SWCs contained compiled AS, not the .as file itself. And Royale SWCs also
contain .js files. So the proof is really in SWFDump-ing the library.swf
in the SWC. We need to verify that JewelThemeFontInject is in the
library.swf.
So:
-unzip the SWC.
-Run bin/swfdump -abc library.swf >MySWC.txt
Hi Carlos,
I don't think there is a previous implementation. I believe that all
other functions in CSS that we've run into so far have been converted in
the output to a Number or String. I think you can design any structure
you want, although primitive like an Array might have less overhead and
Hi Alex,
ok, so you said I need to create a data structure for linear-gradient that
should be handled in each SWF and JS codes.
But don't know from where I can start, maybe some guidance on where are
located the other data structures and if there's one similar to check (and
maybe copy in part)
I
Hi Alex,
2018-03-06 22:04 GMT+01:00 Alex Harui :
> Hi Carlos,
>
> I don't think there is per-platform CSS, so
> org.apache.royale.jewel.JewelThemeFontInject needs to be in the SWC for
> both the SWF and JS compile.
right, I checked both SWF and JS SWC files and both
Hi Carlos,
I don't think there is per-platform CSS, so
org.apache.royale.jewel.JewelThemeFontInject needs to be in the SWC for
both the SWF and JS compile. I couldn't quite tell from the commit
message, but it looked like JewelThemeFontInject might have been set up to
be JSOnly.
Also, it
Hi Alex,
more near, but still fails. I put the quotes failed, then I figured that I
put in jewel package similar to lib, so I changed to :
fonts: ClassReference("org.apache.royale.jewel.JewelThemeFontInject");
this failed in similar way:
[INFO] Executing MXMLC in tool group Royale with args:
Hi Carlos,
Comments inline.
On 3/6/18, 10:45 AM, "carlos.rov...@gmail.com on behalf of Carlos Rovira"
wrote:
>Hi Alex,
>
>for SWF I think we should have something like [1] [2]
>
>what I don't know right now is what does royale
I missed that ClassReference puts the class in quotes. Try:
fonts: ClassReference("JewelThemeFontInject") ;
HTH,
-Alex
On 3/6/18, 10:31 AM, "carlos.rov...@gmail.com on behalf of Carlos Rovira"
wrote:
>Hi Alex,
>
>the 4 method
Hi Alex,
for SWF I think we should have something like [1] [2]
what I don't know right now is what does royale compiler under the hood to
bring the "linear-gradient" values to the flash part, maybe generate some
AS3 code? from there we can get those values and use in the flash code
similar to
Hi Alex,
the 4 method seems ok but I'm getting this error:
[INFO] Executing MXMLC in tool group Royale with args:
[-load-config=/Users/carlosrovira/Dev/Royale/Source/royale-asjs/examples/royale/JewelExample/target/compile-app-
config.xml,
So you want to ship with the controversial situation we have now?
I'm not going to start a release unless we are going to get enough votes
and not get mired down in further debating of this situation. Also, if
there is a ruling that requires changes after I start the release then I
will have
Only from classes actually linked into the final application
will be used.
I think there are a few choices:
1) require everyone use a particular html-template
2) require some bead be used
3) require a different Application subclass
4) try to hack it in as follows:
In the defaults.css for Jewel,
Hi Piotr,
Your advice is no longer true (was true until recently). Carlos can move
the visual styling from the Button Type selectors in defaults.css to
basic.css.
I have seen some surprising defaults in the browsers, like border-width
defaulting to 4px. So a simple test is to not use Royale at
I figured I’d wait a couple of weeks. Like I said: I don’t think it should hold
up a release if we don’t get an answer immediately.
> On Mar 6, 2018, at 6:11 PM, Alex Harui wrote:
>
> It is March 6. How many days should we wait? Especially given that the
> current
Hi Carlos,
If you can find a way to handle linear-gradient for SWF that would be
great. I don't know this area of the code that well, but I think you have
at least 3 choices:
1) Alter the AST
2) Output a String
3) Reduce it to a function call.
FWIW, #3 requires changing the reducer which seems
Hi Piotr,
no, that's that I want to get in the resultant html file. I don't think I
understand your question, that's exactly what I'm asking, why that line is
not in the final HTML file, I suppose that is because is a theme file and
maybe the JewelThemeClasses.as is not used, but don't know how
It is March 6. How many days should we wait? Especially given that the
current VP Legal as resigned and no replacement has been announced yet?
Thoughts?
-Alex
On 3/6/18, 1:03 AM, "Harbs" wrote:
>The path data appears to be from the CC-BY derivative and not the public
Link once again: https://fonts.googleapis.com/css?family=Lato;
rel="stylesheet">
2018-03-06 17:06 GMT+01:00 Piotr Zarzycki :
> I meant here something else. Do you have in your head something like that
> after compilation in the html files ?
>
>
I meant here something else. Do you have in your head something like that
after compilation in the html files ?
https://fonts.googleapis.com/css?family=Lato; rel="stylesheet">
2018-03-06 17:01 GMT+01:00 Carlos Rovira :
> Hi Piotr,
>
> I introduced a new line in
Hi Piotr,
I introduced a new line in Application.as in Jewel UI set to start
implementing responsiveness in mobile:
this line is ok at that level since all jewel apps could be responsive
that line appears ok in final html
but the one in the theme, is not appearing in the html
the rest seems
HI Piotr,
2018-03-06 15:31 GMT+01:00 Piotr Zarzycki :
> If you are extending Basic components, you got styles from there. If you
> don't need those styles you will have to do one of the two things in my
> opinion:
>
> 1) Exclude basic styles as we did it in MDL
>
If you are extending Basic components, you got styles from there. If you
don't need those styles you will have to do one of the two things in my
opinion:
1) Exclude basic styles as we did it in MDL
2) Override some of them using theme/your css file style
2018-03-06 15:26 GMT+01:00 Carlos
In fact, If I remove the styles in basic, I end with some visual changes in
JewelExample, like SVG strokes more thick in the buttons. Don't know
exactly why this is happening, but it's clear that styles from basic
component should be exactly 0, and then if people wants basic styles they
should use
Carlos,
Thanks for clarification :) That's sounds good! :)
2018-03-06 12:31 GMT+01:00 Carlos Rovira :
> Hi Piotr,
>
> for compiler I expect to solve (if I can, since is not my conformt zone and
> I need to see what can I do) bugs in CSS.
> Don't see anything that not
Hi Piotr,
for compiler I expect to solve (if I can, since is not my conformt zone and
I need to see what can I do) bugs in CSS.
Don't see anything that not should go directly to develop since should be
commits solving concrete issues (like #25, and #26)
In the other hand, my work will be in 3
Hi,
just let you know that I made this refactor and remove old branches.
I merged compiler changes in develop, since I think are not specific of
Jewel.
So, for the moment I'll use only one branch in asjs until I need more
branches.
If for example, I fix a compiler problem in CSS I'll commit to
The path data appears to be from the CC-BY derivative and not the public domain
original.
I do think we need to either get clarification of replace the path data (and
possibly SVG file). I’m happy doing it myself.
I have opened a JIRA for an official ruling on the topic. It feels like it’s
Thanks Om!
I was checking your examples and If I understand ok, you where trying to
make some skin translation to XSLT, but don't understand the final focus.
Hope you can tell me about your target with this experiments.
btw, what tool you use to create the SVGs in that folder?
For what I see,
28 matches
Mail list logo