Re: Project Information

t/blob/main/content/doap_openoffice.rdf > That is the data that we update. >> This is really beyond my understanding... > The Project Information page itself is updated (based on our submitted > data) by a cron job. Apparently that failed this time. Now it is updated! We can close this tas

Re: Project Information

yond my understanding... The Project Information page itself is updated (based on our submitted data) by a cron job. Apparently that failed this time. No magic involved! ;-) Regards,    Matthias > > Best, > Pedro > >> On 03/04/2023 3:25 PM WET Matthias Seidel wrote: >>

Re: Project Information

dro Lino: > >> Hi Matthias > >> > >>> On 03/04/2023 11:03 AM WET Matthias Seidel > >>> wrote: > >>> Our updated Project Information is still not published: > >>> > >>> https://projects.apache.org/project.html?

Re: Project Information

gt; On 03/04/2023 11:03 AM WET Matthias Seidel >>> wrote: >>> Our updated Project Information is still not published: >>> >>> https://projects.apache.org/project.html?openoffice >>> >>> Normally this is done by a cron job. Am I

Re: Project Information

Hi Pedro, Am 04.03.23 um 13:22 schrieb Pedro Lino: > Hi Matthias > >> On 03/04/2023 11:03 AM WET Matthias Seidel >> wrote: >> Our updated Project Information is still not published: >> >> https://projects.apache.org/project.html?openoffice >> >> N

Re: Project Information

Hi Matthias > On 03/04/2023 11:03 AM WET Matthias Seidel wrote: > Our updated Project Information is still not published: > > https://projects.apache.org/project.html?openoffice > > Normally this is done by a cron job. Am I missing something? Maybe the expectation &qu

Project Information

Hi all, Our updated Project Information is still not published: https://projects.apache.org/project.html?openoffice Normally this is done by a cron job. Am I missing something? Regards,    Matthias smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

[GitHub] [openoffice] ardovm merged pull request #160: Remove SuSE packaging information

ardovm merged PR #160: URL: https://github.com/apache/openoffice/pull/160 -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail:

[GitHub] [openoffice] ardovm commented on pull request #160: Remove SuSE packaging information

ardovm commented on PR #160: URL: https://github.com/apache/openoffice/pull/160#issuecomment-1312416674 I will merge this PR in one week if no one objects -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above

[GitHub] [openoffice] ardovm opened a new pull request, #160: Remove SuSE packaging information

ardovm opened a new pull request, #160: URL: https://github.com/apache/openoffice/pull/160 The SuSE RPMs depend on certain files that were once present in SuSE distributions, and were deprecated. Freedesktop RPMs should work flawlessly on today's SUSE and openSUSE distributions.

Re: How to get debug information (Java, oxt)

est Peter Am 03.10.21 um 15:12 schrieb Rony G. Flatscher: Searched on the Internet but found no pointers so asking here. Problem: something goes wrong while registering a Java based extension (an oxt ), but no information is supplied. Question: how to get debug (logging) information from a

Re: How to get debug information (Java, oxt)

. Problem: something goes wrong while registering a Java based extension (an oxt ), but no information is supplied. Question: how to get debug (logging) information from a Java based extension? Maybe with a Java stacktrace? ---rony P.S.: Could find the cause in the oxt, but this was really quite

Re: How to get debug information (Java, oxt)

based extension (an oxt ), but no information is supplied. Question: how to get debug (logging) information from a Java based extension? Maybe with a Java stacktrace? ---rony P.S.: Could find the cause in the oxt, but this was really quite time consuming (and therefore effortful). Some new

Re: How to get debug information (Java, oxt)

Hi Carl, On 6/4/2022 3:31 PM, Carl Marcum wrote: ... cut ... Am 03.10.21 um 15:12 schrieb Rony G. Flatscher: Searched on the Internet but found no pointers so asking here. Problem: something goes wrong while registering a Java based extension (an oxt ), but no information is supplied

Re: How to get debug information (Java, oxt)

sdk installed? All the best Peter Am 03.10.21 um 15:12 schrieb Rony G. Flatscher: Searched on the Internet but found no pointers so asking here. Problem: something goes wrong while registering a Java based extension (an oxt ), but no information is supplied. Question: how to get debug (loggi

Re: How to get debug information (Java, oxt)

here. Problem: something goes wrong while registering a Java based extension (an oxt ), but no information is supplied. Question: how to get debug (logging) information from a Java based extension? Maybe with a Java stacktrace? ---rony P.S.: Could find the cause in the oxt

Re: How to get debug information (Java, oxt)

registering a Java based extension (an oxt ), but no information is supplied. Question: how to get debug (logging) information from a Java based extension? Maybe with a Java stacktrace? ---rony P.S.: Could find the cause in the oxt, but this was really quite time consuming (and therefore effortful

Re: AOO available in the Microsoft Store app (background information)

Hi Marcus, Am 16.01.22 um 16:18 schrieb Marcus: > Am 15.01.22 um 15:05 schrieb Matthias Seidel: >> Since there were no public information from me until this "project" was >> successfully launched on the last minute in parallel with Windows 11, I >> want to give som

Re: AOO available in the Microsoft Store app (background information)

Am 15.01.22 um 15:05 schrieb Matthias Seidel: Since there were no public information from me until this "project" was successfully launched on the last minute in parallel with Windows 11, I want to give some details (now that I have time): Microsoft introduced the possibility

AOO available in the Microsoft Store app (background information)

Hi all, Since there were no public information from me until this "project" was successfully launched on the last minute in parallel with Windows 11, I want to give some details (now that I have time): Microsoft introduced the possibility to publish "classic" Windows programs

How to get debug information (Java, oxt)

Searched on the Internet but found no pointers so asking here. Problem: something goes wrong while registering a Java based extension (an oxt ), but no information is supplied. Question: how to get debug (logging) information from a Java based extension? Maybe with a Java stacktrace? ---rony

What information do we know about the market penetration of AOO?

Hello, back in the days of OpenOffice.org, there was a well-maintained pool of information about the market penetration of OpenOffice.org (links to market research, third-party analysis, etc.). I would like to ask if anyone, beyond the bare download numbers, knows of similar information

Re: Apache OpenOffice Project Information

t I recognized a slightly bigger vertical space >>>>>> between the topics on the main page and also the boxes on the download >>>>>> page. This may be a css issue. Nothing really big. >>>>> right, but have a look also for the fonts and font size

Re: Apache OpenOffice Project Information

gt; page. This may be a css issue. Nothing really big. >>>> right, but have a look also for the fonts and font sizes. Also here >>>> are visible changes. >>> Just to be clear: by "project site" I mean >>> https://github.com/apache/openoffice-project

Re: Apache OpenOffice Project Information

look also for the fonts and font sizes. Also here >>> are visible changes. >> >> Just to be clear: by "project site" I mean >> https://github.com/apache/openoffice-project not >> https://github.com/apache/openoffice-org which I haven't built yet. > Yes, y

Re: Apache OpenOffice Project Information

Hi - > On Nov 15, 2020, at 9:31 AM, Dave Fisher wrote: > > > >> On Nov 15, 2020, at 8:17 AM, Marcus wrote: >> >> Am 15.11.20 um 16:07 schrieb Matthias Seidel: >>> Am 15.11.20 um 15:54 schrieb Andrea Pescetti: Matthias Seidel wrote: By the way: these were my first edits to

Re: Apache OpenOffice Project Information

https://github.com/apache/openoffice-project not > https://github.com/apache/openoffice-org which I haven't built yet. Yes, you are right. The project information is located on the project site. Sorry for the confusion. ;-) IMO the project site is ready for switching. > > And I don't really

Re: Apache OpenOffice Project Information

> On Nov 15, 2020, at 9:25 AM, Andrea Pescetti wrote: > > Marcus ha scritto: >> Am 15.11.20 um 16:07 schrieb Matthias Seidel: >>> Am 15.11.20 um 15:54 schrieb Andrea Pescetti: Matthias Seidel wrote: By the way: these were my first edits to the the project site after the

Re: Apache OpenOffice Project Information

> On Nov 15, 2020, at 8:17 AM, Marcus wrote: > > Am 15.11.20 um 16:07 schrieb Matthias Seidel: >> Am 15.11.20 um 15:54 schrieb Andrea Pescetti: >>> Matthias Seidel wrote: >>> >>> By the way: these were my first edits to the the project site after >>> the migration and everything was smooth,

Re: Apache OpenOffice Project Information

Marcus ha scritto: Am 15.11.20 um 16:07 schrieb Matthias Seidel: Am 15.11.20 um 15:54 schrieb Andrea Pescetti: Matthias Seidel wrote: By the way: these were my first edits to the the project site after the migration and everything was smooth, thanks a lot Dave! It really looks good for

Re: Apache OpenOffice Project Information

Am 15.11.20 um 16:07 schrieb Matthias Seidel: Am 15.11.20 um 15:54 schrieb Andrea Pescetti: Matthias Seidel wrote: By the way: these were my first edits to the the project site after the migration and everything was smooth, thanks a lot Dave! It really looks good for production. Technically

Re: Apache OpenOffice Project Information

and published it. However the cron job needs some time to pick up the new information: https://projects.apache.org/project.html?openoffice > > By the way: these were my first edits to the the project site after > the migration and everything was smooth, thanks a lot Dave! It really &g

Re: Apache OpenOffice Project Information

Matthias Seidel wrote: https://github.com/apache/openoffice-project/blob/main/content/doap_openoffice.rdf I'll regenerate it from the standard template, just in case something changed there too. Please update it in the new repository. Pushed. The template had indeed been updated (references

Re: Apache OpenOffice Project Information

still writable, right?) > to the new one, so I will push to the new repositories only. Thanks for that! Please update it in the new repository. But I'd like to have that information updated asap, so I will probably copy it to online version in SVN then.

Re: Apache OpenOffice Project Information

Dave Fisher wrote: The file in question is here: https://github.com/apache/openoffice-project/blob/main/content/doap_openoffice.rdf You can leave further updates to this file to me for this weekend. I'll regenerate it from the standard template, just in case something changed there too. I

Re: Apache OpenOffice Project Information

pic up again. > > Our Project Information still lists SVN as Code Repository. We moved to > Git long ago. > People who look into SVN will get the impression that there is > absolutely no development going on... > > Is it possible to update the data now? > > Regards, > >

Re: Apache OpenOffice Project Information

Hi all, After the release of AOO 4.1.8 it is time to bump this topic up again. Our Project Information still lists SVN as Code Repository. We moved to Git long ago. People who look into SVN will get the impression that there is absolutely no development going on... Is it possible to update

Re: New Mirror Information (London, UK)

Don’t trust it. We know nothing about it. No one we know requested it. > On Jul 10, 2020, at 12:23 PM, Martin Groenescheij > wrote: > > Strange to receive this important information from someone who isn't > subscribed to the list. > Sounds like a Phishing email > >

Re: Apache OpenOffice Project Information

Hi Andrea, Am 13.04.20 um 17:26 schrieb Andrea Pescetti: > On 12/04/2020 Matthias Seidel wrote: >> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openoffice/site/trunk/content/doap_openoffice.rdf >> >> I would like to have it updated, esp. for the repository change from >> Subversion to Git. >> >> There is a

Re: Apache OpenOffice Project Information

Hi Andrea, Am 13.04.20 um 17:26 schrieb Andrea Pescetti: > On 12/04/2020 Matthias Seidel wrote: >> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openoffice/site/trunk/content/doap_openoffice.rdf >> >> I would like to have it updated, esp. for the repository change from >> Subversion to Git. >> >> There is a

Re: Apache OpenOffice Project Information

On 12/04/2020 Matthias Seidel wrote: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openoffice/site/trunk/content/doap_openoffice.rdf I would like to have it updated, esp. for the repository change from Subversion to Git. There is a tool for creating such a file: https://projects.apache.org/create.html The

RE: Apache OpenOffice Project Information

> -Original Message- > From: Marcus [mailto:marcus.m...@wtnet.de] > Sent: Monday, April 13, 2020 11:21 AM > To: dev@openoffice.apache.org > Subject: Re: Apache OpenOffice Project Information > >> In order to have some more context an addition like > "

RE: Apache OpenOffice Project Information

> -Original Message- > From: Matthias Seidel [mailto:matthias.sei...@hamburg.de] > Sent: Monday, April 13, 2020 10:26 AM > To: dev@openoffice.apache.org > Subject: Re: Apache OpenOffice Project Information > > Hi Marcus, > > Am 13.04.20 um 09:53 schrieb Ma

Re: Apache OpenOffice Project Information

OpenOffice Project Information Like every ASF projects we do have Project Informations: https://projects.apache.org/project.html?openoffice The data is taken from this file: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openoffice/site/trunk/content /doap_openoffice.rdf I would like to have it updated, esp

Re: Apache OpenOffice Project Information

Am 13.04.20 um 10:27 schrieb Matthias Seidel: Am 13.04.20 um 10:12 schrieb Marcus: Am 12.04.20 um 23:59 schrieb Matthias Seidel: Am 12.04.20 um 23:49 schrieb Marcus: Am 12.04.20 um 22:13 schrieb Peter Kovacs: yea, the subversion should be changed. Maybe the summary could be checked, if we

Re: Apache OpenOffice Project Information

Hi Marcus, Am 13.04.20 um 10:12 schrieb Marcus: > Am 12.04.20 um 23:59 schrieb Matthias Seidel: >> Am 12.04.20 um 23:49 schrieb Marcus: >>> Am 12.04.20 um 22:13 schrieb Peter Kovacs: yea, the subversion should be changed. Maybe the summary could be checked, if we can use the project

Re: Apache OpenOffice Project Information

ache.org >>> Subject: Apache OpenOffice Project Information >>> >>> Like every ASF projects we do have Project Informations: >>> >>> https://projects.apache.org/project.html?openoffice >>> >>> The data is taken from this file: >>> &

Re: Apache OpenOffice Project Information

Am 12.04.20 um 23:59 schrieb Matthias Seidel: Am 12.04.20 um 23:49 schrieb Marcus: Am 12.04.20 um 22:13 schrieb Peter Kovacs: yea, the subversion should be changed. Maybe the summary could be checked, if we can use the project summary we give in the reports. this was also my idea. ;-)

Re: Apache OpenOffice Project Information

Am 13.04.20 um 09:31 schrieb Jörg Schmidt: -Original Message- From: Matthias Seidel [mailto:matthias.sei...@hamburg.de] Sent: Sunday, April 12, 2020 8:38 PM To: dev@openoffice.apache.org Subject: Apache OpenOffice Project Information Like every ASF projects we do have Project

RE: Apache OpenOffice Project Information

> -Original Message- > From: Matthias Seidel [mailto:matthias.sei...@hamburg.de] > Sent: Sunday, April 12, 2020 8:38 PM > To: dev@openoffice.apache.org > Subject: Apache OpenOffice Project Information > > Hi all, > > Like every ASF projects we do have Proje

Re: Apache OpenOffice Project Information

Hi Marcus, Am 12.04.20 um 23:49 schrieb Marcus: > Am 12.04.20 um 22:13 schrieb Peter Kovacs: >> yea, the subversion should be changed. Maybe the summary could be >> checked, if we can use the project summary we give in the reports. > > this was also my idea. ;-) > > @Matthias: > But why creating

Re: Apache OpenOffice Project Information

Am 12.04.20 um 22:13 schrieb Peter Kovacs: yea, the subversion should be changed. Maybe the summary could be checked, if we can use the project summary we give in the reports. this was also my idea. ;-) @Matthias: But why creating a new file? The existing one can be updated. Marcus Am

Re: Apache OpenOffice Project Information

yea, the subversion should be changed. Maybe the summary could be checked, if we can use the project summary we give in the reports. I am not volunteering. I am already on to many topics. Am 12.04.20 um 20:37 schrieb Matthias Seidel: Hi all, Like every ASF projects we do have Project

Apache OpenOffice Project Information

Hi all, Like every ASF projects we do have Project Informations: https://projects.apache.org/project.html?openoffice The data is taken from this file: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openoffice/site/trunk/content/doap_openoffice.rdf I would like to have it updated, esp. for the repository

Security bulletin information update.

Hello. Usually the information about fixed security vulnerabilities was published on https://www.openoffice.org/security/bulletin.html in few weeks after AOO new release. Or there just was mentioned that no fixes were made this time. Is it time to make this info pulic and update

Re: OpenOffice 4.1.6 fixed security vulnerabilities information

Does anybody know what vulnerabilities were fixed in OpenOffice 4.1.6? When the appropriate information will be published? -- Sergey 29.12.2018, 03:08, "Torokhov Sergey" : > Hello. > > The page https://www.openoffice.org/security/bulletin.html states that > >>  Ope

OpenOffice 4.1.6 fixed security vulnerabilities information

ublish the information about fixed CVE? I'm interesting because in Gentoo the security team initially looked up the OpenOffice before update the package in portage tree. -- Sergey - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apac

Re: Information about used MS Visual Studio versions?

e.apache.org<mailto:dev@openoffice.apache.org> Subject: Re: Information about used MS Visual Studio versions? Hi Jörg, I can only speak for version 4.1.4 and 4.1.5, but those were built with MS Visual C++ Compilers 2008 Standard Edition: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openoffice/devtools/b

RE: Information about used MS Visual Studio versions?

g<mailto:dev@openoffice.apache.org> Subject: Re: Information about used MS Visual Studio versions? Hi Jörg, I can only speak for version 4.1.4 and 4.1.5, but those were built with MS Visual C++ Compilers 2008 Standard Edition: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openoffice/devtools/build-scripts/4.1.4/

Re: Information about used MS Visual Studio versions?

/wntmsci/ReadMe.txt No changes for AOO 4.1.6 planned. Regards,    Matthias Am 14.09.2018 um 09:33 schrieb Jörg Schmidt: > Hello, > > Where can I get the information which (old) OOo/AOO versions were compiled > against which concrete version of MS Visual Studio? > > The rea

Re: Information about used MS Visual Studio versions?

if backport to 4.1.6 is an option. The current requirements you find on https://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/Documentation/Building_Guide_AOO/Building_on_Windows Am 14. September 2018 09:33:35 MESZ schrieb "Jörg Schmidt" : >Hello, > >Where can I get the information which (old) OO

Information about used MS Visual Studio versions?

Hello, Where can I get the information which (old) OOo/AOO versions were compiled against which concrete version of MS Visual Studio? The reason of my question is the current problems with Windows 10 and KB4343909, for example reported in: https://forum.openoffice.org/en/forum/viewtopic.php?f

Re: Extention License information on the webinterface

On 4/27/18 12:49 PM, Dave Fisher wrote: > Hi - > >> On Apr 27, 2018, at 9:37 AM, Marcus <marcus.m...@wtnet.de> wrote: >> >> Am 26.04.2018 um 07:45 schrieb Peter Kovacs: >>> I wonder if we could fuel the Extention information presented on the &g

Re: Extention License information on the webinterface

ses being gratis. Licensing information, and cost would be useful additions, provided they are accurate. (I don't expect an extension whose price is demarcated in Euro's to have a dollar equivalent, or vice-versus.) On second thoughts, listing the cost would have to be run past Apache Legal, to ens

Re: Extention License information on the webinterface

an-dictionary-thesaurus-hyphenation-patterns-20160210 I wonder if we can read the extention description and use that for the extention page. It could help to clarify the user before downloading which condition he is expecting to agree to. Plus we could maybe add search functionality based

Re: Extention License information on the webinterface

the user before downloading which condition he is expecting to agree to. Plus we could maybe add search functionality based on license information. If you think the step further we could use all the information stored in an extention to explain what the extention is about. Am 27. April 2018 19:41:54

Re: Extention License information on the webinterface

<marcus.m...@wtnet.de>: >Am 26.04.2018 um 07:45 schrieb Peter Kovacs: >> I wonder if we could fuel the Extention information presented on the >> website from the Information provided in the Extention itself. >> In addition we store only rateings from users to the extention

Re: Extention License information on the webinterface

Hi - > On Apr 27, 2018, at 9:37 AM, Marcus <marcus.m...@wtnet.de> wrote: > > Am 26.04.2018 um 07:45 schrieb Peter Kovacs: >> I wonder if we could fuel the Extention information presented on the website >> from the Information provided in the Extention itself. &

Re: Extention License information on the webinterface

Am 26.04.2018 um 07:45 schrieb Peter Kovacs: I wonder if we could fuel the Extention information presented on the website from the Information provided in the Extention itself. In addition we store only rateings from users to the extention. Is this a possible vision? Where are the cave eats

Extention License information on the webinterface

Hi all, I wonder if we could fuel the Extention information presented on the website from the Information provided in the Extention itself. In addition we store only rateings from users to the extention. Is this a possible vision? Where are the cave eats for this? Thanks. All the best Peter

Re: Bugzilla information

I disagree. You have to make your point. Not to object will only strengthen other position because your view remains unheard. The best weapon against haters is love and dignity. Am 22. Mai 2017 18:32:39 MESZ schrieb esh1907 : >The way to treat such people: >1. Change our

Re:Bugzilla information

It's a very good point Peter. Diversity in the office software space is good. And you're right; People aren't going to stop using AOO if the PMC decided to stop releasing new versions. Please note to others I'm not some TDF/LO stooge. I actually use MS Office for work and OnlyOffice for

Re: Bugzilla information

The way to treat such people: 1. Change our software license so any code sharing between us and them becomes impossible. 2. Arrange legally for the brand name they so desire to be forever unavailable even if our project will be terminated in the future. 3. Ignore them. On Sun, May 21, 2017 at

Re: Bugzilla information

The other offices are doing well. And competition is awesomely great. You have forgotten to mention some competitors that also put some awesome offers on the table. I like the diversity this is causing. I have joined in September last year and do not plan to swap project soon. I joined the

Re: Bugzilla information

I sometimes wonder if these people monitoring our mailing list don't have a real life... I know such zealots for almost 30 years now. They do not understand that people are free to do what they want and to use what they want. Matthias Am 21.05.2017 um 11:13 schrieb Marcus: > Am 20.05.2017 um

Re: Bugzilla information

Am 20.05.2017 um 21:35 schrieb Meh: Hey I saw the bugzilla thread and thought I'd share some info; another attempt to tell a story that only specific people want to know. How boring. Marcus -- Ciao Marcus - To

Re: Bugzilla information

> From: Meh [mailto:espri...@yandex.ru] > The only reason AOO still exists is a community of people who > ideologically believe that GPL/LO is bad and unrestrictive > licenses are great. No, that is not correct. Here at AOO are also people who do not agree with the TDF, which is not a

Bugzilla information

Hey I saw the bugzilla thread and thought I'd share some info; There have been 3 attempts by Apache and OpenOffice members in the past couple years to do a dignified retirement before the code rot creates an unusable state for AOO and it becomes an embarrassment for the FOSS community. The

Re: More Buildbot Information

Most excellent. Thx!! > On Sep 17, 2016, at 7:50 AM, Gavin McDonald wrote: > > Hi All, > > For those wanting to follow along or assist in the ASF hosted Buildbot > builds, I created a > new wiki page with some info about the builds and their hosts, how to update, >

More Buildbot Information

Hi All, For those wanting to follow along or assist in the ASF hosted Buildbot builds, I created a new wiki page with some info about the builds and their hosts, how to update, trigger builds etc. https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/Buildbot+info My work on migrating builds

Re: License information

nt s to us. Althought donations are encourage. On Tue, Sep 6, 2016 at 12:56 AM, Harkesh Yadav <harkeshyada...@gmail.com> wrote: > Dear sir > I am just confirm for the license of *Apache open office *It’s a free or > chargeable software please provide the information

License information

Dear sir I am just confirm for the license of *Apache open office *It’s a free or chargeable software please provide the information *Thanks & Regards Harkesh * * 9711087683*

Re: Where to find information about *.xcu schema (extension, dev, toolbar)

>Where to find information about *.xcu schema (extension, dev, toolbar) Use this extension: http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/Extensions_Packager Easy to produce OXT - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsub

Re: Where to find information about *.xcu schema (extension, dev, toolbar)

On 04/07/2016 07:55 AM, Christian Giehl wrote: Hi, I'm currently working on a custom toolbar for my oo-extension. To create the visual appearance of the toolbar, I have to write an Addons.xcu file, which contains a custom xml. However, the tag names and attributes I found in the tutorial all

Where to find information about *.xcu schema (extension, dev, toolbar)

Hi, I'm currently working on a custom toolbar for my oo-extension. To create the visual appearance of the toolbar, I have to write an Addons.xcu file, which contains a custom xml. However, the tag names and attributes I found in the tutorial all across the www are not sufficient for my case

Fwd: FOSDEM: Practical information

Forwarding Daniel's excellent message in case someone plans to attend FOSDEM and is not on the dev@community list. I've updated https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/COMDEV/FOSDEM+2016 with the information earlier discussed on this list. See you there! Andrea Forwarded Message

Re: Ian Lynch information needed

On 13/09/2015 Kay Schenk wrote: Thank you. And it seems I mis-typed the year.in the memorial page. New revision attached. Thank you Kay. This final version is now published at http://www.apache.org/memorials/ Regards, Andrea.

Re: Ian Lynch information needed

Hi Andrea, I didn't get the chance to read the memorial until now, I most say is a great piece. However they omit a big part of his life which was his professional one. As his linkedin page says ( https://uk.linkedin.com/pub/ian-lynch/0/a88/bb2) he was a Registered Inspector of schools accredited

Re: Wrongful information on the Wikipedia

kipedia. Correcting erroneous >> information, which is proper to do, is unlikely to be achieved via an >> edit war. Don't bring a knife to a gunfight. Any progress would >> only be made by showing Mr. Gerard's own conflict and his bad will >> (not hard to do), and escalating

Re: Wrongful information on the Wikipedia

<dger...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> On Wed, 16 Sep 2015 21:27:53 GMT, Rob Weir <r...@robweir.com> wrote: >> >> > Last word, in case the inference is unclear. We're dealing with a >> > sophisticated serial infringer on Wikipedia. Correcting erroneous >> > info

Re: Wrongful information on the Wikipedia

ticated serial infringer on Wikipedia. Correcting erroneous > > information, which is proper to do, is unlikely to be achieved via an > > edit war. Don't bring a knife to a gunfight. Any progress would > > only be made by showing Mr. Gerard's own conflict and his bad will >

Re: Wrongful information on the Wikipedia

On Wed, 16 Sep 2015 21:27:53 GMT, Rob Weir <r...@robweir.com> wrote: > Last word, in case the inference is unclear. We're dealing with a > sophisticated serial infringer on Wikipedia. Correcting erroneous > information, which is proper to do, is unlikely to be achieved vi

Re: Wrongful information on the Wikipedia

On 17/09/15 15:30, Phillip Rhodes wrote: > This is about Wikipedia being accurate, and the simple truth is, Wikipedia is not about accuracy, nor is it about truth. What it is about, is whether or not the delusions and hallucinations of the editors can be supported by an appeal to an external

Re: Wrongful information on the Wikipedia

Phillip Rhodes wrote: All of the above said, maybe we should drop this whole discussion Well, it remains the fact that "OpenOffice moribund" is false. The primary sources cited in the article (all of which are clearly misinterpreted) are: - A message from Juergen saying that he won't be

Re: Wrongful information on the Wikipedia

By golly you are right, I didn't notice that mr. David Gerard has really turned this into a personal crusade of his. On Wed, Sep 16, 2015 at 3:35 AM, Larry Gusaas wrote: > On 2015-09-15, 5:17 PM John D'Orazio wrote: > >> Well actually the case of the wikipedia article is

RE: Wrongful information on the Wikipedia

Time, gentlemen, time. We're far across the ad hominem boundary and it is time to let this thread go night-night. Whatever is thought of about what happens on Wikipedia, it is not ASF and AOO business. We have our own business to attend to. If folks want to keep fussing about it, there are

Re: Wrongful information on the Wikipedia

he_OpenOffice), I wouldn't make a big >> deal about having a separate article but I would oppose the POV opinions >> about Apache not having legal rights to the OpenOffice.org project (hence >> the corrections to the infobox information). >> I don't know all of t

Re: Wrongful information on the Wikipedia

> On 16 Sep 15, at 15:38, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote: > > Time, gentlemen, time. > > We're far across the ad hominem boundary and it is time to let this thread go > night-night. > > Whatever is thought of about what happens on Wikipedia, it is not ASF and AOO > business.

Re: Wrongful information on the Wikipedia

big deal about having a separate article but I would oppose the POV opinions about Apache not having legal rights to the OpenOffice.org project (hence the corrections to the infobox information). I don't know all of the technicalities, so the edits I just made might not be precise, for example whi

Re: Wrongful information on the Wikipedia

out Apache not having legal rights to the OpenOffice.org project (hence > the corrections to the infobox information). > I don't know all of the technicalities, so the edits I just made might not > be precise, for example which release was the first release to have the > Apache license? > Is thi

  1   2   3   >