Re: Cryptic error when LWP isn't available

? -- justin I ditched $_, see if it solves the problem. -- _ Stas Bekman mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://stason.org/ MailChannels: Assured Messaging(TM) http://mailchannels.com/ The Practical mod_perl book http://modperlbook.org/ http

Re: svn commit: r330356 - in /httpd/test/trunk/perl-framework/t: apache/ modules/ security/ ssl/

LWP. -- _ Stas Bekman mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://stason.org/ MailChannels: Assured Messaging(TM) http://mailchannels.com/ The Practical mod_perl book http://modperlbook.org/ http://perl.apache.org/ http://perl.org/ http

Re: release canditates

+ start with -rc1 - add release date but where is the instruction to remove -rcX when doing the final release? -- _ Stas Bekman mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://stason.org/ MailChannels: Assured Messaging(TM) http://mailchannels.com

Re: towards a 2.07 release

Joe Schaefer wrote: Stas Bekman [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Shouldn't this be fatal? (now it continues to run and you can be sure that noone will notice that suggestion) it fails only later when you run make. From `svn log Makefile.PL`: r165547 | randyk | 2005-05-01 17:54:26 -0400

Re: new directive: ReceiveBufferSize

Stas Bekman wrote: Murray Nesbitt has submitted a request for a new feature ReceiveBufferSize: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36038 Hmm, it was already added to trunk 6 months ago, but for some reason wasn't backported to 2.0

Re: new directive: ReceiveBufferSize

André Malo wrote: * Stas Bekman wrote: Stas Bekman wrote: Murray Nesbitt has submitted a request for a new feature ReceiveBufferSize: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36038 Hmm, it was already added to trunk 6 months ago, but for some reason wasn't backported to 2.0

Re: svn commit: r280386 - /httpd/httpd/branches/2.0.x/STATUS

-2005-2700, mod_ssl SSLVerifyClient bug http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=264800view=rev test case: perl-framework/t/security/CAN-2005-2700.t sorry, fixed... -- __ Stas BekmanJAm_pH -- Just Another

Re: [PATCH] fix mp2bug output to find httpd correct

) { next unless $Apache::TestConfigData::vars-{$_}; $args-{$_} = $Apache::TestConfigData::vars-{$_}; not really, I believe. It's possible that -httpd is not passed, in which case this won't work. -- __ Stas Bekman

Re: Apache::Test v1.25 error - Can't use string (Test::Builder) as a HASH ref

. -- __ Stas BekmanJAm_pH -- Just Another mod_perl Hacker http://stason.org/ mod_perl Guide --- http://perl.apache.org mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://use.perl.org http://apacheweek.com http://modperlbook.org http://apache.org http://ticketmaster.com

Re: Apache::Test v1.25 error - Can't use string (Test::Builder) as a HASH ref

Geoffrey Young wrote: Stas Bekman wrote: Geoffrey Young wrote: Now, this looks like a bug. The T::B-reset method expects an object, Apache::Test calls it as a class method. I allow for the possibility that I've completely misunderstood everything--or even just some things. well, it's

Re: Watchdog code for Apache

://search.cpan.org/dist/Apache-Watchdog-RunAway/ which exists since 2000 and works with both Apache 1.3 and 2.x. Though with 2.0 it has the same issues, as Nick have mentioned -- __ Stas BekmanJAm_pH -- Just Another mod_perl Hacker

ap_save_brigade = apr_save_brigade?

Hi, what's the status of ap_save_brigade()? why it is not in the libapr? Thanks. -- __ Stas BekmanJAm_pH -- Just Another mod_perl Hacker http://stason.org/ mod_perl Guide --- http://perl.apache.org mailto:[EMAIL

Re: Post-2.2 Thoughts

' is half mangled with the 'core core'. and then we will have 'httpd' that can't serve http, how ironic :) may be 2.2 should rename 'httpd' to something more realistic? -- __ Stas BekmanJAm_pH -- Just Another mod_perl Hacker

Re: [PATCH] add TCP_DEFER_ACCEPT to 2.0.54

to the failing test in the mod_perl test suite which implements an SMTP-like protocol handler. Apparently httpd needs more protocol tests so this kind of features won't go in w/o being noticed. -- __ Stas BekmanJAm_pH -- Just

Re: [PATCH] add TCP_DEFER_ACCEPT to 2.0.54

Paul Querna wrote: Stas Bekman wrote: Brian Akins wrote: Torsten Foertsch wrote: Maybe it is worth to make this option settable via httpd.conf? If there is interest, I could do that. This functionality is in 2.1, so some may object to adding this feature to 2.0. I am investigating its

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Apache-Test 1.22

. -- __ Stas BekmanJAm_pH -- Just Another mod_perl Hacker http://stason.org/ mod_perl Guide --- http://perl.apache.org mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://use.perl.org http://apacheweek.com http://modperlbook.org http://apache.org http://ticketmaster.com

Re: Flushing lingering CGI processes

mod_scoreboard_send.c. Both live here: http://search.cpan.org/dist/Apache-Scoreboard/ -- __ Stas BekmanJAm_pH -- Just Another mod_perl Hacker http://stason.org/ mod_perl Guide --- http://perl.apache.org mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http

Re: svn commit: r158805 - in httpd/test/tags/APACHE_TEST_1_21: ./ Changes

/Changes - copied unchanged from r158804, perl/Apache-Test/trunk/Changes This is no longer correct. the tag should be done in a different repository, where A-T now lives. -- __ Stas BekmanJAm_pH -- Just Another

Re: Retrieving address via remote_ip

the same value as if it had a live connection from the same machine. If you want to discuss how this can be done, let's do that on the test-dev list where this discussion belongs. Thanks. -- __ Stas BekmanJAm_pH -- Just

Re: Apache-Test subdirectory has moved (again)

to be. Thanks for doing the moving work, Geoff and Justin! -- __ Stas BekmanJAm_pH -- Just Another mod_perl Hacker http://stason.org/ mod_perl Guide --- http://perl.apache.org mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://use.perl.org

Re: Apache-Test subdirectory has moved (again)

for me. % rm -rf Apache-Test/ % svn up Apache-Test At revision 153479. it doesn't fetch the new Apache-Test. It seems that only a completely new checkout of the whole modperl-2.0 brings it in. -- __ Stas BekmanJAm_pH

Re: Apache-Test subdirectory has moved (again)

. -- __ Stas BekmanJAm_pH -- Just Another mod_perl Hacker http://stason.org/ mod_perl Guide --- http://perl.apache.org mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://use.perl.org http://apacheweek.com http://modperlbook.org http://apache.org http://ticketmaster.com

Re: Apache-Test subdirectory has moved (again)

to be. Thanks for doing the moving work, Geoff and Justin! -- __ Stas BekmanJAm_pH -- Just Another mod_perl Hacker http://stason.org/ mod_perl Guide --- http://perl.apache.org mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://use.perl.org

Re: Apache-Test subdirectory has moved (again)

for me. % rm -rf Apache-Test/ % svn up Apache-Test At revision 153479. it doesn't fetch the new Apache-Test. It seems that only a completely new checkout of the whole modperl-2.0 brings it in. -- __ Stas BekmanJAm_pH

Re: Apache-Test subdirectory has moved

to to get that setup. geoff++ -- __ Stas BekmanJAm_pH -- Just Another mod_perl Hacker http://stason.org/ mod_perl Guide --- http://perl.apache.org mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://use.perl.org http://apacheweek.com http

Re: Apache-Test subdirectory has moved

if you have modified files in it. should svn switch somehow do the trick instead? -- __ Stas BekmanJAm_pH -- Just Another mod_perl Hacker http://stason.org/ mod_perl Guide --- http://perl.apache.org mailto:[EMAIL

Re: Apache-Test subdirectory has moved

. And maybe moving testing.pod there would be great too. s/testing.pod/tutorial.pod/? And of course links to it need to be adjusted too, to reflect the new location. (and Apache/README and other docs, like .pm files) -- __ Stas Bekman

Re: loading mod_perl first?

= '!mod_perl.c', $cfg); +$self-preamble(IfModule = '!mod_perl.c', $cfg); } -- __ Stas BekmanJAm_pH -- Just Another mod_perl Hacker http://stason.org/ mod_perl Guide --- http://perl.apache.org mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: Apache-Test subdirectory has moved

Stas Bekman wrote: Geoffrey Young wrote: Also Geoff please don't forget to update the documentation. Both inside the module and at perl.apache.org docs. Thanks. I couldn't find any mentions of the location of the repository outside of README-SVN. do you know of others? if you don't find any

Re: mod_status and Req

will be done by someone else :) I was just about to get this done :) Jim, what would it take to backport it to 2.0? I see that 149550 changes ap_time_process_request API, but it's an internal API, no? -- __ Stas BekmanJAm_pH

2.1: release showstopper: * the edge connection filter cannot be removed

that) and once 2.2 is released you can't do that anymore. -- __ Stas BekmanJAm_pH -- Just Another mod_perl Hacker http://stason.org/ mod_perl Guide --- http://perl.apache.org mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http

Re: mod_status and Req

Jim Jagielski wrote: Stas Bekman wrote: Jim Jagielski wrote: Justin Erenkrantz wrote: --On Wednesday, February 2, 2005 1:43 PM -0500 Jim Jagielski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Any reason why we don't enable reporting of Req? I have a 2.1 patch ready to go, but I don't know why we don't do

Re: Apache-Test

Oden Eriksson wrote: onsdag 26 januari 2005 00.47 skrev Stas Bekman: One thing I want to figure out is that note in README that suggests to write httpd.conf.in. Can we nuke that, or do you use that? Please leave as is. It can come handy. I for one wasn't able to get it to work as it's documented

Re: A-T: httpd.conf.in

these guidelines: http://perl.apache.org/bugs/ -- __ Stas BekmanJAm_pH -- Just Another mod_perl Hacker http://stason.org/ mod_perl Guide --- http://perl.apache.org mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://use.perl.org http

Re: Apache-Test

. :) -- __ Stas BekmanJAm_pH -- Just Another mod_perl Hacker http://stason.org/ mod_perl Guide --- http://perl.apache.org mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://use.perl.org http://apacheweek.com http://modperlbook.org http://apache.org http://ticketmaster.com

Re: Apache-Test

at the code though. -- __ Stas BekmanJAm_pH -- Just Another mod_perl Hacker http://stason.org/ mod_perl Guide --- http://perl.apache.org mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://use.perl.org http://apacheweek.com http

Re: Apache-Test

Oden Eriksson wrote: torsdag 13 januari 2005 16.15 skrev Stas Bekman: Oden Eriksson wrote: [...] The system is clean except for parts of mod_perl 1.x that seems to be a requisite to get this mod_perl pick up missing pieces. Here's what's installed: what do you mean requisite? you mean mp2

Re: A-T: httpd.conf.in

are on your own. I still can't understand what's wrong with the autogenerated httpd.conf, that you need to write your own. Please explain. -- __ Stas BekmanJAm_pH -- Just Another mod_perl Hacker http://stason.org

Re: Apache-Test

/vendor_perl/5.8.5/x86_64-linux-thread-multi/mod_perl_tuning.pod -- __ Stas BekmanJAm_pH -- Just Another mod_perl Hacker http://stason.org/ mod_perl Guide --- http://perl.apache.org mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http

[A-T patch] extend which() to search under perl's bin

) { if ($ENV{HOME} and not WIN32) { # only works on Unix, but that's normal: # on Win32 the shell doesn't have special treatment of '~' -- __ Stas BekmanJAm_pH -- Just Another mod_perl Hacker http

Re: Apache-Test

you think it's a misleading message? I guess we could remove it if MP_INST_APACHE2=1 is used explicitly. -- __ Stas BekmanJAm_pH -- Just Another mod_perl Hacker http://stason.org/ mod_perl Guide --- http

Re: Apache-Test

Stas Bekman wrote: Maybe it's a thing of the past, or I'm just too tired right now. At one time I saw something like Found mod_perl-1.x, good, will install relatively to Apache2/. And that message was despite the MP_INST_APACHE2=1 thing. Hmm, do you think it's a misleading message? I guess we

Re: Recent problem with Apache::Test v. 1.19

up (precisely under 5.6.x). If there are problems with Cwd please contact the author of that module. I've added the prerequisite when I saw that it's available on CPAN and builds fine on linux under 5.6. -- __ Stas Bekman

A-T: httpd.conf.in

lost in the flurry of changes. I think we should implement it, since if someone is very unhappy about the autogenerated httpd.conf they can supply their custom httpd.conf.in -- __ Stas BekmanJAm_pH -- Just Another

Re: Recent problem with Apache::Test v. 1.19

Christopher H. Laco wrote: Stas Bekman wrote: [snip] The requirement for Cwd 2.06 was needed to get the tests running under -T, which was otherwise blowing up (precisely under 5.6.x). If there are Just for my learning, which version of -T? [t/mytest.t] #!perl -wT use Apache::Test; or PerlTaint

Re: [apache-2.1.3] buffering content in input filter

/perl/modperl/trunk/t/filter/TestFilter/in_bbs_consume.pm?rev=106958view=markup -- __ Stas BekmanJAm_pH -- Just Another mod_perl Hacker http://stason.org/ mod_perl Guide --- http://perl.apache.org mailto:[EMAIL

resolving the removing the first connection filter in chain bug

. Original Message Subject: [BUG] in 2.0's ap_read_request with regards to removing the first connection filter in chain Date: Fri, 23 May 2003 14:01:45 +1000 From: Stas Bekman [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: dev@httpd.apache.org Organization: Hope, Humanized To: dev@httpd.apache.org

[A-T patch] changing should_skip_module to support regex skip patterns

/\.(s[ol]|dll)$/.c/; #mod_info.so = mod_info.c +$name =~ s/\.dll$/.c/; #mod_info.so = mod_info.c $name =~ s/^lib/mod_/; #libphp4.so = mod_php4.c $name = $modname_alias{$name} if $modname_alias{$name}; -- __ Stas

Re: [PATCH] Allow loading builtin dso modules

that too, but didn't have a chance to look at it yet. do you have a patch? On Sun, 19 Dec 2004 23:46:59 -0500, Stas Bekman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: (find_and_load_module): New. I like the find_and_load_module wrapper as it refactors some code dups

Re: [PATCH] Allow loading builtin dso modules

Chia-Liang Kao wrote: Just produced one. On Sat, 25 Dec 2004 09:51:37 -0500, Stas Bekman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I've noticed that too, but didn't have a chance to look at it yet. do you have a patch? Patching locally against mirror source thanks Chia-Liang Kao, committed with a tiny tweak

Re: A-T: testmore failures

is in. -- __ Stas BekmanJAm_pH -- Just Another mod_perl Hacker http://stason.org/ mod_perl Guide --- http://perl.apache.org mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://use.perl.org http://apacheweek.com http://modperlbook.org http://apache.org http://ticketmaster.com

Apache-TestItSelf and Apache-TestMe

/apache2_modules_testitself_config.pm -- __ Stas BekmanJAm_pH -- Just Another mod_perl Hacker http://stason.org/ mod_perl Guide --- http://perl.apache.org mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://use.perl.org http://apacheweek.com

A-T: make dist puzzle

for some reason A-T's 'make dist' includes files which aren't in MANIFEST: Apache-Test-1.18-dev/.mypacklist Apache-Test-1.18-dev/t/cgi-bin/cookies.pl anybody has a clue why? -- __ Stas BekmanJAm_pH -- Just Another

Re: [PATCH] Allow loading builtin dso modules

-- __ Stas BekmanJAm_pH -- Just Another mod_perl Hacker http://stason.org/ mod_perl Guide --- http://perl.apache.org mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://use.perl.org http://apacheweek.com http://modperlbook.org http://apache.org http

Re: [PATCH] Allow loading builtin dso modules

{LoadModule ${sym}_module $mod_path\n}); +} +return 1; +} -- __ Stas BekmanJAm_pH -- Just Another mod_perl Hacker http://stason.org/ mod_perl Guide --- http://perl.apache.org mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http

Re: [PATCH] Allow loading builtin dso modules

Chia-Liang Kao wrote: On Sun, Dec 19, 2004 at 11:46:59PM -0500, Stas Bekman wrote: But I don't think A-T should try to load any module someone may need in their test suite. It does have a bunch of mp2 specific things which should be wiped away and moved into the mp2 test suite. Yes, originally I

Re: [PATCH] Allow loading builtin dso modules

Stas Bekman wrote: Chia-Liang Kao wrote: On Mon, 20 Dec 2004 00:14:08 -0500, Stas Bekman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: As said earlier, this was to make A-T's test suite actually runs the cookie tests when mod_cgi is built as dso, and has nothing to do with my own tests. Aha! That wasn't clear from

A-T: testmore failures

. -- __ Stas BekmanJAm_pH -- Just Another mod_perl Hacker http://stason.org/ mod_perl Guide --- http://perl.apache.org mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://use.perl.org http://apacheweek.com http://modperlbook.org http://apache.org http://ticketmaster.com

Re: svn commit: r111983 - /httpd/test/trunk/perl-framework/Apache-Test/ToDo

might be of interest to you. -- __ Stas BekmanJAm_pH -- Just Another mod_perl Hacker http://stason.org/ mod_perl Guide --- http://perl.apache.org mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://use.perl.org http://apacheweek.com http

Re: svn commit: r111983 - /httpd/test/trunk/perl-framework/Apache-Test/ToDo

on the process, I didn't submit a bug report as of yet. OK, but make sure that we contrinue modperl thread on the modperl dev list and not here :) Thanks. -- __ Stas BekmanJAm_pH -- Just Another mod_perl Hacker http

Apache-Test/Makefile.PL r105822

redefined at ./Makefile.PL line 148. so we need to do the usual ugly workaround for MM :( Can you fix those? I can do it if you don't have the time. -- __ Stas BekmanJAm_pH -- Just Another mod_perl Hacker http://stason.org

Re: Apache-Test/Makefile.PL r105822

just use: *MY::foo = sub ...; but unrelated we need to workaround with colliding identical function in mp2. I'll take care of it. -- __ Stas BekmanJAm_pH -- Just Another mod_perl Hacker http://stason.org/ mod_perl

Re: [PATCH] module2path/module2url pod

. -- __ Stas BekmanJAm_pH -- Just Another mod_perl Hacker http://stason.org/ mod_perl Guide --- http://perl.apache.org mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://use.perl.org http://apacheweek.com http://modperlbook.org http://apache.org http://ticketmaster.com

Re: apxs calls on Win32

Randy Kobes wrote: On Wed, 8 Dec 2004, Stas Bekman wrote: I've requested to restore it (you indeed don't have it). Let me know if you want me to commit this or wait for when you get the access again (should hopefully be restored tomorrow). Thanks, Stas. If you have a minute, feel free to commit

Re: [OT] CVS - SVN Thoughts

it is? Personally I haven't done any moves myself yet, so I can't tell. -- __ Stas BekmanJAm_pH -- Just Another mod_perl Hacker http://stason.org/ mod_perl Guide --- http://perl.apache.org mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http

Re: [PATCH] module2path/module2url pod

). -- __ Stas BekmanJAm_pH -- Just Another mod_perl Hacker http://stason.org/ mod_perl Guide --- http://perl.apache.org mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://use.perl.org http://apacheweek.com http://modperlbook.org http://apache.org http

Re: [PATCH] Test TestRequest pod

:) -- __ Stas BekmanJAm_pH -- Just Another mod_perl Hacker http://stason.org/ mod_perl Guide --- http://perl.apache.org mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://use.perl.org http://apacheweek.com http://modperlbook.org http://apache.org http://ticketmaster.com

Re: [PATCH] Test TestRequest pod

Christopher H. Laco wrote: Stas Bekman wrote: Since these patches will span A-T and modperl, should I send them seperately to both lists, of send both sets to one list of the other? if they include modperl and a-t send them to the modperl dev list. if only a-t post them here. thanks

Re: [PATCH] Test TestRequest pod

. -- __ Stas BekmanJAm_pH -- Just Another mod_perl Hacker http://stason.org/ mod_perl Guide --- http://perl.apache.org mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://use.perl.org http://apacheweek.com http://modperlbook.org http://apache.org http://ticketmaster.com

Re: [PATCH] Test TestRequest pod

. -- __ Stas BekmanJAm_pH -- Just Another mod_perl Hacker http://stason.org/ mod_perl Guide --- http://perl.apache.org mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://use.perl.org http://apacheweek.com http://modperlbook.org http://apache.org http://ticketmaster.com

Re: [PATCH] Test TestRequest pod

Christopher H. Laco wrote: Stas Bekman wrote: Christopher H. Laco wrote: Christopher H. Laco wrote: Christopher H. Laco wrote: OK, not that I've got a clean nmake/nmake test, I'm back on this. I'm going to just start with t/modperl and go from there. Since these patches will span A-T and modperl

Re: [PATCH] Test TestRequest pod

it does: Apache::TestRequest::module($module); or are you talking about a different test? I know there's a couple more lurkers in there, but maybe I'll stumble across those during another round of module2path-ing. -=Chris -- __ Stas

Re: apxs calls on Win32

to the right list anyway. So there is no way you can commit the two at once I think. -- __ Stas BekmanJAm_pH -- Just Another mod_perl Hacker http://stason.org/ mod_perl Guide --- http://perl.apache.org mailto:[EMAIL

Re: apxs calls on Win32

that these calls succeeed. -- __ Stas BekmanJAm_pH -- Just Another mod_perl Hacker http://stason.org/ mod_perl Guide --- http://perl.apache.org mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://use.perl.org http://apacheweek.com http

Re: [PATCH] Test TestRequest pod

Christopher H. Laco wrote: Christopher H. Laco wrote: Stas Bekman wrote: Still someone needs to do the work and verify that things are working. That will fun in and of itself. Right now, the only thing close to meeting the requirements of running the overall tests is my 5.6.1 install on my XP

Re: [PATCH] Test TestRequest pod

#Request_and_Response_Methods but committed anyway :) -- __ Stas BekmanJAm_pH -- Just Another mod_perl Hacker http://stason.org/ mod_perl Guide --- http://perl.apache.org mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://use.perl.org

Re: [PATCH] Test TestRequest pod

Christopher H. Laco wrote: Stas Bekman wrote: Christopher H. Laco wrote: OK, I'm a programmer, not a writer. Be gentle. Nothing major, just the a mention of cookie_jar and additional headers via the second param in GET (and probably others?). While I was at it, I made sure all of the need

Re: [PATCH] Test TestRequest pod

} { my $url = Apache::TestRequest::module2url($module); GET $url; # GET http://localhost:8545/Foo__bar; } grep modperl-2.0/t for Apache::TestRequest::hostport to see what I'm talking about. -- __ Stas BekmanJAm_pH

Re: need to require Cwd 2.06 for A-T

Stas Bekman wrote: I know we tried to avoid external dependencies, but Cwd coming with 5.6.x is unusable under -T. At the moment this breaks some mp2 tests (the problem comes from A-T, which indirectly invokes Cwd::cwd via File::Spec's rel2abs. I've tried to code a workaround, but it doesn't

Re: need to require Cwd 2.06 for A-T

Geoffrey Young wrote: Stas Bekman wrote: Stas Bekman wrote: I know we tried to avoid external dependencies, but Cwd coming with 5.6.x is unusable under -T. At the moment this breaks some mp2 tests (the problem comes from A-T, which indirectly invokes Cwd::cwd via File::Spec's rel2abs. I've tried

Re: [PATCH] Test TestRequest pod

Christopher H. Laco wrote: Stas Bekman wrote: Christopher H. Laco wrote: On that note, what else can I work on? Apparently I'm a glutton for punishment. Not sure, there are all kind of things in the ToDo file, but they all mostly obscure. I think all kind of refactoring would be great. One

Re: [PATCH] Test TestRequest pod

Christopher H. Laco wrote: Stas Bekman wrote: I think all kind of refactoring would be great. One thing I wanted to do for tests again vhosts, is to add this function next to module2path(): sub module2url { my $module = shift; my $scheme = shift || http; Apache::TestRequest

Re: [PATCH] Test TestRequest pod

Christopher H. Laco wrote: Stas Bekman wrote: Of course it should take the necessary precautions for when / is and isn't included, etc. What do you mean? Examples? Well, let's go with the running sample: sub module2url { my $module = shift; my $scheme = shift || http; Apache

Re: signals under worker mpm?

-- __ Stas BekmanJAm_pH -- Just Another mod_perl Hacker http://stason.org/ mod_perl Guide --- http://perl.apache.org mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://use.perl.org http://apacheweek.com http://modperlbook.org http://apache.org http://ticketmaster.com

kill -HUP vs. httpd -k graceful

panic: pthread_key_create and dumps core... whereas httpd -k graceful doesn't have this problem. Unfortunately I can't tell you which MPM he was using, since he didn't bother to tell. -- __ Stas BekmanJAm_pH

Re: kill -HUP vs. httpd -k graceful

Jeff Trawick wrote: On Thu, 02 Dec 2004 13:41:07 -0500, Stas Bekman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Is there a difference between kill -HUP and httpd -k graceful? One user has reported problems with using kill -HUP graceful uses signal USR1; ungraceful restart uses HUP; Thanks Jeff. not expected

httpd-test pages need to be updated to point to svn not cvs

http://httpd.apache.org/test/ is outdated (s/cvs/svn/)... thanks. -- __ Stas BekmanJAm_pH -- Just Another mod_perl Hacker http://stason.org/ mod_perl Guide --- http://perl.apache.org mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http

Re: httpd-test pages need to be updated to point to svn not cvs

Randy Kobes wrote: On Tue, 30 Nov 2004, Stas Bekman wrote: http://httpd.apache.org/test/ is outdated (s/cvs/svn/)... thanks. I just changed, via svn, the site/docs/test/index.html and site/xdocs/test/index.xml pages to reflect this. Thanks Randy However, I just wanted to verify that, to get

Re: FW: Re: Apache::TestRequest + Cookies

see what was applied at the URLs quoted at the top of this email. Now looking forward for docs updates. Thanks again. -- __ Stas BekmanJAm_pH -- Just Another mod_perl Hacker http://stason.org/ mod_perl Guide

Re: signals under worker mpm?

of the interrupted processing, but implementing that sort of service is not trivial. OUT -- __ Stas BekmanJAm_pH -- Just Another mod_perl Hacker http://stason.org/ mod_perl Guide --- http://perl.apache.org mailto:[EMAIL

Re: Apache::TestRequest + Cookies

... -- __ Stas BekmanJAm_pH -- Just Another mod_perl Hacker http://stason.org/ mod_perl Guide --- http://perl.apache.org mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://use.perl.org http://apacheweek.com http://modperlbook.org http://apache.org http://ticketmaster.com

Re: Apache::TestRequest + Cookies

in modperl-2.0 repository this test couple: t/response/TestModperl/sameinterp.pm t/modperl/sameinterp.t -- __ Stas BekmanJAm_pH -- Just Another mod_perl Hacker http://stason.org/ mod_perl Guide --- http://perl.apache.org

Re: FW: Re: Apache::TestRequest + Cookies

we use that directly, or just borrow the idea? Why don't you first post what you had on your mind. May be your idea doesn't need that at all. -- __ Stas BekmanJAm_pH -- Just Another mod_perl Hacker http://stason.org

Re: FW: Re: Apache::TestRequest + Cookies

Christopher H. Laco wrote: Stas Bekman wrote: [snip] Why don't you first post what you had on your mind. May be your idea doesn't need that at all. Well, here's what I was thinking. First, write a quick and dirty mod_perl handler that looked for a specific cookie; let's say 'ApacheTest

Re: FW: Re: Apache::TestRequest + Cookies

Christopher H. Laco wrote: Stas Bekman wrote: Sounds good. Though it'll probably need to leave in the modperl2's test suite and not Apache-Test's one. but let's see the code first and then see where it's the best to apply it. You can use the http://perl.apache.org/~geoff/Apache-Test-skeleton-mp2

Re: Pickyness question

to called subroutine. so if it has an empty prototype, that would be an error. -- __ Stas BekmanJAm_pH -- Just Another mod_perl Hacker http://stason.org/ mod_perl Guide --- http://perl.apache.org mailto:[EMAIL

Re: svn commit: r109235 - /httpd/test/trunk/perl-framework/Apache-Test/t/redirect.t

:) -- __ Stas BekmanJAm_pH -- Just Another mod_perl Hacker http://stason.org/ mod_perl Guide --- http://perl.apache.org mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://use.perl.org http://apacheweek.com http://modperlbook.org http://apache.org http://ticketmaster.com

Re: extending t_cmp to handle !t_cmp?

. -- __ Stas BekmanJAm_pH -- Just Another mod_perl Hacker http://stason.org/ mod_perl Guide --- http://perl.apache.org mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://use.perl.org http://apacheweek.com http://modperlbook.org http://apache.org http://ticketmaster.com

Re: extending t_cmp to handle !t_cmp?

Stas Bekman wrote: Of course another alternative is to bundle a sufficient version of T::M under t/. that's an idea. so long as it's not installed with 'make install'. or indexed by cpan either, I suppose. anything living under t/ is not installed on 'make install' and not scanned by PAUSE

Re: Apache::TestRequest + Cookies

/t for examples. -- __ Stas BekmanJAm_pH -- Just Another mod_perl Hacker http://stason.org/ mod_perl Guide --- http://perl.apache.org mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://use.perl.org http://apacheweek.com http

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >