@Karl, thx that you will release new plexus-java:0.9.8.
@Christian, yesterday I came late, but I concentrated on permanent issue on
Windows Jenkins nodes. The issues is that java compiles won't compile and I
guess it is again because on windows paths. The problem appears only on
windows-2012-3. I a
We have a problem [1] with old version of plexus-java:0.9.3 and ASM library.
We should use plexus-java:0.9.7 which is dependent on ASM 6.1.1.
This would fix our problem with Maven 3.5.3. But is it working solution for
older Maven versions too?
What would be a generic solution?
Would be Maven depen
Hi All,
Can we have JDK 11 in our Groovy script maven-jenkins-env.git ?
Not sure if our Jenkins already contains JDK 11.
Cheers
Tibor
+1
On Tue, Apr 24, 2018 at 5:58 PM, Hervé BOUTEMY
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We solved 10 issues:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?
> projectId=12317923&version=12342371&styleName=Text
>
> There are still a couple of issues left in JIRA:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql
Do you want to turn the JUnit annotation @Ignore to a failure in
plugin/build summary?
I think there is no such possibility.
On Mon, Apr 23, 2018 at 9:22 PM, Walton, Mark (CGI Federal) <
mark.wal...@cgifederal.com> wrote:
> Hi:
> Does anyone know how to configure SureFire so that skipped tests re
+1:
On Tue, Apr 17, 2018 at 12:37 AM, Hervé BOUTEMY
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We solved 3 issues:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?
> projectId=12317320&version=12342365&styleName=Text
>
> There are still a couple of issues left in JIRA:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jq
This is interesting discussion and so I decided to build your project with
Java 9 and Maven 3.5.3.
Completed within 1.5 sec.
I have noticed that Maven 3.3.9 was slower, cca 2.5 sec.
mvn -V test
Apache Maven 3.5.3 (3383c37e1f9e9b3bc3df5050c29c8aff9f295297;
2018-02-24T20:49:05+01:00)
Maven home: D:\
@Paul
I am not a Mac user. I only know from what the user has specified in the
Jira issue.
Feel free to participate in the Jira ticket.
On Fri, Apr 13, 2018 at 2:04 PM, Paul Hammant wrote:
> OS/X == OS X (former OS name) == macOS (current OS name) ?
>
> 10 == 10.10.x ?
>
--
Cheers
Tibor
Hi Olivier,
The Dockerfile is in the jira comment too. Only these two lines of code in
Dockerfile:
FROM maven:3.5.3-jdk-8-alpine
COPY ./. /
On Fri, Apr 13, 2018 at 2:13 PM, Olivier Lamy wrote:
> Hi
> Happy to help,
> But your comment says
>
> sudo docker build --no-cache -t mymvn:1 -f ./Dock
Hi All,
I want to ask you to help us with testing one issue which can be reproduced
only on OS/X 10.
I tried to run a small test on Ubuntu 17 x86_64 but I could not reproduce
an issue of surefire plugin.
Here is a comment in Jira issue. I described there steps I run Docker (CE
18.03) container wi
force=true
Was this configuration in plan?
Cheers
Tibor
On Mon, Apr 9, 2018 at 8:28 PM, Tibor Digana wrote:
> >> CI servers are known to run in batch mode
> Therefore I asked because I exactly need something like this: "mvn -B
> -Dstyle.color=always ..." in my company on
Why we do not use Version 1.1.0 of Settings XML?
The latest Maven dist has 1.0.0.
Do we have a reason to use older version 1.0.0?
There are some differences regarding repo layout and proxy default value.
Cheers
Tibor
+1 from me, the SHA1 matched
On Mon, Apr 9, 2018 at 9:21 PM, Karl Heinz Marbaise
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We solved 9 issues:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?proje
> ctId=12317224&version=12337984
>
>
> There are still a couple of issues left in JIRA:
> https://issues.apache.org
Hi all,
I want to use non-interactive mode, -B, together with JANSI colors.
Is it possible?
Why we bound JANSI to -B ?
Cheers
Tibor
+1
Cheers
Tibor
On Sat, Apr 7, 2018 at 9:32 AM, Karl Heinz Marbaise
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 07/04/18 06:44, Raphael Ackermann wrote:
>
>> The link with the solved issues leads to a page that requires you to be a
>> Jira user.
>>
>
> Try this one (thanks for the feedback):
>
> https://issues.apache.
+1; from me
sha1 matched 9098f4024981218d0c2c22b176f51b92850e3960
On Mon, Apr 2, 2018 at 8:17 PM, Karl Heinz Marbaise
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We solved 6 issues:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?proje
> ctId=12317227&version=12341595
>
> There are still a couple of issues left i
+1: from me
sha1: 40371b464195e84f0225f11c515ae7a21c393297 match, ok
On Mon, Apr 2, 2018 at 8:29 PM, Karl Heinz Marbaise
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We solved 10 issues:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?proje
> ctId=12317921&version=12341390
>
> There are still a couple of issues le
seems to fix
> > the problem. Thanks!
> >
> > Tibor: No, I didn't get previous email. The Maven lists are too spammy
> for
> > me to subscribe. That could be the reason. Please CC me if follow-up is
> > needed. Thanks.
> >
> >
> > On Sat, Mar
0[1]
>
> Robert
>
> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MJAVADOC-490
>
>
> On Wed, 04 Apr 2018 16:23:01 +0200, Tibor Digana
> wrote:
>
> Hi Robert,
>
> This issue is caused when I use maven-javadoc-plugin:3.0.0 with goal
> "aggregate".
> I coul
venProject.getArtifact().getFile() still points to the output
> directory instead of the jar.
>
> Robert
>
>
> On Tue, 27 Mar 2018 09:52:03 +0200, Tibor Digana
> wrote:
>
> There is a similar issue in our Jira
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MASSEMBLY-
On Wed, Mar 28, 2018 at 10:08 PM, Karl Heinz Marbaise
wrote:
> Hi Tibor,
>
> On 28/03/18 21:56, Tibor Digana wrote:
>
>> It cannot be dependency issue because as I said before, (mvn install)
>> works
>> fine.
>>
>
> Exactly that's t
Christopher,
Did you receive my previous answer?
There is some problem with email delivery.
Tibor
On Fri, Mar 30, 2018 at 8:58 PM, Christopher wrote:
> Found a bug in maven-failsafe-plugin (
> https://github.com/apache/accumulo/issues/411) when using groups (JUnit
> categories):
> http://maven.
It cannot be dependency issue because as I said before, (mvn install) works
fine.
Deploy is one phase after. We have site and release extra which breaks the
build.
On Wed, Mar 28, 2018 at 8:46 PM, Karl Heinz Marbaise
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 28/03/18 20:27, Tibor Digana wrote:
>
>>
when making your war/assembly?
> Looks like a ratrace to me.
>
> Robert
>
>
> On Wed, 28 Mar 2018 20:14:29 +0200, Tibor Digana
> wrote:
>
> I am not rewriting the POM Model. I am just a Maven user.
>> My project has WAR packaging.
>>
>> On Wed, Mar 28, 2018
on't like this, but that's how it works right now and rewriting it will
> have a huge impact.
> During jar:jar the jar should be attached to this artifact.
>
> thanks,
> Robert
>
> On Wed, 28 Mar 2018 08:08:48 +0200, Tibor Digana
> wrote:
>
> I have chec
o the output
> directory instead of the jar.
>
> Robert
>
>
> On Tue, 27 Mar 2018 09:52:03 +0200, Tibor Digana
> wrote:
>
> There is a similar issue in our Jira
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MASSEMBLY-411
>> Nobody has seen this? Any opinion
We can make a review of the branch "1506" of the issue [1]. There I am just
trying to find our what's wrong with JDK10 [2], [3]. There are few open
tickets [4].
[1]: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SUREFIRE-1506
[2]: https://builds.apache.org/job/maven-box/job/maven-surefire/job/1506/
[3]: h
There is a similar issue in our Jira
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MASSEMBLY-411
Nobody has seen this? Any opinion about this or workaround?
Everything would help!
On Mon, Mar 26, 2018 at 9:21 PM, Tibor Digana
wrote:
> I have a specific problem with Maven Assembly Plugin to run dur
I have a specific problem with Maven Assembly Plugin to run during (mvn
release:perform).
If I run the build (mvn install) the plugin works as expected.
I've got this error while cutting release:
Failed to execute goal
org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-assembly-plugin:3.1.0:single
(web-archive-h2-in
We are using JDK10 on ASF Jenkins and I see that every build fails with
"The system cannot find the path specified" on Windows
and some Linux build fails with " /bin/sh: 1:
/home/jenkins/tools/java/latest10/bin/java: not found ".
See my last comments in
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-
3-18 um 21:26 schrieb Tibor Digana:
>
>> I always do it with interactive 'git rebase' in IntelliJ IDEA.
>> If there is a merge conflict, the contributor creates a new PR which has
>> happened maybe only once.
>> The most of the time the repo could be successfully
pov wrote:
> Am 2018-03-18 um 20:28 schrieb Karl Heinz Marbaise:
>
>> Hi Tibor,
>>
>> On 18/03/18 19:50, Tibor Digana wrote:
>>
>>> Do you have permissions to close pull requests in our ASF Maven projects?
>>>
>>
>> Are you allowed to do merg
Do you have permissions to close pull requests in our ASF Maven projects?
Me either!
I would like to close completed PRs which leak in the list at GitHub and
the particular person does not respond to my request.
T
gt; On 18 March 2018 at 12:55, Tibor Digana wrote:
>
> > Hi Stephen,
> >
> > You probably mean -Djenkins.branch.WorkspaceLocatorImpl.PATH_MAX=50
> > Our INFRA set it to 50.
> > Can it be smaller as well?
> > The artifacts [1] says "The default value is 80
(2016).
[1]:
https://wiki.jenkins.io/display/JENKINS/Branch+API+Plugin
Cheers
Tibor
On Sun, Mar 18, 2018 at 1:48 PM, Stephen Connolly <
stephen.alan.conno...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sun 18 Mar 2018 at 12:13, Tibor Digana wrote:
>
> > The "maven-surefire" in
> >
owse/INFRA-16191.
I only guess it has to do with long paths or long commandline. The Infra
team says that they set long paths limit to 32K characters.
The root cause is still unknown!
Can you help investigating?
On Sun, Mar 18, 2018 at 12:55 PM, Tibor Digana
wrote:
> Hi Herve,
>
> I h
Hi Herve,
I have assigned your jira SUREFIRE-1504 to version 3.0.0-M1.
Are you fine with that?
Cheers
Tibor
On Sun, Mar 18, 2018 at 11:20 AM, Hervé BOUTEMY
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> As you may have noticed, the issue was filed a long time ago
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-15436
> and t
-8168275
Cheers
Tibor
On Sat, Mar 17, 2018 at 6:12 PM, Tibor Digana
wrote:
> Hi Jeff,
>
> I am not an expert for Windows internals. Here is the statement [1] given
> by our INFRA team. Do you think they performed same setting you have
> proposed?
> If it is different, you can m
y default, as long paths are not supported by Windows
> Explorer, cmd.exe and the Git for Windows tool chain (msys, bash, tcl,
> perl…). Only enable this if you know what you’re doing and are prepared to
> live with a few quirks.
>
> On Sat, Mar 17, 2018 at 11:12 AM, Tibor Digana
&
, 2018 at 11:12 AM, Enrico Olivelli
wrote:
> 2018-03-09 9:55 GMT+01:00 Tibor Digana :
>
> > Hi Enrico, Karl, Herve,
> >
> > We reported the issues [1] found during the Vote. They are fixed in
> > branches [2] and CI builds [3].
> > We can make a code review.
>
Is the consumer POM useful only for packaging=jar?
Because which other packagings use to have transitive dependencies as well?
On Sun, Mar 11, 2018 at 8:36 PM, Tibor Digana
wrote:
> Why the column with build POM in table does not have all items green +?
> Why there are two consumer POM&#
Why the column with build POM in table does not have all items green +?
Why there are two consumer POM's? Some is old proposal and second is yours?
Some consumer POMs may become BOM and there I would miss
dependencyManagement.
On Sun, Mar 11, 2018 at 6:03 PM, Hervé BOUTEMY
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I wro
Hi All,
The purpose of Version 3.0.0-M1 is a preliminary result of those issues
which are part of 3.0.0.
This includes Maven API 3.0.0 + Java 7 + bug fixing.
Maybe 10 issues in release 3.0.0-M1.
Regarding applied Maven API I have already started making an overview of
commits in the branch 3.0-rc1
+1
sha1 and md5 match
On Fri, Mar 9, 2018 at 9:47 PM, Karl Heinz Marbaise
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We solved 41 issues:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?proje
> ctId=12317422&version=12330696
>
> There are still a couple of issues left in JIRA:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/is
+1
SHA1 and MD5 match
On Wed, Mar 7, 2018 at 10:37 PM, Michael Osipov wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We solved 34 issues:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?proje
> ctId=12317522&version=12330788
>
> There are still a couple of issues left in JIRA:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues
-west.apache.org/repos/asf?p=maven-surefire.git;a=commit;h=6174be76f52ffc2873a18a5215f60767843d7479
https://builds.apache.org/job/maven-wip/job/maven-surefire/job/SUREFIRE-1490/2/
Cheers
Tibor
On Tue, Mar 6, 2018 at 5:33 PM, Tibor Digana wrote:
> Hello Gary, yes but my typo was corrected in the secon
I removed the old dist in second SVN commit. Would it be the case?
On Thu, Mar 8, 2018 at 7:31 PM, Karl Heinz Marbaise
wrote:
> Hi to all,
>
> our dist-tool[1] has failed base on the following:
>
> [INFO] maven-fluido-skin
> [INFO] /surefire: org.apache.maven.surefire
> [INFO] surefire
> [ER
Karl, am I doing something wrong?
I also checked sha1 and version.
On Thu, Mar 8, 2018 at 7:31 PM, Karl Heinz Marbaise
wrote:
> Hi to all,
>
> our dist-tool[1] has failed base on the following:
>
> [INFO] maven-fluido-skin
> [INFO] /surefire: org.apache.maven.surefire
> [INFO] surefire
> [ER
The Apache Maven team is pleased to announce the release of the Apache
Maven Surefire Plugin, version 2.21.0.
The release contains 33 bug fixes.
Again we received contributions from the community in form of bug reports
and bug fixes.
Thank you and keep them coming!
http://maven.apache.org/plugins
Hello Gary, yes but my typo was corrected in the second e-mail.
On Tue, Mar 6, 2018 at 5:16 PM, Gary Gregory wrote:
> This thread has the wrong VERSION in its subject.
>
> Gary
>
> On Sat, Mar 3, 2018 at 4:42 AM, Tibor Digana
> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
&
I will fix all mentioned issues above but this one. I only guess what has
happened. So I need to have a log from Herve to make sure my guess is right.
On Tue, Mar 6, 2018 at 3:38 PM, Eric Lilja wrote:
> On 2018-03-06 14:27, Tibor Digana wrote:
>
>>
>> Hi Herve,
>>>
&
Thx Robert for your voice in the release vote.
Cheers
Tibor
On Sun, Mar 4, 2018 at 3:47 PM, Robert Scholte wrote:
> +1
>
> On Sat, 03 Mar 2018 12:42:48 +0100, Tibor Digana
> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>>
>> We solved 33 issues:
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/s
Thx to everybody!
On Tue, Mar 6, 2018 at 2:27 PM, Tibor Digana wrote:
> +1
>
> On Tue, Mar 6, 2018 at 10:26 AM, Tibor Digana
> wrote:
>
>> Hi Herve,
>>
>> Can you send me a zip of the test which failed
>> *surefire-its/target/Surefire1177TestngParall
Hi,
The vote has passed with the following result:
+1 : Stephane Nicoll, Robert Scholte, Karl Heinz Marbaise, Olivier Lamy,
Enrico Olivelli, Hervé BOUTEMY, Tibor Digana
0 : none
-1 : none.
PMC quorum: accomplished.
I will promote the artifacts to the central repository.
Cheers
Tibor
+1
On Tue, Mar 6, 2018 at 10:26 AM, Tibor Digana
wrote:
> Hi Herve,
>
> Can you send me a zip of the test which failed
> *surefire-its/target/Surefire1177TestngParallelSuitesIT_shouldRunTwoSuitesInParallel*
> ?
> It is a parallelism in TestNG. I will discuss it with the guys i
> shouldRunTwoSuitesInParallel(org.apache.maven.surefire.its.jiras.
> Surefire1177TestngParallelSuitesIT):
> log pattern does not match nTimes(..)
>
> Unicode tests si already known, and I don't know for the second issue
>
> I don't see this as a blocker
>
> +1
>
> Regards,
>
version 2.20.1
To: Maven Developers List , Tibor Digana <
tibordig...@apache.org>
Hi,
The only issue I have found is that the following test:
checkFileNamesWithUnicode(org.apache.maven.surefire.its.UnicodeTestNamesIT):
Did not find expected message in log
seemed to be failing on my Mac o
lient.java:176)
> at
> org.apache.maven.plugin.surefire.booterclient.output.
> ThreadedStreamConsumer$Pumper.run(ThreadedStreamConsumer.java:88)
> at java.base/java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:844)
> Il sab 3 mar 2018, 13:34 Tibor Digana ha scritto:
>
> > Maybe disappoin
There were several reasons.
Maven plugins failed with J9, JUnit 5 Provider in future Surefire requires
J8, and the last is the JavaDoc check which runs within JavaC and it forced
the contributors to write JavaDoc correctly in the beginning of development.
T
On Sat, Mar 3, 2018 at 12:48 PM, Tibor Dig
Regarding the "dummy" artifact, we do not have to do anything in here and
not to report a bug because the next release together with new API 3.0
naturally removes this hack.
Thx
On Fri, Mar 2, 2018 at 3:09 PM, Alex O'Ree wrote:
> I was about to post the stack trace when i more carefully read the
us on a new release rather than new issues?
>
>
>
>
> On 1 March 2018 at 14:20, Tibor Digana wrote:
>
> > There is a branch SUREFIRE-1491 waiting for pushing to master. It is open
> > for everybody who want to check it:
> > https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=
> nit: is The subject of the vote thread wrong ?
>
> Enrico
>
>
> 2018-03-03 12:44 GMT+01:00 Tibor Digana :
>
>> The e-mail went out. The vote has started.
>> Should I mention how to run the build with other JDK and follow the
>> README.md on GitHub?
>>
&
+1 from me.
I did not find any issue.
On Sat, Feb 24, 2018 at 11:00 PM, Stephen Connolly <
stephen.alan.conno...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We solved 22 issues:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?
> version=12341428&styleName=Text&projectId=12316922
>
> There are 381 issues
Typo, the version is 2.21.0 of course.
On Sat, Mar 3, 2018 at 12:42 PM, Tibor Digana
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We solved 33 issues:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?
> projectId=12317927&version=12341630
>
> There are still a couple of iss
The e-mail went out. The vote has started.
Should I mention how to run the build with other JDK and follow the
README.md on GitHub?
On Fri, Mar 2, 2018 at 8:16 PM, Enrico Olivelli wrote:
> Il ven 2 mar 2018, 19:43 Tibor Digana ha scritto:
>
> > I will close the Jira Version and I w
Hi,
We solved 33 issues:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12317927&version=12341630
There are still a couple of issues left in JIRA:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/i#issues/?jql=project+%3D+SUREFIRE+AND+status+%3D+Open+ORDER+BY+priority+DESC
Staging repo:
https://
ha scritto:
>
> > Ok Sounds good.
> > But could we just focus on a new release rather than new issues?
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On 1 March 2018 at 14:20, Tibor Digana wrote:
> >
> > > There is a branch SUREFIRE-1491 waiting for pushing to ma
/job/SUREFIRE-1491/
Cheers
Tibor
On Thu, Mar 1, 2018 at 4:24 AM, Olivier Lamy wrote:
> Hi
> Inline
>
> On 1 March 2018 at 12:55, Tibor Digana wrote:
>
> > Hi Olivier,
> >
> > Please do not make it yet - I am in progress with fixing.
> > I am still runnin
Hi Olivier,
Please do not make it yet - I am in progress with fixing.
I am still running several branches on Jenkins. The Jira issues in 2.21.0
match branch name, as for instance today's SUREFIRE-1491.
After 1491 the next ones will be cosmetic changes - quite fast to do.
I would like to start the
> reported during last days and fix the Jenkins pipeline
>
> hope that helps
>
> Enrico
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> 2018-02-25 23:25 GMT+01:00 Enrico Olivelli :
>
> >
> >
> > Il dom 25 feb 2018, 21:45 Tibor Digana ha
> > scr
Hi All,
I have created a branch which adds switch-case for JDK 1.6 (latest) in
Groovy library jenkinsEnv.
Can I push it to master?
Cheers
Tibor
command is not clear, do not hesitate to ask beforehand.)
Thx
Tibor
On Sun, Feb 25, 2018 at 9:34 PM, Tibor Digana
wrote:
> Hey guys,
>
> We really do not properly read the e-mails.
> All the links you sent me was from master branch.
>
> We are NOT working in master branch. Do n
g.NoClassDefFoundError: org/apache/commons/lang3/SystemUtils
>> Caused by: java.lang.ClassNotFoundException: org.apache.commons.lang3.
>> JavaVersion
>>
>> I've removed my local repository, same result.
>>
>> Robert
>>
>> On Sun, 25 Feb 2018 04:04:02 +0100,
I am overriding the branch, so it is better to clone it fresh.
Please let me know if it is fine on your side.
With Best Regards,
Tibor
On Sun, Feb 25, 2018 at 2:51 AM, Tibor Digana
wrote:
> Try to delete local maven repository on Travis and run the branch
> SUREFIRE-1489 with --no-snaps
Try to delete local maven repository on Travis and run the branch
SUREFIRE-1489 with --no-snapshot-updates.
I hope we will have good results.
Good night!
On Sun, Feb 25, 2018 at 2:34 AM, Tibor Digana
wrote:
> What branch is for the build /maven-surefire-fs?
> Any special build configurat
my/maven-surefire/builds/345611495
>
> There are all Jenkins or Travis builds with an empty maven repo.
>
>
>
> On 25 February 2018 at 11:11, Tibor Digana wrote:
>
> > Hi Olivier,
> >
> > I am trying to be friendly and helpful.
> >
> > Maybe a hint
-1489/
Cheers
Tibor
On Sun, Feb 25, 2018 at 2:11 AM, Tibor Digana
wrote:
> Hi Olivier,
>
> I am trying to be friendly and helpful.
>
> Maybe a hint:
> One problem I found weeks ago was in Maven Central which contained a
> SNAPSHOT version built with Java 1.7.
> I had to d
r Robert can build it!!
> We must first fix that!!!
>
>
> On 25 February 2018 at 09:17, Tibor Digana wrote:
>
>> Sorry, I have to repeat myself because of undelivered message(s) to Maven
>> mailing list.
>>
>> For clarifying the Surefire goes with Java 6. If y
Sorry, I have to repeat myself because of undelivered message(s) to Maven
mailing list.
For clarifying the Surefire goes with Java 6. If you want to run your tests
with JDK10 or lower you have to specify the system property
-Djdk.home=/path/to/jdk10 and the you will see that the tests pass. Go to
I guess there would be many lines with InterruptedException, but unless we
download log file we would not be sure.
How to download it other way than through the HTTP link /console ?
On Sat, Feb 24, 2018 at 10:48 AM, Tibor Digana
wrote:
> Hello Stephen,
>
> I disabled the Jenkins ag
Hello Stephen,
I disabled the Jenkins agent using your hint [1].
I used zip() and archived build reports and logs of all ITs.
I used lock() on short running failsafe ITs.
Now the build is successful.
After this another bad thing happened.
The logs size was 27GB several hours ago. Now Jenkins doe
Hi Michael,
I found in C libraries documentation that PPID is =1 if the parent process
has exited - called native exit().
Would the child process see PPID=1 in other cases too, like parent abort()
or segmentation fault? Can I rely on this on all platforms?
It might be easy detection of parent proc
Hi Olivier,
I am traveling home. I will be available soon. ;-)
On Mon, Feb 19, 2018 at 12:42 AM, Olivier Lamy wrote:
> On 19 February 2018 at 09:20, Tibor Digana wrote:
>
> > I am using the lock() in my company. The helper-plugin finds a port but
> two
> > jobs on one mach
ait very
> long to get feedback. Maybe reducing the number of maven version tested?
>
> On 19 February 2018 at 00:22, Tibor Digana wrote:
>
> > No reason.
> > One job always took 1 hour. You do not have to.
> > We are working on a release. If you commit anything to maste
Regarding the unstable integration test,
Surefire1295AttributeJvmCrashesToTestsIT, I opened a discussion:
https://github.com/michaeltandy/crashjvm/issues/1
Not related to Java 9/10. It was unstable test before as well.
On Sun, Feb 18, 2018 at 4:39 PM, Tibor Digana
wrote:
> Can you tell me
@ Jenkins (and
> maybe try pinging Cyrille on Twitter)
>
> On Sun 18 Feb 2018 at 16:16, Tibor Digana wrote:
>
> > Please check logs of build process.
> > I have got BUILD SUCCESS of Maven run but the function *withMaven()*
> fails
> > right after the Mave
Please check logs of build process.
I have got BUILD SUCCESS of Maven run but the function *withMaven()* fails
right after the Maven process has finished. I have no idea why.
Because of this call in the stacktrace
*WithMavenStepExecution$WorkspaceCleanupCallback.finished*
I guess the function *w
66)
>
> at java.base/java.lang.ClassLoader.loadClass(ClassLoader.java:499)
>
> at
> org.apache.maven.surefire.shadefire.booter.IsolatedClassLoader.loadClass(
> IsolatedClassLoader.java:97)
>
>
>
>
> On 18 February 2018 at 13:44, Tibor Digana wrote:
>
> > The Jenkins CI was shutdown for several hours. So the
I forgot to say that those 4 ITs in m-failsafe-p take 30 seconds only, so
no big resource exh. And using timeout would prevent from long waiting.
On Sun, Feb 18, 2018 at 3:22 PM, Tibor Digana
wrote:
> No reason.
> One job always took 1 hour. You do not have to.
> We are working on a re
Marbaise
wrote:
> Hi Tibor,
>
> On 18/02/18 15:13, Tibor Digana wrote:
>
>> no, no
>> Please do not do it!
>>
>
> I would have at least waited for a feedback before I kill a Job ;-)...
>
>
> We are waiting for them.
>> They are expected to run 12
no, no
Please do not do it!
We are waiting for them.
They are expected to run 12 hours.
You can compute it:
1 hour each run configuration.
Number of configuration is 3 Maven config * 4 JDKs.
I tried to run them in parallel but they appeared several in one executor.
Maybe later as parallel but now
case.
Can you post outcome of "java -version"?
surefire-booter-2.21.0.jar
maven-surefire-common-2.21.0.jar
maven-failsafe-plugin-2.21.0.jar
: CA FE BA BE 00 00 00 *32*|02 76 01 00 44 6F 72 67 | Ęţşľ 2 v
Dorg
On Sun, Feb 18, 2018 at 1:52 PM, Tibor Digana
wrote:
>
changed all of them:
maven-surefire-plugin
2.21.0
1
true
5
false
On Sun, Feb 18, 2018 at 1:46 PM, Tibor Digana
wrote:
> commons-lang3:3.7 is used in internal tests only, because some tests are
> only related to Java 9+, but it has
> at java.base/java.lang.ClassLoader.loadClass(ClassLoader.java:566)
> >
> > at java.base/java.lang.ClassLoader.loadClass(ClassLoader.java:499)
> >
> > at org.apache.maven.surefire.shadefire.booter.
> > IsolatedClassLoader.loadClass(IsolatedClassLoader.java:
t;
> at java.base/java.lang.ClassLoader.loadClass(ClassLoader.java:566)
>
> at java.base/java.lang.ClassLoader.loadClass(ClassLoader.java:499)
>
> at
> org.apache.maven.surefire.shadefire.booter.IsolatedClassLoader.loadClass(
> IsolatedClassLoader.java:97)
>
>
>
>
&
The Jenkins CI was shutdown for several hours. So the HEAD was not taken.
I can trigger the build manually.
Cheers
Tibor
On Sun, Feb 18, 2018 at 4:39 AM, Tibor Digana
wrote:
> I will explain again everything.
> Do not worry, please.
>
> The build won't fail if you use -Djdk.
I will explain again everything.
Do not worry, please.
The build won't fail if you use -Djdk.home=/path/to/jdk. We don't have to
force the users to change JDK if they are fine with 1.6.
The library commons-lang3:3.7 was especially needed during our testing but
not in the main code, therefore Java
The distribution [1] of Surefire 2.21.0 is available in our Staging server.
I am currently building the site with test reports...
[1]: https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/maven-1396/
Cheers
Tibor
On Sun, Feb 18, 2018 at 4:03 AM, Tibor Digana
wrote:
> Hi Olivier,
>
&g
Hi Olivier,
Please make additional testing on Monday.
If you find an urgent bug we can always restart the Vote.
I hope it will be just fine and we will finish our release before the Java
10 release.
Cheers
Tibor
On Sun, Feb 18, 2018 at 1:25 AM, Tibor Digana
wrote:
> Olivier, your ja
at 1:05 PM, Tibor Digana
wrote:
> Ok, we can make additional testing by then.
> I have another question to our shared Groovy library [1]. I am missing
> configuration with Maven 3.1.x. Is there any problem with this version why
> we did not add it? Our Surefire build works fine with M
601 - 700 of 1362 matches
Mail list logo
