d I have both gone
> through a release process?
>
> I’m sure the necessity (or lack thereof) will become clear to us once
> we’ve done it.
>
> > On Apr 3, 2020, at 11:23 AM, Carlos Rovira
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Alex,
> >
> > trying to summarize again
lease with any tool we like (as long as it
> takes care
> of preparing a RC that is valid in all build systems we support).
>
> Validation PMCs are doing as well as the RM would then simply be based on
> that
> tag in GIT and simply validate the RC sources, maven artifacts and
doing so.
>
> One way to not have to actually type 90+ command is to use the Ant steps
> or CI jobs. Ideas on how to do less typing to execute these 90+ commands
> are welcome.
>
> -Alex
>
> On 4/2/20, 4:22 PM, "Carlos Rovira" wrote:
>
> Hi Alex,
&g
be some
thread problem since happens un one compilation from around other 15 or
so...
If someone could take a look at this, would be great, since I think is an
important problem.
I think we should detect what's happening if we can before 1.0
Thanks
> > On Thu, Apr 2, 2020 at 9:23 PM Carlos
Hi,
sending this again, since it was missed in the other thread, but is
something not related.
-- Forwarded message -
De: Carlos Rovira
Date: jue., 2 abr. 2020 a las 14:32
Subject: Re: Royale Releases
To: Apache Royale Development
Hi,
one thing I want to propose before other
asjs/wiki/Task-List-For-Royale-Releases
>
> On 4/2/20, 11:56 AM, "Carlos Rovira" wrote:
>
> Hi Alex,
>
> to understand your long email. Lets say that when I'll go to release in
> June (0.9.9), I'll use instructions described in [1].
> So that wil
ts that test the output of both to
> see if it works in both cases.
>
> Chris
>
>
>
> Am 02.04.20, 15:15 schrieb "Harbs" :
>
> Adding more coverage for Maven is good.
>
> Removing coverage for Ant is not.
>
>
erent than for Maven
> and the Ant ones happen to work.
> >
> > Ideally there would be real tests that test the output of both to see if
> it works in both cases.
> >
> > Chris
> >
> >
> >
> > Am 02.04.20, 15:15 schrieb "Harbs" :
> >
) escribió:
> Adding more coverage for Maven is good.
>
> Removing coverage for Ant is not.
>
> Do you agree?
>
> > On Apr 2, 2020, at 4:07 PM, Carlos Rovira
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Harbs,
> >
> > I think what we're trying to say is that until now w
:
> No one is arguing that we shouldn’t add more tests.
>
> Please let’s not make it seem like there’s a disagreement about that.
>
> > On Apr 2, 2020, at 10:46 AM, Carlos Rovira
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Alex,
> >
> > first, many thanks for the detailed emai
.
Thanks
El jue., 2 abr. 2020 a las 9:46, Carlos Rovira ()
escribió:
> Hi Alex,
>
> first, many thanks for the detailed email. I'll comment on this later as I
> have more time.
>
> For now, to add up a recent example on what Chris commented: If you all
> remember a week ag
through the entire compilation, not just within the file being
> visited. In
> >>> fact, I'm not even sure it has to be Object.defineProperties. It looks
> >>> like there is some criteria for being a global structure. So to me, it
> >>> looks like you can
correct and contains the usual instructions so we have
> consistency. Maybe someday there will be CI jobs to do the last 60+ steps
> if that helps. We could add a Jenkins job that runs an Ant build on RC
> artifacts on dist.a.o as well.
>
> I would like you all to help maintain the list of 100 steps and other
> documents related to the release process, and improve the CI jobs and Ant
> steps if it helps you be a more efficient RM. I am hopeful that now that I
> have hopefully explained our release process better, that we can see that
> these 100+ steps just have to be done in some way. The RM can figure out
> what way works best for them, but they must get through all of them.
>
> Thanks,
> -Alex
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
--
Carlos Rovira
http://about.me/carlosrovira
people have to type, then yes, someone will have to update that
> on the CI server. And the advantage is that other people won't have to
> keep as careful track of the steps. It comes down to doing work to save
> other people time.
>
> On 4/1/20, 11:44 AM, "Carlos Rovir
er to get real
reproducible builds in all Timezones. So sorry, but that's not my fault at
all.
Finally I understand that each change in maven or ant in the future will
break the process again due to its fragility.
--
Carlos Rovira
http://about.me/carlosrovira
ot including a key technical detail and may cause people
> to vote in a way that they wouldn't if they understood the key technical
> pieces.
>
> -Alex
>
> On 4/1/20, 11:10 AM, "Carlos Rovira" wrote:
>
> ok thanks,
>
> about cancelling vote. Piotr, Y
, and since we didn't vote at any point in
our history about just use one CI Server as unique option for releases. If
we are ok on that I think we can cancel this vote.
thanks
El mié., 1 abr. 2020 a las 18:53, Alex Harui ()
escribió:
> Worked.
>
> On 4/1/20, 9:52 AM, "Carlos
worked?
thanks
El mié., 1 abr. 2020 a las 18:46, Alex Harui ()
escribió:
> OK, thanks.
>
> On 4/1/20, 9:39 AM, "Carlos Rovira" wrote:
>
> Hi new link for [2]
>
> let's see if that works
>
>
>
> [2]
> https://nam04.safelinks.protec
t; If we're lucky, we can do one step a day. The Maven changes added several
> steps for a separate build-tools release so that's where I'm starting now.
> The upside is that the "if utils" steps will go away and some of the
> instructions in the remaining steps will
Hi new link for [2]
let's see if that works
[2] https://github.com/apache/royale-asjs/wiki/New-Release-Manager
.
>
> Thanks,
> -Alex
>
> On 4/1/20, 2:40 AM, "Carlos Rovira" wrote:
>
> Hi All,
>
> after many days of going in circles here's a propossal thread as other
> PMCs
> requested and will be followed by a Vote thread.
>
> So the proposal
: Piotr Zarzycki<mailto:piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>
> Sent: Wednesday, April 1, 2020 8:49 AM
> To: Apache Royale Development<mailto:dev@royale.apache.org>
> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Coming back to collect requirements for the
> release process
>
> Let'
, which I
> intend to do unless anyone has objections to that.
>
>
>
> *From:* Carlos Rovira
> *Sent:* Wednesday, April 1, 2020 2:44:03 PM
> *To:* Apache Royale Development
> *Subject:* Re: Some info from the current CI server emails
>
>
>
> Hi Yishay,
>
Hi,
ok perfect :)
Thanks
El mié., 1 abr. 2020 a las 13:41, Harbs () escribió:
> To be clear, I was not talking about doing the current release. I was
> talking about 0.9.8 (or whatever we’ll call it)
>
> > On Apr 1, 2020, at 2:36 PM, Carlos Rovira
> wrote:
> >
> >
> > doing and if everyone else is ok with it I’ll start working on the
> release
> > after that, hopefully this evening my time.
> >
> > Thanks.
> >
> > From: Carlos Rovira<mailto:carlosrov...@apache.org>
> > Sent: Wednesday, April 1, 2020 11:37 AM
> &
> From: Piotr Zarzycki<mailto:piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>
> Sent: Wednesday, April 1, 2020 8:49 AM
> To: Apache Royale Development<mailto:dev@royale.apache.org>
> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Coming back to collect requirements for the
> release process
>
>
appreciate all the work you and Chris have been doing to try to improve
> the release process.
>
Many thanks for you words Harbs, I hope you can catch with all the info and
get a good knowledge of all that is involved
: )
Carlos
>
> Thanks,
> Harbs
>
> --
> Carlos Rovira
> http://about.me/carlosrovira
>
>
>
>
that right for you ?
Thanks and hope you're well :)
Carlos
>
> My $0.02,
> Harbs
>
> --
> Carlos Rovira
> http://about.me/carlosrovira
>
>
>
>
Hi,
this is the vote thread about the proposal just sent.
Thanks
--
Carlos Rovira
http://about.me/carlosrovira
ki/Release-Manager-(already-tested)
[3] https://github.com/apache/royale-asjs/wiki/Release-Manager-Notes
--
Carlos Rovira
http://about.me/carlosrovira
Hi all,
since we're all a bit stuck, and Piotr and Yishay exposed that will be good
to have some vote thread, I think is a very good idea.
I'm going to start a vote thread about it, so we can avoid this current
deadlock.
Thanks
--
Carlos Rovira
http://about.me/carlosrovira
ning my time.
>
> Thanks.
>
> From: Carlos Rovira<mailto:carlosrov...@apache.org>
> Sent: Wednesday, April 1, 2020 11:37 AM
> To: Apache Royale Development<mailto:dev@royale.apache.org>
> Subject: Some info from the current CI server emails
>
> Hi,
>
>
apache.org>
> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Coming back to collect requirements for the release
> process
>
> Let's move forward with whatever you have guys :)
>
> On Wed, Apr 1, 2020, 12:51 AM Carlos Rovira
> wrote:
>
> > Hi Alex,
> >
> > so I finally understand th
ly for him, what means the same can happen to the rest of us.
https://imgur.com/a/AgRH9cB
There's still 12 steps more, to do (and many more time consuming that step
1).
Just want to expose it to see if that helps all of us here to
understand some of the current problems we are having
HTH
--
Car
ver you have guys :)
>
> On Wed, Apr 1, 2020, 12:51 AM Carlos Rovira
> wrote:
>
> > Hi Alex,
> >
> > so I finally understand that you're in favor of all RM need to run Maven
> > and ANT in the release process duplicating the effort, and in the future
>
> > Ant artifacts are reproducible by running the
> Ant scripts. Again,
> > the scenario is that if an Ant user wants to try a
> local change in an IDE
> > or NPM we want >to ensure that they can run the Ant
> "r
for IconButtonBar and subclasses
> > a2c8f39 is described below
> >
> > commit a2c8f39034ad4f048c6742f30fc530dfca17ec32
> > Author: Carlos Rovira
> > AuthorDate: Tue Mar 31 16:25:44 2020 +0200
> >
> > tour-de-jewel: Change references of FontIcon to
tation and size...so consider all of this just the "preparation"
for the full support, but want to inform now about all of it.
HTH
--
Carlos Rovira
http://about.me/carlosrovira
> > My 2 cents,
> > -Alex
> >
> > On 3/30/20, 12:11 PM, "Yishay Weiss" wrote:
> >
> > > Ant artifacts are reproducible by running the Ant scripts.
> Again,
> > the scenario is that if an Ant user wants to try a
15:19, Carlos Rovira ()
escribió:
> Many thanks Chris for the PRs and pointers so I can continue learning
> about the release project and improving :)
> Will try chain signatures with other people
>
> El dom., 29 mar. 2020 a las 14:03, Christofer Dutz (<
> christofer.d...
Hi,
this is the cancellation thread.
Thanks
--
Carlos Rovira
http://about.me/carlosrovira
Ant user wants to try a local change in an IDE or NPM we want to ensure
> that they can run the Ant "release" target and get the tar.gz or .zip they
> need.
>
> Thanks,
> -Alex
>
> On 3/30/20, 2:17 AM, "Carlos Rovira" wrote:
>
> Hi Chris,
>
>
l
> pattern of progressional-degradation, and continuing that thread will not
> bring the project forward.
> >
> > Chris
> >
>
>
--
Carlos Rovira
http://about.me/carlosrovira
t;
> > so I had another look ... and it does contain one class which was
> > donated by Adobe:
> > UnknownTreePatternInputOutput
> >
> > Even the AnnotateClass portion looked pretty much like the one that
> > originally came in with Falcon from Adobe. I didn't look at other files.
> >
> > -Alex
> >
> >
> >
>
--
Carlos Rovira
http://about.me/carlosrovira
sensus? If not, there should probably
> be a vote. I don’t want to encourage a dynamic where debates are won by
> unilateral action.
>
> If everyone feels comfortable with Carlos releasing with mvn, then I
> won’t object. If there are reservations then I’d still like to giv
nilateral action.
>
> If everyone feels comfortable with Carlos releasing with mvn, then I won’t
> object. If there are reservations then I’d still like to give it another
> week, and see if an RM newbie like me can apply the process suggested by
> Alex.
>
> Thanks.
>
> From:
eone working in
> newspapers ?)
>
> So please, I beg you, don't waste your time on things that are not
> essential and like Carlos said, go forward. From outside view, Apache
> Royale stay sticky to 0.9.7.
>
> You are so close of a v1.0, I hope see it very soon and other
Hi,
just changed the sim urls for the gitbox ones
El dom., 29 mar. 2020 a las 15:21, Carlos Rovira ()
escribió:
> Great :)
>
> El dom., 29 mar. 2020 a las 14:22, Yishay Weiss ()
> escribió:
>
>> Thanks Chris (and Carlos), that worked.
>>
>> ___
specially slow but so are other sites.
>
> From: Yishay Weiss<mailto:yishayj...@hotmail.com>
> Sent: Saturday, March 28, 2020 10:36 PM
> To: dev@royale.apache.org<mailto:dev@royale.apache.org>
> Subject: RE: Can't Push to GitHub
>
>
lse having trouble with GitHub? It’s slow and I keep getting
> the authentication window and then
>
> fatal: TaskCanceledException encountered.
>A task was canceled.
>
--
Carlos Rovira
http://about.me/carlosrovira
In actual Apache Royale development branch
- Tested Tour De Jewel example working as expected
El sáb., 28 mar. 2020 a las 12:23, Carlos Rovira ()
escribió:
> Ok Thanks Chris,
> I think now is fixed :)
>
> El sáb., 28 mar. 2020 a las 11:26, Christofer Dutz (<
> christofer.d...@c-
Hi for got to say that you need to do mvn install the new package downloaded
El sáb., 28 mar. 2020 a las 17:19, Carlos Rovira ()
escribió:
> Hi Alex,
>
> I think should be these points, after checking SHA512, from the vote (I
> left the second points about check README, that ca
no version, you're already working with the latest
1.2.0 code, so just need to pass Ant and check some simple example
HTH
Carlos
El sáb., 28 mar. 2020 a las 16:58, Alex Harui ()
escribió:
> How do we test this package?
>
> On 3/28/20, 2:02 AM, "Carlos Rovira" wrote:
>
>
you're sort of doing it like described here:
> https://plc4x.apache.org/developers/release/release.html
>
> Chris
>
> Am 28.03.20, 11:16 schrieb "Carlos Rovira" :
>
> Hi all,
>
> sorry the link to the 1.2.0 artifacts was wrong. The right one is this:
&g
Hi all,
sorry the link to the 1.2.0 artifacts was wrong. The right one is this:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/royale/compiler-build-tools/1.2.0/
Thanks
Carlos
El sáb., 28 mar. 2020 a las 11:00, Carlos Rovira ()
escribió:
> Hi,
>
> This is the vote for the 1.2.0 release of
Player version and AIR
version you tested with.
Please put all discussion about this release in the DISCUSSION thread not
this VOTE thread.
Thanks
--
Carlos Rovira
http://about.me/carlosrovira
This is the discussion thread.
Thanks,
--
Carlos Rovira
http://about.me/carlosrovira
Hi,
since releasing tools will require a vote and discussion thread, will try
to do now, since that will required some time for the vote to pass
El vie., 27 mar. 2020 a las 19:44, Carlos Rovira (<
carlos.rov...@codeoscopic.com>) escribió:
> Hi
>
> I’ll do a release of tool
Did the instructions include the staging of
> compiler-build-tools?
>
> If we combine all 3 repos into one, how hard would it be
> to release the compiler separately in the future?
>
> -Alex
>
> On 3/27
(<
piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>) escribió:
> Hi Carlos,
>
> Well it's not exactly true - there were examples of projects or attempt
> where people uses compiler only to output JS, so we should have an ability
> to release compiler only.
>
> Thanks,
> Piotr
>
> pt., 27 mar 2
ex Harui" wrote:
>
> Thanks for the list. I count 13 steps!
>
> -Alex
>
> On 3/27/20, 5:36 AM, "Carlos Rovira" wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> he exaplained in the first email that he tried to do all with his
> own nexus
> th
l vie., 27 mar. 2020 a las 16:00, Alex Harui ()
escribió:
> Thanks for the list. I count 13 steps!
>
> -Alex
>
> On 3/27/20, 5:36 AM, "Carlos Rovira" wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> he exaplained in the first email that he tried to do all with his own
> nexus
,
El vie., 27 mar. 2020 a las 12:33, Harbs () escribió:
> Yes.
>
> > On Mar 27, 2020, at 2:30 PM, Christofer Dutz
> wrote:
> >
> > Does that explain things?
>
>
--
Carlos Rovira
http://about.me/carlosrovira
DautoVersionSubmodules=true
>> -Dtag=org.apache.royale.asjs-0.9.8-rc1
>>
>> 4) mvn release:perform
>>
>> However I would need to refactor the royale-maven-plugin in order to do
>> that. But I'd be happy to do it.
>>
>> Chris
>>
>>
>
gt; However I would need to refactor the royale-maven-plugin in order to do
> that. But I'd be happy to do it.
>
> Chris
>
>
>
> Am 27.03.20, 10:39 schrieb "Carlos Rovira" :
>
> Many thanks Chris :)
>
> I think this is what Alex asked for.
> If Al
ok Yishay, thanks!
El vie., 27 mar. 2020 a las 9:57, Yishay Weiss ()
escribió:
> No objections from me.
>
>
> From: Carlos Rovira
> Sent: Friday, March 27, 2020 11:47:24 AM
> To: Apache Royale Development
> Subject: Re: Releasing: Finally
> ---
> DONE!
>
> I did a clean fork for this and updated the SCM and distributionManagement
> to use my github fork and my private Nexus for deployment … it worked great
> (After fixing 1-2 things in the ASJS repo … which weren’t found earlier as
> we never got this far). Also did I do a fake 0.9.8 release as my fork of
> the official repo had lots of relics from previous 0.9.7 release attempts.
> So don’t be confused ;-)
>
> The Net execution time of all steps were 1:04:36 … add a few minutes for
> switching branches, changing pom-versions and stuff like that …
>
> So is this the thing you folks were asking for?
>
> Chris
>
>
--
Carlos Rovira
http://about.me/carlosrovira
that are not
> essential and like Carlos said, go forward. From outside view, Apache
> Royale stay sticky to 0.9.7.
>
> You are so close of a v1.0, I hope see it very soon and other releases
> with bugs fix every 1, 2 or 3 months.
> Consider my comments as support and no
alelib} -> This should be filled automatically by I'm not sure
> > Language server ? Maybe Josh can shed some light I don't remember who
> > filled that part, for sure not Moonshine itself. I do remember there
> > were
> > discussion about that variable on mailin
ld be filled automatically by I'm not sure
> Language server ? Maybe Josh can shed some light I don't remember who
> filled that part, for sure not Moonshine itself. I do remember there were
> discussion about that variable on mailing list. :)
>
> Thanks,
> Piotr
>
> czw., 26 mar
aven and the Ant distribution?
>
> I'm asking cause I would love to make the maven distribution match the Ant
> version and just use the one Maven created in the future.
>
> Chris
>
>
> Am 26.03.20, 17:58 schrieb "Carlos Rovira" :
>
> Hi Piotr,
>
>
yck...@gmail.com>) escribió:
> Hi Carlos,
>
> Colleague from the Team was able to reproduce your problem with "Build
> Project". It looks like he fixed that - you can download Nightly Build of
> Moonshine and check.
>
> Thanks,
> Piotr
>
> pon., 23 mar 2020 o 15:10
> the bug
> > > and make tests cases with screenshoots to save your time in fixing
> > it.
> > >
> > > Using Reac, Bootstrap, AngularJS or other similar is a back to
> 80's.
> > How
> > > can I explain my customer that I need 3 ou
sorry wrong list, this was for royale :)
-- Forwarded message -
De: Carlos Rovira
Date: jue., 26 mar. 2020 a las 9:54
Subject: Reseting the state back
To:
Hi
I reset versions and remove release/tag branches, so all must be in a safe
state.
Going to wait to see if we can start
of that you are already doing on the CI server however you're not
> letting it do all automatically (For lack of credentials)
>
> But ... if you would just be doing those steps on the RM machine.
>
> Chris
>
>
>
>
>
> Am 26.03.20, 05:54 schrieb "Alex H
ll be a series of standard maven commands
(prepare, release,...), so nothing strange at all (I expect).
Do you want us to do that?
Thanks
>
> Maybe someone else can explain better than me.
>
> -Alex
>
> On 3/25/20, 2:22 PM, "Carlos Rovira" wrote:
&
ingRepositories
[2] https://imgur.com/a/w4az7pD
>
> --
> Carlos Rovira
> http://about.me/carlosrovira
>
>
>
>
and type
> them in manually at the command line and you'll get the same results.
>
As I said, this requested step from the CI Server failed for me, so I could
not sign and then upload. Is what we're trying to say.
--
Carlos Rovira
http://about.me/carlosrovira
uld download all of the artifacts, run
> the same steps, download the new artifacts and verify that the binary
> match. Then we can work on splitting those steps into chunks for the CI
> server.
>
> -Alex
>
>
> On 3/25/20, 10:13 AM, "Carlos Rovira" wr
s" :
>
> I think the focus should be to agree on the requirements. Whether an
> RM uses the tool created by Chris or Alex can be a matter of choice.
>
> From: Carlos Rovira<mailto:carlosrov...@apache.org>
> Sent: Wednesday, March 25, 2020 5:18 PM
> To:
ommands for everything till step 7
> 4 + 6 + 3 + 3 + 3 + 4 + 2 + 3 + 3 = 32
>
> So as long as we’re forced to stick to this process … I guess someone else
> will have to do it.
>
> Please feel free to revert any changes I did in the last few months.
>
> Signing off,
> Chris
>
> PS: You really should make this ApacheRoyaleCI guy a committer considering
> the amount of emails he’s writing ;-)
>
>
>
--
Carlos Rovira
http://about.me/carlosrovira
blem after that's solved.
>
> Chris
>
>
>
> Am 24.03.20, 20:08 schrieb "Alex Harui" >:
>
> Good to see progress.
>
> Re timestamps: I’m not quite sure what you are running into.
>
> The bu
= 0.9.7-SNAPSHOT, develop = 0.9.8-SNAPSHOT
> - 001b updates DEVELOP and not the release
> branch
> - 002 pushes develop to the release-branch
> hereby bumping the release branch to the next version rel = 0.9.8-SNAPSHOT,
> develop = 0.9.8-SNAPSHOT
>
we shouldn't have GPG signing on the CI Server,
> and hopefully no other credentials got added either.
>
> HTH,
> -Alex
>
> PS: I'm purposefully not looking myself so as not to accidentally boot
> someone off the RDP connection.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
--
Carlos Rovira
http://about.me/carlosrovira
Yeah, hope someone on your team could know where we can start looking :)
thanks!
Carlos
El lun., 23 mar. 2020 a las 15:04, Piotr Zarzycki (<
piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>) escribió:
> Next is reproduce your problem with Moonshine. ;)
>
> pon., 23 mar 2020 o 15:02 Carlos Ro
ld and TourDeJewel. :)
>
> Thanks,
> Piotr
>
> niedz., 22 mar 2020 o 20:58 Carlos Rovira
> napisał(a):
>
> > Hi Piotr,
> >
> > nothing happens or log is printed in the console, is like if I didn't
> push
> > the menu button.
> > I ensured that I
push
Thanks
El dom., 22 mar. 2020 a las 17:55, Piotr Zarzycki (<
piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>) escribió:
> Carlos,
>
> By saying that nothing happens - you don't get any information on the
> console at all?
>
> On Sun, Mar 22, 2020, 5:34 PM Carlos Rovira
> wrote:
>
&
nged I have exactly same issue after pulling all changes and
> rebuilding sdk.
>
> niedz., 22 mar 2020 o 12:15 Carlos Rovira
> napisał(a):
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > Many thanks for the fix Chris.
> > Piotr, can you try again and confirm if
Hi,
Chris and I are looking at some latest issues and we plan to start release
tomorrow.
Just let you know so you can be ready or if some more time is needed let us
now
Thanks
--
Carlos Rovira
http://about.me/carlosrovira
;
> [1] https://paste.apache.org/u5j0a
>
> Thanks,
> Piotr
>
> sob., 21 mar 2020 o 20:12 Carlos Rovira
> napisał(a):
>
> > Hi Piotr,
> >
> > Chris, just made maven distribution mxmlc and compc executables.
>
://github.com/apache/royale-asjs/wiki/Build-Apache-Royale-with-Maven
--
Carlos Rovira
http://about.me/carlosrovira
The project 'App' has been successfully compiled.
7.080432099 seconds
El lun., 10 feb. 2020 a las 18:19, Carlos Rovira ()
escribió:
> Ok Josh,
> understood, will take into account as I check what's going on with latest
> fails
> thanks
>
> El lun., 10 feb. 2020 a las 17:1
> > In
> > > the other words in release mode I don't see any content at all. I'm
> going
> > > to prepare separate example which shows that issue.
> > >
> > > [1]
> > >
> >
> http://apacheroyaleci2.westus2.cloudapp.azure.com:8080/job/ro
and the build passed again.
>
> Will be checking which other modules need this setting set.
>
> So please, in future: If you add settings to the plugin, do it the
> right way and don’t just change defaults and then complain that it behaves
> differently.
>
> Chris
>
>
>
>
>
--
Carlos Rovira
http://about.me/carlosrovira
ds/develop by this push:
> > new a1e3a1d tour-de-jewel: CRUD beads are not needed anymore in
> > datagrid
> > a1e3a1d is described below
> >
> > commit a1e3a1db2f3a761d479139fdac231ae24020ec9d
> > Author: Carlos Rovira
> > AuthorDate: F
you like. However it would enable RMs to choose to do it on
> their machine. As long as we have all bases covered in the process, I doubt
> there will be any objection, right?
> >
> >
> > Chris
> >
> >
> >
> > Am 20.03.20, 00:59 schrieb "Carlos Rovira&quo
> something to work and then it won't work for others. That's what
> happened
> > to me. Other PMC members who want to see you and Chris spend time
> on this
> > should probably commit to spending time testing your work. This
> makes me
> > sad that we
, Carlos Rovira ()
escribió:
> It will be of help to see what could be the problem is you send to me (or
> here) just the structure of that file. For example
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> So I can try in TDJ and see what could be the problem.
> Av
IMO, Carlos, you will have to be the RM to help prove out that the CI
> process is working again
>
> -Alex
>
> On 3/19/20, 10:34 AM, "Carlos Rovira" wrote:
>
> Hi Chris,
> thanks for the note
> :)
>
> El jue., 19 mar. 2020 a las 18:17, Chri
o test them I would sort of be doing a release and that
> would feel really strange ;-)
>
> I am totally willing to be of assistance to help the next RM do his job
> however and I am sure I'll be able to get the steps technically working.
>
> Chris
>
>
>
> Am 19.03.20, 1
701 - 800 of 3203 matches
Mail list logo
