On 18.02.2008, at 20:03, Roy T. Fielding wrote:
On Feb 9, 2008, at 4:21 PM, Issac Goldstand wrote:
Any volunteers to import mod_dns so I can eventually start hacking
at it
again (topic came up at work recently and I have a couple of feature
ideas that I'd like to work on, but really don't
On 18.02.2008, at 21:09, Dirk-Willem van Gulik wrote:
On Feb 18, 2008, at 7:57 PM, Roy T. Fielding wrote:
On Feb 18, 2008, at 4:32 AM, Issac Goldstand wrote:
Nick Kew wrote:
On 18 Feb 2008, at 08:29, Issac Goldstand wrote:
I think we also adopted mod_dns at Apachecon,
That'll be *cough*
On 13.02.2008, at 16:27, Jim Jagielski wrote:
I added something similar to mod_jk quite awhile ago, and
I'm trying to get mod_jk and mod_proxy closer to parity,
esp for those using AJP. So with that in mind, comments
on the below??
Index: docs/manual/mod/mod_proxy.xml
On 24.01.2008, at 00:53, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
security/vulnerabilities-oval.xml
I'm ending up with deltas such as these...
-httpd_state xmlns=http://oval.mitre.org/XMLSchema/oval-
definitions-5#apache id=oval:org.apache.httpd:ste:131
version=1 comment=the version of httpd is 1.3.1
On 10.02.2008, at 14:16, Dirk-Willem van Gulik wrote:
On Feb 10, 2008, at 1:21 AM, Issac Goldstand wrote:
Any volunteers to import mod_dns so I can eventually start hacking
at it
again (topic came up at work recently and I have a couple of feature
ideas that I'd like to work on, but really
On 08.02.2008, at 23:57, Ruediger Pluem wrote:
On 02/08/2008 07:58 PM, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Jim Jagielski wrote:
On Feb 8, 2008, at 12:01 PM, Nick Kew wrote:
On Fri, 8 Feb 2008 16:07:40 +0100
Dirk-Willem van Gulik [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Given that mod_cache is now quite mature -
On 08.01.2008, at 17:52, Sander Temme wrote:
On Jan 8, 2008, at 5:37 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Not acked, maybe already forwarded.
What the are we supposed to do with an e-mail written:
Date: April 17, 2004 10:21:24 PM PDT
??!
Chris has probably graduated a long time ago and
On 02.10.2007, at 20:52, Paul Querna wrote:
So, the first step is to cut out any illusion that new features are
going into 1.3, with a statement like this:
Starting in January 2008, only critical security issues will be
fixed in
Apache HTTP Server versions 1.3.x or 2.0.x.
I honestly
On 01.10.2007, at 12:22, Erik Abele wrote:
On 01.10.2007, at 09:58, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
...
I like the idea of adding a date to each news item, be it on
httpd.a.o,
or our www.apache.org. +1.
+1, see attached patch which adds dates to the index and download
pages (see changes
On 01.10.2007, at 09:58, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Boyle Owen wrote:
Might it be an idea for 2.2.7?
You can also get it from here for now:
http://projects.apache.org/projects/http_server.html
or as a feed:
http://projects.apache.org/feeds/rss/http_server.xml
I like the idea of adding a
On 27.09.2007, at 10:05, François wrote:
2007/9/27, William A. Rowe, Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
[...] Here at [EMAIL PROTECTED] we are trying to create a better server,
and having
fun in the process. As long as we don't splinter the effort of
improving
httpd server or make more work for the
On 27.09.2007, at 17:04, François wrote:
2007/9/27, Erik Abele [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Again, Steffens contributions would be very welcomed *here* if this
whole AL thing were just not that misleading - hey, with some effort
he could e.g. help out constructively by building these binaries
On 28.09.2007, at 01:28, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Erik Abele wrote:
Sure, we all have to pay our bills but you're overlooking a
difference:
Nick just replied to an inquiry offering his (and others
services); he
doesn't advertise any revenue-generating site after every release
etc
On 11.09.2007, at 19:26, Jim Jagielski wrote:
On Sep 11, 2007, at 1:11 PM, Jeff McAdams wrote:
For the benefit of the list...if there are other developers, in
addition
to Nick, that might be interested in taking a look at this project
and
tackling it, let me know and we can certainly
On 13.09.2007, at 18:27, Jim Jagielski wrote:
On Sep 13, 2007, at 12:11 PM, Erik Abele wrote:
On 11.09.2007, at 19:26, Jim Jagielski wrote:
...
I actually work for a company which is currently working
out the logistics of open sourcing and donating our
SNMP module. It would serve as a nice
On 04.09.2007, at 23:29, Jim Jagielski wrote:
Available for your testing pleasure, 3, count 'em, 3
Apache HTTP Server release candidate tarballs, located,
as expected at:
http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/
This vote will run through Sept 6, 2007 and close
Sept 7, unless otherwise noted...
On 02.09.2007, at 17:06, Tim Bray wrote:
On Sep 2, 2007, at 5:24 AM, Graham Leggett wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is nbsp; valid in XML?
The answer is complicated. One approach is to use #xA0; which is
kinda ugly but works in lots more places. -T
Yep, quite complicated - it has to
On 30.08.2007, at 15:02, Jim Jagielski wrote:
Yes, the CHANGES file will be updated to reflect any
and all security issues for that release...
And can someone please also update the NOTICE file to carry the new
copyright date? We are near to the end of 2007 and the file still
says 2006;
On 02.07.2007, at 22:48, Guenter Knauf wrote:
probably it helps a little bit to reduce these 888 bugs if we can
easier read...
http://www.gknw.net/apbugs/
http://www.gknw.net/apbugs/?version=13
Or see
http://people.apache.org/~erikabele/httpd/bugstats/
for some more motivation :-)
On 03.07.2007, at 01:44, Guenter Knauf wrote:
Hi Erik,
http://people.apache.org/~erikabele/httpd/bugstats/
looks very great; but seems that only the 1.3.x stats are uptodate
- the 2.x stats unfortunately stop at 2005/11/27 ...
Ooops, right, something seems to be broken, will have a look.
On 01.09.2006, at 21:25, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Project Committee Members...
Adopt [EMAIL PROTECTED], seeded from apache-
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
current subscribers, for module authors to use for peer developer
support?
(API 'users', essentially.)
[X] +1
[ ] +/-0
[ ] -1
With a
[CC'ing docs to also let them know that there's something to
maintain ;-)]
On 23.01.2006, at 10:43, David Reid wrote:
I've committed a DOAP file into the trunk repo. This file is
referenced
by http://projects.apache.org and so we should be keeping it up to
date.
That site also has
On 23.01.2006, at 23:13, David Reid wrote:
Erik Abele wrote:
Since this is not trunk-specific and doesn't really belong to the
source and/or release of a specific version, I'd prefer to keep this
file somewhere in [1] instead of [2]... that may sound a bit
picky but
it's a bit cleaner IMHO
On 20.12.2005, at 23:45, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Maxime Petazzoni wrote:
I was going to do that when I was told on #httpd-dev that it was
easier to drop it in my people.apache.org web space :
16:45:08 colmmacc | well, that gets mirrored, I'd use
people.apache.org/~whatever/
16:45:17
FYI: I just unsubscribed this address from [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cheers,
Erik
Am 04.05.2005 um 10:30 schrieb [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi,
Due to the amount of e-mails we get per day we have setup this auto
responder for your convenience.
This is not a monitored e-mail address
To unsubscribe
On 31.03.2005, at 18:54, Roy T. Fielding wrote:
IMO, it should be off by default on all httpd versions, just
as the config should default to no access. Personally, I would
prefer that all of the defaults be set internal to the server
such that a running httpd with an empty status file would only
On 29.03.2005, at 23:42, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
'Apache' was our program. It became our project. It's become
our entire organization.
In 2.2, I -will- be changing the default location for the Win32
installer from %programsdir%\Apache Group\Apache2\ over to
%programsdir%\Apache Software
On 01.03.2005, at 15:52, Sean Mehan wrote:
Just a pointer to something that is gaining a bit of ground in various
circles:
http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/download.php/11511/sstc-saml-
tech-overview-2.0-draft-03.pdf
found at
On 01.03.2005, at 15:18, Graham Leggett wrote:
Paul A Houle said:
I think of all the features that web site authors and developers
need that still don't exist in mainstream web servers; part of this
is in the area of content management and another major are is
authentication -- pretty much
William A. Rowe, Jr. said:
For a stable branch though - more often such changes should just
be -vetoed- instead of worked-around. Packaging changes would
seem to signal breakage, not a reason for a workaround.
-1 not CTR. Lazy consensus. Propose, give 3 - 5 days (what
ever your schedule best
On 23.01.2005, at 18:43, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
On Mon, Jan 10, 2005 at 01:11:34AM -0600, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Please describe what this actually does?
Are we back to libproxy.la, libssl.la after this change?
For static modules, yes. This was modified in r102381 by Joe:
---
Correct use
On 25.01.2005, at 15:21, Joe Orton wrote:
On Tue, Jan 25, 2005 at 02:09:06PM +0100, Erik Abele wrote:
Exactly, this just keeps --with-module consistent with the rest of the
build system, in respect to the changes introduced by Joe. (Sorry,
Bill, I somehow missed your original mail...)
Actually
On 19.10.2004, at 04:03, Bennett, Tony - CNF wrote:
I have tried adding two different home-grown modules
to be statically linked when attempting to configure httpd 2.0.52 on
AIX 5.1.
My configure command:
...
It only builds the module specified in the last --with-module
directive.
Is this a
On 24.11.2004, at 18:28, André Malo wrote:
* Yoshiki Hayashi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
After conversion is done, sending out instruction of how to
update existing checkout would be nice. I believe you can
just svn switch to the new location but I'm not sure.
yep. just `svn switch new-url
Did you
Until now message moderation was turned off - I've actived it now so
this shouldn't happen again. Not sure why it wasn't actived
initially... let me know if something doesn't work as expected...
The current moderators are:
wrowe at rowe-clan.net
sterling.hughes at gmail.com
ianh at apache.org
On 06.10.2004, at 18:07, Cliff Woolley wrote:
On Wed, 6 Oct 2004, [ISO-8859-15] André Malo wrote:
- there are 1000 people with 1000 other opinions.
For that reason, I'm ++1 for taking this minimalistic variant.
Otherwise we
get never a consensus about this darn dummy page.
That's an exceedingly
I'm building some simple (but nice) statistics based on the
weekly bug reports mailed out to the dev- and bug-list:
http://www.apache.org/~erikabele/httpd/bugstats/
The stats are updated every sunday just after the reports
are mailed out. The script which produces the PNGs is also
available at the
On 13.03.2004, at 14:04, Sander Striker wrote:
Hi,
I hereby would like to propose that we move the HTTP Server project
codebase to the Subversion repository at:
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/.
+1.
I've proposed the same on the [EMAIL PROTECTED] list with respect to the APR
project. It
On 26.01.2004, at 18:32, Aryeh Katz wrote:
http://apache.get-software.com/httpd/binaries/win32/README.html
doesn't have the correct version numbers.
Fixed (also in HEADER.html).
As an aside, would it make more sense to use SSI, and get the version
number from the SERVER_SOFTWARE environment
On 16.01.2004, at 10:30, Joe Orton wrote:
On Fri, Jan 16, 2004 at 12:45:01AM +0100, Erik Abele wrote:
Is it really enough to change the component to re-assign a bug to
another project? Shouldn't the 'Assigned To:' field be filled with the
appropriate mailing list address?
Yeah, you have
On 15.01.2004, at 09:54, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26149
Apache 2.0.48 won't load Tomcat 4.1.29 in-process via JK2
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-01-15 08:54
---
Changing to tomcat
Is it really enough to change the
On 13.01.2004, at 22:08, Ivan Ristic wrote:
Checked on RH, Suse and Cygwin, all running the GNU version
of xargs. On which platforms does it work?
Works for me on FreeBSD and OS X and would work with -i on RH8.0's GNU
version of xargs.
Cheers,
Erik
On 06.01.2004, at 11:40, André Malo wrote:
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Changes with Apache 2.0.49
+ *) Add Polish translation of error messages. PR 25101.
+ [Tomasz Kepczynski tomek jot23.org]
+
iirc these made it never into the change log.
The Swedish and the Polish ones did,
On 02.01.2004, at 14:34, Sander Striker wrote:
On Fri, 2004-01-02 at 13:32, Ben Laurie wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
nd 2004/01/01 05:26:26
Log:
update license to 2004.
Why? Unless the file changes in 2004, the copyright doesn't. And, in
any
case, the earliest date applies, so it
On 12.11.2003, at 18:15, Jim Jagielski wrote:
It's been brought to my attention that UseCanonicalName in
1.3 is semi-broken, not completely honoring the port value
when UseCanonicalName Off (see ap_get_server_port()).
Heartburn if I fix this?
dunno if you are already aware of this report:
On 13.11.2003, at 01:29, Aaron Bannert wrote:
On Mon, Nov 10, 2003 at 05:14:35PM -0800, Stas Bekman wrote:
==
1) Bugs
searching for NEW and REOPENED bugs in httpd-2.0 returns: 420 entries
On 13.11.2003, at 02:10, Aaron Bannert wrote:
On Thu, Nov 13, 2003 at 02:04:31AM +0100, Erik Abele wrote:
I'd be very in favour of exploring other forms of bug-tracking. For
example
we'll have a full replication of BugZilla in Jira (/me hides) in the
near future
here on ASF hardware (see http
I'm able to reproduce the described symptoms every time
I check out the apache-1.3 repo. I've looked into it now but
couldn't find any problems so far.
It'd be great if one of the CVS gurus (infrastructure is cc'ed)
could have a quick look at this.
Further info:
a fresh checkout of httpd-docs-1.3
On 26/10/2003, at 02:46, Jim Jagielski wrote:
If you've rec'd 2 copies of this (the 1st on Friday), please ignore.
The 1.3.29 tarballs are available for testing at:
http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist
Feedback desired and welcomed.
Looks good for me on OS X and RH Linux 9.0.
+1 on both
On 26/10/2003, at 03:26, Sander Striker wrote:
The tarballs for 2.0.48 are ready for testing. You can find
them at:
http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/
Looks good for me on OS X and RH Linux 9.0.
+1 on both (2.0.48 1.3.29) tarballs.
Cheers,
Erik
On 12/10/2003, at 09:33, John Millaway wrote:
Hi,
In httpd-2.0.47, command_rec entries are being called twice, via
ap_process_config_tree. The first call occurs at main.c:581, and the
second
call occurs at main.c:638. The result is that the callbacks in a
module's
command_rec are called
On 19/09/2003, at 08:45, André Malo wrote:
Roy T. Fielding wrote:
dta href=http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc2617.txt;RFC
2617/a
- (Draft standard)/dt
+ (Standards Track)/dt
IETF standards track:
Internet Draft Proposed Standard Draft Standard Standard
2617 is a
On 06/09/2003, at 11:43, Astrid Keßler wrote:
Cliff wrote:
Yes, it would. But for a debug log it's a price I'm willing to
accept.
Just an unformed idea: allow these directives within Directory (and
Location?), but not within .htaccess files. The log file could be
opened as usual.
Hmm, yeah,
On 31/08/2003, at 09:21, Sander Striker wrote:
Indeed. Since 2.2 is already about the AAA rewrite it would be nice
to include
the final step on that subject aswell.
Thoughts? -- justin
What about: I'll do a 2.1 release at the same time as 2.0.48?
Just to prevent any misunderstandings: are we
On 25/07/2003, at 06:07, Henri Gomez wrote:
Hi to all,
Did some of you have a binary for mod_ssl 2.0.47 Windows ?
There is a 'over-complete' pre-built Apache 2.0.47 package
including mod_ssl and OpenSSL 0.9.7b for Windows:
http://www.apachefriends.org/wampp.html
But be aware that it's fairly
On 24/07/2003, at 11:45, André Malo wrote:
Looks like we get closer to the point we should develop a CAHSMAN [1].
Spare
time available somewhere? :)
just fyi: there's a discussion about a possible revamp of
modules.apache.org going on on [EMAIL PROTECTED] and
irc://#apache-modules. Under
On 25/07/2003, at 02:10, dein_metzger wrote:
hi everybody.
I am new to the list. and to JSP and JavaBeans
I would like to know how i configure an ODBC database called inicio
to work with JNDI, and how I use it in my JSP / Javabean. (I am using
tomcat 4.1 on windows xp)
Sorry, but this is the
Thanks, Justin!
Cheers,
Erik
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
jerenkrantz2003/05/31 12:29:47
Modified:modules/ssl mod_ssl.c
Log:
Revert revision 1.81 which called non-existent SSL_load_library.
No idea where this was seen, but OpenSSL 0.9.7b does not have this. This
gets mod_ssl
Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
Even if we don't drop the generated files in the repository (which I
won't really comment on, other than that Java on FreeBSD isn't very
stable - which matters because daedalus is on FreeBSD - someone may want
to try to generate the docs on daedalus itself), I think the
Hmmm,
but apps/apps.h and some example apps (rsautl.c, pkcs8.c) are using
OpenSSL_add_all_algorithms() instead of SSL_load_library() and
furthermore it seems that the complete source tree (0.9.6 0.9.7 CVS
HEAD of yesterday) lacks any reference to SSL_load_library()?!
Perhaps I'm blind but
will go and fix it :-
Original Message
Subject: Re: PR 8889: 1.3 apidoc is broken and I don't know how to fix
Date: Sat, 01 Mar 2003 17:34:48 +0100
From: Erik Abele [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
References: [EMAIL PROTECTED
André Malo wrote:
* Erik Abele wrote:
Just pinging another (the 3rd time)... perhaps now somebody can have a
look at this.
Been there, done that. Works perfect now. Thanks for the reminder ;-)
nd
Thanks, André!
cheers,
Erik
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
I see we've pushed to cvs HEAD of httpd-2.0 - and we are most broken.
Please back us down to tag APACHE_2_0_BRANCH!!!
For example, http://cvs.apache.org/viewcvs/httpd-2.0/docs/platform/
tries to returns a content-type: application/x-httpd-cgi
there isn't a
From: Günter Knauf [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi,
I was just asked where a user should send his suggestion for new features he's
missing in Apache? Should it go into BugZilla?
An issue filed in bugzilla and marked as enhancement should be fine IMHO.
cheers,
Erik
Guenter.
From: Günter Knauf [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi,
just wanted to compile 2.0.45 (need it because of 3rd-party module lower MMN)
but I dont know how to get it:
- http://cvs.apache.org/snapshots/ has only 2.1-dev, but its named 2.0
- http://cvs.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi/ also only shows 2.1-dev, but
André Malo wrote:
* André Malo wrote:
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=8889
All the links inside of the text are causing 404s (missing apidoc_ prefix
and .html suffix). Where is that stuff stored and generated? Although it's
1.3 we should keep it clean :)
hmm. It seems, I'm not
Got a ton of those lately... It's proably because
http://nagoya.apache.org/mirror/httpd/binaries/win32/
Advertises that the last stable version is 2.0.43, while in the files we
have 2.0.44...
Therefore I sent the attached patch some days ago ;-)
Can somebody please apply it to the
Greg Ames wrote:
Erik Abele wrote:
Therefore I sent the attached patch some days ago ;-)
Patch applied and that directory cvs up'd on daedalus. Thanks, Erik.
What I didn't do (and your patch didn't do either) is change the
reference in README.html to a small patch for a small problem pointing
AFAIK the corresponding data files can be found in the httpd-docs-1.3 module [1]. See the messages-?.xml files as well as the apidoc subdir. The scripts to generate the whole stuff are located in the httpd-docs subdir in the site-tools module [2].
cheers,
Erik
[1]
Greg Ames wrote:
D'oh! I must have fat fingered it somehow. Sorry.
(writes 50 times on the whiteboard: I will do cvs diff before cvs commit
I will do cvs diff before cvs commit
I will do cvs diff before cvs commit
etc)
Can somebody please apply the attached patch to the httpd-dist repo (or
alternatively give me karma); there are just some 2.0.43's instead of
2.0.44's ;-)
BTW, I just noticed that the README.html/HEADER.html files are showing up in
the file list on www.apache.org/dist/httpd/ (et al.).
I think
You might want to try the Apache Modelling Portal [http://apache.hpi.uni-potsdam.de/] and it's main doc http://apache.hpi.uni-potsdam.de/modules.php?name=Downloadsd_op=getitlid=3
Perhaps my pretty old (but recently updated) linklist might be helpful too:
Harrie Hazewinkel wrote:
HI,
On Saturday, January 25, 2003, at 10:22 PM, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
--On Saturday, January 25, 2003 9:43 PM +0100 Harrie Hazewinkel
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
3)Why for instance, could this not stay as a seperate module??
The case that can be made for folding it
Jim Jagielski wrote:
Erik Abele wrote:
Perhaps there is not much interest because it is somewhat 'hidden'?
IMHO mod_pop3 would gain more visibility and therefore perhaps a
better community when folded into httpd. Imagine windoze users:
they mostly rely on binary distributions and up to now
After building the current Apache 2.1 APR HEAD I hit a segfault by starting the server. A quick gdb session shows problems in apr_file_open at apr/file_io/unix/open.c:149
---
(gdb) run -X
Starting program: /usr/sbin/httpd -X
Von: Enrico Weigelt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Antworten an: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Datum: Tue, 17 Dec 2002 06:30:55 +0100
An: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Betreff: Re: [Review] MPM docs revision
On Tue, Dec 17, 2002 at 03:09:58AM +0100, André Malo wrote:
snip
- added new docs for beos, leader, mpmt_os2 and
Francis Daly wrote:
On Sat, Nov 02, 2002 at 11:29:29AM -0800, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
And, if you could submit a patch for the documentation, that'd be
appreciated. =)
...
The other is for httpd-docs-2.0/manual/mod/core.xml, which adds an
extra comment to the two directives. Also
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
At 07:44 PM 10/25/2002, you wrote:
[ Simply trying again; or according to Jeff: nag, nag, nag ;-) ]
If you use the body feature in type map files, the MIME-headers
currently are set dependant on what (mostly) type_checker says about the
type map file.
The attached
Joshua Slive wrote:
http://httpd.apache.org/download.html
I believe this is better than the current circumstances because it is
clearer for the users, and it better enables us to direct people to the
mirrors for the download and the main site for the signatures.
I've never particularly like
Joshua Slive wrote:
Erik Abele wrote:
+1. great idea, but I think the mirror sites should be mentioned more
than only once. Perhaps an extra paragraph like the following would help:
If you look at the actual links, you'll see I'm pretty much forcing
people to download from the mirrors. I
While browsing through the source I discovered a place in
proxy_util.c (line 612), where the output isn't XHTMLized so far.
Since all other server-generated output and the error documents are
valid XHTML, I think
we should change this too. Attached a patch for review please. Are there
any
Erik Abele wrote:
While browsing through the source I discovered a place in
proxy_util.c (line 612), where the output isn't XHTMLized so far.
Since all other server-generated output and the error documents are
valid XHTML, I think
we should change this too. Attached
Hi Joshua.
Thanks! I commited your patch with the sole change that I removed the
meta-content-type header, which is just bad news in my opinion.
I'm a little bit unsure about the meta-content-type header: the XHTML 1.0
specification (http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/) recommends to use both
83 matches
Mail list logo
