Next Steps in the graduation process
> >
> >
> >
> > well, then this was a misunderstanding - I took your statement "We might
> > also need a Maturity Model assessment" just as a heads-up for something
> > that might not necessarily be required. Anyway,
e...@apache.org>
* Glenn Weidner <gweid...@apache.org>
* Henry Saputra <hsapu...@apache.org>
* Holden Karau <hol...@apache.org>
* Joseph Bradley<jkbrad...@apache.org>
* Luciano Resende
uild gets approved.
> -Arvind Arvind Surve | Spark Technology Center | http://www.spark.tc/
--
Luciano Resende
http://twitter.com/lresende1975
http://lresende.blogspot.com/
default.
> >>
> >> However, I'm raising this here as Janino would add another explicit
> >> dependency (with BSD license). Fortunately, Spark also uses Janino for
> >> whole-stage-codegen. So we should be able to mark Janino as provided
> >> library. The only issue is a pure Hadoop environment, where we still
> want
> >> to use code generation for CP operations. To simplify the build, I could
> >> imagine using the javax.tools.JavaCompiler for hadoop execution types,
> but
> >> Janino by default.
> >>
> >> If you have any concerns, please let me know by Monday; otherwise I'd
> like
> >> to push this change into our upcoming 0.14 release.
> >>
> >>
> >> Regards,
> >> Matthias
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
>
--
Luciano Resende
http://twitter.com/lresende1975
http://lresende.blogspot.com/
Ok, I looked in the "Release Cadence" thread and found the recent
discussions for 0.14
Here is a link to recent conversation for the benefit of others
https://www.mail-archive.com/dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org/msg01518.html
On Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 5:20 PM, Luciano Resend
What is planned for 0.14?
When the contents and dates where discussed?
On Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 4:02 PM Arvind Surve
wrote:
> Hi,
> We will be building SystemML 0.14 on Monday 04/03/2017 PST.
> Please plan on getting your changes by EOW 04/02/2017 PST
> Thanks,
> Arvind
y.apache.org/apache-way/apache-project-maturity-model.html
>
> Regards,
> Matthias
>
> On Tue, Mar 7, 2017 at 1:38 PM, Luciano Resende <luckbr1...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Mar 7, 2017 at 11:59 AM, Arvind Surve <ac...@yahoo.com.invalid>
> > wrote:
by ASF legal?
>
> - Henry
>
> On Fri, Mar 10, 2017 at 2:14 PM, Luciano Resende <luckbr1...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > I have updated the community/project portion of the SystemML podling page
> >
> > http://incubator.apache.org/projects/systemml.html
> >
>
> From: Luciano Resende <luckbr1...@gmail.com>
> To: dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org
> Sent: Friday, March 10, 2017 2:14 PM
> Subject: Re: Next Steps in the graduation process
>
> I have updated the community/project portion of the SystemML podling pag
I have updated the community/project portion of the SystemML podling page
http://incubator.apache.org/projects/systemml.html
Please take a look and let me know if I missed anything.
On Wed, Mar 8, 2017 at 11:47 AM, Luciano Resende <luckbr1...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> Great, thank you for
e...@apache.org>
* Glenn Weidner <gweid...@apache.org>
* Henry Saputra <hsapu...@apache.org>
* Holden Karau <hol...@apache.org>
* Joseph Bradley<jkbrad...@apache.org>
* Luciano Resende
this change.
>
> Regards,
> Matthias
>
--
Luciano Resende
http://twitter.com/lresende1975
http://lresende.blogspot.com/
.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=68714623
--
Luciano Resende
http://twitter.com/lresende1975
http://lresende.blogspot.com/
-resolution
We will also need to identify a project chair (see responsibilities below)
https://www.apache.org/dev/pmc.html#chair
--
Luciano Resende
http://twitter.com/lresende1975
http://lresende.blogspot.com/
> > > Date: 01/05/2017 02:14 PM
> > > Subject:Re: Release cadence
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > +1 for trying out a 1 month release cycle.
> > >
> > > However, I highly agree with Matthias that there is a lot o
] http://incubator.apache.org/guides/graduation.html
[3] http://incubator.apache.org/projects/systemml.html
--
Luciano Resende
http://twitter.com/lresende1975
http://lresende.blogspot.com/
any stop shipment issues.If you are working on any critical issue/s,
> please try to get in change/s by EOD Friday (2/17/2017) PST.
>
> ThanksArvind
> -- Arvind Surve Spark Technology Center
> http://www.spark.tc/
--
Luciano Resende
http://twitter.com/lresende1975
http://lresende.blogspot.com/
Note that we Must not just update the artifact, as whatever we publish
should be voted.
I would suggest just doing a 0.12.1 release
On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 10:14 PM Berthold Reinwald
wrote:
> yes, that is the current consensus. It is probably a bug in the release
>
Apache usually have two ways for revieweing: REview then commit, Commit
then review.
If review is becoming a bottleneck, just use CTR, maybe waiting for a PR
build to be green.
On Mon, Feb 13, 2017 at 10:03 AM wrote:
> Thanks, Deron, for bringing up this topic! PRs,
s mentioned by Justin and Sergio.
>
> Would any of our active mentors (Luciano, Henry, Reynold) be available to
> review the 0.12.0 release?
>
> Thanks!
> Deron
>
> --
> Deron Eriksson
> Spark Technology Center
> http://www.spark.tc/
>
--
Luciano Resende
http://twitter.com/lresende1975
http://lresende.blogspot.com/
would
have reduced to only the last one.
--
Luciano Resende
http://twitter.com/lresende1975
http://lresende.blogspot.com/
e version, and them
modify to the new development version. I just want to make sure it will
make these changes on the branch and not on master. Not sure if maven needs
any additional magic for that, it will be our first time running the script
on a branch.
--
Luciano Resende
http://twitter.com/lresende1975
http://lresende.blogspot.com/
the RC based on the commit
hash from the top of the 0.12 branch and do a little investigation/research
if there is any other changes to make the release prepare to modify the pom
from the branch and google is probably your friend here.
--
Luciano Resende
http://twitter.com/lresende1975
http
in
> line with the naming scheme that Spark uses for its branches, and should
> cause less confusion.
>
> --
>
> Mike Dusenberry
> GitHub: github.com/dusenberrymw
> LinkedIn: linkedin.com/in/mikedusenberry
>
> Sent from my iPhone.
>
>
> > On Jan 13, 2017, at
For creating dev branches for 1.6, first go to you local 1.6 branch and
continue with your regular steps such as git branch -b JIRA-222
And good luck !!!
--
Luciano Resende
http://twitter.com/lresende1975
http://lresende.blogspot.com/
rs discuss the roadmap and release blockers, and
also enable users to provide feedback sooner on the areas we are developing.
--
Luciano Resende
http://twitter.com/lresende1975
http://lresende.blogspot.com/
c ? as I don't think we should wait for
2017/Q2 to do a 1.0 release. I believe in release early, release often,
particularly to attract new users, that can help verifying and contributing
to specific releases.
Thoughts ?
--
Luciano Resende
http://twitter.com/lresende1975
http://lresende.blogspot.com/
I should have changed the subject to [RESULT]
On Fri, Nov 4, 2016 at 7:34 AM, Luciano Resende <luckbr1...@gmail.com>
wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, Nov 1, 2016 at 5:08 PM, Luciano Resende <luckbr1...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>>
>> Please vote on releasing the following
um-Product Optimization and
> Operator
> > > Fusion for Large- Scale Machine Learning" has been accepted at CIDR'17.
> > >
> > > How has the project developed since the last report?
> > > The main project has had 213 commits since August 1. The website
> project
> > > has
> > > had 51 commits since August 1. Since August 1, 241 issues have been
> > > reported
> > > on our JIRA site and 137 issues have been resolved or closed. 79 pull
> > > requests
> > > have been created since August 1, and 72 pull requests have been
> closed.
> > >
> > > Date of last release:
> > >
> > > 2016-06-15 (version 0.10.0-incubating)
> > >
> > > When were the last committers or PMC members elected?
> > >
> > > 2016-05-07 Glenn Weidner
> > > 2016-05-07 Faraz Makari Manshadi
> > >
> > >
> >
>
--
Luciano Resende
http://twitter.com/lresende1975
http://lresende.blogspot.com/
? ==
-1 votes should only occur for significant stop-ship bugs or legal related
issues (e.g. wrong license, missing header files, etc). Minor bugs or
regressions should not block this release.
--
Luciano Resende
http://twitter.com/lresende1975
http
out what is causing some of these regressions.
--
Luciano Resende
http://twitter.com/lresende1975
http://lresende.blogspot.com/
Off course, my +1.
On Mon, Oct 24, 2016 at 4:11 PM, Luciano Resende <luckbr1...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> Please vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache SystemML
> version 0.11.0-incubating !
>
> The vote is open for at least 72 hours and passes if a majority of at
>
gt;> >> Navigation Menu:
>> >> > - The community navigation seems to have gone wild with a few
>> >> duplications.
>> >> > We have source code and github links, which are both the same. We
>> also
>> >> have
>> >>
up for writing an article or two, let me know as well!
>
> Luciano, do you see any issues from an Apache standpoint?
>
> Thanks!
> Madison
+1, just make sure "republish" are done by the blog authors or with their
explicit permission archived on this mailing list.
--
Luciano Resende
http://twitter.com/lresende1975
http://lresende.blogspot.com/
like cleanups), I think we
might be at a point where we could publish these latest updates to the live
website.
Thoughts ?
--
Luciano Resende
http://twitter.com/lresende1975
http://lresende.blogspot.com/
? ==
-1 votes should only occur for significant stop-ship bugs or legal related
issues (e.g. wrong license, missing header files, etc). Minor bugs or
regressions should not block this release.
--
Luciano Resende
http://twitter.com/lresende1975
http
On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 11:27 AM, Frederick R Reiss <frre...@us.ibm.com>
wrote:
> These are awesome! I'm more a fan of option #4 myself.
>
>
I like option $4 myself as well.
--
Luciano Resende
http://twitter.com/lresende1975
http://lresende.blogspot.com/
ache/incubator-systemml/pull/269> in 0.11 release
> ?
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Niketan Pansare
> > IBM Almaden Research Center
> > E-mail: npansar At us.ibm.com
> > *http://researcher.watson.ibm.com/researcher/view.php?person=us-npansar*
> > <
synthesized so. I'd love
> >> input/thoughts from everyone.
> >>
> >> https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B2__Aw0kKn-uTWJ4S0ZvcHhhTE0/view
> >>
> >> Cheers,
> >>
> >> Jeremy
> >>
> >> ...
> >>
> >> Jeremy Anderson
> >> https://twitter.com/ObjectAdjective
> >> http://www.linkedin.com/in/objectadjective
> >>
> >
>
--
Luciano Resende
http://twitter.com/lresende1975
http://lresende.blogspot.com/
Please note the minor correction on the RC tag name (the actual tag hash is
correct):
The tag to be voted on is v0.11.0-incubating-rc3 (
1baebfde400134b3af6d373c254ee084a6d28cc3)
And off course, my +1
On Sat, Oct 15, 2016 at 12:27 PM, Luciano Resende <luckbr1...@gmail.com>
wrote:
>
? ==
-1 votes should only occur for significant stop-ship bugs or legal related
issues (e.g. wrong license, missing header files, etc). Minor bugs or
regressions should not block this release.
--
Luciano Resende
http://twitter.com/lresende1975
http
o
> best handle this, I'd love to hear. :)
>
+1 to incorporate this as one page in the systemml website or doc
--
Luciano Resende
http://twitter.com/lresende1975
http://lresende.blogspot.com/
8, there
> is one more performance fix I'd like to get in: SYSTEMML-1009.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Matthias
> >
> > Luciano Resende ---10/04/2016 12:29:12 PM---Mike, are these Python
> failures still blocking the next RC ? Please let me know, as I am waiting
> for
> >
> > On Oct 2, 2016, at 8:35 PM, Matthias Boehm <mbo...@us.ibm.com> wrote:
> >
> > yes, I just closed them - I left them open for Mike to confirm, but we
> resolved all known issues yesterday together. We should be good to go.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Matthias
&
mML
> matrix to frame conversions that would both be good to work on.
>
> --
>
> Mike Dusenberry
> GitHub: github.com/dusenberrymw
> LinkedIn: linkedin.com/in/mikedusenberry
>
> Sent from my iPhone.
>
>
> > On Sep 29, 2016, at 12:32 PM, Luciano Resende <luck
to build SystemML and fix a few of the Javadoc issues.
If we can get a few PRs per week, we can fix this very quick for the next
release.
Thoughts ?
--
Luciano Resende
http://twitter.com/lresende1975
http://lresende.blogspot.com/
On Wed, Sep 28, 2016 at 5:51 PM, Luciano Resende <luckbr1...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> Ok, master now have the "in progress" version of the refactored jekyll
> website and the previous working version has been tagged as v0.1.
>
>
I am also trying to list the remaining websi
on master for the website. However, I do not
> feel strongly about this issue.
>
> Anyone else any thoughts?
>
> Deron
>
>
> On Wed, Sep 28, 2016 at 1:28 PM, Luciano Resende <luckbr1...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > I have created a PR [1] porting the Jekyll b
t;
>
There is usually one version of the jar on the distribution (e.g. the
default like _2.10), but then, during release, they make the two versions
published to maven, so in case of building applications, you don't have to
actually have to build the framework with the version of Scala bei
ase make sure you review this RC as well, so we get all issues
fixed by RC2.
--
Luciano Resende
http://twitter.com/lresende1975
http://lresende.blogspot.com/
--
Luciano Resende
http://twitter.com/lresende1975
http://lresende.blogspot.com/
se with
Scala 2.11, which then will be a mismatch and the user will have to hack
it's way to be able to change the necessary places in the pom and rebuild
it.
--
Luciano Resende
http://twitter.com/lresende1975
http://lresende.blogspot.com/
publish both _2.10 and _2.11 versions to
maven ?
--
Luciano Resende
http://twitter.com/lresende1975
http://lresende.blogspot.com/
their first experience with the project very smooth and without much
problems.
- Create simple JIRAs and flag them for initial contributors (e.g.
documentation, simple fix, etc)
Any other ideas ? And how do we execute this with some priority to get us
to graduate ?
--
Luciano Resende
http
justifies a -1 vote for this release? ==
-1 votes should only occur for significant stop-ship bugs or legal related
issues (e.g. wrong license, missing header files, etc). Minor bugs or
regressions should not block this release.
--
Luciano Resende
On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 11:35 AM, Acs S <ac...@yahoo.com.invalid> wrote:
> Please vote on making Apache SystemML 0.11 release available
>
> -Arvind
What are we voting on ? Where are the artifacts that need to be reviewed ?
RC tag, etc ?
--
Luciano Resende
http://twitter.com/lr
; > point to one of the beginner's guide rather than point to the Download
> > page ? Alternatively we can add a link in Download page instructing what
> > the user should do next after downloading.
> >
> > Again, absolutely love the new website :) :)
> >
> &g
have published a in-progress version
at:
http://home.apache.org/~lresende/systemml/
--
Luciano Resende
http://twitter.com/lresende1975
http://lresende.blogspot.com/
is done, or periodically as dev, which I believe
is similar to the concept of SNAPSHOTS in maven (see
https://pypi.python.org/pypi/toree).
--
Luciano Resende
http://twitter.com/lresende1975
http://lresende.blogspot.com/
a truly great release.
>
> Deron
>
>
>
I am not suggesting to rush a release, just that we would not call 0.11 and
1.0. The time frame is based on when we are ready.
--
Luciano Resende
http://twitter.com/lresende1975
http://lresende.blogspot.com/
dalone.jar
> systemml-0.11.0-incubating-SNAPSHOT.tar.gz (also rename)
> systemml-0.11.0-incubating-SNAPSHOT.zip (also rename)
>
> This would decrease the number of our artifacts by 30% which means that we
> can validate the release faster, and the release candidate will also b
d created a new
> "spark-1.x-stable" tag simply pointing to a previous commit that was tested
> on Spark 1.x.
>
> Thanks!
>
> -Mike
>
> --
>
> Mike Dusenberry
> GitHub: github.com/dusenberrymw
> LinkedIn: linkedin.com/in/mikedusenberry
>
> Sent fr
SystemML
> @@ -41,7 +41,7 @@
> scm:git:g...@github.com:apache/incubator-
> systemml
> scm:git:h
> ttps://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator-systemml developerConnection>
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=
>
That was going to be my suggestion... In Zeppelin, we just introduced
support for different versions of scala and added support for spark 2.0
based on profiles and a bit of reflections...
Do we have to do anything related to Scala versions as well ?
On Thursday, August 4, 2016, Matthias Boehm
On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 10:05 PM, Luciano Resende <luckbr1...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> Please vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache SystemML
> version 0.10.0-incubating !
>
> The vote is open for at least 72 hours and will close on Saturday,
> Wednesday 25 and
Off course, my +1.
On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 10:05 PM, Luciano Resende <luckbr1...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> Please vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache SystemML
> version 0.10.0-incubating !
>
> The vote is open for at least 72 hours and will close on Saturday,
> We
justifies a -1 vote for this release? ==
-1 votes should only occur for significant stop-ship bugs or legal related
issues (e.g. wrong license, missing header files, etc). Minor bugs or
regressions should not block this release.
--
Luciano Resende
http
On Fri, May 20, 2016 at 10:45 PM, Luciano Resende <luckbr1...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> Please vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache SystemML
> version 0.10.0-incubating !
>
> The vote is open for at least 72 hours and will close on Saturday,
> Wednesday 25 and
t overkill?
>
> Deron
>
>
> On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 10:16 AM, Luciano Resende <luckbr1...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 5:20 PM, Deron Eriksson <deroneriks...@gmail.com
> >
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> >
shield the trunk of issues these experiments
can cause.
I would just recommend to avoid making the branch stale, and keep rebasing
it with latest master, which will make integration much easier in the
future.
--
Luciano Resende
http://twitter.com/lresende1975
http://lresende.blogspot.com/
o the 0.11.0-SNAPSHOT.
>
> Deron
>
--
Luciano Resende
http://twitter.com/lresende1975
http://lresende.blogspot.com/
be good to set these when closing the jiras.
--
Luciano Resende
http://twitter.com/lresende1975
http://lresende.blogspot.com/
justifies a -1 vote for this release? ==
-1 votes should only occur for significant stop-ship bugs or legal related
issues (e.g. wrong license, missing header files, etc). Minor bugs or
regressions should not block this release.
--
Luciano Resende
gt; wrote:
> >>
> >>> sounds good to me - in addition to PR167, I'd also like to get PR162
> >>> into this release. Furthermore, it would be good to run our full
> >>> performance testsuite (at least up to 80GB) but this could be done on
> the
>
ny other
> updates be included? Does anyone have any additional concerns?
>
>
Please let me know when this is in then.
> Luciano, would you be available as RM for this SystemML release?
>
Sure.
>
> Deron
>
--
Luciano Resende
http://twitter.com/lresende1975
http://lresende.blogspot.com/
ake it runs max_iter * 2.
Is there any reason for this behavior ? Otherwise let me know and I can
create a jira/fix.
Thanks
--
Luciano Resende
http://twitter.com/lresende1975
http://lresende.blogspot.com/
ing against both MLContext and JMLC, so we
> should support them separately until our major 1.0 release.
>
>
> Regards,
> Matthias
>
--
Luciano Resende
http://twitter.com/lresende1975
http://lresende.blogspot.com/
m/apache/incubator-systemml/commit/71a3fde27f800576d746c50ae9694aad75276b4e
> <https://github.com/apache/incubator-systemml/commit/71a3fde27f800576d746c50ae9694aad75276b4e>
> *
> https://github.com/apache/incubator-systemml/commit/61183f24ba2a9c3cd185ad0c579debf508c07ea8
> <https:/
ou need to get the released approved in the IPMC before making
it public. This means another vote on general@a.o
> We are currently at step 1. Please reply to this thread with (a) JIRA IDs
> of resolved issues that you believe should be in the mainentance release
> and (b) JIRA ids of open is
document may help you out.
> >
> > Also, in case it helps, I found the open-source Pro Git book to be very
> > useful when I started working with Git (https://progit.org/).
> >
> > Luciano recently created a samples/zeppelin-notebooks directory, so that
> is
> > the place
] http://community.apache.org/guide-to-being-a-mentor.html
[3] http://s.apache.org/gsoc2016ideas
[4] http://community.apache.org/gsoc.html
--
Luciano Resende
http://people.apache.org/~lresende
http://twitter.com/lresende1975
http://lresende.blogspot.com/
they are
looking for.
Also, I would like to suggest creating a README.md on some of these folders
(e.g. samples) that describes what the contents of the folder are.
Thoughts ?
--
Luciano Resende
http://people.apache.org/~lresende
http://twitter.com/lresende1975
http://lresende.blogspot.com/
t purposes.
I am not keen on "simplicity via minimality" neither "simplicity via common
structure"... I am keen on what makes sense I (and thus drive adoption) for
someone that is first trying to look trough SystemML code, particularly
folks that are already used to some best practice
ndly, particularly with all other ml
algorithms already there ?
--
Luciano Resende
http://people.apache.org/~lresende
http://twitter.com/lresende1975
http://lresende.blogspot.com/
--
Luciano Resende
http://people.apache.org/~lresende
http://twitter.com/lresende1975
http://lresende.blogspot.com/
Just FYI, the IPMC release approval is underway and folks that are not
subscribed to general@a.o can follow the thread at
https://www.mail-archive.com/general@incubator.apache.org/msg53110.html
--
Luciano Resende
http://people.apache.org/~lresende
http://twitter.com/lresende1975
http
On Wed, Feb 3, 2016 at 4:08 PM, Deron Eriksson <deroneriks...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> I see you edited the report on the incubator wiki. Thank you!
>
>
I had to review as a mentor, did a quick update.
--
Luciano Resende
http://people.apache.org/~lresende
http://twitter.com/lr
>
This should be ok...
> Deron
>
Please create a sub-task under SYSTEMML-463 to track this issue.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SYSTEMML-463
--
Luciano Resende
http://people.apache.org/~lresende
http://twitter.com/lresende1975
http://lresende.blogspot.com/
nt to update the pom with
> profiles for Hadoop 1 and 2.
>
> Deron
>
Even Spark is moving away of supporting some old versions of Hadoop, etc...
I would really like us to be moving kind of together with other
dependencies, in the sense of supporting Hadoop 2.6 and up, and Spark 1.6
an
t; Date: 01/20/2016 05:30 AM
> > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release SystemML 0.9-incubating (RC1)
> > +1
> > --
> > Mike Dusenberry
> > GitHub: github.com/dusenberrymw
> > LinkedIn: linkedin.com/in/mikedusenberry
> > Sent from my iPhone.
> >> On Jan 20,
e good to settle on such a workflow now that our JIRA server is
> up to avoid confusion.
>
> Luciano, is there an Apache standard that we should be following?
>
> Deron
>
There is no Apache standard, each project can discuss their preference.
--
Luciano Resende
http:
s
>
>
Most of the wait time on the release is either waiting for other jiras to
get fixed or for infra issues, as the release process is very quick.
Anyway, branch 0.9 created
https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-systemml.git
--
Luciano Resende
http://people.apache.or
;> going to the email list, and with time zone delays I thought it was a
> good
> >>> idea to get things rolling as soon as possible. We can add further
> comments
> >>> if they are required.
> >>>
> >>> Deron
> >>>
> >>>
&
> Thanks to Alex!
> >
> >
> > -Mike
> > --
> > Mike Dusenberry
> > GitHub: github.com/dusenberrymw
> > LinkedIn: linkedin.com/in/mikedusenberry
> >
> > Sent from my iPhone.
> >
>
--
Luciano Resende
http://people.apache.org/~lresende
http://twitter.com/lresende1975
http://lresende.blogspot.com/
g handled by
> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-10714 and I did not see the
> >> comment. I will request the notifications scheme in the 10714 comments.
> >>
> >> Deron
> >>
> >>
> >> On Fri, Jan 8, 2016
ormation in some of the pull request
> > conversations from the old repository that I would like to consult (with
> > regards to the JIRA issues that I'm cleaning up because of the problems
> > with the import to Apache JIRA). Could you please grant me access to see
> > the priv
uot; is still referring to the old repository.
>
> @Luciano: Could you please delete the SparkTC/systemml repository if nobody
> objects by this Friday? Thanks.
>
>
> Regards,
> Matthias
>
I have made the repository private, will delete after couple weeks if
nobody objects.
-
On Sunday, December 20, 2015, Reynold Xin wrote:
> Unfortunately only the PR submitter or the ASF infra team can close them.
>
> You can also push a commit to master and close it by using the "close #xxx"
> message.
>
>
+1, i guess there isn't much more we can do.
>
> On
n the apache-website-template, we got most of the
guidelines from free, the missing one, which is optional, is the incubator
logo... I will see if I can incorporate in the template to resolve this
issue for us.
--
Luciano Resende
http://people.apache.org/~lresende
http://twitter.com/lresende1975
http://lresende.blogspot.com/
all the file content changes as a second git commit (imports, docs,
javadocs, etc)
- Create a full build to make sure there is no breakages
- Let the team review to make sure we are not loosing history on the files
or something similar.
Thanks
--
Luciano Resende
http://people.apache.org/~
1 - 100 of 107 matches
Mail list logo