Hello Incubator PMC,
The Apache Traffic Control community has voted on and approved a
proposal to release Apache Traffic Control 1.8.0-incubating. We now
kindly request that the Incubator PMC members review and vote on this
incubator release.
The VOTE RESULT is here:
Hello Incubator PMC,
The Apache Traffic Control community has voted on and approved a
proposal to release Apache Traffic Control 1.8.0-incubating. We now
kindly request that the Incubator PMC members review and vote on this
incubator release.
The VOTE RESULT is here:
nd signatures good
> - incubating in name
> - tarball builds successfully
> - git tag good
>
> —Eric
>
>> On Jan 19, 2017, at 2:58 PM, Dan Kirkwood <dang...@apache.org> wrote:
>>
>> Thanks, Hank..I don't think the double-license or double-use
>>
data
- login from UI, navigating parts of UI
On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 9:15 AM, Dan Kirkwood <dang...@apache.org> wrote:
> Hello All,
>
> I've prepared another release for v1.8.0 (RC9)
>
> Changes since 1.7.0:
> https://github.com/apache/incubator-trafficcontrol/compare
The vote is now closed and RC11 passes with 5 +1 votes and no -1 votes.
I'll craft a new vote to the IPMC starting today and ending on Friday.
Thanks, all!
Dan
Hello Incubator PMC,
The Apache Traffic Control community has voted on and approved a
proposal to release Apache Traffic Control 1.8.0-incubating. We now
kindly request that the Incubator PMC members review and vote on this
incubator release.
The VOTE RESULT is here:
Hello All,
I've prepared another release for v1.8.0 (RC11). I apologize for the
confusion on RC10 -- we had a glitch in our tagging process. RC11 is
identical to RC10, but we decided to redo the process to ensure the
integrity of the release. The source tarballs are identical in
content --
Good thing I waited..Something went wrong with my git clone and a
bunch of changes went in from master...
-1 -- I'll get a new one in tomorrow.
-dan
On Thu, Feb 16, 2017 at 1:35 PM, Dan Kirkwood <dang...@apache.org> wrote:
> ok -- a bit premature.. I'll wait until tomorro
>>>
>>> +1
>>>
>>> Looks like only licenses were changed.
>>>
>>>
>>> On 02/17/2017 03:07 PM, Dan Kirkwood wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hello All,
>>>>
>>>> I've prepared another release
Hello All,
I've prepared another release for v1.8.0 (RC10)
Changes since 1.7.0:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-trafficcontrol/compare/RELEASE-1.7.0...RELEASE-1.8.0-RC10
This corresponds to git:
Hash: 14ef03fd251b6306e67627c935f9111efb0284af
Tag: RELEASE-1.8.0-RC10
Which can be
+1
I put together the tarball myself, but also downloaded the tarball
and verified checksums and signature from the downloaded files. Also
built from source.
Dan
On Thu, Feb 16, 2017 at 11:50 AM, Dan Kirkwood <dang...@apache.org> wrote:
> Hello All,
>
> I've prepared
We have 4 +1 already, so I'm declaring RC10 as passed!
I'll send out the email to the IPMC shortly...
Thanks all..
-dan
On Thu, Feb 16, 2017 at 11:50 AM, Dan Kirkwood <dang...@apache.org> wrote:
> Hello All,
>
> I've prepared another release for v1.8.0 (RC10)
>
> Changes
:32 PM, Leif Hedstrom <zw...@apache.org> wrote:
>
>> On Nov 8, 2016, at 3:27 PM, Dan Kirkwood <dang...@apache.org> wrote:
>>
>> Hello All,
>>
>> I've prepared a release for v1.8.0 (RC1)
>>
>> Changes since 1.7.0:
>> https://github.com/
:
> https://www.apache.org/dev/release-publishing.html#valid
> https://www.apache.org/dev/release-signing.html#basics
>
>
> On Nov 8, 2016, at 5:38 PM, Dan Kirkwood
> <dang...@gmail.com<mailto:dang...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>
> Hi Leif, we are aware of that and wa
ok -- tarball and armored signatures are now included in
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/trafficcontrol/1.8.0/RC1/
. Adding that to the instructions for future release mgrs...
I'll work on getting the NOTICE updated and creating a KEYS file as
well.Once those are done,
e project name
> and "incubating" (e.g. traffic_control_incubating_1.8.0_source.tar.gz).
> We can also include the RPMs but we should note that they are for
> convenience only and therefore they shouldnt need incubating in the name.
>
> On Wed, Nov 9, 2016 at 9:13 AM, Dan
Thanks for looking at that, Leif.. I'm sure we have a few more
details to get right.. I'm pretty sure most of those are from
external sources, so need to be added to NOTICE..
-Dan
On Wed, Nov 9, 2016 at 10:28 AM, Leif Hedstrom <zw...@apache.org> wrote:
>
>> On Nov 8, 2016,
Hi all,
I'm looking at files that are missing license details per Leif's email
from earlier today. I'm finding that some aren't clear. For
instance, it appears that some files in
`docs/source/_themes/sphinx_rtd_theme` have a statement like this:
> :copyright: Copyright 2007-2013 by
Hi Burak,
The best place to ask questions is one of the mailing lists -- for using
traffic control, you can subscribe at users-subscribe@trafficcont
rol.incubator.apache.org,
and for development: dev-subscr...@trafficcontrol.incubator.apache.org.
We have been working on adding docker containers
Still relevant tho..yes, please help the poor RMs :-)
On Fri, Nov 11, 2016 at 2:54 PM, Leif Hedstrom wrote:
>
>> On Nov 11, 2016, at 1:28 PM, David Neuman wrote:
>>
>> I actually don't think we can do milestones, labels, or assignees in github
>>
On Dec 2, 2016, at 5:57 PM, Dan Kirkwood <dang...@apache.org> wrote:
>>
>> Thanks again for the feedback, Leif..There is a .rat_excludes
>> file at the top level, but it looks like we didn't get it fully
>> populated. The .json files should certainly be excl
y set something up in our private Jenkins if theres not a
> better option.
>
> —Eric
>
>> On Dec 8, 2016, at 11:24 AM, Dan Kirkwood <dang...@apache.org> wrote:
>>
>> FYI -- we decided to -1 this based on more license issues.. The
>> .rat-excludes file
Hello All,
I've prepared another release for v1.8.0 (RC4)
Changes since 1.7.0:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-trafficcontrol/compare/RELEASE-1.7.0...RELEASE-1.8.0-RC4
This corresponds to git:
Hash: 7d8a88d0512ffe0354c2bc079ddbf2e7b67b6c3e
Tag: RELEASE-1.8.0-RC4
Which can be verified
share!
Thanks.. Dan
On Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 11:23 AM, Dan Kirkwood <dang...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I have no control over the mentors :-)Yes -- since you chimed in,
> I'm happy to wait for your input..
>
> -Dan
>
> On Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 10:50 AM, Leif Hedstrom
Reminder -- 1.8.0-RC4 is open for voting until 5pm MST today. Please
vote by replying to this email. The release is available here:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/trafficcontrol/1.8.0/RC4/
On Thu, Dec 8, 2016 at 12:58 PM, Dan Kirkwood <dang...@apache.org> wrote:
>
Hello All,
I've prepared another release for v1.8.0 (RC7)
Changes since 1.7.0:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-trafficcontrol/compare/RELEASE-1.7.0...RELEASE-1.8.0-RC8
This corresponds to git:
Hash:597e7795c48ab65fe57175642973481b9dc020e6
Tag: RELEASE-1.8.0-RC8
Which can be verified
Hello All,
I've prepared a release for v1.8.0 (RC2)
Changes since 1.7.0:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-trafficcontrol/compare/RELEASE-1.7.0...RELEASE-1.8.0-RC2
This corresponds to git:
Hash: 8766dbcb38105fbc97b955b4733defe40c83db00
Tag: RELEASE-1.8.0-RC2
Which can be verified with the
file name, we've been following
that convention in the rpm name for a while. Do you think it should
be dropped from the tarball? That's written to BUILD_NUMBER before
it's created..
-Dan
On Thu, Dec 1, 2016 at 12:35 PM, Leif Hedstrom <zw...@apache.org> wrote:
>
>> On Nov 3
I'd also love to ditch the RPMs,but I'll abstain from voting since
it directly impacts me immediately (less work for me!).
Would anyone else like to weigh in on this?
Dan
On Thu, Dec 1, 2016 at 12:52 PM, Leif Hedstrom wrote:
>
>> On Dec 1, 2016, at 12:46 PM, Phil Sorber
Hello All,
I've prepared another release for v1.8.0 (RC3)
Changes since 1.7.0:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-trafficcontrol/compare/RELEASE-1.7.0...RELEASE-1.8.0-RC3
This corresponds to git:
Hash: daf585eacdcae4f57d60f14b4b6170b004058559
Tag: RELEASE-1.8.0-RC3
Which can be verified with
as well :-)
We'll work on this more on Monday.
thanks! Dan
On Fri, Dec 2, 2016 at 4:07 PM, Leif Hedstrom <zw...@apache.org> wrote:
>
>> On Dec 1, 2016, at 4:02 PM, Dan Kirkwood <dang...@apache.org> wrote:
>>
>> Hello All,
>>
>> I've prepared another
Hi all.. We haven't really established a process for this, but to
keep in compliance with Apache license guidelines, each source file
should have the Apache license comment -- normally at the head of the
file, but I think that's somewhat flexible.
Still going thru files adding them, but
:
> +1 and sorry for merging a PR without. I will make sure all files have them
> before merging in the future.
>
> On Mon, Dec 5, 2016 at 15:48 Dan Kirkwood <dang...@apache.org> wrote:
>
>> Hi all.. We haven't really established a process for this, but to
>>
On Dec 5, 2016, at 3:48 PM, Dan Kirkwood <dang...@apache.org> wrote:
>>
>> Hi all.. We haven't really established a process for this, but to
>> keep in compliance with Apache license guidelines, each source file
>> should have the Apache license comment -- nor
Hello All,
I've prepared another release for v1.8.0 (RC6)
Changes since 1.7.0:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-trafficcontrol/compare/RELEASE-1.7.0...RELEASE-1.8.0-RC6
This corresponds to git:
Hash: 20d7e37b57b9aa47e7731595641920de268ea219
Tag: RELEASE-1.8.0-RC6
Which can be verified
, Leif Hedstrom <zw...@apache.org> wrote:
>
>> On Jan 6, 2017, at 2:15 PM, Dan Kirkwood <dang...@apache.org> wrote:
>>
>> Hello All,
>>
>> I've prepared another release for v1.8.0 (RC6)
>>
>> Changes since 1.7.0:
>> https://github.com/
Hello All,
I've prepared another release for v1.8.0 (RC5)
Changes since 1.7.0:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-trafficcontrol/compare/RELEASE-1.7.0...RELEASE-1.8.0-RC5
This corresponds to git:
Hash: b30cbc5d32c991e472c082b97f9bfd73a7699c66
Tag: RELEASE-1.8.0-RC5
Which can be verified
One correction: The signed source tarball and checksums are available here:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/trafficcontrol/1.8.0/RC5/
wrote:
>
>> On Dec 8, 2016, at 12:58 PM, Dan Kirkwood <dang...@apache.org> wrote:
>>
>> Hello All,
>>
>> I've prepared another release for v1.8.0 (RC4)
>>
>> Changes since 1.7.0:
>> https://github.com/apache/incubator-trafficcontrol/compare/RELEASE-1.
+1
On Thu, Apr 6, 2017 at 7:43 AM, David Neuman wrote:
> Since the Cookie Jar functionality is new to 2.0 and 2.0 is not yet
> released, why don't we just remove the `ResumeSession` method all together
> and eliminate the dependency? Otherwise we are deprecating
+1
On Fri, Mar 3, 2017 at 4:59 PM, Jeremy Mitchell wrote:
> thanks for doing that, Ashish. I would say go ahead and move pages to where
> they seem appropriate. That would be a great starting point. thanks again.
>
> Jeremy
>
> On Fri, Mar 3, 2017 at 10:44 AM, Durfey,
The Apache Traffic Control team would like to announce the release of
Apache Traffic Control 1.8.0 (incubating).
More details regarding Apache Traffic Control can be found at:
http://trafficcontrol.incubator.apache.org/
The release artifacts can be downloaded here:
Hi all..I've submitted a PR
(https://github.com/apache/incubator-trafficcontrol/pull/327) for
building using docker/docker-compose that eliminates pulling the
source code from github and instead builds from your local source
tree.
There have been questions in the past about the github
Thanks, Hank..feel free to ping either me or Eric if anything is
unclear in the release manager notes.
-dan
On Mon, Jul 17, 2017 at 12:56 PM, Hank Beatty wrote:
> Hi Dave,
>
> I would like to volunteer.
>
> Thanks,
> Hank
>
> On 07/05/2017 03:38 PM, Dave Neuman wrote:
Thanks, Jason..I'll look into that.
+1 on Dave's comments -- the process shouldn't be that heavy-weight.
Yes -- there *should* be Jira tickets for anything not trivial, but
should be at the discretion of the PR reviewer whether to request it
or not..
-dan
On Wed, Jul 19, 2017 at 7:55 AM,
quot; for a one time test run
>
> What is the difference between these two?
>
> On Tue, Aug 8, 2017 at 3:46 PM Volz, Dylan (Contractor) <
> dylan_v...@comcast.com> wrote:
>
>> Perhaps it could check for WIP prefix to prevent noisy(?) failures on
>> incomplete
looks like it will skip if the title contains [skipXXXci] where XXX is
any non-whitespace.. Not sure why that form, but it's possible.
I'll wait for other feedback before making any change to that.
one else's
>> understanding
>> > > as
>> > > > well?
>> > > > Does anyone know of any showstopper issues that still exist?
>> > > >
>> > > > Thanks,
>> > > > Dave
>> > > >
>> > &
+1 here as well..
On Wed, May 17, 2017 at 9:38 AM, Eric Friedrich (efriedri)
wrote:
> I am all for one less tool to use. Also I think it will lower bar to bringing
> more people into our project if they don’t have to sign up for the ASF JIRA
> separately.
>
> —Eric
>
>> On
by "HEAD", I meant "master"...
On Wed, May 17, 2017 at 11:05 AM, Dan Kirkwood <dang...@gmail.com> wrote:
> yep -- it appears that
> https://github.com/apache/incubator-trafficcontrol/commit/ad28f33fea62cc5ce2c5a7a667b8cf9f06b7b7a2
> removed the juju/persist
Rob removed those from master -- I just merged it. He'll be
cherry-picking for a 2.0.x PR shortly.
On Wed, May 17, 2017 at 11:13 AM, Dan Kirkwood <dang...@gmail.com> wrote:
> by "HEAD", I meant "master"...
>
> On Wed, May 17, 2017 at 11:05 AM, Dan Kirkwoo
yeah -- what Hank said...
On Wed, May 17, 2017 at 11:17 AM, Hank Beatty wrote:
> -1 for a manual changelog - doing a compare between branches/commits in
> github is relatively simple.
>
> +1 for a scripted changelog -
> https://github.com/skywinder/github-changelog-generator
+1
I checked:
- git tag verified
- gpg sig is good
- checksums match source tarball
- tarball has correct name and structure
- rpms build from tarball
- traffic_ops installation and postinstall on a clean Centos7 VM
- some basic traffic_ops UI functionality
- docs no longer mention build area to
Hi, Amir..
We are using Centos 7.2 for traffic ops installation, and using
docker-compose to build. Follow the instructions in `BUILD.md` (at
the top level of trafficcontrol) and then installation instructions in
`traffic_ops/INSTALL.md`.
Today is a holiday in the U.S., but I'll check email
+1
On Thu, May 18, 2017 at 2:32 PM, Jan van Doorn wrote:
> In
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/5bdb9b073343f49c1d5b85147eb9d260bf7ad15d61384929993c7e1d@%3Cdev.trafficcontrol.apache.org%3E
> Dave
> mentioned that we can now move to "full" GitHub. Some more information in
>
With 4 +1 votes and no -1 votes, this release candidate passes.
I'll send out a vote to the Incubator PMC later today.
thanks! Dan
On Wed, May 31, 2017 at 4:30 PM, Dan Kirkwood <dang...@apache.org> wrote:
> Hello All,
>
> I've prepared the first candidate release for incubator
unfortunately, have to -1.
Building traffic_ops from the tarball using docker-compose gives me this error:
traffic_ops_build_1 | The build area has been initialized.
traffic_ops_build_1 | Building the rpm.
traffic_ops_build_1 | error: line 26: Tag takes single token
only: Release:
; On 06/08/2017 11:30 AM, Dan Kirkwood wrote:
>>
>> not that I'm aware of... please do file an issue for it, though and
>> attach that to the PR.
>>
>> thanks! Dan
>>
>> On Thu, Jun 8, 2017 at 9:18 AM, Hank Beatty <hbea...@apache.org> wrote:
>
I checked the signature, but didn't get Eric's key from the gpg
refresh. He's looking into that now..
Meanwhile, I'm going to build and install fresh.
btw, Eric -- the Changes section above should be:
> Changes since 1.8.1:
>
+ builds from source extracted from tarball
+ rpm for traffic_ops installs on clean machine
-dan
On Thu, Jun 15, 2017 at 1:41 PM, Dan Kirkwood <dang...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I checked the signature, but didn't get Eric's key from the gpg
> refresh. He's looking into that now..
>
&g
The vote passes with three +1 and no -1 votes.
Thanks!
The Apache Traffic Control (Incubating) team
ependency, which is difficult since few package managers have a modern Go
> package. Goose is MIT,
> https://www.apache.org/dev/licensing-howto.html#binary suggests we can, yes?
>
>
> On Mon, May 1, 2017 at 8:31 AM, Dan Kirkwood <dang...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> ughh..
ughh.. I'd forgotten I'd done that in all this..
Again -- catch-22.
On Sun, Apr 30, 2017 at 10:20 PM, Mark Torluemke wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 30, 2017 at 7:05 PM, Gelinas, Derek
> wrote:
>
>> +1 on both of these.
>>
>> > On Apr 30, 2017, at
I'm also with Dave on using github (preferably not Jira) for tracking
this..Some enterprising individual could use the github api to
produce such a report as well showing what's being worked and what
isn't...
-dan
On Thu, May 25, 2017 at 1:46 PM, Dewayne Richardson wrote:
Hello All,
I've prepared the first candidate release for incubator-trafficcontrol
v1.8.1 (RC0)
Changes since 1.8.0:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-trafficcontrol/compare/RELEASE-1.8.0...RELEASE-1.8.1-RC0
This corresponds to git:
Hash: cc56e76320f6d63f611d4070a1aca1e82d235a61
Tag:
the release (please provide specific comments)
This vote will be open for at least 72 hours.
Thanks,
Dan Kirkwood <dang...@apache.org>
+1 -- signature and hashes checked.
All components build from source tarball.
On Mon, Jun 5, 2017 at 12:29 PM, Jeff Elsloo wrote:
> +1 again. Signature and hashes validate.
> --
> Thanks,
> Jeff
>
>
> On Mon, Jun 5, 2017 at 12:16 PM, Eric Friedrich (efriedri)
>
:49 PM, sebb <seb...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 5 June 2017 at 22:12, Dan Kirkwood <dang...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> DROPPED user@ list - see below.
>
>> Hello Incubator PMC,
>>
>> The Apache Traffic Control community has voted on and approved a
>> proposa
Hi, all..
With our ongoing effort to move Traffic Ops from the Perl Mojolicious
framework to Go, one thing that's hampered this effort is
duplication of configuration. The cdn.conf has always been in Perl
hash form.
To prevent the need to parse Perl constructs in Go, I've introduced a
PR for
review later this week.
thanks.. Dan Kirkwood
As one ready to jump in and add more endpoints, I'm a strong +1 on
using sqlx. I agree that adding a new dependency should not be done
without consideration, but I find the sqlx version much more readable
and easier to approach than either your or dew's version of non-sqlx
and would be much
+1
On Mon, Aug 28, 2017 at 10:38 AM, Eric Friedrich (efriedri)
wrote:
> We currently use JIRA Issues to track all of the Traffic Control bugs.
>
> Now that we have write access to Github, we can move back to GH Issues for
> bug tracking.
>
> This will be a better workflow
+1 as well...
This query should show all PRs merged since the 2.1 branch:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-trafficcontrol/pulls?utf8=%E2%9C%93=is%3Apr+is%3Aclosed+merged%3A%3E%3D2017-08-04+base%3Amaster
On Thu, Dec 14, 2017 at 2:02 PM, Jeremy Mitchell wrote:
> This
I do think, however, that we should have an actual download link so
the origin can be confirmed.
On Mon, Dec 18, 2017 at 1:18 PM, Dan Kirkwood <dang...@gmail.com> wrote:
> wow.. nicely done!
>
> On Mon, Dec 18, 2017 at 1:04 PM, Eric Friedrich (efriedri)
> <efri
wow.. nicely done!
On Mon, Dec 18, 2017 at 1:04 PM, Eric Friedrich (efriedri)
wrote:
>
>
> Begin forwarded message:
>
> From: Daniel Miessler
> >
> Subject: Re: OWASP SecLists license
> Date: December 18, 2017 at
d or postinstall.
>> >
>> > On Mon, Dec 18, 2017 at 11:40 AM, Eric Friedrich (efriedri)
>> > <efrie...@cisco.com> wrote:
>> > > It can be downloaded from Github.
>> > >
>> > > I think this is the file (Rob correct me if I picked
e wrong variant):
> https://github.com/danielmiessler/SecLists/blob/master/Passwords/10_million_password_list_top_10.txt
>
> —Eric
>
> On Dec 18, 2017, at 1:38 PM, Dan Kirkwood
> <dang...@gmail.com<mailto:dang...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>
> Rob, is there
; >>>> That's correct. No RPM, unfortunately. License is here:
>> > > >>>> https://www.owasp.org/index.php/Projects/OWASP_SecLists_Project.
>> > > >>>>
>> > > >>>> -1 on downloading during rpmbuild, or especially posti
FYI -- apparently the Fedora project is doing some infrastructure
maintenance which is causing the builds to fail... Hopefully will be
resolved before long..
https://status.fedoraproject.org/
-dan
On Tue, Dec 5, 2017 at 1:22 PM, Apache Jenkins Server
wrote:
> See
>
+1
I checked:
- git tag verified
- pgp signature matched
- checksum matched
- all components build with `./pkg -v`
- TO install and run on fresh Centos 7.4 VM
On Mon, May 14, 2018 at 2:52 PM Jeff Elsloo wrote:
> +1
>
> Signature validates and tests performed previously were
Hey, Rob, I'm not voting yet since I've only verified the checksums and
signature, but the email still mentions md5 and sha1 checksums -- only
sha512 checksum and pgp signature are there. I think the correct files are
provided and the email is incorrect.
-dan
On Fri, May 11, 2018 at 12:22 PM
in the wiki.
>
> On Sun, May 13, 2018 at 12:07 PM, Dan Kirkwood <dang...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Hey, Rob, I'm not voting yet since I've only verified the checksums and
> > signature, but the email still mentions md5 and sha1 checksums -- only
> > sha512 c
Hi Henk..I think those issues should now be resolved:
- 1.8.x files removed from
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/trafficcontrol
- links to checksum and .asc signature files no longer point to the mirror
thanks for pointing these out!
Dan Kirkwood
On Thu, Dec 28, 2017 at 3
with the caveat that the name should be CHANGELOG.md or Changelog.md
to make it stand out in the directory listing and to use the standard
suffix.
[X] +1 to adding a changelog.MD file
[] -1 to adding a changelog.MD file
[] +1 to adding a changelog label in github
[X] -1 to adding a changelog
+1 -- agree with Jeff -- the validation of the fields of
deliveryservice is something that is incomplete in the Perl
traffic_ops.
These libraries make for concise code to do the validation so it will
be easier to extend without much extra code. It will not be called
on every API function, but
-1 because of an issue building traffic_ops from source:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-trafficcontrol/issues/1916
PR to fix this is forthcoming..
On Thu, Feb 22, 2018 at 6:15 AM, Steve Malenfant
wrote:
> Maybe I should have mentioned a few more details...
>
> As
ps://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/trafficcontrol/2.1.0/RC2/
>
>
>>> Please rename
>>> apache-trafficcontrol-2.1.0-incubating.tar.gz.sha
>
>
>> I have renamed the file.
>
>
> Some more points ; in dist/incubator/trafficcontrol/
>
&
My apologies -- Henk Penning -- not Hank...
On Thu, Dec 28, 2017 at 11:41 AM, Jeremy Mitchell <mitchell...@gmail.com> wrote:
> +1 to removing the 1.8.0 and 1.8.1 releases per Hank's instructions...
>
> On Thu, Dec 28, 2017 at 11:22 AM, Dan Kirkwood <dang...@apache.org> wrot
+1
On Thu, Dec 21, 2017 at 12:26 AM, Nir Sopher wrote:
> +1
>
> On Thu, Dec 21, 2017 at 5:18 AM, Jeremy Mitchell
> wrote:
>
>> +1
>>
>> On Wed, Dec 20, 2017 at 5:34 PM, Steve Malenfant
>> wrote:
>>
>> > +1
>> >
>> > On Wed, Dec 20,
+1 -- I checked:
- hashes and signature good
- builds all from `./pkg -v`
- TO rpm installs cleanly on a fresh VM
- TO basic functionality works (no extensive testing..)
On Wed, Mar 7, 2018 at 7:00 AM, Eric Friedrich (efriedri) <
efrie...@cisco.com> wrote:
> +1
>
> I checked the following:
> -
o be `git -amend`ed.
>
> I definitely wouldn't want a PR that contained that information only
> in the PR body,
> and there's not a whole lot of value in asking them to re-type it. The
> "copy/paste" thing
> at the top is already a bit of duplication anyway.
>
> O
Hank, fyi -- from the top level of trafficcontrol, `./pkg -v` will build
all components.
-dan
On Thu, Mar 8, 2018 at 6:34 AM, Hank Beatty wrote:
> +1
>
> Lab Testing:
>
> - Docker build - Could not figure out how to get all components to build
> at once
> - build/build.sh
+1
I tested:
- signature and checksum good
- `./pkg -v` builds all components successfully
- traffic_ops installs on clean Centos 7 VM
- postinstall properly configures
- a couple of basic traffiic_ops calls return proper json output
On Mon, Apr 9, 2018 at 3:58 PM, David Neuman
> and hereby is created, the person holding such office to serve at the
> > direction of the Board of Directors as the chair of the Apache Traffic
> > Control Project, and to have primary responsibility for management of
> > the projects within the scope of responsibility
+1
On Tue, Feb 27, 2018 at 2:50 PM, Jeremy Mitchell
wrote:
> I like that format. Bullets seems nice and simple with external links where
> more info is required.
>
> I would be in favor of a PR to add these sections so it's easy for the next
> person to add a bullet to
+1 on keeping it short and to the point...
On Wed, Feb 28, 2018 at 10:14 AM, Jeremy Mitchell
wrote:
> Chris, I really wanted the PR template to be less daunting and super short
> and to the point. It's intention is to give a super quick summary of what's
> included in
followup: rather than
`What is the best way to verify this PR? `
what about
`What effect should I expect to see from this change?`
On Wed, Feb 28, 2018 at 10:25 AM, Dan Kirkwood <dang...@gmail.com> wrote:
> +1 on keeping it short and to the point...
>
> On Wed, Feb 28, 2
97 matches
Mail list logo