-Original Message-
From: André Malo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Why? Unless the file changes in 2004, the copyright
doesn't. And, in
any case, the earliest date applies, so it gets us nowhere.
It was done for LICENSE 1.0 and 1.1 all the time for some
reason. But I don't
Hi,
As said in the subject...
The attached file ApacheMonitor.exe.manifest needs to be copied in the
/support/win32/ dir.
Index: ApacheMonitor.rc
===
RCS file: /home/cvspublic/httpd-2.0/support/win32/ApacheMonitor.rc,v
retrieving
Hi,
-Original Message-
From: Jeff Trawick
Is this to correct a problem for all Windows platforms which
manifests itself on Windows XP, or just something that people
with Windows XP may wish to play with, or what?
On pre-XP it behave like before, but on XP it has visual style
Graham Leggett wrote:
Thing is it's easier for end users to not have to mess around
with third party builds if it can possibly be avoided, and
it's the needs of the end users who are the most important,
not the developers.
It was the main reason why we tried to go beyond the concepts
Graham Leggett wrote:
I don't think that it is necessary for a mod_ajp to be
included inside
the mod_proxy, although they are sharing some common concepts.
I think it's very necessary - sharing those common concepts
ultimately makes for doing things in a consistent way. It
Hi all,
There has been some serious discussion for building load balancing support
for mod_proxy.
Here is the first in series of patches that will enable this.
The patch adds lb support in scoreboard, so that statuses for each lb worker
can be calculated for each child process.
It uses optional
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
/* Scoreboard file, if there is one */
#ifndef DEFAULT_SCOREBOARD
@@ -118,6 +119,7 @@
typedef struct {
int server_limit;
int thread_limit;
+int lb_limit;
ap_scoreboard_e sb_type;
André Malo wrote:
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
This definitely breaks binary compatibility.
Moving the lb_limit to the end of the struct will not break
the binary
compatibility. Correct?
Not Correct. It *may* be the case. Depending on who allocates
the stuff.
Can you
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Moving the lb_limit to the end of the struct will not break
the binary
compatibility. Correct?
Yes, in the case of global_score, that would be safer. It
seems that the additional lb_score 's element point was better placed.
If you changed
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Although
we create the pointer-pointer logic in the children to avoid
this, it's still possible that the code would break some modules.
I can't envision a case where any of the scoreboard entries
are allocated outside of our scoreboard.c code.
OK, then.
Hi all,
Since there was some concerns regarding binary compatibility, here is the
patch that uses different approach.
1. Revert the patch with changes to scoreboard structures
2. Add an extra hook that is run during ap_reopen_scoreboard with detached
param.
We will use our own shm, opening by
Oops... gone trough different email, so reposting.
Hi,
Not a very 'critical' patch, but enables building mod_proxy on 2.0-HEAD (if
someone finds that usefull).
Since 2.1 has some nice features (will have more hopefully) here is the
patch that enables that.
Index: proxy_util.c
Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
-if ((rv = apr_socket_create(newsock, backend_addr-family,
+#if (APR_VERSION_MAJOR 0)
+if ((rv = apr_socket_create(
+#else
+if ((rv = apr_socket_create_ex( #endif
+newsock, backend_addr-family,
Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
We have a lot of proxy updates in 2.1, which are presumably getting
test-driven over time. How would one go about proposing a
wholesale
backport?
How about releasing 2.2 instead? ;-)
How about backport :)
JaeanFrederic, Henri and myself take a liberty
André Malo wrote:
OTOH hiding something just to 'boost' a new version is not fair.
I think, you've got something wrong.
Perhaps :)
As of the branch to 2.1,
we've marked 2.0 stable and more or less freezed. That has
nothing to do with being fair or not. The development just
happens in
Hi all,
We've finished the initial development of extended mod_proxy.
Since the development took place at jakata-tomcat-connectors,
the source code can be found under ajp/proxy.
Here is the list of major features added:
1. AJP13 protocol support
2. Connection pool for threaded servers
3. Added new
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
We've finished the initial development of extended mod_proxy.
Since the development took place at jakata-tomcat-connectors,
the source code can be found under ajp/proxy.
I'm entirely +1 today for bringing it back into modules/proxy/ (it's
a c-t-r branch.) How you did
Graham Leggett wrote:
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
I'm actually very excited that we can offer in the 2.2 release - this
really rocks. What you accomplished is very cool!
I'm entirely +1 today for bringing it back into modules/proxy/ (it's a
c-t-r branch.) How you did it makes this a
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Never cross my mind that we'll need all those try-error-fix
commits back on the httpd cvs tree.
We actually like those - the next individual to say wow - this fix is easy!
can go back over history and say grumf - they tried that in the first place
:)
Question...
Hi,
Small patch that enables building against zlib-1.2.1
instead of ancient 1.1.4 version.
Index: mod_deflate.dsp
===
RCS file: /home/cvspublic/httpd-2.0/modules/filters/mod_deflate.dsp,v
retrieving revision 1.10
diff -u -r1.10
Hi all,
To be able to use the new proxy balancer to it's full
potential we need some sort of dynamic configuration.
The typical scenarios are:
a) Mark a node(s) as 'disabled' for maintenance.
b) Add an extra node(s) for additional load.
c) Change the load factors.
At first I was thinking to add
Bill Stoddard wrote:
Mladen Turk wrote:
Hi,
Small patch that enables building against zlib-1.2.1
instead of ancient 1.1.4 version.
Are there any compelling reasons to move from 1.1.4 to 1.2.1? Just
curious and no time to investigate for myself right at the moment.
As stated on the official
Hi,
I've changed the mpm_winnt to support multiple child processes.
The main reason was to have the same behavior like on worker mpm.
Since I don't have multiprocessor box, it would be nice if someone
could test if there is any performance gain over the existing
implementation (there is none on
Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
Modified:modules/proxy proxy_http.c
Log:
Use ap_str_tolower for lowercasing the scheme.
That was the original intention (not apr_tolower).
Can you please not mix formatting changes with code changes? Those
spurious changes make it a lot tougher to review.
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Bad news for me and many others since without AJP support included in
2.0.x, users will still require to have mod_jk to link there HTTPD to
Tomcats.
Could we hope the dev team to relax the situation for mod_proxy/ajp in
future 2.0.x release
Admins understand why n.x -
Jeff Trawick wrote:
[Fri Sep 03 12:05:59 2004] [error] [client 127.0.0.1] File does not
exist: proxy:http://127.0.0.1:10101/cgi-bin/printenv
If nobody can/has reproduced the problem, I'll dig into it this weekend.
I had time dig into it enough to get the feeling that it is something
that the
Jeff Trawick wrote:
What is the config that you are using. Does you requests get
passed with previous version of proxy. If they do, please post the
config so we can find why is it breaking.
This is a very basic proxy config:
proxyrequests on
proxyvia on
allowconnect 8081 80 8080
OK.
From that
Graham Leggett wrote:
proxyrequests on
proxyvia on
allowconnect 8081 80 8080
OK.
From that config what would be remotes that
we could connect to?
Dynamically obtained from Via header or...?
Seems to me that the balancer is totally unusable in
such a configuration.
Keep in mind proxyrequests on
Jeff Trawick wrote:
Can you explain some real world usage of such configuration.
Configure your web browser to use Apache as an HTTP proxy.
This is a forward proxy? Are you speaking about that?
If do, then the current implementation might be bogus,
cause frankly speaking didn't test that a lot,
Graham Leggett wrote:
Mladen Turk wrote:
This is a forward proxy? Are you speaking about that?
If do, then the current implementation might be bogus,
cause frankly speaking didn't test that a lot, but was
planning to do so.
Or I've missed the subject again :).
Proxyrequest on turns httpd
Jeff Trawick wrote:
On Fri, 3 Sep 2004 12:30:34 -0400, Jeff Trawick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
192.168.1.11 - - [03/Sep/2004:12:05:59 -0400] GET
http://127.0.0.1:10101/cgi-bin/printenv HTTP/1.0 404 236
error log has:
[Fri Sep 03 12:05:59 2004] [error] [client 127.0.0.1] File does not
exist:
Jeff Trawick wrote:
Just committed the needed changes to allow forward proxies.
I saw... definitely gets farther now... This shows how far it gets
when I configure mozilla to use Apache as HTTP proxy:
[Thu Sep 09 06:53:17 2004] [crit] [Thu Sep 09 06:53:17 2004] file
http_protocol.c, line 981,
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
You introduce a race between multiple listening threads attempting
to initialize the scoreboard together. post_config or child_init
should solve the problem, no?
Yes, I see that (now that you've mentioned :)).
I'll use the child_init to initialize all balancers.
Joe Orton wrote:
On Thu, Sep 09, 2004 at 07:56:31PM -, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
mturk 2004/09/09 12:56:31
Modified:modules/proxy proxy_ajp.c
Log:
Add function protos so that -Wmissing-declarations doesn't complain.
Adding separate declarations within a .c file (rater than a
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
jorton 2004/09/14 10:29:36
Modified:modules/proxy proxy_ajp.c
Log:
* modules/proxy/proxy_ajp.c (proxy_ajp_handler, proxy_ajp_canon): Drop
ap_ prefix, declarations and make static.
Could you then do the same for proxy_http?
Both ap_proxy_http_canon and
NormW wrote:
Greetings All,
Just looking at a CVS build of 2.1, and on accessing the BalancerManager
page, the FailoverAttempts (on a NetWare platform) show as -2119156632.
Strange... did you rebuild mod_proxy too?
Regards,
MT.
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Hi,
Is there any reason why apr, apr-util, httpd mailing lists have
Reply-To header set to the sender and not to the list itself.
I think almost all other lists has the 'Replay-To' header set
to the list itself. I mean, I'm receiving the messages from the
list and not from the particular poster,
Greg Marr wrote:
Is there any reason why apr, apr-util, httpd mailing lists have
Reply-To header set to the sender and not to the list itself.
Search for
reply-to considered harmful
on Google and you'll find more information than you ever wanted to read
about both sides of the issue.
If you
Joe Orton wrote:
The SSL proxy tests in the test suite have broken again from one of
these changes. I get core dumps like below. Any ideas?
#0 0x0807fc07 in ap_proxy_acquire_connection (
proxy_function=0x8477540 \buG\b(pE\b\220\211;\b, conn=0x84575f6,
worker=0x844c520, s=0x83b8990)
Joe Orton wrote:
On Sun, Sep 26, 2004 at 06:58:36AM -, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
mturk 2004/09/25 23:58:36
Modified:modules/proxy proxy_balancer.c
Log:
Use the Christian von Roques's idea that makes the election mechanism
much simpler. This also removes the need to count the
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
mturk 2004/09/28 09:35:30
Modified:modules/proxy mod_proxy.c proxy_balancer.c proxy_util.c
mod_proxy.h
Revision ChangesPath
1.158 +1843 -1846httpd-2.0/modules/proxy/proxy_util.c
1.138 +614 -605
Jim Jagielski wrote:
There is a lot of confusion where the users think that
simply adding the stickysession param to the http worker
attribute *adds* the required sticky session info (cookie).
I'm looking into adding functionality that actually
does that and therefore avoiding this large and
Jim Jagielski wrote:
I'm not sure about this... is the patch complete or are
other things being added at some point? For example:
It was mostly copy/paste from mod_jk where it was
not reported for a failure on any platform.
Just make some code cleanup.
Also, does this mean that the
Ruediger Pluem wrote:
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revrev=451582
Log:
Move new struct member to the end of the struct,
so we can keep the compatibility.
Sorry for nitpicking, but I am still missing the minor bump.
There was no 2.3 releases, so no need for version bump.
Regards,
Paul Querna wrote:
Mladen Turk wrote:
Ruediger Pluem wrote:
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revrev=451582
Log:
Move new struct member to the end of the struct,
so we can keep the compatibility.
Sorry for nitpicking, but I am still missing the minor bump.
There was no 2.3 releases
Paul Querna wrote:
Mladen Turk wrote:
But the trunk is usually build as is with all custom modules.
What's the point of it if we need to preserve backward compatibility.
(For what version, SVN head from DD/MM/ or what).
When the first version gets tagged from trunk, then we can have a MMN
Mathias Herberts wrote:
Oops I forgot one thing the 'ajp.patch' does. It introduces a new
parameter 'stickycasesession' which is just like 'stickysession' but
is case insensitive. This is needed as the servlet spec says the
session cookie must be named JSESSIONID but the URL rewriting scheme
hv @ Fashion Content wrote:
I have a setup that works when I proxy to the first AJP connector, but not
when I try the second one (Get a forbidden message). If I change to http
proxying it works just fine.
Has anyone experienced this?
Nope. It works just fine for multiple hosts on the same
André Malo wrote:
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: mturk
Date: Sun Oct 8 02:58:21 2006
New Revision: 454114
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revrev=454114
Log:
Add compat module by default.
More interesting would have been, why.
What's the use of this?
Because default
André Malo wrote:
* Mladen Turk wrote:
André Malo wrote:
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: mturk
Date: Sun Oct 8 02:58:21 2006
New Revision: 454114
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revrev=454114
Log:
Add compat module by default.
More interesting would have been, why.
What's
Ruediger Pluem wrote:
But yes, in theory their remains a race here if the proxy reuses the connection
faster then the backend needs time to close the socket after sending the
response.
Does the problem exists with the current trunk as well?
The way how trunk detects the closed backend has
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
why not s#/wd:4996#/D _CRT_SECURE_NO_DEPRECATE#
/wd with colon like (/wd:4966) gives:
Command line error D8021 : invalid numeric argument '/wd:4996' cl
when converted to VS2005.
BTW according to the MSDN the proper format is /wd not /wd:
Also the
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Mladen Turk wrote:
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
why not s#/wd:4996#/D _CRT_SECURE_NO_DEPRECATE#
/wd with colon like (/wd:4966) gives:
Command line error D8021 : invalid numeric argument '/wd:4996'cl
when converted to VS2005.
BTW according to the MSDN the proper
Ruediger Pluem wrote:
I guess we should create a directive like DefineWorker (I do not really care
about
the exact name), that enables the administrator to define / create a worker.
Then you can easily just use
Proxy ajp://localhost:8009
ProxySet ...
/Proxy
It will define a 'known'
Ruediger Pluem wrote:
Then you can easily just use
Proxy ajp://localhost:8009
ProxySet ...
/Proxy
It will define a 'known' worker.
There is no need for an additional directive.
Yes, this idea came also up to me after sending the mail.
It seems to be an acceptable solution for this
Benjamin Cuthbert wrote:
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36495
Does anyone know if this bug was fixed ?
It is in the trunk, where there is alternative socket
is_connected detection.
Can you check the trunk, or at least copy the new
is_socket_connected from tunk's
Benjamin Cuthbert wrote:
Can you show me where this trunk is ? URL ?
svn export http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/httpd/httpd/trunk httpd-head
Anyhow:
http://httpd.apache.org/dev/
Regards,
Mladen.
Jim Jagielski wrote:
Looking over CHANGES and STATUS, I think we should
start thinking about a 2.2.4 release. Comments?
I would like to propose the backport of proxy alternate
is_socket_connected. This is IMHO very crucial
for AJP to work. Without that the loadbalancer is
unusable for most
Jim Jagielski wrote:
I know that Bill is looking at a release of APR and
that alternate method would, I think, be better
implemented in APR than directly in httpd...
Sure it can be done, but in that case it would require at
least a minor version bump.
I have a proto that uses
Jim Jagielski wrote:
Mladen Turk wrote:
Anyhow, mod_jk works on all the platforms with the
exact code like a charm ;)
With my non-devil's-advocate hat on, the code itself is
pretty basic Steven's anyway...
It might be, not sure, but as Ferengi Rule 31 states:
Never make fun of a Ferengi's
Jim Jagielski wrote:
I know that Bill is looking at a release of APR and
that alternate method would, I think, be better
implemented in APR than directly in httpd...
Eww, no thanks. AFAIK the same results can be achieved using existing
APR interfaces: a non-blocking apr_socket_recv()
Paul Querna wrote:
To my surprise several people just expressed the opinion that LUA should
be part of the apache core in the long run. Could you explain for what
purposes you want to do this?
Because its fun.
Do you know where to find LUA developer resources?
One thing I could never find
Issac Goldstand wrote:
I don't think that the problem is mod_perl, as much as the winnt MPM in
Apache2. The bottom line is that if anything goes wrong, you need the
singleton child process to recycle itself, and very often in the case of
mod_perl that can take a long time.
There is
Hi,
There are some pending mod_proxy patches for 2.2.x.
I would like to push some testing on the
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revrevision=468941
(explicit flushing from recent Tomcats)
and
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revrevision=425454
(cping/cpong support)
The patches are part of
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
The default service name is Apache2, both in the 2.0 and 2.2 WinNT MPMs.
One of three things can happen here... please express your preference
(if you have one)
[ ] Change the MPM code to use Apache2.2 by default (and Apache2.4 in trunk)
[X] Change the Installer
Jean-Frederic wrote:
-if (status != APR_SUCCESS) {
+if (! isok) {
/* We had a failure: Close connection to backend */
conn-close++;
This is what concerns me (not your code but the old conn-close++.
Hope It wasn't me ;)
Anyhow, AJP should keep the connection to
Rainer Jung wrote:
Caution: this line exactly has been added as a patch for BZ 40310. I
didn't follow this too closely, but it looked like a serious issue for
the user.
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40310
The user comments, that the fix might be relevant for mod_jk too,
Mathias Herberts wrote:
The 'forceclose' patch will ensure that this situation will never
happen as the Cmax connections will not be kept idle. It will have a
slight performance penalty but that's better than a total inability to
serve requests (which should only happen when T0 is really
Jim Jagielski wrote:
On Mar 16, 2007, at 8:52 AM, Mathias Herberts wrote:
I agree that reusing the backend connections can be a good thing, but
there are times when this is just not a very good idea.
I agree that there are times when having a single-shot
connection is better than having a
Rainer Jung wrote:
Mladen Turk wrote:
Jean-Frederic wrote:
-if (status != APR_SUCCESS) {
+if (! isok) {
/* We had a failure: Close connection to backend */
conn-close++;
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40310
The user comments, that the fix
Guenter Knauf wrote:
Hi,
Should we add a cert-creation .sh and .vbs script to support/ for this
purpose (on any platform)? Sounds like a great idea to me!
+1 from me.
If you find my vbs useful then I will contribute it.
I've spent a good time to find at least something working;
Drop an eye
Joe Orton wrote:
Drop an eye on:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/tomcat/connectors/trunk/jni/examples/mkcerts?view=markup
- auto-generating dummy certs which claim to be issued by or to the ASF
doesn't seem like a good idea at all
It is an example, so anyone is entitled to change it for
its
Georg von Zezschwitz wrote:
As I (with Rüdigers help :-) ) found out, there is already a bug report
to my problem:
#41897 describes the problem that the case-sensitivity of the
stickysession-Parameter
does not comply to the Java Servlet Spec (Cookie: JSESSIONID, url
based session
Plüm wrote:
IMHO adding config parameters is no blocker for a backport.
I was under different perception.
It is probably more easy to add balancer-stickyurl =
jsessionid when
balancer-sticky is JSESSIONID and NULL otherwise.
Or in get_path_param() test for jsessionid when
Jean-Frederic wrote:
We could do that then by using existing directive and decide
during configure time.
For example:
stickysession=JSESSIONID [C] stickysession=;jsessionid [P]
Does that mean that stickysession=JSESSIONID will work as it does now?
Yes.
I don't think we need Case
Plüm wrote:
1. You want to change sticky in struct proxy_balancer from
const char *sticky
to something like
const char *sticky[MAX_ENTRIES]
Yes, although MAX_ENTRIES would be 3 for now
(cookie, path and env)
Why is FOO stored in balancer-sticky-[2]? Is it because
Plüm wrote:
Yes, although MAX_ENTRIES would be 3 for now
(cookie, path and env)
But this means that we break the ABI here. If struct proxy_balancer is part
of a public API (I am not sure about this) this would require a major bump
and would prevent backporting.
The other solution is to
Plüm wrote:
Plus does it make sense to split the sticky string everytime we search
for a route? From my performance feeling this split should be done during
configuration time.
We can use the NUL separated double NUL terminated string.
Then a part is start + strlen(start)
Regards,
Mladen.
Jim Jagielski wrote:
This is only fixed in trunk so far. See
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41056
and
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revrevision=480135
Hmmm. Looks like a backport candidate... I'll likely
do some testing and propose if it works :)
I have another
Plüm wrote:
+1 I will try to check it once you have proposed it and give it
a quick vote.
I have another one that fixes this issues for non-chunked content.
I haven't tried yet, but IMHO it should already work for non-chunked
content. Is this not the case?
Not according to my tests. The
Jim Jagielski wrote:
Not according to my tests. The simple server push still
buffers the data.
Hmmm a followup commit has:
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revrev=504559
so that may be exactly the case...
Huh, looks like it works now. Although I didn't test is with
Ruediger Pluem wrote:
On 04/06/2007 01:13 PM, Georg von Zezschwitz wrote:
Jim Jagielski wrote:
attached is the patch for trunk with documentation Co.
Could anybody review it commit?
Many thanks for sending the patch and my apologies that reviewing it took
that long. Please find my
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
yacsha wrote:
what?
I think Mario's post below is quite clear. I am wondering, however,
*where* he sees the error message he cites. A log? A popup command
window? An ok box? Is there additional details (a window caption or
other details?) Does it continue to
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Mladen Turk wrote:
Just tracking the Vista problems down.
One problem is the installer. Every awk config rewrite fails
so the installation ends up without config files.
Didn't try with Administrator account directly, but with the
member of the administrators group
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Can't we do
+else if (osvi.dwMajorVersion = 6) {
+*dwVersion = OS_VERSION_VISTA;
for now (or simply 'else') so that this isn't instantly broken by the
next version, irrespective of any changes required?
Sure we can. Since we are only
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Can't we do
+else if (osvi.dwMajorVersion = 6) {
+*dwVersion = OS_VERSION_VISTA;
for now (or simply 'else') so that this isn't instantly broken by the
next version, irrespective of any changes required?
Nevertheless, completely unrelated ...
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
You want to commit or should I?
Knock yourself out :)
Cheers,
Mladen.
Jim Jagielski wrote:
1. ProxyPass /foo/* balancer://bar
should silently rewrite itself to
ProxyPass /foo/ balancer://bar
In other words, we already assume a prefix
glob. But should we? In other words,
there is no difference between /foo/ and /foo/*.
If you
jean-frederic clere wrote:
Hi,
I would like to fix a problem in mod_proxy_balancer when the
configuration is something like:
+++
Location /myapp
ProxyPass balancer://mycluster/myapp
stickysession=JESSSIONID|jsessionid nofailover=On
/Location
Location /titi
ProxyPass
jean-frederic clere wrote:
Mladen Turk wrote:
jean-frederic clere wrote:
Hi,
I would like to fix a problem in mod_proxy_balancer when the
configuration is something like:
+++
Location /myapp
ProxyPass balancer://mycluster/myapp
stickysession=JESSSIONID|jsessionid nofailover
jean-frederic clere wrote:
Hmm, nofailover=On is used for non-matched routes.
The failover stuff is between the members of a balancer not between
balancers.
Not true.
? In find_route_worker(proxy_balancer *balancer...)
nofailover == sticky_force
snip
runtime =
Johnny Kewl wrote:
Mladen... stupid question, but what is this stuff in the code
@@ -470,15 +470,32 @@
http://www.network-theory.co.uk/articles/patchintro.html
It doesn't exactly explain the format of the patch file, but
it can be helpful :)
Regards,
Mladen
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: mturk
Date: Tue Jul 17 02:23:30 2007
New Revision: 556860
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revrev=556860
Log:
Comment the backport concerns for ApacheMonitor
--- httpd/httpd/branches/2.2.x/STATUS (original)
+++
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: mturk
Date: Wed Jul 18 01:02:21 2007
New Revision: 557188
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revrev=557188
Log:
Simplify OS detection. We are only interested in NT
and WIN2K+ (so we can use services.msc)
Can we assume that
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: jim
/* stuff which is lb specific */
-typedef struct proxy_worker_stat lb_score;
+typedef struct lb_score lb_score;
+struct lb_score {
+/* TODO: sync this with proxy_worker_stat */
+unsigned char data[256];
+};
The original was 1024, and now you
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
I had refactored your patch on trunk so that we no longer name the
silly function wait_for_many_objects (since it obviously didn't do
that properly, at least not with any consideration of fairness or
parallel signals). Roy's concerns should be addressed.
+1 It
Hi,
Seems that there are lots of commits made recently to
that branch (IIUC Apache 3)
However I simply cannot recall there was any discussion
except the one in the
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/httpd/sandbox/amsterdam/ROADMAP
So, a simple question, what are we doing?
What are the goals and
Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
On Nov 15, 2007 12:10 PM, Mladen Turk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If the guys committing those stuff can share some light
to the rest of us, perhaps we could participate as well.
The path we're going down (for now) is making serf the core
input/output filtering mechanism
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Added:
httpd/site/trunk/xdocs/images/rbowen.jpg (with props)
Very nice photo!
I hope others will follow ;)
Cheers,
Mladen
Jim Jagielski wrote:
On Nov 28, 2007, at 3:39 AM, jean-frederic clere wrote:
One of the question is should we go on using scoreboard to store the
balancers and workers information or should we already add a layer to a
provider that will provide all the features we need to handle the
balancers
1 - 100 of 412 matches
Mail list logo
