Github user Tibor17 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/maven-surefire/pull/107#issuecomment-161556711
@juherr I guess nobody is using buggy library 5.14.1 or 5.14.2. Since we
did rely on separator "," the users were facing this issue and most prob
Github user Tibor17 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/maven-surefire/pull/107#issuecomment-16178
@juherr What about to replace `","` with `", "` in surefire parameter value
in TestNG provider.
Do you think this would come over the
Github user Tibor17 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/maven-surefire/pull/108#issuecomment-161337141
Try to build IT with your code with more realistic counts, but the
fail-fast feature would not be coherent due to concurrency problem across forks.
---
If your
Github user Tibor17 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/maven-surefire/pull/107#issuecomment-161430409
@juherr
IIUC testng 5.14.1 - 5.14.3 are buggy and can be excluded from the test set.
What exactly the bug is? You mean the ClassLoader issue? What did
Github user Tibor17 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/maven-surefire/pull/108#issuecomment-161285312
@seanf Can you edd integration test?
You can add new test method to an existing IT.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email
Github user Tibor17 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/maven-surefire/pull/107#issuecomment-160475738
@juherr
Excellent!
Do you need any help from my side?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear
Github user Tibor17 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/maven-surefire/pull/107#issuecomment-160478603
Let me see tomorrow or on Tuesday.
You did a lot today :+1: but It's time to sleep.
Good progress. Thx.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can
Github user Tibor17 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/maven-surefire/pull/107#issuecomment-160393834
Your IT has this POM
https://github.com/apache/maven-surefire/blob/master/surefire-integration-tests/src/test/resources/testng-listener-reporter/pom.xml
Github user Tibor17 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/maven-surefire/pull/107#issuecomment-160397879
It's hard to debug the IT because @After cleaned up previous tests in
`target`.
Good inspiration is `Surefire1158RemoveInfoLinesIT` and method `unpack
Github user Tibor17 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/maven-surefire/pull/107#issuecomment-160416265
@juherr Please mention the configuration of reported in surefire
documentation.
I guess the returned value from `convertReporterConfig()` method should
Github user Tibor17 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/maven-surefire/pull/107#issuecomment-160430883
We can add system-dependency to the pom.xml of IT and add guice-2.0.jar on
the same level with pom.xml of the IT in the file system. You can extract
Github user Tibor17 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/maven-surefire/pull/107#issuecomment-160335576
No worries. :-)
I am glad that you continue with this issue. Btw I finished previous fix in
surefire and I am trying to dig into this issue
Github user Tibor17 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/maven-surefire/pull/107#issuecomment-160173397
Alright I go it. You must use profile instead:
`.addGoal( "-P testng6" )` and the profile `testng6` should have
dependencies with
Github user Tibor17 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/maven-surefire/pull/107#issuecomment-160195132
@juherr Try to commit what you have and I will check it out. Overriding
last commit is just fine.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply
Github user Tibor17 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/maven-surefire/pull/107#issuecomment-160193148
6.9.9 works in my dummy project, then yes. Latest greatest.
Feel free to override the last commit.
On Fri, Nov 27, 2015 at 8:10 PM, Julien Herr
Github user Tibor17 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/maven-surefire/pull/107#issuecomment-159998029
You can override the TestNG version by `resetInitialGoals( version )`
method and you can see the usage of the method in `CheckTestNgVersionsIT`. The
version
Github user Tibor17 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/maven-surefire/pull/107#issuecomment-159816428
@juherr Can you add an integration test. I guess there is another API for
reporter so that maybe we are missing one of them in our integration tests
(testng 6.0
Github user Tibor17 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/maven-surefire/pull/107#issuecomment-158758087
@juherr the build is successful, I will check the changes.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear
Github user Tibor17 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/maven/pull/72#issuecomment-158668300
Nowadays execution time of array allocation is logarithmic
function(array.length).
One way or another since of Java 6 the the objects are allocated in the
stack
Github user Tibor17 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/maven-surefire/pull/107#issuecomment-158545841
@juherr
I will run the build and i will check the code. Thx for the effort.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
Github user Tibor17 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/maven-surefire/pull/105#issuecomment-147730852
@juherr Thx I will include it.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user Tibor17 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/maven-surefire/pull/103#issuecomment-145664550
This feature has limitations own limitations, see the page after successful
release
https://maven.apache.org/surefire/maven-surefire-plugin/examples/skip
Github user Tibor17 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/maven-surefire/pull/103#issuecomment-145510139
I will start the release maybe today or tomorrow. All depends on my spare
time.
On Mon, Oct 5, 2015 at 1:54 PM, Benjamin Winterberg <
notific
Github user Tibor17 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/maven-surefire/pull/103#issuecomment-145497939
It will.
On Mon, Oct 5, 2015 at 12:43 PM, Benjamin Winterberg <
notificati...@github.com> wrote:
> Will skipAfterFailureC
Github user Tibor17 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/maven-surefire/pull/103#issuecomment-145532182
Benjamin, do you expect slight changes, let me know.
Can you please declare Failsafe Version 2.19-SNAPSHOT and run your tests.
Let me know your impression
Github user Tibor17 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/maven-surefire/pull/103#issuecomment-145563402
Usually it works for me. I am not behind proxy and use default settings.xml.
On Mon, Oct 5, 2015 at 4:38 PM, Benjamin Winterberg <
notific
Github user Tibor17 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/maven-surefire/pull/103#issuecomment-145584123
If it still does not help try with this URL
https://repository.apache.org/content/groups/snapshots
On Mon, Oct 5, 2015 at 4:38 PM, Benjamin
Github user Tibor17 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/maven-surefire/pull/103#issuecomment-145583437
Maybe this helps
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/7713996/is-there-a-way-to-make-maven-download-snapshot-versions-automatically
On Mon, Oct 5
Github user Tibor17 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/maven-surefire/pull/96#issuecomment-143955811
@agudian I would like to include you into our discussion.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub
Github user Tibor17 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/maven-surefire/pull/102#issuecomment-143954421
We can try with junit4 of course.
On Tue, Sep 29, 2015 at 12:59 AM, lamyaa <notificati...@github.com> wrote:
> @Tibor17 <https:
Github user Tibor17 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/maven-surefire/pull/105#issuecomment-14404
@juherr
Can you open issue in TestNG and discussion with @cbeust, add a link in
surefire comment in our code describing why we have such branching. That's
Github user Tibor17 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/maven-surefire/pull/105#issuecomment-144006895
@juherr
Regarding
https://github.com/juherr/maven-surefire/commit/5ac824733ea4b8201e8acd5c1d6cead0301340ab
why the parameters are not taking any effect
Github user Tibor17 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/maven-surefire/pull/105#issuecomment-144004816
@juherr LGTM. I would include this in 2.19.
Should we postpone suite thread count in the future release?
Do we need this change
https://github.com/juherr
Github user Tibor17 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/maven-surefire/pull/105#issuecomment-144005702
@juherr Can you please add the configuration detail in this use case in the
documentation [1] on the line 173 ?
I guess all people would be thankful.
[1
Github user Tibor17 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/maven-surefire/pull/105#issuecomment-144096998
@juherr I mean the configuration of plugin to be added in the documentation
[1] on the line 173 ?
[1] maven-surefire-plugin/src/site/apt/examples
Github user Tibor17 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/maven-surefire/pull/105#issuecomment-144211832
I made the required changes and going to push it to master.
I have to postpone the release because I found that parameter [1]
interrupted the build
Github user Tibor17 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/maven-surefire/pull/105#issuecomment-144214974
Thx for contributing. This PR was updated and merged with master. Feel free
to close it.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email
Github user Tibor17 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/maven-surefire/pull/106#issuecomment-143760174
Is there the same principle with thread count for suites?
I did not test suite thread count because I do not have IT.
Can you try?
On Mon, Sep 28
Github user Tibor17 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/maven-surefire/pull/106#issuecomment-143766756
Because we were always dependent on 5.7 and the users may still rely on it.
It is question of one minute to crate Utility class in the module
surefire-testng
Github user Tibor17 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/maven-surefire/pull/106#issuecomment-143790836
Alright create `TestNG510Configurator` and register it in
`AbstractSurefireMojo` and increate the version in surefire-testng POM.
---
If your project is set up
Github user Tibor17 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/maven-surefire/pull/106#issuecomment-143791336
The style with reflection is usually in junit provider, but you'r right,
forget reflection in testng.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply
Github user Tibor17 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/maven-surefire/pull/106#issuecomment-143758786
All you need to do is to call this method with Java Reflection.
There is `surefire-testng-util` module.
You should create reflection utility
Github user Tibor17 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/maven-surefire/pull/106#issuecomment-143793736
There is already version range [5.3,6.4] you should split which means to
split in
[5.3,5.10) and
[5.10,6.4] update only `TestNGMapConfigurator`.
Do
Github user Tibor17 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/maven-surefire/pull/106#issuecomment-143683397
Since 5.10?
Hm, I was testing with 6.9.x and the number of threads was 10 instead of 30
configured in `dataproviderthreadCount`.
Pending question - we
Github user Tibor17 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/maven-surefire/pull/98#issuecomment-143544670
@lamyaa
I applied the local change and executed XmlReporterRunTimeIT.
The balancer is really applied and Test1 was really executed within 600
millis
Github user Tibor17 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/maven-surefire/pull/98#issuecomment-143595094
@lamyaa
Can I finish it unless you you are already in progress?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear
Github user Tibor17 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/maven-surefire/pull/105#issuecomment-143595965
This issue is not in the list of release Version 2.19.
Would you have the spare time to complete till Tuesday afternoon CET?
Can I start the release Vote
Github user Tibor17 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/maven-surefire/pull/74#issuecomment-143642564
Hello guys, I have implemented new streamer of classes.
The problem was with old streamer which was able to dispatch test class
name to the forked JVM
Github user Tibor17 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/maven-surefire/pull/98#issuecomment-143606448
@lamyaa
Pls close this pull-request. I have pushed the fix including your IT.
Thx for the IT, it was very nice work.
---
If your project is set up
Github user Tibor17 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/maven-surefire/pull/106#issuecomment-143505456
@juherr
This is the IT, but the problem is in TestNG because the concurrency
remains 10 even if dataproviderthreadcount=30.
Meanwhile I reported issue
GitHub user Tibor17 opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/maven-surefire/pull/106
[SUREFIRE-1179] integration test
for #105
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/Tibor17/maven-surefire s4
Alternatively you
Github user Tibor17 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/maven-surefire/pull/105#issuecomment-142898887
@juherr
That's pity. I will postpone the release in a week. Maybe I could help you
to write the IT in multiple commits.
---
If your project is set up
Github user Tibor17 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/maven-surefire/pull/105#issuecomment-142905726
@juherr I have to wait for #98 anyway which is critical bug and the guys in
Maven expect the fix. So we may take this commit as it is, that's fine, and
prove
Github user Tibor17 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/maven-surefire/pull/2#issuecomment-142837160
Enabled by default would mean to introduce a new feature and new bugs and
requirements in Jira.
The reason why we want the users to implement the API
Github user Tibor17 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/maven-surefire/pull/105#issuecomment-142740267
@juherr
Please consider these integration tests as a hint.
These are typical tests using `parallel` parameter.
`CheckTestNgGroupThreadParallelIT
Github user Tibor17 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/maven-surefire/pull/102#issuecomment-142747818
Hi @lamyaa
What should we do with this PR?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well
Github user Tibor17 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/maven-surefire/pull/96#issuecomment-142758232
@lamyaa
Did you have time to run this test using the fix we talked about in
`SUREFIRE-1144`?
Is the execution time calculation broken
Github user Tibor17 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/maven-surefire/pull/2#issuecomment-142749714
@kpiwko
@gastaldi
@marcusholl
What can we do about this old issue?
My suggestion is to propose SPI in Surefire 3.x where hacking system
Github user Tibor17 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/maven-surefire/pull/105#issuecomment-141812040
Agreed, we can improve later on.
Then the TestNG project should be informed that we continue using old
configuration method.
I have to ask you
Github user Tibor17 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/maven-surefire/pull/105#issuecomment-141693490
Well regarding deadline of 2.19 is as I said EO September, and 2.20 is
unknown but I want to have it till the EO 2015.
You know what would be great is to use
Github user Tibor17 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/maven-surefire/pull/105#issuecomment-141484326
LGTM but missing ITs.
You can use the one in Jira and create new for testsuites. See how the ITs
are written in surefire-integration-tests module. I guess
Github user Tibor17 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/maven-surefire/pull/105#issuecomment-141484970
If you have exps with overriding git commit, feel free to override it
adding the ITs and we will have single commit or squash the commits.
---
If your project
Github user Tibor17 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/maven-surefire/pull/98#issuecomment-141173488
@lamyaa
I will have a look into this test.
On Thu, Sep 17, 2015 at 7:19 PM, lamyaa <notificati...@github.com> wrote:
> @Tibor
GitHub user Tibor17 opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/maven-surefire/pull/104
[SUREFIRE-524] Forked Process not terminated if maven process aborted.
Provide means to clean up.
Fix for https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SUREFIRE-524
You can merge this pull
Github user Tibor17 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/maven-surefire/pull/98#issuecomment-140308340
Yes a new pull request would be great. I have made a lot of rework in
surefire. Most probably this branch is not able to merge.
On 9/14/15, lamyaa
Github user Tibor17 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/maven-surefire/pull/98#issuecomment-139858232
@lamyaa
I think I found a solution which works on my side with non-parallel tests.
Feel free to tell me what you think about my hypothesis.
Can you
Github user Tibor17 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/maven-surefire/pull/98#issuecomment-139915061
IMHO all we need to do is to change the last parameter:
`createTestSuiteElement( ppw, testSetReportEntry, testSetStats,
reportNameSuffix
Github user Tibor17 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/maven-surefire/pull/98#issuecomment-138134180
@lamyaa
Sorry for waiting so long time. I have finished issue 580.
I will have a look on this since now.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can
Github user Tibor17 closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/maven-surefire/pull/103
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so
Github user Tibor17 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/maven-surefire/pull/103#issuecomment-138125021
This PR has been merged with master.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user Tibor17 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/maven-surefire/pull/102#issuecomment-136962698
Pls import code style to your IDE.
https://maven.apache.org/developers/conventions/code.html#IntelliJ_IDEA_4.5
For instance in IntelliJ IDEA you import
Github user Tibor17 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/maven-surefire/pull/102#issuecomment-136964837
Why you have `rerunAtEnd( reporterFactory, result.getFailures() );
` after `runNotifier.fireTestRunFinished( result );`?
I am not sure if test report
GitHub user Tibor17 opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/maven-surefire/pull/103
[SUREFIRE-580] Allow "fail fast" or stop running on first failure
Solution for https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SUREFIRE-580
Refactoring
and InputStream in forked jvm
Github user Tibor17 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/maven-surefire/pull/102#issuecomment-137228645
The junit47 provider runs all reruns in the after phase. If you use this
provider, would it help the users? We should mention few differences between
providers
Github user Tibor17 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/maven-surefire/pull/99#issuecomment-134512694
This was merged with master. I am wondering why GitHub did not close this
PR.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
Github user Tibor17 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/maven-surefire/pull/99#issuecomment-134726299
@lamyaa
Pls close this pr. Thx
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user Tibor17 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/maven-surefire/pull/99#issuecomment-134410478
LGTM
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user Tibor17 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/maven-surefire/pull/101#issuecomment-133910961
The /components/ URL must not be visible to our users because it's an
internal URL. The non-components page must be used.
Notice: content is in fact
Github user Tibor17 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/maven-surefire/pull/99#issuecomment-133976477
The build does not pass because the file `surefire-test-report.xsd` is
missing the license.
Feel free to use the license from whatever POM.xml as a XML
Github user Tibor17 closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/maven-surefire/pull/97
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so
Github user Tibor17 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/maven/pull/53#issuecomment-113717735
try-with-resources is cool.
+1
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does
GitHub user Tibor17 opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/maven-surefire/pull/97
[SUREFIRE-1067] Nested causes conflated with wrapper exception
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/Tibor17/maven-surefire s2
Github user Tibor17 closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/maven-shared/pull/9
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature
GitHub user Tibor17 opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/maven-shared/pull/9
Verifier should not use hard coded CLI options without modifying them
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/Tibor17/maven-shared
GitHub user Tibor17 opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/maven-surefire/pull/95
[SUREFIRE-1158] Remove console println of TestNG configurator
Some refactoring and implementation for this issue.
These lines are printed with debug (mvn -X) or show-errors (mvn -e
Github user Tibor17 closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/maven-surefire/pull/94
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so
GitHub user Tibor17 opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/maven-surefire/pull/94
[SUREFIRE-1153] Take includes into account when using test/it.test property
As discussed we Andreas we agreed on SUREFIRE-1153 acceptance where the
includes/excludes list is ignored as soon
GitHub user Tibor17 opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/maven-surefire/pull/92
[SUREFIRE-1017] Failures do not show test-package since 2.13
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SUREFIRE-1017
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git
Github user Tibor17 closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/maven-surefire/pull/91
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so
GitHub user Tibor17 opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/maven-surefire/pull/91
[SUREFIRE] Refactoring
+ Java 5 for-each instead of Iterator
+ optimized loops
+ optimized branching
+ optimized use of this pointer
+ using Java Generics instead
Github user Tibor17 closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/maven-surefire/pull/87
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so
GitHub user Tibor17 opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/maven-surefire/pull/87
[SUREFIRE-1024] verify goal ignores dependenciesToScan parameter when
checking tests existence
The problem of SUREFIRE-1024 was with failsafe plugin which however
executed integration-test
GitHub user Tibor17 opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/maven-surefire/pull/83
[SUREFIRE] Run individual methods with junit48
PR #75.
Still in progress.
Created TestListResolver with unit tests and IT.
TODO: fix the build, renew IT tests which were
in ThreadLocal copy for certainly
small thread pool.
I didn't measure the time spent on flushing ByteBuffer with 256KB byte
array, might be interesting too.
-
BR, tibor17
--
View this message in context:
http://maven.40175.n5.nabble.com/Preview-release-Plexus-Archiver-multithreaded-Zip
with Java Threads - it's still the same
Thread as it was before with more fancy join-functionality for us developers
- nothing special - no direct selection of processor in Java code.
-
BR, tibor17
--
View this message in context:
http://maven.40175.n5.nabble.com/Preview-release-Plexus-Archiver
should
have DMA access to that memory this way.
-
BR, tibor17
--
View this message in context:
http://maven.40175.n5.nabble.com/Preview-release-Plexus-Archiver-multithreaded-Zip-edition-tp5822942p5823268.html
Sent from the Maven Developers mailing list archive at Nabble.com
Github user Tibor17 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/maven/pull/34#issuecomment-68697988
Hi Jason,
the point of this patch is to force the devs to write `safe` code.
Immediately as I have seen the code I recognized, same as Herve stated in my
email
Github user Tibor17 closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/maven/pull/34
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature
Github user Tibor17 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/maven/pull/34#issuecomment-68702414
Jason,
Don't worry about this patch, I'll close it - since I have private copy and
the diff.
I will wait for you patch, and then I'll go through the diff and I
Github user Tibor17 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/maven/pull/34#issuecomment-68554366
@hboutemy
@jvanzyl
Any objections to push this?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well
301 - 400 of 507 matches
Mail list logo
