Jagielski wrote:
On Sep 11, 2007, at 12:09 PM, jean-frederic clere wrote:
1. IMHO requires a minor bump.
Find a patch that covers all the points you raised below.
More comments?
Requires a major bump. Also destroys all those mystical
other balancers from working as-is, since
On Sep 11, 2007, at 12:44 PM, jean-frederic clere wrote:
Jim Jagielski wrote:
On Sep 11, 2007, at 12:09 PM, jean-frederic clere wrote:
1. IMHO requires a minor bump.
Find a patch that covers all the points you raised below.
More comments?
Requires a major bump. Also destroys all
Nick Kew wrote:
On Mon, 10 Sep 2007 19:09:25 -0400
Jeff McAdams [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I look forward to being able to answering any questions about our
desires and hope to see some discussion and progress on an SNMP
implementation. If people think some financial support would be
helpful
On Sep 11, 2007, at 1:11 PM, Jeff McAdams wrote:
For the benefit of the list...if there are other developers, in
addition
to Nick, that might be interested in taking a look at this project and
tackling it, let me know and we can certainly talk.
I actually work for a company which is
On Sep 11, 2007, at 12:09 PM, jean-frederic clere wrote:
AP_DECLARE(lb_score *) ap_get_scoreboard_lb(int lb_num)
{
-if (((lb_num 0) || (lb_limit lb_num))) {
+char *ptr;
+if (((lb_num 0) || (lb_limit lb_num)) || worker_size==0) {
return(NULL); /* Out of range */
What happens if you go to another box and do a
curl -I http://www.yoursite.com/favicon.ico
and/or
curl -i http://www.yoursite.com/favicon.ico
[Try this on google or yahoo if you want to see what should happen.]
On 9/11/07, Ashwani Kumar Sharma [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Jeff,
Thanks for your reply.
The httpd.exe of Apache web server has two processes running in windows.
When we kill the parent httpd.exe the child httpd.exe is still running and
listening to the web request. I don't want this.
For debugging a windows build, is there a simple change to the Apache
build/workspace that will print all the cl.exe/link.exe invocations?
FWIW I'm using VC6 and my build is kicked off as below:
msdev apache.dsw /MAKE BuildBin Win32 Release
I see that sometimes while poking around in individual
Can someone with appropriate permissions please add version 2.2.6 to bugzilla
such
that bug reports can be done correctly? Thanks.
Regards
Rüdiger
On 09/11/2007 06:09 PM, jean-frederic clere wrote:
Plüm wrote:
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: jean-frederic clere
Gesendet: Montag, 10. September 2007 16:38
An: dev@httpd.apache.org
Betreff: Re: svn commit: r573264 -
/httpd/httpd/trunk/include/scoreboard.h
Jim Jagielski wrote:
On 09/11/2007 06:23 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
On Sep 11, 2007, at 12:09 PM, jean-frederic clere wrote:
1. IMHO requires a minor bump.
Find a patch that covers all the points you raised below.
More comments?
Requires a major bump. Also destroys all those mystical
Curious again. Why
On Sep 11, 2007, at 4:04 PM, Ruediger Pluem wrote:
On 09/11/2007 06:23 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
On Sep 11, 2007, at 12:09 PM, jean-frederic clere wrote:
1. IMHO requires a minor bump.
Find a patch that covers all the points you raised below.
More comments?
Requires a major bump.
Why doesn't j-f go ahead and commit the revised patch
to trunk and we can address our concerns in the code
instead of email :)
On 09/11/2007 10:18 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
On Sep 11, 2007, at 4:04 PM, Ruediger Pluem wrote:
On 09/11/2007 06:23 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
On Sep 11, 2007, at 12:09 PM, jean-frederic clere wrote:
1. IMHO requires a minor bump.
Find a patch that covers all the points you raised
On Sep 11, 2007, at 4:39 PM, Ruediger Pluem wrote:
it will fail to compile after the patch, because lb_score is now an
incomplete type. So I guess in order to keep it backportable we
need to stick with
typedef struct lb_score lb_score;
struct lb_score {
unsigned char data[1024];
};
On 09/11/2007 10:51 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
I would also suggest that we keep ap_proxy_lb_workers
in proxy_util.c (as it currently is), since even
though its not part of the API, other proxy module
make have a need for it (and again, keeping the
number of changes to a minimum).
+1.
On Sep 11, 2007, at 5:01 PM, Ruediger Pluem wrote:
On 09/11/2007 10:51 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
I would also suggest that we keep ap_proxy_lb_workers
in proxy_util.c (as it currently is), since even
though its not part of the API, other proxy module
make have a need for it (and again,
Ashwani Kumar Sharma wrote:
The httpd.exe of Apache web server has two processes running in windows.
When we kill the parent httpd.exe the child httpd.exe is still running and
listening to the web request. I don't want this.
Since you forcibly terminate the server process(es) your instance
Jim Jagielski wrote:
What with this and the Win32/apr issues, seems to me that
we should consider a 2.2.7 out soonish :)
I was about to suggest the same :)
With Win32/APR there isn't a fix. Not yet at least, Tom Donovan and I are
going back and forth with ideas that break the fewest binaries
Eric Covener wrote:
For debugging a windows build, is there a simple change to the Apache
build/workspace that will print all the cl.exe/link.exe invocations?
FWIW I'm using VC6 and my build is kicked off as below:
msdev apache.dsw /MAKE BuildBin Win32 Release
I see that sometimes while
There seems to be troubles in paradise. cc'ing httpd who had
recently updated mime-types.
I'm not speaking about IE7's refusal to assign quality quotients to
their Accept: alternatives, no, this is a bit trickier and it looks
like we are in the wrong.
An example document,
On 11 Sep 2007, at 23:26, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Best I can figure, this is really application/x-tar+x-gzip (or would
that be application/x-gzip+x-tar?) if we don't want to (and we don't
want to) advertise the content stream as gzip'ed (preventing automatic
inflation which would cause
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
An example document, /dist/httpd/httpd-2.2.6.tar.gz is requested and
...
Best I can figure, this is really application/x-tar+x-gzip (or would
that be application/x-gzip+x-tar?) if we don't want to (and we don't
want to) advertise the content stream as gzip'ed
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
There seems to be troubles in paradise. cc'ing httpd who had
recently updated mime-types.
Best I can figure, this is really application/x-tar+x-gzip (or would
that be application/x-gzip+x-tar?) if we don't want to (and we don't
want to) advertise the content
Nick Kew wrote:
On 11 Sep 2007, at 23:26, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Best I can figure, this is really application/x-tar+x-gzip (or would
that be application/x-gzip+x-tar?) if we don't want to (and we don't
want to) advertise the content stream as gzip'ed (preventing automatic
inflation
Nikolas Coukouma wrote:
Due to the lack of a real standard (AFAIK ...) that doesn't use content
encodings, it's hard to say what is correct.
Agreed...
If it's decided to avoid the use of Content-Encoding (is the hash and
signature problem that bad?)
Yes if mirrors can't be
Nikolas Coukouma wrote:
It should also be noted that this has been discussed here before, in
February of 2003
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/httpd-dev/200302.mbox/[EMAIL
PROTECTED]
Actually this wasn't; that subject was filename munging and content-type
inference. This is
Jochen Wiedmann wrote:
On 9/12/07, William A. Rowe, Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
But within IE7, the request is truncated at 4864kb instead of the
expected 6mb. My best guess is that IE believes it can grok the file
as it's advertised content type.
Is it possible that the browser invokes
Looking at the scope of all these static calls, I really believe the
patch is this simple (process-pool survives the entire httpd);
Index: ssl_engine_vars.c
===
--- ssl_engine_vars.c (revision 574494)
+++ ssl_engine_vars.c
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Looking at the scope of all these static calls, I really believe the
patch is this simple (process-pool survives the entire httpd);
Sorry - scratch that. I wasn't counting the frequency of pstrdup calls.
Just begging for optimization :)
Ruediger Pluem wrote:
Can someone with appropriate permissions please add version 2.2.6 to bugzilla
such
that bug reports can be done correctly? Thanks.
I don't have my Bugzilla login password on me right now... I'll add this
tomorrow when I get home, if no one beats me to it.
S.
Sander Temme wrote:
Ruediger Pluem wrote:
Can someone with appropriate permissions please add version 2.2.6 to
bugzilla such
that bug reports can be done correctly? Thanks.
I don't have my Bugzilla login password on me right now... I'll add this
tomorrow when I get home, if no one beats
All,
I was wondering - is there a tracking/debugging tool that allows you to see
exactly
what happens with an incoming URL? ie, output looking something like this:
http://www.mysite.com/cgi-bin/test_script.pl
Parsing url... partial url '/cgi-bin/test_script.pl'
Looking
49 matches
Mail list logo
