Re: [DISCUSS] ASF Board Draft Report - June 2016

This looks good to me. Thanks, Ted On Sat, Jun 4, 2016, 11:54 AM Stephen Mallette wrote: > As TinkerPop has graduated from incubator, we no longer need to produce > incubator reports. Instead, TinkerPop needs to now provide reports to the > ASF Board. Ultimately, as PMC

Re: Planning for StarGraph's Serialization Format in TinkerPop 3.3.0

If folks thought it was a good idea, I'd love to put together a little benchmarking harness so that it would be easy to swap various implementations & tweaks in and out to measure how they perform. For example, benchmarks running against different #'s of vertex properties, edge counts, # of

Re: [DISCUSS] 3.1.x code line

It does for me too, +1. --Ted On Wed, Jul 13, 2016 at 3:44 PM, Hadrian Zbarcea wrote: > +1. It does to me. > Hadrian > > > On 07/13/2016 04:29 PM, Stephen Mallette wrote: > >> Since we don't really follow semantic versioning for releases, I thought >> we >> should discuss

Re: [VOTE] TinkerPop 3.2.1 Release

Validate distribution looks good along with manual inspection of docs and testing. Thanks for putting this all together Stephen and for running me through part of the process this time. VOTE: +1 --Ted On Wed, Jul 20, 2016 at 3:42 PM, Stephen Mallette wrote: > Thanks

Re: [DISCUSS] Time Frames for 3.2.2 and 3.1.4

Hello, I think 9/5 is Labor Day. I'm wondering if we should keep the freeze on 8/27 but move the start of vote to 9/6. Not a big deal, but maybe some more folks (non-committers) would be around and see the vote thread started up if they wanted to test things out. As far as shorter release

Re: [VOTE] TinkerPop 3.1.3 Release

valitedate-distribution.sh looked good from my end along with manual tests and a review of the generated java and other docs. VOTE: +1 --Ted On Tue, Jul 19, 2016 at 1:50 PM, Dylan Millikin wrote: > Added tests for all the new features in the PHP driver. > Installed

Re: [DISCUSS] Thinking on Release

; > > > We're starting to go through reviews now with some earnest. Unless there > > are concerns, I think that we should target code freeze for Friday at > this > > point. > > > > On Wed, Jul 6, 2016 at 10:01 AM, Ted Wilmes <twil...@gmail.com> wrote: >

Re: [DISCUSS] ASF Board Draft Report - July 2016

Looks good, thanks Stephen. --Ted On Fri, Jul 8, 2016 at 7:12 AM, Stephen Mallette wrote: > ## Description: > Apache TinkerPop is a graph computing framework for both graph databases > (OLTP) and graph analytic systems (OLAP). > > It was reported last month that

Re: path query optimization

Neat find Pieter. With regards to the update to ImmutablePath, I think that defensive copying of inbound collections is generally a good idea but if we can target specific areas where we can reap big gains from not creating new collections it may be worth it to relax that constraint, especially

[VOTE] TinkerPop 3.1.6 Release

--- closing Monday (2/6/2017) at 5:00 PM CST. My vote is +1. Thank you very much, Ted Wilmes

Re: ChooseStep & count type coercion

This is one of those things that keeps gremlin tied to a > Java > > implementation and from being language-agnostic. > > > > Robert Dale > > > > On Wed, Feb 1, 2017 at 9:51 AM, Ted Wilmes <twil...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > >> Hello, >

Re: [VOTE] TinkerPop 3.1.6 Release

* NOTICE ... OK > > > > * validating Apache TinkerPop Gremlin's plugin directory ... OK > > > > * validating Apache TinkerPop Gremlin's lib directory ... OK > > > > > > > > Validating source distribution > > > > > > > > * downloading Apa

Re: [DISCUSS] Release 3.2.4 and 3.1.6

Code freeze Friday sounds good to me. Yes, I'll be submitting a PR for the PathRetractionStrategy bugs (1583 & 1597). I can take the 3.1.6 release. --Ted On Mon, Jan 23, 2017 at 9:03 AM, Marko Rodriguez wrote: > @Ted — Do you think you can fix the PathRetractionStrategy

Re: [DISCUSS] Release 3.2.4 and 3.1.6

Jason, I ctr'ed an update to docs adding instructions for getting keys setup. For some reason I'm getting consistent failures in the GLV portion of the docs when I'm generation them so I haven't published updated snapshots yet. For the time being though, if you haven't started the key process

Re: [DISCUSS] Release 3.2.4 and 3.1.6

Ted. Does the GLV issue have something to do with your python setup? > or is it a problem with the docs themselves? > > On Thu, Jan 26, 2017 at 9:26 AM, Ted Wilmes <twil...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Jason, > > I ctr'ed an update to docs adding instructions for getting ke

Code Freeze 3.1.6

Hello, We are now under code freeze for 3.1.6. Updated snapshots have been published and I'll be doing one more publish later in the week with the finalized changelog. Let me know if anything comes up in the meantime and we'll get it incorporated. Thanks, Ted

Re: ChooseStep & count type coercion

Good catch and yep, that's the one. On Fri, Feb 17, 2017 at 9:14 AM, Robert Dale <robd...@gmail.com> wrote: > I think this is the correct link > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1620 > > Robert Dale > > On Wed, Feb 1, 2017 at 12:56 PM, Ted Wilmes &

[RESULT][VOTE] TinkerPop 3.1.6 Release

This vote is now closed with a total of 5 +1s, no +0s and no -1s. The results are: BINDING VOTES: +1 (5 -- Ted Wilmes, Stephen Mallette, Daniel Kuppitz, Dylan Millikin, Jason Plurad) 0 (0) -1 (0) NON-BINDING VOTES: +1 (1 -- David Brown) 0 (0) -1 (0) Thank you very much, Ted Wilmes

Re: [VOTE] TinkerPop 3.2.4 Release

Release and docs looks good to me. Validating source distribution * downloading Apache TinkerPop 3.2.4 (apache-tinkerpop-3.2.4-src.zip)... OK * validating signatures and checksums ... * PGP signature ... OK * MD5 checksum ... OK * SHA1 checksum ... OK * unzipping Apache TinkerPop 3.2.4 ...

3.1.x code freeze lifted

The code freeze is lifted on the 3.1.x line and the 3.1.7-SNAPSHOT has been published. Thanks, Ted

TinkerPop 3.1.6 Released: A 187 On The Undercover Gremlinz

Hello, TinkerPop 3.1.6 has just been released. This maintenance release contains a number of bug fixes on the "Undercover Gremlinz" release line and should be non-breaking for your upgrade needs. The release artifacts can be found at this location:

[VOTE] TinkerPop 3.1.4 Release

) at 2:00 PM CST. My vote is +1. Thank you very much, Ted Wilmes

Re: Code Freeze 3.1.4/3.2.2

dated CHANGELOG manually since you already generated that stuff. > > > > On Wed, Aug 31, 2016 at 3:00 PM, Ted Wilmes <twil...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > The 3.1.4-SNAPSHOT docs have been published to: http://tinkerpop.apache. > > org/docs/3.1.4-SNAPSHOT/ > > >

Re: Code Freeze 3.1.4/3.2.2

, 2016 at 7:52 AM, Ted Wilmes <twil...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hello, > The 3.1.4-SNAPSHOT has been published. As Stephen mentioned, we do not > expect any > non-doc changes/additions to tp31 but let me know if something comes up. > I'll be reviewing > the docs and publish

Re: New PMC: Jason Plurad

Welcome aboard Jason! --Ted On Wed, Aug 31, 2016 at 12:20 PM, Alaa Mahmoud wrote: > Congratulations Jason! > > Alaa > > On Wed, Aug 31, 2016 at 12:30 PM, Marko Rodriguez > wrote: > > > Hello, > > > > Jason Plurad of mailing list support, Gremlin

TinkerPop 3.1 code freeze lifted

Hello, I'll be announcing the 3.1.4 release tomorrow morning but in the meantime, the code freeze is lifted on the tp31 branch and 3.1.5-SNAPSHOT jars and docs have been published. Thanks, Ted

Re: SQL-Gremlin logo?

o. Note that I also added it to the > providers.html page. Any tweaks on the logo or “bio”, please advise. > > http://tinkerpop.apache.org/providers.html > > Thanks, > Marko. > > http://markorodriguez.com > > > On Sep 13, 2016, at 8:14 PM, Ted Wilmes <twil...@gmail.com> w

Re: [VOTE] TinkerPop 3.2.2 Release

validate-distribution.sh looked good along with the javadocs and docs rendering. VOTE: +1 Thanks, Ted On Thu, Sep 8, 2016 at 2:39 PM, Daniel Kuppitz wrote: > validate-distribution.sh is happy: > > Validating binary distributions > > * downloading Apache TinkerPop Gremlin >

[RESULT][VOTE] TinkerPop 3.1.4 Release

This vote is now closed with a total of 4 +1s, no +0s and no -1s. The results are: BINDING VOTES: +1 (3 -- Ted Wilmes, Stephen Mallette, Daniel Kuppitz) 0 (0) -1 (0) NON-BINDING VOTES: +1 (1 -- David Brown) 0 (0) -1 (0) Thank you very much, Ted Wilmes

Re: When do we release TinkerPop 3.2.3?

That sounds good to me and unless someone else wants to take the reigns on 3.1.5, I can take a crack at it again. The formatting snafu in the 3.1.4 change log has been haunting my dreams since last release so I'd like to get it nailed this time. --Ted On Fri, Sep 30, 2016 at 6:04 AM, Stephen

Re: Store and Aggregate

I like the idea of deprecating aggregate and combining barrier with store to get the same behavior, but the flipped version makes more sense to me "store().barrier()" when running in OLTP mode. gremlin> g.V().out().aggregate('x').limit(1).cap('x') ==>[v[3],v[3],v[3],v[2],v[4],v[5]] gremlin>

Re: [DISCUSS] Code Review TINKERPOP-1278: gremlin-python

I was taking a look at the various parts and reading the docs, which as usual were very comprehensive. Really impressive work guys. I think your plan is a good one Stephen so +1 from me. --Ted On Fri, Aug 26, 2016 at 9:07 AM, Stephen Mallette wrote: > There hasn't been

Re: [VOTE] TinkerPop 3.2.3 Release

Tests and packaging were good along with docs. Manual monkey testing went well. VOTE: +1 --Ted On Tue, Oct 18, 2016 at 8:42 PM, Marko Rodriguez wrote: > Ran full integration tests and they passed — 4 hours and 58 minutes later. > > Also looked over all the doc URLs and

[RESULT][VOTE] TinkerPop 3.1.5 Release

This vote is now closed with a total of 3 +1s, no +0s and no -1s. The results are: BINDING VOTES: +1 (3 -- Ted Wilmes, Stephen Mallette, Jason Plurad ) 0 (0) -1 (0) NON-BINDING VOTES: +1 (0) 0 (0) -1 (0) Thank you very much, Ted Wilmes

Re: [VOTE] TinkerPop 3.1.5 Release

s try to avoid the nays at this point please ;) > >> > >> On Thu, Oct 20, 2016 at 11:31 AM, Ted Wilmes <twil...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> > >> > We're close on this one, anyone else have a vote, yay or nay? > >> > > >> > Than

TinkerPop 3.1.5 Released: A 187 On The Undercover Gremlinz

Hello, TinkerPop 3.1.5 has just been released. This maintenance release contains a number of bug fixes on the "Undercover Gremlinz" release line and should be non-breaking for your upgrade needs. The release artifacts can be found at this location:

Re: [DISCUSS] Add HGraphDB to graph system listing

The 72 hours blew past and I didn't even notice. Looks like there aren't any objections so I'll get HGraphDB added to the listing tomorrow morning. Thanks, Ted On Fri, Nov 11, 2016 at 11:58 AM, Ted Wilmes <twil...@gmail.com> wrote: > I think at this point it's not too big of a problem

Re: New Committer: Robert Dale

Welcome Robert! --Ted On Thu, Oct 27, 2016 at 8:30 AM, Stephen Mallette wrote: > The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache TinkerPop has asked > Robert Dale to become a committer and we are pleased to announce that he > has accepted. > > Robert has submitted a

Re: Code Freeze 3.2.3/3.1.5

, Robert Dale <robd...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > I think TINKERPOP-1511 > > <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1511> should be fixed > in > > 3.2.3. > > > > On Fri, Oct 14, 2016 at 10:09 PM, Ted Wilmes <twil...@gmail.com> wro

Re: Code Freeze 3.2.3/3.1.5

ing). Upgrade docs look really solid for this release. Hopefully, > master is fully stable now and we won't need any more changes before I > build up the release for vote on monday. > > > On Tue, Oct 11, 2016 at 7:20 PM, Ted Wilmes <twil...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > I

Re: Code Freeze 3.1.8/3.2.6/3.3.0

Good morning, The 3.1.8 SNAPSHOT docs and jars have been deployed. Thanks, Ted On Sat, Aug 12, 2017 at 5:37 AM, Stephen Mallette wrote: > For the next week we're in code freeze on tp31, tp32 and master. Let's > spend the next week testing and reviewing documentation. I've

Re: [DISCUSS] 3.1.x EOL

That makes good sense to me. I'd be honored to lead it off into the sunset. --Ted On Wed, Aug 9, 2017 at 6:14 AM, Jorge Bay Gondra wrote: > 3.1 line is about 2 years old, I think its a lot of time for a relatively > new project like TinkerPop. > I'm in favor of making

[VOTE] TinkerPop 3.1.7 Release

for the next 72 hours --- closing Thursday (June 15, 2017) at 8pm CST. My vote is +1. Thank you very much, Ted Wilmes

Re: Code Freeze 3.1.7

tp31 is now reopened for 3.1.8 development. Thanks, Ted On Tue, Jun 6, 2017 at 8:52 AM, Ted Wilmes <twil...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hello, > 3.1.7 is now frozen and a snapshot build and updated docs have been > published. There isn't anything outstanding that I know of, but pleas

TinkerPop 3.1.7 Released: A 187 On The Undercover Gremlinz

Hello, TinkerPop 3.1.7 has just been released. This maintenance release contains a number of bug fixes on the "Undercover Gremlinz" release line and should be non-breaking for your upgrade needs. The release artifacts can be found at this location:

Re: [DISCUSS] Upcoming Release 3.2.5/3.1.7

I can do the 3.1.7 line. --Ted On Fri, May 26, 2017 at 9:06 AM, Stephen Mallette wrote: > I think we should start to firm things up for release of 3.2.5 and 3.1.7. > I'd like to propose that our code freeze period start Saturday June 3 with > a VOTE for release Monday,

Code Freeze 3.1.7

Hello, 3.1.7 is now frozen and a snapshot build and updated docs have been published. There isn't anything outstanding that I know of, but please let me know if anythings needs to be added this week. Thanks, Ted

Re: code freeze 3.2.5

Good deal, should I close out the vote for 3.1.7 tonight, barring any -1's and then we can hold off on the announcement to coincide with 3.2.5? --Ted On Thu, Jun 15, 2017 at 12:28 PM, Stephen Mallette wrote: > Kuppitz (who has the day off today) just informed me that the

[RESULT][VOTE] TinkerPop 3.1.7 Release

This vote is now closed with a total of 3 +1s, no +0s and no -1s. The results are: BINDING VOTES: +1 (3 -- Ted Wilmes, Stephen Mallette, Daniel Kuppitz) 0 (0) -1 (0) NON-BINDING VOTES: +1 (0) 0 (0) -1 (0) Thank you very much, Ted Wilmes

Re: [VOTE] TinkerPop 3.2.5 Release

VOTE: +1 --Ted On Fri, Jun 16, 2017 at 3:18 AM, Daniel Kuppitz wrote: > bin/validate-distribution.sh still looking good. > > VOTE: +1 > > > On Thu, Jun 15, 2017 at 10:33 PM, Stephen Mallette > wrote: > > > Hello (again), > > > > We are happy to

Re: TinkerPop Tutorial

Wow, very impressive. Definitely should be on the list. Adding this to me reading list. --Ted On Fri, Oct 6, 2017 at 9:59 AM, Marko Rodriguez wrote: > Hello, > > Kevin Lawrence posted this Gremlin tutorial on GitHub. > > https://github.com/krlawrence/graph

[RESULT][VOTE] TinkerPop 3.1.8 Release

This vote is now closed with a total of 3 +1s, no +0s and no -1s. The results are: BINDING VOTES: +1 (3 -- Ted Wilmes, Daniel Kuppitz, Stephen Mallette) 0 (0) -1 (0) NON-BINDING VOTES: +1 (0) 0 (0) -1 (0) Thank you very much, Ted Wilmes

[VOTE] TinkerPop 3.1.8 Release

] will be open for the next 72 hours --- closing Thursday (August 24, 2017) at 4pm CST. My vote is +1. Thank you very much, Ted Wilmes

TinkerPop 3.1.8 Released: A 187 On The Undercover Gremlinz

Hello, TinkerPop 3.1.8 has just been released. This maintenance release contains a number of bug fixes on the "Undercover Gremlinz" release line and should be non-breaking for your upgrade needs. The release artifacts can be found at this location:

Re: [VOTE] TinkerPop 3.2.6 Release

Validate distribution passed, docs look good. VOTE: +1 --Ted On Wed, Aug 23, 2017 at 7:51 AM, Stephen Mallette wrote: > weird - thanks for noticing. i'd be against stopping release over those > things - as you said, they are minor. let's fix those after release. > > On

Re: [VOTE] TinkerPop 3.3.0 Release

Validated distribution and docs look good. Epic release, great job. VOTE: +1 On Thu, Aug 24, 2017 at 10:00 AM, pieter gmail wrote: > Afraid I won't get time to refactor Sqlg's ChooseStep/OptionalStep > optimizations to deal with the new OptionalStep before the vote

Re: [VOTE] TinkerPop 3.3.1 Release

Docs and binaries look good, thanks for heading this up Stephen. VOTE: +1 Thanks, Ted On Tue, Dec 19, 2017 at 2:30 AM, pieter gmail wrote: > Hi, > > Tested Sqlg on 3.3.1. > > Custom, structured and process tests all pass. > > VOTE +1 > > Cheers > Pieter > > > On

Re: [VOTE] TinkerPop 3.2.7 Release

VOTE: +1 Thanks, Ted On Mon, Dec 18, 2017 at 2:15 PM, Daniel Kuppitz wrote: > /projects/apache/tinkerpop (tp32) $ bin/validate-distribution.sh 3.2.7 > > Validating binary distributions > > * downloading Apache TinkerPop Gremlin >

Re: [VOTE] TinkerPop 3.3.3 Release

Docs and validate looked good VOTE +1 Thanks, Ted On Wed, May 9, 2018 at 5:38 AM, Robert Dale wrote: > VOTE +1 > > $ bin/validate-distribution.sh 3.3.3 > > Validating binary distributions > > * downloading Apache TinkerPop Gremlin >

Re: [VOTE] TinkerPop 3.2.9 Release

Docs and validate looked good +1 Thanks, Ted On Wed, May 9, 2018 at 6:26 AM, Stephen Mallette wrote: > VOTE +1 - reviewed published docs a bit and validate-distribution.sh is > good > > On Tue, May 8, 2018 at 4:43 PM, Robert Dale wrote: > > > Hello, >

Re: [DISCUSS] Getting "Practical Gremlin" more visibilty

I'll register an official yes, yes, and yes. The docs will continue to serve as the source of truth and de facto TinkerPop reference. Practical Gremlin is a particularly good and comprehensive riff on that material that I think will resonate with many more folks if it is more easily found. Perhaps

Re: [TinkerPop] Re: New Committer: Kelvin Lawrence

Great news! Welcome Kelvin and thanks so much for all the work you've done. --Ted On Wed, Jan 3, 2018 at 9:08 AM, Jorge Bay Gondra wrote: > Welcome Kevin!!! > > On Wed, Jan 3, 2018 at 3:55 PM, Jason Plurad wrote: > > > Congrats, Kelvin! > > > > On

Re: [DISCUSS] Deprecation around Java driver

That sounds like a good approach. At this point, would you envision those being TP specific options or perhaps include include hooks to support arbitrary provider options? --Ted On Wed, Aug 8, 2018 at 1:00 PM Stephen Mallette wrote: > Allow the setting of the scriptEvaluationTimeout per

Re: [DISCUSS] Review Process

I fell way off the PR review train, I'll get back on. For clarification, is that a +1 on top of the submitter +1? I'm thinking you all just meant the submitter's +1 would be adequate after the lazy consensus period but wanted to be sure. I'd be fine to moving with that. My impression is that with

Re: [DISCUSS] Review Process

major > >>> feature or > >>> > significant change, the expectation is that the committer realizes > >>> this and > >>> > holds it open for 3 votes before committing. > >>> > > >>> > > >>> >

Re: [DISCUSS] Drop support for Giraph in 3.4.0

I agree, I think it's a good idea to remove it. I haven't ever run into anyone using the GiraphGraphComputer. --Ted On Wed, Mar 14, 2018 at 3:03 AM, Jorge Bay Gondra wrote: > I'm +1 on removing support for Giraph. > > We should try to simplify the build as much as

[RESULT][VOTE] TinkerPop 3.2.8 Release

This vote is now closed with a total of 4 +1s, no +0s and no -1s. The results are: BINDING VOTES: +1 (4 -- Ted Wilmes, Daniel Kuppitz, Stephen Mallette, Jason Plurad) 0 (0) -1 (0) NON-BINDING VOTES: +1 (0) 0 (0) -1 (0) Thank you very much, Ted Wilmes

TinkerPop 3.2.8 Released: Nine Inch Gremlins

Hello, TinkerPop 3.2.8 has just been released. This release marks the first official release of the Gremlin Javascript GLV. The 3.2.8 release also includes a number of other bug fixes and updates. Please refer to the changelog for more details. The release artifacts can be found at this

Re: [TinkerPop] TinkerPop 3.2.8 Released: Nine Inch Gremlins

om/package/gremlin > > On Tue, Apr 10, 2018 at 7:46 AM, Ted Wilmes <twil...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Hello, >> >> TinkerPop 3.2.8 has just been released. This release marks the first >> official release of the Gremlin Javascript GLV. The 3.2.8 release also >>

Re: [VOTE] TinkerPop 3.2.8 Release

t; > > * MD5 checksum ... OK > > > > > > * SHA1 checksum ... OK > > > > > > * unzipping Apache TinkerPop Gremlin ... OK > > > > > > * validating Apache TinkerPop Gremlin's docs ... OK > > > > > > * validating Apache TinkerPop Gremlin's binarie

[VOTE] TinkerPop 3.2.8 Release

for the next 72 hours --- closing Friday April 6, 2018 at 11:00 AM CDT. My vote is +1. Thank you very much, Ted Wilmes

Re: [DISCUSS] 3.2.8/3.3.2 Release Issues

Hi Stephen, I can take a crack at the 3.2.8 release. --Ted On Thu, Mar 22, 2018, 3:43 PM Stephen Mallette wrote: > So, TINKERPOP-1865 merged and TINKERPOP-1866 is in PR form awaiting review: > > https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/823 > > Insanely great work from

Re: A Question Regarding TP4 Processor Classifications

Hello, Excellent progress on the the RxJava processor. I was wondering if categories 1 and 2 can be combined where Pipes becomes the Flowable version of the RxJava processor? In this case, though single threaded, we'd still get the benefit of asynchronous execution of traversal steps versus

Re: A Question Regarding TP4 Processor Classifications

eve, given the CPU utilization/etc. points you make, that RxJava > will come into its own in multi-threaded mode (called ParallelFlowable) > when trying to get real-time performance from a query that > touches/generates lots of data (traversers). This is the reason for > Category

Re: [TP4 Benchmarking] Pipes vs. Single-Threaded RxJava vs. Multi-Threaded RxJava

I hadn't put together that each compilation could have its own processor. Very cool. Thanks for the benchmarking numbers. I had a tp3 inspired JMH-based module in progress when I saw your results so I added the two test traversals in. It doesn't do any parameterization of input sizes at this point

[jira] [Commented] (TINKERPOP-1254) Support dropping traverser path information when it is no longer needed.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1254?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15318584#comment-15318584 ] Ted Wilmes commented on TINKERPOP-1254: --- I'm getting close to ready for a review. I ended up

[jira] [Commented] (TINKERPOP-1254) Support dropping traverser path information when it is no longer needed.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1254?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15308248#comment-15308248 ] Ted Wilmes commented on TINKERPOP-1254: --- Not sure if this makes sense, but I'm in the thick

[jira] [Commented] (TINKERPOP-1254) Support dropping traverser path information when it is no longer needed.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1254?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15307845#comment-15307845 ] Ted Wilmes commented on TINKERPOP-1254: --- I'm pretty close to PR-ready. Hopefully have something

[jira] [Comment Edited] (TINKERPOP-1254) Support dropping traverser path information when it is no longer needed.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1254?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15334745#comment-15334745 ] Ted Wilmes edited comment on TINKERPOP-1254 at 6/16/16 10:23 PM

[jira] [Updated] (TINKERPOP-1254) Support dropping traverser path information when it is no longer needed.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1254?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Ted Wilmes updated TINKERPOP-1254: -- Fix Version/s: 3.2.1 > Support dropping traverser path information when it is no lon

[jira] [Closed] (TINKERPOP-1254) Support dropping traverser path information when it is no longer needed.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1254?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Ted Wilmes closed TINKERPOP-1254. - Resolution: Fixed > Support dropping traverser path information when it is no longer nee

[jira] [Commented] (TINKERPOP-1287) StarGraph has an overdose of Stream usage.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1287?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15424532#comment-15424532 ] Ted Wilmes commented on TINKERPOP-1287: --- I've completed the stream conversion on this one

[jira] (TINKERPOP-1619) TinkerGraphComputer worker count affects OptionalStep query results

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1619?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15847108#comment-15847108 ] Ted Wilmes commented on TINKERPOP-1619: --- That's a good question, {{tp32}} throws this exception

[jira] (TINKERPOP-1619) TinkerGraphComputer worker count affects OptionalStep query results

Ted Wilmes created TINKERPOP-1619: - Summary: TinkerGraphComputer worker count affects OptionalStep query results Key: TINKERPOP-1619 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1619 Project

[jira] (TINKERPOP-1619) TinkerGraphComputer worker count affects OptionalStep query results

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1619?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15847131#comment-15847131 ] Ted Wilmes commented on TINKERPOP-1619: --- Ok, that makes sense. I was wondering if when I bumped

[jira] (TINKERPOP-1597) PathRetractionStrategy messing up certain traversals

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1597?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Ted Wilmes closed TINKERPOP-1597. - Resolution: Fixed A `PathRetractionStrategy` test has been added to verify the nested `dedup

[jira] [Created] (TINKERPOP-1620) Choose with count branch traversal type coercion

Ted Wilmes created TINKERPOP-1620: - Summary: Choose with count branch traversal type coercion Key: TINKERPOP-1620 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1620 Project: TinkerPop

[jira] [Closed] (TINKERPOP-1433) Add steps to dev docs to help committers get their keys in order

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1433?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Ted Wilmes closed TINKERPOP-1433. - Resolution: Fixed Fix Version/s: 3.2.4 3.3.0 > Add steps to

[jira] [Closed] (TINKERPOP-1583) PathRetractionStrategy retracts keys that are actually needed

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1583?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Ted Wilmes closed TINKERPOP-1583. - Resolution: Fixed Fix Version/s: 3.2.4 > PathRetractionStrategy retracts k

[jira] [Closed] (TINKERPOP-1405) profile() doesn't like withPath()

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1405?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Ted Wilmes closed TINKERPOP-1405. - > profile() doesn't like withPath() > - > >

[jira] [Commented] (TINKERPOP-1415) Vertex programs that rely on getting path parameters can't work

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1415?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15436838#comment-15436838 ] Ted Wilmes commented on TINKERPOP-1415: --- It's all coming back to me know, thanks [~okram

[jira] [Created] (TINKERPOP-1433) Add steps to dev docs to help committers get their keys in order

Ted Wilmes created TINKERPOP-1433: - Summary: Add steps to dev docs to help committers get their keys in order Key: TINKERPOP-1433 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1433 Project

[jira] [Commented] (TINKERPOP-1433) Add steps to dev docs to help committers get their keys in order

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1433?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15552512#comment-15552512 ] Ted Wilmes commented on TINKERPOP-1433: --- Yes, I need to do this and then incorporate a few other

[jira] [Commented] (TINKERPOP-1415) Vertex programs that rely on getting path parameters can't work

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1415?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15435076#comment-15435076 ] Ted Wilmes commented on TINKERPOP-1415: --- Hi Bryn, do things work if you use {{withPath

[jira] [Commented] (TINKERPOP-1415) Vertex programs that rely on getting path parameters can't work

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1415?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15435078#comment-15435078 ] Ted Wilmes commented on TINKERPOP-1415: --- Hi Bryn, do things work if you use {{withPath

[jira] [Issue Comment Deleted] (TINKERPOP-1415) Vertex programs that rely on getting path parameters can't work

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1415?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Ted Wilmes updated TINKERPOP-1415: -- Comment: was deleted (was: Hi Bryn, do things work if you use {{withPath}} by chance like

[jira] [Commented] (TINKERPOP-1404) Path/label optimization

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1404?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15529426#comment-15529426 ] Ted Wilmes commented on TINKERPOP-1404: --- Apologies for not looking yet [~pietermartin]. Please

[jira] [Commented] (TINKERPOP-965) Optimize TraversalStrategy application

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-965?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15527359#comment-15527359 ] Ted Wilmes commented on TINKERPOP-965: -- I've made some initial profiling progress

[jira] [Created] (TINKERPOP-1548) Traversals can complete before interrupted in TraversalInterruptionComputerTest

Ted Wilmes created TINKERPOP-1548: - Summary: Traversals can complete before interrupted in TraversalInterruptionComputerTest Key: TINKERPOP-1548 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1548

[jira] [Closed] (TINKERPOP-1548) Traversals can complete before interrupted in TraversalInterruptionComputerTest

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1548?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Ted Wilmes closed TINKERPOP-1548. - Resolution: Fixed Fix Version/s: 3.2.4 > Traversals can complete before interrup

  1   2   >