Re: [CODE]: 3layer drop, looking for volunteers who are interested to play with my test builds
Testing on a Debian Wheezy AMD64 system, libc6 from experimental. Using exclusively tables in Writer. All my templates work as expected. Perfect fidelity on my archived docs. Can not tell any difference compared to 3.4.1, which is a good thing. Thanks to all the AOO devs. greg On Fri, Apr 5, 2013 at 11:31 AM, Juergen Schmidt jogischm...@gmail.comwrote: Am Freitag, 5. April 2013 um 20:36 schrieb Raphael Bircher: Hi All Am 05.04.13 19:41, schrieb janI: On 5 April 2013 18:26, Jürgen Schmidt jogischm...@gmail.com wrote: On 4/5/13 6:16 PM, janI wrote: On 5 April 2013 18:06, Jürgen Schmidt jogischm...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, I am looking for volunteers who are interested to play around with my test builds. I mainly interested in general feedback when people play around with the office and use if for some typical tasks. I have prepared builds for MacOS, Linux 64bit (built on a newer Ubuntu system). Windows is still building :-(, I will provide a build on Monday. Linux and Windows are archive builds/packages, no installation necessary. Just unpack it and run it. MacOS is a normal dmg and I recommend to edit the bootstraprc and change the user installation. Did you do it with --with-lang if so, I can give the da or es version a spin (I assume I can do it in parallel with my stable 3.4.1). I would do in on ubuntu 12.04 64bit. I built with --with-lang=en-US de fr and tested language packs. I can include da for the enxt build ;-) For now I mainly interested in a general function test. Including features like scripts, macros, passwords, encryption ... Sorry that is not really me (I am a very ordinary user). Where are this builds? If you have one, I make a call for tests at the german community. I think there are people with interest in testing. not available, I have only uploaded the en-us version Juergen Greetings Raphael - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org -- Peace Greg Madden
I found a problem in my VM
Hi, The imageresolution of My virtual machine is 16-bit, I found maybe a problem in backingwindow form（source code corresponding in backingwindow.cxx）, when I selected the lower left corner ofthe three buttons in toolbox,thebutton picturewillhavelace. I think this is a problem, I don't kown how to fix it , who can tell me some ideas, Thanks. Yi
Re: Shell access to LAMP machines
On 6 April 2013 01:18, Kay Schenk kay.sch...@gmail.com wrote: On Fri, Apr 5, 2013 at 11:01 AM, Andrea Pescetti pesce...@apache.org wrote: Andrew Rist wrote: I'll raise my hand for US TZ - though that doesn't there isn't plenty of room for others here to step up. Who else is willing to help? (don't be shy!) Thank you! So the team is shaping this way: - jani, imacat: full access - arist, kschenk, pescetti: devops access (can manage/restart services... Kay, I'm counting you in, just let us know if I misunderstood) um...yes, you misunderstood. Please don't count me in. Maybe at some point, but not now. Thanks. Sorry not to be able to count you in. I have removed you from the nagios alert system and the vm-team mailing list. rgds jan I. Any other committers are welcome to join at any time, but we will get access for the above people enabled during the weekend. Everybody involved will need to upload (the public part of) an SSH key to id.apache.org if they haven't already one. Jan is going to prepare and send some documentation. Regards, Andrea. --**--**- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.**apache.org dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org -- MzK Achieving happiness requires the right combination of Zen and Zin.
wiki, forum, www performance upgrade.
Hi. Now that our wiki (mwiki) runs smoothly and performs quite well, it is slowly time to take a look at our other services. In order to determine what should/can be done, I need some figures. Can anybody help me with traffic figures for wiki.o.o, forum.o.o (total for the vm not per language) and www.o.o Does end-users download directly from www.o.o or from a secondary site ? I need the following numbers (if possible): - daily number of clicks (average) - peak number of clicks within a short period like 1 hour I would like to tune at least forum before we release 4.0 to prepare for a higher load. Tuning of www depend on a discussion with infra, because it is a shared service. Translate-vm also needs tunings, but that is in progress, and infra has been very kind and prepared an extra vm, so we/I install/tune without affecting the active system. thx in advance for figures. rgds jan I.
Re: wiki, forum, www performance upgrade.
On Sat, Apr 6, 2013 at 5:51 AM, janI j...@apache.org wrote: Hi. Now that our wiki (mwiki) runs smoothly and performs quite well, it is slowly time to take a look at our other services. In order to determine what should/can be done, I need some figures. Can anybody help me with traffic figures for wiki.o.o, forum.o.o (total for the vm not per language) and www.o.o Does end-users download directly from www.o.o or from a secondary site ? I need the following numbers (if possible): - daily number of clicks (average) - peak number of clicks within a short period like 1 hour From Google Analytics we have: For wiki: around 33K page views/day For forums, I have no idea. They are using a Google Analytics account ( UA-1087265-8) that is not connected with the rest of the website. If that could be updated to match the rest of the website we'd have typical numbers in a week. For the website as a whole (all subdomains tracked) it is around 730K/day for a peak day. If you subtract out the forum traffic and the downloads (which serviced by SourceForge) then the static website is probably more like 600K/day visits. So that indirectly answers your other question -- the big download files are from the SourceForge distribution network. But we do have smaller downloads, of documentation PDF's. These are mainly from the wiki. In terms of peaks, our biggest day usually Wednesday, lowest on Sunday. The variation there around 200K/visits. Hourly peak is around 15K visits for all tracked subdomains together. Note: for all of these I'm talking about pages, where a single page could include several HTTP calls, for the HTML, the Javascript, images, etc. Since anyone with Javascript not enabled would not register, the actual numbers are probably a little bit higher than this. In any case, one approach would be to enable GA for the Forums, track that for a week or two and then compare that to the Wiki numbers. If the stacks are similar, then we could think of the traffic ratio between the two and tune based on that. I would like to tune at least forum before we release 4.0 to prepare for a higher load. Tuning of www depend on a discussion with infra, because it is a shared service. If it is like the release of 3.4.0 and 3.4.1 we'll get a few hot pages: 1) The announcement blog post. With both 3.4.0 and 3.4.1 releases these were heavily linked to by the press. Roller went down in the 3.4.1 case. I don't know if that was due to the traffic or not. But we might want to plan on having the announcement post be a static webpage just to be sure. 2) The homepage and http://www.openoffice.org/download page will be hot. You can see from the download chart the boost we get when a new release occurs: http://www.openoffice.org/stats/downloads.html (AOO 3.4.0 was May 8th 2012 and AOO 3.4.1 was Aug 23rd). Translate-vm also needs tunings, but that is in progress, and infra has been very kind and prepared an extra vm, so we/I install/tune without affecting the active system. thx in advance for figures. rgds jan I.
Curved connector shape points
Hello, it's possible to get information about curved connector shapes, which available in exported svg file (path fill=none stroke=black d=M 227 239 L 328 90 L 346 250 L 201 124 L 410 150 L 228 238 /) in d attribute without exporting to svg? Maybe it's stored in Shape property or something like? Service ConnectorShape includes service LineProperties. It contains what i need? -- Борисов Антон - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
source code for find and replace by (format) in openoffice
-- Forwarded message -- From: Arwa A ar.ss@gmail.com Date: Apr 4, 2013 10:18 PM Subject: source code for find and replace by (format) in openoffice To: us...@openoffice.apache.org Cc: Hi I have problem i can't download source code of open office. I try and search it every day i can download some but i am not sure it is source code of open office. all this It's very complicated. I can't understand. I would like to suggest you send me only code for find and replace function (by format) if possible for open office to me. I prefer only find and replace code. Could you kindly send it to me? I hope you can help me.
Re: [CODE]: 3layer drop, looking for volunteers who are interested to play with my test builds
Am Samstag, 6. April 2013 um 10:49 schrieb Greg Madden: Testing on a Debian Wheezy AMD64 system, libc6 from experimental. Using exclusively tables in Writer. All my templates work as expected. Perfect fidelity on my archived docs. Can not tell any difference compared to 3.4.1, which is a good thing. good to hear that, thanks for testing Juergen Thanks to all the AOO devs. greg On Fri, Apr 5, 2013 at 11:31 AM, Juergen Schmidt jogischm...@gmail.comwrote: Am Freitag, 5. April 2013 um 20:36 schrieb Raphael Bircher: Hi All Am 05.04.13 19:41, schrieb janI: On 5 April 2013 18:26, Jürgen Schmidt jogischm...@gmail.com wrote: On 4/5/13 6:16 PM, janI wrote: On 5 April 2013 18:06, Jürgen Schmidt jogischm...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, I am looking for volunteers who are interested to play around with my test builds. I mainly interested in general feedback when people play around with the office and use if for some typical tasks. I have prepared builds for MacOS, Linux 64bit (built on a newer Ubuntu system). Windows is still building :-(, I will provide a build on Monday. Linux and Windows are archive builds/packages, no installation necessary. Just unpack it and run it. MacOS is a normal dmg and I recommend to edit the bootstraprc and change the user installation. Did you do it with --with-lang if so, I can give the da or es version a spin (I assume I can do it in parallel with my stable 3.4.1). I would do in on ubuntu 12.04 64bit. I built with --with-lang=en-US de fr and tested language packs. I can include da for the enxt build ;-) For now I mainly interested in a general function test. Including features like scripts, macros, passwords, encryption ... Sorry that is not really me (I am a very ordinary user). Where are this builds? If you have one, I make a call for tests at the german community. I think there are people with interest in testing. not available, I have only uploaded the en-us version Juergen Greetings Raphael - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org -- Peace Greg Madden
Re: source code for find and replace by (format) in openoffice
This i the link to download the source code for OO 3.4.1 http://www.apache.org/dyn/aoo-closer.cgi/incubator/ooo/3.4.1/source/aoo-3.4.1-incubating-r1435053-src.zip On Sat, Apr 6, 2013 at 9:09 AM, Arwa A ar.ss@gmail.com wrote: -- Forwarded message -- From: Arwa A ar.ss@gmail.com Date: Apr 4, 2013 10:18 PM Subject: source code for find and replace by (format) in openoffice To: us...@openoffice.apache.org Cc: Hi I have problem i can't download source code of open office. I try and search it every day i can download some but i am not sure it is source code of open office. all this It's very complicated. I can't understand. I would like to suggest you send me only code for find and replace function (by format) if possible for open office to me. I prefer only find and replace code. Could you kindly send it to me? I hope you can help me. -- Alexandro Colorado Apache OpenOffice Contributor http://es.openoffice.org
Re: wiki, forum, www performance upgrade.
On 6 April 2013 13:37, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote: On Sat, Apr 6, 2013 at 5:51 AM, janI j...@apache.org wrote: Hi. Now that our wiki (mwiki) runs smoothly and performs quite well, it is slowly time to take a look at our other services. In order to determine what should/can be done, I need some figures. Can anybody help me with traffic figures for wiki.o.o, forum.o.o (total for the vm not per language) and www.o.o Does end-users download directly from www.o.o or from a secondary site ? I need the following numbers (if possible): - daily number of clicks (average) - peak number of clicks within a short period like 1 hour From Google Analytics we have: For wiki: around 33K page views/day For forums, I have no idea. They are using a Google Analytics account ( UA-1087265-8) that is not connected with the rest of the website. If that could be updated to match the rest of the website we'd have typical numbers in a week. Thanks for your answers, but I am a bit scared you (as a PMC) tell me they use an account unknown to us. Who has the forum account ? I have the technical power to change it (sudo access) but if a PMC tell we do no know who owns it, it would not be right just to change it. Who but the owner can authorize a change ? I trust this is a misunderstanding somewhere, it cannot be that we run a service, that we do not control, in the sense of change management. For the website as a whole (all subdomains tracked) it is around 730K/day for a peak day. If you subtract out the forum traffic and the downloads (which serviced by SourceForge) then the static website is probably more like 600K/day visits. Why do I need to subtract forum, I thought they ran as a separate dns ? do we not count on basis of our template (that loads the GA account). So that indirectly answers your other question -- the big download files are from the SourceForge distribution network. But we do have smaller downloads, of documentation PDF's. These are mainly from the wiki. In terms of peaks, our biggest day usually Wednesday, lowest on Sunday. The variation there around 200K/visits. Super just what I need. Hourly peak is around 15K visits for all tracked subdomains together. Do you know the division between mwiki, forum and www ? Note: for all of these I'm talking about pages, where a single page could include several HTTP calls, for the HTML, the Javascript, images, etc. Since anyone with Javascript not enabled would not register, the actual numbers are probably a little bit higher than this. Good point, that is very important for a a traffic server, where e.g. javascripts would be cached. I am trying to convince Infra, that we should have a common trafficserver for wiki and forum (and maybe www). Currently we use eresbus as proxy, and all packets are forwarded to the ooo-wiki2-vm where that trafficserver filters cached pages. Forum goes direct to httpd, so every packet causes mysql activity. If we had a trafficserver in eresbus, we would for wiki2 save loads of network traffic and for forum network traffic as well as mysql activity. In any case, one approach would be to enable GA for the Forums, track that for a week or two and then compare that to the Wiki numbers. If the stacks are similar, then we could think of the traffic ratio between the two and tune based on that. I agree, but not being PMC, I do not feel I am in the position to just make that change. Who owns the forum, they should authorize such a change. I can make the change (provided you tell give me the GA line to insert) when I am sure I am not doing a change that someone else depend on. I would like to tune at least forum before we release 4.0 to prepare for a higher load. Tuning of www depend on a discussion with infra, because it is a shared service. If it is like the release of 3.4.0 and 3.4.1 we'll get a few hot pages: 1) The announcement blog post. With both 3.4.0 and 3.4.1 releases these were heavily linked to by the press. Roller went down in the 3.4.1 case. I don't know if that was due to the traffic or not. But we might want to plan on having the announcement post be a static webpage just to be sure. The blog post is on the general apache server and not our www, is that correct ? 2) The homepage and http://www.openoffice.org/download page will be hot. You can see from the download chart the boost we get when a new release occurs: http://www.openoffice.org/stats/downloads.html (AOO 3.4.0 was May 8th 2012 and AOO 3.4.1 was Aug 23rd). That is a real obvious case for trafficserver, and until it is in place I can ask to have the httpd use memcached (which it might be already). Currently the www is on a general apache server, so I need strong arguments to make changes (high load is a strong argument) Translate-vm also needs tunings, but that is in progress, and infra has been very kind and prepared an
Re: Curved connector shape points
Hi Антон, Антон Борисов schrieb: Hello, it's possible to get information about curved connector shapes, which available in exported svg file (path fill=none stroke=black d=M 227 239 L 328 90 L 346 250 L 201 124 L 410 150 L 228 238 /) in d attribute without exporting to svg? Maybe it's stored in Shape property or something like? Service ConnectorShape includes service LineProperties. It contains what i need? It seems, that the curved connector shape is not a Polyline with path but a PolyPolygonBezier. It has a property PolyPolygonBezier (service PolyPolygonBezierDescriptor). This property is a struct PolyPolygonBezierCoords with the parts Coordinates, with the coordinates of the points, and Flags with the type of the points. You might get an idea, how to use that from the example in the SDK DevelopersGuide/Drawing/DrawingDemo.java Perhaps you ask not here but on a...@openoffice.apache.org. Kind regards Regina - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
RE: Proposal: Improve security by limiting committer access in SVN
I believe this is the only list to be concerned about: http://people.apache.org/committers-by-project.html#openoffice Those are the only Apache committers who have karma for the OpenOffice project. Notice that there is a separate list for the PMC: http://people.apache.org/committers-by-project.html#openoffice. - Dennis -Original Message- From: Andrea Pescetti [mailto:pesce...@apache.org] Sent: Saturday, April 06, 2013 09:47 To: dev@openoffice.apache.org Cc: Joe Schaefer Subject: Re: Proposal: Improve security by limiting committer access in SVN [ ... ] Committer rights are usually never revoked based on the fact that merit does not expire. But in this case there was no merit at all: there are about 10 people at http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/OpenOfficeProposal that I never heard about. And if nobody ever heard about them, then we might want to prune the committers list (in another discussion). But, again, this is a totally different issue than limiting SVN access to a subset of the committers for (perceived) enhanced security: we already have good scrutiny and revert capabilities in place. Regards, Andrea. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: wiki, forum, www performance upgrade.
On Apr 6, 2013, at 2:51 AM, janI wrote: Hi. Now that our wiki (mwiki) runs smoothly and performs quite well, it is slowly time to take a look at our other services. In order to determine what should/can be done, I need some figures. Can anybody help me with traffic figures for wiki.o.o, forum.o.o (total for the vm not per language) and www.o.o Does end-users download directly from www.o.o or from a secondary site ? I need the following numbers (if possible): - daily number of clicks (average) - peak number of clicks within a short period like 1 hour I would like to tune at least forum before we release 4.0 to prepare for a higher load. Tuning of www depend on a discussion with infra, because it is a shared service. The website is as tuned as can be. All that is served is static content with server side includes. It is served along with www.apache.org and all the other TLPs. Everyone publishes using staging and svnpubsub. It is a standard. I think we should focus on our unique environments and conform to Infra for www. An exception would be is the project wanted some type of CRUD service. In that case we are where we are with the MWiki and Forum. Likely building a custom LAMP or Java/Tomcat stack on a VM. Regards, Dave Translate-vm also needs tunings, but that is in progress, and infra has been very kind and prepared an extra vm, so we/I install/tune without affecting the active system. thx in advance for figures. rgds jan I. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: wiki, forum, www performance upgrade.
On Sat, Apr 6, 2013 at 12:37 PM, janI j...@apache.org wrote: On 6 April 2013 13:37, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote: On Sat, Apr 6, 2013 at 5:51 AM, janI j...@apache.org wrote: Hi. Now that our wiki (mwiki) runs smoothly and performs quite well, it is slowly time to take a look at our other services. In order to determine what should/can be done, I need some figures. Can anybody help me with traffic figures for wiki.o.o, forum.o.o (total for the vm not per language) and www.o.o Does end-users download directly from www.o.o or from a secondary site ? I need the following numbers (if possible): - daily number of clicks (average) - peak number of clicks within a short period like 1 hour From Google Analytics we have: For wiki: around 33K page views/day For forums, I have no idea. They are using a Google Analytics account ( UA-1087265-8) that is not connected with the rest of the website. If that could be updated to match the rest of the website we'd have typical numbers in a week. Thanks for your answers, but I am a bit scared you (as a PMC) tell me they use an account unknown to us. Who has the forum account ? I have the technical power to change it (sudo access) but if a PMC tell we do no know who owns it, it would not be right just to change it. Who but the owner can authorize a change ? I trust this is a misunderstanding somewhere, it cannot be that we run a service, that we do not control, in the sense of change management. I assume this is just a legacy account from Sun days. The same GA code was used for other OOo-associated web services as well. I raised this issue a year ago on this mailing list: http://markmail.org/thread/mtknhgrwjkajj2ux I'm assuming this is just a lack of maintenance issue and we can add it to the list of other things that need attention. For the website as a whole (all subdomains tracked) it is around 730K/day for a peak day. If you subtract out the forum traffic and the downloads (which serviced by SourceForge) then the static website is probably more like 600K/day visits. Why do I need to subtract forum, I thought they ran as a separate dns ? do we not count on basis of our template (that loads the GA account). Sorry, I meant subtract out the wiki traffic. GA reports the total traffic for all tracked domains, and then allows filtering by URL pattern. So total traffic minus the /wiki/ traffic minus the download traffic gives us the static website traffic. So that indirectly answers your other question -- the big download files are from the SourceForge distribution network. But we do have smaller downloads, of documentation PDF's. These are mainly from the wiki. In terms of peaks, our biggest day usually Wednesday, lowest on Sunday. The variation there around 200K/visits. Super just what I need. Hourly peak is around 15K visits for all tracked subdomains together. Do you know the division between mwiki, forum and www ? I can't seem to filter on the GA screen that gives hourly detail, so I only see the count cross-subdomain. Note: for all of these I'm talking about pages, where a single page could include several HTTP calls, for the HTML, the Javascript, images, etc. Since anyone with Javascript not enabled would not register, the actual numbers are probably a little bit higher than this. Good point, that is very important for a a traffic server, where e.g. javascripts would be cached. We might be able to get the httpd logs from Infra, in which case we could do more traditional traffic stats. I am trying to convince Infra, that we should have a common trafficserver for wiki and forum (and maybe www). Currently we use eresbus as proxy, and all packets are forwarded to the ooo-wiki2-vm where that trafficserver filters cached pages. Forum goes direct to httpd, so every packet causes mysql activity. If we had a trafficserver in eresbus, we would for wiki2 save loads of network traffic and for forum network traffic as well as mysql activity. In any case, one approach would be to enable GA for the Forums, track that for a week or two and then compare that to the Wiki numbers. If the stacks are similar, then we could think of the traffic ratio between the two and tune based on that. I agree, but not being PMC, I do not feel I am in the position to just make that change. Who owns the forum, they should authorize such a change. I can make the change (provided you tell give me the GA line to insert) when I am sure I am not doing a change that someone else depend on. I've certainly raised the issue on the list previously and there were no objections. If you have access let me know offline and I can give you the codes. Note that this root page is not in the Apache CMS. It doesn't look phpBB-related so there might be a static page out there on that host that would need to be
[Default settings]Selecting a java environment
I think there is already a bug report for this, but I cannot find it right now. When you perform a new install with a new profile, under the menu Options → OpenOffice → Java you have the Use Java runtime environment checkbox selected, but *none* of the available java environments listed below is checked: you need to explicitly click on the radio button to the left of one of the java version. This confuse new users, specially if they have only one java environment on their systems, because they do not realize that there is a radio button there and think that the first checkbox should be enough, not understanding why base or other java based components/extensions do not work. See for example this thread on the forum: http://forum.openoffice.org/en/forum/viewtopic.php?f=7t=60830 Is it possible to make AOO automatically select one of the listed java environments? Or at least to make more clear that no jvm is selected? Regards Ricardo
Re: wiki, forum, www performance upgrade.
On 6 April 2013 21:21, Dave Fisher dave2w...@comcast.net wrote: On Apr 6, 2013, at 2:51 AM, janI wrote: Hi. Now that our wiki (mwiki) runs smoothly and performs quite well, it is slowly time to take a look at our other services. In order to determine what should/can be done, I need some figures. Can anybody help me with traffic figures for wiki.o.o, forum.o.o (total for the vm not per language) and www.o.o Does end-users download directly from www.o.o or from a secondary site ? I need the following numbers (if possible): - daily number of clicks (average) - peak number of clicks within a short period like 1 hour I would like to tune at least forum before we release 4.0 to prepare for a higher load. Tuning of www depend on a discussion with infra, because it is a shared service. The website is as tuned as can be. All that is served is static content with server side includes. It is served along with www.apache.org and all the other TLPs. Everyone publishes using staging and svnpubsub. It is a standard. I think we should focus on our unique environments and conform to Infra for www. An exception would be is the project wanted some type of CRUD service. In that case we are where we are with the MWiki and Forum. Likely building a custom LAMP or Java/Tomcat stack on a VM. I agree in general, which is also why my focus is on our forum (just as it was on our mwiki), and only very secondary and not AOO project related on the www. There was a general discussion on the infra channel when I configured ooo-wiki2-vm, it turned out wiki.o.o is more or less the only site that uses the trafficserver, and maybe it would be an advantage to use a trafficserver across all asf www's, this is however not a relevant discussion on this list. I wanted the numbers so I can look at the usage pattern between www and wiki/forum, and make some predictions. I am sorry if I gave the impression that my focus is www ! my focus is AOO special services meaning ooo-wiki2-vm, ooo-forum-vm and translate-vm (this is an infra supported service, but mainly used by AOO). However I try to think across asf projects, when I do infra work, so our work and resources are used for the benefit of asf and not only a single project. rgds jan I. Regards, Dave Translate-vm also needs tunings, but that is in progress, and infra has been very kind and prepared an extra vm, so we/I install/tune without affecting the active system. thx in advance for figures. rgds jan I. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: wiki, forum, www performance upgrade.
On 6 April 2013 22:21, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote: On Sat, Apr 6, 2013 at 12:37 PM, janI j...@apache.org wrote: On 6 April 2013 13:37, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote: On Sat, Apr 6, 2013 at 5:51 AM, janI j...@apache.org wrote: Hi. Now that our wiki (mwiki) runs smoothly and performs quite well, it is slowly time to take a look at our other services. In order to determine what should/can be done, I need some figures. Can anybody help me with traffic figures for wiki.o.o, forum.o.o (total for the vm not per language) and www.o.o Does end-users download directly from www.o.o or from a secondary site ? I need the following numbers (if possible): - daily number of clicks (average) - peak number of clicks within a short period like 1 hour From Google Analytics we have: For wiki: around 33K page views/day For forums, I have no idea. They are using a Google Analytics account ( UA-1087265-8) that is not connected with the rest of the website. If that could be updated to match the rest of the website we'd have typical numbers in a week. Thanks for your answers, but I am a bit scared you (as a PMC) tell me they use an account unknown to us. Who has the forum account ? I have the technical power to change it (sudo access) but if a PMC tell we do no know who owns it, it would not be right just to change it. Who but the owner can authorize a change ? I trust this is a misunderstanding somewhere, it cannot be that we run a service, that we do not control, in the sense of change management. I assume this is just a legacy account from Sun days. The same GA code was used for other OOo-associated web services as well. I raised this issue a year ago on this mailing list: http://markmail.org/thread/mtknhgrwjkajj2ux I'm assuming this is just a lack of maintenance issue and we can add it to the list of other things that need attention. Ok, I just wanted to be sure, when I come around to it, I will find the header page in forum and change. Sadly enough the setup of the forum vm is not a piece of cake, it seems to have gone through quite a lot of changes (but it works and that is important). For the website as a whole (all subdomains tracked) it is around 730K/day for a peak day. If you subtract out the forum traffic and the downloads (which serviced by SourceForge) then the static website is probably more like 600K/day visits. Why do I need to subtract forum, I thought they ran as a separate dns ? do we not count on basis of our template (that loads the GA account). Sorry, I meant subtract out the wiki traffic. GA reports the total traffic for all tracked domains, and then allows filtering by URL pattern. So total traffic minus the /wiki/ traffic minus the download traffic gives us the static website traffic. ok, got it. So that indirectly answers your other question -- the big download files are from the SourceForge distribution network. But we do have smaller downloads, of documentation PDF's. These are mainly from the wiki. In terms of peaks, our biggest day usually Wednesday, lowest on Sunday. The variation there around 200K/visits. Super just what I need. Hourly peak is around 15K visits for all tracked subdomains together. Do you know the division between mwiki, forum and www ? I can't seem to filter on the GA screen that gives hourly detail, so I only see the count cross-subdomain. Note: for all of these I'm talking about pages, where a single page could include several HTTP calls, for the HTML, the Javascript, images, etc. Since anyone with Javascript not enabled would not register, the actual numbers are probably a little bit higher than this. Good point, that is very important for a a traffic server, where e.g. javascripts would be cached. We might be able to get the httpd logs from Infra, in which case we could do more traditional traffic stats I have the httpd logs for forum and mwiki, but I miss a tool to make proper statistic. I have asked in the httpd channel, but no luck. . I am trying to convince Infra, that we should have a common trafficserver for wiki and forum (and maybe www). Currently we use eresbus as proxy, and all packets are forwarded to the ooo-wiki2-vm where that trafficserver filters cached pages. Forum goes direct to httpd, so every packet causes mysql activity. If we had a trafficserver in eresbus, we would for wiki2 save loads of network traffic and for forum network traffic as well as mysql activity. In any case, one approach would be to enable GA for the Forums, track that for a week or two and then compare that to the Wiki numbers. If the stacks are similar, then we could think of the traffic ratio between the two and tune based on that.
Re: wiki, forum, www performance upgrade.
On Sat, Apr 6, 2013 at 5:19 PM, janI j...@apache.org wrote: On 6 April 2013 22:21, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote: On Sat, Apr 6, 2013 at 12:37 PM, janI j...@apache.org wrote: On 6 April 2013 13:37, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote: On Sat, Apr 6, 2013 at 5:51 AM, janI j...@apache.org wrote: Hi. Now that our wiki (mwiki) runs smoothly and performs quite well, it is slowly time to take a look at our other services. In order to determine what should/can be done, I need some figures. Can anybody help me with traffic figures for wiki.o.o, forum.o.o (total for the vm not per language) and www.o.o Does end-users download directly from www.o.o or from a secondary site ? I need the following numbers (if possible): - daily number of clicks (average) - peak number of clicks within a short period like 1 hour From Google Analytics we have: For wiki: around 33K page views/day For forums, I have no idea. They are using a Google Analytics account ( UA-1087265-8) that is not connected with the rest of the website. If that could be updated to match the rest of the website we'd have typical numbers in a week. Thanks for your answers, but I am a bit scared you (as a PMC) tell me they use an account unknown to us. Who has the forum account ? I have the technical power to change it (sudo access) but if a PMC tell we do no know who owns it, it would not be right just to change it. Who but the owner can authorize a change ? I trust this is a misunderstanding somewhere, it cannot be that we run a service, that we do not control, in the sense of change management. I assume this is just a legacy account from Sun days. The same GA code was used for other OOo-associated web services as well. I raised this issue a year ago on this mailing list: http://markmail.org/thread/mtknhgrwjkajj2ux I'm assuming this is just a lack of maintenance issue and we can add it to the list of other things that need attention. Ok, I just wanted to be sure, when I come around to it, I will find the header page in forum and change. Sadly enough the setup of the forum vm is not a piece of cake, it seems to have gone through quite a lot of changes (but it works and that is important). For the website as a whole (all subdomains tracked) it is around 730K/day for a peak day. If you subtract out the forum traffic and the downloads (which serviced by SourceForge) then the static website is probably more like 600K/day visits. Why do I need to subtract forum, I thought they ran as a separate dns ? do we not count on basis of our template (that loads the GA account). Sorry, I meant subtract out the wiki traffic. GA reports the total traffic for all tracked domains, and then allows filtering by URL pattern. So total traffic minus the /wiki/ traffic minus the download traffic gives us the static website traffic. ok, got it. So that indirectly answers your other question -- the big download files are from the SourceForge distribution network. But we do have smaller downloads, of documentation PDF's. These are mainly from the wiki. In terms of peaks, our biggest day usually Wednesday, lowest on Sunday. The variation there around 200K/visits. Super just what I need. Hourly peak is around 15K visits for all tracked subdomains together. Do you know the division between mwiki, forum and www ? I can't seem to filter on the GA screen that gives hourly detail, so I only see the count cross-subdomain. Note: for all of these I'm talking about pages, where a single page could include several HTTP calls, for the HTML, the Javascript, images, etc. Since anyone with Javascript not enabled would not register, the actual numbers are probably a little bit higher than this. Good point, that is very important for a a traffic server, where e.g. javascripts would be cached. We might be able to get the httpd logs from Infra, in which case we could do more traditional traffic stats I have the httpd logs for forum and mwiki, but I miss a tool to make proper statistic. I have asked in the httpd channel, but no luck. I use a commercial tool called WebLog Expert. I'm happy to run a report on the logs if they are accessible. -Rob . I am trying to convince Infra, that we should have a common trafficserver for wiki and forum (and maybe www). Currently we use eresbus as proxy, and all packets are forwarded to the ooo-wiki2-vm where that trafficserver filters cached pages. Forum goes direct to httpd, so every packet causes mysql activity. If we had a trafficserver in eresbus, we would for wiki2 save loads of network
Re: wiki, forum, www performance upgrade.
On 7 April 2013 00:16, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote: On Sat, Apr 6, 2013 at 5:19 PM, janI j...@apache.org wrote: On 6 April 2013 22:21, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote: On Sat, Apr 6, 2013 at 12:37 PM, janI j...@apache.org wrote: On 6 April 2013 13:37, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote: On Sat, Apr 6, 2013 at 5:51 AM, janI j...@apache.org wrote: Hi. Now that our wiki (mwiki) runs smoothly and performs quite well, it is slowly time to take a look at our other services. In order to determine what should/can be done, I need some figures. Can anybody help me with traffic figures for wiki.o.o, forum.o.o (total for the vm not per language) and www.o.o Does end-users download directly from www.o.o or from a secondary site ? I need the following numbers (if possible): - daily number of clicks (average) - peak number of clicks within a short period like 1 hour From Google Analytics we have: For wiki: around 33K page views/day For forums, I have no idea. They are using a Google Analytics account ( UA-1087265-8) that is not connected with the rest of the website. If that could be updated to match the rest of the website we'd have typical numbers in a week. Thanks for your answers, but I am a bit scared you (as a PMC) tell me they use an account unknown to us. Who has the forum account ? I have the technical power to change it (sudo access) but if a PMC tell we do no know who owns it, it would not be right just to change it. Who but the owner can authorize a change ? I trust this is a misunderstanding somewhere, it cannot be that we run a service, that we do not control, in the sense of change management. I assume this is just a legacy account from Sun days. The same GA code was used for other OOo-associated web services as well. I raised this issue a year ago on this mailing list: http://markmail.org/thread/mtknhgrwjkajj2ux I'm assuming this is just a lack of maintenance issue and we can add it to the list of other things that need attention. Ok, I just wanted to be sure, when I come around to it, I will find the header page in forum and change. Sadly enough the setup of the forum vm is not a piece of cake, it seems to have gone through quite a lot of changes (but it works and that is important). For the website as a whole (all subdomains tracked) it is around 730K/day for a peak day. If you subtract out the forum traffic and the downloads (which serviced by SourceForge) then the static website is probably more like 600K/day visits. Why do I need to subtract forum, I thought they ran as a separate dns ? do we not count on basis of our template (that loads the GA account). Sorry, I meant subtract out the wiki traffic. GA reports the total traffic for all tracked domains, and then allows filtering by URL pattern. So total traffic minus the /wiki/ traffic minus the download traffic gives us the static website traffic. ok, got it. So that indirectly answers your other question -- the big download files are from the SourceForge distribution network. But we do have smaller downloads, of documentation PDF's. These are mainly from the wiki. In terms of peaks, our biggest day usually Wednesday, lowest on Sunday. The variation there around 200K/visits. Super just what I need. Hourly peak is around 15K visits for all tracked subdomains together. Do you know the division between mwiki, forum and www ? I can't seem to filter on the GA screen that gives hourly detail, so I only see the count cross-subdomain. Note: for all of these I'm talking about pages, where a single page could include several HTTP calls, for the HTML, the Javascript, images, etc. Since anyone with Javascript not enabled would not register, the actual numbers are probably a little bit higher than this. Good point, that is very important for a a traffic server, where e.g. javascripts would be cached. We might be able to get the httpd logs from Infra, in which case we could do more traditional traffic stats I have the httpd logs for forum and mwiki, but I miss a tool to make proper statistic. I have asked in the httpd channel, but no luck. I use a commercial tool called WebLog Expert. I'm happy to run a report on the logs if they are accessible. Thx, I will see if the log can come down to a size where I can transport them. Forum is now changed to our main GA account, and I changed all the language forums as well, can you please check that we get
LanguageTool have problems on dev builds (no context menu suggestions)
I just noticed that the LanguageTool extension(1) have some problems on both, the latest builds from the build bot and the one layer build from Jürgen, but it works without issues on 3.4.1 so it's not a problem with the extension but with AOO. To test the problem, after installing the extension and restarting AOO type some text with grammar errors like a repeated word. The grammar error will be underlined with a blue wavy line on all versions, but if you right click on it you'll get suggestions only on 3.4.1, not on the 4.0 dev builds. Running the full spell and grammar check (F7) will work, only the context menu have problems and only for grammar errors: a right click over a spell error will show suggestions. I'm testing the 64 bits Linux builds. I did not fill an issue yet because I'm not sure which product do I need to use (extensions, Writer, lingucomponent, other?) (1) http://languagetool.org/ Regards Ricardo
[QA][Weekly Report] Defects Status weekly report as of 2013/04/08
Hi, all Defects status weekly report as of 20130408: http://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/QA/Report/DefectStatus#Weekly_report_as_of_2013.2F04.2F08
