Re: VOTE: RC0 Release apache-solr-ref-guide-4.8.pdf

: Please VOTE to release the following RC0 as apache-solr-ref-guide-4.8.pdf ... : : https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/solr/ref-guide/apache-solr-ref-guide-4.8-RC0 +1 from me for this sha... a51de6f8b96fc302c57af4a174b19c1b1efc4fd9 apache-solr-ref-guide-4.8.pdf -Hoss http://www.l

VOTE: RC0 Release apache-solr-ref-guide-4.8.pdf

(Note: cross posted to general, please confine replies to dev@) Please VOTE to release the following RC0 as apache-solr-ref-guide-4.8.pdf ... https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/solr/ref-guide/apache-solr-ref-guide-4.8-RC0 2 important notes about this RC... 1) Due to a known bug in

Re: 4.8 Solr Ref Guide Release Plan

: I'm still trying to document some stuff (async core admin calls) but I'm : having issues saving that stuff. : Once I'm able to save that, I should be done with everything that's on my : mind for 4.8 documentation. Yeah ... cwiki seems to be having some performance issues at the moment, so rele

RE: svn commit: r1589782 - /lucene/dev/branches/branch_4x/lucene/core/src/test/org/apache/lucene/inde x/TestTerms.java

: Why not use the @SuppressCodes annotation? mike mentioned this in his reply to the jenkins failure... >> I committed a fix, disabling Lucene3x for that test case. I didn't >> use @SuppressCodecs because the other tests should work fine w/ >> Lucene3x. ..perhaps putting this in the test as a

Re: [CONF] Apache Solr Reference Guide > Collections API

Is ADDREPLICA something that supports the "async=true" option? If so it should be noted in the input parameters. : Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2014 18:46:00 + (UTC) : From: "Noble Paul (Confluence)" : Reply-To: dev@lucene.apache.org : To: comm...@lucene.apache.org : Subject: [CONF] Apache Solr Ref

Re: 4.8 Solr Ref Guide Release Plan

: 2) I'll review the TODO list arround 24 hours after the first Lucene/Solr 4.8 : RC VOTE is called -- if it doesn't look like anyone is in hte middle of : working on stuff, I'll go ahead and cut a ref-guide RC. If it looks like FYI: Tim Potter reached out to me that he's working on docing up th

4.8 Solr Ref Guide Release Plan

Hey folks, I'm volunteering to be the ref guide RM, and my plan of attack is as follows... 0) We've had the 4_8 branch for a fair while now, at this point there shouldn't be much question which *features* will make it into 4.8, the only things outstanding should be bug fixes. Which means

Re: svn commit: r1586473 - /lucene/dev/trunk/lucene/analysis/icu/src/java/org/apache/lucene/analysis/ icu/ICUNormalizer2CharFilter.java

: the functionality is unreleased. So is it really interesting to anyone? Ah, ok ... in that case i would advocate labling this type of commit with the same initial Jira that added the class -- that way anyone looking at the jira and wanting to generate a patch (to backport for their personal

Re: svn commit: r1586473 - /lucene/dev/trunk/lucene/analysis/icu/src/java/org/apache/lucene/analysis/ icu/ICUNormalizer2CharFilter.java

rmuir: shouldn't this have a Jira to track the fix & record it in CHANGES.txt ? : Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2014 21:30:53 - : From: rm...@apache.org : Reply-To: dev@lucene.apache.org : To: comm...@lucene.apache.org : Subject: svn commit: r1586473 - : /lucene/dev/trunk/lucene/analysis/icu/src/ja

Re: [VOTE] Lucene / Solr 4.7.2 (take two)

: http://people.apache.org/~rmuir/staging_area/lucene_solr_4_7_2_r1586229/ +1 to the artifacts with these SHAs... 47ee3825d8c0e0c67f7e17d84c9e8f8a896ccf7b *lucene-4.7.2-src.tgz d5bee6e4245b8ba4cf7ecf3660b4b71dc4dd8471 *lucene-4.7.2.tgz 5a54e386b0284fc90fd9804979a80913e33a74df *lucene-4.7.2.zip 1

Re: [JENKINS] Lucene-trunk-Linux-Java7-64-test-only - Build # 82046 - Failure!

FWIW: reproduce line does not reproduce for me. : Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2014 21:05:16 +0200 (CEST) : From: buil...@flonkings.com : Reply-To: dev@lucene.apache.org : To: dev@lucene.apache.org, sim...@apache.org, uschind...@apache.org : Subject: [JENKINS] Lucene-trunk-Linux-Java7-64-test-only - Build #

Re: [JENKINS] Lucene-Solr-4.x-Linux (32bit/ibm-j9-jdk7) - Build # 9867 - Failure!

: It miscompiled readVLong recently in another test run. When this : happened tens or hundreds of tests failed because it returned wrong : results. Is readVLong something we can/should add to the "-Xjit:exclude" param in jenkins when using J9? : On Thu, Apr 3, 2014 at 1:10 PM, Chris

Re: [JENKINS] Lucene-Solr-4.x-Linux (32bit/ibm-j9-jdk7) - Build # 9867 - Failure!

: Build: http://jenkins.thetaphi.de/job/Lucene-Solr-4.x-Linux/9867/ : Java: 32bit/ibm-j9-jdk7 -Xjit:exclude={org/apache/lucene/util/fst/FST.pack(IIF)Lorg/apache/lucene/util/fst/FST;} Anybody have any idea what's going on here? possible J9 bug? 2 different (non distributed single threaded) So

Re: [JENKINS] Lucene-Solr-trunk-Windows (32bit/jdk1.7.0_51) - Build # 3917 - Failure!

Tracked in SOLR-5948 so we don't lose the logs due ot jenkins job expiration... https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-5948 : Date: Wed, 2 Apr 2014 09:56:19 -0700 (MST) : From: Chris Hostetter : To: dev@lucene.apache.org : Subject: Re: [JENKINS] Lucene-Solr-trunk-Windows (

Re: [JENKINS] Lucene-Solr-trunk-Windows (32bit/jdk1.7.0_51) - Build # 3917 - Failure!

This is a new test (committed yesterday) but it does't create/write/modify any files on disk directly -- just using the regular distributed test setup. Can anyone with a windows machine reproduce this failure to cleanup the workspace? : 1 tests failed. FAILED: : junit.framework.TestSuite.o

Re: [JENKINS] Lucene-trunk-Linux-Java7-64-test-only - Build # 80733 - Failure!

: I don't know why this line was added in r1575538 "don't try to index : megaterms". Mike do you know? : : analyzer.setMaxTokenLength(TestUtil.nextInt(random(), 1, : IndexWriter.MAX_TERM_LENGTH)); I don't know if that specific change in that specific test is a bug or not (I haven't looked a

Re: [VOTE] Lucene / Solr 4.7.1 RC1

: +1 to the following artifacts (SHA1)... df0e646c4e63e25387ba37099faafa0c8797f560 *lucene-4.7.1-src.tgz 12fcc1189bb76fe02093a0d412e086e7daaa332f *lucene-4.7.1.tgz 3310f9f907f493733dfe4169e3a226115efd5e30 *lucene-

Re: [JENKINS] Lucene-Solr-4.x-Linux (64bit/jdk1.7.0_60-ea-b10) - Build # 9796 - Failure!

Looks like a problem with SOLR-5909, upgrading carrot... https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-5909?focusedCommentId=13946711&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#comment-13946711 : Date: Tue, 25 Mar 2014 15:34:56 + (UTC) : From: Policeman Jenkins Serve

Nag: Re: VOTE: Release apache-solr-ref-guide-4.7.pdf (RC1)

FWIW: It's been well over 72 hours, but so far we've only gotten 2 binding +1 votes for RC1 from PMC members (there was an additional non binding +1 from cassandra, but no 0, or -1 votes) PMC members: please review RC1 and cast your vote. : Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2014 10:59:12 -0600 : From: Cassan

Re: VOTE: Release apache-solr-ref-guide-4.7.pdf (RC1)

: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/solr/ref-guide/apache-solr-ref-guide-4.7-RC1/ +1... bd11b47b8994c40314d1e62c853dc90f5b78e049 apache-solr-ref-guide-4.7.pdf -Hoss http://www.lucidworks.com/ - To unsubscribe,

Re: VOTE: Release apache-solr-ref-guide-4.7.pdf

: : https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/solr/ref-guide/apache-solr-ref-guide-4.7-RC0/ FWIW... * sarowe noted on IRC that this RC doesn't have the footer w/page numbers * cassandra used a private confluence install to reproduce w/our layout & css * cassandra then realized that deleting

Re: VOTE: Release apache-solr-ref-guide-4.7.pdf

: I've generated a release candidate for the 4.7 version of the Solr Ref : Guide. : : https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/solr/ref-guide/apache-solr-ref-guide-4.7-RC0/ +1 to releasing this as apache-solr-ref-guide-4.7.pdf ... $ cat apache-solr-ref-guide-4.7.pdf.sha1 abd98ed3e53211d90

Re: Solr Reference Guide pages; turn off comments?

: Subject: Re: Solr Reference Guide pages; turn off comments? Comments are pretty criticial to the current workflow o the ref guide, so i can't imagine turning them off completley. : +1 to both ideas: delete at the time we address a comment (rendering : the comment obsolete) and/or do so at r

Re: Solr Ref Guide for 4.7

FYI: if you hadn't noticed, we've got a TODO page tracking all of the "features" listed in changes ... https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/solr/Internal+-+TODO+List ...if you see something something isn't done yet, please feel free to help out with it -- even if it is done (ie: struck

Re: Ensuring a test uses a codec supporting DocValues

: >just put this annotation at the class level: : > : >@SuppressCodecs("Lucene3x") Be aware of subtleties though... Just because a codec supports docvalues doesn't mean it supports *all* of the docvalue features you need. Example: the cursor tests failed in extremeley weird non-reproducible w

Re: Getting ready for Lucene/Solr 4.7

: I am assuming the snapshot of the ref guide is also taken for the release, : so does that mean changes in ref guide has to be made before the snapshot : (of the release)? or is the ref guide snapshot taken seperately from the : release snapshot? They are done independently since they come from

Re: DISCUSS: Go "all in" on github integration

https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-7317 : Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2014 15:29:03 -0700 (MST) : From: Chris Hostetter : To: Lucene Dev : Subject: DISCUSS: Go "all in" on github integration : : : As some folks may know, apache infra has been making lots of improvements to : how th

Re: [JENKINS-MAVEN] Lucene-Solr-Maven-trunk #1103: POMs out of sync

Hmmm... lots of compilation failures from Maven build regarding http-client classess not found? This seems to have been a problem with the maven build since Feb 10... https://builds.apache.org/job/Lucene-Solr-Maven-trunk/1101/ ...looking at the commits, i think this looks like the suspicious

DISCUSS: Go "all in" on github integration

As some folks may know, apache infra has been making lots of improvements to how the users of the github mirrors of ASF projects can interact with the regular apache dev cycle. A while back, some of these features were enabled for the Lucene/Solr code base, and we have already had a few cont

Re: [VOTE] Release PyLucene 4.6.1-1

: A release candidate is available from: : http://people.apache.org/~vajda/staging_area/ +1 to the artifacts with these sigs... hossman@frisbee:~/tmp/pylucene_4_6_1$ cat pylucene-4.6.1-1-src.tar.gz.md5 bac17fb194f16273afe1d0428e579d5b pylucene-4.6.1-1-src.tar.gz hossman@frisbee:~/tmp/pylucene_4

Re: Having trouble applying a PR to svn

: Personally, never tried svn patch. Yeah ... i think it has some explicit assumptions about the patch file being generated by "svn diff" so it can use some of the header bits to know when files mentioned in a patch should be "svn rm", "svn mv", or "svn add" In particular, if you note that fi

Re: Where to add custom mbean

There's really no generic place in solr to say "Here's an MBean, instantiate it on startup so i can monitor it" ... all of the existing monitoring & metrics reporting scaffolding is based arround the idea that if there's a metric you want to monitor that metric *belongs* to something that is u

REMINDER: Call For Papers: ApacheCon North America 2014 -- ends Feb 1st

(Note: cross posted, please keep any replies to general@lucene) Quick reminder that the CFP for ApacheCon (Denver) ends on Saturday... http://events.linuxfoundation.org/events/apachecon-north-america/program/cfp Ladies and Gentlemen, start writing your proposals. The Call For Papers for Apac

Re: [JENKINS] Lucene-Solr-4.x-MacOSX (64bit/jdk1.6.0) - Build # 1200 - Failure!

: REGRESSION: org.apache.solr.cloud.DistribCursorPagingTest.testDistribSearch : : Error Message: : walk already seen: 39 I can't reproduce this seed (or this type of failure with a bunch of looping on other seeds) and sarowe couldn't repro this seed on his mac either. I can't even think of a

Re: svn commit: r1557370 - in /lucene/dev/branches/branch_4x/solr/core/src/test/org/apache/solr: CursorPagingTest.java cloud/DistribCursorPagingTest.java

Thanks Rob, I always for get about that when backporting. : Date: Sat, 11 Jan 2014 12:37:36 - : From: rm...@apache.org : Reply-To: dev@lucene.apache.org : To: comm...@lucene.apache.org : Subject: svn commit: r1557370 - in : /lucene/dev/branches/branch_4x/solr/core/src/test/org/apache/so

Re: [JENKINS] Lucene-Solr-4.x-Linux (64bit/jdk1.7.0_60-ea-b02) - Build # 8922 - Still Failing!

FWIW: this seed reproduce for me on 4x... ant test -Dtestcase=TestDistribDocBasedVersion -Dtests.seed=791402573DC76F3C -Dtests.multiplier=3 -Dtests.slow=true -Dtests.locale=ar_IQ -Dtests.timezone=Antarctica/Rothera -Dtests.file.encoding=US-ASCII The test isn't doing anything odd with merges,

Re: [JENKINS] Lucene-Solr-4.x-Linux (64bit/jdk1.7.0_60-ea-b02) - Build # 8922 - Still Failing!

This is a test i'm familiar with, but the failure is aparently an assertion in IndexWriter._mergeInit that should probably get some more eyeballs on it... (Note: this is apparently 4x as of r1556643) : Build: http://jenkins.thetaphi.de/job/Lucene-Solr-4.x-Linux/8922/ : Java: 64bit/jdk1.7.0_60-

RE: svn commit: r1555367 - in /lucene/dev/trunk/solr: CHANGES.txt core/src/java/org/apache/solr/highlight/DefaultSolrHighlighter.java core/src/java/org/apache/solr/highlight/SolrHighlighter.java

ment posted when the patch was attached) https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2794?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel : : - : Uwe Schindler : H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen : http://www.thetaphi.de : eMail: u...@thetaphi.de : : : > -Orig

Re: svn commit: r1555367 - in /lucene/dev/trunk/solr: CHANGES.txt core/src/java/org/apache/solr/highlight/DefaultSolrHighlighter.java core/src/java/org/apache/solr/highlight/SolrHighlighter.java

I recognize that part of what happened here was a test of commiting a patch that came from a github pull request, and seeing how the commit affected the pull request metadata in github ... but ... Since there actually *is* a jira for this, and since the patch submitted via github appears to be

Re: svn commit: r1555084 - in /lucene/dev/branches/branch_4x: ./ solr/ solr/CHANGES.txt solr/core/ solr/core/src/java/org/apache/solr/cloud/OverseerCollectionProcessor.java

Is this a good candidate for 4.6.1? : Date: Fri, 03 Jan 2014 13:41:16 - : From: sha...@apache.org : Reply-To: dev@lucene.apache.org : To: comm...@lucene.apache.org : Subject: svn commit: r1555084 - in /lucene/dev/branches/branch_4x: ./ solr/ : solr/CHANGES.txt solr/core/ : solr/core/

Re: mlockall?

: Right, right, I meant to say that I know about that blog post but my Q : is: : If mlockall is such a good thing, why not have it in Lucene or Solr? Or : maybe mlockall is not such a good or simple thing? Beyond writting that agent jar, I never put much effort into thinking about integrati

Re: svn commit: r1547738 - /lucene/board-reports/2013/board-report-december.txt

: Subject: svn commit: r1547738 - : /lucene/board-reports/2013/board-report-december.txt +1, nothing to add. -Hoss http://www.lucidworks.com/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional comman

Re: VOTE: RC0 Release apache-solr-ref-guide-4.6.pdf

ibute improvements & corrections. : Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2013 11:34:58 -0700 (MST) : From: Chris Hostetter : To: Lucene Dev : Cc: gene...@lucene.apache.org : Subject: VOTE: RC0 Release apache-solr-ref-guide-4.6.pdf : : : Please VOTE to release the following as apache-solr-ref-guid

Re: VOTE: RC0 Release apache-solr-ref-guide-4.6.pdf

+1 from me. : Please VOTE to release the following as apache-solr-ref-guide-4.6.pdf ... : : https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/solr/ref-guide/apache-solr-ref-guide-4.6-RC0/ : : $ cat apache-solr-ref-guide-4.6.pdf.sha1 : 7ad494c5a3cdc085e01a54d507ae33a75cc319e6 apache-solr-ref-guide

VOTE: RC0 Release apache-solr-ref-guide-4.6.pdf

Please VOTE to release the following as apache-solr-ref-guide-4.6.pdf ... https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/solr/ref-guide/apache-solr-ref-guide-4.6-RC0/ $ cat apache-solr-ref-guide-4.6.pdf.sha1 7ad494c5a3cdc085e01a54d507ae33a75cc319e6 apache-solr-ref-guide-4.6.pdf -Hoss -

Re: Solr Guide Example for EmbeddedSolrServer Uses An None Existing Method

Furkan: thanks for point this out. I went ahead and removed the bad examples and tried to better clarify that EmbeddedSolrServer isn't really recommended. I couldn't find any unused attachments -- maybe someone already deleted them? If you're still seeing them please send an updated link or

Re: 4.6 ReleaseNotes

fixed, thanks. : Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2013 17:10:56 + : From: Flavio Martins : Reply-To: dev@lucene.apache.org : To: dev@lucene.apache.org : Subject: Re: 4.6 ReleaseNotes : : Found a typo FreeTextSuggeser -> FreeTextSuggester : : Regards, : Flavio : : On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 12:45 PM, Simon

Re: 4.6 ReleaseNotes

: > The new formats are required to support field-level updates. They do not : > improve performance in any way, only add the fieldInfosGen (SegmentInfo) and : > dvGen (FieldInfos). I clarified in the release notes that these are required : > to support the field-level updates. Do you think we sho

Re: [VOTE] Lucene / Solr 4.6.0"

FWIW: Something is wonky with the LUCENE-5283 changes (which are on branch_4_6) making it impossible to run a single test from the top level directory. we should probably give dawid a chance to try and figure out the problem before respining as well. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCE

Re: I simply cannot be the only one seeing this....

I'm pretty sure this is a bug in the LUCENE-5283 changes... https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5283?focusedCommentId=13823212&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#comment-13823212 : Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2013 18:49:36 -0700 : From: Shawn Heisey : Reply-To

Re: 4.6 ReleaseNotes

: https://wiki.apache.org/lucene-java/ReleaseNote46 : : Feel free to add / optimize. I'd appreciate if somebody from Solr Land : could start the Solr Release notes, I am not on top of the changes I took a stab at it... https://wiki.apache.org/solr/ReleaseNote46 I think it would be useful if the

Re: help in getting sort to work on an indexed binary field

I'm not very familiar with the distributed sorting code, but based on your comments, and a quick skim of the functions you pointed to, it definitely seems like there are two problems here for people trying to implement custom sorting in custom FieldTypes... 1) QueryComponent.doFieldSortValues

Re: Need help regarding Boolean queries with queryparser

: of queryparser? why do we need a flexible query parser module for symbol : "&&" to work? Doesn't queryparser handle this? I suspect Uwe may have missunderstood your question due to the lack of details in your original question... : > In our search application , queries like test && usage

Re: VOTE: RC1 Release apache-solr-ref-guide-4.5.pdf

: Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2013 10:25:08 -0700 (MST) : Subject: VOTE: RC1 Release apache-solr-ref-guide-4.5.pdf I count 4 +1 votes (3 binding) and no -1 votes, so the VOTE passes. Thanks to everyone who helped out with editing/reviewing the doc. --- A few notes about the next steps... 1) I'l

Re: VOTE: RC1 Release apache-solr-ref-guide-4.5.pdf

: Subject: VOTE: RC1 Release apache-solr-ref-guide-4.5.pdf : https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/solr/ref-guide/apache-solr-ref-guide-4.5-RC1/ : : $ cat apache-solr-ref-guide-4.5.pdf.sha1 : 823859d10a794fc399afd12981c40b167c076b13 apache-solr-ref-guide-4.5.pdf +1 -Hoss -

VOTE: RC1 Release apache-solr-ref-guide-4.5.pdf

(Big thanks to everyone who chipped in in reviewing & improving on RC0!) Please vote to release the following artifacts (RC1) as the Apache Solr Reference Guide for 4.5... https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/solr/ref-guide/apache-solr-ref-guide-4.5-RC1/ $ cat apache-solr-ref-guide-

RE: 4.5 Solr RefGuide release plan: looking to cut an RC0 tomorow ~ 1PM GMT-6

: The scripts uploading the release artifacts to the DIST SVN repo should : use this URL to use the most recent keys file - see : buildAndPushRelease.py in the dev-tools/scripts folder. Please don't : edit the KEYS file manually, it should be consistent with the "official" : one. As noted in

Re: VOTE RC0 Release apache-solr-ref-guide-4.5.pdf"

Awesome work steve! I collected all of this up into a scratch page, let's see how many we can burn through easily and then post another RC... https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/solr/Internal+-+TODO+List -Hoss - To u

Re: 4.5 Solr RefGuide release plan: looking to cut an RC0 tomorow ~ 1PM GMT-6

: Cassandra has volunteered to be my guinea pig and try acting as RM for the 4.5 : guide, to help sanity check that the process i write up makes sense & can be : executed by someone who isn't me. FYI: I'm moving forward as RM for this doc relase since Cassandra ran into SVN authorization problem

VOTE RC0 Release apache-solr-ref-guide-4.5.pdf"

Please vote to release the following artifacts as the Apache Solr Reference Guide for 4.5... https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/solr/ref-guide/apache-solr-ref-guide-4.5-RC0/ $ cat apache-solr-ref-guide-4.5-RC0/apache-solr-ref-guide-4.5.pdf.sha1 ee40215d30f264d663f723ea2196b72b8cc5e

ANNOUNCE: Lucene/Solr Revolution EU 2013 - Session List & Early Bird Pricing

(NOTE: cross-posted to various lists, please reply only to general@lucene w/ any questions or follow ups) Hey folks, 2 announcements regarding the upcoming Lucene/Solr Revolution EU 2013 in Dublin (November 4-7)... ## 1) Session List Now Posted I'd like to thank everyone who helped vote f

4.5 Solr RefGuide release plan: looking to cut an RC0 tomorow ~ 1PM GMT-6

Cassandra and i have been hammering away at the ref guide to try and get it in shape for the 4.5 release. one key gap right now is that hte release *process* for the guide itself still needs updated to inlcude PGP signing & SHA1 checksums of the file -- so i'm going to work on that later to

Re: [JENKINS] Lucene-Solr-trunk-Windows (64bit/jdk1.7.0_40) - Build # 3290 - Still Failing!

Bah windows paths ... i'm on it. : Date: Tue, 24 Sep 2013 15:38:32 + (UTC) : From: Policeman Jenkins Server : Reply-To: dev@lucene.apache.org : To: dev@lucene.apache.org : Subject: [JENKINS] Lucene-Solr-trunk-Windows (64bit/jdk1.7.0_40) - Build # : 3290 - Still Failing! : : Build:

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 4.5.0 RC1

: : > http://people.apache.org/~jpountz/staging_area/lucene-solr-4.5.0-RC1-rev1524755/ Once i fixed the javadoc linter workarround to hte 4_5 branch, I found no other problems with RC1 other then LUCENE-5233 -- and i certainly don't think LUCENE-5233 is significant enough to warrant a re-spin.

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 4.5.0 RC1

: On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 9:20 AM, Adrien Grand wrote: : > I'll backport the commit to lucene_solr_4_5. : : Oh, I see you have already done that, thanks! yeah, sorry -- i ment to followup and forgot to hit send. -Hoss - To u

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 4.5.0 RC1

: > http://people.apache.org/~jpountz/staging_area/lucene-solr-4.5.0-RC1-rev1524755/ I'm seeing the same java6 javadoc validation error in smoke tester that jenkins was complaining about. sarowe pointed out that mccandless committed a workarround for this to the 4x branch, but that didn't get

need doc assist for 4.5: clarify SOLR-4221 changes regarding routeField vs router.field ?

Yonik / Noble / Shalin in particular: we need clarification here on these changes for 4.5... https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-4221?focusedCommentId=13769675&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#comment-13769675 Cassandra and i were talking on IRC thi

Re: [JENKINS] Lucene-Solr-Tests-4.x-Java6 - Build # 2004 - Failure

: java6 does not have assertionError with message. crap ... looks like i forgot to make sure i was using java6 when i compiled the 4x branch. sorry about that. -Hoss - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.or

Re: [JENKINS-MAVEN] Lucene-Solr-Maven-4.x #450: POMs out of sync

: Some background on the lucene-codec module's complex maven config : (lucene-core, solr-core, and solr-solrj all have the same setup): : - the two attached : images show the cyclic dependency situation involving the test-framework : modules

RE: SimplePostToolTest very slow

: the main problem with any security manager is: To check if a connection : is allowed, it has to resolve DNS and look the IP up in the policy. Can we update the secuity policy to fail fast anytime a DNS lookup happens? even if it happens implicitly in situations like this (URL.hashCode) so we

Re: SimplePostToolTest very slow

: If you want to experiment, a really trivial test is below -- on my system, : there is a ~5 second gap between each pair of "INIT" and "H1" timestamps, : but no other odd gaps in subsequent timestamps -- suggesting no caching of : DNS per hostname, but that the URL class doesn't "re-lookup" on

Re: SimplePostToolTest very slow

: I still don't see why you'd get different timings between Eclipse and : Ant if you're running with the same VM -- it should be pretty : consistent (either it caches dns lookups or it doesn't). Maybe Eclipse mucks with networkaddress.cache.ttl & networkaddress.cache.negative.ttl ? If you want

Re: SimplePostToolTest very slow

: and changing the SimplePostTool instances to static and switching the : @Before to @BeforeClass causes the whole tests runtime to drop down to 50 : seconds for me. i couldn't leave that change in because it introduced failures depending on test ordering (i thought those SimplePostTool object

Re: SimplePostToolTest very slow

: Am I the only one that experiences this slowness? I can reproduce the speeds you are seeing from ant (no IDE to test from on my end) It looks like some sort of delay in init ... every test has ~25s delay, and changing the SimplePostTool instances to static and switching the @Before to @Befo

RE: Lucene/Solr 4.5

: Guys, stop this endless and pointless thread. You're both right. You : should not have unstable code in a stable branch, that should be on : trunk. This said, you should not spring out RCs without warning. Some : stuff may actually be in trunk ready to be merged if you give a heads : up, or

Re: [jira] [Commented] (SOLR-4221) Custom sharding

: just grand me edit access Are you talking about edit access for the ref guide? there's a well documented process for that... https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/solr/Internal+-+Maintaining+Documentation#Internal-MaintainingDocumentation-WhoCanEditThisDocumentation https://cwiki.apache

Re: [jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-26) Wildcard query only accepts 1 or more characters for prefixes (not 0 or more)

FYI: commit->jira bot pattern matching glitch... https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-6745 : Date: Wed, 11 Sep 2013 14:01:52 + (UTC) : From: "ASF subversion and git services (JIRA)" : Reply-To: dev@lucene.apache.org : To: dev@lucene.apache.org : Subject: [jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-

Re: A reference to a commercial algorithm in comments - is this all right?

: Subject: A reference to a commercial algorithm in comments - is this all : right? I have no objections to the root of your concern: mentioning the commercial plugin, and how to activate it, in the solr config comments. In general though, i wonder if it would be simpler / more straight for

Re: svn commit: r1519516 - /lucene/board-reports/2013/board-report-september.txt

: Subject: svn commit: r1519516 - : /lucene/board-reports/2013/board-report-september.txt +1 -Hoss - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org

Re: [JENKINS] Lucene-Solr-Tests-4.x-Java7 - Build # 1506 - Failure

: [ecj-lint] * the index when collecting the {@see #getNumberCollected()} documents Bah ... Sorry, fix in progress. : On Aug 15, 2013, at 4:07 PM, Apache Jenkins Server wrote: : : > Build: https://builds.apache.org/job/Lucene-Solr-Tests-4.x-Java7/1506/ : > : > All tests passed : > : >

Re: [JENKINS] Lucene-Solr-NightlyTests-trunk - Build # 343 - Still Failing

I can reproduce this -- it's probably related to the MP randomization i put in ... looks like it's doing exact numeric comparisons based on term stats. I'll take a look later today... ant test -Dtestcase=SpellCheckCollatorTest -Dtests.method=testEstimatedHitCounts -Dtests.seed=16B4D8F74E59EE

Re: Interesting failure scenario, SolrCloud and ZK nodes on different times

: > When the times were coordinated, many of the problems with recovery went : > away. We're trying to reconstruct the scenario from memory, but it : > prompted me to pass the incident in case it sparked any thoughts. : > Specifically, I wonder if there's anything that comes to mind if the ZK : >

Re: [Solr Wiki] Update of "UsingMailingLists" by HossMan

: actually says "Welcome to the temporary SearchHub. To learn more about this : site, please click here" and has a bad image URL. : : In any case, the name/text is outdated. : : And, on the searchhub.org menu for "Reference Materials" it has "Solr : Reference Guide" with this link: yeah .. good

Re: [JENKINS] Lucene-Solr-4.x-Linux (32bit/jdk1.8.0-ea-b99) - Build # 6723 - Failure!

I'm actually looking into these TestJmxIntegration failures now in SOLR-5094 : Date: Tue, 30 Jul 2013 19:20:23 + (UTC) : From: Policeman Jenkins Server : To: dev@lucene.apache.org, hoss...@apache.org : Subject: [JENKINS] Lucene-Solr-4.x-Linux (32bit/jdk1.8.0-ea-b99) - Build # : 6723

RESULTS: VOTE: RC2 Release apache-solr-ref-guide-4.4.pdf

The VOTE has passed (5 +1, 0 +/-0, 0 -1) I'll begin the publish process. : Date: Thu, 25 Jul 2013 11:24:55 -0700 (MST) : From: Chris Hostetter : To: Lucene Dev : Subject: VOTE: RC2 Release apache-solr-ref-guide-4.4.pdf : : : Please VOTE to release the following PDF as apache-solr-ref-

Re: VOTE: RC2 Release apache-solr-ref-guide-4.4.pdf

: : Please VOTE to release the following PDF as apache-solr-ref-guide-4.4.pdf : : : : https://people.apache.org/~hossman/apache-solr-ref-guide-4.4_RC2.pdf For completeness, the RC2 artifact i'm voting +1 to is... 2973817acf6ea5e4b607e5eac2bd49d7857b5406 apache-solr-ref-guide-4.4_RC2.pdf check

Re: [CONF] Apache Solr Reference Guide > Internal - How To Publish This Documentation

: One question: should we also add signatures and checksums on the pdf : artifact? In my opinion we should create those so we can verify that we : all vote on the same pdf file created by the RM. The GPG signature would : ensure this. Good question. I briefly considered this a while back when

Re: VOTE: RC2 Release apache-solr-ref-guide-4.4.pdf

: Please VOTE to release the following PDF as apache-solr-ref-guide-4.4.pdf : : https://people.apache.org/~hossman/apache-solr-ref-guide-4.4_RC2.pdf +1 -Hoss - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For addi

VOTE: RC2 Release apache-solr-ref-guide-4.4.pdf

Please VOTE to release the following PDF as apache-solr-ref-guide-4.4.pdf https://people.apache.org/~hossman/apache-solr-ref-guide-4.4_RC2.pdf Changes since RC1... * Additional info from dsmiley on several pages related to spatial * Improvements in organization of "Upgrading" instuctions *

Re: VOTE: RC1 Release apache-solr-ref-guide-4.4.pdf

: Crap, I just noticed Hoss's : , which : is a shorter version of the 4.4 upgrade notes page I just created. : It feels weird to have upgrade notes for different versions in multiple : places - maybe the previous rele

Re: VOTE: RC1 Release apache-solr-ref-guide-4.4.pdf

: Please VOTE to release the following PDF as apache-solr-ref-guide-4.4.pdf : : https://people.apache.org/~hossman/apache-solr-ref-guide-4.4_RC1.pdf +1 -Hoss - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For addi

VOTE: RC1 Release apache-solr-ref-guide-4.4.pdf

Please VOTE to release the following PDF as apache-solr-ref-guide-4.4.pdf https://people.apache.org/~hossman/apache-solr-ref-guide-4.4_RC1.pdf As this is our first "Documentation release" VOTE, folks may wish to familiarize themselves with the doc release process that I posted a while back,

Re: DISCUSS: First official Solr documentation release, plan to vote on wed.

: don't have to write this idea another 6 times as I find these, one : possible solution that just occurred to me is to reduce the font size : of those examples - in the PDF they appear to be larger than the : regular text, so I think there's room for a point or two reduction. I : don't know if tha

Re: DISCUSS: First official Solr documentation release, plan to vote on wed.

: TL;DR: I plan to call a vote to formaly release this doc in ~40 hours. Please : help out by reviewing/improving the content -- especially if one of the It looks like all the new major additions are complete, I'll hold off on cutting hte RC for a couple more hours to give folks some more time

Re: DISCUSS: First official Solr documentation release, plan to vote on wed.

: Could I have write access to the pages, thought to start by fixing couple : typos. Or should I leave them as comments? Please leave comments on specific pages, or open Jira isues for larger concerns. The doc is only directly editable by committers in order to be able to be able to officially

Re: Solr Ref Guide caveat needs update

: “This Guide Covers The Unreleased Apache Solr 4.4.” ... : 4.4 is of course released now. The text was ment to refer to the fact that the *guide* is unreleased - I've tweaked it to be more clear in all cases. : Sounds like yet another step to add to the “ReleaseToDo” wiki. ...

DISCUSS: First official Solr documentation release, plan to vote on wed.

Now that the 4.4 release vote is official and gradually making it's way to the mirrors, I'd like to draw attention to the efforts that have been made to get the "Solr Reference Guide" into releasable shape, so that we can plan on holding a VOTE to release the "4.4" version ASAP... https://cw

Re: list-unsubscr...@apache.org

: Subject: list-unsubscr...@apache.org If anyone wihes to unsubscribe, you need to *send* an email to the unsubscribe address, not put it in the subject of a reply. the specifics of how to unsubscribe are listed in the footer of every email to the list(s) you are on... : > ---

Re: for those of you using gmail...

: And seems that it returns no result for query: : : from:jenk...@thetaphi.de subject:"build 6605" ANY_WORD_NOT_IN_TITLE : : Maybe for some mails, only title field are taken into consideration? Ah ... interesting. I wonder if maybe something about the content of the jenkins emails + the mu

Re: for those of you using gmail...

: Hmm I don't get this linke ("repeat search to include omitted search results"). I think he was just searching google.com, not searching his gmail folders -- that would exaplin the "repeat search ..." link and the results that are clearly from mail archives... : > general - [Bug 51530] New:

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >